DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a Bibliographic Database – from Procite

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a Bibliographic Database – from Procite APPENDIX A BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE – FROM PROCITE Reference List 1. Alaska Department of Natural Resources: Division of Oil and Gas. Chapter Six: Specific Issues Relating to Oil and Gas Exploration, Development, Production and Transportation. Final Findings of the Director, Oil and Gas Lease Sale 87, North Slope Areawide. 1998 p. 6-5. 2. Alpha, T. R. and E, Reimnitz. Arctic Delta Processes-US Geol. Surv. 1995; Open File Report 95-843. 3. Antonov, V. S.; Ivanov, M. V., and Nalimov, Yu. V. Types of Breakup of Rivers in Siberian Arctic and Sub-Arctic Zones. The Role of Snow and Ice in Hydrology: International Association Scientific Hydrology Publications; 1972: 541-545. Notes: Proceedings of the Banff Symposia 4. ARCOP. Arctic Offshore Pipeline Design and Installation Challenges [Web Page]. 2004; Accessed 2007 Jun 13. Available at: http://www.arcop.fi/workshops/workshop4day1_4.pdf . Notes: Power Point presentation 5. Arctic Coastal Dynamics. Report of the 3rd International Workshop. Rachold, V.; Brown, J.; Solomon, S., and Sollid, J. L., Editors. University of Oslo; Oslo, Norway; 2002 Dec. 6. Arnborg, L.; Walker, H. J., and Peippo, J. Water Discharge in the Colville River, 1962. Geografiska Annaler. Series A, Physical Geography. 1966; 48(4):195-210. 7. Ashford, R. A. The Effect of Strudel Scour and Ice Gouging on the Buried Pipelines in the Beaufort Sea . Sohio Construction Company, Offshore Engineering Group. San Francisco, CA; 1982; Report #SCC-OEG-R.82.4. 8. Ashton, G. D. River and Lake Ice Engineering: Water Resources Publications; 1986; pp. 318-359. ISBN: 0-918334-59-4. 9. Atwater, S. G. 1989 Endicott Environmental Monitoring Program Final Report: Ice Break-up and Freeze-up. 1991. Notes: Prepared by SAIC for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Anchorage AK 10. Baker Michael Jr. Inc. 1998 Spring Break-up and Hydrologic Assessment, Colville River Delta, North Slope Alaska. Anchorage, AK; 1998. Notes: Prepared for Arco Alaska Inc. 11. Baker Michael Jr. Inc. 1999 Spring Break-up and Hydrologic Assessment, Colville River Delta, North Slope Alaska. Anchorage, AK; 1999. Notes: Prepared for Arco Alaska Inc. 12. Baker Michael Jr. Inc. 2000 Spring Break-up and Hydrologic Assessment- Fjord Channel, Colville River Delta, Alaska. Anchorage, AK; 2001a 14 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for Phillips Alaska Inc. 13. Baker Michael Jr. Inc. 2000 Spring Break-up and Hydrologic Assessment- Nechelik Channel, Colville River Delta, Alaska. Anchorage, AK; 2001b 8 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for Phillips Alaska Inc. 14. Bareiss, J.; Eicken, H.; Helbig, A., and Martin, T. Impact of River Discharge and Regional Climatology on the Decay of Sea Ice during Spring and Early Summer. Arctic and Alpine Research. 1999; 31:214-229. 1 15. Barnes, P. W. and Reimnitz, E. Flooding of Sea Ice by Rivers of Northern Alaska. ETRS 1: A New Window on Our Planet. Richards, S. and Carter, W., editor. Menlo Park, CA; 1976 pp. 356-359. Notes: Geological Survey Professional Paper 929 16. Barnes, P. W. and Reimnitz, E. Studies of the Inner Shelf and Coastal Sedimentation Environment of the Beaufort Sea from ERTS-1 (ERTS-1 imagery of inner shelf and coastal sedimentation environment of Beaufort Sea). 1973; E73 - 10492. 17. Barnes, P. W.; Reimnitz, E.; Hunter, R., and Phillips, L. Geologic Processes and Hazards of the Beaufort and Chukchi Sea Shelf and Coastal Region. 1982; BLMINOAA - OCSEAP. 12 pp. 18. Barnes, P. W. and Schell, D. M. The Alaskan Beaufort Sea-Ecosystems and Environments. Reimnitz, E., Editor. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1984. 466 pp. 19. Barry, R.; Moritz, R., and J. Rogers. Studies of the Climate and Fast Ice Interaction During the Decay Season Along the Alaskan Beaufort Sea Coast. Proceedings of the 27th Alaska Science Convention; Fairbanks, AK. 1976: pp. 213-228. 20. Barry, R. G.; Moritz, R. E., and Rogers, J. C. Fast Ice Regimes of the Beaufort and Chukchi Sea Coasts, Alaska. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 1979; 1:129-152. 21. Bercha Group. Final Report Volume 1: Alternative Oil Spill Occurence Estimators and their Variability for the Beaufort Sea - Fault Tree Method. Calgary, Alberta; 2006; OCS Study MMS 2005-061. 22. Blanchet, D.; Cox, G.; Leidersdorf, C. B., and Cornell, A. Analysis of Strudel Scours and Ice Gouges for the Liberty Development Pipeline. Houston, TX; 2000 138 pp. + appen. 23. Carlson, R. F. Effects of Seasonability and Variability of Streamflow on Nearshore Coastal Areas. Environmental Assessment of the Alaskan Continental Shelf. 1977; 14. 24. Carmack, E. C. and MacDonald, R. W. Oceanography of the Canadian Shelf of the Beaufort Sea: A Setting for Marine Life. Arctic. 2002; 55(1):29-45. 25. Chezhian, M., Senior Engineer at Det Norske Veritas. Strudel Scour in Beaufort Sea. Notes: A powerpoint presentation describing the fundamentals of strudel scours 26. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Climactic Data Pertaining to River Overflood and Strudel Drainage in the Liberty Development Project Area. 1999 Aug 26. Notes: Memorandum prepared for BPXA 27. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Liberty Development 1997 Pipeline Route Survey. Chatsworth, CA; 1998. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 28. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Liberty Development 1998 Pipeline Route Survey. Chatsworth, CA; 1999. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 29. ---. Liberty Development River Overflood Reconnaissance. 2003 Jul 18. Notes: Memorandum prepared for BPXA 30. Liberty Development Strudel Drainage Feature and Overflood Limit Comparison Map. Coastal Frontiers Corporation, cartographer. 2000. Notes: File # Bs14336a.dgn Prepared for BPXA 2 31. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development 1996 Pipeline Route Survey. Chatsworth, CA; 1997 72 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 32. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development 1997 Pipeline Route Survey. Chatsworth, CA; 1998 56 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 33. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development 1998 Pipeline Route Survey. Chatsworth, CA; 1999 56 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 34. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development 1999 Pipeline Route Survey. Chatsworth, CA; 2000 26 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 35. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development 2000 Pipeline Route Monitoring Program. Chatsworth, CA; 2001 48 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 36. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development 2001 Pipeline Route Monitoring Program. Chatsworth, CA; 2002 45 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 37. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development 2002 Pipeline Route Monitoring Program. Chatsworth, CA; 2003 55 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 38. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development 2003 Pipeline Route Monitoring Program. Chatsworth, CA; 2004 49 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 39. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development 2004 Pipeline Route Monitoring Program. Chatsworth, CA; 2005 51 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 40. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development 2005 Pipeline Route Monitoring Program. Chatsworth, CA; 2006 51 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 41. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development 2006 Pipeline Route Monitoring Program. Chatsworth, CA; 2007 62 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 42. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Northstar Development Preliminary Pipeline Route Survey, August 1995. Chatsworth, CA; 1996 47 pp. + appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 43. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Oooguruk 2005 Bathymetric Survey Program. 2006 Chatsworth, CA. Notes: Prepared for Pioneer Natural Resources Alaska, Inc. 44. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Oooguruk Development 2006 Bathymetric Survey Program. 2007 May Chatsworth, CA. Notes: Prepared for Pioneer Natural Resources Alaska, Inc. 3 45. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Point Thomson Region 1998 Bathymetric Reconniassance Study Final Report. 1999 Chatsworth, CA. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 46. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Resolution Island 1995 Inspection Program. Chatsworth, CA; 1996. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 47. Coastal Frontiers Corporation. Sivulliq Development 2006 Nearshore Survey Program. 2007 Chatworth, CA. Notes: Prepared for Shell International Exploration and Production Inc. 48. Coastal Frontiers Corporation and LGL Ecological Research Associates. Liberty Development 1997-1998 Boulder Patch Survey. Chatsworth, CA; 1998 46 pp. +appen. Notes: Prepared for BPXA 49. Comfort, G.; Dinovitzer, A, and Lazor, R. Independent Risk Evaluation for the Liberty Pipeline. 2000. Notes: Report submitted by BMT FTL to the United States Minerals Management Service, Report posted on the MMS website, www.mms.gov 50. Dean, K. G.; Stringer, W. J.; Ahlnas, K.; Searcy, C., and Weingartner, T. The Influence of River Discharge on the Thawing of Sea Ice, Mackenzie River Delta: Albedo and Temperature Analyses. Polar Research. 1994; 13(1):83-94. 51. Det Norske Veritas. Free spanning pipelines : Workshop for MMS. Norway: Det Norske Veritas; 2004. 52. Dethleff, D.; Nurnberg, D.; Reimnitz, E.; Saarso, M., and Savchenko, Y. P. East Siberian Arctic Region Expedition '92: the Laptev Sea -- its Significance for Arctic Sea-Ice Formation and Transpolar Sediment Flux. 1993; 1-44. 53. Dickens, D. F. Ice Conditions Affecting Oil Spill Response Planning: Oooguruk Production Facility and Subsea Flowline Prepared for Pioneer Natural Resources Alaska, Inc. Anchorage, AK; 2005b. Notes: Prepared by DF Dickins Associates Ltd. For Polaris Applied Sciences Inc. Bainbridge Island, WA. 54. Dickins Associates, Ltd. Aerial Reconnaissance Survey of Ice Break-up Processes in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zeszyt 10. Morza I Oceany
    Uwaga: Niniejsza publikacja została opracowana według stanu na 2008 rok i nie jest aktualizowana. Zamieszczony na stronie internetowej Komisji Standaryzacji Nazw Geograficznych poza Granica- mi Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej plik PDF jest jedynie zapisem cyfrowym wydrukowanej publikacji. Wykaz zalecanych przez Komisję polskich nazw geograficznych świata (Urzędowy wykaz polskich nazw geograficznych świata), wraz z aktualizowaną na bieżąco listą zmian w tym wykazie, zamieszczo- ny jest na stronie internetowej pod adresem: http://ksng.gugik.gov.pl/wpngs.php. KOMISJA STANDARYZACJI NAZW GEOGRAFICZNYCH POZA GRANICAMI RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ przy Głównym Geodecie Kraju NAZEWNICTWO GEOGRAFICZNE ŚWIATA Zeszyt 10 Morza i oceany GŁÓWNY URZĄD GEODEZJI I KARTOGRAFII Warszawa 2008 KOMISJA STANDARYZACJI NAZW GEOGRAFICZNYCH POZA GRANICAMI RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ przy Głównym Geodecie Kraju Waldemar Rudnicki (przewodniczący), Andrzej Markowski (zastępca przewodniczącego), Maciej Zych (zastępca przewodniczącego), Katarzyna Przyszewska (sekretarz); członkowie: Stanisław Alexandrowicz, Andrzej Czerny, Janusz Danecki, Janusz Gołaski, Romuald Huszcza, Sabina Kacieszczenko, Dariusz Kalisiewicz, Artur Karp, Zbigniew Obidowski, Jerzy Ostrowski, Jarosław Pietrow, Jerzy Pietruszka, Andrzej Pisowicz, Ewa Wolnicz-Pawłowska, Bogusław R. Zagórski Opracowanie Kazimierz Furmańczyk Recenzent Maciej Zych Komitet Redakcyjny Andrzej Czerny, Joanna Januszek, Sabina Kacieszczenko, Dariusz Kalisiewicz, Jerzy Ostrowski, Waldemar Rudnicki, Maciej Zych Redaktor prowadzący Maciej
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactivity in the Arctic Seas
    IAEA-TECDOC-1075 XA9949696 Radioactivity in the Arctic Seas Report for the International Arctic Seas Assessment Project (IASAP) ffl INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCA / Y / 1JrrziZr^AA 30-16 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Radiometrics Section International Atomic Energy Agency Marine Environment Laboratory B.P. 800 MC 98012 Monaco Cedex RADIOACTIVITY IN THE ARCTIC SEAS IAEA, VIENNA, 1999 IAEA-TECDOC-1075 ISSN 1011-4289 ©IAEA, 1999 Printe IAEe th AustriAn y i d b a April 1999 FOREWORD From 199 o 1993t e Internationa6th l Atomic Energy Agency's Marine Environment Laboratory (IAEA-MEL s engage IAEA'e wa ) th n di s International Arctic Seas Assessment Project (IASAP whicn i ) h emphasi bees ha sn place criticaa n do l revie f environmentawo l conditions in the Arctic Seas. IAEA-MEe Th L programme, organize framewore th n dIASAi e th f ko P included: (i) an oceanographic and an ecological description of the Arctic Seas; provisioe th (ii )centra a f no l database facilitIASAe th r yfo P programm collectione th r efo , synthesi interpretatiod san datf nmarino n ao e radioactivit Arctie th n yi c Seas; (iii) participation in official expeditions to the Kara Sea organized by the joint Russian- Norwegian Experts Group (1992, 1993 and 1994), the Russian Academy of Sciences (1994), and the Naval Research Laboratory and Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (1995); (iv) assistance wit d n laboratorsiti han u y based radiometric measurement f curreno s t radionuclide concentrations in the Kara Sea; (v) organization of analytical quality assurance intercalibration exercises among the participating laboratories; (vi) computer modellin e potentiath f o g l dispersa f radionuclideo l s released froe mth dumped f assessmeno wast d associatee ean th f o t d radiological consequencee th f o s disposals on local, regional and global scales; (vii) in situ and laboratory based assessment of distribution coefficients (Kd) and concentration factor sArctie (CFth r c)fo environment.
    [Show full text]
  • FI/18 Andersen-Et-Al.-2017-Walrus-Geneticspechora
    Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2017, XX, 1–19. With 6 figures. Walruses (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) in the Pechora Sea in the context of contemporary population structure of Northeast Atlantic walruses LISELOTTE WESLEY ANDERSEN1*, MAGNUS W. JACOBSEN1, CHRISTIAN LYDERSEN2, VARVARA SEMENOVA3, ANDREI BOLTUNOV3, ERIK W. BORN4, ØYSTEIN WIIG5 and KIT M. KOVACS2 1Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Grenåvej 14, 8410 Rønde, Aarhus, Denmark 2Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Postbox 6606 Langnes, N-9296 Norway 3Marine Mammal Council, Nakhimovskiy ave. 36, 117218 Moscow, Russia 4Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Box 570, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland 5Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway Received 23 May 2017; revised 4 July 2017; accepted for publication 5 July 2017 Identifying genetically different groups of animals, occupying specific geographical areas, is a prerequisite for con- servation and management priorities. In the present study, the genetic structure of Atlantic walruses (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) occupying the Pechora Sea (PEC) in the western Russian Arctic, including walruses from Svalbard–Franz Josef Land (SVA–FJL) and East Greenland (EGR) regions, was investigated using 14 microsatellites (N = 159) and mtDNA sequences (N = 212). Bayesian-based clustering analysis identified two clusters: EGR and the other Northeast Atlantic areas. Pairwise FST analyses based on microsatellites revealed low but significant genetic differences between walruses from the PEC and SVA–FJL groups, which was supported by mtDNA analysis. FST was not significant for all sampling years, indicating a temporal effect or male-biased gene flow. Extended Bayesian Skyline Plots suggested a constant female subpopulation size (Nef) for EGR and an increase for the SVA–FJL and PEC groups that commenced around 40–30 Kyr ago, indicating different demographic histories for walruses in the EGR.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Structure, Tectonics and Petroleum Potential of the Western Sector of the Russian Arctic
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Deep Structure, Tectonics and Petroleum Potential of the Western Sector of the Russian Arctic Alexey S. Egorov 1, Oleg M. Prischepa 2, Yury V. Nefedov 2,* , Vladimir A. Kontorovich 3 and Ilya Y. Vinokurov 4 1 The Faculty of Geology, Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education, Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint-Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 2 Oil and Gas Geology Department, Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education, Saint-Petersburg Mining University, Saint-199106 Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 3 Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Science, The Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; [email protected] 4 Deep Geophysics Department, Russian Geological Research Institute, 199106 Saint-Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-911-230-56-36 Abstract: The evolutionary-genetic method, whereby modern sedimentary basins are interpreted as end-products of a long geological evolution of a system of conjugate palaeo-basins, enables the assessment of the petroleum potential of the Western sector of the Russian Arctic. Modern basins in this region contain relics of palaeo-basins of a certain tectonotype formed in varying geodynamic regimes. Petroleum potential estimates of the Western Arctic vary broadly—from 34.7 to more than 100 billion tons of oil equivalent with the share of liquid hydrocarbons from 5.3 to 13.4 billion tons of oil equivalent. At each stage of the development of palaeo-basins, favourable geological, geochemical and thermobaric conditions have emerged and determined the processes of oil and gas formation, Citation: Egorov, A.S.; Prischepa, migration, accumulation, and subsequent redistribution between different complexes.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea
    FNI Report 7/2008 Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea Constraints and Options for Norwegian Offshore and Shipping Companies Arild Moe and Lars Rowe Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea Constraints and Options for Norwegian Offshore and Shipping Companies Arild Moe and Lars Rowe [email protected] – [email protected] Report commissioned by the Norwegian Shipowners’ Association September 2008 Copyright © Fridtjof Nansen Institute 2008 Title Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea: Constraints and Options for Norwegian Offshore and Shipping Companies Publication Type and Number Pages FNI-Report 7/2008 26 Authors ISBN Arild Moe and Lars Rowe 978-82-7613-530-5-print version 978-82-7613-531-2-electronic version Project ISSN 0879 1504-9744 Abstract Presently most attention in the Barents Sea is given to the Shtokman project. Experience from development of this field, where there are still many uncertainties, will have large consequences for the further development program and relations with foreign companies. The exploration activity going on is fairly limited, but over the last few years there has been a struggle over licenses and control over exploration capacity. In the medium term the goal of rapid development of the Arctic continental shelf has become intertwined with a comprehensive government effort to modernise the domestic shipbuilding industry to make it able to cover most of the needs offshore. With the shipbuilding industry in a deep crisis these goals are not fully reconcilable. Russia will either have to accept more foreign involvement, or scale down its offshore ambitions. We believe a combination of the two alternatives is likely.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining Arctic Cooperation with Russia Planning for Regional Change in the Far North
    Maintaining Arctic Cooperation with Russia Planning for Regional Change in the Far North Stephanie Pezard, Abbie Tingstad, Kristin Van Abel, Scott Stephenson C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1731 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9745-3 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: NASA/Operation Ice Bridge. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Despite a period of generally heightened tensions between Russia and the West, cooperation on Arctic affairs—particularly through the Arctic Council—has remained largely intact, with the exception of direct mil- itary-to-military cooperation in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • North-West Russia As a Gateway in Russian Energy Geopolitics
    North-West Russia as a gateway in Russian energy geopolitics MARKKU TYKKYLÄINEN Tykkyläinen, Markku (2003). North-West Russia as a gateway in Russian ener- gy geopolitics. Fennia 181: 2, pp. 145–177. Helsinki. ISSN 0015-0010. This paper examines Russian energy development and plans and their geopo- litical implications around the turn of the new millennium. Argumentation is founded on the interpretation of the impacts of stakeholders’ interests on geo- politics under new societal conditions and the legacy of past energy produc- tion and logistics. Empirical evidence consists of material from the projects of Russian companies and the plans and politics of the Russian Government for developing the energy sector. The redefined borders and the geographical shifts of energy production have brought about the orientation of Russia’s energy development and interests towards the north. The former empire’s parts bordering on Russia in the west, Belarus and first of all Ukraine, have become problematic due to transit pay- ment conflicts. Consequently, Russian companies develop ports in North-West Russia as well as plan the construction of new oil and gas pipelines through the Baltic Sea Region. On the other hand, the northern location of the infra- structure plans is a geographical necessity, in the way that new oil and gas deposits lie in northern high-latitude zones. Energy stakeholders’ market-ori- ented interests greatly influence the country’s economic orientation to the ad- vanced economies and the global economy. Thus, Russia’s new energy geo- politics means economic integration and networking with partners (compa- nies, nations and economic areas) that are able to co-operate successfully in the economic sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Discharges for 2400 Rivers and Streams of the Former Soviet Union [FSU]
    Annotations for Monthly Discharges for 2400 Rivers and Streams of the former Soviet Union [FSU] v1.1, September, 2001 Byron A. Bodo [email protected] Toronto, Canada Disclaimer Users assume responsibility for errors in the river and stream discharge data, associated metadata [river names, gauge names, drainage areas, & geographic coordinates], and the annotations contained herein. No doubt errors and discrepancies remain in the metadata and discharge records. Anyone data set users who uncover further errors and other discrepancies are invited to report them to NCAR. Acknowledgement Most discharge records in this compilation originated from the State Hydrological Institute [SHI] in St. Petersburg, Russia. Problems with some discharge records and metadata notwithstanding; this compilation could not have been created were it not for the efforts of SHI. The University of New Hampshire’s Global Hydrology Group is credited for making the SHI Arctic Basin data available. Foreword This document was prepared for on-screen viewing, not printing !!! Printed output can be very messy. To ensure wide accessibility, this document was prepared as an MS Word 6 doc file. The www addresses are not active hyperlinks. They have to be copied and pasted into www browsers. Clicking on a page number in the Table of Contents will jump the cursor to the beginning of that section of text [in the MS Word version, not the pdf file]. Distribution Files Files in the distribution package are listed below: Contents File name short abstract abstract.txt ascii description of
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Cod in the Russian Arctic: New Data, with Notes on Intraspecific Forms
    Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology Research Article Open Access Arctic cod in the Russian arctic: new data, with notes on intraspecific forms Abstract Volume 7 Issue 1 - 2018 The Polar cod Boreogadus saida, from Siberian shelf is largely unstudied. Comparative N Chernova results are presented for the Barents, Pechora, Kara, Laptev and East-Siberian seas. Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences (ZIN), Surveys included 325 bottom catches, 234 pelagic and 72 Sigs by trawls at 385 stations. It Universitetskaya Emb, Russia is quantitatively confirmed that B.saida dominates in arctic areas. The maximum length is 29.0cm and age 7+ (Laptev Sea). It prefers temperatures in the range -1.8 to +2.3°C. Polar Correspondence: N Chernova, Zoological Institute of Russian cod is represented by several intraspecific forms differing in proportions of body, size and Academy of Sciences (ZIN), Universitetskaya Emb, Russia, Tel +7 position of fins and in coloration. It remains a mystery in what places the spawning of this 812 328 0612, Fax +7 812 328 2941, Email fish occurs in the Arctic. A hypothesis is proposed thatB.saida spawns in a system of winter quasi stationary polynya which may extend from the White Sea to the Chukchi Sea along Received: December 22, 2017 | Published: January 29, 2018 the edge of fast ice. The local regimes of their functioning create the preconditions for existing of a number of stocks or populations within circumpolar range. Keywords: polar cod: Boreogadussaida, dominant species, arctic, barents sea, kara sea, laptev sea, east-siberian sea, intraspecific forms, polynyas, spawning Introduction EN2, EN3 below), the Laptev Sea (areas O, L, AN) and the East- Siberian Sea (part of the AN area).
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Distribution and Range Structure of Arctic Cephalopods Due to Climatic Changes of the Last Decades A.V
    This article was downloaded by: [A.V. Golikov] On: 03 March 2013, At: 04:50 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Biodiversity Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tbid20 Changes in distribution and range structure of Arctic cephalopods due to climatic changes of the last decades A.V. Golikov a , R.M. Sabirov a , P.A. Lubin b & L.L. Jørgensen c a Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia b Laboratory of Coastal Fisheries, Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography, Murmansk, Russia c Institute of Marine Research, Tromsø, Norway Version of record first published: 24 Sep 2012. To cite this article: A.V. Golikov , R.M. Sabirov , P.A. Lubin & L.L. Jørgensen (2013): Changes in distribution and range structure of Arctic cephalopods due to climatic changes of the last decades, Biodiversity, 14:1, 28-35 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2012.702301 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date.
    [Show full text]
  • EU and Russian Policies on Energy and Climate Change
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A POLICY BRIEFING EU and Russian policies on energy and climate change Abstract EU-Russian energy relations are characterised by mutual interdependence. Within the EU, however, the level of Member States’ dependence on Russia varies largely according to Member States’ abilities to diversify their energy mix and their imports. This has created a fragmented internal energy market, as demonstrated by the wide range in gas prices among Member States. Energy supply diversification has become a key concern for the entire EU, although energy policies are still largely overseen by Member States. While Russia is likely to remain Europe’s principal energy supplier in the medium term, the importance of other crude oil and natural gas exporters, including Azerbaijan and Algeria, is likely to grow. The European Commission supports widening the possible range of sources, particularly given its antitrust investigations against Russian companies, which have exacerbated tensions. The EU and Russia are also divided by their environmental policies, stemming from a different environmental sensibility but also from the different availability of fossil fuels. Fighting against climate change, the EU has committed to reduce its overall greenhouse gas emissions by 20 % by 2020. To fulfil this promise, the EU has relied on the EU Emission Trading System, currently the largest international carbon market. Unlike Europe and its ecological considerations, Moscow has long been driven by more economic and geostrategic factors. Despite Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev’s recent willingness to consider limiting carbon emissions and fostering investments in renewable sources, the country’s refusal to adhere to the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol and its environmentally unfriendly Arctic efforts confirm Moscow’s resistance to integrating climate issues in its policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Background
    ‹ Countries Russia Last Updated: September 18, 2012 full report Background Russia holds the world's largest natural gas reserves, the second-largest coal reserves, and the ninth-largest crude oil reserves. Russia is a major producer and exporter of oil and natural gas and its economy largely depends on energy exports. Russia's economic growth continues to be driven by energy exports given its high oil and gas production and the elevated prices for those commodities. Internally, Russia gets over half of its domestic energy needs from natural gas. Russia was the world's second-largest producer of oil (after Saudi Arabia) and the second- largest producer of natural gas in 2011 (second to the United States). However, preliminary data through June 2012 indicate that Russia had surpassed Saudi Arabia as the top crude oil producer in four out of the six months. Russia's oil and gas sector continues to be affected by high taxes and export duties. While export duties for crude oil and petroleum products were lowered to 60 and 65 percent, respectively, in 2011, producers still face high mineral extraction taxes and a revenue-based tax system. Oil Russia was the second-largest producer of total petroleum liquids in 2011, second only to Saudi Arabia. During the year, production averaged more than 10 million bbl/d. Russia's proven oil reserves were 60 billion barrels as of January 2012, according to the Oil and Gas Journal. Most of Russia's resources are located in Western Siberia, between the Ural Mountains and the Central Siberian Plateau and in the Volga-Urals region, extending into the Caspian Sea.
    [Show full text]