DOCSLIB.ORG

2014.06 Choctaw Resistance to Removal From

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BISKINIK | June 2014 9 Choctaw resistance to removal from ancient homeland In May 2014, Editor’s Note: This lives by hundreds of joining the Choctaw people month’s Iti Fabvssa is Red Sticks in met at Wheelock part one in a four-part their fight Academy to installment. against the Iti Fabυssa commemorate the Americans. sacrifices made by ancestors who, many Among them generations ago, came to what is now were 30 Choctaw warriors from the Yan- and their warriors to Oklahoma on the Trail of Tears. Removing nubbe town who followed Talan Bola, a surround the Fort and from an ancient homeland that literally was Muscogee Red Stick Chief. Later Choctaw wait. As the Muscogee (and continues to be) an important part of warriors from the town of Patchelchovoka surrounded the fort on Choctaw culture and identity was not an easy also joined the Red Sticks (Halbert n.d.). three sides the Fort’s thing for these ancestors to do, nor was Based in the Black Warrior River valley, defenders shot back, but surviving the Trail of Tears itself. While these small Choctaw forces raided local without effect; they did not walking the Trail of Tears commemorative American frontier settlements. have the training to walk, and placing oneself in the footsteps of The motivation of these Choctaw people to properly aim and fire the those who walked the original Trail of Tears, join the Red Sticks and fight against other cannons that lined the fort. it would be difficult to not reflect on the Choctaws has not been recorded. However, Clinch sent McIntosh to thoughts, motivations, and feelings that were based on Tecumseh’s recorded speeches at demand the surrender. The carried by those people 180 years ago. As the Choctaw villages, it would seem that they fort’s leaders refused and miles wore on, one may wonder things like: took up arms to proactively face a foe that hoisted a red flag with an Did any Choctaw people come to Oklahoma was steadily pushing Native American English jack on it, indicat- willingly? How much coercion was involved? groups out of their homelands. The feelings ing that they would die Did any Choctaw people resist removal, and of these Choctaw individuals were strong rather than surrender. The if so, how did they? enough that they were willing to go against next morning, soon after The answers to all of these questions are their own leaders in taking up arms against artillery fire began, complex and almost as varied as the different the United States. It was an early and very America forces fired a personalities of the families and individuals direct form of resistance against Removal. round of heated shot over who found themselves living in the very Pro-American Choctaw forces entered the the wall and hit the Fort’s challenging and uncertain time of Removal. Black Warrior area, and cleared it of Red magazine. The magazine A few individuals came to Oklahoma Sticks, both Muscogee and Choctaw. exploded destroying most willingly; many faced the hardships of the Ultimately, the Americans were victorious in of the fort and killing 270 Trail of Tears because they saw no other both the Creek War and in the War of 1812. of the inhabitants (Forbes option for the future of the Choctaw people, However, for some Choctaw families, the war 1821:200-205, Heidler and a few Choctaw individuals profiteered off against the United States did not end with 1996:74). The leader of the of the Removal of their friends and families. these defeats. black militia the Choctaw Most Choctaw individuals did resist Removal Late in the war, Lt. Col. Edward Nicholls of chief somehow survived, on some level, but the level varied from the British Royal Marines and Muscogee but were soon captured. words, to passive resistance, to taking up allies built a fort at Prospect Bluff along the They were both tortured arms and fighting to the death. Over the next waters of the Apalachicola River, in Spanish and executed by the four installments, Iti Fabvssa will explore territory, in what is now the state of Florida. Muscogee warriors four different ways in which Choctaw In 1815, Nicholls transferred the fort and its (Heidler 1996:74) individuals and communities resisted arms to a local resistance group of black This battle is said to be one of the main Removal and the Trail of Tears. militiamen and a few Seminole warriors catalyst events that led up to what would be Armed Resistance (Forbes 1821:200-205). During this time an called the Seminole Wars. The Choctaws that Choctaw people are not widely known to unnamed Choctaw Chief and 25 of his fought in this battle did so as an act of have used force to oppose removal. In warriors came to live at the Fort. It is likely resistance to policy of removal of their people speeches to American representatives in the that they were some of the Choctaw people under the American banner of manifest 1820s Choctaw Chiefs often emphasized that who had fought on the side of the Red Sticks destiny. Later documents indicate that some the Tribe had never taken up arms against during the recent Creek War. of them did survive the battle, but their the United States. While the tribe as a whole In the spring of 1816, Col. Andrew ultimate fate is unknown. never faced the United States on a battlefield Jackson was ordered to destroy the Fort at Works Cited some groups of Choctaw people actually did Prospect Bluff, even though it was on Forbes, James Grant exactly that in hopes of preventing removal. Spanish soil. Jackson corresponded with the 1821 Sketches, Historical and Topo- In the fall of 1811, Shawnee leader Tecum- Spanish Governor in Pensacola asking for graphical, of the Floridas. Electronic seh toured Choctaw villages, encouraging the permission to attack the Fort, but the document Choctaw people to join with the Shawnee and Governor stalled the talks fearing the https://ia600300.us.archive.org/18/ other Native American Tribes in fighting possible counter attacks from the Seminoles. items/sketcheshistoric01forb/sketcheshis- against the newly established United States. Jackson instead devised a plan to have his toric01forb.pdf Choctaw leaders, particularly Pushmataha, Lt. Col. Duncan Lamont Clinch take a supply Halbert , Henry S. debated Tecumseh at each speech, and led convoy by the fort in hopes that it would be 1902 Story of the Treaty of Dancing the Choctaw people away from war. After fired upon, giving a cause for the United Rabbit. Publications of the Mississippi leaving Choctaw country, Tecumseh traveled States to destroy it. That plan was successful. Historical Society vol. 6 pp. 373-402 to Muscogee towns, where his message As American forces moved into the area, they n.d Unpublished Manuscript on file at the received a more welcome reception. came upon a pro-American Muscogee force Alabama State Archives In the summer of 1813, principle Choctaw of 150 warriors, lead by Chief McIntosh, Heidler, David Stephen & Jeanne T. leaders met in council for several days with Captain Isaacs, and Koteha-haigo. Chief Heidler. Muscogee leaders, who represented the Red McIntosh had been tasked by Jackson, prior 1996 Old Hickory’s War: Andrew Jackson Sticks, on the issue of whether or not to go to to these events, to raid the fort. In exchange and the Quest for Empire. Electronic war with the United States. The council McIntosh would be rewarded $50 per slave document. ended with the Muscogee Red Sticks firmly captured, and would be given the fort’s in favor of war and the Choctaw leaders fully armaments and supplies. The Chiefs met against it (Halbert n.d.). with Clinch that night and agreed to help Later that year when the Creek War began, Clinch in his efforts against the Fort (Heidler Choctaw leaders imposed a death penalty on 1996:74). any Choctaw person who joined the Red In the prelude to battle, the Americans Sticks in their attacks against American sent five men on a reconnaissance to find citizens. Hundreds of Choctaw warriors drinking water. In an ambush the Choctaw joined with the Americans fighting against warriors, 40 black militia, and several the Muscogee Red Sticks in the Creek War Seminole warriors killed four of the men and in battles of the broader War of 1812. (Forbes1821:201, Heidler 1996:71). However, some Choctaw families went Clinch, unaware of these events, ordered against their leaders wishes, and risked their McIntosh, Captain Isaacs, and Koteha-haigo .
Recommended publications
  • PETITION Ror,RECOGNITION of the FLORIDA TRIBE Or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS

    PETITION Ror,RECOGNITION of the FLORIDA TRIBE Or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS

    'l PETITION rOR,RECOGNITION OF THE FLORIDA TRIBE or EASTERN CREEK INDIANS TH;: FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS and the Administra­ tive Council, THE NORTHWEST FLORIDA CREEK INDIAN COUNCIL brings this, thew petition to the DEPARTMENT Or THE INTERIOR OF THE FEDERAL GOVERN- MENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and prays this honorable nation will honor their petition, which is a petition for recognition by this great nation that THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS is an Indian Tribe. In support of this plea for recognition THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS herewith avers: (1) THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS nor any of its members, is the subject of Congressional legislation which has expressly terminated or forbidden the Federal relationship sought. (2) The membership of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS is composed principally of persons who are not members of any other North American Indian tribe. (3) A list of all known current members of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEK INDIANS, based on the tribes acceptance of these members and the tribes own defined membership criteria is attached to this petition and made a part of it. SEE APPENDIX----- A The membership consists of individuals who are descendants of the CREEK NATION which existed in aboriginal times, using and occuping this present georgraphical location alone, and in conjunction with other people since that time. - l - MNF-PFD-V001-D0002 Page 1of4 (4) Attached herewith and made a part of this petition is the present governing Constitution of THE FLORIDA TRIBE OF EASTERN CREEKS INDIANS.
  • Choctaw and Creek Removals

    Choctaw and Creek Removals

    Chapter 6 Choctaw and Creek Removals The idea of indian removal as a government obligation first reared its head in 1802 when officials of the state of Georgia made an agreement with federal government officials. In the Georgia Compact, the state of Georgia gave up its claims to territorial lands west of that state in exchange for $1,250,000 and a promise that the federal government would abolish Indian title to Georgia lands as soon as possible. How seriously the government took its obligation to Georgia at the time of the agreement is unknown. The following year, however, the Louisiana Purchase was made, and almost immedi- ately, the trans-Mississippi area was seen by some as the answer to “The Indian Problem.” Not everyone agreed. Some congress- men argued that removal to the West was impractical because of land-hungry whites who could not be restrained from crossing the mighty river to obtain land. Although their conclusion was correct, it was probably made more in opposition to President Jefferson than from any real con- cern about the Indians or about practicality. Although some offers were made by government officials to officials of various tribes, little Pushmataha, Choctaw was done about removing the southeastern tribes before the War of 1812. warrior During that war several Indian tribes supported the British. After the war ended, many whites demanded that tribal lands be confiscated by Removals 67 the government as punishment for Indians’ treasonous activities. Many Americans included all tribes in their confiscationdemands , evidently feeling that all Indians were guilty, despite the fact that many tribes did not participate in the war.
  • Challenge Bowl 2020

    Challenge Bowl 2020

    Sponsored by the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Challenge Bowl 2020 High School Study Guide Sponsored by the Challenge Bowl 2020 Muscogee (Creek) Nation Table of Contents A Struggle To Survive ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 1. Muscogee History ......................................................................................................... 5-30 2. Muscogee Forced Removal ........................................................................................... 31-50 3. Muscogee Customs & Traditions .................................................................................. 51-62 4. Branches of Government .............................................................................................. 63-76 5. Muscogee Royalty ........................................................................................................ 77-79 6. Muscogee (Creek) Nation Seal ...................................................................................... 80-81 7. Belvin Hill Scholarship .................................................................................................. 82-83 8. Wilbur Chebon Gouge Honors Team ............................................................................. 84-85 9. Chronicles of Oklahoma ............................................................................................... 86-97 10. Legends & Stories ......................................................................................................
  • THE WAR of 1812 in CLAY COUNTY, ALABAMA by Don C. East

    THE WAR of 1812 in CLAY COUNTY, ALABAMA by Don C. East

    THE WAR OF 1812 IN CLAY COUNTY, ALABAMA By Don C. East BACKGROUND The War of 1812 is often referred to as the “Forgotten War.” This conflict was overshadowed by the grand scale of the American Revolutionary War before it and the American Civil War afterwards. We Americans fought two wars with England: the American Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. Put simply, the first of these was a war for our political freedom, while the second was a war for our economic freedom. However, it was a bit more complex than that. In 1812, the British were still smarting from the defeat of their forces and the loss of their colonies to the upstart Americans. Beyond that, the major causes of the war of 1812 were the illegal impressments of our ships’ crewmen on the high seas by the British Navy, Great Britain’s interference with our trade and other trade issues, and the British incitement of the Native Americans to hostilities against the Americans along the western and southeast American frontiers. Another, often overlooked cause of this war was it provided America a timely excuse to eliminate American Indian tribes on their frontiers so that further westward expansion could occur. This was especially true in the case of the Creek Nation in Alabama so that expansion of the American colonies/states could move westward into the Mississippi Territories in the wake of the elimination of the French influence there with the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, and the Spanish influence, with the Pinckney Treaty of 1796. Now the British and the Creek Nation were the only ones standing in the way of America’s destiny of moving the country westward into the Mississippi Territories.
  • The Creek War of 1813-1814

    The Creek War of 1813-1814

    The Creek War of 1813-1814 Moderator’s Guide “In classrooms where teachers use deliberation, students learn to think critically, work through differences, and interact with people who may or may not share their point of view. Teaching through deliberation provides students with the skills and abilities to work with others as citizens to claim a better future for their communities.” - Stacie Molnar-Main, Deliberation in the Classroom This issue guide is designed for classroom deliberation on a period of Alabama history that deserves more of our attention: the Creek Indian Civil War of 1813-14. Deliberation is a form of discussion where participants weigh the pros and cons of different approaches to solving a complex problem. Participants work through various tradeoffs or consequences of actions with respect and passion, and, over time, they develop skills required for living in a democratic society: critical thinking, communication, judgment, and empathy. This classroom deliberation invites students to consider the difficult choices that faced Creek Indians in 1813. About the Project This issue guide was developed in collaboration with the Charles F. Kettering Foundation as part of a research project on integrating historical and civic education. Partners include the Caroline Marshall Draughon Center for the Arts & Humanities in the College of Liberal Arts at Auburn University; Clarke County Historical Museum; and the David Mathews Center for Civic Life. Special thanks to colleagues at the Alabama Department of Archives and History and the Alabama Bicentennial Commission, as well as Dr. Kathryn Holland Braund, History Department, Auburn University. This issue guide is dedicated to Robert Thrower (1961-2017), Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, Poarch Creek Indians.
  • The Battle of Horseshoe Bend: Collision of Cultures

    The Battle of Horseshoe Bend: Collision of Cultures

    National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places U.S. Department of the Interior The Battle of Horseshoe Bend: Collision of Cultures The Battle of Horseshoe Bend: Collision of Cultures (Horseshoe Bend National Military Park) Today the Tallapoosa River quietly winds its way through east-central Alabama, its banks edged by the remnants of the forest that once covered the Southeast. About halfway down its 270-mile run to the southwest, the river curls back on itself to form a peninsula. The land defined by this "horseshoe bend" covers about 100 wooded acres; a finger of high ground points down its center, and an island stands sentinel on its west side. This tranquil setting belies the violence that cut through Horseshoe Bend on March 27, 1814. On the peninsula stood 1,000 American Indian warriors, members of the tribe European Americans knew as the Creek. These men, along with 350 women and children, had arrived over the previous six months in search of refuge. Many had been part of a series of costly battles during the past year, all fought in an attempt to regain the autonomy the Indians had held before the arrival of European Americans. Surrounding the Creek were forces led by future President Andrew Jackson, then a major general of the Tennessee Militia. The core of his force was 2,600 European American soldiers, most of whom hoped that a victory would open native land to European American settlement. Yet this fight was not simply European American versus American Indian: on Jackson's side were 600 "friendly" Indians, including 100 Creek.
  • Creek Indian War of 1813-1814

    Creek Indian War of 1813-1814

    National Park Service Ocmulgee Mounds U.S. Department of Interior Ocmulgee Mounds NHP The Creek Indian War of 1813-1814 RIFT OF In the fall of 1811, the great Shawnee chief Tecumseh came to incite the Creeks of THE CREEK Georgia against the whites. He gave a speech at the town of Tuckabatchee challenging CONFEDERACY the Creeks to regain their former glory. In Florida, the Spanish encouraged the discord between Indians and settlers, hoping to gain politically and economically. A rift opened in the Creek Confederacy between those who wanted to remain loyal to the settlers and those who wanted to expel the whites. The latter group, called the Red Sticks because of the red-painted clubs they carried, needed more arms to accomplish their goals and in 1813 a contingent journeyed to Pensacola, Florida to purchase guns and gunpowder from the Spanish. On their return journey, they were attacked by militia and settlers who wanted to prevent the Red Sticks from acquiring ammunion. This skirmish, called the Burnt Corn incident because of the nearby Burnt Corn Creek, escalated the conflict to a point of no return for the Red Sticks. CREEK Two weeks after the Burnt Corn incident, Fort Sinquefield protected a group of RETALIATION the Red Sticks gathered on the banks of settlers, including refugees from the recent the Alabama River to discuss plans for trouble, friendly Creeks and 15 armed retaliation. It was decided to divide the men. Unaware of the approaching danger, Creeks into two sections and attack Fort the inhabitants, along with a contingent Mims and Fort Sinquefield.
  • Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal

    Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal

    Mr. O’Brien U.S. History I PreAP Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal For this assignment you will use excerpts from A Peoples History of the United States by Howard Zinn. I have adapted the appropriate writings from Chapters 7 of Zinn’s book (As Long as Grass Grows or Water Runs. Please refer to the reading to answer the questions. You will be completing this assignment outside of class. The assignment is worth 135 points. Please double-space your typed responses. The due date is ______. Please feel free to email me with any questions at [email protected], or use edmodo.com. * Please type the questions, and follow your answer with a ____/5, ____/10, ____/15, etc. 1. How was the Battle of Horseshoe Bend (of the War of 1812) won? How did Jackson treat the Creeks shortly after the War of 1812? (5 pts) 2. Why would demanding that Indians own private property make them more vulnerable to losing their land than if they continued to use the land in common? (10 pts) 3. From 1814 to 1824, whites took over (via treaties) large parts of the southern states from the Indians. How did Jackson encourage this process? Why would the Indians sign these treaties? (5 pts) 4. For what reasons did Jackson give to explain his invasion of Spanish-owned Florida? (5 pts) 5. Why did the Indians resist leaving their land? (5 pts) 6. How did the federal system (of national and state governments) serve to allow the national government to avoid blame? (10 pts) 7.
  • Information to Users

    Information to Users

    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter free, vdiile others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, b%inning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Hgher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A BeQ & Howell Infimnation Compai^ 300 NoithZeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE FROM ONE TO MANY, FROM MANY TO ONE: SPEECH COMMUNITIES IN THE MUSKOGEE STOMPDANCE POPULATION A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By PAMELA JOAN INNES Norman, Oklahoma 1997 mil Number: 9724423 Copyright 1997 by Izmes, Pamela Joan All rights reserved.
  • The Removal of the Creek Indians from the Southeast, 1825-1838

    The Removal of the Creek Indians from the Southeast, 1825-1838

    THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Except where reference is made to the work of others, the work described in this dissertation is my own or was done in collaboration with my advisory committee. This dissertation does not include proprietary or classified information. ____________________________ Christopher D. Haveman Certificate of Approval: ____________________________ ____________________________ Kenneth W. Noe Kathryn E. Holland Braund, Chair Professor Professor History History ____________________________ ____________________________ David C. Carter John Saye Professor Professor History Education ____________________________ George T. Flowers Dean Graduate School THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Christopher D. Haveman A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama August 10, 2009 THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Christopher D. Haveman Permission is granted to Auburn University to make copies of this dissertation at its discretion, upon request of individuals or institutions and at their expense. The author reserves all publication rights. ________________________________ Signature of Author ________________________________ Date of Graduation iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Christopher D. Haveman Doctor of Philosophy, August 10, 2009 (M.A. Auburn University, 2006) (M.A. Marquette University, 2001) (B.A. Western Washington University, 1998) 407 Typed Pages Directed by Kathryn E. Holland Braund This dissertation examines the removal of approximately twenty-three thousand Creek Indians from Alabama and Georgia to present-day Oklahoma between 1825 and 1838. At its height, the Creek Nation encompassed most of the present-day states of Alabama, Georgia, and Florida.
  • Indian Removal Act

    Indian Removal Act

    SectionSection66 SSectionection PPreviewreview As you read, look for: Native Americans • Sequoyah and his syllabary, • the relationship among the in Georgia settlers, the Cherokee, and the Creek, Native Americans had hunted in Georgia’s forests and fished its streams and • the events leading up to the rivers for ten thousand years. The fifty-five years from 1783 to 1838 were removal of the Cherokee and one of the darkest periods in the history of these Native Americans. During the Creek from Georgia, and this period, they were forced out of their traditional lands and moved to • vocabulary terms: syllabary, unknown territories. Oconee War, Treaty of New York, Red Sticks, White Sticks, Treaty The Cherokee of Indian Springs, litigation, In 1800, most Native Americans in Georgia still made their living in the emigrate, and Trail of Tears. traditional ways—by hunting or farming. Some, however, were quick to learn from white settlers. The Cherokee, in particular, were considered to be the most advanced of the tribes. A few Cherokee, like Chief James Vann, lived in large houses. Located on the outskirts of Chatsworth, Vann’s classic two- Below and opposite page story brick mansion has been called the “Showcase of the Cherokee Nation.” above: The Chief Vann In addition to the main house, the homestead contained forty-two cabins, House, exterior and interior, six barns, five smokehouses, a gristmill, a blacksmith, a foundry, a trading with a typical 18th century post, and a still. Vann believed that Christianity meant progress for the Cherokee log house on left. 192 Chapter 6: An Age of Expansion Cherokee, and he brought in Moravian missionaries to teach his children and his people.
  • Civilizing” Influence of Slavery

    Civilizing” Influence of Slavery

    The “Civilizing” Influence of Slavery The Introduction of African-American Slavery into the Creek Nation and the Spread of American Slave Society into the Southern Frontier Jacob Goldenberg Advisor: Professor Alan Brinkley Second Reader: Professor Barbara J. Fields April 2013 Columbia University in the City of New York Department of History Abstract Prior to its founding as an English colony, modern-day Georgia was populated largely by members of what the English termed to be the Creek Confederacy, a loosely unified conglomeration of various tribes and language groups. Over the course of a century, from Georgia’s founding in 1733 until the removal of the Creeks to lands west of the Mississippi in the early 1830s, Creek lands were slowly adopted into southern slave society. This thesis will focus on the evolving attitudes of American slave-owners towards the presence of slavery among the Creeks of Georgia, and how slavery’s growth affected Creek society and sovereignty east of the Mississippi. During the colonial period, the Creek country was an uncontrolled cultural breeding ground on which a new and unique society with slaves began to emerge. It was during this period that some Creeks themselves first came to own slaves and European slave-owners first came to live among the Creeks. Despite the incongruence of native Creek social life with this system of slavery based on racial difference, African slavery became a recognizable part of life in the Creek country, for Creeks and the new foreigners among them. The years following the Revolutionary War saw slave-owners shift gears as they looked towards colonizing more Creek lands and expanding their slave society into the interior.