Jahresber. 05
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Non-Insect Arthropod Types in the ZFMK Collection, Bonn (Acari, Araneae, Scorpiones, Pantopoda, Amphipoda)
03_huber.qxd 01.12.2010 9:31 Uhr Seite 217 Bonn zoological Bulletin Volume 58 pp. 217–226 Bonn, November 2010 Non-insect arthropod types in the ZFMK collection, Bonn (Acari, Araneae, Scorpiones, Pantopoda, Amphipoda) Bernhard A. Huber & Stefanie Lankhorst Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The type specimens of Acari, Araneae, Scorpiones, Pantopoda, and Amphipoda housed in the Alexander Koenig Zoological Research Museum, Bonn, are listed. 183 names are recorded; of these, 64 (35%) are represented by name bearing (i.e., primary) types. Specific and subspecific names are listed alphabetically, followed by the original genus name, bibliographic citation, present combination (as far as known to the authors), and emended label data. Key Words. Type specimens, Acari, Araneae, Scorpiones, Pantopoda, Amphipoda, Bonn. INTRODUCTION The ZFMK in Bonn has a relatively small collection of Abbreviations. HT: holotype, PT: paratype, ST: syntype, non-insect arthropods, with an emphasis on arachnids LT: lectotype, PLT: paralectotype; n, pn, dn, tn: (proto-, (mostly mites, spiders, and scorpions), sea spiders (Pan- deuto-, trito-) nymph, hy: hypopus, L: larva topoda) and amphipods. Other arachnid and crustacean or- ders are represented, but not by type material. A small part of the material goes back to the founder of the museum, ACARI Alexander Koenig, and was collected around 1910. Most Acari were deposited at the museum by F. S. Lukoschus aequatorialis [Orycteroxenus] Lukoschus, Gerrits & (mostly Astigmata: Glyciphagidae, Atopomelidae, etc.), Fain, 1977b. PT, 2 slides. CONGO REP.: Mt de Braz- Pantopoda by F. Krapp (Mediterranean, Weddell Seas), za (near Brazzaville), host: Crocidura aequatorialis, and Amphipoda by G. -
Aranhas (Araneae, Arachnida) Do Estado De São Paulo, Brasil: Diversidade, Esforço Amostral E Estado Do Conhecimento
Biota Neotrop., vol. 11(Supl.1) Aranhas (Araneae, Arachnida) do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil: diversidade, esforço amostral e estado do conhecimento Antonio Domingos Brescovit1,4, Ubirajara de Oliveira2,3 & Adalberto José dos Santos2 1Laboratório de Artrópodes, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, n. 1500, CEP 05503-900, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, e-mail: [email protected] 2Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG, Av. Antonio Carlos, n. 6627, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG 4Autor para correspondência: Antonio Domingos Brescovit, e-mail: [email protected] BRESCOVIT, A.D., OLIVEIRA, U. & SANTOS, A.J. Spiders (Araneae, Arachnida) from São Paulo State, Brazil: diversity, sampling efforts, and state-of-art. Biota Neotrop. 11(1a): http://www.biotaneotropica.org. br/v11n1a/en/abstract?inventory+bn0381101a2011. Abstract: In this study we present a database of spiders described and registered from the Neotropical region between 1757 and 2008. Results are focused on the diversity of the group in the State of São Paulo, compared to other Brazilian states. Data was compiled from over 25,000 records, published in scientific papers dealing with Neotropical fauna. These records enabled the evaluation of the current distribution of the species, the definition of collection gaps and priority biomes, and even future areas of endemism for Brazil. A total of 875 species, distributed in 50 families, have been described from the State of São Paulo. -
September 1948, in Banjul. in Day Trip British Dragonfly Society Applied
98 Notul. Vol. 4, No, 6, odonatoi, pp. 93-108, December 1, 1995 Dragonflies recorded from The Gambia ¹ R.M. Gambles [deceased], N.W. Moore M. Hämäläinen² and E.D .V. Prendergast³ 1 The Farm House, 117 Boxworth End, Swavesey, Cambridge CB4 5RA, United Kingdom 2 Department ofApplied Zoology, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 3 Manor House, Bagber, Sturminster Newton, Dorset DT10 2EY, United Kingdom Abstract – - 64 recorded from The Gambia in all of the spp. ably by systematic collecting parts end 1989 and their known distri- and all times of it stands up to are listed, country at year; but, as bution shown. at present, it should put our knowledge of the Gambian Odonata at least on a par with that of Introduction most other West African Territories. The Gambia is a narrow strip ofterritory bounded on all sides, except for its Atlantic coastline,by Collecting Visits and Senegal, consists of little more than the river, NWM spent two months, from mid-July to mid- which somewhat pursues a meandering course September 1948, in The Gambia collecting it from east to west; and the land oneither side of mainly around Kuntaur, some 200 km up-river, 20 the to an average distance of km near mouth, but also around Banjul and Basse Santa Su. In narrowing to 10 km up-river. The groundis, for September 1958, RMG was able to land from the he for the most part, flat, and there are hardly any tribu- mail boat on which was travelling, about to It taries the river. -
Addenda to the Insect Fauna of Al-Baha Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with Zoogeographical Notes Magdi S
JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY, 2016 VOL. 50, NOS. 19–20, 1209–1236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1103913 Addenda to the insect fauna of Al-Baha Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with zoogeographical notes Magdi S. El-Hawagrya,c, Mostafa R. Sharafb, Hathal M. Al Dhaferb, Hassan H. Fadlb and Abdulrahman S. Aldawoodb aEntomology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt; bPlant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; cSurvey and Classification of Agricultural and Medical Insects in Al-Baha Province, Al-Baha University, Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The first list of insects (Arthropoda: Hexapoda) of Al-Baha Received 1 April 2015 Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) was published in 2013 Accepted 30 September 2015 and contained a total of 582 species. In the present study, 142 Online 9 December 2015 species belonging to 51 families and representing seven orders KEYWORDS are added to the fauna of Al-Baha Province, bringing the total Palaearctic; Afrotropical; number of species now recorded from the province to 724. The Eremic; insect species; reported species are assigned to recognized regional zoogeogra- Arabian Peninsula; Tihama; phical regions. Seventeen of the species are recorded for the first Al-Sarah; Al-Sarawat time for KSA, namely: Platypleura arabica Myers [Cicadidae, Mountains Hemiptera]; Cletomorpha sp.; Gonocerus juniperi Herrich-Schäffer [Coreidae, Hemiptera]; Coranus lateritius (Stål); Rhynocoris bipus- tulatus (Fieber) [Reduviidae, Hemiptera]; Cantacader iranicus Lis; Dictyla poecilla Drake & Hill [Tingidae, Hemiptera]; Mantispa scab- ricollis McLachlan [Mantispidae, Neuroptera]; Cerocoma schreberi Fabricius [Meloidae, Coleoptera]; Platypus parallelus (Fabricius) [Curculionidae, Coleoptera]; Zodion cinereum (Fabricius) [Conopidae, Diptera]; Ulidia ?ruficeps Becker [Ulidiidae, Diptera]; Atherigona reversura Villeneuve [Muscidae, Diptera]; Aplomya metallica (Wiedemann); Cylindromyia sp. -
(Arachnida: Araneae) of the Floodplain Forests of the Main Amazon River Channel
ARTÍCULO: A contribution to the knowledge of the spider fauna (Arachnida: Araneae) of the floodplain forests of the main Amazon River channel Felipe N. A. A. Rego, Eduardo M. Venticinque, Antonio D. Brescovit, Cristina A. Rheims & Ana L. K. M. Albernaz Abstract: ARTÍCULO: We collected spiders during an expedition along 3000 km of the floodplains of the Brazilian part of the main channel of the Amazon River and identified them A contribution to the knowledge of to family, genus and species / morphospecies level whenever possible. More the spider fauna (Arachnida: Ara- than half of the collected species represented new records. The percentage of neae) of the floodplain forests of the singletons (35.6%) and doubletons (17.4%), the lack of overlapping between main Amazon River channel the data obtained in this study and that of the literature, and the under sampling Felipe N. A. A. Rego emphasizes the need for more inventories in the Amazon River floodplain and Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Univer- a more complete set of sampling methods, such as canopy fogging and pitfall sidade de Brasília, 70919-970, Brasí- trapping. Therefore, knowledge on the fauna of the Amazon floodplains will lia, DF, Brazil. [email protected] remain an enormous challenge, regarding the still superficial collecting efforts, Eduardo M. Venticinque the lack of long-term samplings, taxonomic knowledge and capacity. Wildlife Conser. Soc., Rua dos Jato- Key words: Arachnida, Araneae, spiders, inventory, Amazon River, várzea, Amazo- bás, 274, Coroado 3, 69085-000 and nia. INPA, 69011-970, C.P. 478, Manaus, AM, Brazil. [email protected] A. D. -
Mimicry - Ecology - Oxford Bibliographies 12/13/12 7:29 PM
Mimicry - Ecology - Oxford Bibliographies 12/13/12 7:29 PM Mimicry David W. Kikuchi, David W. Pfennig Introduction Among nature’s most exquisite adaptations are examples in which natural selection has favored a species (the mimic) to resemble a second, often unrelated species (the model) because it confuses a third species (the receiver). For example, the individual members of a nontoxic species that happen to resemble a toxic species may dupe any predators by behaving as if they are also dangerous and should therefore be avoided. In this way, adaptive resemblances can evolve via natural selection. When this phenomenon—dubbed “mimicry”—was first outlined by Henry Walter Bates in the middle of the 19th century, its intuitive appeal was so great that Charles Darwin immediately seized upon it as one of the finest examples of evolution by means of natural selection. Even today, mimicry is often used as a prime example in textbooks and in the popular press as a superlative example of natural selection’s efficacy. Moreover, mimicry remains an active area of research, and studies of mimicry have helped illuminate such diverse topics as how novel, complex traits arise; how new species form; and how animals make complex decisions. General Overviews Since Henry Walter Bates first published his theories of mimicry in 1862 (see Bates 1862, cited under Historical Background), there have been periodic reviews of our knowledge in the subject area. Cott 1940 was mainly concerned with animal coloration. Subsequent reviews, such as Edmunds 1974 and Ruxton, et al. 2004, have focused on types of mimicry associated with defense from predators. -
Chronik Des Akademischen Jahres 2005/2006
CHRONIK DES AKADEMISCHEN JAHRES 2005/2006 Chronik des Akademischen Jahres 2005/2006 herausgegeben vom Rektor der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms- Universität Bonn, Prof. Dr. Matthias Winiger, Bonn 2006. Redaktion: Jens Müller, Archiv der Universität Bonn Herstellung: Druckerei der Universität Bonn MATTHIAS WINIGER RHEINISCHE FRIEDRICH-WILHELMS-UNIVERSITÄT BONN Chronik des Akademischen Jahres 2005/06 Bonn 2006 Jahrgang 121 Neue Folge Jahrgang 110 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Rede des Rektors zur Eröffnung des Akademischen Jahres Rückblick auf das Akademische Jahr 2005/06 .....S. 9 Preisverleihungen und Ehrungen Preisverleihungen und Ehrungen im Akademischen Jahr 2005/06 ...........................S. 23 Akademischer Festvortrag Wilhelm Barthlott, Biodiversität als Herausforderung und Chance.................................S. 25 Chronik des Akademischen Jahres Das Akademische Jahr 2005/06 in Pressemeldungen..............................................S. 40 Nachrufe ......................................................................S. 54 Berichte aus den Fakultäten Evangelisch-Theologische Fakultät ....................S. 67 Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät ......................S. 74 Rechts- und Staatswissenschaftliche Fakultät S. 83 Medizinische Fakultät ............................................S. 103 Philosophische Fakultät .........................................S. 134 Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät.......S. 170 Landwirtschaftliche Fakultät ..................................S. 206 Beitrag zur Universitätsgeschichte Thomas Becker, -
Jahresber. 05
museumFORSCHUNGS KOENIG JAHRES BERICHT 2006 ZOOLOGISCHES FORSCHUNGSMUSEUM ALEXANDER KOENIG www.zfmk.de JAHRESBERICHT 2006 INHALT 1 GRUSSWORT DES DIREKTORS 1 1 Bericht über die Evaluierung 3 2 2 AUS DER AKTUELLEN ARBEIT 3 2 Die Opisthobranchia - Forschung an einer facettenreichen Schneckengruppe 3 2 BIOTA Ostafrika - Biodiversitätsforschung in Afrika - Forschung für den Menschen 9 Zugvogelforschung mit Weltraumtechnologie 13 2 1 FORSCHUNG AM ZFMK 17 1.1 Forschungsprojekte (tabellarisch) 17 1.2 Kongresse, Vorträge und Forschungsreisen 23 1.2.1 Kongresse 23 1.2.2 Auswärtige Vorträge 25 1.2.3 Forschungsreisen 28 1.3 Drittmitteleinwerbungen 30 1.4 Kooperationen 33 1.5 Weitere wissenschaftliche Aktivitäten 38 1.5.1 Zeitschriften und Buchprojekte 38 1.5.2 Gremien- und Gutachtertätigkeit 40 1.6 Gastwissenschaftler 45 1.6.1 Gastwissenschaftler im Portrait 45 1.6.2 Gastwissenschaftler (tabellarisch) 46 2 SAMMLUNGEN UND BIBLIOTHEKEN 49 2.1 Sammlungszugänge 2006 49 2.1.1 Besondere Sammlungszugänge 49 2.2.2 Sammlungszugänge (tabellarisch) 51 2.2 Bibliothek 52 3 LEHRE 55 3.1 Vorlesungen, Seminare, Praktika 55 3.2 Kandidatenbetreuung 56 3.2.1 Laufende Arbeiten 56 3.2.2 Abgeschlossene Arbeiten 59 3.3 Evolutionsbiologisches Kolloquium - Vorträge 2006 61 JAHRESBERICHT 2006 4 ÖFFENTLICHKEITSARBEIT 63 4.1 Ausstellungswesen 63 4.1.1 Dauerausstellung 63 4.1.2 Sonderausstellungen 64 4.2 Veranstaltungen 2006 66 4.2.1 Museumsmeilenfest 66 4.2.2 Winterabendvorträge 67 4.2.3 Weitere Veranstaltungen 68 4.3 Museumspädagogik 70 4.3.1 Museumspädagogische Programme -
Odonata of the Kruger National Park
BIODIVERSITY OBSERVATIONS RESEARCH PAPER (CITIZEN SCIENCE) Odonata of the Kruger National Park Author(s): Journal editor: Underhill LG, Loftie-Eaton M and Pete Laver Navarro R Manuscript editor: Pete Laver Received: September 9, 2018; Accepted: November 13, 2018; Published: November 13, 2018 Citation: Underhill LG, Loftie-Eaton M and Navarro R. 2018. Odonata of the Kruger National Park. Biodiversity Observations 9.11:1-16 Journal: https://journals.uct.ac.za/index.php/BO/ Manuscript: https://journals.uct.ac.za/index.php/BO/article/view/634 PDF: https://journals.uct.ac.za/index.php/BO/article/view/634/563 HTML: http://thebdi.org/blog/2018/11/13/odonata-of-the-kruger-national-park Biodiversity Observations is an open access electronic journal published by the Animal Demography Unit at the University of Cape Town, available at https://journals.uct.ac.za/index.php/BO/ The scope of Biodiversity Observations includes papers describing observations about biodiversity in general, including animals, plants, algae and fungi. This includes observations of behaviour, breeding and flowering patterns, distributions and range extensions, foraging, food, movement, measurements, habitat and colouration/plumage variations. Biotic interactions such as pollination, fruit dispersal, herbivory and predation fall within the scope, as well as the use of indigenous and exotic species by humans. Observations of naturalised plants and animals will also be considered. Biodiversity Observations will also publish a variety of other interesting or relevant biodiversity material: reports of projects and conferences, annotated checklists for a site or region, specialist bibliographies, book reviews and any other appropriate material. Further details and guidelines to authors are on the journal website (https://journals.uct.ac.za/index.php/BO/). -
Current Provisional List – (
GAMBIAN DRAGONFLIES – CURRENT PROVISIONAL LIST – (www.dragonflyprime.co.uk) RECORDED NAME CURRENT NAME ENGLISH NAME PRE 1980 * 1996 ** *** 2013 -2017 ZYGOPTERA LESTES 1 Lestes ictericus Lestes ictericus Tawny Spreadwing x 2 Lestes ochraceus Lestes ochraceus Ochre Spreadwing x X 3 Lestes pallidus Lestes pallidus Pallid Spreadwing x X x ELATTONEURA 4 Elattoneura nigra Elattoneura nigra Black Threadtail x X MESOCNEMIS 5 Mesocnemis dupuyi Mesocnemis dupuyi Gambia Riverjack x X COPERA 6 Platycnemis congolensis Copera nyansana Eastern Featherleg x X 7 Platycnemis sikassoensis Copera sikassoensis Little Featherleg x X ACIAGRION 8 Aciagrion attenuatum Aciagrion gracile Graceful Slim x X AGRIOCNEMIS 9 Agriocnemis exilis Agriocnemis exilis Little Wisp x X x 10 Agriocnemis maclachani Agriocnemis maclachani Forest Wisp x X 11 Agriocnemis victoria Agriocnemis victoria Lesser Pincer-tailed Wisp x X 12 Agriocnemis zerafica Agriocnemis zerafica Sahel Wisp x X x AZUAGRION 13 Enallagma vansomereni Azuagrion vansomerini Tiny Bluet x X x CERIAGRION 14 Ceriagrion glabrum Ceriagrion glabrum Common Citril x X x 15 Ceriagrion moorei Ceriagrion suave Suave Citril x X x ISCHNURA 16 Ischnura senegalensis Ischnura senegalensis Tropical Bluetail x x PSEUDAGRION 17 Pseudagrion angelicum Pseudagrion camerunense Orange-faced Sprite x X x 18 Pseudagrion glaucescens Pseudagrion glaucescens Blue-green Sprite X 19 Pseudagrion hamoni Pseudagrion hamoni Swarthy Sprite x X x 20 Pseudagrion nubicum Pseudagrion nubicum Bluetail Sprite x X 21 Pseudagrion sjoestedti nigeriense -
Bromeliads As Biodiversity Amplifiers and Habitat Segregation of Spider Communities in a Neotropical Rainforest
2010. The Journal of Arachnology 38:270–279 Bromeliads as biodiversity amplifiers and habitat segregation of spider communities in a Neotropical rainforest Thiago Gonc¸alves-Souza1, Antonio D. Brescovit2, Denise de C. Rossa-Feres1,andGustavo Q. Romero1,3: 1Departamento de Zoologia e Botaˆnica, IBILCE, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Rua Cristo´va˜o Colombo 2265, CEP 15054- 000, Sa˜o Jose´ do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil; 2Instituto Butanta˜, Laborato´rio de Artro´podes Pec¸onhentos, Avenida Vital Brazil 1500, CEP 05503-900, Sa˜o Paulo, SP, Brazil Abstract. Although bromeliads can be important in the organization of invertebrate communities in Neotropical forests, few studies support this assumption. Bromeliads possess a three-dimensional architecture and rosette grouped leaves that provide associated animals with a good place for foraging, reproduction and egg laying, as well as shelter against desiccation and natural enemies. We collected spiders from an area of the Atlantic Rainforest, southeastern Brazil, through manual inspection in bromeliads, beating trays in herbaceous+shrubby vegetation and pitfall traps in the soil, to test if: 1) species subsets that make up the Neotropical forest spider community are compartmentalized into different habitat types (i.e., bromeliads, vegetation and ground), and 2) bromeliads are important elements that structure spider communities because they generate different patterns of abundance distributions and species composition, and thus amplify spider beta diversity. Subsets of spider species were compartmentalized into three habitat types. The presence of bromeliads represented 41% of the increase in total spider richness, and contributed most to explaining the high beta diversity values among habitats. Patterns of abundance distribution of the spider community differed among habitats. -
Okavango) Catchment, Angola
Southern African Regional Environmental Program (SAREP) First Biodiversity Field Survey Upper Cubango (Okavango) catchment, Angola May 2012 Dragonflies & Damselflies (Insecta: Odonata) Expert Report December 2012 Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Jens Kipping BioCart Assessments Albrecht-Dürer-Weg 8 D-04425 Taucha/Leipzig Germany ++49 34298 209414 [email protected] wwwbiocart.de Survey supported by Disclaimer This work is not issued for purposes of zoological nomenclature and is not published within the meaning of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (1999). Index 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................3 1.1 Odonata as indicators of freshwater health ..............................................................3 1.2 African Odonata .......................................................................................................5 1.2 Odonata research in Angola - past and present .......................................................8 1.3 Aims of the project from Odonata experts perspective ...........................................13 2 Methods .......................................................................................................................14 3 Results .........................................................................................................................18 3.1 Overall Odonata species inventory .........................................................................18 3.2 Odonata species per field