DOCSLIB.ORG

ELECTION 2018 to LEARN MORE, PLEASE VISIT US AT: Westernpriorities.Org Westernpriorities.Org to LEARNMORE,PLEASEVISIT US AT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Center for Western Priorities January 2019 WINNING THE WEST ELECTION 2018 TO LEARN MORE, PLEASE VISIT US AT: westernpriorities.org ELECTION 2018 — FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 2. MONTANA: PUBLIC LANDS REMAIN A PREREQUISITE FOR SUCCESS 3. TESTER VS. ROSENDALE — Public lands take center stage 4. WILLIAMS VS. GIANFORTE — Bipartisan unity against selling public lands 5. NEW MEXICO: PUBLIC LANDS WIN IN A LANDSLIDE 6. LUJAN GRISHAM VS. PEARCE — A Governor who champions New Mexico’s lands 7. HEINRICH VS. RICH VS. JOHNSON — A record of conservation success 8. TORRES SMALL VS. HERRELL — A new voice for New Mexico’s lands 9. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS — Holding industry accountable 10. COLORADO: EXPANDING A CONSERVATION LEGACY 11. POLIS VS. STAPLETON — Keeping Colorado wild 12. CROW VS. COFFMAN — Conservation in a suburban district 13. MITSCH BUSH VS. TIPTON — Public lands narrow the gap 14. COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL — Standing up for our land 15. ARIZONA: CONSERVATION IN A CHANGING STATE 16. SINEMA VS. McSALLY — Close election, big win for public lands 17. O’HALLERAN VS. ROGERS — Conserving Arizona’s canyons 18. NEVADA: PUBLIC LANDS FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS 19. SISOLAK VS. LAXALT — A vision for Nevada’s energy future 20. ROSEN VS. HELLER — Fighting to preserve Nevada’s outdoors 21. LEE VS. TARKANIAN — Battle for Nevada’s lands 22. HORSFORD VS. HARDY — Monumental rematch 23. UTAH: AN UNEXPECTED WIN FOR PUBLIC LANDS 24. McADAMS VS. LOVE — A balanced approach 25. SAN JUAN COUNTY COMMISSIONER — Historic victory 26. IDAHO: PUBLIC LANDS EXTREMISM REJECTED 27. LITTLE VS. JORDAN — Idaho rejects extreme views on public lands 28. TABLE OF CONTENTS WYOMING: A BALANCE BETWEEN ENERGY AND CONSERVATION 29. GORDON VS. THRONE — A balanced public lands platform 30. POLLING INSIGHTS 31. The growing outdoor voting bloc 32. TO LEARN MORE, PLEASE VISIT US AT: Meet the outdoor voters 33. How Western voters talk about their public lands 34. The online conversation 35. westernpriorities.org ELECTION 2020 — A LOOK AHEAD 36. REFERENCES 37. ELECTION 2018 FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR What does it mean to “Win the Polls, focus groups, and a social media analysis West?” In the 2018 midterm showed how the growing influence of the election, it meant respecting and outdoor voting bloc played an outsized role protecting public lands. Winning in moving Western voters. Voters in Mountain candidates in close Mountain West swing states like Arizona, Colorado, West elections prioritized these Montana, Nevada, and New Mexico told us they issues in order to connect with supported a balanced approach to managing voters. Advertising, social media, conservation, recreation, and responsible and campaign imagery related energy development. They wanted candidates to outdoor issues—highlighted who care about conservation and are willing to in our 2016 report as noteworthy take positions that respect the Western way of patterns—are now unignorable life. And they overwhelmingly rejected efforts trends. While other issues like to drill and mine recklessly on public lands or health care and immigration topped headlines, shrink popular national monuments. winning candidates in the Mountain West made concerted efforts to highlight their pro-public Those views turned into votes last November. lands positions and values. Of the 22 races we tracked throughout this election, 20 featured significant pro-public Pro-public lands candidates won in the West; lands advertising or public lands messaging. firm respect for the outdoors is a key voting Candidates leveraged public lands to gain issue for Westerners. support while using the mountains and outdoor spaces of the Mountain West to serve as the Public lands—how they are used, their backdrop of numerous campaign ads and pro- importance to local economies, and the way public lands messages on social media. they define life in the West—were often featured as a distinguishing issue by winning campaigns. This report is the culmination of our analysis in In most competitive states and districts across the 2018 election cycle. We hope you will learn the region, candidates had to be pro-public more and join us online at westernpriorities. lands to win. Many candidates leveraged public org/winningthewest to continue the lands to connect with Western voters not only conversation moving forward. throughout their campaign, but also in the week leading up to Election Day. The Center for Western Priorities’ Winning the West campaign examined the views of voters on public lands and how the issue was highlighted Jennifer Rokala in closely-watched elections in Arizona, Executive Director, Colorado, Montana, Nevada, and New Mexico. Center for Western Priorities 2 MONTANA: Public lands MONTANA VOTERS remain a AT A GLANCE 36% 57% prerequisite approval rating oppose increasing for then- oil and gas U.S. Interior development on for success Secretary public lands. Ryan Zinke. In Montana, there’s an expectation that successful candidates running for public office show strong oppose increasing support for public lands and access to the outdoors 66% public land available for hunting, angling, and outdoor recreation. for oil and gas development by Seventy-one percent of voters say they oppose reducing conservation efforts on behalf opening public lands close to national parks and of potentially endangered wildlife. monuments for oil and gas drilling. Public lands— and access to them—has become a third rail in Montana. In 2018, outdoor issues played a significant think outdoor recreation role in two races. 91% will be important to the future of their state’s economy. 3 Tester vs. Rosendale: PUBLIC LANDS TAKE CENTER STAGE PUBLIC LANDS IN PUBLIC HANDS “Look, Montanans know who I am: They Senator Jon Tester, a Democrat, ran for know I’m a lifetime Montanan, they re-election on a pro-public lands platform, know I understand rural America, they prominently featuring the issue in his know I understand public lands and not closing argument to voters in a nationally privatizing them, they know I understand watched race that was expected to be close. the importance of public education. Matt Rosendale isn’t any of that.”1 Initially, Tester was seen as one of the nation’s most vulnerable Senate A “RANCHER” AT HEART My family's been farming out here for three generations. Tester used his support for public lands incumbents. President Donald Trump won “Montana is a special place. the state by 21 points in 2016 and U.S. and outdoor access to buttress against I've defended our public lands Representative Greg Gianforte comfortably frequent attacks from President Trump, every day that I've been in the won the state’s at-large congressional seat who visited the state four times over the Senate, while my opponent in a recent special election. fall and held multiple rallies in support supported transferring our federal public lands. Now he of Rosendale in the closing days before says he's seen the light. But 2 Public lands took center stage this election the election. Tester’s campaign spent just last year he voted against as Tester ran multiple television ads and a reported $790,000 on internet and access to tens of thousands promoted social media content promising television advertising, many targeting of acres. Montanans have to fight and keep “public lands in public voters with a pro-public lands message.3 long fought off out of state developers. I'm Jon Tester hands.” Tester ended ads and speeches and I approve this message to with the frequent refrain: “as long as I’m in The race caught the attention of national defend Montana once again. the U.S. Senate, Montana is not for sale.” media and brands like Patagonia. Its endorsement of Tester marked the first — JON TESTER CAMPAIGN AD, Tester used his position and record on political endorsement in the company’s “Defending Our Public Lands” public lands as a way to connect with history.4 local voters and, by contrast, portray his opponent, developer Matt Rosendale, Tester’s strategy of connecting with as an outsider without a grasp on what voters through the shared value of it means to be a Montanan. Tester respecting Montana’s public lands was confidently discussed his campaign and a success. He won a majority of the vote how Montanans viewed him in an interview and outpaced his opponent by three with The Associated Press, stating: percentage points.5 Election day tweet from Sen. Jon Tester Don’t let rain or snow slow you down. Montanans are counting on you to vote today by 8pm. Our public lands, health care, and Montana Jon Tester way of life depend on it. @jontester 7:21 AM - 6 Nov 2018 4 Williams vs. Gianforte: BIPARTISAN UNITY AGAINST SELLING PUBLIC LANDS Greg Gianforte @GregForMontana The race for Montana’s at-large seat in hard stance against the sale or transfer of Montana’s public lands the U.S. House of Representatives pitted public lands, putting him at odds with the are always worth fighting for, which is why I incumbent Congressman Greg Gianforte, Republican Party’s national platform on “championed legislation to 7 a Republican, against Democrat Kathleen the issue. protect East Rosebud Creek. Williams. Gianforte won the seat in a 2017 Montana is our home. I’m special election to replace former Interior Gianforte spent nearly $4.2 million on proud to defend it. Secretary Ryan Zinke. his statewide campaign, running more 11:28AM - 18 Sep 2018 television ads than any other candidate Gianforte previously ran for governor in running in a statewide election across 2016, losing to Democrat Steve Bullock. the country.8 Those ads,
Recommended publications
  • SEC Approves Regulation Best Interest, Form

    SEC Approves Regulation Best Interest, Form

    In classic Greek mythology, a golden apple of discord inscribed "For the fairest" was awarded to Aphrodite, beginning a chain of events that led to the Trojan War. GrayRobinson's newsletter reports on the most recent issues, individuals, and discourse deemed fairest in Washington. June 7, 2019 If I don’t do it, somebody else will . we’re tipping a glass today to the memory of Mac Rebennack, better known as Dr. John the Nite Tripper, who passed away yesterday at the age of 77. A legendary performer and global ambassador for his hometown of New Orleans, he won six Grammy Awards and was inducted into the Hall of Fame—but how many people have Muppets created in their image? At least Dr. Teeth and the Electric Mayhem play on. SEC approves Regulation Best Interest, Form CRS At a long-anticipated meeting on Wednesday, the Securities and Exchange Commission voted 3-1 to approve a package of rules and guidance establishing the obligations of investment advisers and brokers to their customers. Regulation Best Interest (BI) goes beyond previous “suitability” standards for investment brokers to ban certain practices and address elements of the broker-customer relationship including cost considerations and conflicts in broker compensation. Form CRS is a streamlined disclosure document to provide retail customers with information about fees, costs, services, conflicts of interest, the applicable standards of conduct, and any previous legal or disciplinary history. The Commission also approved an interpretation that updates and clarifies the standards of conduct for investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and an interpretation of the “solely incidental” aspect of the broker-dealer exclusion under the Investment Advisers Act, intended to offer clearer guidance about when a broker- dealer’s activities cross the threshold to become investment advice.
  • List of City Council Adopted Resolutions Banning City-Sponsored

    List of City Council Adopted Resolutions Banning City-Sponsored

    List of City Council adopted resolutions banning City-sponsored travel to certain 2021 states due to those states’ laws and policies that are counter to West Hollywood’s progressive values and policies The City Council of the City of West Hollywood has, over the years, adopted several resolutions banning City-sponsored travel of City staff and elected officials to certain states that adopt policies considered to run counter to the City’s core values and detrimental to different constituencies. The following is a list of such states for which City-sponsored travel is restricted or contingent upon certain circumstances: State(s) Title of the Resolution Resolution No. Adopted On Status North Carolina “A resolution of the City Council of the City of West 17-4992 September 18, 2017 Current Mississippi Hollywood amending resolution no. 16-4810 to establish exceptions for travel to a state that is included in the list of restricted destinations”. The exception to the travel restriction is created so as to permit elected officials and staff to advocate, educate, and lobby for LGBT equality or any of the City of West Hollywood’s core values. Alabama “A resolution of the City Council of the City of West 19-5180 May 20, 2019 Current* (See page 2 Arkansas Hollywood denouncing Georgia’s Living Infants’ Fairness for Update on Strict Georgia and Equality (life) Act (HB 481) and Alabama’s Human Abortion Bans) Kentucky Life Protection Act (HB 314)”. The resolution also calls on Louisiana restricting City-sponsored travel to states that adopt Mississippi similar laws. Missouri Ohio Utah Texas Texas’ SB 8 Texas Heartbeat Act of 2021.
  • Understanding the 2016 Gubernatorial Elections by Jennifer M

    Understanding the 2016 Gubernatorial Elections by Jennifer M

    GOVERNORS The National Mood and the Seats in Play: Understanding the 2016 Gubernatorial Elections By Jennifer M. Jensen and Thad Beyle With a national anti-establishment mood and 12 gubernatorial elections—eight in states with a Democrat as sitting governor—the Republicans were optimistic that they would strengthen their hand as they headed into the November elections. Republicans already held 31 governor- ships to the Democrats’ 18—Alaska Gov. Bill Walker is an Independent—and with about half the gubernatorial elections considered competitive, Republicans had the potential to increase their control to 36 governors’ mansions. For their part, Democrats had a realistic chance to convert only a couple of Republican governorships to their party. Given the party’s win-loss potential, Republicans were optimistic, in a good position. The Safe Races North Dakota Races in Delaware, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah Republican incumbent Jack Dalrymple announced and Washington were widely considered safe for he would not run for another term as governor, the incumbent party. opening the seat up for a competitive Republican primary. North Dakota Attorney General Wayne Delaware Stenehjem received his party’s endorsement at Popular Democratic incumbent Jack Markell was the Republican Party convention, but multimil- term-limited after fulfilling his second term in office. lionaire Doug Burgum challenged Stenehjem in Former Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, the primary despite losing the party endorsement. eldest son of former Vice President Joe Biden, was Lifelong North Dakota resident Burgum had once considered a shoo-in to succeed Markell before founded a software company, Great Plains Soft- a 2014 recurrence of brain cancer led him to stay ware, that was eventually purchased by Microsoft out of the race.
  • The Republican Party and the Chamber of Secrets How the U.S

    The Republican Party and the Chamber of Secrets How the U.S

    December 7, 2016 www.citizen.org The Republican Party and the Chamber of Secrets How the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Waved Its Dark Money Wand on the 2016 Elections and Elected a Slew of GOP Politicians Beholden to Big Business Acknowledgments This report was written by Grace Aylmer, Campaign Coordinator for Public Citizen’s U.S. Chamber Watch division and edited by U.S. Chamber Watch Director Dan Dudis and Congress Watch Director Lisa Gilbert. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a national non-profit organization with more than 400,000 members and supporters. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, administrative advocacy, research, and public education on a broad range of issues including consumer rights in the marketplace, product safety, financial regulation, worker safety, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform and government ethics, fair trade, climate change, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E Washington, D.C. 20003 P: 202-546-4996 F: 202-547-7392 http://www.citizen.org © 2016 Public Citizen Public Citizen The Republican Party and the Chamber of Secrets Introduction The U.S. Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) was the second largest overall non-disclosing (or “dark money”) outside spender in 2016 federal races after the National Rifle Association, and was the largest non-disclosing outside spender on 2016 congressional races. Additionally, the Chamber was the largest non-disclosing outside spender in 75 percent of the races in which it spent money. The Chamber involved itself most heavily in races for the U.S. Senate, spending a total of $25.8 million in 10 Senate races.
  • 2020 Political/Elections Overview

    2020 Political/Elections Overview

    2020 Political/Elections Overview Table of Contents Presidential Election Results ................................................................................................... 2 Candidate Biographies ........................................................................................................... 2 2020 Democratic Platform ...................................................................................................... 3 Where Biden Stands on the Health Issues ............................................................................... 6 Senate Balance of Power ........................................................................................................ 8 House Balance of Power ......................................................................................................... 9 Health Professionals Serving in the 117th Congress ............................................................... 11 Congressional Leadership ...................................................................................................... 12 Congressional Schedule ......................................................................................................... 12 House Health Committee Membership .................................................................................. 13 Senate Health Committee Membership ................................................................................. 15 Caucus Leadership and Membership .....................................................................................
  • PRIME-ARY PERSPECTIVE: MAINE, NEVADA, NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, and VIRGINIA

    PRIME-ARY PERSPECTIVE: MAINE, NEVADA, NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, and VIRGINIA

    PRIME-ARY PERSPECTIVE: MAINE, NEVADA, NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, and VIRGINIA PRIME-ARY Perspectives is a series that will give you an overview of the most noteworthy results from each state's primary election, focusing on congressional districts that are likely to be most competitive in November, as well as those that will have new representation in 2019 because of retirements. As always, please do not hesitate to reach out to us with questions! MAINE Yesterday, Maine became the first state in the country to use a "ranked- choice" voting system. The system allows for voters to rank the candidates from favorite to least favorite. If one candidate gets 50% + 1 vote, everything proceeds as usual; if not, vote counters gradually eliminate candidates with fewer votes. As candidates are eliminated, each vote they received goes to the whomever the individual voter chose as their next favorite candidate. This process goes on until there are two candidates and whichever one has the most votes is declared the winner. This process has earned the voting system the alternate moniker of the "instant-runoff" system. The state's deeply unpopular governor, Paul LePage (R), has threatened to refuse to certify the primary results, calling the new system "the most horrific thing in the world." This year, Maine will hold elections for all of its statewide races, one Senate seat, and its 2 seats in the House of Representatives. GUBERNATORIAL Gov. Paul LePage won reelection in 2014, at least partially because an independent candidate won 8.4% of the vote. This election is one of the reasons that the state transitioned to its ranked-voting (as described above).
  • US Election Insight 2014

    US Election Insight 2014

    dentons.com US Election Insight 2014 Election results data contained in this report re lect data available as of 8:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on November 5, 2014. The boisterous sea of liberty is never without a wave Thomas Jeerson 2014 Election Results The Republican Senate Drought Ends In a Deluge For the past eight years, Republicans sought to reclaim As October closed, polling momentum favored the their Congressional majority, but their eorts to achieve Republicans, and Democrats faced lower than expected election night victory fell short of the mark. Last night, turnout among their base, including African Americans, riding a wave of enthusiasm among their supporters Democratic women, Hispanics and young voters. The and bolstered by voter frustration with the Obama general discontent of many voters toward Congress in administration, Republican candidates across the country general and President Obama in particular meant that delivered victories in virtually every key race. With at least a traditionally Republican-friendly issues like opposition to seven seat gain in the US Senate and an increase of more the Aordable Care Act, national security, the economy, than 10 seats in the US House of Representatives, the 2014 and even the Ebola epidemic in West Africa held sway with election was an unmitigated success for Republicans, voters, who ignored Democratic claims of an improving aording them an opportunity to set the agenda for the economy and the dangers of a Republican congress. last two years of the Obama presidency and setting the This last appeal was notably ineective with women stage for a wide open presidential election in 2016.
  • 2021 State Legislative Session Calendar

    2021 State Legislative Session Calendar

    2021 State Legislative Session Calendar State Convenes Adjourns In Person/Virtual Governor Composition Senate House D R D R Alabama 2-2-2021 5-17-2021 In Person Kay Ivey (R) 7 26 28 76 Alaska 1-19-2021 4-19-2021 In Person Mike Dunleavy (R) 7 13 16 23 Arizona 1-11-2021 4-23-2021 In Person Doug Ducey (R) 13 17 29 31 Arkansas 1-11-2021 3-12-2021 In Person Asa Hutchinson (R) 9 26 24 76 California 1-11-2021 9-11-2021 In Person Gavin Newsom (D) 30 9 60 19 Colorado 1-13-2021 5-12-2021 In Person Jared Polis (D) 19 16 41 24 Connecticut 1-6-2021 5-12-2021 Virtual Ned Lamont (D) 22 14 91 60 Delaware 1-11-2021 6-30-2021 Virtual John Carney (D) 14 7 26 15 District of Columbia 1-2-2021 12-31-2021 Virtual Mayor Muriel Bowser 13* Florida 3-2-2021 4-30-2021 In Person Ron DeSantis (R) 17 23 47 73 Georgia 1-11-2021 4-2-2021 In Person (Likely) Brian Kemp (R) 21 34 75 105 Hawaii 1-20-2021 5-9-2021 TBD David Ige (D) 24 1 46 5 Idaho 1-11-2021 3-20-2021 In Person Brad Little (R) 7 28 14 56 Illinois 1-11-2021 1-13-2023 In Person JB Pritzker (D) 40 19 74 44 Indiana 1-5-2021 3-14-2021 In Person Eric Holcomb (R) 11 39 29 71 Iowa 1-11-2021 4-30-2021 In Person Kim Reynolds (R) 18 32 47 53 Kansas 1-11-2021 4-11-2021 In Person Laura Kelly (D) 11 29 41 84 Kentucky 1-5-2021 3-30-2021 In Person Andy Beshear (D) 9 29 39 61 Louisiana 4-12-2021 6-10-2021 In Person John Bel Edwards (D) 12 27 35 68 Maine 12-2-2020 6-16-2021 In Person Janet Mills (D) 21 13 80 67 Maryland 1-13-2021 4-9-2021 In Person Larry Hogan (R) 32 15 98 42 Massachusetts 1-6-2021 12-31-2021 Hybrid Charlie
  • 1 in the Shadow of Trump: How the 2016 Presidential Contest Affected

    1 in the Shadow of Trump: How the 2016 Presidential Contest Affected

    In the Shadow of Trump: How the 2016 Presidential Contest Affected House and Senate Primaries Prepared for the 2017 State of the Parties Conference, Akron, Ohio Robert G. Boatright, Clark University [email protected] The presidential race did not quite monopolize all of the uncivil or bizarre moments of the summer of 2016. One of the more interesting exchanges took place in Arizona in August of 2016, during the weeks before the state’s Senate primary election. Senator John McCain, always a somewhat unpredictable politician, has had difficulties in his last two primaries. Perhaps because he was perceived as having strayed too far toward the political center, or perhaps simply because his presidential bid had created some distance between McCain and Arizonans, he faced a vigorous challenge in 2010 from conservative talk show host and former Congressman J. D. Hayworth. McCain ultimately beat back Hayworth’s challenge, 56 percent to 32 percent, but only after a bitter campaign in which McCain spent a total of over $21 million and abandoned much of his “maverick” positioning and presented himself as a staunch conservative and a fierce opponent of illegal immigration (Steinhauer 2010). His task was made easier by his ability to attack Hayworth’s own checkered career in Congress. In 2016, McCain again faced a competitive primary opponent, physician, Tea Party activist, and two-term State Senator Kelli Ward. Ward, like Hayworth, argued that McCain was not conservative enough for Arizona. Ward was (and is), however, a decade younger than Hayworth, and her shorter tenure in political office made it harder for McCain to attack her.
  • GUIDE to the 116Th CONGRESS

    GUIDE to the 116Th CONGRESS

    th GUIDE TO THE 116 CONGRESS - SECOND SESSION Table of Contents Click on the below links to jump directly to the page • Health Professionals in the 116th Congress……….1 • 2020 Congressional Calendar.……………………..……2 • 2020 OPM Federal Holidays………………………..……3 • U.S. Senate.……….…….…….…………………………..…...3 o Leadership…...……..…………………….………..4 o Committee Leadership….…..……….………..5 o Committee Rosters……….………………..……6 • U.S. House..……….…….…….…………………………...…...8 o Leadership…...……………………….……………..9 o Committee Leadership……………..….…….10 o Committee Rosters…………..…..……..…….11 • Freshman Member Biographies……….…………..…16 o Senate………………………………..…………..….16 o House……………………………..………..………..18 Prepared by Hart Health Strategies Inc. www.hhs.com, updated 7/17/20 Health Professionals Serving in the 116th Congress The number of healthcare professionals serving in Congress increased for the 116th Congress. Below is a list of Members of Congress and their area of health care. Member of Congress Profession UNITED STATES SENATE Sen. John Barrasso, MD (R-WY) Orthopaedic Surgeon Sen. John Boozman, OD (R-AR) Optometrist Sen. Bill Cassidy, MD (R-LA) Gastroenterologist/Heptalogist Sen. Rand Paul, MD (R-KY) Ophthalmologist HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Rep. Ralph Abraham, MD (R-LA-05)† Family Physician/Veterinarian Rep. Brian Babin, DDS (R-TX-36) Dentist Rep. Karen Bass, PA, MSW (D-CA-37) Nurse/Physician Assistant Rep. Ami Bera, MD (D-CA-07) Internal Medicine Physician Rep. Larry Bucshon, MD (R-IN-08) Cardiothoracic Surgeon Rep. Michael Burgess, MD (R-TX-26) Obstetrician Rep. Buddy Carter, BSPharm (R-GA-01) Pharmacist Rep. Scott DesJarlais, MD (R-TN-04) General Medicine Rep. Neal Dunn, MD (R-FL-02) Urologist Rep. Drew Ferguson, IV, DMD, PC (R-GA-03) Dentist Rep. Paul Gosar, DDS (R-AZ-04) Dentist Rep.
  • Rosen V. Tarkanian 135 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 59 (2019)

    Rosen V. Tarkanian 135 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 59 (2019)

    135 Nev., Advance Opinion 561 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JACKY ROSEN, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND No. 73274 ROSEN FOR NEVADA, A 527 ORGANIZATION, Appellants, FILE vs. DANNY TARKANIAN, DEC 1 2 2019 Respondent. Appeal from a district court order denying an anti-SLAPP special motion to dismiss in a tort action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jerry A. Wiese, Judge. Reversed and remanded with instructions. Perkins Coie LLP and Marc E. Elias, Elisabeth C. Frost, and Amanda R. Callais, Washington, D.C.; Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP, and Bradley Schrager and Daniel Bravo, Las Vegas, for Appellants. Randazza Legal Group, PLLC, and Marc J. Randazza and Alex J. Shepard, Las Vegas, for Respondent. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA IGI- 9-041)-b BEFORE THE COURT EN BANC.' OPINION By the Court, HARDESTY, J.: In this appeal, we consider the appropriate test for determining if protected communications are made in "good faith" under Nevada's anti- SLAPP statutes. At issue in this case are allegedly defamatory statements made by appellant Jacky Rosen during her political campaign against respondent Danny Tarkanian. After being sued for defamation by Tarkanian, Rosen filed a special motion to dismiss the action under the anti- SLAPP statutes, which require her to demonstrate that the protected statements were made in good faith—that is, that they were true or made without knowledge of any falsehood. We hold that, in determining whether the communications were made in good faith, the court must consider the "gist or stine of the communications as a whole, rather than parsing individual words in the communications.
  • Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law About the Brennan Center for Justice

    Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law About the Brennan Center for Justice

    B R E N N A N CENTER FOR JUSTICE VOTING LAW CHANGES IN 2012 Wendy R. Weiser and Lawrence Norden Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law about the brennan center for justice The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public policy and law institute that focuses on the fundamental issues of democracy and justice. Our work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from racial justice in criminal law to presidential power in the fight against terrorism. A singular institution—part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group—the Brennan Center combines scholarship, legislative and legal advocacy, and communications to win meaningful, measurable change in the public sector. About the Brennan Center’s Democracy Program The Brennan Center’s Democracy Program works to repair the broken systems of American democracy. We encourage broad citizen participation by promoting voting and campaign reform. We work to secure fair courts and to advance a First Amendment jurisprudence that puts the right of citizens—not special interests—at the center of our democracy. We collaborate with grassroots groups, advocacy organizations, and government officials to eliminate the obstacles to an effective democracy. acknowledgements The Brennan Center gratefully acknowledges the Bauman Foundation, Carnegie Corporation of New York, Democracy Alliance Partners, Ford Foundation, The Joyce Foundation, The Irving B. Harris Foundation, Mitchell Kapor Foundation, Michael Kieschnick, Nancy Meyer and Marc Weiss, Open Society Foundations, Rockefeller Family Fund, Tides Advocacy Fund, and Wallace Global Fund for their generous support of our voting work.