Environmental Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Assessment FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WINNEMUCCA FIELD OFFICE OIL AND GAS LEASING OCTOBER 21, 2005 EA NUMBER: NV-020-05-EA-21 Lead Agency: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Winnemucca Field Office 5100 E. Winnemucca Blvd. Winnemucca, Nevada 89445 Bureau of Land Management Oil and Gas Resources Leasing Winnemucca Field Office Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................. i TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... vii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................... ix 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED OF THE PROPOSED ACTION............................................ 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION .................................................................................1-1 1.3 LAND USE CONFORMANCE STATEMENT ...............................................................................1-3 1.4 RELATIONSHIP TO LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND OTHER PLANS................................................1-4 1.5 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS AND DOCUMENTS..............................................................1-5 1.6 HISTORY OF OIL AND GAS LEASING AND EXPLORATION IN THE WINNEMUCCA FIELD OFFICE ......................................................................................1-4 1.7 PURPOSE AND NEED...............................................................................................................1-6 1.7.1 Purpose for the Proposed Action ................................................................................1-6 1.7.2 Need for the Proposed Action....................................................................................1-7 1.8 ISSUES ...................................................................................................................................1-8 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ...................... 2-1 2.1 PROPOSED ACTION................................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Reasonably Foreseeable Development Scenarios .....................................................2-1 2.2 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION..........................................................................2-6 2.2.1 No Action Alternative ...............................................................................................2-6 2.2.2 Alternative Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis...............................2-6 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT...................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 AIR QUALITY ............................................................................................................................3-3 3.1.1 Regional Setting........................................................................................................3-3 3.1.1 Meteorology and Air Quality ....................................................................................3-5 3.2 CULTURAL RESOURCES ..........................................................................................................3-11 3.2.1 Cultural History.......................................................................................................3-11 3.2.1 Cultural Resources Sensitivity ...............................................................................3-18 3.3 INVASIVE, NONNATIVE SPECIES .............................................................................................3-22 3.4 MIGRATORY BIRDS .................................................................................................................3-24 3.5 NATIVE AMERICAN RELIGIOUS CONCERNS ...........................................................................3-24 3.6 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES ...............................................3-27 3.7 WASTES, HAZARDOUS OR SOLID ...........................................................................................3-31 3.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ......................................................................................3-32 3.8.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................3-32 3.8.2 Surface Water Resources .........................................................................................3-34 3.8.3 Groundwater Resources ...........................................................................................3-37 3.8.4 Water Quality...........................................................................................................3-41 Table of Contents i Oil and Gas Resources Leasing Bureau of Land Management Programmatic Environmental Assessment Winnemucca Field Office 3.9 WETLANDS AND RIPARIAN ZONES .........................................................................................3-43 3.10 WILDERNESS, AND WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS..................................................................3-44 3.10.1 Management Prescriptions......................................................................................3-45 3.10.2 Wilderness Study Areas .........................................................................................3-46 3.10.3 Wilderness ..................................................................................................3-46 3.10.4 National Conservation Area....................................................................................3-46 3.11 SOILS ..................................................................................................................................3-47 3.11.1 General Soils Found in the Region.........................................................................3-48 3.11.2 Erosion Hazard for Soils ........................................................................................3-48 3.11.3 Soil Erosion by Water ............................................................................................3-49 3.11.4 Soil Erosion by Wind .............................................................................................3-49 3.11.5 Soil Erosion Related to Landform Type.................................................................3-50 3.12 VEGETATION .........................................................................................................................3-50 3.12.1 Zonal Plant Communities.......................................................................................3-54 3.12.2 Azonal Communities..............................................................................................3-56 3.13 WILDLIFE ............................................................................................................................3-58 3.13.1 Wildlife .............................................................................................................3-58 3.13.2 Other Biota .............................................................................................................3-59 3.14 FISHERIES ...........................................................................................................................3-60 3.15 GEOLOGY AND MINERALS ....................................................................................................3-60 3.15.1 Geology .............................................................................................................3-61 3.15.2 Oil and Gas Resources ............................................................................................3-61 3.15.3 Mineral Resources...................................................................................................3-63 3.15.4 Geothermal Resources.............................................................................................3-65 3.16 PALEONTOLOGY....................................................................................................................3-68 3.17 LANDS AND REALTY .............................................................................................................3-71 3.17.1 Land Uses and Ownership ......................................................................................3-72 3.17.2 Land Tenure Acquisition and Disposal...................................................................3-73 3.18 RECREATION .........................................................................................................................3-73 3.18.1 Background .............................................................................................................3-74 3.18.2 Highlights .............................................................................................................3-74 3.19 VISUAL RESOURCES...............................................................................................................3-75 3.19.1 Visual Resource Management.................................................................................3-76 3.19.2 Description of the Assessment Area .......................................................................3-77 3.20 WILD HORSES AND BURROS.................................................................................................3-78 3.21 RANGE RESOURCES...............................................................................................................3-79
Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Burning Man Geology Black Rock Desert.Pdf
    GEOLOGY OF THE BLACK ROCK DESERT By Cathy Busby Professor of Geology University of California Santa Barbara http://www.geol.ucsb.edu/faculty/busby BURNING MAN EARTH GUARDIANS PAVILION 2012 LEAVE NO TRACE Please come find me and Iʼll give you a personal tour of the posters! You are here! In one of the most amazing geologic wonderlands in the world! Fantastic rock exposure, spectacular geomorphic features, and a long history, including: 1. PreCambrian loss of our Australian neighbors by continental rifting, * 2. Paleozoic accretion of island volcanic chains like Japan (twice!), 3. Mesozoic compression and emplacement of a batholith, 4. Cenozoic stretching and volcanism, plus a mantle plume torching the base of the continent! Let’s start with what you can see on the playa and from the playa: the Neogene to Recent geology, which is the past ~23 million years (= Ma). Note: Recent = past 15,000 years http://www.terragalleria.com Then we’ll “build” the terrane you are standing on, beginning with a BILLION years ago, moving through the Paleozoic (old life, ~540-253 Ma), Mesozoic (age of dinosaurs, ~253-65 Ma)) and Cenozoic (age of mammals, ~65 -0 Ma). Neogene to Recent geology Black Rock Playa extends 100 miles, from Gerlach to the Jackson Mountains. The Black Rock Desert is divided into two arms by the Black Rock Range, and covers 1,000 square miles. Empire (south of Gerlach)has the U.S. Gypsum mine and drywall factory (brand name “Sheetrock”), and thereʼs an opal mine at base of Calico Mtns. Neogene to Recent geology BRP = The largest playa in North America “Playa” = a flat-bottomed depression, usually a dry lake bed 3,500ʼ asl in SW, 4,000ʼ asl in N Land speed record: 1997 - supersonic car, 766 MPH Runoff mainly from the Quinn River, which heads in Oregon ~150 miles north.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary International Colonisation and Early Peopling of The
    Quaternary International xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint Colonisation and early peopling of the Colombian Amazon during the Late Pleistocene and the Early Holocene: New evidence from La Serranía La Lindosa ∗ Gaspar Morcote-Ríosa, Francisco Javier Aceitunob, , José Iriartec, Mark Robinsonc, Jeison L. Chaparro-Cárdenasa a Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia b Departamento de Antropología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia c Department of Archaeology, Exeter, University of Exeter, United Kingdom ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Recent research carried out in the Serranía La Lindosa (Department of Guaviare) provides archaeological evi- Colombian amazon dence of the colonisation of the northwest Colombian Amazon during the Late Pleistocene. Preliminary ex- Serranía La Lindosa cavations were conducted at Cerro Azul, Limoncillos and Cerro Montoya archaeological sites in Guaviare Early peopling Department, Colombia. Contemporary dates at the three separate rock shelters establish initial colonisation of Foragers the region between ~12,600 and ~11,800 cal BP. The contexts also yielded thousands of remains of fauna, flora, Human adaptability lithic artefacts and mineral pigments, associated with extensive and spectacular rock pictographs that adorn the Rock art rock shelter walls. This article presents the first data from the region, dating the timing of colonisation, de- scribing subsistence strategies, and examines human adaptation to these transitioning landscapes. The results increase our understanding of the global expansion of human populations, enabling assessment of key inter- actions between people and the environment that appear to have lasting repercussions for one of the most important and biologically diverse ecosystems in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Riders- Thomas Flynn, B. Riley) (Kansas St. Hist. Soc.
    99. Camp Floyd: Hutchings' California Magazine July 1860 . (riders - Thomas Flynn, B. Riley) (Kansas St. Hist. Soc.) ( General Road Agent: W.W. Finney) (agents: Hamilton, Ruffin) (stations: St. Joseph, Kennekuk, 3rd Station, Marysville, 5th Station, Little Blue, Up Little Blue, Ft. Kearney, Plum Creek, Cottonwood, Crossing South Platte, Ash Hollow, Rush Creek, Larence Fork, Chimney Rock, Scott's Bluff, Horse Creek, Ft. Laramie, Horse-Shoe Creek, Deer Creek, Platte Bridge, 1st Crossing Sweetwater, 3rd Crossing Sweetwater, Last Crossing Sweetwater, South Pass, Dry Sandy, Little Sandy, Big Sandy, Green River, Ham's Fork, Miller's Fork, Ft. Bridger, Bear River, Weber River/mouth of Echo Canyon, Salt Lake City, Hot Springs, Camp Floyd, Rush Valley, Simpson's Springs, Dug Way (Well) Desert, Fish Springs, Pleasant Valley, Schell Creek, Thousand Spring valley, Ruby Valley, Two Springs, Next Station, Willow Creek, Antelope Creek, Mouth of Canyon, Cold Springs, Reese's River, Willow Creek, Sink of Carson River, Walker's River, Up Walker's River, Carson River, Miller ' s Station, Carson River, Miller's Station, Carson City, Placerville, Sacramento City, San Francisco) [SJM] U.S. Senate, Exec. Doc. 46th Congress, 3rd session, I, No 21 p. 7-8 "Contract with Overland Mail Co, 11 & "Route 10773 " (stations: St. Joseph, Troy, Lewis, Kinnekuk, Goteschall, Log Chain, Seneca, Gautard's, Marysville, Cottonwood, Rock House, Rock Creek/Lodi P.O., Virginia City, Big Sandy, Milllersville, Kiowa Station, Liberty Farm, Thirty-two Mile Creek, Sand Hill, Kearney Station, Fort Kearney, Platt's Station, Garden, Plum Creek, Willow Island, Midway, Gilman's, Cottonwood Springs, Cold Springs, Fremont Springs, Dansey's Station, Gills, Diamond Springs, Frontz Station, Julesburg, Nine Mile Station, Pole Creek No.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Potential Report
    FRTC Modernization EIS Supporting Study Mineral Potential Report This Page Intentionally Left Blank REPORT Mineral Potential Report for the Fallon Range Training Complex Modernization for ManTech International Corporation Submitted to: ManTech International Corporation 420 Stevens Avenue, Suite 300 Solana Beach, California 92075 Submitted by: Golder Associates Inc. +1 520 888-8818 18108941 November 2018 November 2018 18108941 Executive Summary This Mineral Potential Report (MPR) has been prepared to support an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the land withdrawal extension and expansion at the Naval Air Station (NAS) Fallon Range Training Complex (FRTC), in Churchill, Lyon, Mineral, Nye, and Pershing Counties, Nevada. This MPR is intended to be used as a planning tool that provides land managers with mineral resource information to develop management plans. The FRTC is part of the US Department of Navy (DON). The FRTC currently encompasses an area of 223,562 acres (ac). Figure ES.1 presents the areas involved. The FRTC consists of federal land that has been withdrawn from public use and reserved for military training and operations through the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999, Public Law 106-65 (MLWA). The current withdrawal will expire in November 2021, unless Congress enacts legislation providing an extension. Withdrawal of additional lands to support DON activities in ranges B-16, B-17, B-20, and the DVTA may impact public and private lands including mining and geothermal leases, as well as access to mineral exploration and production infrastructure such as roads, pipelines, and temporary and fixed facilities. As part of the EIS process, the DON proposed three action alternatives for the land withdrawal extension and expansion for the FRTC.
    [Show full text]
  • Sturtz Unr 0139M 13151.Pdf
    University of Nevada, Reno A Natural and Cultural History of Leonard Rockshelter, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology By Sara N. Sturtz Dr. Geoffrey Smith/Thesis Advisor May, 2020 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by entitled be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Advisor Committee Member Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean Graduate School i ABSTRACT Leonard Rockshelter (LRS) is located in Pershing County, Nevada. Robert Heizer excavated the site in 1950 and reported more than 2 m of stratified deposits from which he recovered a modest assemblage of perishable and lithic artifacts. Of interest to the University of Nevada Reno’s Great Basin Paleoindian Research Unit (GBPRU) was Heizer’s discovery of obsidian flakes in deposits dated to 11,199±570 14C BP (14,900- 11,610 cal BP). This possibility of a stratified Pleistocene occupation prompted the GBPRU to return to LRS in 2018 and 2019 for additional work, which produced few artifacts but a sizeable small mammal assemblage. In this thesis, I test two hypotheses: (1) the small mammal assemblage provides a paleoenvironmental record that demonstrates changing local conditions during the Terminal Pleistocene and Holocene; and (2) the shelter contains evidence of human occupation dating to the Terminal Pleistocene. My results demonstrate that the Early Holocene and initial Middle Holocene were more mesic than later periods. They also suggest that people did not occupy LRS until the Early Holocene, after which time they periodically returned to the site.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of NEVADA-RENO Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Un~Vrrsiryof Nevada-8.Eno Reno, Nevada 89557-0088 (702) 784-6691 FAX: (7G2j 784-1709
    UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-RENO Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Un~vrrsiryof Nevada-8.eno Reno, Nevada 89557-0088 (702) 784-6691 FAX: (7G2j 784-1709 NBMG OPEN-FILE REPORT 90-1 MINERAL RESOURCE INVENTORY BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, CARSON CITY DISTRICT, NEVADA Joseph V. Tingley This information should be considered preliminary. It has not been edited or checked for completeness or accuracy. Mineral Resource Inventory Bureau of Land Management, Carson City District, Nevada Prepared by: Joseph V. Tingley Prepared for: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF E INTERIOR '\\ !\ BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Carson City Office Carson City, Nevada Under Cooperative Agreement 14-08-0001-A-0586 with the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NEVADA BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO January 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................ 3 LOCATION .......................... 4 MINERAL RESOURCES ...................... 4 MINING DISTRICTS AND AREAS .................. 6 ALLEN HOT SPRINGS AREA ................. 6 ALPINE DISTRICT .................... 7 AURORA DISTRICT .................... 10 BELL DISTRICT ..................... 13 BELLMOUNTAIN DISTRICT ................. 16 BENWAY DISTRICT .................... 19 BERNICE DISTRICT .................... 21 BOVARDDISTRICT .............23 BROKENHILLS DISTRICT ................. 27 BRUNERDISTRICT .................. 30 BUCKLEYDISTRICT ................. 32 BUCKSKINDISTRICT ............... 35 CALICO HILLS AREA ................... 39 CANDELARIA DISTRICT ................. 41 CARSON CITY DISTRICT .................. 44
    [Show full text]
  • CAVE NOTES a Review of Cave and Karst Research
    CAVE NOTES A Review of Cave and Karst Research Volume 6, No.4 July/August. 1964 IlPIPEIl ARTIFACTS FROM SIERRA NEVADA MORTUARY CAVES by Louis A. Payen' Although burial caves of the central Sierra Nevada of California have been reported since the Gold Rush (Wallace, 19S1a), very little is known about the nature of the culture of the people who placed their dead in these natural tombs. There have been many explanations for human remains found in such caves: these range from their use as prisons (Stanford Grotto, 1951) to their being sites of accidental deaths (Orr, 1952). Chronological placement of these bone deposits is uncertain; estimates range from more than 12.000 years (Orr, 1952) to historic times (Sinclair, 1908; Stanford Grotto, 1951). Archaeological research recently being conducted at Pinnacle Point Cave in Tuolumne County, California. (Payen and Johnson, 1964) is providing infor- mation that may eventually lead to answers to these problems. This vertical limestone cavern has a descent of approximately 70 Ee et , with two primary areas of archaeological deposits designated "upper cave" and "Iowe r cave". Exploratory excavations have revealed fill containing loose angular rocks, numerous s c atteved human bones, cremations, and artifacts. The artifact assemblage thus far recovered includes numerous green-backed abalone shell ornaments (Haliotis cracherodii), Q.livella shell beads of Middle Horizon types, cordage, basketry, bone obj ec ts and obsidian projectile points. Along with these items were recovered six small polished stone "pipee" that have a distinctive form, material, and context. It is these artifacts that are considered here. In all examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Located in the "Sinks"R Or Catchment Basins of the Carson, Walker, Truckee, and Humboldt Rivers (Fig
    PART IV: THE LACUSTRINE SUBSISTENCE PATTERN IN THE DESERT WEST Lewis K. Napton University of California, Berkeley Archaeological investigation of prehistoric occupation sites located in the Great Basin region of the western United States has dis- closed a long and remarkably detailed record of cultural adaptation in surroundings that have been characterized as one of the New World's harshest environments. The ttrestrictive" aspects of the Great Basin environment have been stressed to such an extent that one has the impression that the entire region was a bone-dry desert occupied only by small groups of Indians who managed to eke out a precarious living by subsisting on an occasional antelope, deer, or mountain sheep, the seeds of various plants, or unpalatable foods such as locusts, ants, gophers, snakes and crickets obtained from the desert biome. This '"marginal" sub- sistence adaptation was the economic basis of a lifeway that seems to have been shared by many inhabitants of the Great Basin (Steward 1938), but it is apparent that the desert-adapted existence has considerable time-depth in the region, for archaeological evidence found in sites such as Danger Cave, in western Utah, conforms to the putative Great Basin economic pattern--a ceaseless struggle to survive in an extremely arid habitat that has apparently remained almost unchanged during the last ten thousand years. A rather different impression of life in the Great Basin may be obtained, however, from study of archaeological sites located in the western part of the basin. Sites excavated or investigated during the last half-century in the Humboldt and Carson Sinks in west-central Nevada give evidence of a regional subsistence pattern that was structured primarily on utilization of the resources found in and near the lakes and marshes located in the "sinks"r or catchment basins of the Carson, Walker, Truckee, and Humboldt Rivers (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Holocene Paleohydrology of Walker Lake and the Carson Sink in the Western Great Basin, Nevada, USA
    Quaternary Research Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2019. doi:10.1017/qua.2018.151 Late Holocene paleohydrology of Walker Lake and the Carson Sink in the western Great Basin, Nevada, USA Kenneth D. Adamsa*, Edward J. Rhodesb aDivision of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, Nevada 89512, USA bDepartment of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom *Corresponding author e-mail address: [email protected] (RECEIVED June 8, 2018; ACCEPTED December 6, 2018) Abstract The late Holocene histories of Walker Lake and the Carson Sink were reconstructed by synthesizing existing data in both basins along with new age constraints from key sites, supplemented with paleohydrologic modeling. The repeated diversions of the Walker River to the Carson Sink and then back to Walker Lake caused Walker Lake–level fluctuations spanning ± 50 m. Low lake levels at about 1000, 750, and 300 cal yr BP are time correlative to the ages of fluvial deposits along the Walker River paleochannel, when flow was directed toward the Carson Sink. The timing and duration of large lakes in the Carson Sink were further refined using moisture-sensitive tree-ring chronologies. The largest lakes required a fourfold to fivefold increase in discharge spanning decades. Addition of Walker River flow to the Carson Sink by itself is inadequate to account for the required discharge. Instead, increases in the runoff coefficient and larger areas of the drainage basin contributing surface runoff may explain the enhanced discharge required to create these large lakes. Keywords: Carson Sink; Holocene; Lake Lahontan; Paleohydrologic modeling; Walker Lake INTRODUCTION of the Walker River, which periodically switched course from one terminal basin to the other (Russell, 1885; Benson and Paleohydrologic records from Great Basin pluvial lakes pro- Thompson, 1987a, 1987b; Benson et al., 1991; King, 1993, vide a rich source of information enhancing understanding of 1996; Adams, 2003, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Colonisation and Early Peopling of the Colombian Amazon During The
    Quaternary International xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint Colonisation and early peopling of the Colombian Amazon during the Late Pleistocene and the Early Holocene: New evidence from La Serranía La Lindosa ∗ Gaspar Morcote-Ríosa, Francisco Javier Aceitunob, , José Iriartec, Mark Robinsonc, Jeison L. Chaparro-Cárdenasa a Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia b Departamento de Antropología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia c Department of Archaeology, Exeter, University of Exeter, United Kingdom ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Recent research carried out in the Serranía La Lindosa (Department of Guaviare) provides archaeological evi- Colombian amazon dence of the colonisation of the northwest Colombian Amazon during the Late Pleistocene. Preliminary ex- Serranía La Lindosa cavations were conducted at Cerro Azul, Limoncillos and Cerro Montoya archaeological sites in Guaviare Early peopling Department, Colombia. Contemporary dates at the three separate rock shelters establish initial colonisation of Foragers the region between ~12,600 and ~11,800 cal BP. The contexts also yielded thousands of remains of fauna, flora, Human adaptability lithic artefacts and mineral pigments, associated with extensive and spectacular rock pictographs that adorn the Rock art rock shelter walls. This article presents the first data from the region, dating the timing of colonisation, de- scribing subsistence strategies, and examines human adaptation to these transitioning landscapes. The results increase our understanding of the global expansion of human populations, enabling assessment of key inter- actions between people and the environment that appear to have lasting repercussions for one of the most important and biologically diverse ecosystems in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Curren T Anthropology
    Forthcoming Current Anthropology Wenner-Gren Symposium Curren Supplementary Issues (in order of appearance) t VOLUME 54 SUPPLEMENT 8 DECEMBER 2013 Crisis, Value, and Hope: Rethinking the Economy. Susana Narotzky and Anthropolog Current Niko Besnier, eds. e Anthropology of Christianity: Unity, Diversity, New Directions. Joel Robbins and Naomi Haynes, eds. Anthropology Politics of the Urban Poor. Veena Das and Shalini Randeria, eds. y Previously Published Supplementary Issues THE WENNER-GREN SYMPOSIUM SERIES December 2013 Working Memory: Beyond Language and Symbolism. omas Wynn and ALTERNATIVE PATHWAYS TO COMPLEXITY: Frederick L. Coolidge, eds. EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES IN THE MIDDLE Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas. Setha M. Low and Sally PALEOLITHIC AND MIDDLE STONE AGE Engle Merry, eds. GUEST EDITORS: STEVEN L. KUHN AND ERELLA HOVERS Corporate Lives: New Perspectives on the Social Life of the Corporate Form. Damani Partridge, Marina Welker, and Rebecca Hardin, eds. Alternative Pathways to Complexity V e Origins of Agriculture: New Data, New Ideas. T. Douglas Price and olum Mediterranean and Red Sea Paleoclimate Ofer Bar-Yosef, eds. Neanderthal Demographic Estimates e 54 Agreements and Misunderstandings among Three Scientific Fields e Biological Anthropology of Living Human Populations: World Histories, National Styles, and International Networks. Susan Lindee Hominin Evolution in the Middle-Late Pleistocene and Ricardo Ventura Santos, eds. Variability in the Middle Stone Age of Eastern Africa Supplement Roots of the Middle Paleolithic in Eurasia Human Biology and the Origins of Homo. Susan Antón and Leslie C. Aiello, eds. Middle Stone Age Hunting Strategies and Diet Breadth Trends versus Conservatism in the Predatory Niche Potentiality and Humanness: Revisiting the Anthropological Object in Technological Trends in the Middle Stone Age of South Africa Contemporary Biomedicine.
    [Show full text]