DOCSLIB.ORG

Diverging Lineages in the Ericales

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diverging Lineages in the Ericales Downloaded from rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org on January 15, 2010 Diversity and evolution of floral structure among early diverging lineages in the Ericales Jürg Schönenberger, Maria von Balthazar and Kenneth J. Sytsma Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010 365, 437-448 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0247 Supplementary data "Data Supplement" http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/suppl/2010/01/13/365.1539.437.DC1.htm l References This article cites 64 articles, 10 of which can be accessed free http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1539/437.full.html#ref-list-1 Rapid response Respond to this article http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/letters/submit/royptb;365/1539/437 Subject collections Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections taxonomy and systematics (199 articles) evolution (1357 articles) Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top Email alerting service right-hand corner of the article or click here To subscribe to Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B go to: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions This journal is © 2010 The Royal Society Downloaded from rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org on January 15, 2010 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B (2010) 365, 437–448 doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0247 Diversity and evolution of floral structure among early diverging lineages in the Ericales Ju¨ rg Scho¨nenberger1,*,†, Maria von Balthazar2 and Kenneth J. Sytsma3 1Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Lilla Frescativa¨gen 5, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Palaeobotany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 10405 Stockholm, Sweden 3Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1831, USA This is a combination of review and original data on floral structure and diversity in the two earliest diverging lineages of the Ericales, i.e. the balsaminoids, comprising Balsaminaceae, Marcgraviaceae and Tetrameristaceae, and the polemonioids, comprising Fouquieriaceae and Polemoniaceae. Each clade is strongly supported in molecular studies, while structural synapomorphies have largely been lacking. For the balsaminoid families, we compare floral morphology, anatomy and histology among selected taxa and find that the entire clade is strongly supported by the shared presence of nectar- iferous tissue in the floral periphery, thread-like structures on anthers, truncate stigmas, secretion in the ovary, as well as mucilage cells, raphides and tannins in floral tissues. A possible sister group relationship between Balsaminaceae and Tetrameristaceae is supported by the shared presence of post-genital fusion of filaments and ovary and a star-shaped stylar canal. For polemonioids, we document unexpected diversity of floral features in Polemoniaceae, partly providing structural links to Fouquieriaceae. Features include cochlear and quincuncial corolla aestivation, connective protrusions, ventrifixed anthers and nectariferous tissue in the base of the ovary. In addition, we outline future directions for research on floral structure in the Ericales and briefly discuss the general importance of structural studies for our understanding of plant phylogeny and evolution. Keywords: asterids; Balsaminaceae; floral diversity; Marcgraviaceae; Polemoniaceae; Tetrameristaceae 1. INTRODUCTION (e.g. Cronquist 1981; Dahlgren 1983), many of which The stem node of the Ericales has been estimated to were thought to be distantly related (table 1). Only have its origin in the Mid-Early Cretaceous (Bremer the more recent rise of molecular phylogenetics made et al.2004), and the first major diversification, which possible our current understanding of the evolutionary gave rise to all major lineages of the order, probably history of the Ericales. Molecular studies have not took place 109–103 Myr ago (Sytsma et al.2006). By only demonstrated the monophyly of the order (Soltis the Early Eocene, i.e. ca 50 Myr ago, almost all extant et al. 2000; Albach et al.2001b), but also resolved the families had already diverged (Bremer et al.2004). Ericales as sister to the euasterids (figure 1; Bremer Today, Ericales comprise ca 6 per cent of the eudicot et al.2002). Within the order, families are generally species diversity (Magallo´n et al.1999) and include easily recognized based on morphological features and many well-known tropical as well as temperate groups. are mostly well supported in molecular studies. It has, In many tropical rainforests, they are an important however, proved difficult to disentangle interfamilial component of the understorey vegetation (ca 10% of relationships as most of the deeper nodes in the erica- the total species diversity; Davis et al.2005). They lean phylogeny remained unresolved or only weakly include ca 11 000 species in 347 genera and 25 families supported (Anderberg et al. 2002; Geuten et al. (Stevens 2001). In pre-molecular classification 2004). However, with the addition of more sequence systems, members of Ericales were usually assigned to data and a denser taxon sampling, subsequent studies between 10 and 12 different angiosperm orders have managed to improve resolution also at deeper levels in the ericalean tree (Scho¨nenberger et al. 2005; Sytsma et al. 2006). * Author for correspondence ([email protected]). † Present address: Department of Palynology and Structural Botany, Why were the Ericales not recognized as a natural Faculty Center of Biodiversity, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, group in the pre-molecular era? Part of the answer 1030 Vienna, Austria. may lie in the considerable age of many of the families Electronic supplementary material is available at http://dx.doi.org/ and the corresponding long time spans of anagenic 10.1098/rstb.2009.0247 or via http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org. stem lineage evolution, which may have obscured One contribution of 16 to a Discussion Meeting Issue ‘Darwin and many structural synapomorphies. Today, members of the evolution of flowers’. the Ericales exhibit a vast diversity at all levels of 437 This journal is q 2010 The Royal Society Downloaded from rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org on January 15, 2010 438 J. Scho¨nenberger et al. Ericales: floral diversity and evolution Table 1. Currently recognized families of Ericales (Stevens 2001; APG 2003) and pre-molecular, ordinal classifications remaining according to Cronquist (1981) and Dahlgren (1983). Ericales Subclass abbreviations: A, Asteridae; C, Corniflorae; D, Dilleniidae; M, Magnoliflorae; P, Primuliflorae; R, Rosidae; Ru, Rutiflorae; S, Solaniflorae; T, Theiflorae. Polemoniaceae ordinal classification of earlier Ericales Fouquieriaceae family names (no. authors of genera/species Marcgraviaceae according to Cronquist Stevens 2001) (1981) Dahlgren (1983) Tetrameristaceae Actinidiaceae Theales (D) Ericales (C) (3/355) Balsaminaceae Balsaminaceae Geraniales (R) Balsaminales asterids (2/1001) (Ru) euasterids Clethraceae (2/75) Ericales (D) Ericales (C) Cyrillaceae (2/2) Ericales (D) Ericales (C) Diapensiaceae Diapensiales (D) Ericales (C) Cornales (6/18) Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of Ericales and its two Ebenaceae (4/548) Ebenales (D) Ebenales (P) first diverging subclades; tree topology is based on Bremer Ericaceae Ericales (D) Ericales (C) et al. (2002), Scho¨nenberger et al. (2005) and Sytsma et al. (126/3395) (2006). Fouquieriaceae Violales (D) Fouquieriales (C) (1/11) Lecythidaceae Lecythidales (D) Theales (T) For instance, in his groundbreaking book The different (25/310) forms of flowers on plants and the same species (Darwin Maesaceae (1/150) Primulales (D) Primulales (P) Marcgraviaceae Theales (D) Theales (T) 1877), he collected a mass of data from morphological (7/130) observations and pollination experiments about Mitrastemonaceae Rafflesiales (R) Rafflesiales (M) phenomena such as heterostyly and cleistogamy. An (1/2) important part of his data is based on the study of eri- Myrsinaceae Primulales (D) Primulales (P) calean taxa including various representatives from (41/1435) Primulaceae, Polemoniaceae and Balsaminaceae. Pentaphylacaceae Theales (D) Theales (T) At present, there are no clear-cut non-molecular (14/340) synapomorphies neither for the order as a whole, nor Polemoniaceae Solanales (A) Solanales (S) for most of the major ericalean clades spanning more (18/385) than one family. The only feature shared by all taxa Primulaceae (9/900) Primulales (D) Primulales (P) is tenuinucellate ovules, but this is a characteristic of Roridulaceae (1/2) Rosales (R) Ericales (C) Sapotaceae Ebenales (D) Ebenales (P) most asterids (Albach et al. 2001a). One important (53/1100) reason for our inability to describe synapomorphies Sarraceniaceae Nepenthales (D) Sarraceniales (C) for larger clades within the Ericales, and, for that (3/15) matter, for many other large angiosperm clades, is Styracaceae Ebenales (D) Ebenales (P) that our current knowledge of the floral structure (11/160) and diversity of most families is highly fragmentary. Symplocaceae Ebenales (D) Cornales (C) In recent years, comparative structural analyses have (2/320) not kept pace with the ever faster evolving methods Tetrameristaceae Theales (D) Theales (T) for acquiring and analysing molecular sequence data, (3/5) and it is therefore currently difficult to test sequence- Theaceae (7/195) Theales (D) Theales (T) Theophrastaceae Primulales (D) Primulales (P) based phylogenetic hypothesis and to conduct (5/105) combined morphological/molecular analyses. This situation has been recognized as a fundamental pro- blem in angiosperm phylogenetics (Crane et al. their biology, including,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomo Kahni State Historic Park Tour Notes – Flora
    Tomo Kahni State Historic Park Tour Notes – Flora Version 3.0 April 2019 Compiled by: Georgette Theotig Cynthia Waldman Tech Support: Jeanne Hamrick Plant List by Color - 1 Page Common Name Genus/Species Family Kawaisuu Name White Flowers 6 White Fiesta Flower Pholistoma membranaceum Borage (Boraginaceae) kaawanavi 6 Seaside Heliotrope Heliotropium curassavicum Borage (Boraginaceae) 6 California Manroot Marah fabacea Cucumber (Cucurbitaceae) parivibi 7 Stinging Nettles Urtica dioica Goosefoot (Urticaceae) kwichizi ataa (Bad Plate) 7 White Whorl Lupine Lupinus microcarpus var. densiflorus Legume/Pea (Fabaceae) 7 Mariposa Lily (white) Calochortus venustus Lily (Liliaceae) 7 Mariposa Lily (pinkish-white) Calochortus invenustus Lily (Liliaceae) 8 Wild Tobacco Nicotiana quadrivalvis Nightshade (Solanaceae) Soo n di 8 Wild Celery Apium graveolens Parsley (Umbelliferae) n/a Bigelow’s Linanthus Linanthus bigelovii Phlox (Polemoniaceae) 8 Linanthus Phlox Phlox (Polemoniaceae) 8 Evening Snow Linanthus dichotomus Phlox (Polemoniaceae) tutuvinivi 9 Miner’s Lettuce Claytonia perfoliata Miner’s Lettuce (Montiaceae) Uutuk a ribi 9 Thyme-leaf Spurge (aka Thyme-leaf Sandmat) Euphorbia serpyllifolia Spurge (Euphorbiaceae) tivi kagivi 9 Pale Yellow Layia Layia heterotricha Sunflower (Asteraceae) 9 Tidy Tips Layia glandulosa Sunflower (Asteraceae) April 8, 2019 Tomo Kahni Flora – Tour Notes Page 1 Plant List by Color – 2 Page Common Name Genus/Species Family Kawaisuu Name Yellow Flowers 10 Fiddleneck Amsinckia tessellata Borage (Boraginaceae) tiva nibi 10
    [Show full text]
  • © 2020 Theodore Payne Foundation for Wild Flowers & Native Plants. No
    May 8, 2020 Theodore Payne Foundation’s Wild Flower Hotline is made possible by donations, memberships and sponsors. You can support TPF by shopping the online gift store as well. A new, pay by phone, contactless plant pickup system is now available. Details here. Widespread closures remain in place. If you find an accessible trail, please practice social distancing. The purpose for the Wild Flower Hotline now is NOT to send you to localities for wild flower viewing, but to post photos that assure you—virtually—that California’s wild spaces are still open for business for flowers and their pollinators. LA County’s Wildlife Sanctuaries are starting to dry up from the heat. This may be the last week to see flowers at Jackrabbit Flats and Theodore Payne Wildlife Sanctuaries near Littlerock in the high desert. Yellow is the dominant color with some pink and white scattered about. Parry’s linanthus (Linanthus parryae) and Bigelow’s coreopsis (Leptosyne bigelovii), are widespread. Small patches of goldfields (Lasthenia californica), and Mojave sun cups (Camissonia campestris) are still around. If you are visiting around dusk, the evening snow (Linanthus dichotomus) open up and put on a display that lives up to its name. Strewn around are Pringle’s woolly sunflower (Eriophyllum pringlei), white tidy tips (Layia glandulosa), owl’s clover (Castilleja sp.) and desert dandelion (Malacothrix glabrata). Underneath the creosote bushes, lacy phacelia (Phacelia tanacetifolia) is seeking out some shade. Theodore Payne Sanctuary has all these flowers, and because it has more patches of sandy alluvial soils, has some cute little belly flowers like Wallace’s wooly daisy (Eriophyllum wallacei) and purple mat (Nama demissa) too.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Lições Das Interações Planta – Beija-Flor
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGIA JÉFERSON BUGONI REDES PLANTA-POLINIZADOR NOS TRÓPICOS: LIÇÕES DAS INTERAÇÕES PLANTA – BEIJA-FLOR PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS IN THE TROPICS: LESSONS FROM HUMMINGBIRD-PLANT INTERACTIONS CAMPINAS 2017 JÉFERSON BUGONI REDES PLANTA-POLINIZADOR NOS TRÓPICOS: LIÇÕES DAS INTERAÇÕES PLANTA – BEIJA-FLOR PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS IN THE TROPICS: LESSONS FROM HUMMINGBIRD-PLANT INTERACTIONS Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas como parte dos requisitos exigidos para a obtenção do Título de Doutor em Ecologia. Thesis presented to the Institute of Biology of the University of Campinas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Ecology. ESTE ARQUIVO DIGITAL CORRESPONDE À VERSÃO FINAL DA TESE DEFENDIDA PELO ALUNO JÉFERSON BUGONI E ORIENTADA PELA DRA. MARLIES SAZIMA. Orientadora: MARLIES SAZIMA Co-Orientador: BO DALSGAARD CAMPINAS 2017 Campinas, 17 de fevereiro de 2017. COMISSÃO EXAMINADORA Profa. Dra. Marlies Sazima Prof. Dr. Felipe Wanderley Amorim Prof. Dr. Thomas Michael Lewinsohn Profa. Dra. Marina Wolowski Torres Prof. Dr. Vinícius Lourenço Garcia de Brito Os membros da Comissão Examinadora acima assinaram a Ata de Defesa, que se encontra no processo de vida acadêmica do aluno. DEDICATÓRIA À minha família por me ensinar o amor à natureza e a natureza do amor. Ao povo brasileiro por financiar meus estudos desde sempre, fomentando assim meus sonhos. EPÍGRAFE “Understanding patterns in terms of the processes that produce them is the essence of science […]” Levin, S.A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967. AGRADECIMENTOS Manifestar a gratidão às tantas pessoas que fizeram parte direta ou indiretamente do processo que culmina nesta tese não é tarefa trivial.
    [Show full text]
  • Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice
    Steele/Burnand Anza-Borrego Desert Research Center University of California, Irvine UCI – NATURE and UC Natural Reserve System California State Parks – Colorado Desert District Anza-Borrego Desert State Park & Anza-Borrego Foundation Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice (revised 1/31/2019) A gaggle of geneticists in Borrego Palm Canyon – 1975. (L-R, Dr. Theodosius Dobzhansky, Dr. Steve Bryant, Dr. Richard Lewontin, Dr. Steve Jones, Dr. TimEDITOR’S Prout. Photo NOTE by Dr. John Moore, courtesy of Steve Jones) Editor’s Note The publications cited in this volume specifically mention and/or discuss Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, locations and/or features known to occur within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, biological, geological, paleontological or anthropological specimens collected from localities within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, or events that have occurred within those same boundaries. This compendium is not now, nor will it ever be complete (barring, of course, the end of the Earth or the Park). Many, many people have helped to corral the references contained herein (see below). Any errors of omission and comission are the fault of the editor – who would be grateful to have such errors and omissions pointed out! [[email protected]] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As mentioned above, many many people have contributed to building this database of knowledge about Anza-Borrego Desert State Park. A quantum leap was taken somewhere in 2016-17 when Kevin Browne introduced me to Google Scholar – and we were off to the races. Elaine Tulving deserves a special mention for her assistance in dealing with formatting issues, keeping printers working, filing hard copies, ignoring occasional foul language – occasionally falling prey to it herself, and occasionally livening things up with an exclamation of “oh come on now, you just made that word up!” Bob Theriault assisted in many ways and now has a lifetime job, if he wants it, entering these references into Zotero.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary History of Floral Key Innovations in Angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes
    Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes To cite this version: Elisabeth Reyes. Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms. Botanics. Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), 2016. English. NNT : 2016SACLS489. tel-01443353 HAL Id: tel-01443353 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01443353 Submitted on 23 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. NNT : 2016SACLS489 THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY, préparée à l’Université Paris-Sud ÉCOLE DOCTORALE N° 567 Sciences du Végétal : du Gène à l’Ecosystème Spécialité de Doctorat : Biologie Par Mme Elisabeth Reyes Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Thèse présentée et soutenue à Orsay, le 13 décembre 2016 : Composition du Jury : M. Ronse de Craene, Louis Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux d’Édimbourg M. Forest, Félix Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux de Kew Mme. Damerval, Catherine Directrice de recherche au Moulon Président du jury M. Lowry, Porter Curateur en chef aux Jardins Examinateur Botaniques du Missouri M. Haevermans, Thomas Maître de conférences au MNHN Examinateur Mme. Nadot, Sophie Professeur à l’Université Paris-Sud Directeur de thèse M.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships in the Order Ericales S.L.: Analyses of Molecular Data from Five Genes from the Plastid and Mitochondrial Genomes1
    American Journal of Botany 89(4): 677±687. 2002. PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS IN THE ORDER ERICALES S.L.: ANALYSES OF MOLECULAR DATA FROM FIVE GENES FROM THE PLASTID AND MITOCHONDRIAL GENOMES1 ARNE A. ANDERBERG,2,5 CATARINA RYDIN,3 AND MARI KAÈ LLERSJOÈ 4 2Department of Phanerogamic Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; 3Department of Systematic Botany, University of Stockholm, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; and 4Laboratory for Molecular Systematics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Phylogenetic interrelationships in the enlarged order Ericales were investigated by jackknife analysis of a combination of DNA sequences from the plastid genes rbcL, ndhF, atpB, and the mitochondrial genes atp1 and matR. Several well-supported groups were identi®ed, but neither a combination of all gene sequences nor any one alone fully resolved the relationships between all major clades in Ericales. All investigated families except Theaceae were found to be monophyletic. Four families, Marcgraviaceae, Balsaminaceae, Pellicieraceae, and Tetrameristaceae form a monophyletic group that is the sister of the remaining families. On the next higher level, Fouquieriaceae and Polemoniaceae form a clade that is sister to the majority of families that form a group with eight supported clades between which the interrelationships are unresolved: Theaceae-Ternstroemioideae with Ficalhoa, Sladenia, and Pentaphylacaceae; Theaceae-Theoideae; Ebenaceae and Lissocarpaceae; Symplocaceae; Maesaceae, Theophrastaceae, Primulaceae, and Myrsinaceae; Styr- acaceae and Diapensiaceae; Lecythidaceae and Sapotaceae; Actinidiaceae, Roridulaceae, Sarraceniaceae, Clethraceae, Cyrillaceae, and Ericaceae. Key words: atpB; atp1; cladistics; DNA; Ericales; jackknife; matR; ndhF; phylogeny; rbcL. Understanding of phylogenetic relationships among angio- was available for them at the time, viz.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Genome Size Affect the Evolution of Pollen Tube Growth Rate, a Haploid Performance Trait?
    Manuscript bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/462663; this version postedClick April here18, 2019. to The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv aaccess/download;Manuscript;PTGR.genome.evolution.15April20 license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Effects of genome size on pollen performance 2 3 4 5 How does genome size affect the evolution of pollen tube growth rate, a haploid 6 performance trait? 7 8 9 10 11 John B. Reese1,2 and Joseph H. Williams2 12 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 13 37996, U.S.A. 14 15 16 17 1Author for correspondence: 18 John B. Reese 19 Tel: 865 974 9371 20 Email: [email protected] 21 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/462663; this version posted April 18, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 22 ABSTRACT 23 Premise of the Study – Male gametophytes of most seed plants deliver sperm to eggs via a 24 pollen tube. Pollen tube growth rates (PTGRs) of angiosperms are exceptionally rapid, a pattern 25 attributed to more effective haploid selection under stronger pollen competition. Paradoxically, 26 whole genome duplication (WGD) has been common in angiosperms but rare in gymnosperms.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcgraviaceae
    BOTÁNICA-TAXONOMÍA http://www.icn.unal.edu.co/ CaldasiaGiraldo-Cañas 34(1):33-41. & Dressler 2012 TWO NEW TAXA OF MARCGRAVIASTRUM (MARCGRAVIACEAE) AND A CATALOGUE OF COLOMBIAN TAXA OF THIS GENUS1 Dos nuevos taxones de Marcgraviastrum (Marcgraviaceae) y catálogo de las especies colombianas del género DIEGO GIRALDO-CAÑAS Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Apartado 7495, Bogotá, D. C., Colombia. [email protected] STEFAN DRESSLER Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Herbarium, Senckeberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt/Main, Germany. [email protected] ABSTRACT A new species of Marcgraviastrum is validated, described, and illustrated. The new species is known only from the Colombian Guayana (Departments of Caquetá, Guaviare, and Vaupés). Its morphological relationships are discussed. Furthermore, a new combination into Marcgraviastrum is published. A checklist of the nine Colombian species of the genus is presented. Key words. Colombian Flora, Neotropical Flora, Marcgraviaceae, Marcgraviastrum, Norantea. RESUMEN Se valida, describe e ilustra una nueva especie de Marcgraviastrum. La nueva especie sólo se conoce de la Guayana colombiana (departamentos de Caquetá, Guavire y Vaupés). Se discuten sus relaciones morfológicas. Adicionalmente, se publica una nueva combinación en el género Marcgraviastrum. Se incluye el catálogo de las nueve especies del género presentes en Colombia. Palabras clave. Flora neotropical, Flora de Colombia, Marcgraviaceae, Marcgraviastrum, Norantea. INTRODUCTION thesis (1975) but had agreed with Bedell to share authorship of his new findings in the When the U.S. American Hollis Gail Bedell complex genus Norantea and gave his notes presented her comprehensive thesis on the for use in her work. She elevated the subgenera Norantea complex (Marcgraviaceae) in 1985, to generic rank and generated thourough she unfortunately did not validate her new descriptions of all species.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Genome Size Affect the Evolution of Pollen Tube Growth Rate, a Haploid Performance Trait?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/462663; this version posted November 5, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Effects of genome size on pollen performance 2 3 4 5 6 How does genome size affect the evolution of pollen tube growth rate, a haploid 7 performance trait? 8 9 10 11 12 John B. Reese1,2 and Joseph H. Williams1 13 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 14 37996, U.S.A. 15 16 17 18 1Author for correspondence: 19 John B. Reese 20 Tel: 865 974 9371 21 Email: [email protected] 22 23 24 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/462663; this version posted November 5, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 25 ABSTRACT 26 Premise of the Study - Male gametophytes of seed plants deliver sperm to eggs via a pollen 27 tube. Pollen tube growth rate (PTGR) may evolve rapidly due to pollen competition and haploid 28 selection, but many angiosperms are currently polyploid and all have polyploid histories. 29 Polyploidy should initially accelerate PTGR via “genotypic effects” of increased gene dosage 30 and heterozygosity on metabolic rates, but “nucleotypic effects” of genome size on cell size 31 should reduce PTGR.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Biodiversity Report
    FINAL Baseline Biodiversity Survey for Potrero Mason Property Prepared for: County of San Diego Department of Parks and Recreation 5500 Overland Avenue Drive, Suite 410 San Diego, California 92123 Contact: Jennifer Price Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contact: Brock Ortega DECEMBER 2012 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Final Baseline Biodiversity Survey Potrero Mason Property TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of the Report.............................................................................................. 1 1.2 MSCP Context ........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................9 2.1 Project Location ...................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Geographical Setting ............................................................................................... 9 2.3 Geology and Soils ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]