DOCSLIB.ORG

Poisonous and Injurious Plants of the United States: a Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poisonous and Injurious Plants of the United States: a Bibliography Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 5-2020 Poisonous and Injurious Plants of the United States: A Bibliography James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Poisonous and Injurious Plants of the United States: A Bibliography" (2020). Botanical Studies. 67. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/67 This Poisonous Plants is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POISONOUS & INJURIOUS PLANTS OF THE UNITED STATES: A BIBLIOGRAPHY James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 23 May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 • Introduction. 1 2 • General References . 2 3 • Symptoms & Sites . 8 4 • Poisonous Principles (Toxins). 12 5 • Food & Beverage Plants . 17 6 • Plants of Home & Garden . 19 7 • Medicinal Plants . 20 8 • Plants Poisonous to Pets & Horses . 21 9 • Purposeful Uses of Poisonous Plants Arrow and Dart Poisons. 22 Fish Poisons (Piscicides) . 23 Insecticides . 24 Rat Poisons (Raticides) . 25 Snail Poisons (Molluscides) . 25 10 • Plants by Major Group and Family Lycophytes . 26 Ferns. 26 Gymnosperms . 28 Flowering Plants . 30 11 • Plants by Region & State. 82 12 • Plants by Common & Scientific Names . 88 13 • Plants by Genus and Family . 92 [1 • I N T R O D U C T I O N] Allow me to begin on a personal note. I have a very clear recollection of the event that first sparked my interest in poisonous plants. I was a graduate student at Iowa State University, studying under the eminent agrostologist, Richard W. Pohl. He called me to his office one afternoon. He wanted to show me something interesting, which I assumed would be an unusual grass specimen. I arrived to find him using tongs to pull chunks of something out of a shallow pan. It was a gawdawful mess, and the smell was even worse. Dr. Pohl explained that I was looking at the contents of a dead sheep’s stomach that had been sent over by a colleague in the College of Veterinary Medicine. He wanted to know what the animal eaten that might have killed it. For the next half hour or so we attempted to identify the plants and we did discover a couple of culprits. Pohl was amazingly good at this. A day or so later he announced that I would be teaching the lab in his course in poisonous plants. And now, fifty-five years later, I still find myself fascinated by the subject. Along the way I developed my own class on poisonous plants at Humboldt State, and on a few occasions I found myself offering advice in hospital emergency rooms and the county coroner’s office. This compilation is limited to ferns, gymnosperms, and flowering plants, the vast majority of them being either native or naturalized species. I have included a few of the better known ornamentals found in homes and gardens, medicines and herbal remedies, and psychoactive plants that are used/abused recreationally. Geographically the coverage is the conterminous or contiguous 48 states, the District of Columbia, Alaska, and Hawai’i. I have included injurious plants — those with thorns, spines, prickles, and hairs that do not produce a toxin, but that can cause mild to serious irritation and may become sites of infection. The victims of poisoning are humans, wild and domesticated animals, household pets, and even other plants. The May 2020 date is misleading. I began compiling this bibliography many years ago in connection with my course in poisonous plants. The vast majority of the references listed below are from the 2005 edition. I have, however, added many more recent books and papers. -1- , [2 • G E N E R A L R E F E R E N C E S] Acamovic, T., C. S. Stewart, & T. Pennycott (editors). 2003. Poisonous plants and related toxins. CABI. Wallingford, UK. 608 pp. Adams, S. E. 1978. Toxicity of indigenous plants and agricultural chemicals in farm animals. Clin. Toxicol. 13(2): 269-280. Allen, M. & M. Peissel. 1993. Dangerous plants and mushrooms. Chelsea House. New York, NY. 119 pp. Altman, H. 1980. Poisonous plants and animals. Chatto & Windus. London, UK. Arena, J. M. 1978. Poisonous plants. Clin. Med. 85: 13-25. Arena, J. M. 1979. Pretty poisonous plants. Vet. Human Toxicol. 21(2): 108-111. Arena, J. M. 1981. Plants that poison. Emergency Med. 13(11): 24-57. Arena, J. M. & R. H. Drew. 1986. Poisoning: toxicology, symptoms, treatments. Fifth edition. C. C. Thomas. Springfield, IL. 1128 pp. (Poisonous plants, pp. 703-735) Arnold, R. E. & L. Pearce. 1977. Burgeoning cult of wild food nourishes fatal misconceptions. Smithsonian 8(2): 48-55. Arnold, R. E. 1978. Poisonous plants. Terra Publ. Co. Jeffersontown, KY. 141 pp. Aronow, R. 1979. Toxic reactions to plant products sold in health food stores. Vet. Human Toxicol. 21(3): 193, 194. Bailey, E. M., Jr. 1978. Physiologic responses of livestock to toxic plants. J. Range Management 31(5): 343-347. Bailey, M. E. 1979. Major poisonous plant problems in cattle. Bov. Pract. 14: 169-175. Bernard-Smith, A. 1923. Poisonous plants of all countries. Second edition. Soni Reprints Agency. Delhi, India. 112 pp. Bevan-Jones, R. 2009. Poisonous plants: a cultural and social history. Windgather Press. Oxford, UK. 220 pp. Bhattacharjee, S. K. & S. Bhattacharjee. 2013. Poisonous plants: their botany, properties and uses. Aavishkar Publ. Jaipur, India. Two vols. 659 pp. Binns, W. 1974. Range and pasture plants poisonous to sheep. J. American Vet. Med. Assoc. 164: 284, 285. Blackwell, W. H. 1990. Poisonous and medicinal plants. Prentice Hall. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ. 329 pp. Brinker, F. J. 1983. An introduction to the toxicology of common botanical medicinal substances. National College of Naturopathic Medicine. Portland, OR. 127 pp. Brower, L. P. et al. 1967. Plant poisons in a terrestrial food chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 57: 893-898. Brown, M. 2018. Death in the garden: poisonous plants & their use throughout history. White Owl Books. 248 pp. Brunton, J. 1999. Toxic plants dangerous to humans and animals. Intercept Ltd. Andover, UK. 545 pp. Burrows, G. E. & R. J. Tyrl. 1989. Plants causing sudden death in livestock. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 5:(2): 263-289. Burrows, G. E. & R. J. Tyrl. 2013. Toxic plants of North America. Second edition. Wiley-Blackwell. 1383 pp. Campbell, A. 1998. Poisoning in small animals from commonly ingested plants. In Practice 20: 587-591. Chestnut, V. K. 1898. Principal poisonous plants of the United States. Bot. Bull. No. 20. U. S. Dept. Agric. Washington, D. C. 60 pp. Cilliers, L. & F. P. Retief. 2000. Poisons, poisoning and the drug trade in ancient Rome. Akroterion 45: 88-100. Cooper, M. R. & A. W. Johnson. 1984. Poisonous plants in Britain and their effects on animals and man. Reference Book 161. Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. London, UK. 305 pp. Cooper, M. R. & A. W. Johnson. 1988. Poisonous plants & fungi. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. London, U. K. 134 pp. Cornell University. Department of Animal Science. Plants poisonous to livestock and other animals. http://poisonousplants.ansci.cornell.edu/index.html Crane, T. D. 1973. Plant poisoning in animals: a bibliography. Vet. Bull. 43: 165-177; 231-249. -2- Creekmore, H. 1966. Daffodils are dangerous. The poisonous plants in your garden. Walker. New York, NY. 258 pp. Cronin, E. H. et al. 1978. The ecological niches of poisonous plants in range communities. J. Range Management 31: 328-334. Culvenor, C. C. J. 1970. Toxic plants -- a reevaluation. Search 1:103-110. Dauncey, E. A. 2010. Poisonous plants: a guide for parents and childcare providers. Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew, UK. 180 pp. Dauncey, E. A. & S. Larsson. 2018. Plants that kill: a natural history of the world’s most poisonous plants. Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton, NJ. 224 pp. Davis, L. H. & L. F. James. 1972. Impact of poisonous plants on rangeland appraisal and management. J. American Soc. Farm Mgrs. & Rural Appr. 36: 49-54. Davis, T. Z, S. T. Lee, M. H. Ralphs, & K. E. Panter. 2009. Selected common poisonous plants of the United States’ rangelands. Rangelands 31(1): 38-44. De Wolf, G. P., Jr. 1974. Guide to potentially dangerous plants. Arnoldia 34(2): 45-91. Diaz, J. H. 2016. Poisoning by herbs and plants: rapid toxidromic classification and diagnosis. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 27(1): 136-152. DiTomaso, J. M. 1985. Poisonous plants: their impact on livestock and man. 37th Annual California Weed Conf. Pp. 29-37. DiTomaso, J. M. 1993. Problems associated with the use of common names in the identification of poisonous plants. Vet. Human Toxicol. 35(5): 465, 466. DiTomaso, J. M. 1994. Plants reported to be poisonous to animals in the United States. Vet. Human Toxicol. 36(1): 49-52. D'Mello, J. P. F., C. M. Duffus, & J. H. Duffus. 1991. Toxic substances in crop plants. Royal Soc. Chemistry. Cambridge, England. 339 pp. D’Mello, J. P. F. 1997. Handbook of plant and fungal toxicants. CRC Prss. Boca Raton, FL. 356 pp. Dowden, A. O. 1994. Poisons in our path: plants that harm and heal. Harper Collins Publ. New York, NY. 61 pp. Ellenhorn, M. J. et al. Plants - mycotoxins - mushrooms. In, Ellenhorn’s medical toxicology: diagnosis and treatment of human poisoning.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Remote Sensing and Airborne Geophysics in the Assessment of Natural Aggregate Resources
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY REMOTE SENSING AND AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICS IN THE ASSESSMENT OF NATURAL AGGREGATE RESOURCES by D.H. Knepper, Jr.1, W.H. Langer1, and S.H. Miller1 OPEN-FILE REPORT 94-158 1994 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS ABSTRACT........................................................................................... iv CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................. I-1 II. TYPES OF AGGREGATE DEPOSITS........................................... II-1 Crushed Stone............................................................................... II-1 Sedimentary Rocks............................................................. II-3 Igneous Rocks.................................................................... II-3 Metamorphic Rocks........................................................... II-4 Sand and Gravel............................................................................ II-4 Glacial Deposits................................................................ II-5 Alluvial Fans.................................................................... II-5 Stream Channel and Terrace Deposits............................... II-6 Marine Deposits...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Index Vol. 12-15
    353 INDEX VOL. 12-15 Die Stichworte des Sachregisters sind in der jeweiligen Sprache der einzelnen Beitrage aufgefiihrt. Les termes repris dans la Table des matieres sont donnes selon la langue dans laquelle l'ouvrage est ecrit. The references of the Subject Index are given in the language of the respective contribution. 14 AAG (Alpha-acid glycoprotein) 120 14 Adenosine 108 12 Abortion 151 12 Adenosine-phosphate 311 13 Abscisin 12, 46, 66 13 Adenosine-5'-phosphosulfate 148 14 Absorbierbarkeit 317 13 Adenosine triphosphate 358 14 Absorption 309, 350 15 S-Adenosylmethionine 261 13 Absorption of drugs 139 13 Adipaenin (Spasmolytin) 318 14 - 15 12 Adrenal atrophy 96 14 Absorptionsgeschwindigkeit 300, 306 14 - 163, 164 14 Absorptionsquote 324 13 Adrenal gland 362 14 ACAI (Anticorticocatabolic activity in­ 12 Adrenalin(e) 319 dex) 145 14 - 209, 210 12 Acalo 197 15 - 161 13 Aceclidine (3-Acetoxyquinuclidine) 307, 13 {i-Adrenergic blockers 119 308, 310, 311, 330, 332 13 Adrenergic-blocking activity 56 13 Acedapsone 193,195,197 14 O(-Adrenergic blocking drugs 36, 37, 43 13 Aceperone (Acetabutone) 121 14 {i-Adrenergic blocking drugs 38 12 Acepromazin (Plegizil) 200 14 Adrenergic drugs 90 15 Acetanilid 156 12 Adrenocorticosteroids 14, 30 15 Acetazolamide 219 12 Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) 13 Acetoacetyl-coenzyme A 258 16,30,155 12 Acetohexamide 16 14 - 149,153,163,165,167,171 15 1-Acetoxy-8-aminooctahydroindolizin 15 Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) 216 (Slaframin) 168 14 Adrenosterone 153 13 4-Acetoxy-1-azabicyclo(3, 2, 2)-nonane 12 Adreson 252
    [Show full text]
  • Cally Plant List a ACIPHYLLA Horrida
    Cally Plant List A ACIPHYLLA horrida ACONITUM albo-violaceum albiflorum ABELIOPHYLLUM distichum ACONITUM cultivar ABUTILON vitifolium ‘Album’ ACONITUM pubiceps ‘Blue Form’ ACAENA magellanica ACONITUM pubiceps ‘White Form’ ACAENA species ACONITUM ‘Spark’s Variety’ ACAENA microphylla ‘Kupferteppich’ ACONITUM cammarum ‘Bicolor’ ACANTHUS mollis Latifolius ACONITUM cammarum ‘Franz Marc’ ACANTHUS spinosus Spinosissimus ACONITUM lycoctonum vulparia ACANTHUS ‘Summer Beauty’ ACONITUM variegatum ACANTHUS dioscoridis perringii ACONITUM alboviolaceum ACANTHUS dioscoridis ACONITUM lycoctonum neapolitanum ACANTHUS spinosus ACONITUM paniculatum ACANTHUS hungaricus ACONITUM species ex. China (Ron 291) ACANTHUS mollis ‘Long Spike’ ACONITUM japonicum ACANTHUS mollis free-flowering ACONITUM species Ex. Japan ACANTHUS mollis ‘Turkish Form’ ACONITUM episcopale ACANTHUS mollis ‘Hollard’s Gold’ ACONITUM ex. Russia ACANTHUS syriacus ACONITUM carmichaelii ‘Spätlese’ ACER japonicum ‘Aconitifolium’ ACONITUM yezoense ACER palmatum ‘Filigree’ ACONITUM carmichaelii ‘Barker’s Variety’ ACHILLEA grandifolia ACONITUM ‘Newry Blue’ ACHILLEA ptarmica ‘Perry’s White’ ACONITUM napellus ‘Bergfürst’ ACHILLEA clypeolata ACONITUM unciniatum ACIPHYLLA monroi ACONITUM napellus ‘Blue Valley’ ACIPHYLLA squarrosa ACONITUM lycoctonum ‘Russian Yellow’ ACIPHYLLA subflabellata ACONITUM japonicum subcuneatum ACONITUM meta-japonicum ADENOPHORA aurita ACONITUM napellus ‘Carneum’ ADIANTUM aleuticum ‘Japonicum’ ACONITUM arcuatum B&SWJ 774 ADIANTUM aleuticum ‘Miss Sharples’ ACORUS calamus ‘Argenteostriatus’
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: a Lakota Story Cycle Paul A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Paul Johnsgard Collection Papers in the Biological Sciences 2008 Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle" (2008). Paul Johnsgard Collection. 51. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard/51 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Paul Johnsgard Collection by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Fiction I Historical History I Native Ameri("an Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle is a narrative history of the Pine Ridge Lakota tribe of South Dakota, following its history from 1850 to the present day through actual historical events and through the stories of four fictional Lakota children, each related by descent and separated from one another by two generations. The ecology of the Pine Ridge region, especially its mammalian and avian wildlife, is woven into the stories of the children. 111ustrated by the author, the book includes drawings of Pine Ridge wildlife, regional maps, and Native American pictorial art. Appendices include a listing of important Lakota words, and checklists of mammals and breeding birds of the region. Dr. Paul A. Johnsgard is foundation professor of biological sciences emeritus of the University of Nebraska-lincoln.
    [Show full text]
  • Paperbark Park Bramston Beach
    PAPERBARK PARK BRAMSTON BEACH Paperbark Park Bramston Beach This list contains plants observed during a visit 1st November 2020 by a combined outing of the Tablelands, Innisfail and the Cairns Branches of the Society for Growing Australian Plants, Queensland Region to Bramston Beach. Names used for family, genera and species are generally in accordance with the Census of the Queensland Flora 2020 by the Queensland Herbarium, Brisbane. * Introduced naturalised exotic species not native to Australia C3 Class 3 weed FERNS & ALLIES Aspleniaceae Asplenium nidus Birds Nest Fern Nephrolepidaceae Nephrolepis obliterata Polypodiaceae Drynaria rigidula Basket Fern Platycerium hillii Northern Elkhorn Fern Pyrrosia longifolia GYMNOSPERMS Podocarpaceae Podocarpus grayae Weeping Brown Pine FLOWERING PLANTS-BASAL GROUP Annonaceae *C3 Annona glabra Pond Apple Polyalthia nitidissima Canary Beech Lauraceae Beilschmiedia obtusifolia Blush Walnut; Hard Cassytha filiformis Dodder Laurel Cryptocarya hypospodia Northern Laurel Litsea fawcettiana Bollywood Monimiaceae Wilkiea pubescens Tetra Beech FLOWERING PLANTS-MONOCOTYLEDONS Arecaceae * Cocos nucifera Coconut Commelinaceae Commelina ensifolia Sailor's Purse; Scurvy Cyperaceae Cyperus pedunculatus Pineapple Sedge Fuirena umbellata Rhynchospora corymbosa Golden Beak Rush Scleria sphacelata R.L. Jago Last update 23 June 2021 Page 1 PAPERBARK PARK BRAMSTON BEACH Flagellariaceae Flagellaria indica Supplejack Heliconiaceae * Heliconia psittacorum Heliconia Hemerocallidaceae Dianella caerulea var. vannata Blue
    [Show full text]
  • Euphorbia Subg
    ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ БЮДЖЕТНОЕ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЕ НАУКИ БОТАНИЧЕСКИЙ ИНСТИТУТ ИМ. В.Л. КОМАРОВА РОССИЙСКОЙ АКАДЕМИИ НАУК На правах рукописи Гельтман Дмитрий Викторович ПОДРОД ESULA РОДА EUPHORBIA (EUPHORBIACEAE): СИСТЕМА, ФИЛОГЕНИЯ, ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ 03.02.01 — ботаника ДИССЕРТАЦИЯ на соискание ученой степени доктора биологических наук САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГ 2015 2 Оглавление Введение ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Глава 1. Род Euphorbia и основные проблемы его систематики ......................................... 9 1.1. Общая характеристика и систематическое положение .......................................... 9 1.2. Краткая история таксономического изучения и формирования системы рода ... 10 1.3. Основные проблемы систематики рода Euphorbia и его подрода Esula на рубеже XX–XXI вв. и пути их решения ..................................................................................... 15 Глава 2. Материал и методы исследования ........................................................................... 17 Глава 3. Построение системы подрода Esula рода Euphorbia на основе молекулярно- филогенетического подхода ...................................................................................................... 24 3.1. Краткая история молекулярно-филогенетического изучения рода Euphorbia и его подрода Esula ......................................................................................................... 24 3.2. Результаты молекулярно-филогенетического
    [Show full text]
  • Rosary Pea Abrus Precatorius (L.) Fabaceae
    InvasiveInvasive SpeciesSpecies ManagementManagement PlansPlans forfor FloridaFlorida Rosary Pea Abrus precatorius (L.) Fabaceae INTRODUCTION Rosary pea has been widely used in Florida as an ornamental plant for many years. The native range of rosary pea is India and parts of Asia, where this plant is used for various purposes. The roots of this plant are used to induce abortion and relieve abdominal discomfort. The seeds of this plant are so uniform in size and weight that they are used as standards in weight measurement. The seeds can also be used to make jewelry. Interestingly, one of the most deadly plant toxins, abrin, is produced by rosary pea (Abrus precatorius). Studies have shown that as little as 0.00015% of toxin per body weight will cause fatality in humans (a single seed). Interestingly, birds appear to be unaffected by the deadly toxin as they have been shown to readily disperse rosary pea seed. DESCRIPTION Rosary pea is a small, high climbing vine with alternately compound leaves, 2-5 inches long, with 5 to 15 pairs of oblong leaflets. A key characteristic in identifying rosary pea is the lack of a terminal leaflet on the compound leaves. The flowers are small, pale, and violet to pink, clustered in leaf axils. The fruit is characteristic of a legume. The pod is oblong, flat and truncate shaped, roughly 1½ - 2 inches long. This seedpod curls back when it opens, revealing the seeds. The seeds are small, brilliant red with a black spot. These characteristics give the plant another common name of crab’s eyes. IMPACTS Rosary pea is found throughout central and southern Florida, including Marion, Lake, Palm Beach, and Manatee counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicinal Practices of Sacred Natural Sites: a Socio-Religious Approach for Successful Implementation of Primary
    Medicinal practices of sacred natural sites: a socio-religious approach for successful implementation of primary healthcare services Rajasri Ray and Avik Ray Review Correspondence Abstract Rajasri Ray*, Avik Ray Centre for studies in Ethnobiology, Biodiversity and Background: Sacred groves are model systems that Sustainability (CEiBa), Malda - 732103, West have the potential to contribute to rural healthcare Bengal, India owing to their medicinal floral diversity and strong social acceptance. *Corresponding Author: Rajasri Ray; [email protected] Methods: We examined this idea employing ethnomedicinal plants and their application Ethnobotany Research & Applications documented from sacred groves across India. A total 20:34 (2020) of 65 published documents were shortlisted for the Key words: AYUSH; Ethnomedicine; Medicinal plant; preparation of database and statistical analysis. Sacred grove; Spatial fidelity; Tropical diseases Standard ethnobotanical indices and mapping were used to capture the current trend. Background Results: A total of 1247 species from 152 families Human-nature interaction has been long entwined in has been documented for use against eighteen the history of humanity. Apart from deriving natural categories of diseases common in tropical and sub- resources, humans have a deep rooted tradition of tropical landscapes. Though the reported species venerating nature which is extensively observed are clustered around a few widely distributed across continents (Verschuuren 2010). The tradition families, 71% of them are uniquely represented from has attracted attention of researchers and policy- any single biogeographic region. The use of multiple makers for its impact on local ecological and socio- species in treating an ailment, high use value of the economic dynamics. Ethnomedicine that emanated popular plants, and cross-community similarity in from this tradition, deals health issues with nature- disease treatment reflects rich community wisdom to derived resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating the Uncultured: Growing the Recalcitrant Cluster-2 Frankia Strains
    Gtari M, Ghodhabane-Gtari F, Nouioui I, Gtari A, Hezbri K, Mimouni W, Sbissi I, Ayari A, Yamanaka T, Normand P, Tisa L, Boudabous A. Cultivating the uncultured: growing the recalcitrant cluster-2 Frankia strains. Scientific Reports 2015, 5, 13112. Copyright: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. DOI link to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13112 Date deposited: 01/07/2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Cultivating the uncultured: growing the recalcitrant cluster-2 Frankia strains Received: 25 February 2015 1 1 1 1 1 Accepted: 15 July 2015 Maher Gtari , Faten Ghodhbane-Gtari , Imen Nouioui , Amir Ktari , Karima Hezbri , 1 1 1 2 3 Published: 19 August 2015 Wajdi Mimouni , Imed Sbissi , Amani Ayari , Takashi Yamanaka , Philippe Normand , Louis S Tisa4 & Abdellatif Boudabous1 The repeated failures reported in cultivating some microbial lineages are a major challenge in microbial ecology and probably linked, in the case of Frankia microsymbionts to atypical patterns of auxotrophy. Comparative genomics of the so far uncultured cluster-2 Candidatus Frankia datiscae Dg1, with cultivated Frankiae has revealed genome reduction, but no obvious physiological impairments. A direct physiological assay on nodule tissues from Coriaria myrtifolia infected with a closely-related strain permitted the identification of a requirement for alkaline conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Attempted Suicide by Cerbera Odollam Seed Ingestion
    Hindawi Case Reports in Critical Care Volume 2020, Article ID 7367191, 5 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7367191 Case Report A Case of Attempted Suicide by Cerbera odollam Seed Ingestion Michelle Bernshteyn , Steven H. Adams, and Kunal Gada SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St., Syracuse, NY 13210, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Michelle Bernshteyn; [email protected] Received 3 March 2020; Revised 2 June 2020; Accepted 4 June 2020; Published 15 June 2020 Academic Editor: Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira Copyright © 2020 Michelle Bernshteyn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We report a case of attempted suicide by Cerbera odollam seed ingestion by a transgender patient who was successfully treated at our hospital. While the C. odollam plant has multiple practical and ornamental functions, its seeds have traditionally been utilized for suicidal and homicidal purposes in many parts of the world. Physicians should be aware of the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of C. odollam ingestion given the current ease of availability of these seeds in the United States and the increased reports of suicide attempts. 1. Introduction with a junctional rhythm and therefore received a total of 10 vials of Digibind (digoxin immune fab). She denied any head- Indigenous to India and Southeast Asia, Cerbera odollam, ache, visual disturbances, chest pain, palpitations, shortness “ ” also known as pong-pong, or suicide tree, yields highly car- of breath, abdominal tenderness, diarrhea, or constipation.
    [Show full text]