Engines of Truth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Engines of Truth Engines of Truth YY6746.indb6746.indb i 77/2/15/2/15 22:40:27:40:27 PPMM This page intentionally left blank Engines of Truth Producing Veracity in the Victorian Courtroom Wendie Ellen Schneider New Haven & London YY6746.indb6746.indb iiiiii 77/2/15/2/15 22:40:27:40:27 PPMM Published with assistance from the Kingsley Trust Association Publication Fund established by the Scroll and Key Society of Yale College. Published with assistance from the foundation established in memory of Calvin Chapin of the Class of 1788, Yale College. Copyright © 2015 by Yale University. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Yale University Press books may be purchased in quantity for educational, business, or promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] (U.S. offi ce) or [email protected] (U.K. offi ce). Set in Bulmer type by Newgen North America. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Control Number: 2015935095 isbn 978–0-300–12566-5 (cloth : alk. paper) A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This paper meets the requirements of ansi/niso z39.48–1992 (Permanence of Paper). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 YY6746.indb6746.indb iivv 77/2/15/2/15 22:40:28:40:28 PPMM For Graham B. Hovey and Frank M. Turner YY6746.indb6746.indb v 77/2/15/2/15 22:40:28:40:28 PPMM This page intentionally left blank Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 part one from crime to cross-examination 1. The Rise and Fall of Perjury Prosecutions 17 2. The Gentlemanly Art of Cross-examination 48 part two experimentation abroad and at home 3. Perjury and Prevarication in British India 103 4. The Queen’s Proctor: An Inquisitorial Experiment 143 5. Adultery, Sex Offenses, and the Criminal Evidence Act of 1898 181 Notes 211 Index 259 YY6746.indb6746.indb vviiii 77/2/15/2/15 22:40:28:40:28 PPMM This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgments this book initially took shape at Yale University, where I was fortunate to attend classes at the intersection of York and Wall Streets, the literal coming together of a world-class history department and a law school unique for its critical self-awareness and intellectual vibrancy. Without that happy coincidence and the community of scholars and visitors it attracted, this project could not have happened. I am very grateful for both the legal his- tory program at the Yale Law School and the broad-minded approach of the Yale History Department. Law and history may seem to occupy two indepen- dent intellectual universes, but at Yale the physical distance between them was less than a stone’s throw, and the conceptual distance shrank markedly as a result. This book is the product of the climate of broad-based intellectual curiosity and questioning this proximity fostered. At Yale, I benefi ted from the instruction of Mirjan Damaška, George Fisher, Robert W. Gordon, Laura Kalman, John Langbein, Jerry Mashaw, Reva Siegel, and James Whitman at the Law School; and Linda Colley, Geof- frey Parker, Jonathan Spence, Frank M. Turner, and David Underdown in the History Department. Rogers Smith in the Political Science Department encouraged and mentored me as a teacher of legal history to undergraduates. Bob Gordon and Frank Turner also served as the co-advisors of my disserta- tion research. It is an enduring regret for me that I am not able to give Frank a copy of this book. He, and Graham Hovey, who encouraged me at a very early stage to write and to think about history on a global scale, both passed away before this book’s publication. Each of them left a permanent mark on the text that follows, which is therefore dedicated to their memory. One of the wonderful things about studying legal history at Yale was the cohort of students interested in that topic during my time there. We ix YY6746.indb6746.indb iixx 77/2/15/2/15 22:40:28:40:28 PPMM x Acknowledgments truly learned as much from each other as from our readings. There were many fi ne scholars, both in the joint program in law and history and also among my colleagues on the Yale Law Journal and the Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. Late-night conversations with my fellow students, as we struggled to pin down references and citations, shaped the intellectual foundations of this book. Financially, the research for this book was made possible by awards from the Truman Foundation, the Mellon Foundation, the Yale Graduate School, and a travel grant from Iowa State University. The law fi rm of De- bevoise & Plimpton also supported my research indirectly, as did the Yale Law School’s COAP repayment program. At the University of Iowa, I ben- efi ted from the research help of a number of wonderful student assistants and library employees. Research on this topic would not have been possible without the su- perb collections and knowledgeable staff of the India Offi ce Collection at the British Library, the British Library Newspapers at Colindale, and the Public Records Offi ce materials held at the National Archives in Kew. I am also indebted to the marvelous collections of historical legal materials at the Yale Law School library, the University of Iowa Law School library, and the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies in London. I am grateful to the editors and readers at the Yale University Press who have provided helpful suggestions over the course of the development of this manuscript. Chris Rogers, Erica Hanson, and Dan Heaton have been remarkably supportive of my work over this book’s long develop- ment, and Jessie Dolch was a very effective copy editor. Ultimately, however, family and an array of furry creatures have spent the most time with this book project. Mocha the rabbit and dogs Suley, Dervish, and Djinn have contributed nothing to the content of this book but have provided ample distraction and occasional note-stealing services. John Monroe, my husband and partner in crime, has been there through the thick and thin of this project. His assistance has been invaluable, and his ability to remain interested in the follies of an array of nineteenth- century characters has kept this endeavor going. I cannot overstate my debt of grati- tude to him. YY6746.indb6746.indb x 77/2/15/2/15 22:40:28:40:28 PPMM Engines of Truth YY6746.indb6746.indb xxii 77/2/15/2/15 22:40:28:40:28 PPMM This page intentionally left blank Introduction charles allen was unlucky. In 1850, he testifi ed for a friend in a case that grew out of a road accident. A brougham driven by a man named Haynes allegedly ran up against a pony-chaise and caused two pounds, eighteen shillings in damage. The owners of the chaise sued for damages, and Allen testifi ed that in fact no collision had occurred. Rather unconvincingly, he suggested that the damage had been caused by the pony-chaise having been backed into a water tub. The County Court judge hearing the case ignored Allen’s testimony, awarded damages to the plain- tiffs, and committed Allen, still a teenager, on perjury charges. At Allen’s trial, the prosecution argued that Allen had lied in order to prevent Haynes, apparently a friend, from losing his job. The jury convicted Allen, and, de- spite his youth, the judge sentenced him to seven years’ transportation.1 Harriet Ricketts fared little better. In 1885, she petitioned for divorce from her husband, William, citing his cruelty, adultery, and desertion. Al- though she was successful before the Divorce Court, Harriet did not re- ceive a divorce because her case attracted the attention of the Queen’s Proc- tor, a Victorian offi cial charged with discovering falsity in divorce cases. In a separate proceeding, Harriet had to defend herself against William’s accusation that she had committed adultery with Silas Beasly. If petitioners for divorce had themselves committed adultery, their petitions were auto- matically rejected. Harriet responded that since their separation, William had repeatedly sought her out and verbally abused her at her workplace. In order to hide from him, she claimed to be married to Beasly when she gave a statement to the police about an unrelated traffi c accident. Harriet denied any relationship with Beasly and contended that she used his name only because she was afraid her husband would discover her whereabouts. 1 YY6746.indb6746.indb 1 77/2/15/2/15 22:40:28:40:28 PPMM 2 Introduction Her word was not deemed sound enough to outweigh the Queen’s Proc- tor’s charges. The court denied her divorce petition, leaving her married to William.2 Charles’s and Harriet’s ill luck was a matter of bad historical timing. Had they been caught lying in court half a century earlier or later, they likely would have gone unpunished. Late eighteenth- and early nineteenth- century courts did little to prosecute perjury, even though judges regu- larly complained about its prevalence in their courtrooms.3 Similarly, by the end of the nineteenth century, an indifference to perjury had returned, and prosecution of it was effectively restricted to a narrow range of cases. By 1898, the Home Offi ce described perjury by criminal defendants as a “not very serious matter.”4 But courts in the mid-nineteenth century ap- proached the question of truth-telling with unprecedented seriousness and adopted an array of innovative strategies to guarantee veracity in trials.
Recommended publications
  • DATES of TRIALS Until October 1775, and Again from December 1816
    DATES OF TRIALS Until October 1775, and again from December 1816, the printed Proceedings provide both the start and the end dates of each sessions. Until the 1750s, both the Gentleman’s and (especially) the London Magazine scrupulously noted the end dates of sessions, dates of subsequent Recorder’s Reports, and days of execution. From December 1775 to October 1816, I have derived the end dates of each sessions from newspaper accounts of the trials. Trials at the Old Bailey usually began on a Wednesday. And, of course, no trials were held on Sundays. ***** NAMES & ALIASES I have silently corrected obvious misspellings in the Proceedings (as will be apparent to users who hyper-link through to the trial account at the OBPO), particularly where those misspellings are confirmed in supporting documents. I have also regularized spellings where there may be inconsistencies at different appearances points in the OBPO. In instances where I have made a more radical change in the convict’s name, I have provided a documentary reference to justify the more marked discrepancy between the name used here and that which appears in the Proceedings. ***** AGE The printed Proceedings almost invariably provide the age of each Old Bailey convict from December 1790 onwards. From 1791 onwards, the Home Office’s “Criminal Registers” for London and Middlesex (HO 26) do so as well. However, no volumes in this series exist for 1799 and 1800, and those for 1828-33 inclusive (HO 26/35-39) omit the ages of the convicts. I have not comprehensively compared the ages reported in HO 26 with those given in the Proceedings, and it is not impossible that there are discrepancies between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing the Adversary Criminal Trial: Lawyers in the Old Bailey Proceedings, 1770-1800
    This is a repository copy of Representing the Adversary Criminal Trial: Lawyers in the Old Bailey Proceedings, 1770-1800. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/80944/ Version: Submitted Version Book Section: Shoemaker, R.B. (2012) Representing the Adversary Criminal Trial: Lawyers in the Old Bailey Proceedings, 1770-1800. In: Crime, Courtrooms and the Public Sphere in Britain, 1700-1850. Ashgate , 71 - 91. ISBN 978-1-4094-1803-0 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Representing the Adversary Criminal Trial: Lawyers in the Old Bailey Proceedings, 1770-1800* Robert B. Shoemaker … the very extensive publication of all the trials indiscriminately, according to the present practice, is a product of great mischief, operating both as an instruction and an encouragement to thieves.1 i.
    [Show full text]
  • Lives of Eminent Serjeants
    00024288 i ' 1 I the I I A siatic Society of Bombay | Towf-n MaM, Bombay, ® Digitized with financial assistance from the Government of Maharashtra on 19 September, 2016 LIVES OF EMINENT SERJEANTS-AT-LAW / r ' ‘ A t, ■*< (■; 1' ■ ■ > 1 \\ \ ' '-'’1'- l ;r L -*y ’i« v_ *■ ' y LIVES EMINENT 8ERJEANT8-AT-LAW OP THE ENGLISH BAB. BY HUMPHRY WILLIAM WOOLRYCH. Serjeant-at-Lavt. 24288 — IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. II. ■ ■■] LONDON: W m . h . ALLEN & CO., 13, WATERLOO PLACE, PALL MALL. S.W. 1869. t’j'-o // ,v 00024288 00024288 L0KD0N!_L swx8 & s, Alo(orgate Street. LIVES OF EMINENT SERJEANTS. THE DARNALS. W hether Darnal, Darnel, or DameU, or even Darnall, according to various readings, these lawyers were of high promise. The elder was spoken of in 1700, amongst other gossip, by Luttrell, as the new Baron of the Exchequer, and actually, though incorrectly, named by him as such.* A classical pim is extant upon the name. Kett, or Horse Kett, as he was called at Oxford, from the resemblance which his head bore to that animal, was a master of the schools at Oxfoi’d, and with him was Mr. Dai’nell. The following line was immediately applied to these gentlemen:— “ Infclix Lolium, et steriles dominantur avenffi.” “ Oats and Davnol choke the rising corn.”’ Or rather, according to Covington, nascimtur. “ Nas- 1 “ Diary,’* voL iv. pp. 652, 653. Sir Salathiol Lovol, Recorclor of London, got the vacant place, '' Dryden*3 “ Pastorals," vol. v. p. 56.—“ Virg. Eclog.,*’ v. 37- yoL . II. 1 Limes OF EMPBNT SBHJEAKTS. «uiii'tur,” he observes, is fouaad:^ ¿¡H th e M SS.” A nd ’ he dhsthigudshes the ^vord “dornikiantur'' iaa th e “ dreorgÌGS,.” -where exactly the sa®ae passage appears, ■ b y i^eferriag th e ikist to“ Weeds giiow higdmongst th e Gora,” whereas, here the “ weeds are ^?owipgvmtmà of baadey.” * tS© ia Job: Goekle or darabl iastead o i barley.
    [Show full text]
  • Untying the Knot: an Analysis of the English Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Court Records, 1858-1866 Danaya C
    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2004 Untying the Knot: An Analysis of the English Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Court Records, 1858-1866 Danaya C. Wright University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Common Law Commons, Family Law Commons, and the Women Commons Recommended Citation Danaya C. Wright, Untying the Knot: An Analysis of the English Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Court Records, 1858-1866, 38 U. Rich. L. Rev. 903 (2004), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/205 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNTYING THE KNOT: AN ANALYSIS OF THE ENGLISH DIVORCE AND MATRIMONIAL CAUSES COURT RECORDS, 1858-1866 Danaya C. Wright * I. INTRODUCTION Historians of Anglo-American family law consider 1857 as a turning point in the development of modern family law and the first big step in the breakdown of coverture' and the recognition of women's legal rights.2 In 1857, The United Kingdom Parlia- * Associate Professor of Law, University of Florida, Levin College of Law. This arti- cle is a continuation of my research into nineteenth-century English family law reform. My research at the Public Record Office was made possible by generous grants from the University of Florida, Levin College of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • 41234248.Pdf
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sydney eScholarship Trials, Truth-Telling and the Performing Body. Kathryn Lee Leader A thesis submitted to the University of Sydney in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Performance Studies July 2008 Abstract In this thesis, I examine the role performance plays in the adversarial criminal jury trial. The initial motivation behind this inquiry was the pervasiveness of a metaphor: why is the courtroom so frequently compared to a theatre? Most writings on this topic see the courtroom as bearing what might be termed a cosmetic resemblance to a theatre, making comparisons, for instance, between elements of costume and staging. I pursue a different line of argument. I argue that performance is not simply an embellishment of the trial process but rather a constitutive feature of the criminal jury trial. It is by means of what I call the performance of tradition that the trial acquires its social significance as a (supposedly) timeless bulwark of authority and impartiality. In the first three chapters I show that popular usage of the term ‗theatrical‘ (whether it be to describe the practice of a flamboyant lawyer, or a misbehaving defendant) is frequently laden with pejorative connotations and invariably (though usually only implicitly) invokes comparison to a presupposed authentic or natural way of behaviour (‗not-performing‘). Drawing on the work of Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu I argue that, whatever legal agents see as appropriate trial conduct (behaviour that is ‗not-performing‘), they are misrecognising the performative accomplishments and demands required of both legal agents and laypersons in the trial.
    [Show full text]
  • Stern Book4print Rev.Pdf
    HOME ECONOMICS Stern_final_rev.indb 1 3/28/2008 3:50:37 PM Stern_final_rev.indb 2 3/28/2008 3:50:37 PM HOME ECONOMICS Domestic Fraud in Victorian England R EBECCA S TE R N The Ohio State University Press / C o l u m b u s Stern_final_rev.indb 3 3/28/2008 3:50:40 PM Copyright ©2008 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Stern, Rebecca. Home economics : domestic fraud in Victorian England / Rebecca Stern. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8142-1090-1 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Fraud in literature. 2. English literature—19th century—History and criticism. 3. Popular literature—Great Britain—History and criticism. 4. Home economics in literature 5. Swindlers and swindling in literature. 6. Capitalism in literature. 7. Fraud in popular cul- ture. 8. Fraud—Great Britain—History—19th century. I. Title. PR468.F72S74 2008 820.9'355—dc22 2007035891 This book is available in the following editions: Cloth (ISBN 978-0-8142-1090-1) CD (ISBN 978-0-8142-9170-2) Cover by Janna Thompson Chordas Text design and typesetting by Jennifer Shoffey Forsythe Type set in Adobe Garamond Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Stern_final_rev.indb 4 3/28/2008 3:50:40 PM For my parents, Annette and Mel, who make all the world a home Stern_final_rev.indb 5 3/28/2008 3:50:40
    [Show full text]
  • 812 SERJEANT BALLANTINE an Advocate May Have Little Black Letter
    812 SERJEANT BALLANTINE An advocate may have little black letter learning, and yet he may scale the heights of his profession, if he can lay bare the human heart and read its secrets. Serjeant Ballantine-the genial cynic of the law-is a case in point. Ballantine made no bones of his lack o£ legal scholarship. He boasted that he knew a little of everything but law. Nor was his boast an idle one. He was innocent of many of the elementary principles of law, yet few advocates were better verdict-getters than he. His success lay in his ability to read a witness's mind, and determine the motives of his conduct, almost at a glance. His knowledge of human nature, of men and women, their mode of life and their way of thought, was phenomenal. If an advocate goes off on the wrong tack, the truth will out. No other professional man runs the same risk of having his ignorance exposed, his errors brought to light. The doctor can cover up his mistakes, the clergyman holds an ex parte brief, the teacher is an autocrat whose word there is none to dispute; but the barrister works in the open, subject to opposition at every turn. He does not have the floor to himself, but shares it with a brother barrister who gives the other side of the picture. If he does not know his case, that fact soon becomes obvious. If he is incompetent, the truth soon proclaims itself. Serjeant Ballantine often found himself in a tight corner in court, but no one was better than he at covering up his own deficiencies .
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUDICIARY OP TAP Oupcrior COURTS 1820 to 1968 : A
    THE JUDICIARY OP TAP oUPCRIOR COURTS 1820 to 1968 : A SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY A tiiesis presented for the lAPhilo degree University of London. JENNIFER MORGAl^o BEDFORD COLLEGE, 1974. ProQuest Number: 10097327 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10097327 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Aijstract This study is an attempt to construct o social profile of the Juoiciary of the superior courts uurin^ the period 1 8 20-1 9 6 8. The analyses cover a vio: raepe of characteristics iacluuiap parental occupation, schooling, class op degree, ape of call to toæ luu' ^aa ape at appolnt^/^ent to tue -each. These indices are used to deter..line how far opportunities for recruitment to the dench lave seen circumscribed by social origin, to assess the importance of academic pualificaticns and vocational skills in the achievement of professional success and to describe the pattern of the typical judicial career. The division of the total population of judges into four cohorts, based on the date of their initial appointment to the superior courts, allows throughout for historical comparison, demonstrating the major ^oints of change and alsu underlining the continuities in tne composition of the Bench during the period studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgers and Fiction: How Forgery Developed the Novel, 1846-79
    Forgers and Fiction: How Forgery Developed the Novel, 1846-79 Paul Ellis University College London Doctor of Philosophy UMI Number: U602586 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U602586 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 Abstract This thesis argues that real-life forgery cases significantly shaped the form of Victorian fiction. Forgeries of bills of exchange, wills, parish registers or other documents were depicted in at least one hundred novels between 1846 and 1879. Many of these portrayals were inspired by celebrated real-life forgery cases. Forgeries are fictions, and Victorian fiction’s representations of forgery were often self- reflexive. Chapter one establishes the historical, legal and literary contexts for forgery in the Victorian period. Chapter two demonstrates how real-life forgers prompted Victorian fiction to explore its ambivalences about various conceptions of realist representation. Chapter three shows how real-life forgers enabled Victorian fiction to develop the genre of sensationalism. Chapter four investigates how real-life forgers influenced fiction’s questioning of its epistemological status in Victorian culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Experiences of a Barrister's Life
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com I " • GIFT OF John Garber Palacbe Helen Palacbe Lansdale from the estate of the late judge John Garber Slips for Librarians to paste on Catalogue Cards. N. B.— Take out carefully, leaving about quarter of an inch at the back. To do otherwise would, in some cases, release other leaves. BALLANTINE, WILLIAM. SOME EXPERI ENCES OF A BARRISTER'S LIFE. By Mr. SERJEANT BALLANTINE. New York: Henry Holt & Co., 1882. i2mo, pp. xxiv., 527. SOME EXPERIENCES OF A BARRIS TER'S LIFE. By Mr. SERJEANT BALLANTINE. New York : Henry Holt & Co., 1882. izrno, pp. xxiv., 527. BIOGRAPHY. SOME EXPERIENCES OF A BAR RISTER'S LIFE. By MR. SERJEANT BALLANTINE. New York : Henry Holt & Co., 1882. 12100, pp. xxiv., 527. MEMOIRS. SOME EXPERIENCES OF A BARRIS TER'S LIFE. By MR. SERJEANT BALLANTINE. New York : Henry Holt & Co., 1882. i2mo, pp. xxiv., 527. SOME EXPERIENCES OP A BARRISTER'S LIFE MR SERJEANT BALLANTINE NEW YORK HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY 1882 PREFATORY NOTE. T HAVE felt at a loss to know in what manner I ought to introduce the following pages to the reader, and should have been inclined to launch them without a word of preface, but that it might be thought that I formed an exaggerated estimate of their intrinsic worth, which certainly is not the case. What I have striven to do, and trust I have suc ceeded in doing, has been to adhere strictly to facts in the incidents related ; and the conclusions ex pressed are the honest results of such experience as a long professional life, not unmixed with other asso ciations, has enabled me to form.
    [Show full text]
  • A True L I S 1 the LORDS Spiritual and Temporal
    A True L I S 1 the LORDS Spiritual and Temporal: As alfo a LIST of the Knights and Commiffioners of Shires, Citizens and Burgeffes, choien to ferve in the Parliament of Great'Britain, fummoned to meet at Wejlminfler the Twenty fifth of November, 1710. according to the Returns made into the Office of the Clerk of the Crown in Her Majefty’s High Court of Chancery. ■ ^ Note: Thofe which have this Mark, * before them, were not Members of the laft Parliament. Arthur Herbert, Earl of Tor- Borough of Portpigham, alias Borough Harwich. /Ecdttjampronfiifrk, 9 Borougn tt/Andover. Borough of Chippenham. ^Unr, 2. ARCHBISHOPS Sir James Long Bar. rington. Weftlow. Kendrick Edisbury Efq-, Sir Juftinian Ifham Bar. The Rt. Hm. John Smith Ejq-, Sir Roger Moftyn Bar. and BISHOPS. ♦Jofeph Afh Efq-, f A Lift of the PEER S Richard Lomley, Earl of Scar Rt. Hon. Sir Charles Hedges Kt. Thomas Frankland Efq-, Thomas Cartwright Efq-, Wiii'iam Guidott Ffq-, Town of Flint. Borough of Malmesbury. borough. Dr. Thomas Tennifon, Lord Arthur Maynwaring E/y; City of Peterborough. <g)taffo?t)Q?lre, 10. S/r John Conway Bar. Note;*- Thofe marked George Booth, Earl of War- Archbifhop of Canterbury. Borough of Grampound. ®louceflerflfirc, 8. *Hon. John Fitz-Williams Efq Thomas Farrington EJq-, John Berkley Efqi The Hon. Henry Pagett Efq-, Jofeph Addifon Efqj thm *are under Age. rington. Dr. John Sharp, Lord Archbi- Rt. Hon. Thomas Coke Efq\ ♦ ♦Charles Parker Efq-, ©lamojaan, 2. Matthew Ducie Moreton Efqi ♦William Ward Jun. Ejq-, Borough of Crick lade. Richard Newport, E. of Brad- fhop of York.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Cactus: the Life of Anna Kingsford
    RED CACTUS: THE LIFE OF ANNA KINGSFORD Alan Pert Books & Writers Copyright © Alan Pert. All rights reserved. This book is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, (for example a fair dealing for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review) no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission. National Library of Australia CIP: Pert, Alan. Red cactus : the life of Anna Kingsford. Bibliography. Includes index. ISBN 9781740184052. 1. Kingsford, Anna Bonus, 1846-1888. 2. Theosophists - Great Britain - Biography. 3. Women physicians - Great Britain - Biography. I. Title. 299.934092 First published in Australia in 2006 Reprinted 2007 Books & Writers Network Pty Ltd P.O. Box W76, Watsons Bay NSW 2030 www.wildandwoolley.com.au Book design: Pat Woolley Set in Fournier In loving memory of my parents Ruby Adele Pert (1917-2004) Ronald Ernest Pert (1916-1994) Contents Chronology of the Life of Anna Kingsford - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -vii Introduction - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1 1 Early Years - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -5 2 A Young Woman - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -17 3 Marriage - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -23 4 Anna’s Own Paper - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -35 5 Anna at Home - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [Show full text]