Florida State University Libraries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Florida State University Libraries Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2017 Fossil Excavation, Museums, and Wyoming: American Paleontology, 1870-1915 Marlena Briane Cameron Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES FOSSIL EXCAVATION, MUSEUMS, AND WYOMING: AMERICAN PALEONTOLOGY, 1870-1915 By MARLENA BRIANE CAMERON A Thesis submitted to the Program in the History and Philosophy of Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2017 Marlena Cameron defended this thesis on July 17, 2017. The members of the supervisory committee were: Ronald E. Doel Professor Directing Thesis Michael Ruse Committee Member Kristina Buhrman Committee Member Sandra Varry Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the thesis has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iv Abstract ............................................................................................................................................v 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 2. THE BONE WARS ....................................................................................................................9 3. MUSEUM WARS .....................................................................................................................22 4. LOCAL PEACE AND VALUES: THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING MUSEUM ............41 5. CONCLUSION .........................................................................................................................55 APPENDIX: IMAGES ..................................................................................................................59 References ......................................................................................................................................67 Biographical Sketch .......................................................................................................................71 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: 1899 Fossil Fields Expedition Participants ....................................................................59 Figure 2: William Harlow Reed and Assistants Around a Titanothere Mount..............................59 Figure 3: “Megalnosaur paddle – about 1897 – Prof. B. C. Buffum” ...........................................60 Figure 4: Carnegie Museum’s Fossil Preparation Room ...............................................................60 Figure 5: “Bone Room – Mechanic Arts Bldg – 1897” .................................................................61 Figure 6: “Bone Room (Mechanic Arts Bldg) – About 1898” ......................................................61 Figure 7: “Bone Room - Mechanic Arts Bldg – 1899” .................................................................62 Figure 8: “Bone Room – In Mechanic Arts Bldg – 1897. W. H. Reed” .......................................62 Figure 9: “Elmer Riggs with Preparator in Field Museum’s Fossil Preparation Room, 1900 ......63 Figure 10: “Museum Room – ‘in Old Main’ – About 1895” ........................................................63 Figure 11: “Museum Scene U. of Wyo. Winter 1906-1907” ........................................................64 Figure 12: “Museum, 1908. W. H. Reed.” ....................................................................................64 Figure 13: American Museum with First Dinosaur Mount ( Brontosaurus ) on Display, 1905......65 Figure 14: Carnegie Museum with Diplodocus Mount on Display, 1907 .....................................65 Figure 15: American Museum Titanothere Models on Display, Circa 1900 .................................66 iv ABSTRACT Displays of dinosaurs have become a staple of modern natural history museums, but these did not emerge until the turn of the twentieth century. Through the work of Edward Drinker Cope and Othniel Charles Marsh in this field (despite their intense rivalry), paleontology grew as a discipline and, after losing federal funding, found a new home in museums and universities. Recognizing the potential of large dinosaurs for display and education, major natural history museums such as the American Museum of Natural History in New York under Henry Osborn began competing for their own specimens. Much work has been done on the efforts of these emerging large museums. Smaller museums such as the University of Wyoming Museum, however, have been much less studied. Through its proximity to immense, rich fossil fields, the university became directly connected to the major events shaping paleontology at the time. Yet differences in the pedagogy and intentions behind its formation—a sense of state pride rather than the concerns of wealthy, elite sponsors—served to set it apart from larger, more well-known institutions. v CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Dinosaurs. Large reptile-like behemoths towering above even the largest of modern terrestrial animals, their bones at an unprecedented scale. Not all dinosaurs reached such a large size, but even so, the sheer range of their body sizes, types, and structures have awed scientists and the general public alike. Proof of their popularity extends from being a quintessential staple of the stereotypical museum to a strong presence in pop culture. In science, work continues to be done not just on the fossil record and its role in evolution and earth’s history, but also the morphology, diet, and behavior of dinosaurs—even coloration. 1 Dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures, however, have not always been in the forefront of public consciousness. Georges Cuvier’s proof of extinction to scientific communities in 1796, notions of geologic time and uniformitarianism appearing in the mid-1800s, and the publication of Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection in 1859 constituted crucial changes to scientific thinking and the analysis of fossils and their implications. This was not to say that fossils had gone unnoticed beforehand. The ancient Greeks had noted parallels between fossils and extant organisms, while the concept of griffins from Greek and Roman legends, incorporated from Saca-Scythian nomads, are thought to have been inspired by the remains of Protoceratops and Psittacosaurus .2 In North America, fossils functioned as symbolic objects and folklore in Native American culture. This ranged from “Plains Indians [gathering] certain iridescent marine fossils for their magical power to summon buffalo 1 Chris Sloan, “Dinosaur True Colors Revealed for First Time,” National Geographic , January 27, 2010. 2 Adrienne Mayor, The First Fossil Hunters: Paleontology in Greek and Roman Times (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), 8-9; 22; 40-49. 1 herds…[to] Sioux myths about Thunder Birds fighting Water Monsters.” 3 Meanwhile, ivory from mastodon tusks was “actively collected and traded,” while “the mounds built by paleo- Indians in Ohio also contain pieces of fossilized ivory tusks collected more than two thousand years ago.” 4 The 1700s and especially the late 1800s, however, brought with them a focus on collecting fossils specifically for the purpose of studying earth’s history, geology, and paleobiology. The work of Englishwoman Mary Anning in the early 1800s demonstrated these efforts: continuing her father’s work in gathering fossils, she actively collected them from the nearby Jurassic-period cliffs, including the discovery she and her brother made of Ichthyosaurus and “her [own] discovery of the first plesiosaur.” 5 Her fossils found their way to the collections of noblemen, museums, and naturalists, including Georges Cuvier, aiding the discourse on fossils and inspiring artwork of prehistoric creatures and their habitats. The growing popularity of the prehistoric also became reflected in Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins’ sculptures of prehistoric creatures for the Crystal Palace in England in 1854, tapping into the ‘‘monstrous aesthetic.’” 6 Paleontology in the United States, meanwhile, took off in the mid-1800s. The work of Joseph Leidy at the Academy of Natural Sciences proved especially influential, while the infamous “Bone Wars” feud of Edward Drinker Cope and Othniel Charles Marsh propelled the growth of the discipline. Driven by deep personal animosity and rivalry, the two raced to 3 Adrienne Mayor, Fossil Legends of the First Americans (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), xxiii. 4 Ibid., 9. 5 “Mary Anning (1799-1847),” University of California Museum of Paleontology , accessed April 30, 2017, http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/anning.html 6 Mark Jaffe, The Gilded Dinosaur: The Fossil War Between E.D. Cope and O.C. Marsh and the Rise of American Science (New York: New York University Press, 2000), 15; Paul D. Brinkman, The Second Jurassic Dinosaur Rush: Museums and Paleontology in America at the Turn of the Twentieth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010), 248. 2 discover and name the most fossils, attacked each other in print, endeavored to hire each other’s fossil collectors, and, more so in Marsh’s case, ordered the destruction of sites to prevent their use by others. Yet with the means to engage in continuous fossil hunting
Recommended publications
  • Dinosaur Wars Program Transcript
    Page 1 Dinosaur Wars Program Transcript Narrator: For more than a century, Americans have had a love affair with dinosaurs. Extinct for millions of years, they were barely known until giant, fossil bones were discovered in the mid-nineteenth century. Two American scientists, Edward Drinker Cope and Othniel Charles Marsh, led the way to many of these discoveries, at the forefront of the young field of paleontology. Jacques Gauthier, Paleontologist: Every iconic dinosaur every kid grows up with, apatosaurus, triceratops, stegosaurus, allosaurus, these guys went out into the American West and they found that stuff. Narrator: Cope and Marsh shed light on the deep past in a way no one had ever been able to do before. They unearthed more than 130 dinosaur species and some of the first fossil evidence supporting Darwin’s new theory of evolution. Mark Jaffe, Writer: Unfortunately there was a more sordid element, too, which was their insatiable hatred for each other, which often just baffled and exasperated everyone around them. Peter Dodson, Paleontologist: They began life as friends. Then things unraveled… and unraveled in quite a spectacular way. Narrator: Cope and Marsh locked horns for decades, in one of the most bitter scientific rivalries in American history. Constantly vying for leadership in their young field, they competed ruthlessly to secure gigantic bones in the American West. They put American science on the world stage and nearly destroyed one another in the process. Page 2 In the summer of 1868, a small group of scientists boarded a Union Pacific train for a sightseeing excursion through the heart of the newly-opened American West.
    [Show full text]
  • Science, Sovereignty, and the Sacred Text: Paleontological Resources and Native American Rights Allison M
    Maryland Law Review Volume 55 | Issue 1 Article 5 Science, Sovereignty, and the Sacred Text: Paleontological Resources and Native American Rights Allison M. Dussias Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation Allison M. Dussias, Science, Sovereignty, and the Sacred Text: Paleontological Resources and Native American Rights, 55 Md. L. Rev. 84 (1996) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol55/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCIENCE, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE SACRED TEXT: PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS ALLISON M. DussIAs* Land is the only thing in the world that amounts to anything... for 'tis the only thing in this world that lasts.... 'Tis the only thing worth working for, worth fightingfor-worth dying for.' -Gone with the Wind You have driven away our game and our means of livelihood out of the country, until now we have nothing left that is valuable except the hills that you ask us to give up.... The earth is full of minerals of all kinds, and on the earth the ground is covered with forests of heavy pine, and when we give these up to the Great Father we know that we give up the last thing that is valuable either to us or the white people.2 -Wanigi Ska (White Ghost) We believe that at the beginning of all things, when the earth was young, the thunderbirds were giants.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Mesozoic
    DEBRA LINDSAY THE MESOZOIC/DEFINING DISCIPLINES: LATE NINETEENTH- CENTURY DEBATES OVER THE JURASSIC–CRETACEOUS BOUNDARY DEBRA LINDSAY Department of History and Politics University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada E2L 4L5 [email protected] ABSTRACT The last two decades of the nineteenth century were exciting times in American paleontology, with disputes over Jurassic dinosaurs between Edward Drinker Cope and Othniel Charles Marsh appearing in the press. Less well known is the dispute over defining the Mesozoic that began in 1888 when Marsh invited Lester Frank Ward, a colleague with whom he had been working on the Potomac Formation for the United States Geological Survey, to speak on the plant fossils found there. Initially agreeing with Marsh that the Potomac was a Jurassic formation, work on fossil cycads led Ward to conclude that the Potomac was Lower Cretaceous. As Ward and Marsh grappled with the question of how to determine the age and identity of Mesozoic systems, they joined other paleontologists and Earth Sciences History geologists such as William J. McGee, Albert Charles Seward, and Samuel W. Williston in 2011, Vol. 30, No. 2 a debate that often reflected scientific training and sub-specializations as much as pp. 216–239 stratigraphic principles, becoming caught up in a trans-Atlantic dispute in which their reputations were on the line as they claimed that ‘their’ fossils were key determinants of Mesozoic systems. In the end, Marsh’s reputation as a paleontologist was far better established than that of Ward, who moved on to another career as a sociologist at Brown University, but cycad discoveries from Maryland, Colorado and Wyoming, and fieldwork, trumped laboratory studies—even when performed by a master systematist—as the Potomac Formation proved to be Lower Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • George P. Merrill Collection, Circa 1800-1930 and Undated
    George P. Merrill Collection, circa 1800-1930 and undated Finding aid prepared by Smithsonian Institution Archives Smithsonian Institution Archives Washington, D.C. Contact us at [email protected] Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Historical Note.................................................................................................................. 1 Descriptive Entry.............................................................................................................. 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series 1: PHOTOGRAPHS, CORRESPONDENCE AND RELATED MATERIAL CONCERNING INDIVIDUAL GEOLOGISTS AND SCIENTISTS, CIRCA 1800-1920................................................................................................................. 4 Series 2: PHOTOGRAPHS OF GROUPS OF GEOLOGISTS, SCIENTISTS AND SMITHSONIAN STAFF, CIRCA 1860-1930........................................................... 30 Series 3: PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL SURVEY OF THE TERRITORIES (HAYDEN SURVEYS), CIRCA 1871-1877..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Fighting Pair
    THE FIGHTING PAIR ALLOSAURUS VS STEGOSAURUS — Allosaurus “jimmadsoni” and Hesperosaurus (Stegosaurus) mjosi Upper Jurassic Period, Kimmeridgian Stage, 155 million years old Morrison Formation Dana Quarry, Ten Sleep, Washakie County, Wyoming, USA. THE ALLOSAURUS The Official State Fossil of Utah, the Allosaurus was a large theropod carnosaur of the “bird-hipped” Saurischia order that flourished primarily in North America during the Upper Jurassic Period, 155-145 million years In the spring of 2007, at the newly-investigated Dana Quarry in the Morrison Formation of Wyoming, the team from ago. Long recognized in popular culture, it bears the distinction of being Dinosauria International LLC made an exciting discovery: the beautifully preserved femur of the giant carnivorous one of the first dinosaurs to be depicted on the silver screen, the apex Allosaur. As they kept digging, their excitement grew greater; next came toe bones, leg bones, ribs, vertebrae and predator of the 1912 novel and 1925 cinema adaptation of Conan Doyle’s finally a skull: complete, undistorted and, remarkably, with full dentition. It was an incredible find; one of the most The Lost World. classic dinosaurs, virtually complete, articulated and in beautiful condition. But that was not all. When the team got The Allosaurus possessed a large head on a short neck, a broad rib-cage the field jackets back to the preparation lab, they discovered another leg bone beneath the Allosaurus skull… There creating a barrel chest, small three-fingered forelimbs, large powerful hind limbs with hoof-like feet, and a long heavy tail to act as a counter-balance. was another dinosaur in the 150 million year-old rock.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dinosaurs of North America
    FEOM THE SIXTEENTH ANNUAL KEPOKT OF THE U. S, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THE DINOSAURS OF NORTH AMERICA OTHNIEL CHARLES MARSH TALE UNIVERSITY WASHINGTON 1896 ^33/^, I/BRAKt 4 ,\ . THE DINOSAURS OF NORTH AMERICA. BY OTHNIEL CHARLES MARSH. 133 CONTENTS. Pajje. Introduction 143 Part I. —Triassic dinosaurs 146 Theropoda 146 Anchisaurida? 147 Anchisaurus 147 The skull 148 The fore limbs 149 The hind limbs 149 Anchisaurus solus 149 Amniosaurus rTT 150 Eestoration of Anchisaurus 150 Dinosaurian footprints 151 Distribution of Triassic dinosaurs 152 Part II. —Jurassic dinosaurs 152 Theropoda : 153 Hallopus 153 Fore and hind limbs 154 Coelurus _ 155 The vertebra:- 155 The hind limbs 156 Ceratosaurus 156 The skull 157 The brain 159 The lower iaws 159 The vertebra: 159 The scapular arch 160 The pelvic arch 160 The metatarsals 162 Eestoration of Ceratosaurus 163 Allosaurus 163 European Theropoda 163 Sauropoda 164 Atlantosaurus beds 164 Families of Sauropoda 165 Atlantosauridie 166 Atlantosaurus 166 Apatosaurus 166 The sacral cavity 166 The vertebra- 167 Brontosaurus 168 The scapular arch 168 The cervical vertebra.- 169 The dorsal vertebree 169 The sacrum 170 The caudal vertebra- 171 The pelric arch 172 The fore limbs 173 The hind limbs 173 135 136 CONTENTS. Part II. —Jurassic dinosaurs—Continued. Page. Sauropoda—Continued. Atlantosaurida? —Continued. Restoration of Brontosaurus 173 Barnsaurus 174 Diplodoeida? 175 Diplodocus 175 The skull 175 The brain 178 The lower jaws 178 The teeth 179 The vertebra; 180 The sternal bones 180 The pelvic girdle 180 Size and habits 180 Morosaurida? 181 Morosaurus 181 The skull 181 The vertebra? 181 The fore limbs 182 The pelvis 182 The hind limbs 183 Pleuroccelida? : 183 Pleurocoelus 183 The skull 183 The vertebras 183 Distribution of the Sauropoda 185 Comparison with European forms 185 Predentata ».
    [Show full text]
  • During the 19Th Century, While Many Americans Went West to Nd Gold, Othniel Charles Marsh Went West to Nd Dinosaurs
    During the 19th century, while many Americans went west to nd gold, Othniel Charles Marsh went west to nd dinosaurs. He struck it rich for everyone interested in the history of life on Earth. Othniel Charles Marsh was born in Lockport, Niagara County, on October 29, 1831. The Marshes were small farmers, but Othniel’s uncle on his mother’s side was George Peabody, a wealthy banker and the “father of American philanthropy.” After Othniel’s mother died when he was three, Peabody managed her estate so Othniel would get a generous inheritance when he turned 21. Marsh used the money to enroll in the Phillips Andover Academy, where an interest in minerals became a passion for collecting fossils – the remains of ancient life in mineral form. Peabody later paid Marsh’s way through Yale. After graduating, Marsh Library of Congress, Prints and convinced Peabody to fund a natural history museum Photographs Division [reproduction at Yale and a professorship in paleontology – the study number LC-BH832-175] of ancient life. Paleontology had made rapid strides by the 1860s. Fossils con rmed that giant reptiles existed millions of years ago – the word “dinosaur” was only coined in 1831. Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection, published in 1859, helped scientists understand where fossils t in the history of evolution. Marsh met Darwin and other paleontologists during his advanced studies in Europe. After he took over the Yale professorship in 1866, he sought more pieces of the evolutionary puzzle in the vast American west. Between 1870 and 1873 Marsh led four expeditions in search of fossils.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Drinker Cope's Law of Acceleration of Growth [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Edward Drinker Cope's Law of Acceleration of Growth [1] By: Barnes, M. Elizabeth Keywords: orthogensis [2] The Law of Acceleration of Growth is a theory proposed by Edward Drinker Cope [3] in the US during the nineteenth century. Cope developed it in an attempt to explain the evolution [4] of genera by appealing to changes in the developmental timelines of organisms. Cope proposed this law as an additional theory to natural selection [5]. He argued that the evolution [4] of genera, the more general groups within which biologists group species, occurs when the individuals in a species move through developmental stages [6] faster than did their ancestors, but within the same fixed period ofg estation [7], and thus can undergo new developmental stages [6] and develop new traits. The Law of Acceleration compliments Cope's Law of Retardation of Growth. He described the later law as the process by which organisms revert to an ancestral stage. In these cases, forces suppress the most recent traits or stages common to the development of individuals from different species within the same genus. Cope described evolution [4] as progressive and following a predetermined path, a perspective about evolution [4] sometimes called orthogenetic. Cope's was one among many orthogenic theories in the second half of the nineteenth century. Furthermore, the theory was part of a trend in the nineteenth century in which some biologists claimed that the changes in developmental timing of organisms could explain large changes in biological forms throughout natural history [8].
    [Show full text]
  • Cope's Law of the Unspecialized, Cope's Rule, and Weak
    Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2013, 15: 747–756 Cope’s Law of the Unspecialized, Cope’s Rule, and weak directionality in evolution Pasquale Raia1 and Mikael Fortelius2 1Dipartamento di Scienze della Terra, Ambiente e Risorse, Università di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy and 2Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland and Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ABSTRACT Background: Edward Drinker Cope nurtured the idea that evolution moves by an inner motor towards the perfection of structures. This concept animated his major contributions to evolutionary theory, including the Law of the Unspecialized and the familiar Cope’s Rule. The former states that clades start with unspecialized forms and evolve towards specialized descendants eventually bound to become extinct because of their ‘overperfection’. Through time, the Law of the Unspecialized has been abandoned, probably because it is dominated by a concept of strong directionality (and the many distortions this concept entails). Questions: Is directionality in evolution real? If so, does the evidence contradict the Law of the Unspecialized, as is now commonly assumed? Procedure: We review the Law of the Unspecialized. Then we recast it in modern terms. We highlight the connection between Cope’s Rule and the Law of the Unspecialized. Conclusions: A form of weak directionality is real. We conclude that the concept of directionality has been unjustly deprecated. It is, in fact, a pervasive, important, and easily testable feature of evolution. Keywords: Cope’s Rule, Cope’s Law of the Unspecialized, weak directionality, body size, ecological specialization. INTRODUCTION What we understand today as Cope’s Rule is the tendency towards increasing body size in a lineage over geological time (Cope, 1887).
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the File GUTINDEX.ALL Updated to July 5, 2013
    This is the file GUTINDEX.ALL Updated to July 5, 2013 -=] INTRODUCTION [=- This catalog is a plain text compilation of our eBook files, as follows: GUTINDEX.2013 is a plain text listing of eBooks posted to the Project Gutenberg collection between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013 with eBook numbers starting at 41750. GUTINDEX.2012 is a plain text listing of eBooks posted to the Project Gutenberg collection between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012 with eBook numbers starting at 38460 and ending with 41749. GUTINDEX.2011 is a plain text listing of eBooks posted to the Project Gutenberg collection between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011 with eBook numbers starting at 34807 and ending with 38459. GUTINDEX.2010 is a plain text listing of eBooks posted to the Project Gutenberg collection between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010 with eBook numbers starting at 30822 and ending with 34806. GUTINDEX.2009 is a plain text listing of eBooks posted to the Project Gutenberg collection between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009 with eBook numbers starting at 27681 and ending with 30821. GUTINDEX.2008 is a plain text listing of eBooks posted to the Project Gutenberg collection between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008 with eBook numbers starting at 24098 and ending with 27680. GUTINDEX.2007 is a plain text listing of eBooks posted to the Project Gutenberg collection between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007 with eBook numbers starting at 20240 and ending with 24097. GUTINDEX.2006 is a plain text listing of eBooks posted to the Project Gutenberg collection between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006 with eBook numbers starting at 17438 and ending with 20239.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Drinker Cope Papers, 1859-1907 ANSP.Coll.328
    Edward Drinker Cope papers, 1859-1907 ANSP.Coll.328 This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit March 28, 2013 Describing Archives: A Content Standard Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia 2011.01.11 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway Philadelphia, PA, 19103 215-299-1075 [email protected] Edward Drinker Cope papers, 1859-1907 ANSP.Coll.328 Table of Contents Summary Information ................................................................................................................................. 3 Biographical/Historical note.......................................................................................................................... 4 Scope and Contents note............................................................................................................................... 5 Administrative Information .........................................................................................................................5 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Controlled Access Headings..........................................................................................................................6 Collection Inventory...................................................................................................................................... 7 A. Certificates and honors.......................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • The Nationality Rooms Program at the University of Pittsburgh (1926-1945)
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 6-2004 “Imagined Communities” in Showcases: The Nationality Rooms Program at The University of Pittsburgh (1926-1945) Lucia Curta Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Curta, Lucia, "“Imagined Communities” in Showcases: The Nationality Rooms Program at The University of Pittsburgh (1926-1945)" (2004). Dissertations. 1089. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/1089 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “IMAGINED COMMUNITIES” IN SHOWCASES: THE NATIONALITY ROOMS PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH (1926-1945) by Lucia Curta A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 2004 “IMAGINED COMMUNITIES” IN SHOWCASES: THE NATIONALITY ROOMS PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH (1926-1945) Lucia Curta, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2004 From the inception of the program in 1926, the Nationality Rooms at the University of Pittsburgh were viewed as apolitical in their iconography. Their purpose was
    [Show full text]