Domitia Longina: an Underestimated Augusta (C. 53-126/8)*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Domitia Longina: an Underestimated Augusta (C. 53-126/8)* DOMITIA LONGINA: AN UNDERESTIMATED AUGUSTA (C. 53-126/8)* Abstract: The article considers Domitia Longina’s long life, espe- cially the first forty years during which she was continually faced with tragedy, much of it associated with her marriage to Domitian. She emerged with a blighted reputation and abundant adverse criticism from the ancient authors. By systematically examining the evidence relating to Domitia: the literature, epigraphy and the iconography on coins, statues and miniature portraits, the article presents a woman who was strong and resolute in adversity. A re-classification of her portraiture reveals a Third Portrait Type of a post-Domitian Domitia, a woman still held in high regard and adaptable to change. INTRODUCTION Domitia Longina was the last of the Julio-Claudians and the Flavians. In 81, within weeks of his accession, her husband Domitian made her Augusta in recognition of her importance to the Flavian succession.1 She survived the assassination of her husband in 96 and remained Augusta through the reigns of the next two emperors, Nerva and Trajan, and for the first decade of Hadrian’s reign2 until her death c. 126/8. She was Augusta for forty-five years and for over half of that time the only impe- rial lady to hold that title.3 Domitia suffered many personal tragedies, tremendous grief, and serious allegations of misbehaviour. She was * I am indebted to Dr. Frederik J. Vervaet for his suggestion that I include the long- lived Domitia Longina in my study of Trajanic and Hadrianic Imperial Ladies, an inclu- sion that has proven worthwhile in revealing other aspects of this remarkable woman’s life. I should especially like to thank Emeritus Professor Ronald Ridley, Dr. Christopher Dart and Dr. Frederik Vervaet for their steadfast encouragement and generous scholarly advice, and my sister Elspeth Joyce for her valuable contributions. 1 Dom. 3. Fifty-three imperial women received this honour, Domitia was possibly the tenth; Stevenson (1964) 99. Livia did not receive this honour from Augustus during his lifetime, but was granted it in his will: Tac. Ann. 1.8; Suet. Aug. 101.2; Dio 56.46.1; Hahn (2005) 738-739. An Augusta transmitted dynastic power: Flory (1988) 115. 2 Domitian (PIR² D 181, Stein); Raepsaet-Charlier (1987) 327; Eder (2004) 634. 3 Domitia was Augusta with Julia Titi for six years from 81 to 87, alone for seventeen years from 88 to 105 when Marciana and Plotina accepted the honour. From 105 after the death of Marciana, Domitia shared the honour of the title with Plotina and Salonia ­Matidia for seventeen years. After the deaths of these two imperial ladies, Domitia was once again the only Augusta from 122 until her death in 126/8, or until Sabina became Augusta in 128. Ancient Society 45, 205-266. doi: 10.2143/AS.45.0.3110548 © 2015 by Ancient Society. All rights reserved. 98256.indb 205 9/11/15 14:35 206 T.E. FRASER often in grave danger. Yet she also experienced great popularity and her iconography is a clear indication of her strength, adaptability, and reso- lution in the face of adversity. This paper will show how remarkable the survival of Domitia Augusta was, especially through a new interpreta- tion of her portraiture, which suggests that even post-Domitian she con- tinued to have an active life and even a limited public rôle. As such, it will demonstrate how through a comprehensive analysis of Domitia’s life, her representation in ancient literature and iconography on coins, statues and busts that a more accurate understanding of her can be constructed. THE STATE OF EXISTING SCHOLARSHIP Modern scholarship discussing the official position, life and public rep- resentations of Domitia Longina varies enormously from general publi- cations on the imperial women by such authors as McDermott and Orentzel, Setälä and Burns,4 to more thorough biographies of the emperor Domitian by Jones and Morelli that include detailed and useful sections interpreting the rôle of his wife.5 In addition there are a number of excellent articles, most notably by Syme, Castritius, Vinson, Varner, Chausson, Vervaet, Hidalgo de la Vega,6 all of which, with the excep- tion of Morelli,7 have provided short biographical sketches or discus- sions of particular issues related to Domitia. Syme (1958) was the first of the modern scholars to consider Domi- tia’s pedigree,8 which Chausson (2003) expanded upon, recognising the enormous advantages she would bring into a marriage with the Flavians,9 and thus providing a background for her life. In an unfortunate attempt to assess her character Syme (1970) is perhaps too harsh, describing her as “an arrogant woman, not unworthy of her grandfather, the rancorous senator from the back country of a confederate Italia” and whose father’s 4 McDermott & Orentzel (1979); Setälä (2002); Burns (2007). 5 Jones (1992) and Morelli (2014). 6 Syme (1958, 1970, 1981, 1982/3, 1983, 1991); Castritius (1969), also in Temporini (2002); Vinson (1989); 513-540; Varner (1995); Vervaet (1999, 2000, 2002, 2003); Chausson (2003); Hidalgo de la Vega (2003). 7 Morelli (2010). This requires a closer examination of Varner’s classification of Domitia’s portraiture. 8 Syme (1958) 560-561; (1970) 34-37. 9 Chausson (2003) 110. 98256.indb 206 9/11/15 14:35 DOMITIA LONGINA: AN UNDERESTIMATED AUGUSTA (C. 53-126/8) 207 cousin Vistilia was “frank and shameless.”10 Chausson (2003) considers the teenage Domitia to have been a scheming young woman intent on snaring Domitian. While McDermott and Orentzel (1976) and Burns (2007) accept without question many of the salacious anecdotes in the ancient sources relating to Domitia and Julia Titi,11 Vinson (1989) offers an alternative interpretation of such ancient rumours, maintaining that the vilification of imperial women was a deliberate ploy to destroy their reputations and that of the emperor,12 Hidalgo de la Vega (2003) links this invective not only to Domitian’s behaviour, but also to the anxiety of the Senate over the possibility of reliving the terrible effect of succes- sion passing through the female line. Morelli (2010) in his investigation into the demise of the Flavian dynasty also recognises the importance of the Senate, their dwindling support for Domitian and his lack of an heir. He suggests that Domitia’s failure in this regard encouraged her to plot against her husband. More recently Morelli (2014) has benefitted from further work by Vervaet in understanding Domitia predominantly as a political pawn in serious dynastic issues. Other modern authors, such as Townend (1961), and Castritius (1969, 2002), and particularly Vervaet (2000), paint a broader picture, showing how her family, their connec- tions and political alliances played an important part in Domitia’s life.13 Many modern scholars have written about Roman women in art such as Wegner, Daltrop, Hausmann, Bieber, Fittschen, Zanker, Kleiner, Matheson, Alexandridis and Fejfer,14 but none has written exclusively on the coinage of the imperial ladies. Chausson (2003), while giving the most detailed analysis of Domitia’s life and ancestry based on the liter- ary, epigraphic and archaeological evidence, unfortunately includes no discussion of the iconographical evidence of her coins and statuary, whereas Varner (1995) provides a glimpse of the woman and the politi- cal scene behind her different types of portraiture.15 McDermott and 10 This Vistilia was the niece of Corbulo’s mother, also Vistilia: Syme (1970) 27-39. 11 For instance, rumours related by Suetonius (Dom. 21, 22) that Domitia had an affair with the actor Paris, and also that Julia was seduced by Domitian after her marriage, both during her father Titus’ lifetime and after the deaths of Titus and her husband (T. Flavius Sabinus). McDermott & Orentzel (1979); Burns (2007). 12 Indeed, Burns does not reference Vinson (1989) 431-450, in Chapter 5 of Great Women of Imperial Rome. 13 Townend (1961) 54-62; Castritius (1969) 492-502; Castritius in Temporini (2002) 164-186; Vervaet (2000) 95-113. 14 Wegner (1956); Daltrop e.a. (1966); Bieber (1977); Fittschen & Zanker (1983); Kleiner and Matheson (2000); Alexandridis (2004); Fejfer (2008). 15 Varner (1995) 187-206. 98256.indb 207 9/11/15 14:35 208 T.E. FRASER Orentzel (1979) make some reference to coinage, but unduly accept that Hanfmann’s “Flavian Beauty” was a portrait of the young Domitia.16 Burns (2007) briefly discusses Domitia’s portraiture on statues and coins, and provides some coin illustrations. This paper expands this area of inquiry drawing on the expertise of the art historians. Fittschen (1996) and Fejfer (2008) show that official portraits of empresses were commis- sioned by the imperial administration and were therefore under close imperial scrutiny. These portraits were mainly intended for public view- ing in conspicuous venues and specially commissioned models were sent out to the provinces for copying.17 The portraits were also used as models by die-cutters for the coins and by other sculptors18 and in this way were disseminated across the empire.19 For the religious life and policy of the Flavians Scott’s invaluable monograph (1936) shows Domitia’s rôle in the Flavian pantheon and Hahn (1994) reveals the association of this Augusta with a large number of deities on the statues and coins in the Greek East.20 SOURCES FOR DOMITIA LONGINA The main ancient literary sources for Domitia’s life can be found in the works of Cassius Dio and in Suetonius’ lives of Vespasian, Titus and Domitian.21 These are generally negative. Dio provides detail not found in Suetonius and his book on Domitian reflects his poor opinion of later contemporary emperors.22 In the case of Suetonius, scholars 16 McDermott & Orentzel (1979) 71-73, 75; this portrait is of an unknown woman with a Flavian hairstyle: Fittschen & Zanker (1983) Band 3, Taf.
Recommended publications
  • Women in Criminal Trials in the Julio-Claudian Era
    Women in Criminal Trials in the Julio-Claudian Era by Tracy Lynn Deline B.A., University of Saskatchewan, 1994 M.A., University of Saskatchewan, 2001 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Classics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) September 2009 © Tracy Lynn Deline, 2009 Abstract This study focuses on the intersection of three general areas: elite Roman women, criminal law, and Julio-Claudian politics. Chapter one provides background material on the literary and legal source material used in this study and considers the cases of Augustus’ daughter and granddaughter as a backdrop to the legal and political thinking that follows. The remainder of the dissertation is divided according to women’s roles in criminal trials. Chapter two, encompassing the largest body of evidence, addresses the role of women as defendants, and this chapter is split into three thematic parts that concentrate on charges of adultery, treason, and other crimes. A recurring question is whether the defendants were indicted for reasons specific to them or the indictments were meant to injure their male family members politically. Analysis of these cases reveals that most of the accused women suffered harm without the damage being shared by their male family members. Chapter three considers that a handful of powerful women also filled the role of prosecutor, a role technically denied to them under the law. Resourceful and powerful imperial women like Messalina and Agrippina found ways to use criminal accusations to remove political enemies. Chapter four investigates women in the role of witnesses in criminal trials.
    [Show full text]
  • Eclectic Antiquity Catalog
    Eclectic Antiquity the Classical Collection of the Snite Museum of Art Compiled and edited by Robin F. Rhodes Eclectic Antiquity the Classical Collection of the Snite Museum of Art Compiled and edited by Robin F. Rhodes © University of Notre Dame, 2010. All Rights Reserved ISBN 978-0-9753984-2-5 Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Geometric Horse Figurine ............................................................................................................. 5 Horse Bit with Sphinx Cheek Plates.............................................................................................. 11 Cup-skyphos with Women Harvesting Fruit.................................................................................. 17 Terracotta Lekythos....................................................................................................................... 23 Marble Lekythos Gravemarker Depicting “Leave Taking” ......................................................... 29 South Daunian Funnel Krater....................................................................................................... 35 Female Figurines.......................................................................................................................... 41 Hooded Male Portrait................................................................................................................... 47 Small Female Head......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vespasia Polla Vespasiani Family*
    Vespasia Polla Vespasiani Family* Titus Flavius Petronius Sabinus c45 BCE Centurion Reserve Army Vespasius Pollo of Pompeii, Tax Collector Reate Sabinia Italy-15 Rome [+] Tertulia Military Tribune ?-45 Tertuilius di Roma 32 BCE Lazio Italy -9AD Rome Nursia + ? = Titus Flavius I Sabinus Tax Collector + = Vespasia & Banker c20 BCE Rieti Lazio Italy-? Polla 19 BCE-? = Flavius = Titus Flavius Caesar Vespasianus Augustus 9 Falacrinae-79 Rieti, Italy Proconsul = Titus Flavius II Sabinus Consul of Rome c8-69 Vespasia c10 of Africa 53-69, Emperor of Rome 69-79 + 1. 38 AD Domitilla the Elder 2 Sabratha + 1. 63 AD Arrechina Clementina Arrechinus 1 BCE-c10BCE North Africa (present Libya)-66 Rome; +[2.] Antonia Caenis ?-74 = 3 children Tertulla c12-65; +2. Marcia Furnilla Petillius Rufus, Prefect of Rome c 18 AD + ? Caesia = 1. Titus Flavius Caesar = 1. Titus Flavius Caesar Domitianus Augustus = 1. Flavia = Quintus Petillius Cerialis Vespasianus Augustus 39 51-96 Rome Emperor of Rome 81-96 + 1. 70 Domitilla the Caesius Rufus Caesii Senator Rome-81 Rieti Emperor of Domitia Longina; [+] 2. Julia Flavia 64-91 Rome Younger 45- of Rome, Governor of Britain Rome 79-81 +1. Marcia 66 Rome +60 30 Ombrie Italy-83 Furnilla+ 2. Arrecina Tertulla Cassius Labienus Posthumus = 1. Titus Flavius [PII265-270] + ? = + =Flavia Saint + = Titus Flavius III Caesar 73-82 Rome = 1. Julia Flavia 64-91 Domitilla ?-95< Clemens Sabinus 50-95 Rome = Marcus Postumia Festus de Afranius Hannibalianus Rome, Consul Suffect de Rome ?- Afranii Prince of Syria c200- = Titus Flavius IV
    [Show full text]
  • Suetonius the Life of Titus Translated by Alexander
    SUETONIUS THE LIFE OF TITUS TRANSLATED BY ALEXANDER THOMSON, M.D. REVISED AND CORRECTED BY T. FORESTER, ESQ., A.M. VITA DIVI TITI (465) I. Titus, who had the same cognomen with his father, was the darling and delight of mankind; so much did the natural genius, address, or good fortune he possessed tend to conciliate the favour of all. This was, indeed, extremely difficult, after he became emperor, as before that time, and even during the reign of his father, he lay under public odium and censure. He was born upon the third of the calends of January, [30th Dec.] in the year remarkable for the death of Caius [776], near the Septizonium [777], in a mean house, and a very small and dark room, which still exists, and is shown to the curious. II. He was educated in the palace with Britannicus, and instructed in the same branches of learning, and under the same masters. During this time, they say, that a physiognomist being introduced by Narcissus, the freedman of Claudius, to examine the features of Britannicus [778], positively affirmed that he would never become emperor, but that Titus, who stood by, would. They were so familiar, that Titus being next him at table, is thought to have tasted of the fatal potion which put an end to Britannicus's life, and to have contracted from it a distemper which hung about him a long time. In remembrance of all these circumstances, he afterwards erected a golden statue of him in the Palatium, and dedicated to him an equestrian statue of ivory; attending it in the Circensian procession, in which it is still carried to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lives of the Saints
    Itl 1 i ill 11 11 i 11 i I 'M^iii' I III! II lr|i^ P !| ilP i'l ill ,;''ljjJ!j|i|i !iF^"'""'""'!!!|| i! illlll!lii!liiy^ iiiiiiiiiiHi '^'''liiiiiiiiilii ;ili! liliiillliili ii- :^ I mmm(i. MwMwk: llliil! ""'''"'"'''^'iiiiHiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiii !lj!il!|iilil!i|!i!ll]!; 111 !|!|i!l';;ii! ii!iiiiiiiiiiilllj|||i|jljjjijl I ili!i||liliii!i!il;.ii: i'll III ''''''llllllllilll III "'""llllllll!!lll!lllii!i I i i ,,„, ill 111 ! !!ii! : III iiii CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY l,wj Cornell Unrversity Library BR 1710.B25 1898 V.5 Lives ot the saints. Ili'lll I 3' 1924 026 082 572 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924026082572 THE ilibes? of tlje t)atnt0 REV. S. BARING-GOULD SIXTEEN VOLUMES VOLUME THE FIFTH THE ILities of tlje g)amt6 BY THE REV. S. BARING-GOULD, M.A. New Edition in i6 Volumes Revised with Introduction and Additional Lives of English Martyrs, Cornish and Welsh Saints, and a full Index to the Entire Work ILLUSTRATED BY OVER 400 ENGRAVINGS VOLUME THE FIFTH LONDON JOHN C. NFMMO &-• NEW YORK . LONGMANS, GREEN. CO. MDCCCXCVIll / , >1< ^-Hi-^^'^ -^ / :S'^6 <d -^ ^' Printed by Ballantyne, Hanson &> CO. At the Ballantyne Press *- -»5< im CONTENTS PAGE Bernardine . 309 SS. Achilles and comp. 158 Boniface of Tarsus . 191 B. Alcuin 263 Boniface IV., Pope . 345 S. Aldhelm .... 346 Brendan of Clonfert 217 „ Alexander I., Pope .
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • A Handbook of Greek and Roman Coins
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE Cornell University Library CJ 237.H64 A handbook of Greek and Roman coins. 3 1924 021 438 399 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924021438399 f^antilioofcs of glrcfjaeologj) anU Antiquities A HANDBOOK OF GREEK AND ROMAN COINS A HANDBOOK OF GREEK AND ROMAN COINS G. F. HILL, M.A. OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COINS AND MEDALS IN' THE bRITISH MUSEUM WITH FIFTEEN COLLOTYPE PLATES Hon&on MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY l8 99 \_All rights reserved'] ©jcforb HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY PREFACE The attempt has often been made to condense into a small volume all that is necessary for a beginner in numismatics or a young collector of coins. But success has been less frequent, because the knowledge of coins is essentially a knowledge of details, and small treatises are apt to be un- readable when they contain too many references to particular coins, and unprofltably vague when such references are avoided. I cannot hope that I have passed safely between these two dangers ; indeed, my desire has been to avoid the second at all risk of encountering the former. At the same time it may be said that this book is not meant for the collector who desires only to identify the coins which he happens to possess, while caring little for the wider problems of history, art, mythology, and religion, to which coins sometimes furnish the only key.
    [Show full text]
  • Staging Morality: Studies in the Lex Iulia De Adulteriis of 18 BCE
    Staging Morality: Studies in the Lex Iulia de Adulteriis of 18 BCE by Mary Alana Deminion B.A., University of Victoria, 2007 B.A., University of Ottawa, 2001 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Greek and Roman Studies Mary Alana Deminion University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Staging Morality: Studies in the Lex Iulia de Adulteriis of 18 BCE by Mary Alana Deminion B.A., University of Victoria, 2007 B.A., University of Ottawa, 2001 Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, Supervisor (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) Dr. Cedric A. J. Littlewood, Departmental Member (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Gregory D. Rowe, Supervisor (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) Dr. Cedric A. J. Littlewood, Departmental Member (Department of Greek and Roman Studies) The lex Iulia de adulteriis of 18 BCE, which for the first time made adultery a criminal offence and created a standing court, was touted by the Augustan regime as a return to the moral customs of the Republican past. However, the new reform in fact represented a significant shift away from the traditional authority of the Roman paterfamilias to punish transgressions privately at his discretion and towards the legal power of the emperor and Senate to define and regulate morality on a public scale. Using a variety of primary source evidence, I explore the provisions of the adultery law and place the resulting criminal trials within the context of public staging of the Roman aristocracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alleged Persecution of the Roman Christians by the Emperor Domitian
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 1-1-2005 The alleged persecution of the Roman Christians by the emperor Domitian Ken Laffer Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Laffer, K. (2005). The alleged persecution of the Roman Christians by the emperor Domitian. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/639 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/639 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Courts have the power to impose a wide range of civil and criminal sanctions for infringement of copyright, infringement of moral rights and other offences under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Portraits Flaviens Dans Les Collections Du Musée Du Louvre Et Du Cabinet Des Médailles Marie Pierre Delanos
    Les portraits flaviens dans les collections du Musée du Louvre et du Cabinet des Médailles Marie Pierre Delanos To cite this version: Marie Pierre Delanos. Les portraits flaviens dans les collections du Musée du Louvre et du Cabinet des Médailles . Art et histoire de l’art. 2014. dumas-01546143 HAL Id: dumas-01546143 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01546143 Submitted on 23 Jun 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License ÉCOLE DU LOUVRE Marie Pierre DELANOS Les portraits flaviens dans les collections du Musée du Louvre et du Cabinet des Médailles Mémoire de recherche e e (2 année de 2 cycle) en histoire de l'art appliquée aux collections présenté sous la direction me de M Cécile COLONNA Septembre 2014 Le contenu de ce mémoire est publié sous la licence Creative Commons 1 CC BY NC ND 2 Table des matières Table des matières ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Here an Attempt Was Made to Analyse the Nexus of Familial, Amical and Patronal Ties Wherein Domitius Corbulo Flourished
    DOMITIUS CORBULO AND THE SENATORIAL OPPOSITION TO THE REIGN OF NERO* I. INTRODUCTION Domitius Corbulo enjoyed trust and considerable favour with Gaius and Claudius. In AD 39, he became consul suffectus, no doubt as a conse- quence of his well-attested connections to the domus Augusta and prob- ably as a token of imperial gratitude for the financial profits Gaius made out of the prosecutions of the highway commissioners that Corbulo’s ran- corous (and homonymous) father had pursued ever since the rule of Tiberius. Although in 43, Claudius forced Corbulo Maior to repay a part of the fines to his victims, the star of Corbulo the Younger continued to rise. In 47, he achieved military repute as legatus Augusti pro praetore exercitus Germaniae inferioris, receiving the ornamenta triumphalia for his ruthless campaign against several Germanic tribes. Around AD 52, Corbulo got the prestigious proconsulate of Asia. That Nero also had complete confidence in Corbulo up to and including the eventful year of AD 65, is irrefutable1. In 63, the emperor commanded all legati Augusti pro praetore serving in the Eastern imperial provinces to obey the military orders of Corbulo, whose imperium pro praetore was * This paper may be construed as the complement of A Note on Syme’s Chronology of Vistilia’s Children, AncSoc 30 (2000), p. 95-113, where an attempt was made to analyse the nexus of familial, amical and patronal ties wherein Domitius Corbulo flourished. The results of this analysis may help to explain Corbulo’s unusually successful political and military career. I sincerely wish to thank Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • FLAVIA DOMITILLA AS DELICATA: a NEW INTERPRETATION of SUETONIUS, VESP. 3* in This Way Suetonius Informs Us About Flavia Domitill
    FLAVIA DOMITILLA AS DELICATA: A NEW INTERPRETATION OF SUETONIUS, VESP. 3* Abstract: This paper proposes a new interpretation of the passage in Suetonius’ Life of Vespasian (Suet., Vesp. 3). The ancient historian, talking about Flavia Domitilla, the wife of Vespasian and the mother of Titus and Domitian, defines her as delicata of Statilius Capella, the Roman knight from Sabratha. Until now, scholars have thought that the relationship between Flavia Domitilla and Statilius Capella was sexual in nature, on the basis of the literary sources concerning the adjective delicatus/a and its meaning. Thanks to the epigraphic evidence about the delicati, not yet analyzed in reference to this pas- sage, it is possible to reach to new conclusions about Flavia Domitil- la’s status. The paper reviews her relationship with Statilius Capella, the sentence of the recuperatores who declared her ingenua and consequently Roman citizen (and not vice versa), and the role played in this trial by Flavius Liberalis. Inter haec Flaviam Domitillam duxit uxorem, Statili Capellae equitis R(omani) Sabratensis ex Africa delicatam olim Latinaeque condi- cionis, sed mox ingenuam et civem Rom(anam) reciperatorio iudicio pronuntiatam, patre asserente Flavio Liberale Ferenti genito nec quic- quam amplius quam quaestorio scriba. Ex hac liberos tulit Titum et Domitianum et Domitillam. Uxori ac filiae superstes fuit atque utramque adhuc privatus1. In this way Suetonius informs us about Flavia Domitilla2, the wife of Vespasian and the mother of Titus and Domitian. This evidence of Suetonius is of particular importance because it constitutes the only information about her. In fact, apart from the Epitome de Caesaribus, where we find a brief reference to Flavia Domitilla, Suetonius represents the only known source about her life.
    [Show full text]