DOCSLIB.ORG

INDEX to GENERA and SPECIES Genera and Species Listed in Appendices Are Not Indexed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INDEX to GENERA and SPECIES Genera and Species Listed in Appendices Are Not Indexed INDEX TO GENERA AND SPECIES Genera and species listed in appendices are not indexed Abarema filamentosa . 483 minuta ........................ 444 Abrophyllum . .. 223 Arenga undulatifolia .................. 444 Abryna regispetri .................... 94 Argyrodendron peralatum . 373 Acacia. .. 11 Arhopala buddTia .................... 292 Acalypha stipulacea .................. 327 metamuta ....................... 292 Acantho/epsls ...................... 120 Armigeres ....................... 89, 97 Acanthomyrmex ..................... 120 dolichocephalus . .. 93 Acer saccharum ..................... 219 flavus .. .. 93 Acmena acuminatissima ................ 327 Artocarpus ovatus .................... 328 Acronychia vestita ................... 219 Asyndetus . 185 Acropsilus . 185 Athertonia diversifolia .. .. 224, 225 Acropyga ......................... 120 Atta ............................ 10 Actyolepis puspa .................... 292 Attalea acaulis . 479 Acylophorus ................... 88-91, 93 funifera .................. 477-479, 483 Adinandra ...................... .. 223 humilis ........................ 483 Aedes gombakensis . .. 93 Baccaurea kunst/eri . 155 Aenictus . 120 Bactris . 483 Afromomum ..................... .. 219 Baptista ................. 88-90, 93, 96, 97 Agelaea bomeensis ................... 441 Barbodes collingwoodi .... 309-312, 380, 381, 384 Aglaia ditfusa ...................... 327 Barringtonia . 429 iloilo ......................... 328 Basilia hispida . .. 91 llanosiana ...................... 327 Batraxis . .. 93 longipes . 328 Begonia . .. 155, 167 luzoniensis ...................... 327 cyanescens . .. 48 Ahaetulla fasciolatus . 318 guttata ........................ 155 prasinus ................... 155,318 phoeniogramma ................... 155 Ahemia glandulosa ................... 328 Beilschmiedia bancroftii . 224 Ajuga ........................... 325 brunnea . 224 Allnzia pedicellaris . 483 recurva . 224 Aleurites cordata ................ 221, 225 tooram ........................ 224 moluccana . 225 Berenicomis comatus .................. 155 Allactoneura .. .. 93 Betula allegheniensis . 220 Allantus integrifolia ................... 328 Bischofia javanica ................... 328 Allostethella guttata .................. 92 Blastophaga wassae .................. 285 Allotinus . .. 293, 294 Boesenbergia burttiana .............. 48, 50 Alocasia guttata . .. 48 Boiga drapiezii ..................... 318 lowii .......................... 48 Borassodendron bomeense .............. 444 Alphitonia . 223 Bowenia spectabilis ................... 221 petriei . .. 226 Brachyrhynchus . .. 92 Alpmia glabra . .. 48 Brachystegia ....................... 543 ATseodaphne longipes ................. 328 Bradysia . .. 93 Alstonia . 348 Bronchocela cristatella ............ 318, 321 scholaris ....................... 328 Bruguiera ......................... 429 Amblyopone ....................... 11 Bubo coromandus . 156 Amblypsilopus ...................... 185 Bucephalandra motleyana . .. 48 Amegl1la ....................... 59, 64 Buceros bicomis ..................... 155 Amomum ......................... 47 rhinoceros ...................... 155 Amphiesma flavifrons . 318 Bufo asper ........................ 317 Amydrium medium ................... 48 divergens ....................... 317 Andira . .......................... 483 juxtasper ................... 317,321 Andropadus curvirostris . 106 Bulbitermes . 300 Anguilla marmorata ........ 309,380,381,384 Bvrsonima sericea ................... 483 Amsoptera thurifera .................. 235 Calamus . ...................... 23, 167 Annona salzmanii .. .. 483,484 amplijugus . 526 Anopheles asiaticus . .. 89, 90, 93 comptus . .. 442, 526 Anoplolepis . .. 120, 294 comrostris ...................... 526 Anorrhinus galeritus .................. 155 jlabellatus ...................... 526 Ansonia albomaculata ............. 317,321 laevigatus ...................... 526 leptopus . 317 manan ......................... 430 longtdigita . 317 muricatus . 526 spinuliJer ................... 317,321 pogonacanthus ................... 526 Anthene emolus ..................... 292 praeterrnissus .................... 526 Anthocephalus chinensis . 223 sordidus ....................... 526 Aonyx cinerea .................. 343, 427 zonatus .... 526 Aphaenogaster ................... 11, 120 Caleta roxus ....................... 293 Aphanamixis perrottetiana .............. 328 Callicarpa .................... 226, 363 Aphantaulax ....................... 92 Callosclurus ....................... 74 Apis ........................ 59, 62-65 melanogaster .................... 427 andreniformis .. 61, 62 notatus .............. 177, 178, 343, 344 cerana .................... 61-63, 65 prevostii ................ 177, 178, 343 dorsata ...................... 59 62 Ca{ophyllum ....................... 412 koschevnikovi ................ 59, 6 i -65 inophylloides .................... 429 mellifera .................. 62, 63, 65 Calyptomena viridis .................. 428 Aplopeltura boa ..................... 318 Campnospermum .................... 348 Aporosa lunata ........... 367, 368, 370, 371 Camponotus ............. 10, 120, 292, 339 Apostasia elliptica ................... 48 gigas .......... 62,331-334,336-339,362 Apterygodon vittaturn . 318 Camptandra ....................... 155 Arachnothe ra crassirostris .............. 107 Camptopteromyia fractipennis . 90, 93 longirostris . 107 Canarium . 462 Aralia elata . 221 asperum ....................... 328 Araucaria . 284 Caprrcorms sumatraensis ............... 156 Arborophila charltoni ................. 155 Carebara ......................... 11 Ardisia ........................... 328 Carpinus betulus .................... 219 Areca catechu . 444 Carya ....................... 224, 226 547 548 GENUS AND SPECIES INDEX Casearia ......................... 483 minor . ........................ 89 arborea ........................ 217 Culicoides ........................ 93 commersoniana ................... 483 Cupania oblongifolia . 483 fuligunosa ...................... 328 Cupha erymanthis . 128 Castanea ......................... 226 Curculigo racemosa .................. 445 Castanopsis . 284 vilosa ......................... 445 Casuarina equisetifolia ................ 429 Curcuma ......................... 442 Casuarius . .. 224 Curetis bulis ....................... 293 Cataulacus .. 120 santana . 293 Candacaecilia nigroflava ............... 317 bianthUS gardneri .................. 483 Celtis luzonica ...................... 328 clemys dentata .................... 155 Centromyrme.x . .. 11 Cepora ludith ...................... 131 ~~ptis' : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1~~ pactolicus ...................... 131 inopterus shim .................... 427 Ceratobolus concolor ................. 526 rina ........................... 223 Ceratosolen bisulcatus . .. 285 rtandra . .. 46-48, 221 gressitti . 285 bai/eyana . 221 medlerianus ..................... 285 pendulijlora ..................... 48 nexilis ......................... 285 Cyrtodiopsis ................... 170, 173 Cercropia . .. 11 dalmanni . 173 Cerpachys ........................ 11 quinqueguttata ............... 170, 173 Cervus unicolor . .. 343,427 whitei .. .. 170, 172, 173 Ceyx erithacus . .. 101, 105 Cyrtostachys renda . .. 444, 446 Chaetocarpus ...................... 483 Dacalana ......................... 132 Chaetogonopteron ............... 185, 188 Dacrycarpus cumingianus ............... 329 Chaetospama feae ................... 92 Daemonorops didymophylla ............. 526 Chapenna fusca . 317 korthalsii . 526 Charaxes dumfordi ................... 132 longipes . 526 Chela ..................... 380-382, 384 oxycarpa . 526 Cheritra freja ...................... 293 periacantha ..................... 526 Chersodromia .................. 185, 186 Daphne .......................... 325 Chiropodomys gliroides ................ 156 Dasyhela assimilis ................. 89, 93 karlkoopmani .................... 427 grata ....................... 89, 93 Chisocheton pentandrus ................ 328 Dasyprocta punctata ... 226 Chrysopelea pelias ................... 318 Decamorium . .. 11 Chrysosoma ................... 185, 187 Delonix regia ...................... 462 Chrysotus . 185 Dendrelaphis caudolineatus .............. 318 Cinnamomum laubatii ................. 224 Dendrocalamus pendulus ............... 97 mercadoi ....................... 327 Dendrocnide moroides . .. 226, 228 Cirrochroa emalea ................... 131 Diacamma ........................ 120 tyche ......................... 131 intricatum ................... 331-338 Clarias leiacanthus ............ 380,381,384 rugosum ....................... 362 teijsmanni ............ 309, 380-382, 384 Dialium .......................... 429 Cleistocalyx operculata ................ 327 Dianella .......................... 445 Clethra ...................... 223, 329 Diaphorus ........................ 185 Clidemia capitellata ................ .. 483 Dicerorhinus sumatraensis .............. 155 ClinodiploslS . .. 93 Dichapetalum ...................... 441 Clogmw . .. 89, 90, 93 Dicrurus hottentotus .................. 428 Clubiona ......................... 92 leaucophaeus .................... 428 Clusia ........................... 483 Dicuspiditermes nemorosus .... 299, 300, 302, 303 Coccoloba ........................ 483 Didymocarpus . .. 46 Colobopsis .................... 120,362 lanceolatus . .. 48 Commersonia ...................... 223 Dinoderus . .. 90 bartramia ....................... 227 Dioscorea
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Polyommatinae)
    Zootaxa 3860 (2): 195–200 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3860.2.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CDDB0DDD-3904-457F-B77E-4AEC414B654A Neurellipes rhoko sp. n. from the Cross River Loop, Eastern Nigeria (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Polyommatinae) SZABOLCS SÁFIÁN Institute of Silviculture and Forest Protection, University of West Hungary. Bajcsy-Zsilinszky út 4. H-9400 Sopron, Hungary Butterfly Conservation Society, Ghana, TDC Serviced plot E-109. Community 14 Lashibi-Tema, Ghana. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new species belonging to the recently revised Neurellipes mahota-group has been found in the Cross River Loop, East- ern Nigeria. It resembles the recently described Liberian N. georgiadisi Larsen, 2009, but differs from it by the wing shape and the extent and shape of orange patches on the hindwing, also on the forewing, especially in the discoidal cell. The species is described as N. rhoko sp. n.; a detailed comparison with the other species in the N. mahota-group is given, as well as notes on the biogeography of N. rhoko and its Liberian sub-region vicariant N. georgiadisi. Key words: Neurellipes, mahota-group, N. mahota, N. gola, N. georgiadisi, West Africa, Liberian sub-region, biogeog- raphy, allopatry Introduction All African species with orange spotting previously placed in the genus Anthene Doubleday, were removed by Libert (2010), who transferred them to Neurellipes, a genus previously comprising many fewer species, including a group of smaller sized orange-spotted species.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies-Of-Thailand-Checklist-2018
    PAPILIONIDAE Parnassinae: Bhutanitis lidderdalii ocellatomaculata Great Bhutan ผเี สอื้ ภฐู าน Papilioninae: Troides helena cerberus Common Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองป่ าสงู Troides aeacus aeacus Golden Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองธรรมดา Troides aeacus malaiianus Troides amphrysus ruficollis Malayan Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองปักษ์ใต ้ Troides cuneifera paeninsulae Mountain Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองภเู ขา Atrophaneura sycorax egertoni Whitehead Batwing ผเี สอื้ คา้ งคาวหวั ขาว Atrophaneura varuna zaleucus Burmese Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวพมา่ Atrophaneura varuna varuna Malayan Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวมาเลย์ Atrophaneura varuna astorion Common Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวธรรมดา Atrophaneura aidoneus Striped Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวขา้ งแถบ Byasa dasarada barata Great Windmill ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ ใหญ่ Byasa polyeuctes polyeuctes Common Windmill ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ ธรรมดา Byasa crassipes Small Black Windmill ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ เล็กด า Byasa adamsoni adamsoni Adamson's Rose ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ อดัมสนั Byasa adamsoni takakoae Losaria coon doubledayi Common Clubtail ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ หางกวิ่ Losaria neptunus neptunus Yellow-bodied Clubtail ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ กน้ เหลอื ง Losaria neptunus manasukkiti Pachliopta aristolochiae goniopeltis Common Rose ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ จดุ ชมพู Pachliopta aristolochiae asteris Papilio demoleus malayanus Lime Butterfly ผเี สอื้ หนอนมะนาว Papilio demolion demolion Banded Swallowtail ผเี สอื้ หางตงิ่ สะพายขาว Papilio noblei Noble's Helen ผเี สอื้ หางตงิ่ โนเบลิ้ Papilio castor mahadeva Siamese Raven ผเี สอื้ เชงิ ลายมหาเทพสยาม
    [Show full text]
  • Title Butterflies Collected in and Around Lambir Hills National Park
    Butterflies collected in and around Lambir Hills National Park, Title Sarawak, Malaysia in Borneo ITIOKA, Takao; YAMAMOTO, Takuji; TZUCHIYA, Taizo; OKUBO, Tadahiro; YAGO, Masaya; SEKI, Yasuo; Author(s) OHSHIMA, Yasuhiro; KATSUYAMA, Raiichiro; CHIBA, Hideyuki; YATA, Osamu Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto Citation University (2009), 30(1): 25-68 Issue Date 2009-03-27 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/156421 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Contn bioL Lab, Kyoto Univ., Vot. 30, pp. 25-68 March 2009 Butterflies collected in and around Lambir Hills National ParK SarawaK Malaysia in Borneo Takao ITioKA, Takuji YAMAMo'rD, Taizo TzucHiyA, Tadahiro OKuBo, Masaya YAGo, Yasuo SEKi, Yasuhiro OHsHIMA, Raiichiro KATsuyAMA, Hideyuki CHiBA and Osamu YATA ABSTRACT Data ofbutterflies collected in Lambir Hills National Patk, Sarawak, Malaysia in Borneo, and in ks surrounding areas since 1996 are presented. In addition, the data ofobservation for several species wimessed but not caught are also presented. In tota1, 347 butterfly species are listed with biological information (habitat etc.) when available. KEY WORDS Lepidoptera! inventory1 tropical rainforesti species diversity1 species richness! insect fauna Introduction The primary lowland forests in the Southeast Asian (SEA) tropics are characterized by the extremely species-rich biodiversity (Whitmore 1998). Arthropod assemblages comprise the main part of the biodiversity in tropical rainforests (Erwin 1982, Wilson 1992). Many inventory studies have been done focusing on various arthropod taxa to reveal the species-richness of arthropod assemblages in SEA tropical rainforests (e.g. Holloway & lntachat 2003). The butterfly is one of the most studied taxonomic groups in arthropods in the SEA region; the accumulated information on the taxonomy and geographic distribution were organized by Tsukada & Nishiyama (1980), Yata & Morishita (1981), Aoki et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Variation and Agronomic Features of Metroxylon Palms in Asia and Pacific
    Chapter 4 Genetic Variation and Agronomic Features of Metroxylon Palms in Asia and Pacific Hiroshi Ehara Abstract Fourteen genera among three subfamilies in the Arecaceae family are known to produce starch in the trunk. The genus Metroxylon is the most productive among them and is classified into section Metroxylon including only one species, M. sagu (sago palm: called the true sago palm), distributed in Southeast Asia and Melanesia and section Coelococcus consisting of M. amicarum in Micronesia, M. salomonense and M. vitiense in Melanesia, M. warburgii in Melanesia and Polynesia, and M. paulcoxii in Polynesia. In sago palm, a relationship between the genetic distance and geographical distribution of populations was found as the result of a random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. A smaller genetic variation of sago palm in the western part than in the eastern part of the Malay Archipelago was also found, which indicated that the more genetically varied populations are distributed in the eastern area and are possibly divided into four broad groups. Metroxylon warburgii has a smaller trunk than sago palm, but the trunk length of M. salomonense, M. vitiense, and M. amicarum is comparable to or longer than that of sago palm. Their leaves are important as building and houseware material, and the hard endosperm of M. amicarum and M. warburgii seeds is utilized as craftwork material. Preemergent young leaves around the growing point of M. vitiense are utilized as a vegetable. Regarding starch yield, palms in Coelococcus are all low in the dry matter and pith starch content as compared with sago palm. For this reason, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiroshi Ehara · Yukio Toyoda Dennis V. Johnson Editors
    Hiroshi Ehara · Yukio Toyoda Dennis V. Johnson Editors Sago Palm Multiple Contributions to Food Security and Sustainable Livelihoods Sago Palm Hiroshi Ehara • Yukio Toyoda Dennis V. Johnson Editors Sago Palm Multiple Contributions to Food Security and Sustainable Livelihoods Editors Hiroshi Ehara Yukio Toyoda Applied Social System Institute of Asia; College of Tourism International Cooperation Center for Rikkyo University Agricultural Education Niiza, Saitama, Japan Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan Dennis V. Johnson Cincinnati, OH, USA ISBN 978-981-10-5268-2 ISBN 978-981-10-5269-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5269-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017954957 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018, corrected publication 2018. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Iberian Anisolabididae (Dermaptera)
    Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 63(1), pp. 29–43, 2017 DOI: 10.17109/AZH.63.1.29.2017 TAXONOMY OF IBERIAN ANISOLABIDIDAE (DERMAPTERA) Mario García-París Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MNCN-CSIC c/José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006, Madrid. Spain. E-mail: [email protected] An update on the taxonomy and geographic distribution of Iberian Anisolabididae (Der- maptera) is provided. Former catalogues reported in the Iberian Peninsula three genera of Anisolabididae: Aborolabis, Anisolabis, and Euborellia. A revision of 487 specimens of Iberian and North African Anisolabidoidea permit to exclude the genus Aborolabis from the Iberian fauna, the re-assignation of inland Euborellia annulipes Iberian records to Euborellia moesta, and the exclusion of Aborolabis angulifera from Northwestern Africa. Examination of type materials of Aborolabis mordax and Aborolabis cerrobarjai allows to propose the treatment of A. cerrobarjai as a junior synonym of A. mordax. The diagnostic characters of Euborellia his- panica are included within the local variability found in E. moesta. I propose that E. hispanica should be treated as a junior synonym of E. moesta. Key words: earwigs, systematics, Mediterranean region, Spain, Morocco, NW Africa. INTRODUCTION The Iberian fauna of Dermaptera, including Anisolabididae Verhoeff, 1902, has been the subject of diverse revisionary (Bolívar 1876, 1897, Lapeira & Pascual 1980, Herrera Mesa 1980, Bivar de Sousa 1997) and compilatory works (Herrera Mesa 1999). These revisions together with the monograph of the Fauna of France (Albouy & Caussanel 1990) and the on-line information included in Fauna Europaea (Haas 2010), rendered the image of Dermaptera as a well known group in continental western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploitation of Lycaenid-Ant Mutualisms by Braconid Parasitoids
    31(3-4):153-168,Journal of Research 1992 on the Lepidoptera 31(3-4):153-168, 1992 153 Exploitation of lycaenid-ant mutualisms by braconid parasitoids Konrad Fiedler1, Peter Seufert1, Naomi E. Pierce2, John G. Pearson3 and Hans-Thomas Baumgarten1 1 Theodor-Boveri-Zentrum für Biowissenschaften, Lehrstuhl Zoologie II, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany 2 Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138-2902, USA 3 Division of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Western State College, Gunnison, CO 81230, USA Abstract. Larvae of 17 Lycaenidae butterfly species from Europe, North America, South East Asia and Australia were observed to retain at least some of their adaptations related to myrmecophily even after parasitic braconid larvae have emerged from them. The myrme- cophilous glandular organs and vibratory muscles of such larval carcasses remain functional for up to 8 days. The cuticle of lycaenid larvae contains extractable “adoption substances” which elicit anten- nal drumming in their tending ants. These adoption substances, as well, appear to persist in a functional state beyond parasitoid emer- gence, and the larval carcasses are hence tended much like healthy caterpillars. In all examples, the braconids may receive selective advantages through myrmecophily of their host larvae, instead of being suppressed by the ant guard. Interactions where parasitoids exploit the ant-mutualism of their lycaenid hosts have as yet been recorded only from the Apanteles group in the Braconidae- Microgasterinae. KEY WORDS: Lycaenidae, Formicidae, myrmecophily, adoption sub- stances, parasitoids, Braconidae, Apanteles, defensive mechanisms INTRODUCTION Parasitoid wasps or flies are major enemies of the early stages of most Lepidoptera (Shaw 1990, Weseloh 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Morphologically Modified Epizoic Earwigs Based on Molecular Evidence
    When the Body Hides the Ancestry: Phylogeny of Morphologically Modified Epizoic Earwigs Based on Molecular Evidence Petr Kocarek1*, Vaclav John2, Pavel Hulva2,3 1 Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic, 2 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, 3 Life Science Research Centre, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic Abstract Here, we present a study regarding the phylogenetic positions of two enigmatic earwig lineages whose unique phenotypic traits evolved in connection with ectoparasitic relationships with mammals. Extant earwigs (Dermaptera) have traditionally been divided into three suborders: the Hemimerina, Arixeniina, and Forficulina. While the Forficulina are typical, well-known, free-living earwigs, the Hemimerina and Arixeniina are unusual epizoic groups living on molossid bats (Arixeniina) or murid rodents (Hemimerina). The monophyly of both epizoic lineages is well established, but their relationship to the remainder of the Dermaptera is controversial because of their extremely modified morphology with paedomorphic features. We present phylogenetic analyses that include molecular data (18S and 28S ribosomal DNA and histone-3) for both Arixeniina and Hemimerina for the first time. This data set enabled us to apply a rigorous cladistics approach and to test competing hypotheses that were previously scattered in the literature. Our results demonstrate that Arixeniidae and Hemimeridae belong in the dermapteran suborder Neodermaptera, infraorder Epidermaptera, and superfamily Forficuloidea. The results support the sister group relationships of Arixeniidae+Chelisochidae and Hemimeridae+Forficulidae. This study demonstrates the potential for rapid and substantial macroevolutionary changes at the morphological level as related to adaptive evolution, in this case linked to the utilization of a novel trophic niche based on an epizoic life strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN 2320-5407 International Journal of Advanced Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue 1, 206-211
    ISSN 2320-5407 International Journal of Advanced Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue 1, 206-211 Journal homepage: http://www.journalijar.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH RESEARCH ARTICLE BUTTERFLY SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE IN MANIKKUNNUMALA FOREST OF WESTERN GHATS, INDIA. M. K. Nandakumar1, V.V. Sivan1, Jayesh P Joseph1, M. M. Jithin1, M. K. Ratheesh Narayanan2, N. Anilkumar1. 1 Community Agrobiodiversity Centre, M S Swaminathan Research Foundation,Puthoorvayal, Kalpetta, Kerala- 673121, India 2 Department of Botany, Payyanur College, Edat P.O., Kannur, Kerala-670327, India Manuscript Info Abstract Manuscript History: Butterflies, one of the most researched insect groups throughout the world, are also one of the groups that face serious threats of various kinds and in Received: 11 November 2014 Final Accepted: 26 December 2014 varying degrees. Wayanad district is one of the biodiversity rich landscapes Published Online: January 2015 within the biodiversity hot spot of Western Ghats. This paper essentially deals with the abundance and diversity of butterfly species in Key words: Manikkunnumala forest in Wayanad district of Western Ghats. The hilly ecosystem of this area is under various pressures mainly being Butterfly diversity, Abundance, anthropogenic. Still this area exhibits fairly good diversity; this includes Wayanad, Western Ghats some very rare and endemic butterflies. When assessed the rarity and *Corresponding Author abundance, six out of 94 recorded butterflies comes under the Indian Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. The area needs immediate attention to conserve the M. K. Nandakumar remaining vegetation in order to protect the butterfly diversity. Copy Right, IJAR, 2015,. All rights reserved INTRODUCTION Butterflies are one of the unique groups of insects, which grasp the attention of nature lovers worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversiteitsopname Biodiversity Assessment
    Biodiversiteitsopname Biodiversity Assessment Bome - Trees (77 sp) Veldblomme - Flowering veld plants (65 sp) Grasse - Grasses (41 sp) Naaldekokers - Dragonflies (46 sp) Skoenlappers - Butterflies (81 sp) Motte - Moths (95 sp) Nog insekte - Other insects (102 sp) Spinnekoppe - Spiders (53 sp) Paddas - Frogs (14 sp) Reptiele - Reptiles (22 sp) Voëls - Birds (185 sp) Soogdiere - Mammals (23 sp) 4de uitgawe: Jan 2015 Plante/Plants Diere/Animals (24 000 spp in SA) Anthropoda Chordata (>150 000 spp in SA) Arachnida Insecta (spinnekoppe/spiders, 2020 spp in SA) Neuroptera – mayflies, lacewings, ant-lions (385 spp in SA) Odonata – dragonflies (164 spp in SA) Blattodea – cockroaches (240 spp in SA) Mantodea – mantids (185 spp in SA) Isoptera – termites (200 spp in SA) Orthoptera – grasshoppers, stick insects (900 spp in SA) Phthiraptera – lice (1150 spp in SA) Hemiptera – bugs (>3500 spp in SA) Coleoptera – beetles (18 000 spp in SA) Lepidoptera – butterflies (794 spp in SA), moths (5200 spp in SA) Diptera – flies (4800 spp in SA) Siphonoptera – fleas (100 spp in SA) Hymenoptera – ants, bees, wasps (>6000 spp in SA) Trichoptera – caddisflies (195 spp in SA) Thysanoptera – thrips (230 spp in SA) Vertebrata Tunicata (sea creatures, etc) Fish Amphibia Reptiles Birds Mammals (115 spp in SA) (255 spp in SA) (858 spp in SA) (244 spp in SA) Bome – Trees (n=77) Koffiebauhinia - Bauhinia petersiana - Dainty bauhinia Rooi-ivoor - Berchemia zeyheri - Red ivory Witgat - Boscia albitrunca - Shepherd’s tree Bergvaalbos - Brachylaena rotundata - Mountain silver-oak
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    HAMADRYAD Vol. 27. No. 2. August, 2003 Date of issue: 31 August, 2003 ISSN 0972-205X CONTENTS T. -M. LEONG,L.L.GRISMER &MUMPUNI. Preliminary checklists of the herpetofauna of the Anambas and Natuna Islands (South China Sea) ..................................................165–174 T.-M. LEONG & C-F. LIM. The tadpole of Rana miopus Boulenger, 1918 from Peninsular Malaysia ...............175–178 N. D. RATHNAYAKE,N.D.HERATH,K.K.HEWAMATHES &S.JAYALATH. The thermal behaviour, diurnal activity pattern and body temperature of Varanus salvator in central Sri Lanka .........................179–184 B. TRIPATHY,B.PANDAV &R.C.PANIGRAHY. Hatching success and orientation in Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1829) at Rushikulya Rookery, Orissa, India ......................................185–192 L. QUYET &T.ZIEGLER. First record of the Chinese crocodile lizard from outside of China: report on a population of Shinisaurus crocodilurus Ahl, 1930 from north-eastern Vietnam ..................193–199 O. S. G. PAUWELS,V.MAMONEKENE,P.DUMONT,W.R.BRANCH,M.BURGER &S.LAVOUÉ. Diet records for Crocodylus cataphractus (Reptilia: Crocodylidae) at Lake Divangui, Ogooué-Maritime Province, south-western Gabon......................................................200–204 A. M. BAUER. On the status of the name Oligodon taeniolatus (Jerdon, 1853) and its long-ignored senior synonym and secondary homonym, Oligodon taeniolatus (Daudin, 1803) ........................205–213 W. P. MCCORD,O.S.G.PAUWELS,R.BOUR,F.CHÉROT,J.IVERSON,P.C.H.PRITCHARD,K.THIRAKHUPT, W. KITIMASAK &T.BUNDHITWONGRUT. Chitra burmanica sensu Jaruthanin, 2002 (Testudines: Trionychidae): an unavailable name ............................................................214–216 V. GIRI,A.M.BAUER &N.CHATURVEDI. Notes on the distribution, natural history and variation of Hemidactylus giganteus Stoliczka, 1871 ................................................217–221 V. WALLACH.
    [Show full text]