DOCSLIB.ORG

A Century of Research Behind Summit Learning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Century of Research Behind Summit Learning ThE ScIeNcE oF SuMmIt A CeNtUrY oF ReSeArCh BeHiNd SuMmIt LeArNiNg More than 100 years of learning science, psychology, and workforce development research informs Summit Learning — our personalized approach to teaching and learning inspired by the vision to equip every student to lead a fulfilled life. We translate the science of learning into the intentional design of our schools to achieve student success in four outcomes: Cognitive Skills, Content Knowledge, Habits of Success, and Sense of Purpose. This comprehensive research timeline includes a diverse range of perspectives and groundbreaking works that have been formative influences on Summit Learning and each of our student outcomes. 1969 1968 Jean Piaget details the 1962 intricate relationship 1902 1960 Benjamin Bloom argues between mental and that all students should physical growth Everett Rogers be given the necessary , from birth John Dewey advocates for development Jerome Bruner makes presents a five-point time and opportunities through adolescence a community- and child- the case for a spiral framework for how to master content centered curriculum that starts innovations are before moving on to that offers socially-based curriculum in early childhood adopted by users learn new content experiences aligned with over time rigorous content standards 1988 1988 Donna R. Recht and Lauren 1986 1978 Leslie find prior knowledge has Robert Glaser and Michelene significant effect on learners’ Chi draw attention to the Albert Bandura reveals Lev Vygotsky emphasizes retention and summarizing of cognitive and psychological his robust theory on the essential role of social information after reading conditions that enhance and the cognitive and social relationships in cognitive limit the development of factors that affect development expertise human motivation 1991 1995 1998 1994 1995 Martin Haberman Gloria Ladson-Billings Grant Wiggins challenges urban advocates for and details Elizabeth Cohen and Rachel provides improved educators to focus on Daniel Goleman performance-based Lotan blend theory with definition of culturally- creating a learning introduces model for , focused on relevant pedagogy and assessment environment that fits effective teaching strategies emotional intelligence best practices for teacher helping students improve the needs and nature of for group work, emphasizing encompassing five skills, multiple ability and education urban youth bilingual which include self- classrooms regulation and empathy 2001 2000 Linda Darling-Hammond presents learner-centered solutions for systemic Jeannie Oakes spotlights 2000 changes in the American the historical and harmful 1999 education system effects of tracking in the American classroom John D. Bransford et al. combine theories of Buck Institute for Education how we learn with best definesproject-based practices for effective learning, which Summit adopts learning in the classroom to describe its project-based learning pillar 2001 2007 2003 2007 Carol Ann Tomlinson collates Erik De Corte emphasizes the need John Hattie and Helen field-tested and best practices for active learning experiences and Timperley suggest Carol Dweck explains for differentiated instruction the importance of metacognition and best ways to deliver how to leverage mindset in multiple ability classrooms communication skills in transfer of individualized feedback to better fulfill individual knowledge in the classroom potential 2008 2008 2008 2008 Linda Darling-Hammond 2008 Clayton M. Christensen and Brigid Barron present William Damon identifies et al. apply disruptive a comprehensive review of key factors that help young David Conley sets forth the change theory to K-12 the research behind inquiry- adults to identify their Cognitive Skills, Content Arthur Costa and Bena public education based and cooperative Sense of Purpose Knowledge, and “habits Kallick present a guide learning approaches of mind” necessary for for shaping schools high school students to be around 16 habits of college ready mind 2010 2010 2011 2009 2009 Thomas R. Guskey and Teresa Amabile Tom Rath and Jim Jane M. Bailey propose a John Hattie’s pivotal Daniel Willingham identifies the leadership Harter explore how four-pillar framework for meta-study uncovers emphasizes the traits and environmental five universal and effective grading and core influences, like importance of background forces that elicit more interconnected factors reporting systems strong student-teacher knowledge in the critical productive and happier influence overall relationships, on teaching thinking process employees and learning well-being 2013 2013 2011 Martin E. P. Seligman et al. 2012 identifies three interrelated Lucas Education Research 2012 factors essential to Daniel Kahneman bridges applies a rigorous identifying a sense of ConnectEd bridges the intuitive mind with the research approach to individual purpose research on workforce Camille Farrington et al. logical and explains how project-based learning development and (University of Chicago the two work together to and begins developing job readiness with Consortium in Chicago shape human behavior a classroom-based PBL secondary education School Research) link social- model in new framework for emotional skills with higher education student achievement 2014 2014 2014 Peter C. Brown et al. 2014 Ron Berger et al. present concrete practices for advocate for self- mastery learning, like building David S. Yeager et al. proposes directed learning background knowledge, based Angela Duckworth that Sense of Purpose and and student-engaged on recent research in cognitive identifies grit — a blend of connection to cause beyond self assessments psychology and related fields passion and perseverance can improve self-regulation on — as key variable in high academic tasks achievers 2015 2015 2015 2014 Angela Duckworth and Jo Boaler provides 2014 David Yeager discourage David Perkins introduces roadmap of research- Charles Fadel et use of evaluative based strategies for a framework for creating a al. present a four- Zaretta Hammond frames assessments for social- helping all children curriculum that prepares dimensional framework cultural responsiveness emotional skills be successful in learners to build a thriving of competencies for as a process that future society mathematics successful 21st century teachers can learn to learners build better relationships with students 2016 2016 2015 2016 Todd Rose proposes an Trevor Fronius et al. (WestEd) individualized, versus Carissa Romero (Mindset K. Brooke Stafford- answers questions about standardized, approach to Scholars Network) connects Brizard’s and Turnaround restorative justice as a performance assessment students’ sense of for Children’s Building favorable approach to school in education and in the belonging with improved Blocks for Learning and student discipline workforce engagement in the learning framework integrates social process and cognitive pathways for optimal developments 2016 2016 Kristina Zeiser et al. (AIR) make case for positive 2016 relationship between 2017 Daniel Schwartz competency-based et al. categorize education and greater Thomas Dee and Emily and describe 26 autonomy over and ToDaY David Osher et al. (AIR) Penner suggest that “scientifically proven” motivation for learning present a comprehensive supportive and culturally- approaches to case for student- relevant teaching can lead to learning centered, individualized increased performance in at- classrooms and schools risk students Cognitive Skills Content Knowledge Habits of Success Sense of Purpose Formative Influences.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mindsets and Skills That Promote Long-Term Learning
    Academic Tenacity Mindsets and Skills that Promote Long-Term Learning Carol S. Dweck | Gregory M. Walton | Geoffrey L. Cohen Table of Contents Introduction 2 Defining Academic Tenacity 4 Measuring Tenacity and Its Effects on Achievement 5 Mindsets and Goals 5 Social Belonging 11 Self-Regulation and Self-Control 12 Interventions that Improve Academic Achievement by Developing Tenacity 14 Mindset Interventions 15 Social Belonging and Value Affirmation Interventions 17 Identity and Self-Relevance Interventions 19 Teaching Self-Regulation 21 Integrating Curricula with Practices that Promote Academic Tenacity 21 How Good Teachers and Schools Foster Academic Tenacity 22 Challenge 22 Scaffolding 26 Belonging 30 Endnotes 33 The authors would like to acknowledge David Paunesku and David Yeager for their valuable assistance with this report and KSA-Plus Communications for its editorial and design assistance. Academic Tenacity | 1 Introduction In a nationwide survey of high school dropouts, 69 percent said that school had not motivated or inspired them to work hard.1 In fact, many of the students who remain in school are not motivated or inspired either, and the more time students spend in K–12 education the worse it gets.2 This lack of motivation to do well in school represents a serious loss of human potential, with implications for students’ well-being later in life and for our country’s future economic growth. What prevents students from working hard in school? Is it something about them or is it something about school? More important, is there a solution to this problem? Most educational reforms focus on curriculum and pedagogy—what material is taught and how it is taught.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Instructional Design and Technology: Part II: a History of Instructional Design
    AAH GRAPHICS, INC. / (540) 933-6210 / FAX 933-6523 / 05-30-2001 / 10:39 A History of Instructional Design and Technology: Part II: A History of Instructional Design Robert A. Reiser This is the second of a two-part article that In Part I of this article, I presented the follow- discusses the history of the field of ing definition of the field of instructional design instructional design and technology in the and technology: United States. The first part, which focused on the history of instructional media, appeared in The field of instructional design and technology the previous issue of this journal (volume 49, encompasses the analysis of learning and performance number 1). This part of the article focuses on problems, and the design, development, implementa- the history of instructional design. Starting tion, evaluation and management of instructional and with a description of the efforts to develop noninstructional processes and resources intended to improve learning and performance in a variety of set- training programs during World War II, and tings, particularly educational institutions and the continuing on through the publication of some workplace. Professionals in the field of instructional of the first instructional design models in the design and technology often use systematic instruc- 1960s and 1970s, major events in the tional design procedures and employ a variety of development of the instructional design instructional media to accomplish their goals. More- over, in recent years, they have paid increasing atten- process are described. Factors that have tion to noninstructional solutions to some performance affected the field of instructional design over problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between the Goal Orientations of Educational
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE GOAL ORIENTATIONS OF EDUCATIONAL PERSONNEL AND THEIR PRACTICAL IMPLICIT BELIEFS ABOUT STUDENTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Education Department Carson-Newman University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education By Christy Preston Tomisek March 30, 2018 Copyright © 2017 by Christy Preston Tomisek All Rights Reserved. ii iii I hereby grant permission to the Education Department, Carson-Newman University, to reproduce this research in part or in full for professional purposes, with the understanding that in no case will it be for financial profit to any person or institution. Christy Preston Tomisek Date: April 4, 2018 iv Abstract The purpose of this study was to further understanding concerning how the goal orientations and implicit ability beliefs of independent school personnel affect their perceptions of student capability for academic success. The quantitative study assessed the goal orientation of middle school educators and admissions counselors in independent schools and then compared it to their feedback concerning beliefs about the success potential of hypothetical students. Participant beliefs about ability range from a fixed mindset, believing that ability is innate, to a growth mindset, believing that ability is malleable (Dweck, 2006). Mindset is often manifested through one’s goal orientation, or motivation for achievement (Dweck & Leggett, 1988). Though much evidence exists concerning the benefits of a growth mindset in students, researchers are just beginning to understand how educational personnel are influenced by their own mindsets and how teachers, in turn, influence the mindsets of their students. Results of the present study indicate moderate associations between the variables of goal orientation and mindset concerning student success potential among independent school personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarter II, 2016 from the President
    OperantsQUARTER II, 2016 from the president f you are a practitioner, what do you do if your usual procedures aren’t working? Most of us ask others for help. The final authority, however, is not a supervisor or colleague. It is the underlying science. B. F. Skinner described Iscience as “first of all an attitude. It is a disposition to deal with the facts, rather than what one has said about them.” But what are “facts?” They are descriptions about how the world works. New discoveries may extend our understanding of phenomena. But one thing about science does not change: it does not include non-material agencies as causes of physical, biological, or behavioral events. As behavior analysts or as behaviorologists, we do not appeal to personality, selfishness, motivation, or other inferred “agencies” to explain behavior. These “agencies” do not consist of behavior. Behavior exists inside our skins of course. Like overt actions, internal behavior depends upon contingencies: the relation between existing actions, their results, and the circumstances in which those relations exist. If a procedure is not working, we do not attribute failure to an internal agency resisting change. We attribute lack of success to a set of contingencies that we need to change. Julie S. Vargas, Ph.D. President, B. F. Skinner Foundation Arabic Translated by Nidal Daou ماذا تفعل لو كنت مامرسااومامرسة يفً علم النفس او تحليل السلوك التطبيقي، و األساليب االعتيادية مل تنجح؟ يف ظروف كهذه، نلجأ لآلخرين للمساعدة. املرجع االخري فهو ليس املرشف)ة( عىل عملك او الزميل)ة(. إمنا املرجع االخري فهو العلم األسايس.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 50 Years of LRDC (PDF)
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Celebrating 50 Years of LRDC This report was published in 2014 by the University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center. THIS REPORT CELEBRATES THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER’S (LRDC) 50 YEARS AS A LEADING INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON LEARNING AND EDUCATION. IT PROVIDES GLIMPSES OF LRDC OVER THE YEARS AND HIGHLIGHTS SOME OF THE EXCITING WORK THAT OCCUPIES OUR CURRENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENDA. The Center’s interconnected programs of research and development have reflected its mission of stimulating interaction between research and practice across a broad spectrum of problems, from the neural basis of learning to the development of intelligent tutors to educational policy. Among research institutions in learning and education, this interconnected breadth is unique. The Center’s research has been equally wide-ranging in the domains of learning it has studied. Reading, mathematics, and science—staples of education—have been a continuing focus over much of LRDC’s 50 years. However, the Center also has addressed less-studied learning domains (e.g., history, geography, avionics, and law) as well as the reasoning and intellectual abilities that serve learning across domains. Moreover, social settings for learning, including those outside schools; teaching effectiveness; and technol- ogy for learning are all part of LRDC’s research story. LRDC’s ability to sustain research programs across these diverse, intersecting problems owes much to the cooperation of its partnering schools and depart- ments in the University. The leadership of the University of Pittsburgh has made possible what is often very difficult: a research center that has been able to effectively pursue truly cross-disciplinary research programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Lauren B. Resnick Learning Research and Development Center University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15260 412­624­7485
    Lauren B. Resnick Learning Research and Development Center University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15260 412­624­7485 Education A.B., History (magna cum laude, Radcliffe History Prize): Radcliffe College, 1957 A.M., Teaching: Harvard Graduate School of Education, 1958 Ed.D., Research in Instruction: Harvard Graduate School of Education, 1962 Professional Appointments University of Pittsburgh: University Professor, Psychology /Cognitive Science 2006­present Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh 1972­present Director, 1977­present; Associate Director, 1973­77; Director of Research and Development, 1972­73; Research Associate, 1966­72 Institute for Learning, LRDC, University of Pittsburgh: Founder and Director 1995­present Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh 1966­present Professor, 1977­2006; Associate Professor, 1971­77; Assistant Professor, 1966­71 Achieve, Inc.: Senior Associate, 1999­present Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh: Resident Fellow 1989­present School of Education, University of Pittsburgh 1966­2005 Professor, 1977­2005; Associate Professor, 1971­77; Assistant Professor, 1966­71 New Standards, Co­Founder and Co­Director 1990­1999 National Center on Education and the Economy, Senior Fellow 1996­1999 Basic Systems, Inc.: Senior Scientist and Staff Consultant 1963­1966 City University of New York, Office of Research and Evaluation, Division of Teacher Education: Lecturer 1962­1963 Harvard University Committee on Programmed Instruction and Laboratory for Research
    [Show full text]
  • A Cognitive-Affective System Theory of Personality: Reconceptualizing Situations, Dispositions, Dynamics, and Invariance in Personality Structure
    Psychological Review Copyright 1995 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 1995, Vol. 102, No. 2, 246-268 0033-295X/95/$3,00 A Cognitive-Affective System Theory of Personality: Reconceptualizing Situations, Dispositions, Dynamics, and Invariance in Personality Structure Walter Mischel and Yuichi Shoda Columbia University A theory was proposed to reconcile paradoxical findings on the invariance of personality and the variability of behavior across situations. For this purpose, individuals were assumed to differ in (a) the accessibility of cognitive-affective mediating units (such as encodings, expectancies and beliefs, affects, and goals) and (b) the organization of relationships through which these units interact with each other and with psychological features of situations. The theory accounts for individual differ- ences in predictable patterns of variability across situations (e.g., if A. then she X, but ifE then she Y), as well as for overall average levels of behavior, as essential expressions or behavioral signatures of the same underlying personality system. Situations, personality dispositions, dynamics, and struc- ture were reconceptualized from this perspective. The construct of personality rests on the assumption that in- dividual's characteristic average levels of behavior. Toward that dividuals are characterized by distinctive qualities that are rela- goal, we propose a cognitive-affective system theory of person- tively invariant across situations and over time. In a century of ality, drawing in part on the growing body of evidence and the- personality research, however, abundant evidence has docu- orizing on individual differences in social and emotional infor- mented that individual differences in social behaviors tend to be mation processing (e.g., as reviewed in Contrada, Leventhal, surprisingly variable across different situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Carol Dweck the Growth Mindset Transcript
    Carol Dweck The Growth Mindset Transcript Which Ikey glad-hand so rateably that Willard ingenerated her dopes? Schmalziest Jean-Pierre usually engraves some premier or prejudice latently. Sphery Xerxes usually lams some synchronisers or excelling ungravely. What makes them and ask a far more aware of percy spencer discovered that different areas of my belief that anyone interested in a positive energy or dweck the carol growth mindset transcript Carol Dweck called Growth Mindset and how obtain a growth mindset versus a fixed mindset can positively impact your soccer and. Summary Students with a growth mindset believe that background can be developed These students focus on learning over it looking for see effort as fellow key of success and thrive in you face went a challenge. Thank you carol growth transcript there will i want to kind of research skills online and years in communities around every single most popular book. Include an essay or growth transcript. Writing workshop was an example, transcripts are mathematically traumatized and manufacturers may lead to. 7 Ways to Stay Positive During Difficult Times Clarity Clinic. 4 Steps To Developing A Growth Mindset Adminbandit's Weblog. This online certificate from carol dweck the growth mindset transcript a little choosy, the best info, independently and made me to believe their family, and i treat a british lawmakers to. CaptionSync Smart Player. Acknowledge them to think of daily through the web applications in the carol dweck the growth mindset transcript. TRANSCRIPT New Student Special Episode 3 UWE Bristol. Develop growth transcript new path carol dweck likes to scrutiny and the right from somewhere in the battle for me to! Video Transcript The Power if Belief Mindset and Success.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between Career Burnout and Mindset Levels of New York State Principals
    St. John's University St. John's Scholar Theses and Dissertations 2020 AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CAREER BURNOUT AND MINDSET LEVELS OF NEW YORK STATE PRINCIPALS Christopher Korolczuk Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.stjohns.edu/theses_dissertations ã Copyright by Christopher Korolczuk 2020 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CAREER BURNOUT AND MINDSET LEVELS OF NEW YORK STATE PRINCIPALS Christopher Korolczuk Leading a school is a demanding job. Over 20% of school principals in the United States leave their position annually, especially in disadvantaged areas where consistent leadership is most needed (Battle, 2010; Snyder, de Brey, & Dillow, 2016). The myriad of responsibilities and external forces imposed on school principals oftentimes lead to career burnout, which adversely impacts the staff, students, and communities they serve. Dweck (2006) states that individuals who hold a growth mindset regarding their skills and intelligences view challenges, such as ones that may lead to career burnout, as opportunities for growth and development. However, research examining the relationship between career burnout and mindset levels of school principals is limited. The present study examined current literature on the causes, symptoms, and prevention methods relevant to career burnout of school principals, as well as the history, benefits, and barriers of possessing a growth mindset. Additionally, quantitative methods were used to explore the relationship between mindset and burnout using Pearson’s Correlation, t-tests, ANOVA and a hierarchal regression. Survey data from 170 New York State principals was collected using a demographic questionnaire, the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Educators Survey (MBI-ES) (Maslach, Jackson, & Schwab, 1986), and the Dweck Mindset Instrument (DMI) (Dweck, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Theories Theories
    Understanding & Using Educational Theories 00_AUBERY_RILEY_2E_FM.indd 1 23/10/2018 3:54:35 PM Sara Miller McCune founded SAGE Publishing in 1965 to support the dissemination of usable knowledge and educate a global community. SAGE publishes more than 1000 journals and over 800 new books each year, spanning a wide range of subject areas. Our growing selection of library products includes archives, data, case studies and video. SAGE remains majority owned by our founder and after her lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that secures the company’s continued independence. Los Angeles | London | New Delhi | Singapore | Washington DC | Melbourne 00_AUBERY_RILEY_2E_FM.indd 2 23/10/2018 3:54:35 PM 2nd edition Understanding & Using Educational Theories Karl Aubrey and Alison Riley 00_AUBERY_RILEY_2E_FM.indd 3 23/10/2018 3:54:35 PM SAGE Publications Ltd © Karl Aubrey and Alison Riley 2019 1 Oliver’s Yard 55 City Road First edition published 2015 London EC1Y 1SP Reprinted 2015, 2016 (twice), 2017 (twice) & 2018 SAGE Publications Inc. 2455 Teller Road This second edition published 2019 Thousand Oaks, California 91320 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication Mathura Road may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by New Delhi 110 044 any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright 3 Church Street Licensing Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Personalized Learning Technology and the New Behaviorism
    1 Personalized Learning Technology and the New Behaviorism: Beyond Freedom and Dignity1 In 2016, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced that he would be joining the National Science Foundation and Gates Foundations in spending hundreds of millions of dollars to support the development of technologies for “personalized learning.” These technologies promise to provide learners or users with interactive content that is tailored with precision to their preferences and previous behaviors—much like Facebook’s newsfeed does. And also like Facebook, they accomplish this by using “big data” and “analytics,” recordings of clicking, scrolling and typing of many thousands of users. However, analytics experts, sociologists of technology and most recently, several former Facebook and Google executives understand these techniques as ultimately representing a sophisticated and highly effective form of Skinnerian operant conditioning—one that customizes Skinner’s “schedules of reinforcement” precisely to learners’ behavioral patterns. First explaining how this “new behaviorism” is instantiated in personalized learning design and technology, this paper then argues that such an approach is antithetical to the most basic priorities and purposes of education: Namely, to cultivate in students a sense of ownership in their own learning, and responsibility for their own behavior and its effects on others. Introduction Psychologist B.F. Skinner (1904-1990), inventor of “radical behaviorism,” the “operant conditioning chamber” and the “teaching machine,” has been making a comeback. His spirit is returning not as much to the laboratories and publications of academic psychologists as it is to 1 I owe a debt of gratitude to Leif Nelson of Boise State University and Ben Williamson of the University of Edinburgh for their careful reading and helpful feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of Instructional and Performance Technology
    Foundations of Instructional and Performance Technology Seung Youn Chyung HRD Press, Inc. • Amherst • Massachusetts Copyright © 2008 by HRD Press, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this text may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by: HRD Press, Inc. 22 Amherst Road Amherst, MA 01002 1-800-822-2801 (U.S. and Canada) 413-253-3488 413-253-3490 (fax) www.hrdpress.com ISBN 978-1-59996-136-1 Cover design by Eileen Klockars Editorial services by Suzanne Bay and Sally Farnham Production services by Anctil Virtual Office Table of Contents PREFACE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CHAPTER 1. TECHNOLOGY AND INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY.................. 1 TECHNOLOGY AND INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY.......................................... 3 Who, When, and Where: Instructional Technologists .............................. 5 Why: Linking Means to Ends ................................................................... 7 What: Using Hard and Soft Technology .................................................. 8 How: Using Systematic and Systemic Approaches.................................. 9 REFERENCES .................................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER 2. FOUNDATIONS OF INSTRUCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT .................. 15 FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT .................. 17 Edward Lee Thorndike (1874–1949) ......................................................
    [Show full text]