Acknowledgements
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ACRAWSA e-journal, Vol. 2 , No. 1, 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My thanks go first and foremost to the contributors and the referees. This issue exists be- cause of the quality and range of contributions and the willingness of the contributors to engage with feedback and revise their work. The individuals who refereed the essays did so on tight timelines generously offering constructive responses, suggestions and insights. I am very grateful for their collaboration in the process of putting together this issue. I would also like to thank the national executive of ACRAWSA for supporting this issue and the editing process. I would like to especially thank Jane Haggis for her timely suggestions and Damien Riggs for developing the templates for the journal, his technical expertise and responding instantly to all moments of panic in the process of preparing the copy for publication. I would also like to thank Aileen Moreton-Robinson and Fiona Nicoll for their support and advice. Maryrose Casey ISSN 1832-3898 © Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association 2006 ACRAWSA e-journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2006 WHITENESS & THE HORIZONS OF RACE MARYROSE CASEY The ACRAWSA Journal is a forum for the gated. In Britain critical race and white- growing network of researchers who , as ness studies are primarily focused on the ACRAWSA website states : postcolonial migrations to Britain particu- larly the reaction to, and the framing of, ‘recognise that whiteness operates immigration by those from former colo- through institutions, ideology and identity nies not usually included within the des- formation to secure political, legal and ignation ‘white’. In Australia, critical writ- economic privileges for white people as ings engage with migration, Indigenous a collective leaving many Indigenous dispossession and whiteness. The acts of and other people racialised as 'non white' collectively disadvantaged and colonisation and dispossession and their dispossessed of material, cultural and in- traces in the present are a primary focus tellectual resources’. of the research and scholarship. This whiteness is the invisible norm that is The first issue of this journal produced by implicit in constructions of identities, rep- ACRAWSA in 2005 featured important resentations, subjectivities nationalisms and well-known contributors to the field and legal systems (Allen 1994; Dyer 1997; of critical race and whiteness studies. Frankenberg 1993). The scholarship sup- The current issue is focused on new and ported and promoted by ACRAWSA fo- emerging voices in the field of critical cuses on a number of key elements. race and whiteness studies. The essays These include recognition and respect are drawn from papers presented at the for the existence and continuing rights Whiteness and the Horizons of Race con- derived from indigenous sovereignties in ference in Brisbane in December 2005. Australia and elsewhere, and the task of critically investigating, exposing and Moreton-Robinson, as convener of the challenging the construction and main- conference, put out a call for papers tenance of hierarchies of race through arguing that the practices of white privilege. ‘an academic conference on the his- As Aileen Moreton-Robinson has argued torical, social, political, cultural, eco- so persuasively, the focus of Australian nomic and discursive construction of race and whiteness can make an impor- critical race and whiteness studies ex- tant contribution to broader public de- tends the critical engagement prac- bates, providing the opportunity to ex- ticed in British and American studies (viii). amine popular understandings of race In America, critical race and whiteness and whiteness evaluating the ways in scholarship effectively locates the field which current and historical debates are primarily in relation to the development and have taken shape’ (Horizons of and practices of the enslavement of Af- Race 2005a). ricans within the American continent and to a lesser extent with immigration o This call was in the context of her argu- different ethnic groups. The dispossession ment that the discourses of Race and of Native Americans and the practices Whiteness are : of colonisation tend to be uninterro- ISSN 1832-3898 © Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association 2006 CASEY: EDITORIAL inextricably connected to the formation race and whiteness studies being ac- and politics of modern nation states and tively created within academia . the communities which inhabit their terri- tories shaping identity, representation, The number of publications engaging subjectivity, nationalism and institutions with whiteness in Australia is growing, led such as the law. by publications such as Moreton- As Moreton-Robinson and the organising Robinson’s monograph Talkin’ Up to the committee, including Fiona Nicoll and White Woman (2000) and her edited myself hoped, the conference was an collection of essays from a range of interdisciplinary project with contribu- academics in the field, Whitening Race tions from sociologists, social anthro- (2004). Other publications over the last pologists, political scientists, psycholo- few of years include books such War- gists, economists, literary scholars, legal wick Anderson’s The Cultivation of scholars, media scholars, philosophers, Whiteness: science, health and racial historians, and scholars from wide rang- destiny in Australia (MUP, 2005), Tanya ing fields such as performance, feminist, Dalziell’s Settler Romances and the Aus- Indigenous, multicultural, Australian and tralian Girl (UWA Press, 2004). There are also multiple examples of essays by Aus- cultural studies. The keynote speakers were Professor David Roedigger, Dr tralians engaging in whiteness studies Wendy Brady, Dr Suvendrini Perera and included in international publications Professor Marilyn Lake. The numerous such as Changing Law: rights regulation panel sessions included explorations of and reconciliation (Ashgate, 2005) and the dynamic relationship between Critics and Writers Speak: revisioning whiteness and the law, the politics of post-colonial studies (Lexington Books, performativity, the boundaries of toler- 2006). Further extending the field are ance, history and historiography, fic- forthcoming books, such as Damien tional narratives, multiculturalism, the Riggs’ Taking up the Challenge: critical framing of the domestic, terrorism and whiteness studies and indigenous Sover- the war on terror, religion and compas- eignty , and Aileen Moreton-Robinson’s sion, the visual and performing arts (Hori- collection on Indigenous sovereignty. zons of Race 2005b). Supporting these there are journals such as the ACRAWSA Journal and Border- The conference was remarkable for a lands . number of reasons. Not the least of which were the range of disciplines en- Conferences are also playing an impor- gaged in direct dialogue and ex- tant role in developing and supporting change. Another remarkable feature of the field with published outcomes of the conference was the supportive and conference proceedings such as Plac- open atmosphere that gave the pro- ing Race and Localising Whiteness (Flin- ceedings a sense of community and ders University, 2004) edited by Susanne freedom that supported social and cul- Schech and Ben Wadham. tural exchange as well as academic ar- gument and debate. Another striking The number of conferences and semi- feature of the conference was the high nars focused on whiteness studies is in- level of involvement from post-graduate creasing. This year there are a number of students and early career researchers. In conferences focusing on the critical some ways the involvement of such high framework of whiteness including the numbers of new and emerging scholars Borderpolitics of Whiteness Conference reflects the increasing intellectual space to be held in Sydney, December 11-13, for research and scholarship in critical and Historicising Whiteness, to be held in 2 CASEY: EDITORIAL Melbourne, November 22-24. The Bor- that strengthen and maintain white- derpolitics of Whiteness Conference is nesses as a justification for colonising an ACRAWSA event. The keynote and racist actions. Fiona Nicoll in her edi- speakers will include Professor Aileen torial of the inaugural issue of the Moreton-Robinson, Professor of Indige- ACRAWSA journal identified a challenge nous Studies at Queensland University of facing Australian critics. She wrote that Technology, Professor David Theo Gold- “we need to register an important shift in berg, Director, University of California the meanings attached to ‘whiteness’, Humanities Research Institute, Professor ‘race’ and ‘racism’ under John How- Cheryl Harris, Law, University of Califor- ard’s prime ministership” (1) This is a chal- nia, Los Angeles and Associate Professor lenge with which many of the essays in Joseph Pugliese, Critical and Cultural this issue directly engage. The contribu- Studies, Macquarie University. tors essays engage with both the broader issues of whiteness historically Further developing and supporting the and the immediate shifts in the recent growing interest in whiteness studies past whilst focusing on specific expres- there are courses at universities that fo- sions and practices of whiteness. cus on critical race and whiteness stud- ies such as those taught by Damien Satoshi Mizutani is an Assistant Professor Riggs at the University of South Australia at the Institute for Language and Cul- and Jane Carey at the University of Mel- ture, Doshisha University (Kyoto, Japan). bourne. Mizutani is currently