DOCSLIB.ORG

POLS-4105-Midterm-1-Review.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
POLS-4105-Midterm-1-Review.Pdf POLS 4105 Name_____________________________________ Spring 2020 Midterm 1 Review Midterm 1 will cover Clinton (1994); Cox (2000); the prologue and Chapters 1 and 3 of American Creation; Chapters 2 and 3 of Founding Brothers; Dougherty and Heckelman (2006); Robertson (2006); Clinton and Meirowitz (2004); Aldrich and Grant (1993); How a Bill Becomes a Law; John Adams, Episode 2; the Constitution and the impact of primaries. For the scholarly articles, students should pay particular interest in the “sell” (i.e. the explanation for why is this topic important), the conventional wisdom, the author’s theory/argument, their data, dependent and independent variables and any weaknesses in the paper discussed in class or other assigned work. For the book chapters and lectures, students should pay close attention to concepts listed in the outlines. The Exam will feature ten matching questions; 30 multiple choice questions, 1 game tree exercise and two short essays. Example questions for each section are provided below, as are four short essay questions. Of these, three will appear on the exam. I. Sample Matching Questions Part 1 – Matching: For each term or concept below, write the letter of the appropriate match in the blank. (10 Questions, 1 point each) 1. personal power __________ a) popular sovereignty 2. Thomas Jefferson _________ b) South Carolinian delegate to the Continental Congress – he opposed Adams and independence. 3. John Rutledge__________ c) author of the Declaration of Independence 4. John Locke___________ d) expertise, mastery of parliamentary tactics II. Sample Multiple Choice Questions Part 2 – Multiple Choice: For each of the following questions, circle the letter corresponding to the answer that is most appropriate. (30 questions, 2 points each) 1. Which of the following events occurred first? a) The Annapolis Convention was called b) Shay’s Rebellion c) George Washington is elected president d) The Constitution was ratified 2. Which of the following is evidence used by Aldrich and Grant (1993) to further their argument? a) Voting data from the Constitutional Convention that shows Anti-Federalists were far more likely than Federalists to support the New Jersey Plan b) Voting data from the first Congress that shows Anti-Federalists make up a very large part of the opposition of measures that were seen to strengthen the national government c) Voting data from the first Congress that shows Anti-Federalists make up a comparatively smaller part of the opposition of measures that were seen to strengthen the national government d) Case studies that demonstrate support for the Connecticut compromise mostly came from members who would later affiliate with the Federalist party in the first Congress 3. Robertson (2006) makes four primary criticisms of Dougherty and Heckelman (2006). Which of the following is NOT a criticism made by Robertson? a) They are examining different questions b) Members may be voting in a non-sincere fashion c) Rules are inherently exogenous structures d) Sequence matters 4. Which of the following is a conclusion consistent with arguments made by Clinton (1994)? a) Marbury v. Madison was a political masterpiece in which Chief Justice John Marshall “outfoxed” President Thomas Jefferson. b) Marbury v. Madison can best be viewed as a type of “game,” in which Chief Justice Marshall and President Jefferson were pitted against each other with neither side winning a clear advantage. c) One can consider Marbury a game, where both sides engaged in mutually assured destruction, and the resulting outcome was abhorrent to both sides. d) To the extent that Marbury was a “political” decision, it seems to have been tacit political compromise between two figures who have most often been considered mortal enemies in the drama of the United States constitutional history, not a “game” with a clear winner and loser. 5. Which of the following was a central feature of the New Jersey Plan? a) Broad judicial review for the courts b) A single executive who could not be removed from office by the legislature c) More narrow legislative authority than was provided for by the Articles of Confederation d) A single house chamber with equal representation for each state regardless of population 6. A situation where something gained by one side is counterbalanced by an equal loss by the other side is referred to as what? a) An empty set b) A condorcet winner c) An equilibrium d) Zero-sum 7. Which of the following states did NOT send delegates to the Constitutional Convention? a) New York b) New Hampshire c) Rhode Island d) Georgia 8. Which of the following was a way the founders checked the executive’s power? a) they providing that only Congress could declare war b) mandated that the President could only serve two terms c) allowed only a simple-majority of the Senate to override the veto d) providing that the House confirm appointments to executive departments 9. Which of the following did not author any of the Federalist Papers? a) James Madison b) John Jay c) Alexander Hamilton d) Patrick Henry 10. A competitive Democratic challenger in the upcoming election should make Senator Steve Perry (R- VA) ____________ likely to vote for a conservative Republican Health Care Bill. A competitive Republican challenger in the upcoming primary election would make him ___________ to support it. a) Less; more b) Less; less c) More; less d) More; more 11. Which of the following is NOT an enumerated power given to Congress by the Constitution in Article I, section VIII of the Constitution? a) To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries b) To regulate commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes c) To negate all laws passed by the several States, contravening in the opinion of the National Legislature the articles of Union; and to call forth the force of the Union against any member of the Union failing to fulfill its duty under the articles thereof. d) To declare War, grant letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water III. Sample Game Tree Part 3 – Game Tree Exercise. Please show work if necessary (3 questions, 10 points total). As the chief of staff to Democratic President Kip Winger, you are tasked with helping the President pass a bill allocating funds to starving otters. The President's party enjoys substantial majorities in both chambers of Congress. President Winger would like to work with House minority leader Dee Snyder (R- NY) to pass a bipartisan bill. However, should Snyder reject the bill endorsed by the President, one of two policies would be enacted. First, Winger could opt to not pass any bill, in which case the status quo conservative policy of 1,000,000 dollars per year of otter funding will be in place. Second, with substantial Democratic majorities in both chambers, Winger could support a liberal measure sponsored by Representative Joe Elliott (D-MA)—which could be passed on a straight party vote. The President will only consider the Elliott bill or status quo if the minority leader rejects one of the bipartisan bills he publically endorses. Specifically, the President is considering endorsing one of three bills. A liberal measure sponsored by Representative Stephen Erica Pearcy (D-CA), a moderate measure endorsed by Senator Tom Araya (D- FL), and a slightly more conservative bill authored by Representative Scott Ian (R-PA). The President prefers any of the bipartisan bills to either the status quo or the partisan Elliott measure. Specifically, he would rather have the Pearcy bill to the Araya bill to the Ian measure to the Elliott bill to the status quo. Minority leader Snyder would rather have the status quo to any of the bills endorsed by the President. Specifically, he would prefer the status quo to the Ian bill to the measure written by Araya to the partisan Elliott bill to the Pearcy bill. Using your knowledge of both President Winger and Minority Leader Snyder’s preferences and game theory, answer the following questions: 1. If President Winger endorses the Pearcy bill, what is Snyder going to do? Why? 2. If President Winger endorses the Ian bill, what is Snyder going to do? Why? 3. Knowing what you know about Snyder's preferences, what would you advise President Winger to do? Why? IV. Short Essay Questions Part 4 – Short essay questions. Choose two of three. You can use the back of the page. (10 points each) 1. It’s 2020 and you have recently been given a job as a top advisor to Democratic presidential candidate Steve Perry. A “gotcha journalist” asks your candidate why he thinks America was successful in breaking away from Great Britain. He stumbles in his response, stating that “America was well-suited to gain independence because of patriotism, freedom, liberty and Paul Revere’s midnight jog.” Before the journalist asks him a follow-up question, you need to lean over and give him a better answer. What do you say? 2. Congratulations! After graduating from the University in Georgia you accepted a position as Chief of Staff to recently-elected Georgia Senator Ryan Seacrest. Senator Seacrest campaigned as a bipartisan reformer. Now elected, he is planning to invite Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) over for dinner. You have been tasked with cooking a lasagna and ordering a honey baked ham. Seacrest’s plan is to recreate a grand bargain like the one between Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton historian Joseph Ellis describes in his chapter “The Dinner.” Unfortunately, he has forgotten the details of that bargain.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Course Syllabus; History 1301: ZC1--U.S. History to 1877 Fall 2020
    Course Syllabus; History 1301: ZC1--U.S. History to 1877 Fall 2020/ Dr. Mark Saad Saka//Sul Ross State University Office Hours: Lawrence Hall 208B/ 432-837-8304; [email protected] M, W, F 10:00-10:45/1:00-1:45/////T, Th 1:15-2:00; Office Hours can also be made with an appointment. Course Objectives The objective of this course is to introduce you to the sweeping epic of American history from the colonial era through the American Civil War and Reconstruction, U.S. History to 1877. Course Readings www.americanyawp.com This is a free online textbook Course Requirements There are a number of requirements for this course. 1. Although this is a zoom course, regular attendance is still expected. This course is based on both lectures and the textbook readings; and without regular attendance and taking notes, successful completion of this course will be difficult. 2. You will be required to turn in regular weekly written assignments (through Blackboard). The written assignments are due on the Sunday evening after the week of lectures and readings by 12:00 p.m. The written assignments cover the chapter readings (secondary source), the lectures, and also the documents assigned which can be found at the end of each chapter (primary source) Course Grading: There will be two written assignments per week for a total of 28 (14 weekly writing assignments), based on the lectures, chapters and questions found at the end of each chapter of your online textbook www.americanyawp.com. The writing assignments are due through blackboard and the assignment dates are found in the syllabus as well as blackboard.
    [Show full text]
  • American Political Development Political Science 4105 Fall 2014 Baldwin 301 TTR 8:00-9:15Am
    American Political Development Political Science 4105 Fall 2014 Baldwin 301 TTR 8:00-9:15am Instructor: Anthony Madonna Office: 407 Baldwin Hall Email: [email protected] Hours: TTR 11:00-12:00pm Website: spia.uga.edu/facultypages/ajmadonn/ Phone: (314) 313-9937 Course Description: The primary goal of this course is to familiarize the student with American political history and development. The class will focus on the development of American political issues and institutions from the late 18th century through the 19th century. Throughout the semester, we will focus on topics including: the failure of the Articles of Confederation, the Constitutional Convention, the creation of American political parties, slavery, the Civil War and the development of House and Senate rules. Particular attention will be given to how these events influence policy-making in contemporary American politics. Books and Readings: The following books are required and can be purchased from amazon.com and at the Campus Bookstore: Ellis, Joseph. 2001. Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. Ellis, Joseph. 2007. American Creation: Triumphs and Tragedies at the Founding of the Republic. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. Holt, Michael F. 2004. The Fate of Their Country. New York, NY: Hill and Wang. Students will not only be expected to have done the reading assignments, but should also be aware of relevant news stories. As such, I recommend reading a daily newspaper { such as the New York Times and/or the Washington Post { or at least checking cnn.com. Other political blogs that students may find useful include FiveThirtyEight, Political Wire, The Monkey Cage, The Upshot, Vox and the Drudge Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Jefferson and the Ideology of Democratic Schooling
    Thomas Jefferson and the Ideology of Democratic Schooling James Carpenter (Binghamton University) Abstract I challenge the traditional argument that Jefferson’s educational plans for Virginia were built on mod- ern democratic understandings. While containing some democratic features, especially for the founding decades, Jefferson’s concern was narrowly political, designed to ensure the survival of the new republic. The significance of this piece is to add to the more accurate portrayal of Jefferson’s impact on American institutions. Submit your own response to this article Submit online at democracyeducationjournal.org/home Read responses to this article online http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol21/iss2/5 ew historical figures have undergone as much advocate of public education in the early United States” (p. 280). scrutiny in the last two decades as has Thomas Heslep (1969) has suggested that Jefferson provided “a general Jefferson. His relationship with Sally Hemings, his statement on education in republican, or democratic society” views on Native Americans, his expansionist ideology and his (p. 113), without distinguishing between the two. Others have opted suppressionF of individual liberties are just some of the areas of specifically to connect his ideas to being democratic. Williams Jefferson’s life and thinking that historians and others have reexam- (1967) argued that Jefferson’s impact on our schools is pronounced ined (Finkelman, 1995; Gordon- Reed, 1997; Kaplan, 1998). because “democracy and education are interdependent” and But his views on education have been unchallenged. While his therefore with “education being necessary to its [democracy’s] reputation as a founding father of the American republic has been success, a successful democracy must provide it” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Loyalists in War, Americans in Peace: the Reintegration of the Loyalists, 1775-1800
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 Aaron N. Coleman University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Coleman, Aaron N., "LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800" (2008). University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 620. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/620 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF DISSERATION Aaron N. Coleman The Graduate School University of Kentucky 2008 LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 _________________________________________________ ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION _________________________________________________ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky By Aaron N. Coleman Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Daniel Blake Smith, Professor of History Lexington, Kentucky 2008 Copyright © Aaron N. Coleman 2008 iv ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION LOYALISTS IN WAR, AMERICANS IN PEACE: THE REINTEGRATION OF THE LOYALISTS, 1775-1800 After the American Revolution a number of Loyalists, those colonial Americans who remained loyal to England during the War for Independence, did not relocate to the other dominions of the British Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Argument
    AP United States Government and Politics Mr. Lindley 2017 Summer Reading Guide The Argument Understanding the Constitutional underpinnings of the US government is crucial to understanding many factors of today’s politics and institutions. Much of the groundwork was laid in the 1780s, between the end of the Revolutionary War and the ratification of the Constitution. Before our first day of class, please read the chapter from Joseph Ellis’s book American Creation entitled “The Argument.” This reading first delves into the problems America faced under the Articles of the Confederation, then into the Constitutional Convention, and finally the debate over ratification. One of the central figures is James Madison of Virginia, who played a crucial role in both drafting the Constitution and securing its ratification. As you read, please answer the following study guide questions. Please use complete sentences and, where appropriate, cite specific quotes from the text. Each response should be a short paragraph. These will be collected the first day of class. 1. Describe the national government under the Articles of Confederation. What were the views Americans had of their national government at the end of the Revolutionary War in 1783? 2. Why were Americans skeptical of strong central governmental power? How did James Madison and George Washington differ from most Americans in their views? 3. Describe the four key events of 1786 that the text states were catalysts for the Constitutional Convention. 4. What was the ideal that Madison had of what the national government should be? What “vices” did he see in the state governments? 5.
    [Show full text]
  • George Washington: Progenitor of American Public Administration Theory Scott A
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2012 George Washington: Progenitor of American Public Administration Theory Scott A. (Scott Alan) Cook Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PUBLIC POLICY GEORGE WASHINGTON: PROGENITOR OF AMERICAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION THEORY By SCOTT A. COOK A Dissertation submitted to the Reubin O’D. Askew School of Public Administration and Policy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2012 Scott A. Cook defended this dissertation on June 22, 2012. The members of the supervisory committee were: William Earle Klay Professor Directing Dissertation Deana Rohlinger University Representative Ralph Brower Committee Member Lance deHaven-Smith Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii I dedicate this to my wife Thanks for doing everything else so that I could do this iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am forever grateful to my committee chair, Earle Klay. His intellectual guidance, humble mentorship, and unselfish patience made this dissertation process an enjoyable success. I am also thankful to my committee members, Deana Rohlinger, Ralph Brower, and Lance deHaven-Smith. Their insightful comments and feedback enhanced the quality of this research project beyond my natural abilities. Each member provided inspiration that became tangible parts of my dissertation. I also acknowledge the contributions of my friends and colleagues at the Air Command and Staff College.
    [Show full text]
  • What Would Madison Think? the Irony of the Twists and Turns of Federalism
    WHAT WOULD MADISON THINK? THE IRONY OF THE TWISTS AND TURNS OF FEDERALISM BY E. NORMAN VEASEY* ABSTRACT As one of the "FoundingBrothers, "James Madisonpromoted a vision ofAmericanfederalism based on a nationalgovernment with strongpowers. But in order to navigate the competing views represented in the Consti- tutional Convention and to marshal the nascent Constitution through the ratificationprocess, Madison became nimble in his view of the federal structure. The Constitution he drafted ultimately left blurred the line delineatingfederal and state powers, allowing Madison and his colleagues to win the support of both those who favored and those who feared a strong nationalgovernment. That blurry line, and the two centuries of judicial gloss on the contours of that line, have createda "Fogof Federalism"in which Congress and federal agencies frequently grope around hastily and randomly in response to any perceived crisis of the day. In recent years, the federalism tensions in the corporategovernance arena have been particularlyacute, as federal legislators and regulators have made incursions into the internal corporateaffairs traditionallygoverned by state corporatelaw. After a glimpse of the historical context that gave rise to American federalism, this article surveys recent ad hoc federalization of internal corporate affairs. It then suggests that it might be time for a respected institution such as the American Law Institute or others to undertake a comprehensiveanalysis offederal/stateauthority, both generallyand in the corporategovernance arena in particular. I. INTRODUCTION I would like to begin with a retrospective-looking far back into the rearview mirror to the eighteenth-century thinking of the "Founding 'Former Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court, now a Senior Partner of the firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, in Wilmington, Delaware, and New York, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Burke and His Time, Volume 23 (2013)
    STUDIES IN BURKE AND HIS TIME AND HIS STUDIES IN BURKE I N THE N EXT I SS UE ... S TEVEN P. M ILLIE S STUDIES IN The Inner Light of Edmund Burke A N D REA R A D A S ANU Edmund Burke’s Anti-Rational Conservatism R O B ERT H . B ELL The Sentimental Romances of Lawrence Sterne AND HIS TIME J.D. C . C LARK A Rejoinder to Reviews of Clark’s Edition of Burke’s Reflections Aaron D. Hoffman R EVIEW S O F Joseph MEllis’sICHAEL Burkean B ROWN Founding The Meal at the Saracen’s Head: Edmund Burke F . P. L OCK , Edmund Burke Volume II: 1784 – 1797 Elizabethand the Scottish Lambert Literati S EAN P ATRICK D ONLAN , Edmund Burke’s Irish Identities M ICHAELThe Scholarly F UNK DFactoriesECKAR D N EIL M C A RTHUR , David Hume’s Political Theory Wonder and Beauty in Burke’s Philosophical Enquiry Jeffrey O. Nelson E LIZA B ETH L A MB ERT , Edmund Burke of Beaconsfield R O B ERT H . B ELL Fool for Love: Burke’sThe Sentimental American Romances Characters of Laurence Sterne SJosephTEVEN P.Pappin M ILLIE IIIS The Inner Light of Edmund Burke: A Biographical Approach toEdmund Burke’s Religious Burke andFaith Leo and Strauss Epistemology and STUDIES IN the Charge of ‘Historicism’ VOLUME 22 2011 reviews of Ian Crowe. Patriotism and Public Spirit: Edmund Burke and the Role of the CriticREVIEW in Mid-Eighteenth-CenturyS O F Britain; Corey Robin, The Reactionary Mind: AND HIS TIME F.P.LOCK, Edmund Burke: Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Academic Advising Programs
    Registration and Enrollment ........................................................... 25 Table of Contents Academic Advising Programs ........................................................ 26 Academic Calendar, 2016-2017 ............................................................. 3 Communications with Faculty/Staff ................................................ 27 Disclaimer Information ............................................................................ 5 Class Attendance ........................................................................... 27 The College ............................................................................................ 6 Academic Honesty ......................................................................... 28 History of the College ...................................................................... 6 Examinations .................................................................................. 28 The Honor Code .............................................................................. 9 Grades ........................................................................................... 28 Study Abroad Opportunities ........................................................... 10 Class Standing ............................................................................... 29 The Sandor Teszler Library ........................................................... 10 Academic Honors ........................................................................... 29 Emerging Leaders Initiative
    [Show full text]
  • History 101A Is a Chronological Survey of American History to 1840, Focusing on American Social, Intellectual, Political and Diplomatic Institutions
    B.A. Program in Liberal Studies HIS 101A: United States History to 1840 2 Semester Units Fall Semester 2012 (Summer & Fall Quarters 2012) Instructor: Steve Anderson, M.A. Class Meeting Times & Place: Week of August 20, 2012-Week of December 16, 2012 (2.5 hours per week, 16 weeks); DaVinci Science: Room 105 Office Hours: Mon & Wed 8:00-9:00 AM and by appointment Email: [email protected] Course Description: History 101A is a chronological survey of American History to 1840, focusing on American social, intellectual, political and diplomatic institutions. Major topics in the course include the nation’s culture and diversity and the role of the U.S. during the period within the broader context of world history. The main goal of this course is to prepare student with the analytic and critical thinking skills necessary to be successful students in courses at the college level. Students will be challenged to think critically and to analyze diverse social perspectives, historical narratives and varied interpretations of U.S. History Antioch University B.A. Program Learning Objectives: • Critical and analytical thinking ability; • The ability to understand issues from multiple perspectives; • The ability to connect learning to lived experience; • Social awareness, community engagement, global citizenship; • Core competency in foundational skills: including, writing, quantitative reasoning, information literacy, technological literacy, oral communication, and research. Course Description and Learning Objectives: Students will be challenged to think critically and to analyze diverse social perspectives, historical narratives and varied interpretations of U.S. History. Students successfully completing History 101A will become conversant with the basic outline of the history of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • HIST 1501 Sample Syllabus (PDF)
    University of Connecticut – Torrington Instructor: Robert P. Forbes History 1501 Department of History Fall 2009 Office Hours: Thursdays 3:30 – 5:30 Wednesdays 3:45 – 6:15 Office Phone: (860) 626-6891 The United States to 1877 This course has two principal aims: to give you a good basic grounding in the foundations of society in the United States, and to introduce you to the discipline of history, and the process of thinking historically. Some of the themes we will explore will include the exploration, conquest, and settlement of the land; the impact of the environment on culture, and vice-versa; the formation of national identity, and the question of American “exceptionalism.” The following required books may be purchased at the Coop: John M. Murrin, Paul E. Johnson, et al., Liberty, Equality, Power, vol. I: to 1877, Enhanced Concise Fourth Edition (Thompson, 2009) Paul Finkelman and Donald R. Kennon, eds., Congress and the Emergence of Sectionalism. Ohio University Press, 2008. Joseph Ellis, American Creation: Triumphs and Tragedies in the Founding of the Republic (Vintage, 2008) Bruce Levine, Half Slave and Half Free: The Roots of Civil War (Hill & Wang, 2005) Eric Foner, A Short History of Reconstruction (Harper Perennial, 1990) In addition, there will be numerous readings (marked with a ) posted to the class’s HuskyCT site; the readings marked OLR are in the On-Line Reserve section. The site also contains links to useful websites and other on-line resources. Please see me if you have questions about how to access or use HuskyCT. Special Events. Class Requirements Your input is essential, and so attendance is mandatory.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles of Confederation and the Constitution C O Nt E Nt S
    Chapter Nine: Articles of Confederation and the Constitution C o nt e nt s 9.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 381 9.1.1Learning Outcomes .......................................................................................381 9.2THE STATE GOVERNMENTS .............................................................................. 383 9.2.1The Need for New Constitutions ....................................................................... 383 9.2.2 Political Thought Shaping the State Constitutions ............................................... 384 The Structure of Government ...............................................................................385 The Role of the Governor ..................................................................................... 386 The Nature of Representation in the Legislatures .................................................... 387 9.2.3 Divisions on the Road to Republican Government ............................................. 389 Pennsylvania ................................................................................................... 389 Massachusetts.................................................................................................390 New Jersey ...................................................................................................... 392 9.2.4 Before You Move On... .................................................................................. 394 Key Concepts ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]