Fortifications Worksheet Answers – Star Fort and Cannon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fortifications Worksheet Answers – Star Fort and Cannon FORTIFICATIONS WORKSHEET ANSWERS – STAR FORT AND CANNON Deal Castle (photo from Wikemedia Commons) – notice its cannon CORRECT! Cannon balls would just sink into the earth ramparts of a star fort, so the attackers’ fire would not easily have killed the defenders or destroyed their cannon. Gunpowder is much more powerful than muscle-power, so a cannon can fire a ball a kilometre; an archer could only fire 2-300m. and early hand-guns (‘muskets’) could not fire much further. A large gun, like a cannon, can fire further than a small hand-gun, because air-resistance slows the small musket-ball quicker than the large cannon-ball, so the only weapon to use against a big gun is another big gun (this is still try today, which is why tanks, with their big guns, are still important despite being clumsy and expensive) The tall walls of castles made an easy target for cannon; Warwick Castle only survived because it was on the winning side in the English Civil War. There are many ruined castles, such as Kenilworth which were destroyed after sieges with cannon. Medieval castles were not designed to have large cannon, weighing a ton or more, on their walls. Gunpowder also made it much easier to undermine castle walls; only a small tunnel, enough for a some barrels of gunpowder was needed, instead of the big tunnel which medieval attackers needed as they relied on burning the pit-props. The new designs fortifications were low (so they made a small target) and designed for ‘defence in depth’ so if one layer of the fort was destroyed by cannon, or blown up by a mine, the defenders could retreat to the next layer. As the picture shows, Deal Castle, built by Henry VIII in 1539 has three layers of defences, and a moat. The defenders’ cannon would have killed any attackers in the open by firing grape-shot and would have destroyed cannon which were in the open. Attackers would have had to build ‘batteries’ for their cannon (these were small earth ramparts, big enough to protect the cannon and the ‘magazines’ of gunpowder used to fire the shot). To actually attack the fortress, they would have to dig trenches towards it, so the earth protected them: the earth dug out of the trenches was put into big baskets called ‘gabions’ which acted as a rampart when they were full and gave extra protection. This took a long time, as the trenches had to be in a zig-zag; if the trenches pointed straight towards the fortress the defenders could have fired straight down them, so if the attackers started to dig a kilometre away (a safe distance from cannon-shot) they might have to make a trench two kilometres long. When they were close enough, the attackers would come out of the trench and try to storm the fortress. Deal Castle is one of the few forts designed for cannon in the United Kingdom, as by 1500 England and Wales were a single kingdom, as was Scotland, which united peacefully with England in 1603. By this time the chief defence of the United Kingdom, until the Second World War, was the Royal Navy, (see the Suomenlinna and Pillbox worksheets) and the few defensive British fortifications were built mainly on the coast. In continental Europe there were frequent land wars, especially between France and Austria. Great engineers like the French military engineer developed new and complex designs of fort. They were needed especially in the flat areas between northern France and Russia, and along the Danube valley, where there were no mountains to provide natural defences. Fort Bourtange (picture from Wikimedia Commons) Like Deal, Fort Bourtange has three layers of bastions, but they are now all at the same level (so that cannon-balls could not reach the inner layers until the outer bastions had been knocked down), made of earth banks to absorb the impact and separated by moats, as attackers would easily have climbed the ramparts – if they could have reached them. The only way across the moats is by the thin wooden drawbridges or by boat, and the plan of the fort was designed so defending cannon could ‘enfilade’ (had a clear field of fire down) each section of the moat. The careful design meant these forts could withstand long sieges – for example, Napoleon’s army never broke through the Lines of Torres Vedras in Portugal. .
Recommended publications
  • The Early Effects of Gunpowder on Fortress Design: a Lasting Impact
    The Early Effects of Gunpowder on Fortress Design: A Lasting Impact MATTHEW BAILEY COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS The introduction of gunpowder did not immediately transform the battlefields of Europe. Designers of fortifications only had to respond to the destructive threats of siege warfare, and witnessing the technical failures of early gunpowder weaponry would hardly have convinced a European magnate to bolster his defenses. This essay follows the advancement of gunpowder tactics in late medieval and early Renaissance Europe. In particular, it focuses on Edward III’s employment of primitive ordnance during the Hundred Years’ War, the role of artillery in the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople, and the organizational challenges of effectively implementing gunpowder as late as the end of the fifteenth century. This essay also seeks to illustrate the nature of the development of fortification in response to the emerging threat of gunpowder siege weaponry, including the architectural theories of the early Renaissance Italians, Henry VIII’s English artillery forts of the mid-sixteenth century, and the evolution of the angle bastion. The article concludes with a short discussion of the longevity and lasting relevance of the fortification technologies developed during the late medieval and early Renaissance eras. The castle was an inseparable component of medieval warfare. Since Duke William of Normandy’s 1066 conquest of Anglo-Saxon England, the construction of castles had become the earmark of medieval territorial expansion. These fortifications were not simply stone squares with round towers adorning the corners. Edward I’s massive castle building program in Wales, for example, resulted in fortifications so visually disparate that one might assume they were from different time periods.1 Medieval engineers had built upon castle technology for centuries by 1500, and the introduction of gunpowder weaponry to the battlefields of Europe foreshadowed a revision of the basics of fortress design.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortifications V1.0.Pdf
    “Global Command Series” Fortifications v1.0 A Global War 2nd Edition 3d Printed Expansion © Historical Board Gaming Overview This set features rules for many different types of fortifications, sold separately in 3D printed sets. These rules are written Global War - 2nd edition, however at the end of this document are a few changes necessary to play these with Global War 1st edition or Axis and Allies 1940. Set Contents Name Rules Sold Separately Atlantic Wall (German) Battery Fjell (German) Flak Tower-Small (German) Flak Tower-Large (German) Panther Turret (German) Maginot Line Turret (French) Maginot Line Gun (French) Anti-Tank Casemate (Generic) Machine Gun Pillbox (Generic) Fortifications General Rules 1. You may never have more than one of the same type of fortification in the same land zone. 2. Fortifications are removed from play if the land zone they are in is captured. 1.0 Battery Fjell – Unique coastal gun 1.0 Overview: Battery Fjell was a World War II Coastal Artillery battery installed by the Germans in occupied Norway. The 283mm (11”) guns for the battery came from the damaged battleship Gneisenau. The guns were then installed in the mountains above the island of Sotra to protect the entrance to Bergen. These modern and accurate guns had a range of 24 miles and were protected by several anti-aircraft batteries supported by air search radar. Extensive ground fortifications protected the battery as well. The battery had a crew of 250 men. The Battery Fjell unit featured in this set represents the battery itself but also a number of other defensive fortifications, garrison units and light weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Scilly
    Defending Scilly 46992_Text.indd 1 21/1/11 11:56:39 46992_Text.indd 2 21/1/11 11:56:56 Defending Scilly Mark Bowden and Allan Brodie 46992_Text.indd 3 21/1/11 11:57:03 Front cover Published by English Heritage, Kemble Drive, Swindon SN2 2GZ The incomplete Harry’s Walls of the www.english-heritage.org.uk early 1550s overlook the harbour and English Heritage is the Government’s statutory adviser on all aspects of the historic environment. St Mary’s Pool. In the distance on the © English Heritage 2011 hilltop is Star Castle with the earliest parts of the Garrison Walls on the Images (except as otherwise shown) © English Heritage.NMR hillside below. [DP085489] Maps on pages 95, 97 and the inside back cover are © Crown Copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019088. Inside front cover First published 2011 Woolpack Battery, the most heavily armed battery of the 1740s, commanded ISBN 978 1 84802 043 6 St Mary’s Sound. Its strategic location led to the installation of a Defence Product code 51530 Electric Light position in front of it in c 1900 and a pillbox was inserted into British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data the tip of the battery during the Second A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. World War. All rights reserved [NMR 26571/007] No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without Frontispiece permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Trenches in England Gazetteer Issue-01 Formatted.Xlsx
    Site Name Parish/District County NGR Description Condition References Mapping & AP Comments WWII Comments Designation Associated Files Source Aps EC Curwen air photo of practice trenches in Barbican House, Levelled by plough and some areas of scrub but Lewes. Assocacited with visible on AP and should survive. Appears to Thundersbarrow Hill Shoreham by Sea East Sussex TQ 2250 0850 Shoreham Camp overlie earlier Celtic field system on Google Earth Chasseaud 2014: Fig 2 NMP Plot + Kitchener's Camps at Seaford: A Trenches associated with First World War Landscape on Aerial Seaford Camp Seaford Head East Sussex TV 4992 9830 Kitchener Army camp. Extant, though overgrown on Google Earth Skinner 2011, pg 28 Photographs by Skinner EH Report 27/2011 Practice trenches on the side of the neck and on top of the neck Appear to be extant. Likely to be associated with Alfriston Alfriston East Sussex TQ 50918 03129 of the valley. Canadian Infantry Chasseaud 2014, pg 173 & Fig 9 Appear to be extant although some areas Chailey Common Chailey East Sussex TQ 374 208 Maze of practice trenches. overgrown. Chasseaud 2014, pg 175 & Fig 9 Practice trenches shown on aerial Exceat Exceat East Sussex TV 533 982 photographs. Not visible. Chasseaud 2014, pg 176 & Fig 9 Practice trenches shown on aerial Polegate Polegate East Sussex TQ 608 047 photographs. Not visible. Chasseaud 2014, pg 180 & Fig 9 Practice trenches including a Appear to be extant although difficult to discern Poundgate, extensive trench system on between archaeological features and trackways Ashdown Forset Poundgate East Sussex TQ 48804 29028 Poundgate Spur.
    [Show full text]
  • STORM the CASTLE.Cdr
    STORM THE CASTLE! BACKGROUND SET-UP Besides the constant strain of dealing with the Rach A game-board area of 4’x6’is recommended for this along their shared border, the Terran Federation is a frequent scenario. target of pirates and rogue military units. With an abundance The game-board will need several structures to represent of non-aligned planets spread throughout Federation space, the various walls and hardened areas used in this scenario. trying to root out these miscreants is a non-stop job that Refer to the map for building placement (see p.2) for typically falls to the Legion's lesser-known units. approximate size and elevation levels. The area around the facility has been cleared of any Castor III nearby ground cover, with only a few low-level hills to The United Terran Federation provide any protection. 9 February 2274 DEPLOYMENT Castor III is an independent world located in Federation The Defenders deploy .rst, placing their models space approximately 15 Light Years from Sol. The ocean world anywhere in Zone A while the Attackers will deploy in Zone B has several small continents scattered across the face of the using standard deployment rules. planet, with most of the population living in the southern The Defender will need to add three additional cards to hemisphere due to the massive hurricanes that frequent the the Draw Deck for the three turret“squads”detailed in the north. Special Rules & Force Group Sections. These will deploy as SyRaM has invested heavily in the world, establishing a normal, allowing the Defender to designate each turret’s large research facility on the planet focused on developing placement on the game-board.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Heritage Audit
    Binevenagh Coast and Lowlands Defence Heritage Audit (for proposed Landscape Partnership Scheme) by quarto and Ulidia Heritage Services April 2017 Contents 1. Background to the report p3 2. Research methodologies p5 3. What is the defence heritage of the Binevenagh area? 3.1. Historical overview p12 3.2. Audit of defence heritage features p15 3.3. Threats to preservation p17 4. Why is the defence heritage of the Binevenagh area important? p21 5. How do people access, learn about and participate in Binevenagh’s defence heritage now? p24 6. What opportunities and barriers exist to improving access, learning and participation? 6.1. Public access p28 6.2. Community engagement p31 6.3. Education p32 7. Project proposals 7.1. Development phase p35 7.2. Delivery phase p40 Appendices Appendix A: case studies p49 Appendix B: summary of curricula links p55 Appendix C: potential stakeholder contacts p58 Appendix D: gazetteer p62 Appendix E: references p93 * Cover image: Limavady Airfield Air Training Dome (courtesy of Causeway Coast and Glens Borough Council). 2 1. Background to the report The Causeway Coast and Glens Heritage Trust (CCGHT) promotes and develops the Causeway Coast and Glens area’s ‘scenic landscapes, important wildlife resources and… rich cultural heritage’. CCGHT encourages management of physical landscapes and their historical accretions with a view to sustainability and long-term benefit to local communities.1 CCGHT is responsible for managing the Antrim Coast and Glens Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), Causeway Coast AONB and Binevenagh AONB. The Trust has delivered a successful Landscape Partnership Scheme in Antrim Coast and Glens AONB and is now developing a similar initiative in Binevenagh AONB.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on USSR Military Forces, Chapter VI: Fortifications War Department (USA)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln DOD Military Intelligence U.S. Department of Defense 1-1946 Handbook on USSR Military Forces, Chapter VI: Fortifications War Department (USA) Robert L. Bolin , Depositor University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dodmilintel War Department (USA) and Bolin, Robert L. , Depositor, "Handbook on USSR Military Forces, Chapter VI: Fortifications" (1946). DOD Military Intelligence. 27. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dodmilintel/27 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in DOD Military Intelligence by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Technical Manual, TM 30-430 Handbook on USSR Military Forces Chapter VI Fortifications Robert L. Bolin, Depositor University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Technical Manual, TM 30-430, Chapter VI 1 January 1946 Handbook on USSR Military Forces Chapter VI Fortifications War Department Washington, DC Comments The copy digitized was borrowed from the Marshall Center Research Library, APO, AE 09053-4502. Abstract TM 30-340, Handbook on USSR Military Forces, was “published in installments to expedite dissemination to the field.” TM30-430, Chapter VI, 1 January 1946, “Fortifications,” is a detailed discussion of earthworks and structures used for defensive purposes. This chapter is illustrated with numerous drawings, diagrams, and charts. This manual is listed in WorldCat under Accession Number: OCLC: 19989681 1 Jan 46 TM 30-430 CHAPTER VI FORTIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Figure Section I.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Heritage Preservation Other Contributor(S)University of Hong Kong Author(S) Tsang, Wai-Yee; 曾惠怡 Citation Issued Date
    Title Heritage preservation Other Contributor(s) University of Hong Kong Author(s) Tsang, Wai-yee; 曾惠怡 Citation Issued Date 2009 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10722/131001 Rights Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG HERITAGE PRESERVATION: THE AFTER-USE OF MILITARY STRUCTURES IN HONG KONG A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN SURVEYING DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE AND CONSTRUCTION BY TSANG WAI YEE HONG KONG APRIL 2009 DECLARATION I declare that this dissertation represents my own work, except where due acknowledgement is made, and that it has not been previously included in a thesis, dissertation or report submitted to this University or to any other institution for a degree, diploma or other qualification. Signed: _______________________ Named: _______________________ Date: _______________________ - i - CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ......................................................................v LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................... xii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................. xiii ABSTRACT............................................................................................ xiv INTRODUCTION...................................................................................1 Research Context .................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue Download
    Catalogue 168 pages of colour rich information with an introduction by writer Charles Singleton, this supplement for Pike & Shotte describes the history, armies, personalities and battles of the English Civil War. Included are detailed scenarios based on some of the most famous battles, complete with maps and orders of battle £22.50 SEASON OF BATTLE CARD FIELD OF BATTLE etc - One 54 card deck of wargames style battlefield maps. The FOB campaign System BUT USEFUL for ANY wargamer as a random Terrain Generator . £22.50 AMERICAN CIVIL WAR SMOOTHBORE ARTILLERY (SMOOTHBORE ORDNANCE JOURNAL VOLUME 10) Summerfield, Dr S 143pp., 4to, fully illus., large format pbk 38 scale plans, 107 tables, 135 photos. of contemporary & surviving ordnance covers graphically & in detail every aspect of the vital smoothbore elements of ACW artillery. £20.00 AMERICAN REVOLUTION : THE FRENCH - COMMAND & COLOURS TRICORNE - COMPASS GAMES - - £82.50 Armies of the Medieval Italian Wars 1125-1325 - Ospery MAA 523- £10.99 ARMY OF THE DUTCH REPUBLIC, 1713-1772, PART I: INFANTRY FOR ORANGE AND THE STATES. THE - £17.50 BY FORCE OF ARMS - AUSTRIAN ARMY IN THE SEVEN YEARS WAR 2) Duffy Mint hardback £65.00 HANDBOOK OF THE BELGIAN ARMY 1914 Mint hbk facsimile of British General staff study £29.50 HUSSAR SERGEANT IN THE KING'S GERMAN LEGION: The Memoirs of Cavalry Sergeant Ebbecke, 2nd Hussar Regiment, King's German Legion 1803-15 - This short memoir of Sergeant Ludwig Ebbecke was published in German in 1851, but has never before been translated into English. He served at Stralsund, the Siege of Copenhagen in 1807, and was nearly shipwrecked on the passage back to Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Structures Listing Selection Guides Summary
    Military Structures Listing Selection Guides Summary Historic England’s twenty listing selection guides help to define which historic buildings are likely to meet the relevant tests for national designation and be included on the National Heritage List for England. Listing has been in place since 1947 and operates under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. If a building is felt to meet the necessary standards, it is added to the List. This decision is taken by the Government’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). These selection guides were originally produced by English Heritage in 2011: slightly revised versions are now being published by its successor body, Historic England. The DCMS‘ Principles of Selection for Listing Buildings set out the over-arching criteria of special architectural or historic interest required for listing and the guides provide more detail of relevant considerations for determining such interest for particular building types. See https:// www.gov.uk/government/publications/principles-of-selection-for-listing-buildings. Each guide falls into two halves. The first defines the types of structures included in it, before going on to give a brisk overview of their characteristics and how these developed through time, with notice of the main architects and representative examples of buildings. The second half of the guide sets out the particular tests in terms of its architectural or historic interest a building has to meet if it is to be listed. A select bibliography gives suggestions for further reading. This guide outlines our approaches to listing England’s military buildings and structures, some of the most eloquent witnesses to the impact of world events on our national story.
    [Show full text]
  • Forptursburr ALTMAN, Mayor Fire- Six Circle Crackers Cootiette Club—Uniforms Dupont Requested
    VFW passengers have more than two or- Department dinary pieces of baggage. The Armistice The Traveler's Notebook action was taken to protect against Day Ball; delays and losses and avoid conges- 50 Per Cent of Winter Residents Arriving at St. Petersburg; tion or Inconvenience and hazard Germans Defy Post Activities to others. Maryland Noted for Its Colonial a a * * Frank Topash, junior vice com- Many Churches; Now that the ban on Nazi Order to Resist Allies mander of the District of Columbia White Mountain Resorts Late sporting Enjoying Season ammunition has been lifted by IRA the resistance and the Department, Veterans of Foreign By WOLFERT, evacuation Winter residents of Peters- of WPB, hunters are cautioned to North American Newspaper Alliance. Wars, is chairman for the 8|. its type In the Nation, has been orders and has remained quietly at general learn season” which annual Armistice Ball, Novem- burg, Fla. have arrived in consid- under the control of the mountain “open dates, INSIDE CONQUERED GER- home. Day are in states. ber at the Willard with erable numbers to enter their chil- people themselves and being changed many MANY, Sept. 23.—Although there Is Among the farmers almost none 11, Hotel, sponsored by' dren in the city’s famous open-air the Asheville Chamber of Com- Throughout the nation, an esti- no militant anti-Nazi either Ida Emmert of the-Ladies’ Auxiliary apparently obeyed order, except the and merce. mate of 10 cent increase in Ach- as assistant. schools—public, private paro- Interest in the festival, since per feeling among the 50,000 German youths who were forcibly mobilized.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeologist 75
    Spring 2010 Number 75 The ARCHAEOLOGIST This issue: ARCHAEOLOGY IN WALES The Welsh Uplands Initiative p9 Heather, hillforts and agri- environment p26 A Roman fortress and the Ryder Cup p30 Reviving Cardigan p48 C ONTENTS 1 Contents 2 Editorial 3 IfA and planning policy in England Peter Hinton 4 From the Finds Tray page 12 6 IfA Annual Conference 2010 8 Conservation Principles: policies and guidance for the sustainable management of the historic environment in Wales Kate Geary 9 The Welsh Uplands Initiative Paul Sambrook and Jenny Hall 10 Aerial reconnaissance in Wales Toby Driver 12 Scheduling ancient monuments in Wales Jon Berry 14 Pan-Wales projects: recording the whole archaeological heritage Ken Murphy and Bob Silvester 16 Fields of Conflict: an historic battlefields register for Wales Gwilym Hughes and Jon Berry 18 Urban characterisation in Wales Judith Alfrey 20 Exploration Tywi! Community investigation of an historic landscape Louise Austin and Alice Pyper 22 Rock art research comes to Wales George Nash 24 Investigating Iron Age defended settlements in south west Wales Ken Murphy page 22 26 Heather, hillforts and agri-environment Helen Mrowiec 28 Dinas Dinlle: erosion and conservation John Latham 30 A Roman fortress and the Ryder Cup Andrew Marvell 32 Looking for King Harold (but finding something else) Mark Brett and Mark Collard 34 Caring for the castles of Wales’ native princes Gwilym Hughes 36 Close to the edge: coastal erosion and early medieval cemeteries in Pembrokeshire Duncan Schlee 37 Bricks and mortar: post-medieval
    [Show full text]