The United States and Japan in Global Context: 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The United States and Japan in Global Context: 2012 The Edwin O. Reischauer Center For East Asian Studies The United States and Japan in Global Context: 2012 THE PAUL H. NITZE SCHOOL OF ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL SUTIDES THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY WASHINGTON, D.C. THE EDWIN O. REISCHAUER CENTER FOR EAST ASIAN STUDIES THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN IN GLOBAL CONTEXT: 2012 THE PAUL H. NITZE SCHOOL OF ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL STUDIES THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY Washington, D.C. Edwin O. Reischauer (Oct. 15, 1910 – Sept. 1, 1990) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ····················································································································· 1 William L. Brooks Structural Issues Impeded Progress in Japan-South Korea Relations ···························· 27 Patrick Branco Same Game or End Game? Japan and the North Korea Conundrum ····························· 39 Matthew Yi The Political Influence of the Matsushita Institute of Government and Management ··· 49 Narae Choi Japan’s Energy Security in a Post-3/11 Future ······························································· 63 Dan Zhu Japan’s Monetary Policy Choices in a World of Financial Crisis ·································· 78 Conor Foley A Golden Opportunity: Japan and the Trans-Pacific Partnership ··································· 94 Max Helzberg Damage Control: Nuclear Fear and Japanese Exports after 3/11 ·································· 105 Benjamin Lauer Startup Japan: Ensuring Future Economic Growth ······················································· 120 Timothy Koide Class Research Trip to Tokyo, November 2011: Photo Album ···································· 132 A Year of Solidarity in U.S.-Japan Relations: Supporting Japan’s Recovery at the Reischauer Center ·········································································································· 134 Kent E. Calder Reischauer Center Events, 2011-2012 ··········································································· 138 Contributors ··················································································································· 141 INTRODUCTION The U.S.-Japan relationship in 2011 was profoundly affectedly by the aftermath of an enormous tragedy that hit Japan on March 11 – the Great Northeast Japan Earthquake. This year‘s issue of U.S.-Japan in Global Context brings into sharp focus the impact of the great earthquake, tsunami and nuclear crisis in northeast Japan on ties with the U.S. and Asian neighbors, energy security, managing the economy, and political leadership. The introduction below has been lengthened to delve deeply into the events and policy challenges of that fateful year, while placing into that context the themes contained in the collection of papers that follow. The papers, written by the students of Johns Hopkins University‘s School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), in dealing with broad policy themes, also address Japan‘s efforts to cope with a range of specific issues while under great stress from the triple disaster. The Triple Disaster on March 11, 2011 At 2:46 on the afternoon of March 11, 2011, a 9.0 magnitude earthquake struck Japan offshore, triggering a tsunami wave of up to 10 meters (33 ft) that engulfed large parts of northeast Japan and also damaged the Fukushima nuclear plant, was a disaster of epoch proportions for even a country prone to severe earthquakes, tsunami and volcanic eruptions. The number of dead and missing is now estimated to be 22,900. So massive in size was the earthquake that, according to NASA, the force shortened the length of the Earth's day by a fraction and shifted how the planet's mass is distributed. At peak, over 400,000 people in northeast Japan were displaced by the triple disaster. Those fortunate enough to have homes left to return to did so, reducing the evacuees to 216,963 in three weeks. Their lives in ruins, no home, occupation, or even community to return to, people were forced to live in evacuation centers for months with only the basics of human needs being provided. In April, the government began to build temporary housing for the homeless, and by the end of August almost all of the centers were closed down. No one knows how long people living in such housing will have to stay there, for it will take years to rebuild from scratch the communities washed into the sea. In areas affected by the nuclear accident, there is no timetable for the 80,000 living in temporary housing to return. The immediate enormous challenge is the removal and disposal of over 23 million tons of debris in the three prefectures – Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima – hit by the earthquake and tsunami. Although work to clear the debris is well underway, it is not clear where the remaining mountains of rubble everywhere – a total 1.6 times that of the 1995 Osaka-Kobe earthquake -- can be removed in the estimated three years time being allotted. The government is negotiating with prefectures across Japan to accept the hauled away debris. And rebuilding the vast stretch of devastated communities along the northeast coast will take up to 10 years to complete, according to some estimates. The earthquake was followed by a series of tsunami waves – the worst in the history of Japan – that severely damaged the Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO)-operated Fukushima No. 1 1 nuclear complex, located along the coast of the towns of Futaba and Okuma in Fukushima Prefecture. As a result of the disaster, all external power sources were lost, causing the supply of cooling water to the plant's No. 1, 2 and 3 reactors to stop. Hydrogen was generated as a result of a chemical reaction between fuel rods and water, leading to explosions that severely damaged reactor buildings. The government, which initially estimated the accident level at 4 on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES), later raised the level to 7 -- the highest rank. This matched the level of the Chernobyl catastrophe, which at that stage was the worst nuclear accident in history. Compounding of missteps exacerbated nuclear crisis TEPCO‘s failure in its initial response to the crisis at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant in Fukushima Prefecture created a chain reaction of trouble, according to analysis of events during the first three weeks after the March 11 earthquake and tsunami. At the crippled nuclear power plant, three reactors have been cooled by injecting water using temporarily set up pumps. However, there were fears the spent nuclear fuel rods stored in the reactors' temporary storage pools would overheat again. It was only in May that TEPCO admitted that a meltdown had actually occurred. That was when everyone understood the enormous extent of the accident. TEPCO's way of publicly releasing information related to the accident also drew much criticism from the start. The nuclear plant lost all power on the afternoon of March 11 due to the gigantic tsunami that followed the great earthquake, causing an emergency halt to the operations of the Nos. 1 to 3 reactors. The Nos. 4 to 6 reactors already were not operating due to periodic inspections. Temperatures and pressures inside the pressure vessels of the Nos. 1 to 3 reactors began rising sharply, complicating the injection of cooling water into the reactors. When the level of water in the reactors drops, nuclear fuel rods become exposed, overheat and may start melting, risking damage to the reactor as well as the emission of radioactive substances. On the night of March 11, TEPCO planned a controlled release of vapor mixed with radioactive substances from the No. 1 reactor, in an operation to decrease pressure in the pressure vessel. However, the operation was not carried out until 10:17 a.m. the following day, four hours after Prime Minister Naoto Kan left the Prime Minister's Office to travel to the Fukushima Prefecture plant for an inspection. Also, evacuation of residents in areas within 10 kilometers of the power plant had not been completed at that time. Then, on the afternoon of March 12, a hydrogen explosion occurred at the No. 1 reactor, destroying the reactor building roof. Kenzo Miya, professor emeritus at the University of Tokyo, an expert on nuclear engineering, said the prime minister's inspection delayed TEPCO's original plans to vent the pressure vessel. "Because of the prime minister's [impending] inspection, the start of the 'vent' was delayed. The possibility that the subsequent actions all fell behind can't be denied," Miya said. Haruki Madarame, chairman of the Cabinet Office's Nuclear Safety Commission, also noted the time- loss disadvantage. "Work [to conduct the 'vent'] took time to get under way. As a result, several hours were lost before starting to inject seawater [to cool the reactor]. It was a painful incident," Madarame said, when recalling the situation on the night of March 23. 2 Meanwhile, TEPCO President Masataka Shimizu and Chairman Tsunehisa Katsumata were on separate business trips on March 11 when the tsunami hit the plant. They could not return to Tokyo until the following day. "As we communicated with cell phones and other measures, there were no chain of command problems," an official of TEPCO's public relations department said. However, the absence of top management officials might have resulted in the delay in the initial response, some people involved in the handling of the accident said. Use of seawater To cool the reactor core, TEPCO started injecting seawater in the No. 1 reactor shortly after 8 p.m. on March 12--a full 19 hours since the containment vessel's pressure began rising
Recommended publications
  • Race Begins for Japan's Top Spot
    As of 12 p.m. ET DJIA 10132.62 À 1.08% FTSE 100 5151.32 g 0.23% Nikkei 225 9603.24 g 1.12% Shanghai Comp. 2571.42 À 0.12% Hang Seng 19471.80 g 0.13% Sensex 16741.84 À 1.02% S&P/ASX 200 4381.03 g 0.73% Hon Hai to increase wages Japan looks for a new for its workers in China by 30% leader and new ideas BUSINESS & FINANCE 17 EDITORIAL & OPINION 11, 13 KKDN PPS 648/11/2010 (028507)Malaysia: RM6.00, Pakistan: Rs140.00, Philippines: KKDN Peso80.00,Australia: PP A$6.00(Incl Singapore: 9315/10/2010 S$4.00(Incl GST), (025811) Brunei: GST), Sri B$5.00, Lanka: China: Slrs180(Incl RMB25.00, VAT), Hong Taiwan: Kong: NT$60.00, MICA HK$18.00, Thailand: (P) India: Baht50.00, NO. Rs25.00, 048/10/2009 Vietnam: Indonesia: US$2.50 Rp18,000(Incl PPN), Japan: Yen500 SK. MENPEN R.I. NO: 01/SK/MENPEN/SCJJ/1998 TGL. 4 SEPT 1998 VOL. XXXIV NO. 192 (India facsimile Vol. 1 No. 253) ** ASIA Thursday, June 3, 2010 asia.WSJ.com Race begins for Japan’s top spot Kan plans to run; In the wings | Potential Hatoyama successors U.S. plan to shift a big job will be Okinawa base to ease voter ire Naoto Kan, 63 stays contentious BY YUKA HAYASHI Finance Minister BY YUKA HAYASHI TOKYO—After Prime Min- Kan won fame in the 1990s TOKYO—The contentious ister Yukio Hatoyama’s sud- as health minister for issue of relocating U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress
    Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress Emma Chanlett-Avery, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs William H. Cooper Specialist in International Trade and Finance Mark E. Manyin Specialist in Asian Affairs January 13, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33436 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress Summary The post-World War II U.S.-Japan alliance has long been an anchor of the U.S. security role in East Asia. The alliance facilitates the forward deployment of about 36,000 U.S. troops and other U.S. military assets in the Asia-Pacific, thereby undergirding U.S. national security strategy in the region. For Japan, the alliance and the U.S. nuclear umbrella provide maneuvering room in dealing with its neighbors, particularly China and North Korea. U.S.-Japan relations have been adjusting to the Democratic Party of Japan’s (DPJ) landslide victory in the August 30, 2009, elections for the Lower House of Japan’s legislature. The DPJ’s victory appears to mark the end of an era in Japan; it was the first time Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) was voted out of office. The LDP had ruled Japan virtually uninterrupted since 1955. Since the resignation of the DPJ’s first prime minister, Yukio Hatoyama, in June 2010, bilateral relations have been smoother under the leadership of Naoto Kan. Although in the past some members of the DPJ have questioned and/or voted against several features of the alliance, the party appears to have shifted its strategic thinking after a series of provocations from North Korea and indications of growing assertiveness from the Chinese military in disputed waters in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Crisis Management
    e Fukushima Nuclearand Crisis Accident Management e Fukushima The Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Crisis Management — Lessons for Japan-U.S. Alliance Cooperation — — Lessons for Japan-U.S. Alliance Cooperation — — Lessons for Japan-U.S. September, 2012 e Sasakawa Peace Foundation Foreword This report is the culmination of a research project titled ”Assessment: Japan-US Response to the Fukushima Crisis,” which the Sasakawa Peace Foundation launched in July 2011. The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant that resulted from the Great East Japan Earthquake of March 11, 2011, involved the dispersion and spread of radioactive materials, and thus from both the political and economic perspectives, the accident became not only an issue for Japan itself but also an issue requiring international crisis management. Because nuclear plants can become the target of nuclear terrorism, problems related to such facilities are directly connected to security issues. However, the policymaking of the Japanese government and Japan-US coordination in response to the Fukushima crisis was not implemented smoothly. This research project was premised upon the belief that it is extremely important for the future of the Japan-US relationship to draw lessons from the recent crisis and use that to deepen bilateral cooperation. The objective of this project was thus to review and analyze the lessons that can be drawn from US and Japanese responses to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, and on the basis of these assessments, to contribute to enhancing the Japan-US alliance’s nuclear crisis management capabilities, including its ability to respond to nuclear terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • December 20, 20183:30Pm
    Free admission Max: 80 people (First come first serve) Progressive technology and affordability. Miyagi Prefecture offers the needs of companies at low costs. Learn why Miyagi is on the rise in the international investment scene. December 20, 2018 3:30pm - 6:30pm Venue:JETRO IBSC Hall, Ark Mori Bldg., 7F Presentation1 15:30~16:00 Opening Remarks Miyagi Governor Yoshihiro Murai Governor Yoshihiro Murai was born in Toyonaka, Osaka. He attended the National Defense Academy, served as a helicopter pilot for the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force, attended the Matsushita Institute of Government and Management, and served as a Miyagi Prefecture Assemblymember before becoming Miyagi Governor in 2005. It is now his fourth term in office. Governor Murai aims to bring about an innovative recovery from the Great East Earthquake Disaster, and seeks to do so by establishing a strong economic foundation for promoting further economic growth. The cycle of wealth will then help push the development of welfare, education, environment, and social overhead capital. Not just attracting companies such as Toyota and Tokyo Electron, Governor Murai has announced to concentrate funds towards regulatory reform, the popularization of renewable energy, and new industry- stimulating projects such as a next-generation synchrotron facility and Philips Japan’s new R&D center. 。 「Investing in Miyagi」 Speaker: Yoshiko Narita (Director of the International Affairs Division) Presentation 2 16:00~16:30 「The Deciding Factor of Our First Japanese Development Base 」 Speaker: Hiroyuki Tsutsumi (President &CEO, Philips Japan) In March 2017, Hiroyuki Tsutsumi was appointed President and Representative Director of Philips Japan, and President of Philips Respironics.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism in Japan's Contemporary Foreign Policy
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Nationalism in Japan’s Contemporary Foreign Policy: A Consideration of the Cases of China, North Korea, and India Maiko Kuroki A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, February 2013 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of <88,7630> words. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Josh Collins and Greg Demmons. 2 of 3 Abstract Under the Koizumi and Abe administrations, the deterioration of the Japan-China relationship and growing tension between Japan and North Korea were often interpreted as being caused by the rise of nationalism. This thesis aims to explore this question by looking at Japan’s foreign policy in the region and uncovering how political actors manipulated the concept of nationalism in foreign policy discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Democracy in Japan: the Parliamentary Cabinet System Since 1868
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Kentucky University of Kentucky UKnowledge Asian Studies Race, Ethnicity, and Post-Colonial Studies 5-15-2014 Growing Democracy in Japan: The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868 Brian Woodall Georgia Institute of Technology Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Woodall, Brian, "Growing Democracy in Japan: The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868" (2014). Asian Studies. 4. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_asian_studies/4 Growing Democracy in Japan Growing Democracy in Japan The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868 Brian Woodall Due to variations in the technical specifications of different electronic reading devices, some elements of this ebook may not appear as they do in the print edition. Readers are encouraged to experiment with user settings for optimum results. Copyright © 2014 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales Offices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Woodall, Brian.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Japan Tradition Meets Modernity— in This Report We Introduce the Life and Work of a Friend of Japan
    Friends of Japan Tradition Meets Modernity— In this report we introduce the life and work of a friend of Japan. the Japanese Way of Living and Working My first encounter with a Japanese approach to business was in 1995 in Silicon Valley, California. It was then that I was asked to help establish the American arm of one of the best- known Japanese electronics companies. Although my knowledge of Japanese culture was limited, I was determined to work for a Japanese company. I strongly felt that working for a Japanese company would allow me to immerse myself in a new challenge and learn a new way of thinking and doing. An enjoyable part of working for a Japanese multi-national is the way they take delight in making the customer happy. This isn’t just a company mantra; it is an important part of doing business. And, while speed is important, the Japanese cherish a deliberate way of working. Teamwork is also highly regarded, while the individual is allowed to feel that they can make a valued contribution. The Japanese also prioritize personnel development over creating products. When I think about it, of all the Japanese principles of business I’ve encountered, I mostly revere the following: contribution to society, fairness and honesty, cooperation and team spirit, untiring efforts for improvement, courtesy and humility, adaptability, and gratitude. These are the seven core values of Konosuke Matsushita, the Japanese industrialist who founded Panasonic in 1918, and this was the company I would later help establish in the United States. I truly believe these principles are also a core part of Japanese life.
    [Show full text]
  • Tohoku University Fact Book 2008 東北大学概要 2008 Tohoku University Fact Book 2008
    Tohoku University Fact Book 2008 東北大学概要 2008 Tohoku University Fact Book 2008 CONTENTS 〈Introduction〉 Historical Background ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 01 Mission Statement and Towards Tohoku University 2016・・ 02 Message from the President ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 03 Tohoku University’s Official Symbol, School Colors, Song and Logo ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 04 Presidents of Tohoku University ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 05 Japan Academy Members ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 06 Chronological Chart ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 07 Prize Winners ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 09 University Awards ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 12 The 100th Anniversary Projects ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 14 〈Organization〉 Organization Chart ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 17 Administrative Staff ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 20 President Election Committee ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 22 Board of Directors ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 22 Management Committee ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 22 Education and Research Council ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 23 University Personnel ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 24 Faculties ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 25 Graduate Schools ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 25 Research Institutes ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 26 Inter-Department Institutes for Education and Research ・・ 26 University Collaborating Institutions ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 27 Institute of Liberal Arts and Sciences・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 27 WPI Advanced Institute for Materials Research(WPI-AIMR) ・・・・ 27 Information Synergy Organization
    [Show full text]
  • Undivided PDF Version
    Japan’s Official Development Assistance White Paper 2011 White Paper Assistance Official Development Japan’s Japan’s Official Development Assistance White Paper 2011 Japan’s International Japan’s Official Development Assistance Japan’s International Cooperation Japan’s Cooperation White Paper 2011 Japan’s International Cooperation Ministry of Foreign Affairs Ministry of Foreign Affairs Japan’s Official Development Assistance White Paper 2011 Japan’s International Cooperation Ministry of Foreign Affairs Cover Photographs A staff member from the NGO Association for Aid and Relief, Japan distributes relief supplies to a mother and child who were affected by the large- scale drought in the Garissa District of eastern Kenya (Photo: NPO Association for Aid and Relief, Japan) On the deck of a patrol vessel, a Japanese Coast Guard officer gives an explanation to maritime security organization and coast guard members from Asia and the Middle A medical team from Jordan gives aid to residents of East as part of the training “Maritime Law the affected areas in Minamisoma City, Fukushima Enforcement for Asia and MIddle East” Prefecture, following the Great East Japan conducted in Japan Earthquake (Photo: Riho Aihara/JICA) This White Paper can also be viewed on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs website (http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda). In addition to information about official development assistance (ODA) disbursed by Japan, the website also provides a collection of reference materials regarding aid provided by other countries and the activities of international organizations, etc. All titles of individuals given in this White Paper are those current at the time of the applicable event, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Economy Digest
    Japan Economy Digest January 25-31, 2012 The Office of Commercial Affairs, Royal Thai Embassy in Tokyo, Japan Edano's Diplomatic Jaunts Suggest Big Ambitions TOKYO (Nikkei)--Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Yukio Edano has recently been showing off his diplomatic credentials, a curious contrast to his reputation as an expert on domestic affairs. This begs the questions: What has happened, and what is his goal of all this? In the January edition of his quarterly parliamentary reports, Edano listed the countries he visited as METI minister. The headline stated he had traveled the world as minister to protect Japan's national interests as a major trading nation and secure energy resources. Since assuming the office, Edano has visited North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East. He was the only minister not at the first cabinet meeting after Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda reshuffled it earlier this month, as Edano was in Myanmar. "I will be more actively involved this year," Edano said in the January report. Cautious aggression When the magnitude 9 earthquake hit Japan's northeast on March 11, Edano responded to the crisis as former Prime Minister Naoto Kan's chief cabinet secretary. He was always careful about what he said in the many news conferences he held as the tsunami and nuclear crisis unfolded, as he too did not know the exact details involving the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Because of this, Edano developed a reputation as a cautious politician. But his career belies a much more aggressive nature. When Kan made a name for himself in 1996 by aggressively investigating an HIV-tainted blood scandal, which had caused up to two thousand hemophilia patients to contract HIV, Edano, who was a first-term lawmaker with New Party Sakigake, also grilled senior Health Ministry officials in the Diet about their responsibility, looking in every way like a gung-ho opposition lawmaker.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Way Forward: the Prospects for Political Leadership and The
    From Looking for Leadership: The Dilemma of Political Leadership in Japan, 2015 Japan’s Way Forward: 8 The Prospects for Political Leadership and the International Implications James GANNON and Ryo SAHASHI he success that Shinzo Abe had after his 2012 election in breaking Japan’s pattern of one-year premierships offered hope to some that a new era of effective political leadership was at hand for Tthe country. However, it appears that any respite from Japan’s “leadership deficit” will be temporary. As the authors of this volume argue, there are bound to be exceptions to the parade of short-lived prime ministers who struggle to advance their agendas—strong premiers such as Yasuhiro Nakasone, Junichiro Koizumi, and Abe are likely to emerge from time to time—but without further changes to the political system, powerful institutional factors will continue to make it difficult for prime ministers to exercise political leadership in a sustained and effective manner. Of course, Japan has never been renowned for having charismatic, strong political leaders. However, the challenges associated with political leadership are particularly worrying now because over the past quarter century, societal shifts, political reform, and voter expectations have elevated the profile of Japan’s prime minister, making the individual holding that post and the performance of that person increasingly conse- quential. Furthermore, in recent decades, the rise of summit diplomacy James Gannon is the executive director of the Japan Center for International Exchange (JCIE/USA), and Ryo Sahashi is an associate professor at Kanagawa University. 181 182 LOOKING FOR LEADERSHIP and advances in communications technology have expanded the diplo- matic role of heads of government.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States and Japan in Global Context: 2015
    THE EDWIN O. REISCHAUER CENTER FOR EAST ASIAN STUDIES THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN IN GLOBAL CONTEXT: 2015 THE PAUL H. NITZE SCHOOL OF ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL STUDIES THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY Washington, D.C. Edwin O. Reischauer October 15, 1910 – September 1, 1990 Yearbook Class of 2015 From Left to Right: Sung Hui “Sophie” Yang, Jeffrey Bond, Ju Hyung Kim, Luoxi Dao, Ji Won Kwon, Malcolm Whitehead, Michael Wakcher, Professor William Brooks, Evan Sankey, Benjamin Garton, Ian Hamilton, Michael Kotler, Waichiro Katsuda, Yiwei “Jenny” Pan TABLE OF CONTENTS The Year at the Reischauer Center 1 Reischauer Center Events, 2014-2015 7 Introduction 10 William L. Brooks For U.S.-Japan Relations, the JET Program Is a Hidden National Treasure 46 Malcolm Whitehead U.S.-Japan Cultural Exchange in a New Era of Public Diplomacy 73 Michael Wakcher New U.S.-Japan Partnership in Disaster Management and Japan’s Role 95 Waichiro Katsuda India and the US-Japan Alliance 113 Evan Sankey Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s Central Asia Strategy: Is it Effective? 129 Ian Hamilton Trilateral security cooperation in Northeast Asia 157 Ju Hyong Kim Japan’s Trade Agreement Strategies: Three Case Studies 172 Ji Won Kwon Changing Trade Patterns among the U.S., Japan and China: Does Politics Trump Market Forces? 205 Jenny Iwei Pan Impact of “Abenomics” on Mergers and Acquisition Trends in Japan 222 Luoxi Dao Japan’s Long Road to Corporate Governance Reform 240 Ben Garton Building Japan’s Entrepreneurial Ecosystem 258 Jeff Bond Class Research Trip to Tokyo, March 2014: Photo Album 281 1 THE YEAR AT THE REISCHAUER CENTER The 2014-2015 academic year, during which the Reischauer Center celebrated its thirtieth anniversary, was a historic one--for the Center, SAIS, and for trans-Pacific relations.
    [Show full text]