DOCSLIB.ORG

December 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
December 2015 Arctic Report Card 2015 December 2015 www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard Citing the complete report: M. O. Jeffries, J. Richter-Menge, and J. E. Overland, Eds., 2015: Arctic Report Card 2015, http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard. Citing an essay (for example): Derksen, C., R. Brown, L. Mudryk, and K. Luojus, 2015: Snow [in Arctic Report Card 2015], http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard. 1 Arctic Report Card 2015 Table of Contents Authors and Affiliations .............................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 7 Surface Air Temperature ...........................................................................................................10 Terrestrial Snow Cover .............................................................................................................17 Greenland Ice Sheet .................................................................................................................22 Sea Ice .....................................................................................................................................33 Sea Surface Temperature .........................................................................................................41 Arctic Ocean Primary Productivity .............................................................................................44 Tundra Greenness ....................................................................................................................54 River Discharge ........................................................................................................................60 Walruses in a Time of Climate Change .....................................................................................66 Climate Change is Pushing Boreal Fish Northwards to the Arctic..............................................75 Community-based Observing Network Systems for Arctic Change Detection and Response....82 Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Velocity: New Data Sets .............................................................89 2 Arctic Report Card 2015 Authors and Affiliations L. Alessa, Center for Resilient Communities, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA; International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA; Department of Homeland Security Arctic Domain Awareness Center, Anchorage, AK, USA M. M. Aschan, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway D. Atkinson, University of Victoria, Department of Geography, Victoria, BC, Canada U. S. Bhatt, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA P. A. Bieniek, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA N. T. Boelman, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA J. E. Box, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen, Denmark R. Brown, Climate Research Division, Environment Canada, Toronto, Canada J. Cappelen, Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark J. C. Comiso, Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA L. W. Cooper, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD, USA C. Derksen, Climate Research Division, Environment Canada, Toronto, Canada A. V. Dolgov, Knipovich Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography, Murmansk, Russia H. E. Epstein, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA S. Farrell, NOAA Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA R. S. Fausto, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen, Denmark X. Fettweis, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium B. C. Forbes, Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland D. Forbes, Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Dartmouth, NS, Canada M. Fossheim, Institute of Marine Research, Norway K. E. Frey, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA S. Gerland, Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway R. R. Gradinger, Institute of Marine Research, Tromsø, Norway 3 Arctic Report Card 2015 J. M. Grebmeier, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD, USA D. Griffith, Center for Resilient Communities, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA E. Hanna, Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK K. Hansen, Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark I. Hanssen-Bauer, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway S. Hendricks, Alfred Wegener Institute, Bremerhaven, Germany R. M. Holmes, Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA, USA R. B. Ingvaldsen, Institute of Marine Research, Norway M. O. Jeffries, Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA, USA E. Johannesen, Institute of Marine Research, Norway I. Joughin, Polar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA S. -J. Kim, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon, Republic of Korea A. Kliskey, Center for Resilient Communities, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA; International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA K. M. Kovacs, Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, Norway P. Lemons, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK, USA K. Luojus, Arctic Research Centre, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland C. Lydersen, Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, Norway J. G. MacCracken, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, AK, USA M. Macias-Fauria, School of Geography and the Environment, University Oxford, Oxford, UK J. W. McClelland, University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, TX, USA W. Meier, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA T. Moon, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA T. Mote, Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA L. Mudryk, Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Canada T. Mustonen, Snowchange Cooperative, Selkie, Finland I. H. Myers-Smith, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK 4 Arctic Report Card 2015 J. E. Overland, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA, USA D. Perovich, ERDC - CRREL, 72 Lyme Road, Hanover USA; Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA J. Pinzon, Biospheric Science Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA R. Primicerio, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway A. Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA P. Pulsifer, National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA M. K. Raynolds, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA J. Richter-Menge, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, USA A. I. Shiklomanov, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA; Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Moscow, Russia C. J. P. P. Smeets, Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands S. K. Sweet, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA S. E. Tank, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada M. Tedesco, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA; Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA R. L. Thoman, NOAA, National Weather Service, Fairbanks, AK, USA M. -L. Timmermans, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA J. -É. Tremblay, Québec-Océan and Takuvik, Biology Department, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada M. Tretiakov, Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia M. Tschudi, Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA C. J. Tucker, Biospheric Science Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA D. van As, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen, Denmark R. S. W. van de Wal, Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands J. Wahr, Department of Physics & Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA D. A. Walker, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA J. E. Walsh, International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA 5 Arctic Report Card 2015 M. Wang, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 6 Arctic Report Card 2015 Executive Summary M. O. Jeffries1, J. Richter-Menge2, J. E. Overland3 1Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA, USA 2U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, USA 3National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA, USA December 7, 2015 The Arctic Report Card (www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/) considers a range of environmental observations throughout the Arctic, and is updated annually. As in previous years, the 2015 update to the Arctic Report Card highlights the changes that continue to occur in both the physical and biological components of the Arctic environmental system. The average annual surface air temperature anomaly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kujalleq Nutaaq ERHVERVSUDVIKLINGS FORSLAG for Kommune Kujalleq
    Kujalleq Nutaaq ERHVERVSUDVIKLINGS FORSLAG for Kommune Kujalleq Version 1.0 - 2020 Innovation South Greenland A/S, Torvevej 34, Postboks 313, 3920 Qaqortoq, Greenland Oqarasuaat +299 537777, e-mail: [email protected] Forord Innovation South Greenland arbejder målrettet for at få udviklingen i gang i hele Sydgrønland. Dette dokument afspejler anbefalingerne til Kommunalbestyrelsen. 1. Ser man på infrastrukturen er det gennem en årrække blevet svært at rejse rundt i Kommunen. 2. Det er en udfordring at få vareforsyninger, dyrt og svært at sende varer fra sydgrønland og svært at holde møder osv. Af disse og flere andre årsager er udviklingen gået nærmest i stå. 3. Resultatet har været at der er sket en gradvis en fraflytning. Desuden har personer med højere kompetencer fået gode jobs andre steder. Det er ganske enkelt blevet svært at skabe et livsgrundlag på et personligt plan, for familier og for erhvervslivet. Derfor har man etableret Innovation South Greenland A/S for at skabe vækst, udvikling og rådgivning af iværksættere. En konkret opgave som er blevet givet Innovation South Greenland A/S er at finde en løsning for Narsarsuaq i et nyt scenarie. Det vigtige er imidlertid at se på hele Sydgrønland som en sammenhængende region. Den første forudsætning er at skabe håb og troværdighed. Dernæst at man får en tidssvarende infrastruktur på plads. Ydermere skal der opdyrkes en iværksætterkultur som understøttes af igangsætning af konkrete projekter. Sidst og ikke mindst skal der tiltrækkes investeringer udefra og indgås bilaterale aftaler som kan styrke regionen. Erhvervsudviklingen skal baseres på et tæt samarbejde med Erhvervslivet, Kommunen, Selvstyret og Uddannelsesinstitutionerne i kommunen.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin 28, 2013, 69-72
    Darkening of the Greenland ice sheet due to the melt- albedo feedback observed at PROMICE weather stations Dirk van As, Robert S. Fausto, William T. Colgan, Jason E. Box and the PROMICE project team* The Greenland ice sheet is losing mass (Barletta et al. 2012) melt, the relationship between albedo and air temperature, and at least half of this loss is caused by an increase in surface observed at PROMICE stations, is examined in this study. melt (e.g. Tedesco et al. 2013). The other part is caused by increased dynamic mass loss, as marine-terminating glaciers lose resistive stresses (Nick et al. 2009) due to both retreat and meltwater lubrication at the bed (Sasgen et al. 2012). In 2007, the Programme for Monitoring of the Greenland Ice Sheet (PROMICE) was initiated with the aim of gain- ing an insight into the causes of the ice-mass budget changes 1500 KPC based on quantitative observations. This is primarily done 2000 by assessing how much mass is gained as snow accumulation on the surface versus how much is lost by calving and surface ablation (Ahlstrøm et al. 2008). PROMICE monitors the THU 2500 surface mass balance by means of automatic weather stations (AWSs) designed to quantify accumulation and ablation, as well as the specific energy sources contributing to ablation. These observations are vital to interpreting the physical 3000 mechanisms for ice-sheet response to climate change and for UPE SCO the calibration and validation of both satellite observations and climate models. In the wake of several record-breaking warm summers – increasing surface melt rate and extent (Nghiem et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeszyt 10. Morza I Oceany
    Uwaga: Niniejsza publikacja została opracowana według stanu na 2008 rok i nie jest aktualizowana. Zamieszczony na stronie internetowej Komisji Standaryzacji Nazw Geograficznych poza Granica- mi Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej plik PDF jest jedynie zapisem cyfrowym wydrukowanej publikacji. Wykaz zalecanych przez Komisję polskich nazw geograficznych świata (Urzędowy wykaz polskich nazw geograficznych świata), wraz z aktualizowaną na bieżąco listą zmian w tym wykazie, zamieszczo- ny jest na stronie internetowej pod adresem: http://ksng.gugik.gov.pl/wpngs.php. KOMISJA STANDARYZACJI NAZW GEOGRAFICZNYCH POZA GRANICAMI RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ przy Głównym Geodecie Kraju NAZEWNICTWO GEOGRAFICZNE ŚWIATA Zeszyt 10 Morza i oceany GŁÓWNY URZĄD GEODEZJI I KARTOGRAFII Warszawa 2008 KOMISJA STANDARYZACJI NAZW GEOGRAFICZNYCH POZA GRANICAMI RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ przy Głównym Geodecie Kraju Waldemar Rudnicki (przewodniczący), Andrzej Markowski (zastępca przewodniczącego), Maciej Zych (zastępca przewodniczącego), Katarzyna Przyszewska (sekretarz); członkowie: Stanisław Alexandrowicz, Andrzej Czerny, Janusz Danecki, Janusz Gołaski, Romuald Huszcza, Sabina Kacieszczenko, Dariusz Kalisiewicz, Artur Karp, Zbigniew Obidowski, Jerzy Ostrowski, Jarosław Pietrow, Jerzy Pietruszka, Andrzej Pisowicz, Ewa Wolnicz-Pawłowska, Bogusław R. Zagórski Opracowanie Kazimierz Furmańczyk Recenzent Maciej Zych Komitet Redakcyjny Andrzej Czerny, Joanna Januszek, Sabina Kacieszczenko, Dariusz Kalisiewicz, Jerzy Ostrowski, Waldemar Rudnicki, Maciej Zych Redaktor prowadzący Maciej
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial Evaluation of Arctic Sea Ice and Regional Limitations in CMIP6 Historical Simulations
    1AUGUST 2021 W A T T S E T A L . 6399 A Spatial Evaluation of Arctic Sea Ice and Regional Limitations in CMIP6 Historical Simulations a a a a MATTHEW WATTS, WIESLAW MASLOWSKI, YOUNJOO J. LEE, JACLYN CLEMENT KINNEY, AND b ROBERT OSINSKI a Department of Oceanography, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California b Institute of Oceanology of Polish Academy of Sciences, Sopot, Poland (Manuscript received 29 June 2020, in final form 28 April 2021) ABSTRACT: The Arctic sea ice response to a warming climate is assessed in a subset of models participating in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6), using several metrics in comparison with satellite observations and results from the Pan-Arctic Ice Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System and the Regional Arctic System Model. Our study examines the historical representation of sea ice extent, volume, and thickness using spatial analysis metrics, such as the integrated ice edge error, Brier score, and spatial probability score. We find that the CMIP6 multimodel mean captures the mean annual cycle and 1979–2014 sea ice trends remarkably well. However, individual models experience a wide range of uncertainty in the spatial distribution of sea ice when compared against satellite measurements and reanalysis data. Our metrics expose common and individual regional model biases, which sea ice temporal analyses alone do not capture. We identify large ice edge and ice thickness errors in Arctic subregions, implying possible model specific limitations in or lack of representation of some key physical processes. We postulate that many of them could be related to the oceanic forcing, especially in the marginal and shelf seas, where seasonal sea ice changes are not adequately simulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking About the Arctic's Future
    By Lawson W. Brigham ThinkingThinking aboutabout thethe Arctic’sArctic’s Future:Future: ScenariosScenarios forfor 20402040 MIKE DUNN / NOAA CLIMATE PROGRAM OFFICE, NABOS 2006 EXPEDITION The warming of the Arctic could These changes have profound con- ing in each of the four scenarios. mean more circumpolar sequences for the indigenous people, • Transportation systems, espe- for all Arctic species and ecosystems, cially increases in marine and air transportation and access for and for any anticipated economic access. the rest of the world—but also development. The Arctic is also un- • Resource development—for ex- an increased likelihood of derstood to be a large storehouse of ample, oil and gas, minerals, fish- yet-untapped natural resources, a eries, freshwater, and forestry. overexploited natural situation that is changing rapidly as • Indigenous Arctic peoples— resources and surges of exploration and development accel- their economic status and the im- environmental refugees. erate in places like the Russian pacts of change on their well-being. Arctic. • Regional environmental degra- The combination of these two ma- dation and environmental protection The Arctic is undergoing an jor forces—intense climate change schemes. extraordinary transformation early and increasing natural-resource de- • The Arctic Council and other co- in the twenty-first century—a trans- velopment—can transform this once- operative arrangements of the Arctic formation that will have global im- remote area into a new region of im- states and those of the regional and pacts. Temperatures in the Arctic are portance to the global economy. To local governments. rising at unprecedented rates and evaluate the potential impacts of • Overall geopolitical issues fac- are likely to continue increasing such rapid changes, we turn to the ing the region, such as the Law of throughout the century.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of the Thermal Energy Exchange on the South Polar Snow Field and Arctic Ice Pack'
    MAY 1961 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW 173 SOME ASPECTS OF THE THERMAL ENERGY EXCHANGE ON THE SOUTH POLAR SNOW FIELD AND ARCTIC ICE PACK' KIRBY J. HANSON Po!ar Meteorology Research Project, US. Weather Bureau, Washington, D.C. [Manuscript received September 13, 1960; revised February 21, 1961 ] ABSTRACT Solar and terrestrial radiation measurements that were obtained at Amundsen-Scot>t (South Pole) Station and on Ice lsland (Bravo) T-3 are presented for representative summer and winter months. Of the South Polar net radiation loss during April 1958, approximately20 percent of the energy came from the snow and80 percent from the air. The actual atmospheric cooling rate during that period was only about lj6 of the suggested radiative cooling rate. The annual net radiation at various places in Antarctica is presented. During 1058, the South Polar atmos- phere transmitted about 73 percent of the annual extraterrestrial radiation, while at T-3 the Arctic atmosphere transmitted about 56 percent. The albedo of melting sea ice is discussed. Measurements on T-3 during July 1958 indicate that the net radiation is positive on both clear and overcast days but greatest on overcast days. Refreezing of the surface with clear skies, as observed by Untersteiner and Badglep, is discussed. 1. INTRODUCTION Ocean.ThisIsland wasabout by 5 11 miles in size and The elliptical orbit of the earthbrings it about 3 million about 52 meters thick (Crary et al. [2]) in 1953 when it miles farther from the sun at aphelion than at perihelion; drifted near 88' N., looo W. In the years that followed, consequently,during midsummer, about 7 percent less this it drifted southward and in July 1958 was located solar radiation impinges on the top of the Arctic atrnos- 79.5' N., 118' W.
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactivity in the Arctic Seas
    IAEA-TECDOC-1075 XA9949696 Radioactivity in the Arctic Seas Report for the International Arctic Seas Assessment Project (IASAP) ffl INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCA / Y / 1JrrziZr^AA 30-16 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Radiometrics Section International Atomic Energy Agency Marine Environment Laboratory B.P. 800 MC 98012 Monaco Cedex RADIOACTIVITY IN THE ARCTIC SEAS IAEA, VIENNA, 1999 IAEA-TECDOC-1075 ISSN 1011-4289 ©IAEA, 1999 Printe IAEe th AustriAn y i d b a April 1999 FOREWORD From 199 o 1993t e Internationa6th l Atomic Energy Agency's Marine Environment Laboratory (IAEA-MEL s engage IAEA'e wa ) th n di s International Arctic Seas Assessment Project (IASAP whicn i ) h emphasi bees ha sn place criticaa n do l revie f environmentawo l conditions in the Arctic Seas. IAEA-MEe Th L programme, organize framewore th n dIASAi e th f ko P included: (i) an oceanographic and an ecological description of the Arctic Seas; provisioe th (ii )centra a f no l database facilitIASAe th r yfo P programm collectione th r efo , synthesi interpretatiod san datf nmarino n ao e radioactivit Arctie th n yi c Seas; (iii) participation in official expeditions to the Kara Sea organized by the joint Russian- Norwegian Experts Group (1992, 1993 and 1994), the Russian Academy of Sciences (1994), and the Naval Research Laboratory and Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (1995); (iv) assistance wit d n laboratorsiti han u y based radiometric measurement f curreno s t radionuclide concentrations in the Kara Sea; (v) organization of analytical quality assurance intercalibration exercises among the participating laboratories; (vi) computer modellin e potentiath f o g l dispersa f radionuclideo l s released froe mth dumped f assessmeno wast d associatee ean th f o t d radiological consequencee th f o s disposals on local, regional and global scales; (vii) in situ and laboratory based assessment of distribution coefficients (Kd) and concentration factor sArctie (CFth r c)fo environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Marine Aviation Transportation
    SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Response CapacityandSustainableDevelopment Arctic Transportation Infrastructure: Transportation Arctic 3-6 December 2012 | Reykjavik, Iceland 3-6 December2012|Reykjavik, Prepared for the Sustainable Development Working Group Prepared fortheSustainableDevelopment Working By InstituteoftheNorth,Anchorage, Alaska,USA PROCEEDINGS: 20 Decem B er 2012 ICElANDIC coast GuARD INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgments ......................................................................... 6 Abbreviations and Acronyms .......................................................... 7 Executive Summary ....................................................................... 8 Chapters—Workshop Proceedings................................................. 10 1. Current infrastructure and response 2. Current and future activity 3. Infrastructure and investment 4. Infrastructure and sustainable development 5. Conclusions: What’s next? Appendices ................................................................................ 21 A. Arctic vignettes—innovative best practices B. Case studies—showcasing Arctic infrastructure C. Workshop materials 1) Workshop agenda 2) Workshop participants 3) Project-related terminology 4) List of data points and definitions 5) List of Arctic marine and aviation infrastructure AlASkA DepartmENT OF ENvIRONmental
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 10/01/21 10:31 PM UTC 874 JOURNAL of CLIMATE VOLUME 12
    MARCH 1999 VAVRUS 873 The Response of the Coupled Arctic Sea Ice±Atmosphere System to Orbital Forcing and Ice Motion at 6 kyr and 115 kyr BP STEPHEN J. VAVRUS Center for Climatic Research, Institute for Environmental Studies, University of WisconsinÐMadison, Madison, Wisconsin (Manuscript received 2 February 1998, in ®nal form 11 May 1998) ABSTRACT A coupled atmosphere±mixed layer ocean GCM (GENESIS2) is forced with altered orbital boundary conditions for paleoclimates warmer than modern (6 kyr BP) and colder than modern (115 kyr BP) in the high-latitude Northern Hemisphere. A pair of experiments is run for each paleoclimate, one with sea-ice dynamics and one without, to determine the climatic effect of ice motion and to estimate the climatic changes at these times. At 6 kyr BP the central Arctic ice pack thins by about 0.5 m and the atmosphere warms by 0.7 K in the experiment with dynamic ice. At 115 kyr BP the central Arctic sea ice in the dynamical version thickens by 2±3 m, accompanied bya2Kcooling. The magnitude of these mean-annual simulated changes is smaller than that implied by paleoenvironmental evidence, suggesting that changes in other earth system components are needed to produce realistic simulations. Contrary to previous simulations without atmospheric feedbacks, the sign of the dynamic sea-ice feedback is complicated and depends on the region, the climatic variable, and the sign of the forcing perturbation. Within the central Arctic, sea-ice motion signi®cantly reduces the amount of ice thickening at 115 kyr BP and thinning at 6 kyr BP, thus serving as a strong negative feedback in both pairs of simulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator Guide
    E DUCATOR GUIDE This guide, and its contents, are Copyrighted and are the sole Intellectual Property of Science North. E DUCATOR GUIDE The Arctic has always been a place of mystery, myth and fascination. The Inuit and their predecessors adapted and thrived for thousands of years in what is arguably the harshest environment on earth. Today, the Arctic is the focus of intense research. Instead of seeking to conquer the north, scientist pioneers are searching for answers to some troubling questions about the impacts of human activities around the world on this fragile and largely uninhabited frontier. The giant screen film, Wonders of the Arctic, centers on our ongoing mission to explore and come to terms with the Arctic, and the compelling stories of our many forays into this captivating place will be interwoven to create a unifying message about the state of the Arctic today. Underlying all these tales is the crucial role that ice plays in the northern environment and the changes that are quickly overtaking the people and animals who have adapted to this land of ice and snow. This Education Guide to the Wonders of the Arctic film is a tool for educators to explore the many fascinating aspects of the Arctic. This guide provides background information on Arctic geography, wildlife and the ice, descriptions of participatory activities, as well as references and other resources. The guide may be used to prepare the students for the film, as a follow up to the viewing, or to simply stimulate exploration of themes not covered within the film.
    [Show full text]
  • Nalunaq Gold Project
    Kirkespirdalen, August 2019. Nalunaq A/S Nalunaq Gold Project Scoping and Terms of Reference for the Environmental Impact Assessment for the Nalunaq Project 2020 01-12-2020 Nalunaq A/S Nalunaq Gold Project Scoping and Terms of Reference for the Environmental Impact Assessment for the Nalunaq Project 2020 Client Nalunaq A/S C/O Nuna Advokater ApS Qullierfik 2.6 3900 Nuuk Greenland Consultancy Orbicon - WSP Linnés Allé 2 DK-2630 Taastrup Proje ct number 3621800216 Do cument ID Nalunaq Gold Project – Scoping and Terms of Reference 2020 Prepared by Erik Mandrup Jacobsen & Morten Christensen Proje ct Manager Morten Christensen Quality assurance Morten Christensen Approved by Søren Hinge-Christensen Version 04 Published 1st of December 2020 Nalunaq Gold Project – Scoping and Terms of References 2020 Table of contents 1. Introduction 2 2. The EIA Process for Mine Projects in Greenland 4 3. Project Description 6 4. The Study Area 27 4.1 Location 27 4.2 Climate 27 4.3 Local use 29 4.4 Environment 31 4.4.1 Terrestrial Environment 31 4.4.2 Other observations 33 4.5 Marine environment 34 4.6 Baseline monitoring 39 5. Environmental Impact Issues of Concern 41 6. Terms of Reference for the EIA 42 6.1 Proposed additional impact assessment studies 42 7. References 45 8. Annex 1 46 Nalunaq Gold Project – Scoping and Terms of References 2020 List of Abbreviations CPR Competent Person Report DCE Danish Centre for Environment and Energy DTS Dry Tailings Storage DTSF Dry Tailings Stacking Facility EAMRA Environmental Agency for Mineral Resources Activities EIA Environmental Impact Assessment LOM Life-Of-Mine MLSA Mutual Logistic Support Agreement MRA Mineral Resources Authority ROM Run-of-Mine SIA Social Impact Assessment SRK SRK Exploration Services Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • FI/18 Andersen-Et-Al.-2017-Walrus-Geneticspechora
    Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2017, XX, 1–19. With 6 figures. Walruses (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) in the Pechora Sea in the context of contemporary population structure of Northeast Atlantic walruses LISELOTTE WESLEY ANDERSEN1*, MAGNUS W. JACOBSEN1, CHRISTIAN LYDERSEN2, VARVARA SEMENOVA3, ANDREI BOLTUNOV3, ERIK W. BORN4, ØYSTEIN WIIG5 and KIT M. KOVACS2 1Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Grenåvej 14, 8410 Rønde, Aarhus, Denmark 2Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Postbox 6606 Langnes, N-9296 Norway 3Marine Mammal Council, Nakhimovskiy ave. 36, 117218 Moscow, Russia 4Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Box 570, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland 5Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway Received 23 May 2017; revised 4 July 2017; accepted for publication 5 July 2017 Identifying genetically different groups of animals, occupying specific geographical areas, is a prerequisite for con- servation and management priorities. In the present study, the genetic structure of Atlantic walruses (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) occupying the Pechora Sea (PEC) in the western Russian Arctic, including walruses from Svalbard–Franz Josef Land (SVA–FJL) and East Greenland (EGR) regions, was investigated using 14 microsatellites (N = 159) and mtDNA sequences (N = 212). Bayesian-based clustering analysis identified two clusters: EGR and the other Northeast Atlantic areas. Pairwise FST analyses based on microsatellites revealed low but significant genetic differences between walruses from the PEC and SVA–FJL groups, which was supported by mtDNA analysis. FST was not significant for all sampling years, indicating a temporal effect or male-biased gene flow. Extended Bayesian Skyline Plots suggested a constant female subpopulation size (Nef) for EGR and an increase for the SVA–FJL and PEC groups that commenced around 40–30 Kyr ago, indicating different demographic histories for walruses in the EGR.
    [Show full text]