CLEMENT of ROME and DOMITIAN's EMPIRE 7He .Fo!
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CHAPTER FOUR CLEMENT OF ROME AND DOMITIAN'S EMPIRE 7he .fo!filment qf the imperial peace in Clement's community Clement's Corinthians has been convincingly dated as contemporary with Domitian's reign (A.D. 81-96), and more specifically between A.D. 94 and 97 during which the "sudden and repeated misfortunes (ta~ ai<pvt3iou~ mt E7taA.AfJA.ou~ y£vO!lEVa~ lJ!ltV ow<popa~) and calami ties (Kat 7t€pt7ttroon~)" occurred that had delayed the sending of the letter (Cor. l, 1). 1 Christian writers from Hegesippus and Melito of Sardis onwards claimed that Domitian persecuted Christianity, so that it would be reasonable to conclude that Clement's words here refer to that reign and such a persecution. 2 Furthermore, as Irenaeus (Adv. Haer. V, 30,3) connects the Apocalypse with the reign of Domitian, it would follow that this work is a reaction to that persecution. As that persecution can also be seen as part of the plan of Domitian, as the new Augustus, to reconstruct the Imperial Cult, the developing theology of these two chronologically contemporary works can be related to the developing theology of the Imperial Cult. Since however it has been denied that Domitian persecuted Chris tianity and particularly influenced the Imperial Cult itself, we will begin by discussing the question of Domitian's persecution (section A) as a background to an analysis of the contra-cultural ideology of Order as it appears in Clement's Corinthians (section B). We shall reserve for Chapter 5 our further discussion of Domitian's reform of the cult and the reflection of that reform in the Apocalypse. In Chap- 1 L.W. Barnard, Clement of Rome and the Persecution of Domitian, in NTS 10 (1963--64), pp. 251-260; Idem. St. Clement of Rome and the Persecution ofDomitian, in Studies in the Apostolic Fathers and their Background, (Oxford: Blackwell 1966), pp. 5-18. See also P. Keresztes, The Jews, the Christians, and the Emperor Domitian, in VChr 27 (1973), pp. 1-28. 2 Hegesippus (Eusebius H.E. III,20); Melito of Sardis, Apology (Eusebius H.E. IV,26); Tertullian, Apol. 5; De Pall. 2; Lactantius, De Mort. Pers. 3; Eusebius, Chronicon. II, p. 160;Jerome, Ep. 108,7; Chronicon Ann. Abr. 2112, Domit.l6; Theodoret, Graec. A.ffict. Cur. 9; Joannes Malalas, Chronograph. 10 etc. CLEMENT OF ROME AND DOMITIAN'S EMPIRE 141 ter 6 we shall argue that the subsequent development of Church Order a generation later in Ignatius of Antioch was historically in fluenced by both Domitian's cultic reforms and by the Apoca!Jpse itself. PART A. DoMITIAN AND THE WRITING oF CLEMENT's CoRINTHIANS Attempts to deny Domitian's persecution-that would break the links between both Clement's Corinthians and the Apoca!Jpse, and the cui tic reforms upon which my argument relies-rest upon three pre misses, namely: 1. The absence of any mention in pagan sources that Domitian per secuted the Christians, 2. The ambiguity of archaeological evidence for Eusebius' indentification of Flavius Clemens, Flavia Domitilla, and Acilius Glabrio as Christian and not Jewish martyrs, and 3. The absence of pagan evidence for persecution under Domitian and thus for martyrdom of Christians with these names. Let us now, in our first section, examine each of these assumptions in turn. 4A l. Pagan evidence: Dio Cassius 67, 14,1-3 Suetonius (Domitian. 15,1 7) and Quintillian (Inst. Drat. 4, proem.) had mentioned the names of Flavia Domitilla, Flavius Clemens, and Acilius Glabrio, but not the charges against them. However, Dio Cassius (LXVII, 14, 1-2) claims that Flavius Clemens the consul (una.tEuovnx), and his wife the emperor's kinswoman (auyy£vf1) Flavia Domitilla were charged both with a8£6tT]c; and with "turning away to Jewish cus toms (£c; ta t&v 'Iouoa.irov i1811 £~01c£A.A.ovtEc;)." In consequence Flavius was executed and Domitilla was exiled to Pandateria. Acilius Glabrio, who had held consular office along with the young Trajan (tov ~-LEta tou Tpa.i:a.vou ap~a.vta.), was also condemned. But Dio also mentions ( 14 ,3) that this was more than a trial of the individuals mentioned and that on the same charges "many ... others (aA.A.ot ... noA.A.oi) were condemned (Ka.t£0tl((Xa8T]aa.v), some who died (Kat Ot !lEv anESa.vov) and others who were deprived of their property (oi 8£ t&v youv oumoov £at£prt8TJaa.v)." There was therefore a quite general movement against ta -r&v 'Iouoairov i18TJ. .