DOCSLIB.ORG

EMBARGOED for RELEASE: Wednesday, July 1 at 6:00 A.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EMBARGOED for RELEASE: Wednesday, July 1 at 6:00 A.M Interviews with 1,017 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC International on June 26-28, 2015. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage points. Results in this document labeled “All Americans” or “Total” are based on this sample of 1,017 adults. The sample also includes 890 interviews among registered voters (plus or minus 3.5 percentage points). The full sample includes 611 interviews among landline respondents and 406 interviews among cell phone respondents. Additional interviews were conducted among African-Americans, and combined with the African-Americans contacted in the initial sample of 75 for a total of 303 African-American respondents. The margin of sampling error for results based on this sample of African-Americans is plus or minus 5.5 percentage points. Columns in this document labeled "Whites" show results only for the 727 respondents in the initial sample who described themselves as white in a question on racial background and did not describe themselves as Hispanic or Latino in a separate question on ethnicity. (Sampling error for non- Hispanic whites is +/-3.5 percentage points.) Columns in this document labeled "Blacks" refer to all respondents who described themselves as black or African-American and did not describe themselves as Hispanic or Latino in a separate question on ethnicity. Trend results for racial groups are shown only for polls which had enough African-American respondents to produce statistically valid results. EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Wednesday, July 1 at 6:00 a.m. 5. How important will each of the following issues be to your vote for President next year -- will it be extremely important, very important, moderately important, or not that important? (RANDOM ORDER) Extremely Very Moderately Not that No important important important important opinion The economy June 26-28, 2015 47% 41% 11% 2% * June 26-28, 2015 (RV) 48% 41% 10% 1% * Feb. 12-15, 2015 41% 47% 11% 1% * Nov. 2-4, 2012 (RV) 58% 35% 6% 1% * June 28-July 1, 2012 51% 41% 6% 2% * October 14-16, 2011 54% 39% 6% 1% * June 3-7, 2011 51% 41% 6% 2% * October 17-19, 2008 61% 33% 5% 2% * June 26-29, 2008 58% 35% 6% 1% * Jan. 14-17, 2008 45% 41% 12% 2% * Nov. 2-4, 2007 34% 48% 16% 2% * May 4-6, 2007 33% 46% 16% 4% * Foreign policy June 26-28, 2015 32% 39% 22% 7% 1% June 26-28, 2015 (RV) 33% 40% 22% 5% 1% Feb. 12-15, 2015 28% 39% 25% 7% * Nov. 2-4, 2012 (RV) 41% 31% 21% 6% 1% June 28-July 1, 2012 24% 39% 26% 11% * October 14-16, 2011 23% 33% 32% 11% 1% Health care June 26-28, 2015 44% 39% 13% 4% * June 26-28, 2015 (RV) 44% 39% 13% 4% * Feb. 12-15, 2015 39% 40% 16% 5% * Nov. 2-4, 2012 (RV) 49% 33% 14% 3% * June 28-July 1, 2012 47% 40% 10% 3% * October 14-16, 2011 42% 38% 16% 3% * June 3-7, 2011 45% 41% 10% 3% * October 17-19, 2008 44% 38% 13% 4% * June 26-29, 2008 47% 36% 14% 3% * Jan. 14-17, 2008 41% 36% 19% 4% * Nov. 2-4, 2007 35% 41% 19% 5% * May 4-6, 2007 43% 35% 18% 4% * (RV) = Registered voter POLL 6 -2- June 26-28, 2015 3 5. How important will each of the following issues be to your vote for President next year -- will it be extremely important, very important, moderately important, or not that important? (RANDOM ORDER) Extremely Very Moderately Not that No important important important important opinion Illegal immigration June 26-28, 2015 30% 32% 26% 12% * June 26-28, 2015 (RV) 30% 33% 26% 11% * Feb. 12-15, 2015 29% 35% 26% 10% * June 28 – July 1, 2012 28% 31% 26% 14% * October 14-16, 2011 24% 28% 27% 19% * June 3-7, 2011 29% 33% 26% 12% * October 17-19, 2008 29% 31% 28% 12% * June 26-29, 2008 34% 33% 24% 9% 1% Jan. 14-17, 2008 31% 34% 23% 11% * Nov. 2-4, 2007 23% 38% 26% 13% * May 4-6, 2007 31% 32% 26% 10% 1% Terrorism June 26-28, 2015 48% 33% 14% 5% * June 26-28, 2015 (RV) 49% 32% 14% 5% * Feb. 12-15, 2015 42% 38% 14% 6% * June 28 – July 1, 2012 41% 30% 18% 10% * October 14-16, 2011 36% 36% 19% 9% * June 3-7, 2011 42% 33% 16% 8% 1% October 17-19, 2008 50% 33% 14% 3% * June 26-29, 2008 45% 32% 18% 4% * Jan. 14-17, 2008 42% 34% 19% 5% * Nov. 2-4, 2007 32% 44% 18% 6% * May 4-6, 2007 45% 35% 14% 6% * Race relations June 26-28, 2015 All Americans 28% 33% 27% 12% 1% Blacks 33% 48% 6% 11% 2% Whites 27% 33% 29% 11% * Same-sex marriage June 26-28, 2015 20% 21% 21% 37% 1% June 26-28, 2015 (RV) 20% 21% 21% 37% 1% Feb. 12-15, 2015 17% 22% 22% 38% * June 28 – July 1, 2012* 19% 16% 22% 42% * June 3-7, 2011* 17% 17% 21% 45% 2% *Prior to 2015 – “Gay marriage" (RV) = Registered voter POLL 6 -3- June 26-28, 2015 3 BASED ON 256 RESPONDENTS WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS REPUBLICANS AND 151 WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS INDEPENDENTS WHO LEAN REPUBLICAN, FOR A TOTAL OF 407 REPUBLICANS -- SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 5 PERCENTAGE PTS. 26. I'm going to read a list of people who may be running in the Republican primaries for president in 2016. After I read all the names, please tell me which of those candidates you would be most likely to support for the Republican nomination for president in 2016, or if you would support someone else. Jeb Bush, Ben Carson, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, Carly Fiorina, Lindsey Graham, Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, John Kasich, George Pataki, Rand Paul, Rick Perry, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, Donald Trump or Scott Walker. (RANDOM ORDER) June 26-28 May 29-31 Apr. 16-19 Mar. 13-15 Feb. 12-15 Dec. 18-21 Nov. 21-23 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2014 2014 Bush 19% 13% 17% 16% 14% 23% 14% Trump 12% 3% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Huckabee 8% 10% 9% 10% 16% 6% 10% Carson 7% 7% 4% 9% 8% 7% 11% Paul 7% 8% 11% 12% 10% 6% 8% Rubio 6% 14% 11% 7% 5% 5% 3% Walker 6% 10% 12% 13% 11% 4% 5% Perry 4% 5% 3% 4% 3% 4% 5% Christie 3% 4% 4% 7% 7% 13% 9% Cruz 3% 8% 7% 4% 3% 4% 7% Santorum 3% 2% 3% 1% 3% 2% 2% Jindal 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 4% 1% Kasich 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% Fiorina 1% 1% 2% * 1% N/A N/A Graham 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% N/A N/A Pataki * 3% * N/A N/A N/A N/A Pence N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * 1% Portman N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * * Ryan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5% 9% Someone else (vol.) 7% 5% 5% 4% 4% 5% 6% None/No one 6% 2% 5% 6% 7% 5% 2% No opinion 3% 1% 2% 3% 3% 3% 4% November, 2014 results show second choice of respondents who initially supported Mitt Romney when his name was included in the list. POLL 6 -4- June 26-28, 2015 3 BASED ON 236 REGISTERED VOTERS WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS REPUBLICANS AND 132 WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS INDEPENDENTS WHO LEAN REPUBLICAN, FOR A TOTAL OF 368 REPUBLICANS -- SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 5 PERCENTAGE PTS. 26. I'm going to read a list of people who may be running in the Republican primaries for president in 2016. After I read all the names, please tell me which of those candidates you would be most likely to support for the Republican nomination for president in 2016, or if you would support someone else. Jeb Bush, Ben Carson, Chris Christie, Ted Cruz, Carly Fiorina, Lindsey Graham, Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, John Kasich, George Pataki, Rand Paul, Rick Perry, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, Donald Trump or Scott Walker. (RANDOM ORDER) June 26-28 2015 (RV) Bush 17% Trump 12% Carson 8% Paul 8% Rubio 7% Walker 6% Huckabee 5% Perry 4% Santorum 4% Christie 3% Cruz 3% Kasich 3% Jindal 2% Fiorina 1% Graham 1% Pataki * Someone else (vol.) 5% None/No one 6% No opinion 3% (RV) = Registered voter 27. Omitted POLL 6 -5- June 26-28, 2015 3 BASED ON 256 RESPONDENTS WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS REPUBLICANS AND 151 WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS INDEPENDENTS WHO LEAN REPUBLICAN, FOR A TOTAL OF 407 REPUBLICANS -- SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 5 PERCENTAGE PTS. BASED ON 236 REGISTERED VOTERS WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS REPUBLICANS AND 132 WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS INDEPENDENTS WHO LEAN REPUBLICAN, FOR A TOTAL OF 368 REPUBLICANS -- SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 5 PERCENTAGE PTS. 28. Regardless of who you are voting for, which Republican candidate do you think can best handle: The economy Registered All voters Bush 20% 16% Trump 19% 20% Walker 7% 8% Paul 6% 7% Huckabee 5% 4% Rubio 5% 6% Carson 4% 3% Perry 4% 4% Santorum 3% 4% Christie 2% 3% Cruz 2% 2% Jindal 2% 1% Kasich 2% 2% Fiorina 1% 2% Graham 1% * Pataki 1% 1% Someone else (vol.) 1% 2% None/No one 6% 6% No opinion 9% 9% POLL 6 -6- June 26-28, 2015 3 BASED ON 256 RESPONDENTS WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS REPUBLICANS AND 151 WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS INDEPENDENTS WHO LEAN REPUBLICAN, FOR A TOTAL OF 407 REPUBLICANS -- SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 5 PERCENTAGE PTS.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bill Bolling Contemporary Virginia Politics
    6/29/21 A DISCUSSION OF CONTEM PORARY VIRGINIA POLITICS —FROM BLUE TO RED AND BACK AGAIN” - THE RISE AND FALL OF THE GOP IN VIRGINIA 1 For the first 200 years of Virginia's existence, state politics was dominated by the Democratic Party ◦ From 1791-1970 there were: Decades Of ◦ 50 Democrats who served as Governor (including Democratic-Republicans) Democratic ◦ 9 Republicans who served as Governor Dominance (including Federalists and Whigs) ◦ During this same period: ◦ 35 Democrats represented Virginia in the United States Senate ◦ 3 Republicans represented Virginia in the United States Senate 2 1 6/29/21 ◦ Likewise, this first Republican majority in the Virginia General Democratic Assembly did not occur until Dominance – 1998. General ◦ Democrats had controlled the Assembly General Assembly every year before that time. 3 ◦ These were not your “modern” Democrats ◦ They were a very conservative group of Democrats in the southern tradition What Was A ◦ A great deal of their focus was on fiscal Democrat? conservativism – Pay As You Go ◦ They were also the ones who advocated for Jim Crow and Massive resistance up until the passage of the Civil Rights Act of in 1965 4 2 6/29/21 Byrd Democrats ◦ These were the followers of Senator Harry F. Byrd, a former Virginia Governor and U.S. Senator ◦ Senator Byrd’s “Byrd Machine” dominated and controlled Virginia politics for this entire period 5 ◦ Virginia didn‘t really become a competitive two-party state until Ơͥ ͣ ǝ, and the first real From Blue To competition emerged at the statewide level Red œ
    [Show full text]
  • The Economist/Yougov Poll
    The Economist/YouGov Poll Sample 2000 General Population Respondents Conducted July 31 - August 4, 2015 Margin of Error ±2.9% 1. Some people seem to follow what’s going on in government and public affairs most of the time, whether there’s an election going on or not. Others aren’t that interested. Would you say you follow what’s going on in government and public affairs ... ? Most of the time . 45% Some of the time . 32% Only now and then . .13% Hardly at all . 9% Don’t know . .1% 2. Would you say things in this country today are... Generally headed in the right direction . 30% Off on the wrong track . 56% Not sure . 14% 3. Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people? Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t favorable favorable unfavorable unfavorable know Joe Biden 14% 27% 15% 26% 17% Lincoln Chafee 2% 10% 12% 14% 62% Hillary Clinton 21% 23% 10% 39% 7% Martin O’Malley 3% 13% 14% 14% 56% Bernie Sanders 15% 15% 14% 21% 36% Jim Webb 3% 13% 14% 11% 58% 1 The Economist/YouGov Poll 4. Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people? Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t favorable favorable unfavorable unfavorable know Jeb Bush 9% 25% 21% 28% 17% Ben Carson 14% 18% 12% 16% 40% Chris Christie 6% 22% 24% 27% 22% Ted Cruz 11% 20% 14% 26% 29% Carly Fiorina 9% 16% 12% 17% 45% Jim Gilmore 3% 8% 11% 12% 66% Lindsey Graham 4% 16% 19% 22% 39% Mike Huckabee 9% 22% 18% 25% 26% Bobby Jindal 7% 18% 14% 21% 40% John Kasich 6% 14% 13% 13% 53% George Pataki 2% 14% 17% 15% 52% Rand Paul 8% 26% 20% 19% 28% Rick Perry 7% 23% 15% 25% 30% Marco Rubio 11% 23% 15% 21% 30% Rick Santorum 6% 20% 16% 25% 33% Donald Trump 20% 16% 11% 44% 8% Scott Walker 14% 16% 10% 22% 37% 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Survey 2015
    VIRGINIA SURVEY 2015 PRINCETON DATA SOURCE FOR UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON PARTIAL FINAL TOPLINE – DAY ONE RELEASE NOVEMBER 16, 2015 Total Interviews: 1,006 Virginia adults, age 18 or older 402 landline interviews 604 cell phone interviews Margins of error: ±3.5 percentage points for results based on Total [N=1,006] ±3.9 percentage points for results based on Registered voters [N=814] ±4.3 percentage points for results based on Likely voters [N=656] (Likely voters defined as likely to vote in the November 2016 general election) Interviewing dates: November 4-9, 2015 Interviewing language: English only Notes: Because percentages are rounded, they may not total 100%. An asterisk (*) indicates less than 0.5%. TREND INFORMATION October 2014 trends are from the University of Mary Washington’s Virginia Survey Fall 2014, conducted October 1-6, 2014 among 1,000 Virginia adults age 18+, including 819 registered voters, reached on either a landline or cell phone. September 2013 trends are from the University of Mary Washington’s Virginia Survey Fall 2013, conducted September 25-29, 2013 among 1,001 Virginia adults age 18+, including 823 registered voters, reached on either a landline or cell phone. March 2013 trends are from the University of Mary Washington’s Virginia Survey March 2013, conducted March 20-24, 2013 among 1,004 Virginia adults age 18+, including 840 registered voters, reached on either a landline or cell phone. NOTE: Some questions are being held for subsequent release. PRINCETON DATA SOURCE 2 MAIN INTERVIEW USDIRECT. Overall, would you say that things in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Election Results
    COUNTY OF CAMDEN OFFICIAL ELECTION RESULTS 2016 General Election November 8, 2016 CAM_20161108_E November 8, 2016 Summary Report Camden County Official Results Registration & Turnout 347,739 Voters Board of Chosen Freeholders (cont'd...) (343) 343/343 100.00% Election Day Turnout 186,213 53.55% REP - Claire H. GUSTAFSON 68,131 17.25% Mail-In Ballot Turnout 39,712 11.42% DEM - Edward T. MC DONNELL 127,662 32.32% Provisional Turnout 5,554 1.60% DEM - Carmen G. RODRIGUEZ 128,299 32.48% Rejected Ballots Turnout 0 0.00% Write-In 346 0.09% Emergency Turnout 0 0.00% Total ... 394,984 100.00% Total ... 231,479 66.57% Audubon Park Council (1) 1/1 100.00% US President (343) 343/343 100.00% Under Votes: 480 Under Votes: 1892 Over Votes: 0 Over Votes: 540 DEM - Dennis DELENGOWSKI 313 50.16% REP - TRUMP/PENCE 72,631 31.71% DEM - Gloria A. JONES 306 49.04% DEM - CLINTON/KAINE 146,717 64.06% Write-In 5 0.80% NON - CASTLE/BRADLEY 752 0.33% Total ... 624 100.00% NON - JOHNSON/WELD 4,245 1.85% NON - LA RIVA/PURYEAR 50 0.02% Barrington Council (5) 5/5 100.00% NON - DE LA FUENTE/STEINBERG 77 0.03% Under Votes: 2594 NON - MOOREHEAD/LILLY 74 0.03% Over Votes: 0 NON - STEIN/BARAKA 2,003 0.87% NON - KENNEDY/HART 43 0.02% DEM - Wayne ROBENOLT 2,111 49.48% DEM - Michael BEACH 2,112 49.51% Write-In 2,455 1.07% Write-In 43 1.01% Total ... 229,047 100.00% Total ..
    [Show full text]
  • Senate (Legislative Day of Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 154 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 No. 150 Senate (Legislative day of Wednesday, September 17, 2008) The Senate met at 3 p.m., on the ex- U.S. SENATE, UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY piration of the recess, and was called to PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, BILL NELSON, of Florida, to be a Rep- order by the Honorable JIM WEBB, a Washington, DC, September 22, 2008. resentative of the United States of America To the Senate: to the Sixty-third Session of the General As- Senator from the Commonwealth of Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, Virginia. sembly of the United Nations. of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby BOB CORKER, of Tennessee, to be a Rep- appoint the Honorable JIM WEBB, a Senator resentative of the United States of America PRAYER from the Commonwealth of Virginia, to per- to the Sixty-third Session of the General As- The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- form the duties of the Chair. sembly of the United Nations. fered the following prayer: ROBERT C. BYRD, President pro tempore. f Let us pray. Almighty God, sovereign Lord of the Mr. WEBB thereupon assumed the LEGISLATIVE SESSION chair as Acting President pro tempore. universe, limitless, timeless, in whom The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- resides all wisdom and power, remind f pore. Under the previous order, the our Senators today that they have RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY Senate will now return to legislative nothing to fear about the future when LEADER session.
    [Show full text]
  • TEXAS LYCEUM 2015 Poll – DAY
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Margaret Justus Wednesday, October 1, 2015 281-250-8253 TEXAS LYCEUM 2015 Poll – DAY TWO Trump Leads in Texas Including a 21-16 Lead over Cruz & Crowd of Other Republican Presidential Contenders; Clinton Leads Sanders by 12 and Biden by 21 Gov. Abbott Gets 56% Approval Rating; President Obama, 52% AUSTIN — An independent poll conducted by the Texas Lyceum, a non-partisan, nonprofit statewide leadership group, shows billionaire real estate mogul and reality TV star Donald Trump leading U.S. Senator Ted Cruz by five points (21 percent-16 percent) in Texas in the 2016 Republican Presidential nominating contest. The survey also shows former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with a substantial lead in the Democratic primary, but trailing in a November 2016 general election among Texas voters. “We are proud to publicly share the results of our ninth Texas Lyceum Poll with Texas’ policymakers, scholars and citizens,” said 2015 Lyceum President Jane Cummins. “We included a diverse set of questions ranging from U.S. presidential contenders to a variety of issues facing our state. We will continue to use the poll as a foundation for discussion at our annual public conferences and quarterly meetings, and readily share these valuable data to inform public policy discussions in Texas.” Trump’s support in the Lyceum Poll remains consistent with national polls across most age groups: including those 65 and older, 45 to 64, and 30 to 44, only trailing retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson by one point (22 percent to 21 percent) among potential Republican Primary voters under the age of 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Allen and Webb Close, Kaine Would Be Formidable Replacement
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 17, 2010 INTERVIEWS: DEAN DEBNAM 888-621-6988 / 919-880-4888 (serious media inquiries only please, other questions can be directed to Tom Jensen) QUESTIONS ABOUT THE POLL: TOM JENSEN 919-744-6312 Allen and Webb close, Kaine would be formidable replacement Raleigh, N.C. – If he decides to run for re-election, Virginia Senator Jim Webb would start out in decent shape in a rematch with George Allen, and would be safer against two other potential Republican nominees. If Webb decides to hang up his hat after a single term, current DNC chairman and former Governor Tim Kaine would step in and do just as well. Recently defeated Congressman Tom Perriello, however, would not. In 2006, Webb defeated Allen by about 0.3% in a surprise upset after being dragged into the race. But Webb would start off the 2012 sequel with a wider 49-45 lead. He would also top Lieutenant Governor Bill Bolling, 49-38, and Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, 49-39. Should Webb step aside, Kaine would begin with a 50-44 edge over Allen, 48-41 over Bolling, and 50-39 over Cuccinelli. Perriello would trail Allen, 42-47, and Bolling, 41- 42, and he would only lead Cuccinelli, 44-41. The difference, in a state where they comprise almost a third of voters, is independents. Webb and Kaine lead all three Republicans by four to 13 points with unaffiliated voters, but Perriello trails by two to 15. Webb and Kaine also hold their base better and attract more Republican support.
    [Show full text]
  • Highest Aspirations:Virginians Hear Hail to the Chief Again
    Highest Aspirations: Virginians Hear Hail to the Chief Again By MICHAEL E. BELEFSKI Back in the 2010 Summer Issue of window is probably shut. But, as vice chairman of the U. S. Senate Virginia Capitol Connections, I wrote Intelligence Committee, he currently holds a national spotlight to “Recent Virginia Governors-Presidential investigate and obtain credible answers on Russia’s influence over Timber?” The time is ripe as an apple for an our 2016 presidential election which he said was taking up 100% of update. Virginians did not get to hear “Hail his time. to the Chief”. Let’s take a look how those seven years fared for our Virginia governors Bob Mc Donnell and look ahead to their future political We left that summer talking about endeavors. Former Governor Bob McDonnell’s George Allen Confederate history, gay rights and voting felon controversies. A popular When U.S. Senator Jim Webb decided governor with a 55%-32% approval not to run for re-election in 2012, Allen decided to disapproval rating at the end of his to run for his old seat. He easily won the GOP term, he was known for being a hard- nomination with 65% of the vote against working executive who advocated job Jamie Radtke (23%), Bob Marshall (7%), creation and funding for transportation and and E. W. Jackson (5%). In November, infrastructure improvements. Democrat Tim Kaine defeated him with In 2012, he was being considered as VEEP on the GOP ticket and 52.86%-46.96% of the vote. extensively toured the country on behalf of the Romney-Ryan ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • FL Annotated Questionnaire May 2012
    NBC News/WSJ/Marist Poll October 2015 New Hampshire Questionnaire Screener <Marist Poll Introduction> Are you 18 years of age or older? Do you consider your permanent home address to be in New Hampshire? HH SELECTION – LANDLINE FRAME ONLY GENDER GUESS October 2015: Registered voters: n=1044, MOE +/- 3.0%; Residents: n=1196, MOE +/- 2.8%; September 2015: Registered voters: n=966, MOE +/- 3.2%; Residents: n=1121, MOE +/- 2.9%; July 2015: Registered voters: n=910, MOE +/- 3.2%; Residents: n=1037, MOE +/- 3.0%; February 2015: Registered voters: n=887, MOE +/- 3.3%; Residents: n=1013, MOE +/- 3.1% Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president? REGISTERED VOTERS October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 February 2015 Approve 43 43 41 43 Disapprove 51 53 53 52 Unsure 7 5 6 5 Total 100 100 100 100 RESIDENTS October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 February 2015 Approve 42 42 41 43 Disapprove 51 52 52 50 Unsure 7 6 7 7 Total 100 100 100 100 October 2015: Registered independents n=451, MOE +/- 4.6%; September 2015: Registered independents n=413, MOE +/- 4.8%; July 2015: Registered independents n=395, MOE +/- 4.9% Now, thinking about the 2016 presidential primary in New Hampshire are you more likely to vote in the New Hampshire: REGISTERED INDEPENDENTS October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 Republican primary 37 36 39 Democratic primary 35 30 28 Wait to vote in the general election in November 26 33 30 Not planning to vote 2 1 2 Total 100 100 100 October 2015: Potential Republican Electorate: n=450, MOE +/ -4.6%; September 2015:
    [Show full text]
  • WRITE-IN Summary Report (All Candidates)
    WRITE-IN Summary Report (All Candidates) NC COMMISIONER OF LABOR BENJAMIN MILLER 1 BENJAMIN WITHROW 1 [BLANK] 141 BERNIE SANDERS 4 A J RAULYNAITIS JR 1 BERRY 1 AARON CARTER 1 BETH ROBERTSON 1 ABSTAIN 1 BIANCA ZUNIGA 1 ADAM L WOOD 1 BILL CYPHER 1 ADAM LEVINE 1 BILL HICKEY 1 ADAM M SMITH 1 BILL HOUSER 1 ADAM SU KIM 1 BONNIE "PRINCE" BILLY 1 ADRIAN WILKINS 1 BOY GEORGE 1 AIRELIO CASKAUS 1 BRADLY LEWIS 1 A-J DOG 1 BRANDAN THOMPSON 1 AKOM LOYD CHANDRASUON 1 BRANDON TUNG 1 AL DROHAN 1 BRIAN AKER 1 ALBERT R HUX JR 1 BRIAN IRVING 1 ALECIA L HOLLOMAN 1 BRIAN K WILLIS 1 ALLEN ROBERTSON 1 BRIAN WAYNE 8 AMANDA DAVIS 1 BRIAN YANDLE 1 AMANDA PAIGE 1 BRITNEY YOUNG 1 AMANDA RAY 1 BRUCE HORNE 1 ANDREA APPLE 1 BRUCE STOKES 1 ANDREA JOHN RANDYAITIS JR 1 BRYAN BAKER 1 ANDREW HOUSEKNECHT 1 BUGS BUNNY 1 ANDREW JAMES PHELPS 1 BUSTER EVANS 1 ANDREW PHELPS 1 CAEDON P HIRREL 1 ANDREW T PHELPS 1 CALVIN BERG 1 ANDREW THOMAS PHELPS 1 CAM NEWTON 2 ANDREW THOMAS WELLS 1 CANDLER THORNTON 1 ANDY DALTON 1 CARL PAUL ROHS 1 ANDY SEDDON 1 CHAD DOWNEY 1 ANSON ELLSTROM 1 CHAD FAISON 1 ANTHONY A BACK 1 CHARLES MEEKER 22 ANTHONY BIKOWSKI 1 CHARLIE TWITTY 1 ANTOINE JONES 1 CHERIE BERRY 5 ANYONE 1 CHIP MILLER 1 ANYONE ELSE 1 CHRIS HARRIS 1 AUSTIN AKER 1 CHRIS MUNIER 1 AVERY ASHLEY 1 CHRIS POST 1 BARBARA EWANISZYK 1 CHRIS SNYDER 1 BARBARA HOWE 1 CHRISOPHER RYAN DAVIS 1 BARNARY ALRIRE 1 CHRISTINA LOPER 1 BARRY MORGAN 1 CHRISTOPHER SIMPSON 1 BARRY RYAN BRADSHAW 1 CHRISTOPHER SWANISER 1 BEN CARSON 1 CHUCK NORRIS 1 BEN MARTIN JR 1 CHUCK REED 1 WRITE-IN Summary Report (All Candidates)
    [Show full text]
  • Expedition Strategies with Two Wins
    For Immediate Release Contact: May 19, 2016 Jack Roos (952) 215-1722 [email protected] DEMOCRATIC POLLSTER PETE BRODNITZ LAUNCHES NEW FIRM EXPEDITION STRATEGIES WITH TWO WINS Dominican Republic President Danilo Medina wins by an historic margin and Oregon Senator Wyden wins a comfortable Democratic primary victory WASHINGTON, D.C.— Former Benenson Strategy Group Partner Pete Brodnitz opened a new strategic polling shop – Expedition Strategies – this week with wins in the Dominican Republic with the re-election of President Danilo Medina and in Oregon for U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, who secured 83% of the vote in his Democratic primary. “There is enormous uncertainty among voters worldwide due to ongoing challenges related to demographic shifts, economic turbulence and and a breakdown in people’s relationship with institutions at all levels. When you couple those forces with the challenges posed by changing media consumption habits, understanding how to communicate effectively with voters is crucial,” said Pete Brodnitz, Expedition Strategies President and CEO. “We are excited to offer Democratic campaigns in the U.S. and throughout the world polling that is grounded in communications research and behavioral psychology. Our research is tailor-made to drive the development of effective campaign messages. Expedition Strategies acts as a partner in the campaigns we serve so we can help leaders achieve their governing and political goals.” Prior to opening Expedition, Mr. Brodnitz was a Partner at Benenson Strategy Group where his clients included almost all of the firm’s political candidate clients, including thirteen heads of State and government worldwide, senators, governors, members of Congress, state legislators and local elected leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subprime Lending Disaster and the Threat to the Broader Economy
    S. HRG. 110–250 EVOLUTION OF AN ECONOMIC CRISIS?: THE SUBPRIME LENDING DISASTER AND THE THREAT TO THE BROADER ECONOMY HEARING BEFORE THE JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 Printed for the use of the Joint Economic Committee ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 38–426 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:50 Jan 22, 2008 Jkt 038426 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\JEC\38426.TXT CELINA PsN: CELINA JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE [Created pursuant to Sec. 5(a) of Public Law 304, 79th Congress] SENATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York, Chairman CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York, Vice Chair EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico BARON P. HILL, Indiana AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota LORETTA SANCHEZ, California ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JIM WEBB, Virginia LLOYD DOGGETT, Texas SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JIM SAXTON, New Jersey, Ranking Minority JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire KEVIN BRADY, Texas JIM DEMINT, South Carolina PHIL ENGLISH, Pennsylvania ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah RON PAUL, Texas MICHAEL LASKAWY, Executive Director CHRISTOPHER J. FRENZE, Republican Staff Director (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:50 Jan 22, 2008 Jkt 038426 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\JEC\38426.TXT CELINA PsN: CELINA C O N T E N T S OPENING STATEMENT OF MEMBERS Hon.
    [Show full text]