DOCSLIB.ORG

Anuario Estadístico 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anuario Estadístico 2017 Transporte por ferrocarril 12 12.1. LONGITUD TOTAL DE LA RED FERROVIARIA, POR COMUNIDADES AUTÓNOMAS. 2017 Kilómetros 1.800 1.700 ELECTRIFICADA 1.600 1.500 SIN ELECTRIFICAR 1.400 1.300 1.200 1.100 1.000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 ANDALUCÍA ARAGÓN ASTURIAS, P. DEBALEARS, ILLESCANTABRIA CAST.-LA MANCHACASTILLA Y LEÓNCATALUÑA C. VALENCIANAEXTREMADURAGALICIA MADRID, C. DEMURCIA, R. DENAVARRA, C. F.PAÍS DE VASCO RIOJA, LA 12.2. LONGITUD DE LA RED TITULARIDAD DE ADIF Y ADIF Alta Velocidad (*) SEGÚN LAS CARACTERÍSTICAS DE LA VÍA. AÑO 2017 3.076,21 TOTAL RED TITULARIDAD ADIF ELECTRIFICADA 3.754,63 12.149,34 km 6.830,84 km TOTAL RED TITULARIDAD ADIF Av SIN ELECTRIFICAR 3.152,50 km 5.318,50 km 20,59 5.297,91 57,24 118,80 1.206,88 Red titularidad ADIF Vía doble Vía única 2.514,21 2.630,77 10.766,42 71,33 ELECTRIFICADA 237,39 566,96 2.868,16 km SIN ELECTRIFICAR 284,34 km Ancho UIC Ancho métrico 284,34 Ancho mixto Ancho ibérico Red titularidad ADIF Av (*) Longitud de la red ferroviaria, propiedad de Adif y Adif Alta Velocidad, conforme a la Declaración de red 2017 (datos a 31-12-2017). 12.3. EVOLUCIÓN DEL TRANSPORTE DE VIAJEROS(*): VIAJEROS Y VIAJEROS-km SEGÚN TIPO DE RECORRIDO. 2008-2017 Viajeros Viajeros-km Millones 660 Millones 640 11.000 620 10.000 600 CERCANÍAS 580 9.000 560 8.000 CERCANÍAS 540 Alta velocidad (**) 7.000 520 500 6.000 35 5.000 30 Alta velocidad (**) REGIONALES (Media distancia convencional) Larga distancia convencional 25 4.000 20 3.000 REGIONALES (Media distancia convencional) 15 2.000 10 Larga distancia convencional 1.000 5 0 0 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (*) Todas las compañías. (**) AVE Larga y media distancia. 12.4. DISTRIBUCIÓN DEL NÚMERO DE VIAJEROS SEGÚN COMPAÑÍAS, EN FUNCIÓN DEL TIPO DE SERVICIO. AÑOS 2014-2017 Renfe Operadora Compañías CC. AA.(*) y particulares Millones de viajeros Millones de viajeros 450 90 400 80 350 70 300 2014 60 2015 250 2016 50 2017 200 40 150 30 100 20 50 10 0 0 Alta velocidad Largo recorrido Media distancia Cercanías FGC SFM EUSKOTREN TREN SÓLLER convencional convencional (*) (*) Líneas denominadas regionales (*) Cercanías. 12.5.DISTRIBUCIÓN PORCENTUAL DEL NÚMERO DE VIAJEROS Y DE VIAJEROS-km SEGÚN COMPAÑÍAS Y RECORRIDO MEDIO 2017 COMPAÑÍAS DE CC. AA. Recorrido medio del viajero Viajeros Y PARTICULARES 20,2 (viajeros-km/viajeros) 55 50 45 40 RENFE OPERADORA (*) 79,8 35 Viajeros-km 30 COMPAÑÍAS DE CC. AA. Renfe Operadora Y PARTICULARES 5,3 25 Feve (*) Cías. CC. AA. 20 y particulares 15 10 5 0 RENFE OPERADORA (*) 94,7 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (*) En 2013, la compañía Feve quedó integrada en Renfe Operadora. 12.6. DISTRIBUCIÓN DE LA ACTIVIDAD FERROVIARIA POR TIPOLOGÍA DE SERVICIO (Trenes-km) (%). 2016-2017 2016 2017 Servicios comerciales OSP cercanías Servicios comerciales OSP cercanías AV 19,1 Madrid 13,1 AV 19,3 Madrid 13,1 Servicios comerciales LD convencional OSP rodalies OSP rodalies 16,9 Barcelona 10,4 Barcelona 10,4 OSP Cercanías Servicios OSP Cercanías 39,8 comerciales 39,9 LD convencional OSP resto 16,9 OSP resto cercanías 16,3 cercanías 16,4 OSP MD AVANT OSP MD AVANT 3,5 3,5 OSP MD convencional OSP MD convencional 17,0 OSP MD Cataluña 16,8 OSP MD Cataluña 3,7 3,7 12.7. DISTRIBUCIÓN DE LA OFERTA Y DEMANDA ENTRE SERVICIOS COMERCIALES Y OSP (%). 2017 100 Cercanías métrica 1,1% Cercanías métrica 0,4% 90 Cercanías 30,5% 80 Cercanías 41,7% 43% 70 OSP MD convencional (*) 61% 8,7% 60 MD AVANT 3,5% OSP MD convencional (*) 50 LD convencional 15,4% 18,6% 40 MD AVANT 3,2% LD convencional 30 14,2% 57% 20 AV 38,3% 39% AV 24,4% 10 0 OFERTA (plazas-km) DEMANDA (viajeros-km) SERVICIOS COMERCIALES AV OSP MD Avant OSP Cercanías SERVICIOS COMERCIALES LD convencional OSP MD convencional (*) OSP Cercanías Métrica (*) Incluida MD métrica. 12.8. EVOLUCIÓN DE LOS INDICADORES DE APROVECHAMIENTO SEGÚN TIPOLOGÍA DE LOS SERVICIOS (%). 2015-2017 Fuente: Renfe-Operadora Kilómetros 80 70 2015 2016 60 2017 50 40 30 20 10 0 Aprovechamiento TOTAL (*) Servicio comercial Servicio Público (**) Cercanías Cataluña Cercanías Madrid (*) Viajeros-km/plazas-km (**) Excluidos los servicios públicos de la red de MD Convencional de Cataluña, así como los servicios públicos de la red de Cercanías de Cataluña y Madrid. 12.9a. EVOLUCIÓN DEL TRANSPORTE DE MERCANCÍAS: TONELADAS Y TONELADAS-km. RENFE (*) Y CÍAS. PRIVADAS. 2008-2017 Toneladas netas Toneladas-km netas Millones Millones 30 12.000 28 11.000 TOTAL MERCANCÍAS 26 10.000 TOTAL MERCANCÍAS 24 22 9.000 20 8.000 18 7.000 16 TOTAL RENFE OPERADORA TOTAL RENFE OPERADORA INCLUIDA RENFE-MÉTRICA INCLUIDA RENFE-MÉTRICA 6.000 14 12 5.000 10 4.000 CÍAS. PRIVADAS 8 3.000 CÍAS. PRIVADAS 6 2.000 4 2 1.000 0 0 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (*) En 2013, la compañía Feve quedó integrada en Renfe Operadora. 12.9b. EVOLUCIÓN DEL TRANSPORTE DE MERCANCÍAS: t Y t/km. FEVE Y COMPAÑÍAS DE CC. AA. Y DE PARTICULARES. 2008-2017 Toneladas netas Toneladas-km netas Millones Millones 4,0 500 450 3,5 400 TOTAL FEVE (*) 3,0 350 TOTAL FEVE (*) 2,5 300 2,0 250 200 1,5 150 1,0 CÍAS. DE CC. AA. Y PARTICULARES 100 0,5 50 CÍAS. DE CC. AA. Y PARTICULARES 0 0 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (*) En 2013, la compañía Feve quedó integrada en Renfe Operadora. 12.10. EVOLUCIÓN DE LA ACCIDENTALIDAD EN LA RED FERROVIARIA DE INTERÉS GENERAL. 2007-2017 180 200 160 180 160 140 59 140 120 103 45 120 100 100 80 30 24 25 80 26 60 24 74 113 25 23 60 18 20 87 47 40 48 40 78 63 38 33 62 59 23 53 27 29 48 43 20 40 38 38 20 24 18 31 28 23 18 21 20 14 11 12 16 0 0 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOTAL ACCIDENTES SIGNIFICATIVOS TOTAL ACCIDENTES GRAVES TOTAL HERIDOS GRAVES TOTAL VÍCTIMAS MORTALES Distribución (%) según tipología del accidente Distribución (%) según causalidad del accidente Porcentaje Porcentaje 100 2,2 100 5,7 1,9 90 90 22,2 28,6 80 22,6 80 48,3 70 70 60,4 68,9 60 60 82,1 96,6 50 48,9 39,6 50 57,1 40 40 5,7 30 30 51,7 8,9 15,1 20 13,3 18,9 20 2,2 3,6 3,8 10 10 17,8 11,1 15,1 14,3 11,3 14,3 0 2,2 0 2,2 3,4 n.º accidentes n.º víctimas n.º accidentes n.º víctimas n.º accidentes n.º víctimas n.º accidentes n.º víctimas mortales mortales mortales mortales 2016 2017 2016 2017 Colisiones de tren De personas en relación material rodante Otras causas Fallo humano Usuarios del ferrocarril Colisión con un obstáculo Pasos a nivel (ajenas, desconocidas) Fallo del material rodante Climáticas y medio ambiente Descarrilamiento de tren Incendio en material rodante Fallo de las instalaciones Fallo de terceros Fuente: AESF (Agencia Estatal de Seguridad Ferroviaria). 12. Transporte por ferrocarril 1. Infraestructura (*). Longitud de la red ferroviaria según titularidad de la red Unidad: Kilómetros Total ADIF y ADIF Alta Velocidad (1) AÑOS Sin electrificar Electrificada Sin electrificar Electrificada Total Vía única Total Vía única Total Vía única Total Vía única 2000 6.559 6.538 7.788 4.156 5.368 5.347 6.942 3.599 2001 6.559 6.538 7.788 4.156 5.368 5.347 6.942 3.599 2002 6.499 6.478 7.927 4.131 5.348 5.327 6.975 3.576 2003 6.432 6.382 8.477 4.264 5.319 5.298 7.510 3.643 2004 6.447 6.305 8.338 4.123 5.316 5.295 7.521 3.632 2005 6.537 6.488 8.478 4.216 5.316 5.295 7.523 3.614 2006 6.486 6.422 8.726 4.272 5.266 5.231 7.725 3.605 2007 6.455 6.380 9.099 4.231 5.273 5.206 8.095 3.605 2008 6.434 6.334 9.116 4.198 5.262 5.170 8.091 3.577 2009 6.394 6.258 8.936 4.089 5.265 5.153 8.089 3.583 2010 6.398 6.260 9.439 4.082 5.271 5.157 8.582 3.582 2011 6.317 6.239 9.615 4.084 5.210 5.156 8.735 3.570 2012 6.268 6.221 9.654 4.052 5.191 5.144 8.739 3.554 2013 6.169 6.121 9.768 4.010 5.084 5.036 8.943 3.524 2014 (1) 6.184 6.111 9.717 3.952 5.099 5.026 8.877 3.454 2015 5.845 5.825 10.211 4.232 4.860 4.840 9.318 3.684 2016 5.784 5.764 10.138 4.231 4.798 4.778 9.322 3.686 2017 5.781 5.760 10.123 4.217 4.796 4.775 9.299 3.677 (continúa) 12.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Results
    February 2021 2020 RESULTS January - December TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT 6 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CASH FLOW 9 RESULTS BY DIVISION 12 ENERGY BUSINESS – 12 INFRASTRUCTURE BUSINESS 14 OTHER ACTIVITIES 16 SUSTAINABILITY 17 RELEVANT INFORMATION, DIVIDEND AND SHARE DATA 22 CONTACT INFORMATION 27 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 28 ANNEX 1: MW BREAKDOWN 31 ANNEX 2: PRODUCTION BREAKDOWN 32 ANNEX 3: TRANSPORT AND HOSPITAL CONCESSIONS BREAKDOWN 33 ANEXO 4: DETAILS OF WATER CONCESSIONS UNDER IFRIC12 34 1 LEGAL DISCLAIMER This document has been prepared by ACCIONA, S.A. (“ACCIONA” or the “Company”) exclusively for use during the presentation of financial results. Therefore it cannot be disclosed or made public by any person or entity with any aim other than the one expressed above, without the prior written consent of the Company. The Company does not assume any liability for the content of this document if used for different purposes thereof. The information and any opinions or statements made in this document have not been verified by independent third parties, nor audited; therefore no express or implied warranty is made as to the impartiality, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information or the opinions or statements expressed herein. Neither the Company, its subsidiaries or any entity within ACCIONA Group or subsidiaries, any of its advisors or representatives assume liability of any kind, whether for negligence or any other reason, for any damage or loss arising from any use of this document or its contents. The information contained in this document on the price at which securities issued by ACCIONA have been bought or sold, or on the performance of those securities, cannot be used to predict the future performance of securities issued by ACCIONA.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Risk, and White Elephants in Infrastructure Ppps
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 25, 2021 Politics, risk, and white elephants in infrastructure PPPs Daniel, Albalate; Germa, Bel; Albert, Gragera Published in: Utilities Policy Link to article, DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2019.05.001 Publication date: 2019 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Daniel, A., Germa, B., & Albert, G. (2019). Politics, risk, and white elephants in infrastructure PPPs. Utilities Policy, 58, 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2019.05.001 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Politics, Risk, and White Elephants in Infrastructure PPPs Albalate, Daniel †§; Bel, Germà †§* and Gragera, Albert ‡§ † Universitat de Barcelona, Departament d’Estadística, Econometria i Economia Aplicada, John Keynes 1-11, 08034 Barcelona, Spain. ‡ Technical University of Denmark, Bygningstorvet Building 116B, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. § Observatory of Analysis and Evaluation of Public Policies, Universitat de Barcelona.
    [Show full text]
  • LACCEI Paper
    Fourth LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCET’2006) “Breaking Frontiers and Barriers in Engineering: Education, Research and Practice” 21-23 June 2006, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico. Innovative Techniques in Planning and Finance of Public Transportation Projects: Lessons Learned and its Applications Ildefonso Burgos-Gil, PE, MCE General Manager for Mass Transit Development, Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, San Juan, PR, USA, [email protected] Abstract The International Transit Studies Program (ITSP) conducts two study missions each year to provide transit managers from across the United States the opportunity to examine public transportation practices in other countries and regions, with the goal of encouraging innovation domestically. The program is sponsored by the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP), funded by the Federal Transit Administration, and managed by the Eno Transportation Foundation. The subject for the 2005 Fall Study Mission was Innovative Techniques in Planning and Finance of Public Transportation Projects. The mission studied systems in Barcelona, Spain; Copenhagen, Denmark; Shanghai, China; and Osaka, Japan. As a participant, the author had the opportunity to meet with the managers for the different systems and learn and document the experience. This paper presents a more detailed insight on the author’s assigned studied systems in Barcelona, the way it has been integrated to become an effective transit system, its financial model, the lessons learned and its possible applications in Puerto Rico and elsewhere. Keywords integration, transit, planning, finance, public private partnership 1. Introduction The International Transit Studies Program (ITSP) conducts two study missions each year to provide transit managers from across the United States the opportunity to examine public transportation practices in other countries and regions, with the goal of encouraging innovation domestically.
    [Show full text]
  • Estudio De Los Tranvías De España En La Actualidad
    ESTUDIO DE LOS TRANVÍAS DE ESPAÑA EN LA ACTUALIDAD PROYECTO FINAL DE CARRERA: Estudio de los tranvías de España en la actualidad Carmen Castañer Castillo DIRECTOR Luis Lezaún ESPECIALIDAD Mecánica CONVOCATORIA Junio 2010 ESTUDIO DE LOS TRANVÍAS DE ESPAÑA EN LA ACTUALIDAD ÍNDICE 1. Introducción ..................................................................................................................... 1 2. Historia del tranvía........................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Historia del tranvía de Zaragoza.............................................................................. 5 2.1.1 Antiguas líneas del tranvía............................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Las Primeras Máquinas................................................................................. 12 3. Funcionamiento del tranvía............................................................................................ 15 3.1. Clasificación .......................................................................................................... 17 4. Tranvías de España en la actualidad .............................................................................. 18 4.1. Tranvías Comunidad Valenciana........................................................................... 19 4.1.1. Valencia ......................................................................................................... 19 4.1.2. Alicante.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BARCELONA TRAM SERVICE (SPAIN) PPP for CITIES Specialist Centre on PPP in Smart and Sustainable Cities
    WITH THE SUPPORT OF: PPP for CITIES Specialist Centre on PPP in Smart and Sustainable Cities PPP FOR CITIES CASE STUDIES BARCELONA TRAM SERVICE (SPAIN) PPP for CITIES Specialist Centre on PPP in Smart and Sustainable Cities Josep Navarro, Joan Enric Ricart, Francesc Trillas, Miquel Rodríguez Planas & Jordi Salvador With the collaboration of Barcelona's Autoritat del Transport Metropolità (ATM) September 2017 PPP FOR CITIES CASE STUDIES BARCELONA TRAM SERVICE (SPAIN) Josep Navarro, Joan Enric Ricart, Francesc Trillas, Miquel Rodríguez Planas & Jordi Salvador With the collaboration of Barcelona's Autoritat del Transport Metropolità (ATM) PPP FOR CITIES The Specialist Centre on PPPs in Smart and Sustainable Cities (PPP for Cities) is a research, innovation and advisory center that aims to provide public administrations throughout the world with support in the organization, management and development of projects involving collaboration between the public and private sectors in the smart cities arena. It is also a partnership platform between companies and administrations from all over the world where they can further explore the dynamics of public-private partnerships, create guides to good practices and standards and design solutions to the issues facing cities. The center is led by IESE Business School and is part of the United Nations’ International Centre of Excellence on PPPs program. It has the support and sponsorship of Barcelona City Hall and other public administrations and private companies. This document was prepared by the Public-Private-Sector Research Center as a document of interest for the study of public private partnerships rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Diapositiva 1
    GINPROSA Corporation GINPROSA Presentation Founded in 1990 Central Office in MADRID: 21.500 Sq Ft Independent Company (stockholders works in the company) Offices distributed all over Spain Multidisciplinary Team of Civil Engineering Commercial & custom-made Software INTERNATIONAL Presence GINPROSA Activities Feasibility Studies Engineering Reports Preliminary and Detailed Design Projects Quality Control Construction Management & Supervision Business areas: • Roads & Highways • Transportation • Structures • Water Supply & Waste Water Infrastructures • Buildings • Master Planning & Development GINPROSA. Organizational Chart GINPROSA in Numbers GINPROSA. The Company. Staff GINPROSA's staff is comprised of a young and dynamic team of over one hundred professionals GINPROSA RELEVANT Works MEJORA DE LA ACCESIBILIDAD A MATARÓ. CARRETERA C-31. TRAMO: CABRERA DE MAR-MATARÓ. (Detailed design project for the modernization of the link road of Mataro. Section: Cabrera de Mar-Mataro. Province: Barcelona) Owner GISA. GENERALITAT DE CATALUNYA. (Catalonia State Goverment) Completion Year Not started Construction Budget US$ 190 Millions Contractor company No Awarded Relevant details: Length: 13,800 m. Structure : 8 Viaducts, 9 Bridges, 12 different level crossings, 10 retaining walls, 1 Tunnel 209.45 m, 1 Tunnel 202.9 m. Services performed: Detailed Design Project. HIGHWAYS AUTOVÍA RUTA DE LA PLATA. CN-630 DE GIJÓN A SEVILLA. TRAMO: ZAMORA(N)-ZAMORA(S). PROVINCIA DE ZAMORA. Highway A-66 “Ruta de la Plata”. CN-630 from Gijón to Sevilla. Section: Zamora (N)-Zamora (S). Province: Zamora Owner MINISTERIO DE FOMENTO. DEMARCACION DE CARRETERAS DEL ESTADO EN CASTILLA Y LEON OCCIDENTAL. (Ministry of Public Works. Government of Spain) Completion Year 2009 Construction Budget US$ 95 Millions Contractor company J.V. ZARZUELA – BEJAR (Zamora N- Rio Duero) ; J.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoria De Actividades Fundacionales 2020
    Memoria de actividades 2020 Índice LA FUNDACIÓN Introducción ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Órganos de la Fundación ................................................................................................................. 10 Fines de la Fundación ........................................................................................................................ 12 Actividades a desarrollar para el cumplimiento de sus fines ......................................... 13 Datos económicos ............................................................................................................................... 14 Relaciones Institucionales ............................................................................................................... 17 Plan Estratégico .................................................................................................................................... 21 MEMORIA DE ACTIVIDADES Museo del Ferrocarril de Madrid .................................................................................................. 29 Museo del Ferrocarril de Cataluña .............................................................................................. 61 Acción Cultural y Comunicación .................................................................................................. 73 Vías Verdes .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • La Liberalización Del Sector Ferroviario De Personas
    FACULTAD DE DERECHO LA LIBERALIZACIÓN DEL SECTOR FERROVIARIO DE PERSONAS Autor: Cristina María Arcas Rubio 4 º E-1 JGP Derecho Administrativo Tutor: Antonio Jesús Alonso Timón Madrid Mayo, 2020 Resumen La liberalización de sector ferroviario de personas se hará efectiva en diciembre de 2020 tras un largo proceso de transposición de paquetes ferroviarios comunitarios al ordenamiento jurídico español. Por ende, nuevas compañías ferroviarias se incorporarán a la prestación de servicios de transporte ferroviario de viajeros que competirán con el operador histórico. El sector ferroviario español presenta ventajas considerables gracias a la calidad de sus infraestructuras ferroviarias. Sin embargo, es fundamental realizar un análisis de los posibles obstáculos que pueden sobrevenir con motivo de la apertura de la competencia a otras empresas ferroviarias. Palabras clave Sector ferroviario; liberalización del sector ferroviario; apertura de la competencia en el sector ferroviario de personas; empresas ferroviarias; ferrocarril. Abstract The liberalization of the railway sector will be effective in December 2020 after a lengthy process of transposition of community railway packages to the Spanish legal order. Thus, new railway companies will join the service delivery of the railway transport of passengers that will compete with the historic operator. The Spanish railway sector brings considerable advantages thanks to the quality of its railway infrastructures. However, it is important to carry out an analysis of the possible obstacles that can occur due to the opening of the competition to other railway undertakings. Keywords Railway sector; liberalization of the rail sector; the opening of the competition of the railway sector; railway companies; railway. 2 ÍNDICE LISTADO DE ABREVIATURAS ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 3. Descripció I Anàlisis Dels Actors En El Trambaix I El Trambesòs
    ANNEX 3: Descripció i análisis dels actors en el Trambaix i el Trambesòs 2010 Annex 3. Descripció i anàlisis dels actors en el Trambaix i el Trambesòs CONTINGUTS DE L’ANNEX 3 1 Introducció ............................................................................................................................ 1 2 Els Actors polítics:.................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Alcaldes dels Municipis per on discorre la traça del Trambaix ..................................... 2 2.2 Alcaldes dels Municipis per on discorre la traça del Trambesòs................................... 3 2.3 El Govern de la Generalitat de catalunya ...................................................................... 3 2.4 Altres organismes político‐administratius .................................................................... 3 3 actors institucionals Públics i privats .................................................................................... 4 3.1 Entitats públiques de transport a Barcelona ................................................................. 4 4 TRAMMET: Empresa Gestora del Trambaix i el Trambesòs .................................................. 5 5 Operadors del Trambaix i el Trambesòs ............................................................................... 6 6 actors econòmics i Financers del Trambaix i el Trambesòs .................................................. 8 7 Les empreses constructores del Trambaix ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Model and the Capacity Awarded This Its Highest Qualification, Included in This Report the Valuation
    •2/3 corporation in the current energy model and the capacity awarded this its highest qualification, included in this report the valuation of ACCIONA to reduce CO2 emissions by A+, in the same way as the principles of by a Committee of Independent Experts General Shareholders’ Meeting 2007 more than 1% by 2030, necessary to palliate Accountability standard AA1000. In its formed by Transparencia Internacional, ACCIONA approves a 25% increase in dividends the effect of the climate change. efforts to be at the forefront of good WWF Adena, WorldBank Institute, practices in this field, ACCIONA has included Fundación Economistas sin Fronteras Sustainability Report 2006 three innovative measures in its work and Fundación Economía y Desarrollo. The Sustainability Report for 2006 methodology: This valuation of key issues is very positive The General Shareholders’ Meeting of was presented at the Shareholders’ - Contents definition test: ACCIONA has globally and indicates the lines followed ACCIONA, held last 6th June, approved the Meeting, stating and taking to effect the prepared a previous study to select the most for improvement. distribution of supplementary dividends of commitments of ACCIONA with regard to substantial and representative contents for - Approval by the Board of Directors: 1.83 gross euros per share which, added to the principles of sustainable development, the different stakeholders and to include Sustainability Report 2006 has been formally the dividend on account of 1.06 gross euros good governance and corporate them in the report. submitted to the Board of Directors of paid in January, gives dividends per share of responsibility. The Report was prepared in - Committee of Independent Experts: ACCIONA, upon proposal by the Auditing 2.89 gross euros in year 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • What If the Smartest Decision Was to Invest in the Planet
    WHAT IF THE SMARTEST DECISION WAS TO INVEST IN THE ¿ PLANET INTEGRATED REPORT 2019 WHAT IF THE SMARTEST DECISION WAS TO INVEST IN THE ¿ PLANET INTEGRATED REPORT 2019 I Index 4 6 22 Letter At a glance The first company of a new from the Chairman sector The future is challenging 24 Business as Unusual 32 Investing in the planet 34 Experts in designing a better planet 40 INTEGRATED REPORT 2019 118 154 156 The value of doing About this report Appendices things right _ Effective, strategic, Appendix I 156 customised governance 118 Appendix II 170 Exemplary conduct under a compliance framework 138 Integrated focus on risk control and management 140 Diverse talent with expertise in designing a better planet 144 Innovation to lead the change 148 174 Leading the way to a sustainable, decarbonised Independent Assurance economy 152 Report I Letter from the Chairman Letter from the Chairman José Manuel Entrecanales CHAIRMAN OF ACCIONA ACCIONA's 2019 Integrated Report is being published in volunteers around the world who provided support and the midst of one of the most acute crises that humanity assistance where we were required. There are no borders has faced in recent history. This situation has created in this crisis, no states, no north or south. great uncertainty and severely tested the mechanisms that our society and its institutions have to resist and Situations like the one we are experiencing encourage 4 overcome adversity, however unexpected and unknown. us to persevere in our main mission as a company, focused on strengthening the basic mechanisms that My thoughts are with everyone who has lost a loved one make societies work.
    [Show full text]
  • "Report on Competition in Railway Freight Transport in Spain"
    "REPORT ON COMPETITION IN RAILWAY FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN SPAIN" TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I. INTRODUCTION 7 II. LEGAL AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF RAIL FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN SPAIN 9 II.1. Regulation of the rail freight sector 9 II.1.1. The gradual liberalisation of the sector in the EU 9 II.1.2. National rules 15 II.2. Economic characteristics of rail freight transport in Spain 31 II.2.1. Rail infrastructure 35 II.2.2. Rail freight transport 50 II.2.3. Access to rolling stock 60 II.2.4. Repair and maintenance of rolling stock 69 II.2.5. Additional, complementary and ancillary services 74 III. INDICATORS OF COMPETITIVENESS IN THE RAIL FREIGHT MARKET IN SPAIN 79 III.1. The Spanish rail network has a different rail structure from other European countries and less intensive use of the rail infrastructure 79 III.2. Rail represents a small proportion of the total in Spain, and in the last decade that proportion has declined more than in other countries 81 III.3. Spain is one of the countries where new companies have least penetrated the rail freight transport market in relative terms 84 III.4. According to various indicators, the Spanish rail incumbent is relatively inefficient 85 IV. FACTORS LIMITING THE LEVEL OF COMPETITION IN THE SPANISH RAIL SECTOR 95 IV.1. Factors relating to infrastructure 95 IV.1.1. International isolation 95 IV.1.2. Slow freight movement on the rail infrastructure 96 IV.1.3. Smaller average size of trains than in the main competitor countries 96 IV.1.4.
    [Show full text]