Hymenosporum Flavum Native Frangipanni

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Plant of the Week Hymenosporum flavum Native Frangipanni The heady perfume of Native Frangipanni should give you an inkling as to its relationship to another fragrant shrub, namely the sweetly scented Native Daphne (Pittosporum undulation) that occurs so commonly around Sydney. Both belong to the plant family Pittosporaceae. However, Native Frangipanni prefers a warmer climate and even though it has been recorded from the Grose River west of Sydney, it is more common in forests and woodland along the coast and ranges of northern NSW and Queensland. It has been a popular garden plant in Sydney for more than a hundred years, probably partly because it is a slender tree that doesn’t grow too tall (10 metres at most) and partly because the fragrance of its flowers at this time of year is totally awesome. Native Frangipanni, by the way, isn’t even closely related to Frangipanni (Plumeria rubra) which belongs in the family Apocynaceae. The name Hymenosporum comes from two words, Hymen – a membrane, and spora – seed, a reference to the winged seed. Flavum here means yellow and refers to the colour of the flowers that start life cream and turn dark apricot orange as they age. Botanists refer to Hymenosporum flavum as a monotypic genus, in other words, there is only one species in the genus. Map modified from: Australian Native Plant Society, http://anpsa.org.au/h-fla.html Image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hymenosporum Image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frangipani Alison Downing & Kevin Downing, 1.11.2010 (唐爱森, 唐科文－2010 年 11 月 1 日) Downing Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences Hymenosporum flavum Sorry, not related! Native Frangipanni Frangipanni – Plumeria rubra .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Pittosporum Angustifolium
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Southern Queensland ePrints University of Southern Queensland An investigation of the ecology and bioactive compounds of Pittosporum angustifolium endophytes A Thesis Submitted by Michael Thompson Bachelor of Science USQ For the Award of Honours in Science 2014 Abstract Endophytes are microorganisms that reside in the internal tissue of living plants without causing any apparent negative effects to the host. Endophytes are known to produce bioactive compounds and are looked upon as a promising source of novel bioactive compounds. There is currently limited knowledge of Australian endophytes regarding the species diversity, ecological roles and their potential as producers of antimicrobial compounds. The plant Pittosporum angustifolium was used medicinally by Indigenous Australians to treat a variety of conditions such as eczema, coughs and colds. In this study the diversity of endophytic species, host-preference of endophytes and antimicrobial potential of the resident endophytes is investigated in P. angustifolium. During this study a total of 54 endophytes were cultured from leaf samples of seven different P. angustifolium plants. Using molecular identification methods, the ITS-rDNA and SSU-rDNA regions of fungal and bacterial endophytes respectively were sequenced and matched to species recorded in GenBank. This approach, however, could not identify all isolates to the species level. Analysing the presence/absence of identified isolates in each of the seven trees found no evidence to indicate any host-specific relationships. Screening of each isolated endophyte against four human pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans) found two species displaying antimicrobial activity.
[Show full text]
Pittosporum Tobira – Mock Orange
Pittosporum tobira – Mock Orange Common Name(s): Japanese pittosporum, Mock Orange, Pittosporum Cultivar(s): Variegata, Mojo, Cream de Mint Categories: Shrub Habit: Evergreen Height/Width: 8 to 12 feet tall and 4 to 8 feet wide; some dwarf varieties available Hardiness: Zones 7 to 10 Foliage: Alternate, simple, leathery, lustrous dark green leaves; 1.5 to 4 inches long Flower: 2 to 3 inch clusters of fragrant flowers in late spring Flower Color: creamy white Site/Sun: Sun to shade; Well-drained soil Form: Stiff branches; dense broad spreading mound Regions: Native to Japan and China; grows well in the Coastal Plains and Eastern Piedmont of North Carolina. Comments: Tough and durable plant that tolerates drought, heat, and salt spray. It can be severely pruned. However, heavy pruning may cause blooming to be reduced. The plant is frequently damaged by deer. Variegated pittosporum. Photo Karen Russ Pittosporum tobira growth habit. Photo Scott Zona Currituck Master Gardeners Plant of the Month – December 2017 When, Where, and How to Plant Pittosporums are very tolerant of a range of soil conditions, as long as the soil is well drained. Poor drainage or excessive moisture can lead to rapid death from root rot diseases. So, avoid planting in areas where water accumulates after rains. They grow well in both full sun and shade, and are very heat tolerant. Pittosporums can suffer from cold damage if they are grown in the upper Piedmont or Mountain regions of North Carolina. Growing Tips and Propagation This shrub is relatively low maintenance and can be pruned at any time during the year.
[Show full text]
Auranticarpa Rhombifolia (A.Cunn
Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants - Online edition Auranticarpa rhombifolia (A.Cunn. ex Hook.) L.Cayzer, Crisp & I.Telford Family: Pittosporaceae Cayzer, L.W., Crisp, M.D. & Telford, I.R.H. (2000) Aust. Syst. Bot. 13(6): 907-909. Common name: Diamond leaf Laurel; Hollywood; Queensland Pittosporum; White Holly Stem Tree up to 25 metres. Bark pale grey, fissured, more or less corky. Leaves Alternate, commonly clustered in pseudo-whorls behind terminal bud, without stipules; petioles short, Flowers. CC-BY: APII, ANBG. 5-15 mm. Blades obovate to elliptic, coarsely toothed in distal half or entire, glabrous, 5-12 cm long, 3-5 cm wide; pinnately veined with 11-15 pairs of secondary veins each side of midvein; secondary veins distinct to raised on both surfaces; apex acuminate, blunt; base markedly attenuate. Flowers In axillary corymbs or panicles; strongly fragrant; sepals 5, free, cream to white, 1-2 mm long; petals 5, free, much longer than sepals, white to cream, 5-6 mm long; stamens 5, free; anthers 2-3 mm long, dorsifixed on filaments that taper from a broad base; gynoecium superior and borne on a prominent gynophore; locules 2 (3). Fruit. CC-BY: APII, ANBG. Fruit An obovoid, yellow-orange capsule, opening to release one or more black seeds that are not embedded in a sticky matrix; locules 2 (or 3); placentation axile. Seedlings Seed germination time ca. 84 days. Cotyledons ovate or lanceolate, about 15-22 x 4-8 mm. First pair of leaves alternate, rhomboid or obovate, lobed or coarsely toothed towards the apex. Tenth leaf stage not available but probably: leaf blade margin toothed.
[Show full text]
Pittosporum Viridiflorum Cape Pittosporum Pittosporaceae
Pittosporum viridiflorum Cape pittosporum Pittosporaceae Forest Starr, Kim Starr, and Lloyd Loope United States Geological Survey--Biological Resources Division Haleakala Field Station, Maui, Hawai'i May, 2003 OVERVIEW Pittosporum viridiflorum (Cape pittosporum), native to South Africa, is cultivated in Hawai'i as an ornamental plant (Wagner et al. 1999). In Hawai'i, P. viridiflorum was first collected in 1954. It has spread from plantings via bird dispersed seeds and is now naturalized on the islands of Hawai'i, Lana'i, and Maui (Starr et al. 1999, Wagner et al. 1999). Due to its relative small distribution and potential threat, P. viridiflorum is targeted for control by the Big Island Invasive Committee (BIISC) on Hawai'i and is a potential future target for control by the Maui Invasive Species Committee (MISC) on Maui. The Lana'i population could also be evaluated for control. TAXONOMY Family: Pittosporaceae (Pittosporum family) (Wagner et al. 1999). Latin name: Pittosporum viridiflorum Sims (Wagner et al. 1999). Synonyms: None known. Common names: Cape pittosporum, cheesewood (Wagner et al. 1999, Matshinyalo and Reynolds 2002). Taxonomic notes: Pittosporaceae is a family made up of 9 genera and about 200 species from tropical and warm termperate areas of the Old World, being best developed in Australia (Wagner et al. 1999). The genus Pittosporum is made up of about 150 species of tropical and subtropical Africa, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, and some Pacific Islands (Wagner et al. 1999). Nomenclature: The genus name, Pittosporum, is derived from the Greek word, pittos, meaning pitch, and sporos, meaning seeds, in reference to the black seeds covered with viscid resin (Wagner et al.
[Show full text]
A Study of Changing Garden Styles and Practices in Post War Suburban
13' 1.qt I '; l- MITCHAM'S FRONT GARDENS I t- i' L I I I I I I A STUDY OF CHANGING GARDEN STYLES AND PRACTICES iI I IN POST WAR SUBURBAN ADEI,\IDE by Elizabeth Margaret Caldicott, B.A. A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography University of Adelaide March 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE PACE (i) TABLE OF CONTENTS (ii) LIST OF TABLES (ix) LIST OF MAPS (x) LIST OF FICURES (xi) LIST OF PIATES (xiii) ABSTRACT (xv) DECIARATION (xvii) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (xviii) 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background to and aims of the investigation 2 1.1.1 Part I - Ideas for garden studies 2 1.1.2 Part II - The detailed case study 7 1.2 lssues to be investigated 7 1.3 Mitcham City Council - the fieldwork case study area 8 PART I IDEAS FOR GARDEN STUDIES 2. Ideas for garden studies - a review of literature 11 2.1 Academic papers 11 2.2 Urban and environmental commentaries 18 2.3 Historians 19 2.4 Historical popular gardening literature 20 2.4.1 Early South Australian gardening guides 22 2.4.2 Specialist writers 24 2.4.3 Early works on Australian native flora 26 (i i) Page 2.5 Early Australian gardens 28 2.6 Towards an Australian garden ethos 30 2.7 Summary 36 3 A history of garden design to the present 37 3.1 Cardens in history 37 3.1.1 The ancient gardens 39 3.1.2 The Renaissance 40 3.1.3 The English garden tradition 41 3.1.4 Victoriana - the picturesque garden 42 3.1.5 North American gardens 43 3.1.6 Present day linl<s with the past 45 3.2 The Botanic Cardens of Adelaide 45 3.3 Modern Australian suburban gardens 47 3.3.1 Adelaide's early colonial gardens 49 3.3.2 1900-1945 gardens in Adelaide 50 3.3.3 Post World War ll gardens - 1945-1970 51 3.3.4 i 970s to the present 53 3.4 The cultivation of Australian native plants 54 3.5 The rise and demise of the 'all native' garden 56 3.6 Conclusions and Hypotheses 1 and 2 57 4.
[Show full text]
Brisbane Native Plants by Suburb
INDEX - BRISBANE SUBURBS SPECIES LIST Acacia Ridge. ...........15 Chelmer ...................14 Hamilton. .................10 Mayne. .................25 Pullenvale............... 22 Toowong ....................46 Albion .......................25 Chermside West .11 Hawthorne................. 7 McDowall. ..............6 Torwood .....................47 Alderley ....................45 Clayfield ..................14 Heathwood.... 34. Meeandah.............. 2 Queensport ............32 Trinder Park ...............32 Algester.................... 15 Coopers Plains........32 Hemmant. .................32 Merthyr .................7 Annerley ...................32 Coorparoo ................3 Hendra. .................10 Middle Park .........19 Rainworth. ..............47 Underwood. ................41 Anstead ....................17 Corinda. ..................14 Herston ....................5 Milton ...................46 Ransome. ................32 Upper Brookfield .......23 Archerfield ...............32 Highgate Hill. ........43 Mitchelton ...........45 Red Hill.................... 43 Upper Mt gravatt. .......15 Ascot. .......................36 Darra .......................33 Hill End ..................45 Moggill. .................20 Richlands ................34 Ashgrove. ................26 Deagon ....................2 Holland Park........... 3 Moorooka. ............32 River Hills................ 19 Virginia ........................31 Aspley ......................31 Doboy ......................2 Morningside. .........3 Robertson ................42 Auchenflower
[Show full text]
2018 Recommended Street Tree Species List San Francisco Urban Forestry Council Approved [Date]
2018 Recommended Street Tree Species List San Francisco Urban Forestry Council Approved [date] The Urban Forestry Council annually reviews and updates this list of trees in collaboration with public and non-profit urban forestry stakeholders, including San Francisco Public Works – Bureau of Urban Forestry and Friends of the Urban Forest. While this list recommends species that are known to do well in many locations in San Francisco, no tree is perfect for every potential tree planting location. This list should be used as a guideline for choosing which street tree to plant but should not be used without the help of an arborist or other tree professional. All street trees must be approved by Public Works before planting. The application form to plant a street tree can be found on their website: http://sfpublicworks.org/plant-street-tree Photo by Scott Szarapka on Unsplash 1 Section 1: Tree species, varieties, and cultivars that do well in most locations in San Francisco. Size Evergreen/ Species Notes Deciduous Small Evergreen Laurus nobilis ‘Saratoga’ Saratoga bay laurel Uneven performer, prefers heat, needs some Less than wind protection, susceptible to pests 20’ tall at Magnolia grandiflora ‘Little Gem’ Little Gem magnolia maturity Deciduous Crataegus phaenopyrum Washington hawthorn Subject to pests, has thorns, may be susceptible to fireblight. Medium Evergreen Agonis flexuosa (green) peppermint willow Standard green-leaf species only. ‘After Dark’ 20-35’ tall variety NOT recommended. Fast grower – at more than 12” annually, requires extensive maturity maintenance when young. Callistemon viminalis weeping bottlebrush Has sticky flowers Magnolia grandiflora ‘St. Mary,’ southern magnolia Melaleuca quinquenervia broad-leaf paperbark Grows fast, dense, irregular form, prefers wind protection Olea europaea (any fruitless variety) fruitless olive Needs a very large basin, prefers wind protection Podocarpus gracilior/Afrocarpus falcatus fern pine Slow rooter.
[Show full text]
SF Street Tree Species List 2019
Department of Public Works 2019 Recommended Street Tree Species List 1 Introduction The San Francisco Urban Forestry Council periodically reviews and updates this list of trees in collaboration with public and non-profit urban forestry stakeholders, including San Francisco Public Works, Bureau of Urban Forestry and Friends of the Urban Forest. The 2019 Street Tree List was approved by the Urban Forestry Council on October 22, 2019. This list is intended to be used for the public realm of streets and associated spaces and plazas that are generally under the jurisdiction of the Public Works. While the focus is on the streetscape, e.g., tree wells in the public sidewalks, the list makes accommodations for these other areas in the public realm, e.g., “Street Parks.” While this list recommends species that are known to do well in many locations in San Francisco, no tree is perfect for every potential tree planting location. This list should be used as a guideline for choosing which street tree to plant but should not be used without the help of an arborist or other tree professional. All street trees must be approved by Public Works before planting. Sections 1 and 2 of the list are focused on trees appropriate for sidewalk tree wells, and Section 3 is intended as a list of trees that have limited use cases and/or are being considered as street trees. Finally, new this year, Section 4, is intended to be a list of local native tree and arborescent shrub species that would be appropriate for those sites in the public realm that have more space than the sidewalk planting wells, for example, stairways, “Street Parks,” plazas, and sidewalk gardens, where more concrete has been extracted.
[Show full text]
Listing Advice
The Minister listed this as a key threatening process, effective from 8 January 2010 Advice to the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) on Amendments to the List of Key Threatening Processes under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 1. Name and description of the threatening process 1.1 Title of the process Loss and degradation of native plant and animal habitat by invasion of escaped garden plants, including aquatic plants. 1.2 Name Changes The original title of the nomination was ‘Loss and degradation of native plant and animal habitat by invasion of escaped garden plants’. The Committee changed the name of the nomination to ‘Loss and degradation of native plant and animal habitat by invasion of escaped garden plants, including aquatic plants’ to reflect that the threatening process is not restricted to the terrestrial environment. 1.3 Description of the process The homogenisation of the global flora and fauna through the mass movement of species is creating one of the greatest environmental challenges facing the planet (Wilson, 1992). In natural ecosystems, invasive plants impact negatively on the biodiversity of many Australian vegetation types ranging from tropical wetlands to arid riverine vegetation. Leigh and Briggs (1992) identified weed competition as the primary cause for the extinction of at least four native plant species, and estimated that another 57 species were threatened or would become so in the future through competition of weeds. These figures almost certainly underestimate the contemporary problem by a large margin. The gardening industry is by far the largest importer of introduced plant species, being the source for the introduction of 25 360 or 94% of non-native plant species into Australia (Virtue et al., 2004).
[Show full text]
A Phylogeny of the Flowering Plant
American Journal of Botany 87(2): 273±292. 2000. A PHYLOGENY OF THE FLOWERING PLANT FAMILY APIACEAE BASED ON CHLOROPLAST DNA RPL16 AND RPOC1 INTRON SEQUENCES: TOWARDS A SUPRAGENERIC CLASSIFICATION OF SUBFAMILY APIOIDEAE1 STEPHEN R. DOWNIE,2,4 DEBORAH S. KATZ-DOWNIE,2 AND MARK F. W ATSON3 2Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 USA; and 3Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, Scotland, UK The higher level relationships within Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) subfamily Apioideae are controversial, with no widely acceptable modern classi®cation available. Comparative sequencing of the intron in chloroplast ribosomal protein gene rpl16 was carried out in order to examine evolutionary relationships among 119 species (99 genera) of subfamily Apioideae and 28 species from Apiaceae subfamilies Saniculoideae and Hydrocotyloideae, and putatively allied families Araliaceae and Pittosporaceae. Phylogenetic analyses of these intron sequences alone, or in conjunction with plastid rpoC1 intron sequences for a subset of the taxa, using maximum parsimony and neighbor-joining methods, reveal a pattern of relationships within Apioideae consistent with previously published chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS based phylogenies. Based on consensus of relationship, seven major lineages within the subfamily are recognized at the tribal level. These are referred to as tribes Heteromorpheae M. F. Watson & S. R. Downie Trib. Nov., Bupleureae Spreng. (1820), Oenantheae Dumort. (1827), Pleurospermeae M. F. Watson & S. R. Downie Trib. Nov., Smyrnieae Spreng. (1820), Aciphylleae M. F. Watson & S. R. Downie Trib. Nov., and Scandiceae Spreng. (1820). Scandiceae comprises subtribes Daucinae Dumort. (1827), Scan- dicinae Tausch (1834), and Torilidinae Dumort. (1827).
[Show full text]
Pittosporum Undulatum Victorian Box Pittosporaceae
Pittosporum undulatum Victorian box Pittosporaceae Forest Starr, Kim Starr, and Lloyd Loope United States Geological Survey--Biological Resources Division Haleakala Field Station, Maui, Hawai'i May, 2005 OVERVIEW Pittosporum undulatum (Victorian box), native to Australia, is widely cultivated throughout the world as an ornamental plant (Wagner et al. 1999). P. undulatum is considered invasive in several places, including Hawai'i, Jamaica, South Africa, and other Pacific and Atlantic islands (Binggeli 1998). In these areas, it spreads via bird dispersed fruit and invades moist disturbed forests from low to middle elevations. In Hawai'i, P. undulatum was introduced as early as 1875 and is now naturalized on Lana'i and Hawai'i in disturbed mesic forest, 500-1,200 m (1,640-3,937 ft) (Wagner et al. 1999). P. undulatum was not found during initial roadside surveys in 2000. It has recently been reported from a few locations on East Maui. Most locations that have been found so far are cultivated trees or hedges and a few seedlings have been observed nearby initial plantings. The distribution is currently limited and the potential range of this invasive tree on Maui could be quite large. This species is being considered for addition as a target species by the Maui Invasive Species Committee. TAXONOMY Family: Pittosporaceae (Pittosporum family) (Wagner et al. 1999). Latin name: Pittosporum undulatum Venten. (Wagner et al. 1999). Synonyms: None known. Common names: Victorian box, orange pittosporum, Victorian laurel, Pittosporum, cheesewood, Australian cheesewood, Australian mock orange (Wagner et al. 1999, PIER 2003). Taxonomic notes: Pittosporaceae is a family made up of 9 genera and about 200 species from tropical and warm termperate areas of the Old World, being best developed in Australia (Wagner et al.
[Show full text]
Pittosporum Undulatum Vent., VICTORIAN BOX, AUSTRALIAN MOCK ORANGE, SWEET PITTOSPORUM
Pittosporum undulatum Vent., VICTORIAN BOX, AUSTRALIAN MOCK ORANGE, SWEET PITTOSPORUM. Tree, evergreen, with 1−several trunks, in range to 15 m tall; ± dioecious (appearing gynodioecious); shoots pubescent with short, straight or villous hairs and puberulent glandular hairs, the nonglandular hairs commonly 2-armed (T-shaped) with unequal arms and a short stalk, becoming glabrescent (blades), somewhat aromatic when axes broken (having secretory ducts filled with resin); bark rough, dull gray, aging shallowly fissured. Stems: cylindric, to 3 mm diameter when green, with crescent-shaped leaf scars and narrowly fusiform, whitish lenticels; terminal buds (formed at end of growing season) each with ca. 15 scales, the bud scales tightly overlapping, 1/2 encircling stem, green with reddish brown tinge on exposed edges and surfaces, tomentose to villous on margins, expanding and deciduous with new growth, the outer and lowermost crescent- shaped and 1 × 3 mm, the inner and uppermost obovate and to 11 × 6 mm; new stem growth short (to 3 mm long), terminated with 3–5 congested leaves and an inflorescence. Leaves: helically alternate but not evenly spaced and often crowded at branch tip, simple, petiolate, without stipules; petiole hemi-cylindric (subcylindric at base), 9–21 mm long, puberulent with glandular hairs and ± short-villous hairs (unbranched and T-shaped), aging glabrescent; blade elliptic to oblanceolate, 45–170 × 16–55 mm, somewhat tough and leathery, broadly tapered to long-tapered and slightly oblique at base, entire and wavy on margins with a translucent strand forming edge, acute to acuminate at tip, pinnately veined with midrib raised on both surfaces, ± villous and puberulent on very young leaves becoming glabrescent, upper surface typically ± glossy dark green, lower surface dull light green.
[Show full text]