DOCSLIB.ORG

1 the Role of Gender Ideology and Essentialist Beliefs In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 the Role of Gender Ideology and Essentialist Beliefs In THE ROLE OF GENDER IDEOLOGY AND ESSENTIALIST BELIEFS IN REDUCING ANTI-TRANSGENDER PREJUDICE By MORGAN A. CONWAY A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2018 1 © 2018 Morgan A. Conway 2 To my friends and family 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my family, my friends, and my partner Tessa for their support, generosity, and kindness. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................8 ABSTRACT .....................................................................................................................................9 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................11 Prejudice against Transgender People ....................................................................................11 Transphobia and Attitudes toward Transgender People .........................................................12 Traditional Gender Role Ideology and Prejudice against Transgender People ......................12 Essentialism and Prejudice against Transgender People ........................................................13 Overview of Current Studies ..................................................................................................14 2 STUDY 1 ................................................................................................................................17 Method ....................................................................................................................................17 Participants ......................................................................................................................17 Materials ..........................................................................................................................17 Gender role manipulation .........................................................................................17 Outcome variables ....................................................................................................18 Procedure .........................................................................................................................19 Results.....................................................................................................................................20 Discussion ...............................................................................................................................21 3 STUDY 2 ................................................................................................................................26 Method ....................................................................................................................................26 Participants ......................................................................................................................26 Materials ..........................................................................................................................26 Gender role manipulation .........................................................................................26 Outcome variables ....................................................................................................27 Procedure .........................................................................................................................28 Results.....................................................................................................................................28 Discussion ...............................................................................................................................29 4 STUDY 3 ................................................................................................................................33 Method ....................................................................................................................................33 Participants ......................................................................................................................33 Materials ..........................................................................................................................33 Gender role manipulation .........................................................................................33 Outcome variables ....................................................................................................34 5 Procedure .........................................................................................................................35 Results.....................................................................................................................................36 Discussion ...............................................................................................................................37 5 STUDY 4 ................................................................................................................................40 Method ....................................................................................................................................40 Participants ......................................................................................................................40 Materials ..........................................................................................................................40 Gender role manipulation ................................................................................................40 Outcome variables ....................................................................................................40 Procedure ..................................................................................................................41 Results.....................................................................................................................................41 Discussion ...............................................................................................................................42 6 STUDY 5 ................................................................................................................................46 Method ....................................................................................................................................46 Participants ......................................................................................................................46 Materials ..........................................................................................................................46 Gender role manipulation .........................................................................................46 Outcome variables ....................................................................................................46 Procedure ..................................................................................................................47 Results.....................................................................................................................................47 Discussion ...............................................................................................................................48 7 STUDY 6 ................................................................................................................................51 Method ....................................................................................................................................51 Participants ......................................................................................................................51 Materials ..........................................................................................................................51 Outcome Variables ..........................................................................................................51 Results.....................................................................................................................................52 Discussion ...............................................................................................................................53 8 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................56 Discussion ...............................................................................................................................56 Conclusion ..............................................................................................................................62 APPENDIX A STUDY 1 MANIPULATION ................................................................................................63 B GENDER ROLE BELIEFS SCALE: SHORT FORM (USED IN STUDY 1) ......................66 C ESSENTIALIST BELIEFS SCALE (USED IN STUDY 1) ..................................................67 6 D MANIPULATIONS USED IN STUDY 2 .............................................................................69 E SOCIAL ROLES QUESTIONNAIRE (USED IN STUDIES 2, 3, 4, AND 6) ......................70 F GENDER DETERMINISM SCALE (USED IN STUDY 2) .................................................71
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critically Evaluate the Understanding of Gender As Discourse
    Vol. 1, No. 2 International Education Studies Critically Evaluate the Understanding of Gender as Discourse Changxue Xue College of Foreign languages, Yanshan University Qinhuangdao 066004, China Tel: 86-335-805-8710 Email: [email protected] Abstract In this paper, the author explores the different views on gender and the nature of gender as discourse. Furthermore, the author argues that discursive psychology’s views on gender are convincing and explain more than other perspectives of gender. Keywords: Gender, Essentialism, Constructionism Since the 1950s, an increasing use of the term gender has been seen in the academic literature and the public discourse for distinguishing gender identity from biological sex. Money and Hampson (1955) defined the term gender as what a person says or does to reveal that he or she has the status of being boy or girl, man or woman (masculinity or femininity of a person). Gender is a complex issue, constituents of which encompass styles of dressing, patterns of moving as well as ways of talking rather than just being limited to biological sex. Over the years, the perception of the issue ‘gender’ has been changing and developing from essentialism to social constructionism. Essentialism suggests that gender is a biological sex, by contrast, social constructionism suggests that gender is constructed within a social and cultural discourse. Due to its complex nature, gender intrigues numerous debates over the extent to which gender is a biological construct or a social construct. Social constructionists employ discourse analysis as a method for research on gender identity. Discursive psychology is one of most important approaches within discourse analysis in the field of social psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender/Sex Diversity Beliefs: Heterogeneity, Links to Prejudice, and Diversity-Affirming Interventions by Zachary C
    Gender/Sex Diversity Beliefs: Heterogeneity, Links to Prejudice, and Diversity-Affirming Interventions by Zachary C. Schudson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Psychology and Women’s Studies) in the University of Michigan 2020 Doctoral Committee: Professor Sari van Anders, Co-Chair Professor Susan Gelman, Co-Chair Professor Anna Kirkland Associate Professor Sara McClelland Zach C. Schudson [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1300-5674 © Zach C. Schudson ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the many people who made this dissertation possible. First and foremost, thank you to Dr. Sari van Anders, my dissertation advisor and co-chair and my mentor. I have never met someone more committed to social justice through psychological research or to their students. Your expansive, nuanced thinking about gender and sexuality, your incredible, detailed feedback on everything I wrote, your lightning-quick, thoughtful responses whenever I needed anything, and your persistence in improving communication even when it was difficult all make me feel astoundingly lucky. Despite the many time and energy-intensive challenges you have faced over the last several years, you have done everything you can to facilitate my success as a scholar, all the while showing deep care for my well-being as a person. Thank you also to Dr. Susan Gelman, my dissertation co-chair, for your incredible support these last feW years. Your intellectual generosity is truly a gift; I feel smarter and more capable every time we speak. Thank you to Drs. Sara McClelland and Anna Kirkland, members of my dissertation committee and my teaching mentors.
    [Show full text]
  • Race and Essentialism in Gloria Steinem
    Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 2009 Race and Essentialism in Gloria Steinem Frank Rudy Cooper University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub Part of the Law and Gender Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Cooper, Frank Rudy, "Race and Essentialism in Gloria Steinem" (2009). Scholarly Works. 1123. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/1123 This Article is brought to you by the Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law, an institutional repository administered by the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the William S. Boyd School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Race and Essentialism in Gloria Steinem Frank Rudy Cooper* I. INTRODUCTION A. The Story of My Discovery ofAngela Harris The book that I have referred to the most since law school is Katherine Bartlett and Roseanne Kennedys' anthology FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY. 1 The reason it holds that unique place on my bookshelf is that it contains the first copy I read of Angela Harris's essay Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory.2 My edition now has at least three layers of annotations. As I reread it today, I recall my first reading. I encountered the essay in my law school feminist theory class. Up to the point where we read Harris's article, I was probably a dominance feminist, having found Catherine MacKinnon's theory that women are a group bound together by patriarchal domination to be simpatico with my undergraduate training.
    [Show full text]
  • Delayed Critique: on Being Feminist, Time and Time Again
    Delayed Critique: On Being Feminist, Time and Time Again In “On Being in Time with Feminism,” Robyn Emma McKenna is a Ph.D. candidate in English and Wiegman (2004) supports my contention that history, Cultural Studies at McMaster University. She is the au- theory, and pedagogy are central to thinking through thor of “‘Freedom to Choose”: Neoliberalism, Femi- the problems internal to feminism when she asks: “… nism, and Childcare in Canada.” what learning will ever be final?” (165) Positioning fem- inism as neither “an antidote to [n]or an ethical stance Abstract toward otherness,” Wiegman argues that “feminism it- In this article, I argue for a systematic critique of trans- self is our most challenging other” (164). I want to take phobia in feminism, advocating for a reconciling of seriously this claim in order to consider how feminism trans and feminist politics in community, pedagogy, is a kind of political intimacy that binds a subject to the and criticism. I claim that this critique is both delayed desire for an “Other-wise” (Thobani 2007). The content and productive. Using the Michigan Womyn’s Music of this “otherwise” is as varied as the projects that femi- Festival as a cultural archive of gender essentialism, I nism is called on to justify. In this paper, I consider the consider how rereading and revising politics might be marginalization of trans-feminism across mainstream, what is “essential” to feminism. lesbian feminist, and academic feminisms. Part of my interest in this analysis is the influence of the temporal Résumé on the way in which certain kinds of feminism are given Dans cet article, je défends l’idée d’une critique systéma- primacy in the representation of feminism.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Trans-Feminism: Berlin's Transgender Individuals' Narratives As Contributions to Ethics of Vegetarian Eco- Feminism
    ETHICAL TRANS-FEMINISM: BERLIN’S TRANSGENDER INDIVIDUALS’ NARRATIVES AS CONTRIBUTIONS TO ETHICS OF VEGETARIAN ECO- FEMINISMS By Anja Koletnik Submitted to Central European University Department of Gender Studies In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Gender Studies Supervisor: Assistant Professor Eszter Timár CEU eTD Collection Second Reader: Professor Allaine Cerwonka Budapest, Hungary 2014 Abstract This thesis will explore multi-directional ethical and political implications of meat non- consumption and cisgender non-conformity. My argument will present how applying transgender as an analytical category to vegetarian eco-feminisms, can be contributive in expanding ethical and political solidarity within feminist projects, which apply gender identity politics to their conceptualizations and argumentations. I will outline the potential to transcend usages of gender identity politics upon a cisnormative canon of vegetarian eco-feminisms lead by Carol J. Adams’ The Sexual Politics of Meat (1990). Adams’s canon of vegetarian eco-feminisms appropriates diet as a central resource of their political projects, which contest speciesism and cis-sexism. Like Adams’ canon, my analysis will consider diet as always having political connotations and implications, both for individuals and their embodiments, within broader socio-political realms. Alongside diet, transgender as an analytical category will be employed within analysis, due to its potential of exposing how genders as social categories and constructs are re-formed. My analysis will be based on narrative interviews, which will explore the multi-directional ethical and political implications of meat non-consumption and cisgender non-conformity among members of Berlin’s transgender / cisgender non-conforming and meat non-consuming subcultures.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Wrong with Essentialism?
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by LSE Research Online Anne Phillips What’s wrong with essentialism? Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Phillips, Anne (2010) What’s wrong with essentialism? Distinktion: Scandinavian journal of social theory, 11 (1). pp. 47-60. ISSN 1600-910X DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2010.9672755 © 2010 University of Aarhus This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/30900/ Available in LSE Research Online: April 2012 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final manuscript accepted version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this version and the published version may remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. 1 What’s wrong with essentialism? Anne Phillips This paper identifies and discusses four distinct meanings of essentialism. The first is the attribution of certain characteristics to everyone subsumed within a particular category: the ‘(all) women are caring and empathetic’, ‘(all) Africans have rhythm’, ’(all) Asians are community oriented’ syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Essentialist Beliefs and Social Distance Towards Gay Men and Lesbian Women: a Latent Profile Analysis
    1 Essentialist Beliefs and Social Distance towards Gay Men and Lesbian Women: A Latent Profile Analysis Elena R. Agadullina School of Psychology National Research University Higher School of Economics Moscow, Russia Andrey V. Lovakov Center for Institutional Studies National Research University Higher School of Economics Moscow, Russia Natalia G. Malysheva Faculty of Psychology Lomonosov Moscow State University Moscow, Russia In press Psychology & Sexuality DOI: 10.1080/19419899.2018.1488764 Correspondence should be addressed to Elena Agadullina, [email protected] 2 Abstract Psychological essentialism is the layperson’s belief that social categories are natural and entitative. Studies have shown that essentialist beliefs are strongly connected with different types of prejudice. Previous research into essentialist beliefs predominantly used a variable-centered approach to investigate the relationship between essentialist beliefs and prejudice. Extending this research, we used a person-centered approach to explore the relationship between different essentialist beliefs related to sexual orientation and gender (naturalness, homogeneity, discreteness and informativeness). The study involved 282 (sample 1) and 194 (sample 2) respondents from Russia with different sexual orientations. Using latent profile analysis, we identified three distinct essentialist belief profiles, which are the same for both our target groups, gay men and lesbian women. We examined the relationships between belonging to essentialist belief profiles and social distance
    [Show full text]
  • The Trans Community in the Gender Realism and Gender Nominalism Discourse
    Presented at the DLSU Research Congress 2017 De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines June 20 to 22, 2017 Ontology of Gender: The Trans Community in the Gender Realism and Gender Nominalism Discourse Jerika Limin and Dr. Mark Anthony Dacela1,* 1 Undergraduate Thesis Coordinator, Philosophy Department *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract: The distinction between sex and gender that started with De Beauvoir led to associating gender to cultural and sex to biological. However, queer theorists, such as Butler, pointed out that the sex/gender dichotomy is too simplistic, problematic even, in that it marginalizes other gender, sex and sexuality identities through its hegemonic framework of heteronormativity. The ambiguity now led to asking the fundamental question: What is gender? In return, there are two stances that attempt to answer the ontological aspect. Gender realism states that gender is real in that gender is essential and universal in all human beings. On the other hand, gender nominalism states that gender is not real in that sense but in that it is and ought to be promoted by external factors such as social construction and the foundations for a rigid identity politics. This paper aims to explain the narrative through the defences and drawbacks behind both stances of the debate in order to see the various ways of how feminists account for gender despite having the same objective to abolish oppression that the patriarchy promotes. Furthermore, in order to see the significance of it all further in the present day society, I will bring the debate into the light of the Trans community.
    [Show full text]
  • On Angela Harris's Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory Mary Anne Franks University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2014 I Am/I Am Not: On Angela Harris's Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory Mary Anne Franks University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Law and Gender Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Mary Anne Franks, I Am/I Am Not: On Angela Harris's Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory, 102 Cal. L. Rev. 1053 (2014). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I Am/I Am Not: On Angela Harris's Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory Mary Anne Franks* In 1990, Angela Harris wrote an article that interrogatedthe limitations of feminist legal theory. Nearly a quarter of a century later, the insights and challenges Harris offered in Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory continue to reverberate. The influence of her ideas can be seen in the fractured and passionate conversations about gender, race, and solidarity occurring both inside and outside of academia. In recent years, we have witnessed an explosion of debate of these topics in social media forums such as Twitter and Facebook.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans Cinema and Its Exit Scapes Is the Doctoral Dissertation of Trans- Feminist Scholar and Berlin-Based Activist Wibke Straube
    Linköping Studies in Arts and Science No. 628 2014 Trans embodiment is a growing trope in contemporary film. Particularly since the early 1990s, trans images have become more widespread and frequent within popular culture. Films such as Hedwig and the Angry Inch (2001), Transamerica (2005), Romeos (2011) and Laurence Anyways (2012) have become well-known referents for what is here termed Trans Cinema and for broader cultural understanding of what it means to live in a gender- A Transfeminist Reading of dissident body. Utopian Sensibility and Gender Dissidence in Contemporary Film In conversation with recent transfeminist and queer theory as well as cul- Wibke Straube tural studies, this doctoral thesis by Wibke Straube sets out to investigate the utopian potential of Trans Cinema and makes a novel contribution to the emerging research field of transgender studies. The book offers an entrance to trans films by mapping out the so-called “exit scapes” that appear in scenic moments of dancing, singing or dreaming. These provide openings for alternative ways of imagining reality, and are thus key to the experiencing of trans-affirmative futures. Trans Cinema and iTs exiT sCapes is the doctoral dissertation of trans- feminist scholar and Berlin-based activist Wibke straube. Straube is also a researcher and teacher at Tema Genus (Gender studies), Department of Thematic Studies (Tema), Linköping University, Sweden. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science No. 628, 2014 Wibke Straube Wibke Department of Thematic Studies Gender Studies Linköping University SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden www.liu.se Buch_Wibke_final.indd 1 21.07.14 21:35 Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing Narratives of Gender Essentialism, Heteronormativity, and Queerness in Wiccan Ritual and Theology
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU John Wesley Powell Student Research Conference 2017, 28th Annual JWP Conference Apr 8th, 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM Mother Goddesses and Subversive Witches: Competing Narratives of Gender Essentialism, Heteronormativity, and Queerness in Wiccan Ritual and Theology Carly Floyd Illinois Wesleyan Meghan Burke, Faculty Advisor Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/jwprc Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the Sociology Commons Floyd, Carly and Burke, Faculty Advisor, Meghan, "Mother Goddesses and Subversive Witches: Competing Narratives of Gender Essentialism, Heteronormativity, and Queerness in Wiccan Ritual and Theology" (2017). John Wesley Powell Student Research Conference. 1. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/jwprc/2017/oralpres/1 This Event is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at The Ames Library at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Mother Goddesses
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Gender Theory: Charlotte Witt and Gender Uniessentialism A
    Feminist Gender Theory: Charlotte Witt and Gender Uniessentialism A thesis submitted to the faculty of the Athenaeum of Ohio/Mount St. Mary’s Seminary of the West in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts (Catholic Studies) By Jonathan M. Jergens Cincinnati, Ohio May 2018 Abstract Professor Charlotte Witt, of the University of New Hampshire, has developed a new gender theory that is unique in the contemporary feminist movement. Her gender theory rests on a form of essentialism called “uniessentialism.” The primary aim of this thesis is to articulate Witt’s theory, and specifically that of uniessentialism, in light of Aristotle. Aristotle serves as a foundation for many of Witt’s arguments, including essentialism, which will be analyzed. This thesis will seek to clarify Witt’s gender theory and enable a reader, in light of various perspectives and critiques of her theory, to make a determination on whether her theory is coherent. Several analyses on Witt’s gender theory will be presented, including contemporary feminist critiques of her position, a critique of biology and sexual difference in light of her arguments, an analysis of a traditional understanding of essence, and ending with an alternative view of gender from a combined Aristotelian/Thomistic viewpoint. The author maintains a neutral position while articulating the theory of Witt and Aristotle and the critiques in the final chapter. However, with respect to Witt’s theory, the author’s biases include disagreement on the reality of sexual difference, disagreement on her explanation of personhood and the social individual, and disagreement about essentialism and the constitution view.
    [Show full text]