RSPO New Planting Procedure Report PT Lestari Abadi Perkasa Report Number CU-NPP-864817

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RSPO New Planting Procedure Report PT Lestari Abadi Perkasa Report Number CU-NPP-864817 RSPO New Planting Procedure Report PT Lestari Abadi Perkasa Report Number CU-NPP-864817 RSPO New Planting Procedure Assessment Summaries and Management Plans Proposed new planting by PT Lestari Abadi Perkasa in Ketapang Regency, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia 2019 RSPO New Planting Procedure Report PT Lestari Abadi Perkasa Report Number CU-NPP-864817 Table of Contents 1. Overview and background .............................................................................................. 1 2. Assessment process and methods ................................................................................... 5 2.1 Social and Environmental Impact Assessment (SEIA) ............................................................................. 5 2.1.1 Assessment team and their qualification .................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 SEIA method ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 High Conservation Value (HCV) Assessment ........................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Assessment team and their qualification .................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Timeframe .................................................................................................................................. 10 2.2.3 HCV assessment method ........................................................................................................... 12 2.2.3.1 Pre-assessment ................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.3.1.1 Land cover change ....................................................................................................... 12 2.2.3.2 Tier rating ............................................................................................................................ 13 2.2.3.3 Scoping study ...................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3.4 HCV assessment phase – field survey method ................................................................... 13 2.2.3.4.1 Flora and Fauna ........................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3.4.2 Hydrology and environmental services ........................................................................ 14 2.2.3.4.3 Social, economic and culture........................................................................................ 14 2.2.3.5 Potential threat ................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.3.6 The main reference collected ............................................................................................. 16 2.3 Soil survey ............................................................................................................................................. 18 2.3.1 Assessment team and their qualification .................................................................................. 18 2.3.2 Soil survey method..................................................................................................................... 18 2.4 High Carbon Stock (HCS) Assessment ................................................................................................... 19 2.4.1 Assessment team and their qualification .................................................................................. 19 2.4.2 High carbon stock assessment method ..................................................................................... 21 2.4.2.1 FPIC Process before field assessment ................................................................................. 21 2.4.2.2 Description of images used in the assessment ................................................................... 22 2.4.2.3 Methods for stratification and software used .................................................................... 22 2.4.2.3.1 Accuracy test ................................................................................................................ 22 ii | P a g e RSPO New Planting Procedure Report PT Lestari Abadi Perkasa Report Number CU-NPP-864817 2.4.2.4 Field sampling designs and plots used ................................................................................ 23 2.4.2.5 Methodology used for sampling in the field (forest) .......................................................... 23 2.4.2.6 The methodology used for carbon calculation ................................................................... 24 2.4.2.7 Statistical analysis method .................................................................................................. 24 2.4.2.8 Patch analysis ...................................................................................................................... 25 2.5 GHG calculation..................................................................................................................................... 25 2.5.1 Assessment team and their qualification .................................................................................. 25 2.5.2 GHG calculation method ............................................................................................................ 26 2.5.2.1 Land cover stratification and soil type ................................................................................ 26 2.5.2.1.1 Stratification of land cover ........................................................................................... 26 2.5.2.1.2 Stratification of soil type .............................................................................................. 27 2.5.2.2 Carbon stock assessment .................................................................................................... 27 2.5.2.2.1 Vegetation carbon stock .............................................................................................. 27 2.5.2.3 GHG emission hotspot map ................................................................................................ 27 2.5.2.4 Development scenario ........................................................................................................ 28 2.5.2.5 Team responsible for developing the mitigation plan ........................................................ 28 2.6 Land Use Change Analysis (LUCA) ......................................................................................................... 28 2.6.1 Assessment team and their qualification .................................................................................. 28 2.6.2 Land use change analysis (LUCA) method ................................................................................. 29 2.6.2.1 Data and information used ................................................................................................. 29 2.6.2.2 Stages and process of land use cover change analysis ....................................................... 30 2.6.2.3 Preliminary analysis of satellite image data ....................................................................... 31 2.6.2.4 Ground truthing .................................................................................................................. 31 2.6.2.5 Data processing and analysis of land cover changes .......................................................... 32 2.7 Social Impact Assessment (SIA) ............................................................................................................. 32 2.7.1 Assessment team and their qualification .................................................................................. 32 2.7.2 Social Impact Assessment method ............................................................................................ 33 3. Summary of finding ...................................................................................................... 35 3.1 SEIA ....................................................................................................................................................... 35 3.1.1 Positif and negative environmental impact ............................................................................... 35 3.1.2 Socio-economic impacts on the state, regional and local communities ................................... 36 iii | P a g e RSPO New Planting Procedure Report PT Lestari Abadi Perkasa Report Number CU-NPP-864817 3.1.3 Issues raised by stakeholders and assessor comments ............................................................. 36 3.1.4 List of legal documents owned .................................................................................................. 38 3.2 HCV assessment .................................................................................................................................... 39 3.2.1 National and regional context ................................................................................................... 39 3.2.2 Landscape context ..................................................................................................................... 39 3.2.3 Physical ....................................................................................................................................... 50 3.2.4 Social and Culture .....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • RECENT ORNITHOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS from BURU by Paul Jepson (Final Manuscript Received 21 April 1993)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KUKILA KUKILA 6 No. 2 (1993): 85 - 109 RECENT ORNITHOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS FROM BURU by Paul Jepson (Final manuscript received 21 April 1993) Summary The island of Buru was visited between 8 Nov and 10 Dec 1969 and surveys conducted from field stations in the north-west of the island. A total of 112 species was recorded, including six of Bum's ten endemic species. Four of the endemic species, Pnoniturus mada, Monarcha loricatus, Rhipidura superflua and Zosterops buruensis were found to be quite common, but Lichmera deningeri and Cworacina fortis are considered to be uncommon or rare. The mountains or Burn from where Madanga ruficollis and Rhinomyias addita have previously beea collected were not visited. Concern is expressed concerning the status of two endemic parrots, Charmosyna toxopei and Tanypiathus gramineus, which were not conclusively recorded and which appear to have always been rare. Six species were recorded for the first tune on Buru. Introduction The Manchester Indonesia Islands Expedition visited the island of Buru between 8 Nov and 10 Dec 1989. The aim of the expedition was to obtain data related to the conservation of bird faunas. The results of the analysis of data on the ecology and habitat preferences of the bird species will appear elsewhere. The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic list of birds recorded on Bum by the expedition, and to publish notes collected for some of the species on moult, nests and vocalisations. During the last sixty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Uses of Tree Species and Contribution of Mixed Tree Gardens to Livelihoods of Saleman Village Near the Manusela National Park, Seram Island, Maluku (Indonesia)
    Local uses of tree species and contribution of mixed tree gardens to livelihoods of Saleman village near the Manusela National Park, Seram Island, Maluku (Indonesia) Master’s thesis Ariane Cosiaux Master “Biodiversité Végétale Tropicale” 2012 Ariane Cosiaux 2012 Master’s internship from 7 March to 17 August 2012 at : Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Jalan CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia Supervisor : Yves Laumonier CIRAD scientist in the research unit « Tropical Forest Goods and Ecosystem Services » Aknowledgments I first want to thank Yves Laumonier for allowing me to do this internship, for his availability and advices. And I want to thank him for allowing me to discover the amazing Island of Seram. I would like to thank also Pak Purwanto from LIPI for his kindness and his invaluable advices for the ethnobotanical part of my study. I am grateful to him for his help to the realization of my questionnaire in bahasa Indonesia and his encouragements during the first two weeks of my field work. I am so grateful for the hospitality of the Saleman village. First I want to thank Nenek In and Hapipa for hosting me during my field work. Then I want to thank my field assistant Jul who help me and take care of me. A special thank goes to Bapak Hadir who taught me the name of plants in bahasa Saleman, for his kindness and availability. I also would like to thank Bapak Mustafa and Mama Ratna who also take care of me and help me for collecting voucher specimens. Finally, I like to thank Andre, Yaren and all the member of Nenek In family.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia
    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia Submitted in accordance with Foreign Assistance Act Sections 118/119 February 20, 2004 Prepared for USAID/Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 3-5 Jakarta 10110 Indonesia Prepared by Steve Rhee, M.E.Sc. Darrell Kitchener, Ph.D. Tim Brown, Ph.D. Reed Merrill, M.Sc. Russ Dilts, Ph.D. Stacey Tighe, Ph.D. Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms....................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................1- 1 2. Legislative and Institutional Structure Affecting Biological Resources...............................2 - 1 2.1 Government of Indonesia................................................................................................2 - 2 2.1.1 Legislative Basis for Protection and Management of Biodiversity and
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Consequences of Deforestation in the Moluccas
    Civilisations Revue internationale d'anthropologie et de sciences humaines 44 | 1997 Les peuples des forêts tropicales The human consequences of deforestation in the Moluccas Roy Ellen Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/civilisations/1628 DOI: 10.4000/civilisations.1628 ISSN: 2032-0442 Publisher Institut de sociologie de l'Université Libre de Bruxelles Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 1997 Number of pages: 176-193 ISBN: 2-87263-122-4 ISSN: 0009-8140 Electronic reference Roy Ellen, « The human consequences of deforestation in the Moluccas », Civilisations [Online], 44 | 1997, Online since 29 June 2009, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/civilisations/1628 ; DOI : 10.4000/civilisations.1628 © Tous droits réservés THE HUMAN CONSEQUENCES OF DEFORESTATION IN THE MOLUCCAS Roy ELLEN INTRODUCTION posing a danger t o existin g fores t an d fores t Compared with other part s of island sou­ peoples: swidden cultivation, plantatio n crop ­ theast Asia, little is known of either the forests of ping, commercial loggin g and migratory lan d the Moluccas (map 1) , o f indigenous patterns of settlement. Usin g as an example the Nuaulu of forest use , or of the threats pose d to both forest Seram, I illustrate ho w these factors interact in a and people by increasing rates of deforestation. In particular instance , as well a s the various phases this paper 1 attemp t to describe the effects of defo­ which typify a peoples exposure and response to, restation o n th e live s of th e loca l population , first, denudation, and then widespread degrada ­ using the small number of reports which are avai­ tion of the forest environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Range Extensions of Lycodon Capucinus BOIE, 1827 in Eastern
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Herpetozoa Jahr/Year: 2004 Band/Volume: 17_3_4 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kuch Ulrich, McGuire Jimmy A. Artikel/Article: Range Extensions of Lycodon capucinus BOIE, 1827 in eastern Indonesia 191-193 ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at SHORT NOTE HERPETOZOA 17 (3/4) Wien, 30. Dezember 2004 SHORT NOTE 191 Wiebeisheim (Aula). CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIC, J. & China, the Philippines, and Indonesia (DE ALEKSIC, I. (1999): First record of Coluber najadum Roou 1917; DE HAAS 1950; BOSCH 1985; EICHWALD (1831) in Serbia.-Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade; 51 (3): 47P-48P. DIMOVSKI, A. (1963): Herpetofauna ISKANDAR & COLIJN 2001). A recent colo- na skopska kotlina. I - zoogeografski i ekoloski pre- nization of Christmas Island, about 320 km gled.- Godisen zbornik Prirodno-matematickog fakul- south of Java, was reported by L. A. SMITH teta, Univerziteta u Skoplju, Skoplje; knjiga 14, (1988). In eastern Indonesia, L. capucinus Biologija2: 189-221. DIMOVSKI, A. (1966): Herpeto- fauna na skopska kotlina. II - faunisticki del.- Godisen has been known from central, southwestern, zbornik Prirodno-matematickog fakulteta, Univerziteta and southeastern Sulawesi (DE ROOU 1917; u Skoplju, Skoplje; knjiga 16, Biologija 4: 179-188. ISKANDAR & TJAN 1996) and from the DZUKIC, G (1972): Herpetoloska zbirka Prirodnjackog Lesser Sunda Islands of Sumbawa, Sumba, muzeja u Beogradu. (Herpetological collection of the Belgrade museum of natural history).- Glasnik Savu, Roti, Timor, Flores, Lomblem, Alor, Prirodnjackog muzeja, Beograd; (Ser. B) 27: 165-180. Lembata, and Wetar (DE ROOU 1917; How et DZUKIC, G (1995): Diverzitet vodozemaca (Amphibia) al.
    [Show full text]
  • Counting on Forests and Accounting for Forest Contributions in National
    WORKING PAPER Local uses of tree species and contribution of mixed tree gardens to livelihoods in Saleman Village near Manusela National Park, Seram Island, Maluku (Indonesia) Ariane Cosiaux Working Paper 137 Local uses of tree species and contribution of mixed tree gardens to livelihoods in Saleman Village near Manusela National Park, Seram Island, Maluku (Indonesia) Ariane Cosiaux Université Montpellier II (France) Working Paper 137 © 2014 Center for International Forestry Research Content in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Cosiaux A. 2014 Local uses of tree species and contribution of mixed tree gardens to livelihoods in Saleman: Village near Manusela National Park, Seram Island, Maluku (Indonesia). Working Paper 137. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. Cover photo by Ariane Cosiaux Fruit of a nutmeg tree CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] cifor.org We would like to thank all donors who supported this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Fund. For a list of Fund donors please see: https://www.cgiarfund.org/FundDonors Any views expressed in this book are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIFOR, the editors, the authors’ institutions, the financial sponsors or the reviewers. Contents Acknowledgments v 1 Introduction 1 1.1 General context 1 1.2 The CoLUPSIA project 1 1.3 The present study within
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia 12
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Indonesia Sumatra Kalimantan p509 p606 Sulawesi Maluku p659 p420 Papua p464 Java p58 Nusa Tenggara p320 Bali p212 David Eimer, Paul Harding, Ashley Harrell, Trent Holden, Mark Johanson, MaSovaida Morgan, Jenny Walker, Ray Bartlett, Loren Bell, Jade Bremner, Stuart Butler, Sofia Levin, Virginia Maxwell PLAN YOUR TRIP ON THE ROAD Welcome to Indonesia . 6 JAVA . 58 Malang . 184 Indonesia Map . 8 Jakarta . 62 Around Malang . 189 Purwodadi . 190 Indonesia’s Top 20 . 10 Thousand Islands . 85 West Java . 86 Gunung Arjuna-Lalijiwo Need to Know . 20 Reserve . 190 Banten . 86 Gunung Penanggungan . 191 First Time Indonesia . 22 Merak . 88 Batu . 191 What’s New . 24 Carita . 88 South-Coast Beaches . 192 Labuan . 89 If You Like . 25 Blitar . 193 Ujung Kulon Month by Month . 27 National Park . 89 Panataran . 193 Pacitan . 194 Itineraries . 30 Bogor . 91 Around Bogor . 95 Watu Karang . 195 Outdoor Adventures . 36 Cimaja . 96 Probolinggo . 195 Travel with Children . 52 Cibodas . 97 Gunung Bromo & Bromo-Tengger-Semeru Regions at a Glance . 55 Gede Pangrango National Park . 197 National Park . 97 Bondowoso . 201 Cianjur . 98 Ijen Plateau . 201 Bandung . 99 VANY BRANDS/SHUTTERSTOCK © BRANDS/SHUTTERSTOCK VANY Kalibaru . 204 North of Bandung . 105 Jember . 205 Ciwidey & Around . 105 Meru Betiri Bandung to National Park . 205 Pangandaran . 107 Alas Purwo Pangandaran . 108 National Park . 206 Around Pangandaran . 113 Banyuwangi . 209 Central Java . 115 Baluran National Park . 210 Wonosobo . 117 Dieng Plateau . 118 BALI . 212 Borobudur . 120 BARONG DANCE (P275), Kuta & Southwest BALI Yogyakarta . 124 Beaches . 222 South Coast . 142 Kuta & Legian . 222 Kaliurang & Kaliadem . 144 Seminyak .
    [Show full text]
  • Goura Victoria: COLUMBIDAE) in the RAINFORESTS of NORTHERN PAPUA, INDONESIA
    THE IMPACT OF HUNTING ON VICTORIA CROWNED PIGEON (Goura victoria: COLUMBIDAE) IN THE RAINFORESTS OF NORTHERN PAPUA, INDONESIA Dissertation for the award of degree of “Doctor rerum naturalium” (Dr.rer.nat) within the doctoral program biology of the Georg-August University School of Science (GAUSS) Submitted by Henderina Josefina Keiluhu Born in Sumbawa Besar-West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia Göttingen, 2013 Thesis Committee Prof. Dr. M. Mühlenberg Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology Prof. Dr. R. Willmann Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology Members of the Examination Board Reviewer: Prof. Dr. M. Mühlenberg Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology Second Reviewer: Prof. Dr. R. Willmann Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology Further members of the Examination Board Prof. Dr. C. Leuschner Albrecht von Haller Institute of Plant Sciences Prof. Dr. E. Bergmeier Albrecht von Haller Institute of Plant Sciences Prof. Dr. H. Behling Albrecht von Haller Institute of Plant Sciences PD. Dr. T. Hörnschemeyer Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology Place and date of the oral examination: Computer Room, Department of Conservation Biology, Center for Nature Conservation, Bürgerstrasse 50, 37073 Goettingen; October 30th, 2013 at 11.15 pm ii Acknowledgements I am very grateful to my supervisor Prof. Dr. M. Mühlenberg, Department of Conservation Biology, Georg-August University of Goettingen for enhancement my concepts about nature conservation. I also thank Prof. Dr. R. Willmann for being my second supervisor, and to Dr. Richard Noske for the valuable tutorial during proposal writing. The Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD) contributed generous financial support for my study.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Forest Tenure Reforms in Indonesia
    WORKING PAPER 223 Overview of forest tenure reforms in Indonesia Mia Siscawati Mani Ram Banjade Nining Liswanti Tuti Herawati Esther Mwangi Christine Wulandari Martina Tjoa Thomas Silaya Working Paper 223 Overview of forest tenure reforms in Indonesia Mia Siscawati Mani Ram Banjade Nining Liswanti Tuti Herawati Esther Mwangi Christine Wulandari Martina Tjoa Thomas Silaya Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Working Paper 223 © 2017 Center for International Forestry Research Content in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ DOI: 10.17528/cifor/006402 Siscawati M, Banjade MR, Liswanti N, Herawati T, Mwangi E, Wulandari C, Tjoa M and Silaya T. 2017. Overview of forest tenure reforms in Indonesia. Working Paper 223. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] cifor.org The authors declare that they have no competing of interests. All authors conceived and designed the study and approved the protocol. SS, PT and JC drafted the protocol. We would like to thank all funding partners who supported this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Fund. For a full list of CGIAR Fund Donors please see: http://www.cgiar.org/about-us/our-funders/ Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIFOR, the editors, the authors’ institutions, the financial sponsors or the reviewers. iii Contents List of figures and tables iv List of abbreviations v Abstract vi 1 Introduction 1 2 Historical overview of forest tenure in Indonesia 4 2.1 Colonial period (17th century to 1945) and the postcolonial Old Order era (1945–1966) 4 2.2 Forest tenure in the New Order regime (1966–1998) 5 3 Forest tenure in post New Order era (post May 1998–present) 8 4 Key forest tenure reforms in post New Order Indonesia 10 4.1 Forestry Law No.
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralisation of Administration, Policy Making and Forest Management in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan
    AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR INTERNATION- AL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Decentralisation of Administration, Policy Making and Forest Management in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan Endriatmo Soetarto, MT Felix Sitorus and Yusup Napiri © 2001 by Center for International Forestry Research All rights reserved. Published in 2001 Printed by Subur Printing, Indonesia ISBN 979-8764-85-4 Published by Center for International Forestry Research Mailing address: P.O. Box 6596 JKPWB, Jakarta 10065, Indonesia Office address: Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede, Sindang Barang, Bogor Barat 16680, Indonesia Tel.: +62 (251) 622622; Fax: +62 (251) 622100 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.cifor.cgiar.org Decentralisation and Forests in Indonesia: An Overview of the Study ince early-2000, the Center for International Forestry S Research (CIFOR) has conducted research on the decentralisation of forest administration and policies affecting forests in Indonesia. This project has sought to document the real and anticipated impacts of decentralisation on forest management, forest community livelihoods, and economic development at the provincial and district levels. During the initial phase of this research, CIFOR conducted case studies in nine kabupaten or districts, in four provinces: Riau, East Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan, and West Kalimantan. These case studies were carried out in 2000, with follow up visits to some districts conducted in early 2001. As such, the findings presented in the present report and the companion case studies reflect the conditions and processes that existed in the study districts during the initial phase of Indonesia’s decentralisation process. The following reports have been produced by this project. The first of these represents a synthesis of the major findings from the nine case studies, accompanied by a historical analysis of forest administration and forestry sector development in Indonesia, and a discussion of the origins and legal-regulatory basis of the nation’s ongoing decentralisation process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Ecology of Spatial Development Initiatives, Indonesia
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following work: Langston, James Douglas (2019) The political ecology of spatial development initiatives, Indonesia. PhD Thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: https://doi.org/10.25903/5dbf7d7862ca1 Copyright © 2019 James Douglas Langston. The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owners of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please email [email protected] The Political Ecology of Spatial Development Initiatives, Indonesia Landscape in Lombok, Indonesia, by James Langston James Douglas Langston, MDP Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Agriculture, Environmental and Related Studies) May, 2019 The College of Science and Engineering James Cook University Acknowledgements My research is inspired by the time I’ve spent with local communities across the tropics – in Asia, Africa, and the Americas. But I first thank my primary advisors, Professors Jeff Sayer and Intu Boedhihartono, for the unimagined opportunities granted to me, making this research possible. Early time spent with them in their Development Practice Program at James Cook University instilled a philosophically broad-based commitment to research in me. The tenets of that philosophy are taking empathetic, integrated, improvisational (in a musical, jazz sense), experiential, and anti-fragile approach to learning and life. I cannot thank them enough for their inspiration, guidance, and the opportunities they provided. The expansive network of friends and colleagues built over the time of this research, was made possible by my advisors.
    [Show full text]
  • From Seram Island, Indonesia
    Journ. Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 63 : 421-424 (Dec. 1987) A NEW SPECIES OF LEPIDOZIA (HEPATICAE) FROM SERAM ISLAND, INDONESIA HIROSHI DOEl! Very recently, I reported ten species of Lepidozia (Lepidoziaceae) from Seram Island, Indonesia, on the basis of a collection made by the botanical expeditions to Central Moluccas of the University of Tokyo and Herbarium Bogoriense (Doei 1987). In the collection, I found a distinctive new species of Lepidozia. The species is best characterized by the filiform plants as well as by the unlobed and long triangular leaves. As the species was recorded as nomen nudum in that paper, I will formally describe it below. I wish to express my cordial thanks to Prof. M. Tamura of Kobe University for his kind advice and encouragement throughout the present study. Thanks are also due to Mr. H. Akiyama of Kyoto University who kindly afforded me an opportunity to study his interesting collection and to Prof. N . Kitagawa of Nara University of Educa­ tion who gave me valuable suggestions and critical advice. Lepidozia integrifolia Doei, sp. novo (Fig. I) Planta dioica, magna, ad 70 mm longa, filiformis, rufobrunnea. Folia remota, suberecta vel erecto-patula, anguste triangulata, integra, fere symmetrica, apice acuta. Cellulae foliorum subquadratae ad rectangulares, parietibus aequaliter incrassatis, trigonis nullis. Amphigastria remota, parva, tra­ peziformia vel subquadrata, subintegra, appressa. Plants long and filiform, regularly pinnate, reddish brown in herbarium material, ascend­ ing or prostrate, in compact mats. Stems up to 70 mm long, 180-230.um thick, with leaves 400- 500 .urn wide, composed of about 33 rows of cortical cells; outermost cortical cells mostly 12- 18 x 7- 10 .urn in cross section and 25-38 x 12-15 flm in longitudinal section, walls very thick; inner cortical cells rather small; medullary cells larger (15-25 x 8-13 flm); lateral branches up to 40 mm long, 70-150 flm thick, with leaves 380-500 flm wide, usually tapering and flagelliform; rhizoids sparse.
    [Show full text]