DOCSLIB.ORG

Capsizing in Canyons Susannah Porter, Carol Dehler and Colleagues Hiked Miles in Burning Heat and Braved Unforgiving River Rapids to Sample Rocks in the Grand Canyon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capsizing in Canyons Susannah Porter, Carol Dehler and Colleagues Hiked Miles in Burning Heat and Braved Unforgiving River Rapids to Sample Rocks in the Grand Canyon backstory Capsizing in canyons Susannah Porter, Carol Dehler and colleagues hiked miles in burning heat and braved unforgiving river rapids to sample rocks in the Grand Canyon. ■■ What was the objective of the work? ■■ Any low points? We wanted to study life and the When our 22-foot motorized raft environment in the early part of capsized, we lost the entire kitchen to the Neoproterozoic era, 1,000 to the rapid, and the river guide lost his 542 million years ago, just before glasses. Our two field assistants swam the low-latitude (‘Snowball Earth’) the rapid — called Lava Falls — and glaciations around 726–635 million the river guides pulled them out at years ago. Relatively little is known the other end. Luckily, our samples about life and how it responded to remained dry. the major climatic and geochemical perturbations that took place during this ■■ What were the highlights of period. The Chuar Group — a lithified the expedition? sequence of Neoproterozoic sediments Working outdoors provided its own laid down in a shallow ocean in the rewards. After a day out in the field Grand Canyon area, long before the we would sit back and enjoy a gin Grand Canyon existed — contains and tonic around the campfire. And abundant and incredibly well-preserved as we fell asleep we could look up at fossil assemblages, and thus provided an the stars. A particular highlight of the excellent opportunity to examine this trip was when we rode through the interval in more detail. rapids and descended into ‘Powell’s bowels’ — where the oldest rocks in the ■■ Why did you choose this location? Grand Canyon frame the river passage. This is the only location where the These rocks formed deep in the Earth Chuar Group is exposed, so there was no DEHLER CAROL approximately 1.8 billion years ago, and choice in the matter! are very different in appearance from the Susannah Porter and Shari Kelly sampling the overlying rocks. ■■ What sorts of samples were Chuar Group in the Grand Canyon. you after? ■■ Was it straightforward to get the We wanted fossils preserved in a detailed samples back to the lab? stratigraphic and sedimentologic geologists get bleached by the sun; rare On boat trips, we simply loaded the context, so that we could control for rainy days when it becomes impossible rocks onto the boats, and motored the palaeoenvironmental influences on fossil to take notes because of wet paper; ~150 miles downstream to camp (which patterns. Unfortunately, the majority of scorpions; mountain lion tracks; and took several days), to the boat ramp, the fossils are microscopic, and most of unnerving cliff passes. But perhaps most where we would get a shuttle back to the time we didn’t know whether we had scary was one of our trips to the field our cars. On the helicopter trip we collected any until we got back to the lab site where the Chuar Group rocks are had to restrict our sampling owing to and processed our samples. Nonetheless, exposed. Usually we would travel by boat weight limits, which was challenging. we knew from previous studies to (or once by helicopter), but one time a And on our epic 17–mile backpack target black, green and grey shale, and few of us decided to go by foot on an trip, we lugged the samples down to black chert. In addition, we discovered unmaintained ‘route’ along the North Rim the Colorado River (another five miles, incredibly abundant protozoan fossils in of the Grand Canyon. This is a 17-mile round trip), and stashed them on a beach carbonate nodules that formed in upper hike, and we miscalculated just how for a river guide to pick up later. Chuar Group shale. much water we would need. By the time we neared the end of the trail, we were ■■ Did the trip give you any ideas for ■■ Did you encounter all suffering from serious dehydration. future research projects? any difficulties? When we found a spring, we plopped We are now keen to look for evidence The are many down by the water, exhausted, only to find of the biotic transition in other rocks difficulties that there were poisonous plants growing of the same age, and to continue associated with in it. exploring the Chuar Group in working in search of more clues about the early remote parts ■■ Did you have encounters with Earth system. of the Grand dangerous animals? Canyon: really The greatest danger to us was the sun, This is the Backstory to the work by hot days when although we occasionally startled a Robin Nagy and colleagues, published on the rocks and the rattlesnake or a scorpion. page 415 of this issue. E10 NATURE GEOSCIENCE | VOL 2 | JUNE 2009 | www.nature.com/naturegeoscience © 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GRAND CANYON GUIDE No. 6
    GRAND CANYON GUIDE no. 6 ... excerpted from Grand Canyon Explorer … Bob Ribokas AN AMATEUR'S REVIEW OF BACKPACKING TOPICS FOR THE T254 - EXPEDITION TO THE GRAND CANYON - MARCH 2007 Descriptions of Grand Canyon Layers Grand Canyon attracts the attention of the world for many reasons, but perhaps its greatest significance lies in the geologic record that is so beautifully preserved and exposed here. The rocks at Grand Canyon are not inherently unique; similar rocks are found throughout the world. What is unique about the geologic record at Grand Canyon is the great variety of rocks present, the clarity with which they're exposed, and the complex geologic story they tell. Paleozoic Strata: Kaibab depositional environment: Kaibab Limestone - This layer forms the surface of the Kaibab and Coconino Plateaus. It is composed primarily of a sandy limestone with a layer of sandstone below it. In some places sandstone and shale also exists as its upper layer. The color ranges from cream to a greyish-white. When viewed from the rim this layer resembles a bathtub ring and is commonly referred to as the Canyon's bathtub ring. Fossils that can be found in this layer are brachiopods, coral, mollusks, sea lilies, worms and fish teeth. Toroweap depositional environment Toroweap Formation - This layer is composed of pretty much the same material as the Kaibab Limestone above. It is darker in color, ranging from yellow to grey, and contains a similar fossil history. Coconino depositional environment: Coconino Sandstone - This layer is composed of pure quartz sand, which are basically petrified sand dunes. Wedge-shaped cross bedding can be seen where traverse-type dunes have been petrified.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN ARIZONA PROVINCE (024) by W.C
    NORTHERN ARIZONA PROVINCE (024) By W.C. Butler INTRODUCTION This province covers about 59,000 sq mi, mostly in the southwestern part of the Colorado Plateau. Significant geologic features include the Grand Canyon, Kaibab Arch, Mogollon Highlands transition zone, Monument Uplift, Defiance Uplift, Black Mesa Basin, Holbrook Basin, and southern edges of the Kaiparowits and Blanding Basins. The stratigraphic section shown for northeastern Arizona has demonstrated the highest petroleum potential in Arizona. See Wilson (1962), Butler (1988a), and Dickinson (1989) for synopses of the province's geology and evolution. The lithologically and structurally complex basement of the Colorado Plateau area evolved from northwest-younging Proterozoic terranes sequentially accreted onto the Archean craton. As much as 12,000 ft of Middle and Late Proterozoic strata is preserved in possible rift-aulacogen depositional settings in central Arizona. Thick, unmetamorphosed, organic-rich Late Proterozoic strata deposited in backarc basins or continental lakes of north-central Arizona and south-central Utah have good petroleum potential. The plateau area, as a passive Paleozoic plate margin and buffered Mesozoic retro-arc platform, has been remarkably tectonically stable during Phanerozoic time. The area is characterized by blanket Paleozoic strata, as much as 6,000 ft thick, consisting of mostly shallow marine clastics and carbonates showing numerous disconformities. These strata accumulated during transgressions and regressions from both the northwest and southeast, onlapping and thinning toward the trans-continental arch – a northeast-trending positive area extending from the northeast into central Arizona. Convergence between North and South American tectonic plates, with reactivation of basement blocks, during the late Paleozoic created the plateau's fault-bounded basins and uplifts.
    [Show full text]
  • 740 Ma Vase-Shaped Microfossils from Yukon, Canada: Implications for Neoproterozoic Chronology and Biostratigraphy
    740 Ma vase-shaped microfossils from Yukon, Canada: Implications for Neoproterozoic chronology and biostratigraphy Justin V. Strauss1, Alan D. Rooney1, Francis A. Macdonald1, Alan D. Brandon2, and Andrew H. Knoll1 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA 2Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, 77204, USA ABSTRACT global stratigraphic correlation that goes beyond Biostratigraphy underpins the Phanerozoic time scale, but its application to pre-Ediacaran previous broad morphoclass-based biostrati- strata has remained limited because Proterozoic taxa commonly have long or unknown strati- graphic comparisons. graphic ranges, poorly understood taphonomic constraints, and/or inadequate geochrono- logical context. Here we report the discovery of abundant vase-shaped microfossils from the STRATIGRAPHY Callison Lake dolostone of the Coal Creek inlier (Yukon, Canada) that highlight the potential The Coal Creek inlier in the Ogilvie Moun- for biostratigraphic correlation of Neoproterozoic successions using species-level assemblage tains (Yukon, Canada) hosts an ~3-km-thick se- zones of limited duration. The fossiliferous horizon, dated here by Re-Os geochronology at quence of ca. 780–540 Ma Windermere Super- 739.9 ± 6.1 Ma, shares multiple species-level taxa with a well-characterized assemblage from group strata (Fig. 1; Mustard and Roots, 1997). the Chuar Group of the Grand Canyon (Arizona, USA), dated by U-Pb on zircon from an The Mount Harper Group consists of three interbedded tuff at 742 ± 6 Ma. The overlapping age and species assemblages from these two informal units; in stratigraphically ascending deposits suggest biostratigraphic utility, at least within Neoproterozoic basins of Laurentia, order , these are (1) the Callison Lake dolostone, 13 and perhaps globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2. History of Paleontological Work at Grand Canyon National Park
    Chapter 2. History of Paleontological Work at Grand Canyon National Park Up and Down the Long Federal and NGO Trails of Paleontology in Grand Canyon National Park, 1858–2019 By Earle E. Spamer1 1Academy of Natural Sciences Research Associate Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Introduction The Grand Canyon! Anywhere in the world the name rouses recognition. Monumentally impossible to describe (or so have said thousands of writers who then effused their own descriptions), it has been a lure to geologists since 1858. From the start, the rocks were read for the clues of their relative ages. It has been the draw of government agencies and non-government organizations (NGO) alike. The national park is a century old now; the canyon six to 70-some million years (depending upon with whom you argue, and about which parts of the canyon you consider); and fossils in the canyon have awaited the hammer and scanning electron microscope for even more than a billion years. So, to avoid the traps of superlatives and the gulping periods of time, this is a fast trot through “the best of” Grand Canyon paleontology, refreshed with bits of human history, with a few pauses on peculiar details—a 100th birthday present to the national park. Here, beginning with the first Grand Canyon field trip in 1858, is an accounting of how the first explorers, and scientists and educators over the years, have fashioned our understanding and encouraged our participation in the story of ancient life presented in Grand Canyon’s strata and secluded deposits. With this long look backward, we also may gain an appreciation for how paleontologists, federal administrators, and NGO champions built up the scientific and educational programs that modern resource managers receive as a legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Predators
    The rise of predators Susannah Porter Department of Earth Science, University of California−Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA Despite their abundance, diversity, and importance today, organisms Cryogenian Ediacaran C Mineralogy with mineralized skeletons are a relatively recent introduction. For the fi rst 800 Ma 700 600 phosphatic three billion years of its history, life was soft-bodied, inducing mineral- K? SMG siliceous scale microfossils ized structures passively, if at all. Beginning ca. 550 Ma, however, more calcareous ? Melicerion poikilon than two dozen clades—primarily animal, but also protistan—indepen- ? Tenuocharta cloudii agglutinated dently evolved mineralized skeletons within a geologically short interval ? sponge-like fossils Namacalathus of time (Fig. 1; Bengtson, 1992). Now a new report by Cohen et al. (2011; Cloudina p. 539 in this issue of Geology) describing beautifully intricate scale-like A BCNamapoikia microfossils from the Fifteenmile Group, Yukon Territory, provides defi ni- anabaritids hexactinellid sponges tive evidence for mineralized skeletons some 150–250 m.y. earlier. These radiolarians scale-like microfossils were fi rst reported over two decades ago (Allison foraminifera? chaetognaths and Hilgert, 1986), but neither their age nor their mineralogy were well cap-shaped fossils constrained. Work by Cohen and her colleagues has now shown that these coeloscleritophorans D E hyolithelminths scales (which perhaps enveloped a single-celled green alga) are between hyoliths ca. 717 and ca. 812 Ma in age and composed of primary phosphate (Mac- tommotiids/brachiopods donald et al., 2010; Cohen et al., 2011). This adds to earlier suggestive cambroclaves conulariids evidence for mineralization at this time: the ca. 770–742 Ma vase-shaped molluscs microfossil (VSM) Melicerion poikilon, interpreted on the basis of tapho- paracarinachitids coleolids nomic models to be a euglyphid amoeba whose organic-walled test was archaeocyaths embedded with mineralized scales, possibly siliceous (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenozoic Stratigraphy and Paleogeography of the Grand Canyon, AZ Amanda D'el
    Pre-Cenozoic Stratigraphy and Paleogeography of the Grand Canyon, AZ Amanda D’Elia Abstract The Grand Canyon is a geologic wonder offering a unique glimpse into the early geologic history of the North American continent. The rock record exposed in the massive canyon walls reveals a complex history spanning more than a Billion years of Earth’s history. The earliest known rocks of the Southwestern United States are found in the Basement of the Grand Canyon and date Back to 1.84 Billion years old (Ga). The rocks of the Canyon can Be grouped into three distinct sets Based on their petrology and age (Figure 1). The oldest rocks are the Vishnu Basement rocks exposed at the Base of the canyon and in the granite gorges. These rocks provide a unique clue as to the early continental formation of North America in the early PrecamBrian. The next set is the Grand Canyon Supergroup, which is not well exposed throughout the canyon, But offers a glimpse into the early Beginnings of Before the CamBrian explosion. The final group is the Paleozoic strata that make up the Bulk of the Canyon walls. Exposure of this strata provides a detailed glimpse into North American environmental changes over nearly 300 million years (Ma) of geologic history. Together these rocks serve not only as an awe inspiring Beauty But a unique opportunity to glimpse into the past. Vishnu Basement Rocks The oldest rocks exposed within the Grand Canyon represent some of the earliest known rocks in the American southwest. John Figure 1. Stratigraphic column showing Wesley Paul referred to them as the “dreaded the three sets of rocks found in the Grand rock” Because they make up the walls of some Canyon, their thickness and approximate of the quickest and most difficult rapids to ages (Mathis and Bowman, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • The Long and Extraordinary History of Life in Our Office Christa Sadler GTS 2006/March 25
    LIFE IN STONE: The Long and Extraordinary History of Life in Our Office Christa Sadler GTS 2006/March 25 PRECAMBRIAN (4.6 billion to 544 million years ago) • Life on Earth begins about 3.5 billion years ago: single-celled bacteria that often form stromatolites (later, when true algae evolves, it also form stromatolites). The earliest life in Grand Canyon is about 1.2 billion years old, in the Bass Formation of the GC Supergroup. Several of the Supergroup layers have stromatolites in them, most made of true algae. There are several species known in Grand Canyon, ranging in size from a few inches high to several tens of feet long. Multicellular life appeared about 700 million years ago, and may have been present in some of the later Chuar Group sediments, but the evidence is sketchy at best. PALEOZOIC Cambrian (544 to 490 million years ago) Tapeats, Bright Angel, Muav) • The “Cambrian Explosion” in the early part of the Cambrian saw the beginnings of all the major groups of animals alive today. This diversification of life may have taken as little as five million years, which is, trust me, a really short time, geologically speaking. • The Cambrian seas were dominated by animals that were filter feeders, that is, little bulldozers that dug food out of the sediment. We see evidence of this in the Tapeats Sandstone and Bright Angel Shale, where worm burrows and trilobite tracks are really common. There are some 40 species of trilobites in Grand Canyon, but none of them are all that well preserved. At the time of the Tapeats/BA/Muav, there was no life on land, although there are some things found in the Bright Angel that some researchers interpret as spores from land plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Proterozoic Multistage (Ca. 1.1 and 0.8 Ga) Extension Recorded in The
    Proterozoic multistage (ca. 1.1 and 0.8 Ga) extension recorded in the Grand Canyon Supergroup and establishment of northwest- and north-trending tectonic grains in the southwestern United States J. Michael Timmons* Karl E. Karlstrom Carol M. Dehler John W. Geissman Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA Matthew T. Heizler New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA ABSTRACT tures and ca. 800±700 Ma north-trending cord of intracratonic extensional tectonism extensional structures created regional and sedimentation inboard of the plate mar- The Grand Canyon Supergroup records fault networks that were tectonically in- gins. We recognize at least two discrete epi- at least two distinct periods of intracratonic verted during formation of the Ancestral sodes of Proterozoic extension in Grand Can- extension and sedimentation in the late Me- Rocky Mountains and Laramide contrac- yon, one at ca. 1100±900 Ma and another at soproterozoic and Neoproterozoic. New tion and reactivated during Tertiary 800±700 Ma. Two different structural trends 40Ar/39Ar age determinations indicate that extension. were associated with these two episodes of ex- the Mesoproterozoic Unkar Group was de- tension: northwest-striking faults are associ- posited between ca. 1.2 and 1.1 Ga. Basins Keywords: Chuar Group, Grand Canyon, ated with deposition and tilting of the Unkar in which the Unkar Group was deposited growth faults, intracratonic basins, Neopro- Group and north-striking faults were active and the related northwest-striking faults terozoic, Proterozoic rifting. during deposition of the Chuar Group (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shinumo Quadrangle, Grand Canyon District, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY , ' ' ' *< ! !-" GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOB BULLETIN 549 THE SHINUMO QUADRANGLE GRAND CANYON DISTRICT ARIZONA BY L. F. NOBLE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Preface, by F. L. Kansome................................................. Introduction.............................................................. Location and geography................................................ Field work............................................................ Literature............................................................ Acknowledgments.........................................."............ Physiography of the Grand Canyon district................................. 15 Topography of the Shinumo quadrangle...................................... 2l Climate. .........=...................................................... 25 Vegetation............................................................... 27 Indian ruins.............................................................. 28 Geology.................................................................. 29 Age and character of the rocks.......................................... 29 . Series of rocks discriminated........................................... 31 Proterozoic rocks..................................................... I 32 Archean system.................................................... 32 Vishnu schist.................................................. 32 Name...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic, Microfossil, and Geochemical Analysis of the Neoproterozoic Uinta Mountain Group, Utah: Evidence Fo a Eutrophication Event?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@USU Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2011 Stratigraphic, Microfossil, and Geochemical Analysis of the Neoproterozoic Uinta Mountain Group, Utah: Evidence fo a Eutrophication Event? Dawn Schmidli Hayes Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Sedimentology Commons Recommended Citation Hayes, Dawn Schmidli, "Stratigraphic, Microfossil, and Geochemical Analysis of the Neoproterozoic Uinta Mountain Group, Utah: Evidence fo a Eutrophication Event?" (2011). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 874. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/874 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRATIGRAPHIC, MICROFOSSIL, AND GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE NEOPROTEROZOIC UINTA MOUNTAIN GROUP, UTAH: EVIDENCE FOR A EUTROPHICATION EVENT? by Dawn Schmidli Hayes A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology Approved: ______________________________ ______________________________ Dr. Carol M. Dehler Dr. John Shervais Major Advisor Committee Member ______________________________ __________________________ Dr. W. David Liddell Dr. Byron R. Burnham Committee Member Dean of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2010 ii ABSTRACT Stratigraphic, Microfossil, and Geochemical Analysis of the Neoproterozoic Uinta Mountain Group, Utah: Evidence for a Eutrophication Event? by Dawn Schmidli Hayes, Master of Science Utah State University, 2010 Major Professor: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine and Non-Marine Strata Preserving Ediacaran Microfossils Ilana Lehn , Rodrigo Scalise Horodyski & Paulo Sérgio Gomes Paim
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Marine and non-marine strata preserving Ediacaran microfossils Ilana Lehn , Rodrigo Scalise Horodyski & Paulo Sérgio Gomes Paim We report the frst occurrence of microfossils in Ediacaran strata of the Camaquã Basin. The assemblage Received: 11 November 2018 includes simple (Leiosphaeridia sp. predominantly) and ornamented acritarchs associated with Accepted: 7 May 2019 microbial mats. They are related to the Ediacaran Complex Acanthomorph Palynofora (ECAP) and Late Published: xx xx xxxx Ediacaran Leiosphere Palynofora (LELP) due to the similar morphology and time interval assigned to those assemblages, though the observed specimens are a lot simpler and less diversifed. However, diferent from the usual occurrences, this case study reports Neoproterozoic cosmopolitan communities living in marine (basal unit) and lacustrine (middle units) settings. Fossils within non-marine strata in the Precambrian record are rare. Therefore, this frst fnding of microfossils in the Camaquã Basin constitutes a new piece of the puzzle related to the history of the Panafrican-Brasiliano basins and shed some light on possible settings where the Ediacaran eukaryotes have evolved. Precambrian sedimentary basins have been intensively investigated all around the world in terms of eukary- otic protists that arise in the Late Paleoproterozoic Era but intensively diversify during the Ediacaran Period. Te Proterozoic life is generally regarded as dominated by marine and intertidal biota preserved in both car- bonate1,2 and siliciclastic3,4 rocks. However, a few studies also indicate that Precambrian land surfaces housed biota in paleokarst5, lateritic paleosols6, lacustrine7 and subaerial non-marine settings8. Actually, non-marine, organic-walled microfossils identifed as acritarchs were frst described long ago, in a Torridonian sequence of northwest Scotland9, and were later refned by other authors10,11.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neoproterozoic Chuar Group: a Unique Window Into the Coevolution of Life and Environment in a Re- Stricted Marine Setting
    Astrobiology Science Conference 2015 (2015) 7512.pdf The Neoproterozoic Chuar Group: A unique window into the coevolution of life and environment in a re- stricted marine setting. C. W. Diamond1 C. M. Dehler2, K. E. Karlstrom3, and T. W. Lyons1, 1University of Cali- fornia, Riverside, 2Utah State University, 3University of New Mexico. The Tonian-Cryogenian (1000-635 Ma) was a time flect sulfidation of organic matter, consistent with the of dramatic change in Earth history. Coincident with notion of limited supplies of reactive Fe. the initial breakup of Rodinia, the first major diversifi- Although the carbon isotope and fossil records in- cation of eukaryotes began ~800 Ma, setting the stage dicate that the this basin shared some connection with for the first appearance of metazoans shortly after. As the open ocean, sedimentological evidence for repeated this critical evolutionary transition progressed, large- subaerial exposure suggests a very shallow water depth scale perturbations to biogeochemical cycling and cli- for much, if not all, of the Chuar’s deposition. The mate are evident in dramatic excursions in the carbon major element composition of the uppermost Chuar is isotope record, both positive and negative, and the on- consistent with a shallow, restricted setting, under a set of global glaciation at ~717 Ma. Recent advances strong influence of local watershed effects. Aluminum in geochronology and correlation have contributed concentrations are generally high, reaching a maxi- significantly to building a more holistic picture of this mum of over 3-times crustal average. The majority of pivotal time in Earth history, though there are still other major and minor elements, however, remain al- many conflicting lines of evidence, and many ques- most exclusively below average crustal values.
    [Show full text]