DOCSLIB.ORG

The 2010 Senate Landscape Is Almost Evenly Split Down The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ELECTION 2010 ELECTION 2010 The 2010 Senate landscape is almost evenly split down the middle: Republicans will be defending 18 seats, while Democrats will be defending 19 seats, including the January special election in Massachusetts. The Senate Watchlist BY CHARLES MAHTESIAN CONNECTICUT NEVada ARKANSAS COLORADO PENNSYLVANIA LOUISIANA CALIFORNIA NORTH CAROLINA WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH WHY TO WATCH Chris Dodd, a five-term Democrat, is arguably The only thing stopping Senate Majority Leader In a state where John McCain crushed Barack Democrat Michael Bennet, appointed Democratic Sen. Arlen Specter faces what may Just when it looked like GOP Sen. David Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer won a There’s no scandal or silver-bullet issue. He’s the party’s most vulnerable Senate incumbent — Harry Reid from being rated as the most vulnerable Obama by 20 points in 2008 and where polls show to the Senate seat left vacant when Ken be the toughest election of his Senate career, Vitter might weather the scandal surrounding second term in 1998 by 10 percentage points reasonably well-funded. And unlike former GOP just look at the lengthy list of Republicans who are Democratic senator is the quality of his opposition. voters are deeply skeptical of Obama’s health care Salazar became interior secretary, has two which is saying something given the long arc of his the revelation that he was a client of a and a third in 2004 by 20 points. colleague Sen. Elizabeth Dole, who lost by a champing at the bit to take him on. Republicans struggled for months to come up plan, Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln has little tough races ahead of him in 2010. tenure in office. Washington prostitution ring, Democratic Still, Republicans convincing margin in 2008, Sen. Richard Burr Dodd has experienced marked improvement in with a top-tier challenger to Reid, despite his anemic room for error in her bid for a third term. The first is the August primary, where Before he can claim a sixth Rep. Charlie Melancon announced he would remain convinced that her has been attentive to the state. his poll ratings in recent months, a development no ratings in the polls. Now the GOP has at least three According to a late September Rasmussen poll, he’ll face former state House Speaker term, Specter must defeat challenge Vitter in 2010, ensuring that the polarizing style and liberal Yet Burr’s approval ratings are lagging, and doubt assisted by the Senate Ethics Committee’s prospective challengers — former state Republican she trails all four of her Republican opponents. Andrew Romanoff, a talented young pol who tenacious and cash-flush Rep. first-term conservative would get top-tier voting record make her it’s got Democrats convinced they can deny him August dismissal of complaints alleging that Dodd Party Chairwoman Sue Lowden, state Sen. Mark And the poll shows her trailing state Sen. Gilbert was bypassed for the appointment. Joe Sestak in the May primary, opposition. vulnerable in 2010. a second term in 2010. and Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) had received special Amodei and businessman Danny Tarkanian — but Baker by 8 points, 47 percent to 39 percent. Baker Much of the state Democratic then knock off Republican Democrats have The GOP has recruited While the field isn’t set yet, Democrats already mortgage deals from Countrywide Financial. none of them has ever run a race quite like this or has emerged as an early front-runner for the establishment has lined up behind Bennet former Rep. Pat Toomey. already signaled that they a heavyweight challenger have one well-known challenger planning to Yet the committee also noted that the two against a smash-mouth opponent quite like Reid. Republican nomination. — as has the White House, which sought to Sestak The Harrisburg and consider the prostitution Fiorina in former Hewlett-Packard run: Secretary of State Elaine Marshall, the should have “exercised more vigilance" to avoid If the GOP nominee turns out to be equal to the Lincoln, however, is well-prepared to stave off dissuade Romanoff from running — but in Washington Democratic scandal fair game, while CEO Carly Fiorina, but first woman elected to statewide office in North the appearance that they received preferential task, the general election may end up resembling the opposition. short order Romanoff has already picked up establishments are lined up Vitter has indicated that Fiorina has stumbled out of the gate, and it’s Carolina. treatment, so the issue isn’t entirely wiped away. the epic 2004 South Dakota battle between then- She raised nearly $4.6 million for her campaign a few Democratic endorsements. behind Specter, but that’s not Sestak’s audience President Barack Obama not clear how much of her own money she’ll According to a recent poll, Marshall trails Burr Leading the crowded GOP field is former Majority Leader Tom Daschle and Republican John through the end of June and had more than $3 It doesn’t get any easier after that. — he’s running to Specter’s left, in the hopes of Melancon — and his health care put into the race. by double digits. There’s still a long way to go, of three-term Rep. Rob Simmons, who was defeated Thune, fueled by national money and contingent million in her war chest at the time. Perhaps more A crowded Republican field is eager to winning over the party rank and file. plan — will play a central While a July Rasmussen Reports poll gave course, but few think the political conditions in for reelection in 2006. Simmons has led Dodd on whether the challenger can convince voters important, the recent chairmanship shuffle left her take on political newcomer Bennet, and it Toomey, once thought to be too conservative to role in the contest. Boxer a 45 percent to 41 percent lead — down 2010 will look anything like 2008, when Barack in head-to-head polling matchups for months; that Reid’s power hasn’t translated into results at the head of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition includes former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton — who be a viable statewide candidate in Pennsylvania, Vitter has relatively respectable approval from a 9-point lead in March — subsequent Obama narrowly carried the state, Kay Hagan Quinnipiac had him at a 5-percentage-point for Nevada — which is suffering from high and Forestry Committee — a key committee for ag- led Bennet by 9 points in a recent polling has tempered his style and is competitive with ratings in a state that Obama lost by a wide polls have not shown the race that tight, and knocked off Dole and Democrat Bev Perdue won advantage in mid-September. unemployment and foreclosure rates. dependent Arkansas. matchup. Specter in head-to-head matchups. margin, so he won’t be easy to dislodge. few see this as a top GOP pickup opportunity. the open governor’s race. THE SENatoR THE SENatoR THE SENatoR THE SENatoR THE SENatoR THE SENatoR THE SENatoR THE SENatoR Sen. Chris Dodd Sen. Harry Reid Sen. Blanche Lincoln Sen. Michael Bennet Sen. Arlen Specter Sen. David Vitter Sen. Barbara Sen. Richard Burr — (D-Conn.) (D-Nev.) (D-Ark.) (D-Colo.) (D-Pa.) (R-La.) Boxer (D-Calif.) (R-N.C.) AP AND Age: 65 Age: 69 Age: 49 Age: 44 Age: 79 Age: 48 Age: 68 Age: 53 HINKLE S Home:East Haddam Home: Searchlight Home: Little Rock Home: Denver Home: Philadelphia Home: Metairie Home: Rancho Home: Winston- OHN EUTERS First elected:1980 First elected: 1986 First elected: 1998 First elected: Appointed First elected: 1980 First elected: 2004 Mirage Salem J by Term: 5th Term: 4th Term: 2nd in January 2009 Term: 5th Term: 1st First elected: 1992 First elected: 2004 Term: 1st Term: 3rd Term: 1st hotos P POLITICO, R 2004 GENERAL DODD 2004 GENERAL REID 2004 GENERAL LINCOLN 2004 GENERAL BENNET 2004 GENERAL SPECTER 2004 VITTER 2004 GENERAL BOXER 2004 GENERAL BURR ELECTION APPRovaL ELECTION FavoRABILITY ELECTION APPRovaL ELECTION APPRovaL ELECTION APPRovaL ELECTION APPRovaL ELECTION APPRovaL ELECTION APPRovaL RatING RatING RatING RatING RatING RatING RatING RatING 66% 61% 56% 51% 53% 51% 58% 52% Approve Chris Dodd (D) Approve Harry Reid (D) Favorable Blanche Lincoln (D) Ken Salazar (D) Approve Arlen Specter (R) Approve David Vitter (R) Approve Barbara Boxer (D) Approve Richard Burr (R) Approve Disapprove Unfavorable Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove 32% Don't Know 35% Not Sure 44% Don't Know 47% Don't Know 42% Don't Know 29% Don't Know 38% Don't Know 47% Don't Know Jack Orchulli (R) Richard Ziser (R) Jim Holt (R) Pete Coors (R) Joe Hoeffel (D) Chris John (D) Bill Jones (R) Erskine Bowles (D) 54% 44% 15% 44% 48% 36% 38% 48% 51% 38% 2008 43% 2008 45% 2008 31% 2008 44% John Kennedy (D) 36% 2008 2008 31% PRESIDENTIAL 32% 29% PRESIDENTIAL PRESIDENTIAL 2008 PRESIDENTIAL 2008 PRESIDENTIAL 36% PRESIDENTIAL 20% RESULTS 20% RESULTS RESULTS PRESIDENTIAL RESULTS PRESIDENTIAL RESULTS RESULTS 1 Other 2 Other 1 Other 2 2 Other 1 Other RESULTS Other RESULTS 13% 8% 2 Other 9% 1 Other 1% Source: Public Policy Polling (D), Source: Public Policy Polling (D), Source: Public Policy Polling (D), Source: Public Policy Polling (D), Aug. 21-24; 784 voters (IVR) Aug. 14-16; 969 voters (IVR) July 17-19; 727 voters (IVR) Sept. 2-8; 600 voters (IVR) 38 43 45 44 37 49 McCain McCain 55 McCain McCain McCain 50 61 54 McCain 54 59 40 61 OBAMA Obama OBAMA Obama OBAMA 59 39 OBAMA Obama OBAMA OBAMA OBAMA Obama Obama OBAMA APPRovaL APPRovaL McCain Obama APPRovaL APPRovaL Obama APPRovaL McCain Obama APPRovaL APPRovaL APPRovaL RatING RatING RatING RatING RatING RatING RatING RatING Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Disapprove VotER Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove VotER Disapprove VotER VotER VotER VotER VotER REGISTRatION Don't Know REGISTRatION Don't Know Don't Know REGISTRatION Don't Know REGISTRatION Don't Know Don't Know/ REGISTRatION Don't Know REGISTRatION Don't Know REGISTRatION Won't Say 43% 33% 60% 46% 37% 57% VotER 62% 51% 44% Democrat Democrat 53% Democrat Democrat 53% Democrat Democrat 52% 46% REGISTRatION 48% 51% 49% Democrat 53% 47% 20% 36% 36% 33% 42% 39% 31% 32% There is no party 37% 25% 35% Republican Republican 37% Republican registration in Republican Republican Republican Republican 43% 21% Arkansas.
Recommended publications
  • Approval of George W. Bush: Economic and Media Impacts Gino Tozzi Jr

    Approval of George W. Bush: Economic and Media Impacts Gino Tozzi Jr

    Wayne State University Wayne State University Dissertations 1-1-2011 Approval of George W. Bush: Economic and media impacts Gino Tozzi Jr. Wayne State University, Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations Part of the Mass Communication Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Tozzi Jr., Gino, "Approval of George W. Bush: Economic and media impacts" (2011). Wayne State University Dissertations. Paper 260. This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. APPROVAL OF GEORGE W. BUSH: ECONOMIC AND MEDIA IMPACTS by GINO J. TOZZI JR. DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2011 MAJOR: POLITICAL SCIENCE Approved by: _________________________________ Chair Date _________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ © COPYRIGHT BY GINO J. TOZZI JR. 2011 All Rights Reserved DEDICATION To my Father ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want to thank my committee chair Professor Ewa Golebiowska for the encouragement and persistence on only accepting the best from me in this process. I also owe my committee of Professor Ronald Brown, Professor Jodi Nachtwey, and Professor David Martin a debt of gratitude for their help and advisement in this endeavor. All of them were instrumental in keeping my focus narrowed to produce the best research possible. I also owe appreciation to the commentary, suggestions, and research help from my wonderful wife Courtney Tozzi. This project was definitely more enjoyable with her encouragement and help.
  • Transcript of a Recording of a Meeting Between the President and John Dean on February 27, 1973, from 3:55 to 4:20 P.M

    Transcript of a Recording of a Meeting Between the President and John Dean on February 27, 1973, from 3:55 to 4:20 P.M

    TRANSCRIPT OF A RECORDING OF A MEETING BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT AND JOHN DEAN ON FEBRUARY 27, 1973, FROM 3:55 TO 4:20 P.M. TRANSCRIPT OF A RECORDTNG OF A MEETING BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT AND JOHN DEAN ON FEBRUARY 27, 1973, FROM 3:55 TO 4:20 P.M. PRESIDENT: Good afternoon, John, how are you? DEAN: Pretty good. PRESIDENT: I, uh, discarded some (unintelligible) won't interrupt us (unintelligible) uh, uh, did you get your talk with Kleindienst yet? DEAN: I just had a good talk with him. PRESIDENT: Yeah, fine. Have you got him, uh, positioned properly, the uh-- DEAN: I think, I think he is. PRESIDENT: (Unintelligible) properly--ah, has he talked yet to Baker? DEAN: No, he hasn't, he, uh, he called Sam Ervin and offered to come visit with both he and Baker. And, uh, that was done last week. PRESIDENT: Uh, huh. DEAN: But he thought that timing would be bad to call Baker prior to the joint meeting. So he says after I have that joint meeting, I'll start working my relationship with Baker. PRESIDENT: Well, Baker left with me that he was going to, going to set up a joint meeting well, anyway (unintelligible). I see. So Kleindienst has talked to, uh, uh, he has talked to Ervin and Ervin said-- (unintelligible). DEAN: Ervin has left it dangling and said, "I'll be back in touch with you.” Uh, I think-, what, what disturbs Me a little bit about Baker was his move to put his own man in as minority counsel, so quickly, without any consultation as he had promised consultation.
  • The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964

    The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964

    THE LONG RED THREAD HOW DEMOCRATIC DOMINANCE GAVE WAY TO REPUBLICAN ADVANTAGE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS, 1964-2018 by Kyle Kondik A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland September 2019 © 2019 Kyle Kondik All Rights Reserved Abstract This history of U.S. House elections from 1964-2018 examines how Democratic dominance in the House prior to 1994 gave way to a Republican advantage in the years following the GOP takeover. Nationalization, partisan realignment, and the reapportionment and redistricting of House seats all contributed to a House where Republicans do not necessarily always dominate, but in which they have had an edge more often than not. This work explores each House election cycle in the time period covered and also surveys academic and journalistic literature to identify key trends and takeaways from more than a half-century of U.S. House election results in the one person, one vote era. Advisor: Dorothea Wolfson Readers: Douglas Harris, Matt Laslo ii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction: From Dark Blue to Light Red………………………………………………1 Data, Definitions, and Methodology………………………………………………………9 Chapter One: The Partisan Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States House of Representatives, 1964-1974…………………………...…12 Chapter 2: The Roots of the Republican Revolution:
  • January 2010 Franklin & Marshall College Poll

    January 2010 Franklin & Marshall College Poll

    For immediate release Wednesday, January 27, 2010 January 2010 Franklin & Marshall College Poll SURVEY OF PENNSYLVANIANS SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Prepared by: Center for Opinion Research Floyd Institute for Public Policy Franklin & Marshall College BERWOOD A. YOST DIRECTOR, FLOYD INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY DIRECTOR, CENTER FOR OPINION RESEARCH HEAD METHODOLOGIST, FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE POLL G. TERRY MADONNA DIRECTOR, CENTER FOR POLITICS AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS DIRECTOR, FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE POLL JENNIFER L. HARDING PROJECT MANAGER, CENTER FOR OPINION RESEARCH PROJECT MANAGER, FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE POLL KAY K. HUEBNER PROGRAMMER, CENTER FOR OPINION RESEARCH January 26, 2010 Table of Contents METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 2 KEY FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................ 4 THE RACE FOR PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR ...................................................................4 THE RACE FOR U.S. SENATE ...............................................................................................5 ARLEN SPECTER ...................................................................................................................6 TABLE A-1 ............................................................................................................................... 8 TABLE A-2 ..............................................................................................................................
  • The Watergate Story (Washingtonpost.Com)

    The Watergate Story (Washingtonpost.Com)

    The Watergate Story (washingtonpost.com) Hello corderoric | Change Preferences | Sign Out TODAY'S NEWSPAPER Subscribe | PostPoints NEWS POLITICS OPINIONS BUSINESS LOCAL SPORTS ARTS & GOING OUT JOBS CARS REAL RENTALS CLASSIFIEDS LIVING GUIDE ESTATE SEARCH: washingtonpost.com Web | Search Archives washingtonpost.com > Politics> Special Reports 'Deep Throat' Mark Felt Dies at 95 The most famous anonymous source in American history died Dec. 18 at his home in Santa Rosa, Calif. "Whether ours shall continue to be a government of laws and not of men is now before Congress and ultimately the American people." A curious crime, two young The courts, the Congress and President Nixon refuses to After 30 years, one of reporters, and a secret source a special prosecutor probe release the tapes and fires the Washington's best-kept known as "Deep Throat" ... the burglars' connections to special prosecutor. A secrets is exposed. —Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox after his Washington would be the White House and decisive Supreme Court firing, Oct. 20, 1973 changed forever. discover a secret taping ruling is a victory for system. investigators. • Q&A Transcript: John Dean's new book "Pure Goldwater" (May 6, 2008) • Obituary: Nixon Aide DeVan L. Shumway, 77 (April 26, 2008) Wg:1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/watergate/index.html#chapters[6/14/2009 6:06:08 PM] The Watergate Story (washingtonpost.com) • Does the News Matter To Anyone Anymore? (Jan. 20, 2008) • Why I Believe Bush Must Go (Jan. 6, 2008) Key Players | Timeline | Herblock
  • Guns, Grass, and God's Wrath, Colorado's Budget, Politics, and Elections

    Guns, Grass, and God's Wrath, Colorado's Budget, Politics, and Elections

    Guns, Grass, and God’s Wrath, Colorado’s Budget, Politics, and Elections Michael J. Berry University of Colorado, Denver I. Introduction At the 2014 Democratic Party Assembly, incumbent Governor John Hickenlooper lamented that no “other state in the union . has been through as much as Colorado has in the past couple of years.” His statement was an implicit reference to a number of recent tragedies in the state. Among the most prominent were the 2012 Aurora movie theater shooting, the callous murder of Department of Corrections director Tom Clements in his home in early 2013, and the most dev- astating forest fires and floods to ever hit the state in June and September 2013. Hickenlooper’s statement on the uniqueness of the state, however, could just as easily apply to the state’s politi- cal realm. Colorado received considerable notoriety from the commencement of recreational marijuana sales on January 1, 2014. In a carefully staged photo opportunity, Iraq war veteran, Sean Azzariti, made the first legal recreational marijuana purchase as the state embarked on a grand social ex- periment. The prior year witnessed the first recall elections in state history resulting in the re- moval of two Democratic legislators from office including Senate President John Morse. An ad- ditional state senator facing a strong recall effort resigned under pressure. These highly charged campaigns to remove legislators were in response to the enactment of several controversial gun control laws. The legalization of recreational marijuana and the fight over gun control grabbed the lion’s share of headlines in the state over the past year.
  • Howard H. Baker, Jr

    Howard H. Baker, Jr

    Howard H. Baker, Jr. Howard H. Baker, Jr. served three terms as a United States Senator from Tennessee (1967-1985) and was Tennessee's first popularly elected Republican Senator. He rose to national prominence during the Watergate Hearings of 1973-1974 as Vice Chairman of the Senate Watergate Committee, the highest ranking Republican on the Committee. He served as Minority Leader of the Senate from 1977-1981 and as Majority Leader from 1981 until he retired from the Senate at the end of this third term in January, 1985. He was a candidate for the 1980 Republican presidential nomination and served as President Ronald Reagan's Chief of Staff in 1987-1988. For the next thirteen years he worked in several Tennessee law firms. In 2001 President George W. Bush appointed him as U.S. Ambassador to Japan. Howard Henry Baker, Jr. was born to Howard Henry Baker and Dora Ladd Baker on November 15, 1925 in Huntsville, Tennessee. His mother died when he was eight years old and his maternal grandmother, Lillie Ladd Mauser, helped raise him and his younger sister. When Howard Baker Jr. was eleven, his father married Irene Bailey. Howard Jr. attended primary and secondary public school in Huntsville before going to the McCallie School, a military preparatory school in Chattanooga, in 1941. He graduated from there in 1943 and immediately enlisted in the U.S. Navy. As a candidate in the Navy's V-12 officer training program, Baker studied electrical engineering at the University of the South in Sewanee, Tennessee and at Tulane University.
  • Presidential Appointments by Name, S” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R

    Presidential Appointments by Name, S” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R

    The original documents are located in Box 40, folder “Personnel - Presidential Appointments by Name, S” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 40 of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library 11/15/7. To: Bill alker From: Pbll Buchea I ""' rNmbe.r 14. 1974 Dear rba I have aae4 oa fO'U' rMOIImlnldatlGa to the appropriate aatllorltle• at tM HoaH n It wtU M cma cant.! eoulderatl • l did •aJoy Dlf rW nte.-a to Ciraad a 4• aDCI oaly wlall It eoold laan ...._ for a :to.c•r Ylalt. Allll • B ehea CCMUUtel to tAa. re•W•IIl .....r. H .. L. Y'aader eWcaa t.el Corperatloe 1501 BDcJaaaaa • • Grud a ••· To: Mr. William Walker From: .Eva DaqMrey Mr. Buchen ha• uked me to ••• you copie• of the attached co.cerabac DaYle Jtobiuoa &ad WiW.•m laaforcl. Sbace Wr.
  • Survey of Pennsylvanians on the 2004 Presidential Election

    Survey of Pennsylvanians on the 2004 Presidential Election

    The Morning Call/ Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion SURVEY OF PENNSYLVANIANS ON THE 2004 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION KEY FINDINGS REPORT October 22, 2004 KEY FINDINGS: 1. The race for Pennsylvanian’s crucial electoral votes for president remains extremely close with John Kerry leading George Bush by 2 percentage points. This lead is well within the poll’s margin of error 2. Pennsylvanians remain extremely divided in their views of President Bush, with almost identical percentages of commonwealth voters viewing him favorably in relation to those viewing him unfavorably. 3. Pennsylvanians rate president Bush as the candidate who would better handle the issue of terrorism, while Senator Kerry is rated higher on his ability to handle the issues of the economy and health care. 4. While a majority of Pennsylvania voters feel that the war in Iraq was not worth the costs paid by the United States, the state’s electorate is split on which candidate would better handle the situation in Iraq. 5. The war in Iraq and the economy are identified as the two most important issues upon which Pennsylvania voters will make their decision in the presidential race, with terrorism a close third. 6. For individuals that identified terrorism as the main issue that will decide their presidential vote, Bush is preferred by an overwhelming 4 to 1 margin. 7. Pennsylvanians demonstrate significant pessimism about the direction of the state’s economy, with John Kerry the overwhelming choice of voters who see the state’s economy as worse than last year. METHODOLOGY: The following key findings report summarizes data collected in a telephone survey of 787 registered voters in the state of Pennsylvania between October 17 and 21, 2004.
  • Pennsylvania House of Representatives Bipartisan Management Committee

    Pennsylvania House of Representatives Bipartisan Management Committee

    PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BIPARTISAN MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ORAL HISTORY PROJECT INTERVIEW WITH: The Honorable David Sweet (D) 48th District Washington County 1977-1988 INTERVIEW CONDUCTED BY: Jesse Teitelbaum, Research Analyst July 19, 2011 Transcribed by: Erin Miller © Copyright, Pennsylvania House of Representatives, Office of the Chief Clerk 1 Jesse Teitelbaum (JT): Good morning. The Honorable David Sweet (DS): Hello, Jesse. How are you? JT: I‟m well, thank you. DS: Good. JT: I‟m sitting here with David Sweet, who represented the 48th District, a Democrat from Washington County, from 1977 to 1988. Thank you for being with me. DS: Well, thank you for having me. It‟s great to be able to memorialize some of the memories and the things that happened over the years while I was in the Legislature, and I‟m not sure, like many things, I‟m not sure anyone will ever view this or read it, but it‟s probably good to have it all on the record. It‟s great. JT: Absolutely, absolutely. What I‟d like to do is start out just by asking you some questions about your early life. DS: Sure. JT: Tell me about your childhood, where you grew up, your family, and some of your early education. 2 DS: Well, I grew up in Washington, Pennsylvania, which is a little town. It was about 20 thousand then – it‟s probably not much more than 12 or 13 thousand now –25 miles southwest of Pittsburgh. JT: Okay. DS: And Washington – Little Washington to some people because people would drive through – Route 40 was the old national pike, and the interstate was actually built when I was a very small child that went around Washington, Pennsylvania, but many people knew of Washington, Pennsylvania, because they had to slog right through the main street of the town, as you did many towns before the interstate highway system, and it was Little Washington, but it was a good little town.
  • Who Is the Attorney General's Client?

    Who Is the Attorney General's Client?

    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDL\87-3\NDL305.txt unknown Seq: 1 20-APR-12 11:03 WHO IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S CLIENT? William R. Dailey, CSC* Two consecutive presidential administrations have been beset with controversies surrounding decision making in the Department of Justice, frequently arising from issues relating to the war on terrorism, but generally giving rise to accusations that the work of the Department is being unduly politicized. Much recent academic commentary has been devoted to analyzing and, typically, defending various more or less robust versions of “independence” in the Department generally and in the Attorney General in particular. This Article builds from the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Board, in which the Court set forth key principles relating to the role of the President in seeing to it that the laws are faithfully executed. This Article draws upon these principles to construct a model for understanding the Attorney General’s role. Focusing on the question, “Who is the Attorney General’s client?”, the Article presumes that in the most important sense the American people are the Attorney General’s client. The Article argues, however, that that client relationship is necessarily a mediated one, with the most important mediat- ing force being the elected head of the executive branch, the President. The argument invokes historical considerations, epistemic concerns, and constitutional structure. Against a trend in recent commentary defending a robustly independent model of execu- tive branch lawyering rooted in the putative ability and obligation of executive branch lawyers to alight upon a “best view” of the law thought to have binding force even over plausible alternatives, the Article defends as legitimate and necessary a greater degree of presidential direction in the setting of legal policy.
  • The Case of the “Ground Zero Mosque” Controversy 

    The Case of the “Ground Zero Mosque” Controversy 

    A Theoretical Study of Solidarity in American Society: The Case of the “Ground Zero Mosque” Controversy Fatemeh Mohammadi1 * , Hamed Mousavi2 1. PhD Candidate in Anthropology, Carleton University, Canada (Corresponding Author: [email protected]) 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Regional Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran ([email protected]) (Received: 5 Mar. 2017 Accepted: 8 Aug. 2017) Abstract The paper uses the case study of the controversy regarding the construction of a mosque near the site of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in Manhattan, New York, to analyze the different theoretical approaches to the concept of solidarity. It is argued that the presence of affectional solidarity which is based on feelings of caring, friendship and love was very limited in the case under study. Instead the primary form of solidarity present in the ground zero mosque debate was conventional solidarity, which is based primarily on common interests and concerns that are established through shared traditions and values. Nevertheless, conventional solidarity uses membership within a group to advocate for solidarity. In many instances however, people in need of solidarity might fall outside of the boundaries of “we,” and as a result limiting the utility of the approach. This is why the paper advocates for a revised form of Jodi Dean’s reflective solidarity, which is based on mutual responsibility toward each other despite our differences. It is argued that in its current form this approach is a normative universal ideal which holds great potential but is unclear, underspecified and impractical. However, by injecting some “realism” into this theoretical approach, reflective solidarity is superior to affectional and conventional approaches.