Fostering the Catholic Cultural Ties Between the Netherlands And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fostering the Catholic Cultural Ties Between the Netherlands And Fostering the Catholic cultural ties between the Netherlands and Flanders A study on the reflections of the Dutch Catholic intellectuals involved in the periodical ‘De Beiaard’ regarding the First World War and its outcome Research Master Thesis in Historical Studies Supervised by Dr Jan Brabers Christoph van den Belt s4037146 Radboud University [email protected] 12th of August, 2016 Diese Masterarbeit ist meinen lieben Großeltern Ursula und Georg Hohmann aus Weimar gewidmet 1 ‘Ich wollte einfach alles wissen.’ (Professor Dr.-Ing. habil. Georg Hohmann – mein Großvater) ‘Ik heb aan ’t eind van een studie altijd angst, niet genoeg gedocumenteerd te zijn, een soort examenvrees om nog een en ander en alles tegelijk na te slaan.’ (Gerard Brom) 2 Table of contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1 – Status Quaestionis ............................................................................................................ 8 The Dutch ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Dutch Catholics ................................................................................................................................. 10 Dutch intellectuals ............................................................................................................................. 12 Catholic intellectuals ......................................................................................................................... 13 The journal De Beiaard ..................................................................................................................... 15 The ideal of the Greater Netherlands ................................................................................................. 17 Research problem and terminology ................................................................................................... 20 Catholic intellectuals ..................................................................................................................... 21 Network ......................................................................................................................................... 22 Censorship ..................................................................................................................................... 22 Fitting in the sources ......................................................................................................................... 24 Chapter 2 – Reflections on the war .................................................................................................... 27 Theme I – Dutch politics ................................................................................................................... 27 1.1 Neutrality ................................................................................................................................. 28 1.2 Freedom ................................................................................................................................... 30 Theme II – International solidarity .................................................................................................... 33 2.1 Self-determination ................................................................................................................... 33 2.2 The Belgian government ......................................................................................................... 35 2.3 The Belgian Episcopate ........................................................................................................... 36 2.4 The Flemish Question.............................................................................................................. 38 2.5 The Polish Question ................................................................................................................ 39 Theme III – War ................................................................................................................................ 41 3.1 War, literature and architecture ............................................................................................... 41 3.2 War and science ....................................................................................................................... 43 3.3 The just war ............................................................................................................................. 44 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 46 Chapter 3 – Reflections on the outcome of war ................................................................................ 48 Theme I – Literary relations .............................................................................................................. 48 1.1 War? ........................................................................................................................................ 50 Theme II – Belgian demands ............................................................................................................. 51 2.1 Historical context .................................................................................................................... 52 2.2 Correspondence ....................................................................................................................... 53 3 2.3 Willem Mulder SJ ................................................................................................................... 54 2.4 Joseph Schrijnen ...................................................................................................................... 55 2.5 Henricus Huijbers .................................................................................................................... 56 Theme III – Socialism and Catholics ................................................................................................ 58 3.1 Ambivalence? .......................................................................................................................... 59 Theme IV – Germany ........................................................................................................................ 60 4.1 The flight of the Emperor ........................................................................................................ 60 4.2 The future of Germany ............................................................................................................ 62 Theme V – Catholics and the future .................................................................................................. 63 5.1 Lack of articles ........................................................................................................................ 66 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 67 Epilogue ................................................................................................................................................ 69 Archival sources .................................................................................................................................. 72 De Beiaard ......................................................................................................................................... 72 Archief G.B. Brom en W.J. Brom-Struick ........................................................................................ 72 Archief J.H.E.J. Hoogveld ................................................................................................................. 73 Archief Steenhoff, P.H.J. en Smulders, Albertine ............................................................................. 73 Knipselcollectie KDC ........................................................................................................................ 73 Internet sources ................................................................................................................................... 74 Cited works .......................................................................................................................................... 74 4 Introduction Why would anyone want to study the history of Dutch Catholics during the First World War? Historian James Kennedy, while writing about religion in Dutch society and culture, provides a possible answer, which lies at the basis of this research. According to him, Dutch society is characterised by discontinuity, in which it differs from the North American society. He provocatively argues that the pre-1940 Dutch society seems to him as far removed from the present as the Neolithic era. Perhaps, Kennedy continues, the rapidly succeeding societal developments of the twentieth century gave many Dutch people the impression that the past consists of worlds, convictions and ideas, which are interesting to the Dutch people, but are irrelevant to the modern world. They have simply not withstood the ravages of time. As a consequence, Kennedy claims, the Catholic world of one hundred years ago is almost completely forgotten by the majority of the Dutch people.1 Historian Peter Raedts also discusses where this ignorance regarding the confessional
Recommended publications
  • Belgian Internationalists, the Great War and the Quest for Peace Daniel Laqua
    Belgian Internationalists, the Great War and the Quest for Peace Daniel Laqua To cite this version: Daniel Laqua. Belgian Internationalists, the Great War and the Quest for Peace . Marie-Louise Pelus- Kaplan, Anne-Marie Bernon-Gerth, Liliane Crips et Nicole Gabriel. Être citoyen du monde. Entre destruction et reconstruction du monde : les enfants de Babel XIVe-XXIe siècles, Édition Université Paris Diderot, pp.135-150, 2015, 978-2-7442-0198-1. hal-01322633 HAL Id: hal-01322633 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01322633 Submitted on 27 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. DANIEL LAQUA1 BELGIAN INTERNATIONALISTS, THE GREAT WAR AND THE QUEST FOR PEACE In 1932, Henri Pirenne – widely renowned for his work on medieval towns – published the final part of his Histoire de Belgique. The first instalment of his magnum opus had appeared more than three decades earlier and tackled a period long before Belgium’s independent statehood, from Antiquity to end of the High Middle Ages2. It was only with volume VII that Pirenne finally reached the era since the Belgian Revolution of 1830. The account drew a wider picture of the country before the First World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Willem De Prater Tijn Sinke
    Willem de Prater Karel de Wijkerslooth de Weerdesteyn en collaboratie tijdens de Tweede Wereldoorlog Tijn Sinke Eindwerkstuk Onderzoeksseminar III: Biografisch Project Docent: Geraldien von Frijtag Drabbe Kunzel Studentnummer: 3488764 Datum: 13-06-2013 1 Inhoudsopgave Inleiding 3 1 De roep om vernieuwing 7 2 De van Hogendorp van 1940 staat op 16 3 Radicalisering en teleurstelling binnen de NSB 28 4 Mea culpa 37 Conclusie 44 Noten 48 Bibliografie 53 Illustratie op voorblad: Karel de Wijkerslooth de Weerdesteyn, http://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=urn:gvn:KDC01:TF2A10758&role=image&size=medium (bezocht: 09-06-2013) 2 Inleiding Onder het kopje ‘een pathologisch geval’ besteedt Lou de Jong in deel 4 van zijn monumentale werk over Nederland in de Tweede Wereldoorlog één bladzijde aan een ‘geestelijk-gestoorde ex-burgemeester’.1 De man in kwestie is Karel baron de Wijkerslooth de Weerdesteyn. Deze adellijke katholiek was van februari tot juli 1940 burgemeester van Hilversum. Volgens de Jong had hij zich rond de Duitse inval in mei ‘flink gedragen’.2 In juli stapte hij echter op omdat hij meende dat Nederland hem nodig had als toekomstig politiek leider. Het aantal reacties op zijn beweging Nationale Eenheid stelde echter teleur; eind 1940 gooide De Wijkerslooth de handdoek in de ring en trad toe tot de NSB. De Wijkerslooth komt in het beknopte stuk dat de Jong aan hem wijdt over als een nogal tragisch, aan grootheidswaanzin lijdend figuur. Dit beeld wordt bevestigd door het psychiatrische rapport dat op instigatie van de Bijzondere Rechtspleging na de oorlog werd opgesteld. De Wijkerslooth stond terecht voor steun aan de vijand, want hij was lid geweest van de NSB, had blijk gegeven van nationaal-socialistische gezindheid én had in het Nederlandse Legioen aan het oostfront gevochten.
    [Show full text]
  • Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~ X X X X X X X X X X X X JAARGANG X 1935 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X. X X X X X X X X JAARBERICHT A X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3'ASCISTISCKE EN X X X X X NATIONAAL-SOCIALISTISCHE X X X X ORGANIC. .TIES X X - X X X X X * X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ti X x X X X X X X X X X GEHEIM X X X X X X X X X xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 1935 Hoofdstuk II'JHOTJD Bladz. A . Fascistische - en Prationaal Socia- listische Organisaties (Overzicht) l. B.l Nationaal Socialistische Beweging . (N.S.R.) ........................ 4. B.2 Nationaal Socia list is che Neder - landsche Arbeiders Partij (N.S.N.A,F,) C .... ICruyt ....... 14. B *3 Neder landseh Vo lksfasc i sme "Zw8r t Front" (Arnold Meyer) ........... 16. B .4 Nederlandsch Volksfascisme (N.V.F.) L. Felten ........................ 17 - B.5. Verbond van Dietsch Nationaal Soli- daristen (Verdinaso) .............. 10. €3.6 Nederïandsche Socialistische Partij (N.S .P.) .......................... 19 B .7 Nu$io~nal- Socialistische Neder- landsche Arbeiders Partij (N.S.N.A.F.) Dr. 3. Ridder van Rappard ......... 20. B.8 Verbond van Vrienden van Duitschland (V.V.D.) .......................... 20. -0-0-0-0-0-0-0-00 U -JAhRBER 1CIIT -A Februari --1935. FACC I STISCHE- en NAT I OXAAL-- - SOC IALISTIS CHE ORGANISATIES.
    [Show full text]
  • Discord & Consensus
    c Discor Global Dutch: Studies in Low Countries Culture and History onsensus Series Editor: ulrich tiedau DiscorD & Discord and Consensus in the Low Countries, 1700–2000 explores the themes D & of discord and consensus in the Low Countries in the last three centuries. consensus All countries, regions and institutions are ultimately built on a degree of consensus, on a collective commitment to a concept, belief or value system, 1700–2000 TH IN IN THE LOW COUNTRIES, 1700–2000 which is continuously rephrased and reinvented through a narrative of cohesion, and challenged by expressions of discontent and discord. The E history of the Low Countries is characterised by both a striving for consensus L and eruptions of discord, both internally and from external challenges. This OW volume studies the dynamics of this tension through various genres. Based C th on selected papers from the 10 Biennial Conference of the Association OUNTRI for Low Countries Studies at UCL, this interdisciplinary work traces the themes of discord and consensus along broad cultural, linguistic, political and historical lines. This is an expansive collection written by experts from E a range of disciplines including early-modern and contemporary history, art S, history, film, literature and translation from the Low Countries. U G EDIT E JANE FENOULHET LRICH is Professor of Dutch Studies at UCL. Her research RDI QUIST AND QUIST RDI E interests include women’s writing, literary history and disciplinary history. BY D JAN T I GERDI QUIST E is Lecturer in Dutch and Head of Department at UCL’s E DAU F Department of Dutch.
    [Show full text]
  • Activisme | International Encyclopedia of the First World
    Activisme By Antoon Vrints A minority of the adherents of the Flemish movement were willing to collaborate with the German occupier in the context of Flamenpolitik. This minority labelled themselves “activists”, stressing their dislike of the Belgian patriotic truce. Table of Contents 1 Definition 2 Debate 3 Impact Selected Bibliography Citation Definition The term “activisme” refers to the part of the Flemish Movement that was willing to collaborate politically with the German occupier in Belgium during the First World War. Both the perspectives offered by the German Flamenpolitik and the fulfilment of the Flemish movement’s pre-war demands – in fact, far beyond what was originally demanded – were decisive in this regard. The fraction was referred to as “activist” since it was willing to break with the Belgian patriotic truce in contrast to the majority of the adherents of the Flemish movement, who remained loyal to the Belgian state. Activisme represented a double watershed in the history of the Flemish Movement. It not only initiated anti-Belgian Flemish nationalism as a political current, but also heralded the beginning of authoritarianism within the Flemish Movement. The “activist” political collaboration was intrinsically authoritarian, since it wanted to use the German force’s presence (including violence, if needed) to impose its program on the unwilling Flemish population that first and foremost wanted the departure of the repressive occupation regime. This was in contrast to the flamingants (adherents of the Flemish movement), such as the Catholic politician Frans van Cauwelaert (1880-1961), who did not want to isolate themselves from the population and therefore remained loyal to the Belgian state; they wanted to implement the Flemish movement’s program by parliamentary, democratic means.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruno De Wever the FLEMISH MOVEMENT and FLEMISH NATIONALISM INSTRUMENTS, HISTORIOGRAPH
    Bruno De Wever THE FLEMISH MOVEMENT AND FLEMISH NATIONALISM INSTRUMENTS, HISTORIOGRAPHY AND DEBATES The historiography of the Flemish movement and the Belgian nationality conflict is very extensive and diverse. The seven-part Bibliografie van de Vlaamse beweging (Bibliography of the Flemish movement) on the years 1945 to 2001 contains almost 20,000 titles.1 Although by far not all titles are scientific and historiographical, it says something about the extent of the production. It is obviously impossible to strive for completeness in the few words of this article. I will limit myself to the main working instruments with which I also address the scientific infrastructure. Furthermore I provide an overview of the basic works and the most significant literature in English, French and German. Finally I give a concise overview of the smouldering historiographical debates. Instruments Jo Tollebeek, one of the most important connoisseurs of the Belgian historiographical production, concludes that from the 1970s on quantitative as well as qualitative research increased greatly as the result of a process of professionalisation and the development of an infrastructure specifically focused on the study of the history of the Flemish movement.2 Bruno De Wever, ‘The Flemish movement and Flemish nationalism. Instruments, historiography and debates’, in: Studies on National Movements, 1 (2013) pp. 50-80. http://snm.nise.eu Studies on National Movements, 1 (2013) | ARTICLES The input of the Flemish universities was very important in this regard. Broadly speaking, from the 1960s on and culminating in the years 1970- 1980, hundreds of dissertations and dozens of doctoral theses on the Flemish movement were written in the history departments of Belgian universities.3 The above-mentioned Bibliografie van de Vlaamse beweging offers a voluminous but rather unselective overview of the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Frans Van Cauwelaert. Zijn Plaats in De Vlaamse Natievorming
    Frans van Cauwelaert. Zijn plaats in de Vlaamse natievorming door Lode WILS Summary Frans van Cauwelaert, a Member of Parliament for Antwerp, was in 1910-1935 the dominant figure in the Flemish Movement. He realized the full equality of Flanders and Wallonia on the basis of the monolingual status of each region. From 1970 on, this led to the devolution of power to the regions. Frans van Cauwelaert (1880-1961) staat vooral bekend als de auteur van de wetgeving die, tussen beide Wereldoorlogen, het eentalig Nederlands karakter van Vlaanderen heeft vastgelegd in het onderwijs, het bestuur, het gerecht en het leger. Zelf was hij een product van de Vlaamse beweging die hem voorafging, zoals hij een grondslag legde voor de Vlaamse Gemeenschap en het Gewest, die pas na zijn dood werden gevormd. 1. EEN VLAAMSE BEWEGING De Vlaamse beweging ontstond uit het enthousiasme van de Belgische Revolutie die in 1830, als een van de eerste in Europa, de omvorming in een moderne natiestaat voltooide van de Zuid­ Nederlandse en Luikse protonaties. De beweging voor het alzijdig gebruik van "de landstaal" als bestuurs- en cultuurtaal was een onderdeel van een algemeen cultureel reveil dat ook de nationale kunst en literatuur wilde stimuleren, de vaderlandse geschiedenis bestuderen en verheerlijken. De volkstaal werd daarbij gezien als een symbool van vrijheid en nationaliteit. Zoals in de meeste kleine taalgebieden van Europa, waren het vooral de godsdienstig georiënteerde en conservatieve groepen die de volkstaal wilden gebruiken als bestuurs- en cultuurtaal. Want zij zagen haar als drager van de nationale traditie die sinds eeuwen met de godsdienst verstrengeld was.
    [Show full text]
  • Het Clandestiene Boek 1940-1945
    Het clandestiene boek 1940-1945 Lisette Lewin bron Lisette Lewin, Het clandestiene boek 1940-1945. Van Gennep, Amsterdam 1983 (tweede druk) Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/lewi001clan01_01/colofon.htm © 2008 dbnl / Lisette Lewin 7 Inleiding In Harlingen stond in 1567 een zeventienjarige jongen terecht. Het was de tijd van de opstand die zou uitgroeien tot de oorlog die als de Tachtigjarige de geschiedenis is ingegaan. De jongen had in Kampen in grote oplage drie geuzenliederen gekocht en was daarmee de boer op gegaan. Van de opbrengst had hij er in Steenwijk weer drie laten drukken; duizend exemplaren voor een carolusgulden. Ook hiermee had hij rondgereisd en daarbij zijn koopwaar uit volle borst aangeprezen. In de bezettingstijd van toen waren geuzenliedekens enorm populair - een bundel van die liederen die in 1581 verscheen is tot 1648 zeker twintig maal herdrukt. Illegaal drukwerk was een gevreesd wapen van het verzet, vooral vlugschriften. ‘Es ist’ verzekert Friedrich Schiller ons in zijn Geschichte des Abfalls der vereinigten Niederlande von der spanischen Regierung, ‘merkwürdig was für eine grosse Rolle die Buchdruckkunst und Publizität überhaupt bei dem niederländischen Aufruhr gespielt hat.’ De informatie over het bovengenoemde Harlingse proces heb ik uit J. Romeins bijdrage aan De Tachtigjarige Oorlog van B.W. Schaper. Het voorval biedt aanknopingspunten voor een boek over de clandestiene uitgeverij in bezet Nederland tussen 1940 en 1945 en in algemenere zin voor beschouwingen over het letterkundig klimaat in die jaren. In de oorlog zijn er van bundels geuzenliederen minstens vijfendertigduizend exemplaren gedrukt en verspreid, met oude succesnummers als het Wilhelmus aangevuld met eigentijdser werk.
    [Show full text]
  • Het Schandaal Van De Bank
    Sap versus van Zeeland: politieke titanen kruisen de degens in de jaren '30 KAREL VAN NIEUWENHUYSE doctorandus geschiedenis, K. U. Leuven _______________________________________ wetenschappelijk medewerker afdeling politologie In de literatuur omtrent het interbellum wordt heel dikwijls verwezen naar het conflict tussen Gustaaf Sap, West-Vlaams politicus en eigenaar van het dagblad De Standaard, en Paul Van Zeeland, achtereenvolgens directeur en vice-gouverneur bij de Nationale Bank van België en tussen maart 1935 en oktober 1937 premier. De twist tussen beide tenoren deed toentertijd heel wat stof opwaaien, en leidde zelfs tot de val van de tweede regering-Van Zeeland. Op de redenen en achtergronden ervan werd totnogtoe evenwel haast nog nooit ingegaan.1 Steevast wordt het conflict afgedaan als ontsproten uit de grenzeloze persoonlijke afkeer van Sap voor zijn opponent Van Zeeland. In deze studie willen wij in eerste instantie een verloop van het conflict bieden, waarbij we de nadruk leggen op het hoogtepunt ervan gedurende de tweede regering-Van Zeeland. Toch zien wij ons genoodzaakt een relatief grote omweg te maken via de sterlingkwestie over de regering-de Broqueville t.e.m. de eerste regering-Van Zeeland. Dergelijke historische tour d'horizon lijkt ons immers noodzakelijk om tot een betere en juistere perceptie van het conflict te komen. Daarnaast trachten we te peilen naar de diepere oorzaken die aan de basis lagen van de tweespalt. 1. DE WORTELS VAN HET CONFLICT: VAN DE STERLINGKWESTIE (1931-'32) TOT DE VERKIEZINGEN VAN MEI 1936 1.1. Van stabilisatie naar sterlingkwestie (1925/'26-1932) 1. Twee uitzonderingen hierop vormen het werk van Durnez over De Standaard en het artikel van Gerard over Gustaaf Sap.
    [Show full text]
  • The Left and Flemish Nationalism: Living Apart Together in Belgium Bruno De Wever Bad Timing
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography The Left and Flemish Nationalism: Living Apart Together in Belgium Bruno de Wever Only time will tell to what extent the electoral victory of the nationalist New Flemish Alliance [N-VA] in 2010 and the institutional crisis that followed were a turning point in the political emancipation of Flanders. But it is clear that times have changed and the end of the Belgian state is no longer considered a piece of political science fiction. Nevertheless, the Left in Flanders continues to behave as it always has for over a century during which it has defined the demand for greater Flemish independence as a right-wing project that deserves no sympathy from social democrats. Why is that? Bad Timing Nation formation as such is not a right-wing project. In the 18th and 19th centuries, when most of the European nations emerged, nationalism was often an emancipating force directed against the Ancien Régime in favour of equal rights for all citizens. In the 20th century, nationalism was one of the driving forces behind decolonisation, directed against the exploitation of non-Western societies. Nation formation and nationalism must be seen in their historical context. The Czech historian, Miroslav Hroch’s model of nationalism offers a framework that throws light on why the Left has not played an active role in Flemish Nationalism. Hroch developed his theory of small nation-formation in the 1960s. Wider academic acclaim followed after an English translation appeared in the 1980s1 and the validity of his model is now universally accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Vrij vissen in het Vondelpark. Kleine politieke partijen in Nederland 1918-1940 Vossen, K.P.S.S. Publication date 2003 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Vossen, K. P. S. S. (2003). Vrij vissen in het Vondelpark. Kleine politieke partijen in Nederland 1918-1940. Wereldbibliotheek. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:06 Oct 2021 HOOFDSTUKK 5 Hett radicale alternatief Dee revolutionaire partijen Dee democratie leek in het begin van de jaren twintig de grote winnaar. In zijnn in 1921 verschenen boek Modern Democracies sprak de Britse staats- rechtgeleerdee James Bryce zelfs over de 'universal acceptance of democracy ass the normal and natural form of government'.1 Waren na de Eerste We- reldoorlogg niet de laatste autocratische grootmachten verdwenen? Waren zijj niet bijna overal - behalve dan in het verre Rusland waar de bolsjewisten dee macht hadden gegrepen - vervangen door nieuwe democratieën? Was err niet een Volkenbond waarin deze democratische regimes op vreedzame wijzee hun conflicten konden oplossen? Het optimisme van Bryce werd door velenn onderschreven.
    [Show full text]
  • Zaalteksten En.Indd
    city and university since 1817 ENgallery texts downloadable from www.stamgent.be please drop me in the box as you leave city and since 1817 university October 9th 1817 saw the ceremonious opening of the university in Ghent. Since that day back in 1817 the university has become firmly embedded in the city and is now an unmissable part of the street­ scape. Students live here, hurry by bicycle from one building to another and also take advantage of the university city’s vibrant nightlife. Campuses are expanding and a fourth tower has appeared on the skyline, the Book Tower. The exhibition looks back at the inter­ action between city and university over the last 200 years. It also looks to the future. ‘City and University. Since 1817’ is a STAM exhibition about the university, the city and above all about their coexistence — yesterday, today and tomorrow. 2 1 ] a university The Belgian Revolution in August for ghent 1830 was the start of a chaotic period. Two of the four faculties In 1817 Ghent acquired were scrapped and Orangist Ghent a university. At the time Ghent feared for its university. The uncer­ — like the rest of what is tainty came to an end in Septem­ today Belgium — was part ber 1835: Ghent would retain of the United Kingdom its university, with four faculties. of the Netherlands. In 1815, at the beginning of 1.01 ] The early days the newly created United Kingdom of the university of the Netherlands, education in the south was in a sorry state, On November 3rd 1817 classes having been badly neglected.
    [Show full text]