DOCSLIB.ORG

Intersectionality and Suffrage: When Did All Women Achieve Voting Rights in Oregon?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intersectionality and Suffrage: When Did All Women Achieve Voting Rights in Oregon? Beyond Suffrage Intersectionality and Suffrage: When Did All Women Achieve Voting Rights in Oregon? Foundational Lesson This curriculum may be successfully used with or without a museum visit. Developed by Sarah Anderson in consultation with OHS staff and advisory board. Beyond Suffrage Overview Students study a timeline of voting rights for women to learn when different groups of women achieved suffrage in Oregon. Students then apply their findings to specific women in Oregon from 1912. Learning Objectives › Students understand that not all women were able to vote in Oregon in 1912. › Students can explain how citizenship and voting rights in the U.S. and Oregon have historically been closely tied to race and ethnicity. › Students comprehend that traditionally marginalized groups have had to struggle throughout American history to expand citizenship eligibility and that the fight to protect voting rights continues. Guiding Questions › How have federal and state policies defined who is eligible for citizenship in the United States? How has it changed over time? › What is the relationship between state and federal immigration policies? › How do race, ethnicity, and nationality intersect with gender in the struggle for political power? Background The 1912 amendment to the Oregon Constitution granted woman Information suffrage, but not all women in Oregon had the privileges of citizenship and therefore could not exercise the newly won right. First-generation Japanese and Chinese women were prohibited from becoming American citizens in the early 20th century, and therefore, could not vote (see Citizenship and Voting Rights Timeline). However, their children gained citizenship through the 14th amendment, and would be able to vote. Because of federal immigration laws, such as the Chinese Exclusion Act, there were very few Chinese women living in Oregon during the early 20th century, and the Japanese female population was still small and mostly made up of first-generation immigrants. “After the 1907–1908 Gentlemen’s Agreement between Japan and the United States allowed family members to immigrate, the number of Issei (Japanese immigrant) women in Oregon increased from 294 in 1910 to 1,349 in 1920.” (The Oregon Encyclopedia) Voting rights for Indigenous women may have depended on their individual situation, and whether or not they or their family had acquired citizenship through the Dawes Act. Oregon Historical Society Nevertheless, They Persisted Curriculum • Page 2 Background Note that the Dawes Act was a method for further reducing Information Indigenous land-holdings and was predicated on the assumption (continued) that Indigenous populations would continue to decrease. Other Indigenous women or mixed-race women may have passed as white, married white men, integrated into mainstream Oregon society, and accepted voting rights in 1912. The Indian Citizenship Act (Snyder Act) of 1924 offered citizenship to Native Americans, but it left voting rights up to states. The same year, Oregon voters approved a literacy test as a prerequisite for voting rights that would have impacted both Indigenous and first-generation immigrant voters. The literacy test remained in the Oregon Constitution until it was overridden by the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965. Although such barriers prevented all Indigenous women from full U.S. citizenship, many Indigenous women were able to vote and serve in their tribal governments. Even though the Oregon Constitution explicitly restricted voting to white males, it was overridden by the 15th amendment (which Oregon did not vote to ratify). As far as Oregon historians can tell, both white and black women were able to acquire voter registration cards and cast ballots after 1912. This is different from the American South, where states had created restrictions to prevent black citizens from voting, making the 19th amendment to the U.S. Constitution inaccessible for black women. There is little to no research on how suffrage impacted Latina voters, simply because there weren’t many Latina residents in the state of Oregon in the early 20th century: “The 1910 Oregon Census reports that no Mexicans or Latinos lived in Oregon, but the issuance of money orders to Mexico from Oregon indicates that at least fifty Mexicans were in the state in 1900 and eighty-five in 1910.” (“Latinos in Oregon” Essay, The Oregon Encyclopedia). It is uncertain how many of that number were women. However, recent research into the 1920 census has identified Mexican American women citizens in Oregon who would have been eligible to register to vote. Before teaching this lesson, your students should have background knowledge of both the 14th and 15th amendments. This article from history.com for you and/or your students explains the history of birthright citizenship (leading up to and including the 14th amendment). Here is a short clip for you and/or your students reviewing the 15th amendment: Sound Smart: the 15th Amendment with historian Yohuru Williams. Oregon Historical Society Nevertheless, They Persisted Curriculum • Page 3 Delivery Time Two 45-minute class periods Vocabulary › Citizenship: being a legally recognized subject of a state or nation, whether by birth or by naturalization › Emigrate: leave one’s own country in order to settle permanently in another (noun form: emigration) › Franchise: the right to vote › Immigrate: come to live permanently in a foreign country (noun form: immigration) › Intersectionality: the interconnected nature of social categories such as race, class, and gender; these often create overlapping experiences of discrimination or disadvantage › Naturalization: the process or act of giving citizenship to a foreigner in a country › Primary Source: information about an event or time in the past made by someone who lived during that time and learned about or participated in the event or time. Some examples include a letter, speech, or artifact, such as a basket or shoe, as long as they were made or used by the person at that time. › Ratification: the action of signing or giving formal consent to a treaty, contract, or agreement, making it officially valid › Secondary Source: information about an event or time in the past that was created after the fact by someone who did not experience it first-hand or participate in the events or time. Some examples include scholarly books and articles as well as reference books, such as encyclopedias. › Suffrage: the right to vote in political elections Materials Needed › Citizenship and Voting Rights Timeline (with links to primary and secondary documents) › When Did Women Achieve Voting Rights in Oregon? blank table › Who Could Vote in Oregon in 1912? Student handout › Slideshow introducing the six women from the student handout Step by Step Step One: Instructions Oregon changed the constitution in 1912 to strike out the word “male” to describe who had suffrage rights. Does that mean all women in Oregon were able to vote starting in 1912? Why would or wouldn’t that be true? Oregon Historical Society Nevertheless, They Persisted Curriculum • Page 4 Step by Step Step Two: Instructions Hand out Citizenship and Voting Rights Timeline and When Did (continued) Women Achieve Voting Rights in Oregon? blank table. If possible, you could also share the timeline as an electronic document and students can use hyperlinks to learn more about laws and amendments. Otherwise, you may wish to print some of the hyperlinked pages and have them available for further investigation. Students use the timeline to fill in the blank table with the year of acquired suffrage and notes about why. Step Three: Tell students that you are going to show them a slideshow highlighting different Oregon women in 1912. Distribute Who Could Vote in Oregon in 1912? student handout. Tell students that they are going to use this sheet to make their guess about whether or not each woman had suffrage rights. They can use the timeline and table for reference. Step Four: Show the slideshow, one woman at a time. Students find out preliminary information about each woman, consult their table, and then write their answers on their sheets before you turn to the following slide, revealing the answer. Step Five: Discussion: › What do you notice about the relationship between citizenship and voting rights throughout U.S. history? › What did you learn about women’s voting rights in Oregon that you didn’t know before? What surprised or didn’t surprise you? › What do you notice about federal legislation concerning citizenship versus state legislation? How did they interact with and affect each other? › How do you think different women experienced the suffrage victories of 1912 (Oregon) and 1920 (United States)? Were they celebrated by all women? Are they still? Assessments Completed handouts from slideshow activity. Oregon Historical Society Nevertheless, They Persisted Curriculum • Page 5 Teacher Notes Students may struggle with the “maybe” answers to the slideshow quiz, but that is further evidence of the complexity around the questions of citizenship and voting rights. Let them know that it is completely okay to start their written evidence with “It depends….” This lesson references the racist origin of the state’s constitution and other founding laws. › For a comprehensive set of lessons on this topic, see the Experience Oregon curriculum for grades 6–8 in which students analyze the lasting legacy of Oregon legislation in relation to its current racial diversity. › For more about Oregon and the 15th amendment: The Oregon Encyclopedia. › For more about Oregon and the 14th amendment: “Race, Politics, and Denial: Why Oregon Forgot to Ratify the 14th Amendment” by Cheryl A. Brooks. Support for All › Instead of having students fill in the table, you can give them the Students timeline and this When Women Achieved Voting Rights in Oregon completed table to study and highlight. › Have students work in different “expert” groups, each researching the voting rights of just one group of women. That expert group can serve as teachers during the slide show portion of the lesson.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brf Public Schools
    BRF PUBLIC SCHOOLS HISTORY CURRICULUM RELATED TO AMERICAN INDIAN STUDIES GRADES 8-12 COMPONENT The following materials represent ongoing work related to the infusion of American Indian history into the History curriculum of the Black River Falls Public Schools. Our efforts in this area have been ongoing for over 20 years and reflect the spirit of Wisconsin Act 31. SEPTEMBER 2011 UPDATE Paul S Rykken Michael Shepard US History and Politics US History BRFHS BRF Middle School Infusion Applications 1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW The Infusion Task Force was established in December of 2009 for the purpose of improving our efforts regarding the infusion of American Indian history and cultural awareness throughout the BRF Public School K-12 Social Studies Curriculum. This action occurred within the context of several other factors, including the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between the Ho-chunk Nation and the School District and the establishment of a Ho-chunk language offering at BRFHS. Our infusion efforts go back to the early 1990s and were originally spurred by the Wisconsin Legislature’s passage of Act 31 related to the teaching of Native American history and culture within Wisconsin’s public schools. The following link will take you to a paper that more fully explains our approach since the early 1990s: http://www.brf.org/sites/default/files/users/u123/InfusionUpdate09.pdf THE 8-12 COMPONENT As with any curriculum-related project, what follows is not the final word. We do our work in an ever- changing environment. The lessons and information included here, however, reflect the most recent (and complete) record of what we are doing within our 8-12 curriculum.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous People of Western New York
    FACT SHEET / FEBRUARY 2018 Indigenous People of Western New York Kristin Szczepaniec Territorial Acknowledgement In keeping with regional protocol, I would like to start by acknowledging the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee and by honoring the sovereignty of the Six Nations–the Mohawk, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, Seneca and Tuscarora–and their land where we are situated and where the majority of this work took place. In this acknowledgement, we hope to demonstrate respect for the treaties that were made on these territories and remorse for the harms and mistakes of the far and recent past; and we pledge to work toward partnership with a spirit of reconciliation and collaboration. Introduction This fact sheet summarizes some of the available history of Indigenous people of North America date their history on the land as “since Indigenous people in what is time immemorial”; some archeologists say that a 12,000 year-old history on now known as Western New this continent is a close estimate.1 Today, the U.S. federal government York and provides information recognizes over 567 American Indian and Alaskan Native tribes and villages on the contemporary state of with 6.7 million people who identify as American Indian or Alaskan, alone Haudenosaunee communities. or combined.2 Intended to shed light on an often overlooked history, it The land that is now known as New York State has a rich history of First includes demographic, Nations people, many of whom continue to influence and play key roles in economic, and health data on shaping the region. This fact sheet offers information about Native people in Indigenous people in Western Western New York from the far and recent past through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CITIZENSHIP ACT of 1924 WAS an INTEGRAL PILLAR of the COLONIZATION and FORCED ASSIMILATION POLICIES of the UNITED STATES in VIOLATION of TREATIES
    THE CITIZENSHIP ACT OF 1924 WAS AN INTEGRAL PILLAR OF THE COLONIZATION and FORCED ASSIMILATION POLICIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN VIOLATION OF TREATIES INTRODUCTION: The Onondaga Nation and the Haudenosaunee have never accepted the authority of the United States to make Six Nations citizens become citizens of the United States, as claimed in the Citizenship Act of 1924. We hold three treaties with the United States: the 1784 Treaty of Fort Stanwix, the 1789 Treaty of Fort Harmor and the 1794 Treaty of Canandaigua. These treaties clearly recognize the Haudenosaunee as separate and sovereign Nations. Accepting United States citizenship would be treason to their own Nations, a violation of the treaties and a violation of international law, as recognized in the 2007 United Nation Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. This paper will briefly review the history of land theft, removal and forced assimilation by the United States and how the 1924 Citizenship Act is woven into this disgraceful pattern of deceit and destruction. It will examine the true purposes of the Act and its history. Finally, we will review the contemporaneous resistance to the Act by the Onondaga Nation, on behalf of the Confederacy. For centuries, the European settlers and then the United States, have struggled with what they have called “the Indian problem”. This “problem” was largely defined as: how to take the Indians’ land and how to deal with the Indians still surviving and continuing to populate their own communities. In spite of the European and American efforts to the contrary, the Haudenosaunee have remained in sovereign control of some of their land, and all of their language and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Xenophobia and Racism
    MODERNIZING AMERICA, 1889-1920 Xenophobia and Racism Resource: Life Story: Zitkala-Sa, aka Gertrude Simmons Bonnin (1876-1938) Zitkala-Sa was born on February 22, 1876 on the Yankton Indian Reservation. She spent her early childhood on the reservation with her mother, who was of Sioux Dakota heritage. Little is known about her father, who was Anglo-American. When Zitkala-Sa was eight years old, missionaries from the White’s Manual Labor Institute in Indiana came to the Yankton reservation to recruit children for their boarding school. Zitkala-Sa’s older brother had recently returned from such a school, and her mother was hesitant to send her daughter away. Zitkala-Sa, however, was eager to go. For children who had never been off the reservation, the school sounded like a magical place. The missionaries told stories about riding trains and picking red apples in large fields. After debating the decision, Zitkala-Sa’s mother agreed to let her go. She did not want her daughter to leave and did not trust the white strangers, but she feared that the Dakota way of life was ending. There were no schools on the reservation, and she wanted her daughter to have an education. According to her autobiography, as soon as Zitkala-Sa boarded the train, she regretted begging her mother to let her go. She was about to spend years away from everything she knew. She did not know English, and tribal languages were banned at the school. She would be forced to give up her Dakota culture for an “American” one.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924
    New Mexico Historical Review Volume 47 Number 3 Article 4 7-1-1972 The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 Gary C. Stein Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Stein, Gary C.. "The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924." New Mexico Historical Review 47, 3 (2021). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol47/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. 257 THE INDIAN CITIZENSHIP ACT OF 1924 GARY C. STEIN ON June 2, 1924, President Calvin Coolidge signed into law a very brief act stating "that all noncitizen Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States be, and they are hereby, de­ clared to be citizens of the United States: Provided, that the grant­ ing of such citizenship shall not in any manner impair or other­ wise affect the right of any Indian to tribal or other property."! There already existed many ways by which most American Indians had become citizens by 1924: through allotments under the Dawes Act of 1887, and later the Burke Act of 1906; through marriage to a white citizen; and through treaties or any of'a num­ ber of special acts of Congress covering either specific tribes or individual Indians. Since there were only about 125,000 non­ citizen Indians living in the United States, there was little excite­ ment over the passage of the act of June 2, despite the fact that Homer P.Snyder of New York, the Congressman who had intro­ duced the legislation in the House of Representatives and the Chairman of the House Committee on Indian Affairs, called it "perhaps one of the leading bills enacted into law during this session...
    [Show full text]
  • Family Type and Incidence
    RULING OR BEING RULED? THE DEVELOPMENT OF CITIZENSHIP IN THE CHEROKEE NATION _______________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ by AARON KUSHNER Dr. Justin Dyer, Dissertation Supervisor JULY 2019 DEDICATION …………………To Mary Ann and Robert Kushner. You saw in me something special. …………………To Ryan, Daniel, and Tommy. You are the best of friends. …………………To Nhi, G, Lea, Dale, and Christopher. I couldn’t ask for better family. …………………To Hannah. You are all beauty and color and light. …………………Gloria Patri, et Filio, et Spiritui Sancto. Sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper, et in saecula saeculorum. Amen. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Professor Justin Dyer for his mentorship and guidance throughout this dissertation project. Without his wisdom, kindness, and encouragement, none of this would have been possible. I also want to acknowledge Professor Adam Seagrave, who mentored me at Northern Illinois University and again here at the University of Missouri. His insight and advice have been an invaluable part of my professional development. Thank you to Professor Sarah Beth Kitch, who gave generously of her time to help me improve the quality of my writing. Thank you as well to dissertation committee members Marvin Overby and Jay Dow for all of your time and ongoing support. Additional thanks are due to Professors Scot Schraufnagel, Brad Watson, Jason King, Laron Williams, and Jason Jividen, who mentored and supported me at various stages of my academic career.
    [Show full text]
  • Euchee (Yuchi) Tribe of Indians Tribal Website(S): Http
    OKLAHOMA INDIAN TRIBE EDUCATION GUIDE Euchee Tribe of Indians (Oklahoma Social Studies Standards, OSDE) Tribe: Euchee (Yuchi) Tribe of Indians Tribal website(s): http//www.eucheetribe.com 1. Migration/movement/forced removal Oklahoma History C3 Standard 2.3 “Integrate visual and textual evidence to explain the reasons for and trace the migrations of Native American peoples including the Five Tribes into present-day Oklahoma, the Indian Removal Act of 1830, and tribal resistance to the forced relocations.” Oklahoma History C3 Standard 2.7 “Compare and contrast multiple points of view to evaluate the impact of the Dawes Act which resulted in the loss of tribal communal lands and the redistribution of lands by various means including land runs as typified by the Unassigned Lands and the Cherokee Outlet, lotteries, and tribal allotments.” Original Homeland –present-day southeastern United States including Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama Location in Oklahoma – Northeastern Oklahoma, Tulsa and Creek Counties The Yuchi (often also spelled Euchee) are an American Indian people of Oklahoma whose original homelands were in the present southeastern United States. At first contact with Europeans they resided in autonomous communities found in what is now eastern Tennessee, but during the colonial period they established settlements throughout the southeastern United States. The Spanish explorer, Hernando De Soto, and his expedition first encountered the Euchee (Yuchi) people in the mountainous areas of Tennessee around 1540. They were forced from that area by the Shawnee and Cherokee Indians where the Euchee fled into what is now Georgia and Alabama. They later joined a loosely organized confederacy already established in the Southeast prior to the arrival of the Muskogean tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1968 Indian Civil Rights Act: from Termination to Self-Determination
    THE 1968 INDIAN CIVIL RIGHTS ACT: FROM TERMINATION TO SELF-DETERMINATION AUTHOR: Chris Stewart / North Lakes Academy Charter School, Forest Lake, Minnesota GUIDING QUESTION: How did the rights of American Indians change between the passage of the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 and the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968? OVERVIEW › CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.9-10.6 Compare the point of view of two or more authors for how they treat the same The lesson will explore the concepts of individual rights and or similar topics, including which details they include and tribal sovereignty through a selection of primary resources emphasize in their respective accounts. from the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 through the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968. The mid-twentieth-century federal CONNECTIONS TO C3 FRAMEWORK policies of termination and self-determination are also › D2.Civ.1.9-12. Distinguish the powers and responsibilities explored, as are civil rights movements led by American of local, state, tribal, national, and international civic and Indian leaders. political institutions. › D2.Civ.5.9-12. Evaluate citizens’ and institutions’ effectiveness in addressing social and political problems OBJECTIVES at the local, state, tribal, national, and/or international level. At the conclusion of this activity, students will be able to › D2.His.3.9-12. Use questions generated about individuals › Interpret the meaning of tribal sovereignty and dual and groups to assess how the significance of their citizenship; actions changes over time and is shaped by the historical › Apply the concepts of termination and self-determination context. in the context of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Foundation of American Indian Education
    History and Foundation of American Indian Education Written by Stan Juneau Revised and Updated by Walter Fleming and Lance Foster Indian Education for All Division 2001/rev. 2012-2013 History and Foundation of American Indian Education Written by Stan Juneau Revised and Updated by Walter Fleming and Lance Foster Indian Education for All Division 2001/rev. 2012-2013 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Traditional Indian Education and European Intrusion (1492-1787) 4 Traditional Indian Education 5 Indians in Montana 6 An Intrusion Process: Involuntary Minorities 7 Chapter Two: Federalism and the Indian Treaty Period (1787-1871) 9 Legal Foundations 10 The Constitution and the Commerce Clause 10 Indian Treaties and Education 11 Indian Treaties in Montana 12 End of Treaty Period 12 Effects of Treaties on Indian Lands and Education 13 Chapter Three: The Indian Boarding School (1617-Present) 17 Missionary Period (1500s-1800s) 18 Federal Period (1800s-Present) 19 The Federal Boarding School System 19 Carlisle Indian School 20 Boarding Schools in Montana 23 Indian Boarding Schools Today 25 Chapter Four: The Allotment Period (1887-1934) 28 Property as a Basis of Western Societies 29 The Dawes Act of 1887 (General Allotment Act) 30 The Allotment Period in Montana 30 Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 31 The Meriam Report of 1928 31 Chapter Five: Tribal Reorganization Period (1934-1953) 34 The Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934 35 Tribal Constitutions 36 The Johnson-O’Malley Act of 1934 37 The Reorganization Period in Montana 38 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Feathers and Equality: Lessons on Religious Exceptions from the Native American Experience Kevin J
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2005 Eagle Feathers and Equality: Lessons on Religious Exceptions from the Native American Experience Kevin J. Worthen BYU Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Kevin J. Worthen, ????? ???????? ??? ????????: ??????? ?? ????????? ?????????? ???? ??? ?????? ???????? ??????????, 76 U. Cᴏʟᴏ. L. Rᴇᴠ. 989 (2005). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EAGLE FEATHERS AND EQUALITY: LESSONS ON RELIGIOUS EXCEPTIONS FROM THE NATIVE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE KEViN J. WORTHEN* The legality and propriety of exempting religiously motivated con- duct from otherwise applicablelegal norms is the subject of ongoing scholarly,judicial, and legislative debate. The issue is particularly thorny when it arises in a legal system deeply committed to the con- cept of equality. The Eagle Protection Act, which exempts Native Americans religiouspractitioners who are members offederally rec- ognized tribesfrom its general prohibition on the taking and use of bald and golden eagle feathers, provides an interesting context in which to examine that debate. Not only does the Act exempt relig- iously motivated conduct from the otherwise applicable norms, it prefers some religious users (Native Americans who are members of federally recognized tribes) over other religious users, and does so on the basis of ancestry and political affiliation. A statutory scheme which discriminates on the basis of such important matters as reli- gious preference, ancestry, and political affiliation would seem to run counter to the concept of equality in a number of respects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Citizenship Act and the Meaning of American Citizenship
    THE INDIAN CITIZENSHIP ACT AND THE MEANING OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP AUTHOR: Westley Green / Gautier High School, Gautier, Mississippi GUIDING QUESTION: How have American Indians and the U.S. government debated the meaning of American citizenship? OVERVIEW › CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.9-10.6 Compare the point of view of two or more authors for how they treat the same Using primary and secondary source analysis, students or similar topics, including which details they include and will examine the viewpoints from the U.S. government and emphasize in their respective accounts. American Indian nations over American citizenship as it relates to the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924. CONNECTIONS TO C3 FRAMEWORK › D2.Civ.2.9-12. Analyze the role of citizens in the U.S. political system, with attention to various theories of OBJECTIVES democracy, changes in Americans’ participation over At the conclusion of this activity, students will be able to time, and alternative models from other countries, past and present. › Analyze different perspectives of citizenship for › D2.Civ.10.9-12. Analyze the impact and the appropriate American Indians; roles of personal interests and perspectives on the application of civic virtues, democratic principles, › Examine the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 to determine constitutional rights, and human rights. the conditions in which citizenship was granted to American Indians; › D2.His.4.9-12. Analyze complex and interacting factors that influenced the perspectives of people during different › Analyze primary and secondary sources related to the historical eras. perspectives of the Indian Citizenship Act; and › D2.His.5.9-12. Analyze how historical contexts shaped › Evaluate how American Indians have been included in and continue to shape people’s perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • T.R.A.I.L. US History Timeline
    T.R.A.I.L. US History Timeline 1830s Indian Removal Act – forces Native Americans who live east of the Mississippi River to move west 1830 Soft drinks (pop; soda) invented 1833 Sewing machine invented 1835 Cherokees are forced to cede lands in Georgia and cross the Mississippi River after gold is found on their land 1838 Trail of Tears – forced removal of American Indians from the southeastern states to Oklahoma. 1840s 1841 First Settlers move westward along the Oregon Trail 1847 Peanut brittle invented 1848 There are 30 states in the US. 1850s 1850 Modern marshmallows invented. 1853 First potato chips are made 1854 Indian Appropriation Act-gave Congress authority to establish reservations 1860s 1860 Hot Dog invented 1862 Homestead Act – encourages settlers to move West Civil War begins 1861 First Supermarket Opens in New York City 1864 Frybread invented 1865 Civil War ends 1870s 1873 First blue jeans made Telephone invented 1876 Battle of Little Bighorn Heinz ketchup invented 1877 First record player invented 1879 Carlisle Indian School in Pennsylvania is founded 1880s 1880 Automobile invented 1886 Coca Cola invented 1887 General Allotment Act (Dawes Act) - eliminated right of Indians to hold tribal land in common 1888 Vending Machines are introduced in America 1890s 1890 Battle of Wounded Knee 1891 Basketball invented 1895 Peanut butter invented 1897 Cotton candy invented 1900s 1901 Peanut butter and jelly sandwich invented First airplane flight 1903 Crayons invented 1905 First Popsicle invented 1910s 1912 Lifesavers and Oreos invented 1913 Ford Motors uses first assembly line; cars become mass produced 1914 First commercial airline flight in the US occurs between St.
    [Show full text]