UK Politics and Internet Memes an Analysis of Theresa May Memes Shared on Twitter During the 2017 General Election

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UK Politics and Internet Memes an Analysis of Theresa May Memes Shared on Twitter During the 2017 General Election Information School INF6000 Dissertation COVER SHEET (TURNITIN) Registration Number 160129287 Family Name Gruia First Name Mihaela Use of unfair means. It is the student's responsibility to ensure no aspect oF their work is plagiarised or the result oF other unfair means. The University’s and Information School’s advice on unfair means can be Found in your Student Handbook, available via http://www.sheFField.ac.uk/is/current. Assessment Word Count 14,995. If your dissertation has a word count that is outside the range 10,000 – 15,000 words or iF you do not state the word count then a deduction oF 3 marks will be applied Late suBmission. A dissertation submitted aFter 10am on the stated submission date will result in a deduction of 5% of the mark awarded For each working day after the submission date/time up to a maximum of 5 working days, where ‘working day’ includes Monday to Friday (excluding public holidays) and runs From 10am to 10am. A dissertation submitted aFter the maximum period will receive zero marks. Ethics documentation should Be included in the Appendix if your dissertation has Been judged to Be Low Risk or High Risk. ✓ (Please tick the box iF you have included the documentation) A deduction oF 3 marks will be applied For a dissertation iF the required ethics documentation is not included in the appendix; and the same deduction will be applied iF your research data has not been available For inspection when required. The deduction procedures are detailed in the INF6000 Module Outline and Dissertation Handbook. UK Politics and Internet Memes An Analysis of Theresa May Memes Shared on Twitter during the 2017 General Election A study submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MSc Data Science at THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD by MIHAELA GRUIA 4 September 2017 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS One spring afternoon, on the 23rd of March 2016, I met Dr Farida Vis in the Diamond Cafe. I was fascinated by her work and our conversation opened my mind to the prospect of completing the Data Science MSc in the Information School. It was a serendipitous encounter that helped kickstart a wonderful journey. Nearly 3 months later, on the 29th of June, I received a letter from Catherine McKeown from the UoS Finance Department that I had been awarded a Postgraduate Scholarship. Completing this course would have not been possible without that fortunate encounter, and without the scholarship. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. Although it often left me frustrated, tired, and confused, this dissertation has also tested my new ninja data science skills, and allowed me to use old knowledge that I gained in my Politics & IR BA. I can honestly say that this been my favourite project to work on in my entire academic career. Thank you Farida for the all the office hours and ‘walk-and-talks’ to the train station, as opportunities to reflect and refine my ideas. I have always admired you, your energy, your ability to multitask on top of multitasking, and coming out at the end of it being the superwoman that you are. The photos of Miss Finn have been the delight of my days when I needed that small push to keep coding. Thank you Peter for agreeing to be my second supervisor during the crucial last month of August and for reading my work and refining it in the process. Hannah and Chris, you are the best second coders any social media researcher could ever ask for, thanks for the attention to detail and patience to go through my spreadsheets and code frames. I owe you one so make sure you redeem it. Gemma, thanks for coming in for the ‘dissertation-work-sessions’, we may not have been the most productive, but we kept each other going and supported one another. In a rather awkward way, thank you to the Prime Minister for providing us with such interesting visual material for study... Lastly, a special thank you to my better half, Garrett, for listening me talk about memes of Theresa May for hours on end, for engaging with my work and showing interest in all of it, despite it often being the opposite. I feel proud that you now know what a GIF is. 2 Structured Abstract Background Theresa May has been the centre oF political controversy since she became UK Prime Minister (in July 2016). An especially controversial decision was her calling a snap election in April 2017, for a General Election (GE) to be held in June 2017. Given the increasing use oF social media to maniFest political views, images play a signiFicant role in the ways in which political views are expressed. Memes and GIFs in particular are a subset oF images that increasingly play an important role in how voters comment on politics on platForms like Twitter. Aim The overall aim oF this dissertation is to better understand the ways in which Twitter users utilised memes and GIFs during the 2017 GE to respond and engage with Theresa May’s campaign and perFormance as a politician and speciFically, as a Female politician. In particular, three case studies were selected, each corresponding to a key aspect oF her campaign during May and June 2017: strong and stable (SAS), weak and wobbly (WAW) and TheresaMayGIFs (TMG). The aim was to understand what was depicted in the memes, who shared the memes and what was the stance oF the memes with regard to Theresa May’s campaign. Methods The dataset consisted oF the 300 most popular shared tweets containing images (100 per case study) and they were collected using Pulsar, a commercial analytics tool. Several social media research methods were employed in the analysis oF the memes, namely content analysis oF image and text, actor type analysis and sentiment analysis of image and text. Specific code frames were developed For each method and second coders were trained to reFine the accuracy of each code frame. The Intercoder Reliability scores of the code frames were reported using Scott’s Pi coeFFicient. Results First, Theresa May’s policies and maniFesto were revealed to be the most reFerred to issues by posters in two oF the three case studies (SAS and WAW), while Theresa May’s TV perFormance was the most Frequent issue in the TMG case study. Second, members oF the public were the most active category oF Twitter user in two oF the three case studies (WAW & TMG), and For the third case study it was political actors (SAS). Lastly, when analysed both in isolation of the text as well as alongside 3 the text, all case studies revealed that the memes were critical oF Theresa May directly or oF an aspect of her campaign. Discussion These Findings suggest the Following implications. First, memes can have a political orientation, and this has the potential to be negative. Second, these Findings suggest that memes are a powerFul Form of political expression and that it is diFFicult For parties to control the narrative online. Third, political parties could consider more clever ways and be savvier when it comes to ways in which they deal with Twitter and memes. Lastly, traditional Forms oF political campaigning and communication, which may imply repeating the same line or slogan over and over again, are not efFective when it comes to certain social media avenues, and particularly Twitter and memes. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction and Context pp 7-11 Chapter 2. Literature Review pp 12-20 2.1. Politics and Social Media pp 12-15 2.2. Visual Representation of Female Politicians pp 15-16 2.3. Memes 2.3.a. Conceptual DeFinition of Memes pp 16-17 2.3.b. Memes and Politics pp 17-19 2.3.c. Memes and British Politics pp 19-20 Chapter 3. Methodology pp 21-34 3.1. Case Studies and Visual MotiFs pp 21-28 3.1.1. Strong and Stable 3.1.2. Weak and Wobbly 3.1.3. TheresaMayGIFs 3.1.4. Maybot 3.1.5. Laughing Theresa May 3.2. Methods pp 28-31 3.2.1. Method 1 Content Analysis of Image and Text 3.2.2. Method 2: Actor Type Analysis 3.2.3. Method 3: Sentiment Analysis of Image and Text 3.2.4. Note For All Methods: Intercoder Reliability 3.3. Data Collection Strategy pp 32-34 3.3.a. Tools and Steps to Retrieve Data 3.3.b. Search Terms 3.3.c. Sample Size 3.3.d. Data Storage and Security 3.3.e. Ethics Chapter 4. Findings, Analysis and Discussion pp 35-63 4.1. Findings: Strong and Stable pp 35-43 4.1.a. Content of Memes 5 4.1.b. Posters oF Memes 4.1.c. Evaluative Stance of Memes 4.1.d. Strong and Stable: Discussion 4.2. Findings: Weak and Wobbly pp 43-50 4.2.a. Content of Memes 4.2.b. Posters of Memes 4.2.c. Evaluative Stance of Memes 4.2.d. Weak and Wobbly: Discussion 4.3. Findings: TheresaMayGIFs pp 51-61 4.3.a. Content of Memes 4.3.b. Posters of Memes 4.3.c. Evaluative Stance of Memes 4.3.d. Weak and Wobbly: Discussion 4.4. Comparing Case Studies pp 61-64 Chapter 5. Conclusion pp 65-68 5.1. Review of Research Questions and Research Objectives – Summary oF main conclusions and Findings 5.2. Limitations of the Research 5.3. Suggestions For Future Research References pp 69-74 Appendix 1 pp 75-77 Code Frame 1 RQ1 Appendix 2 pp 78-80 Code Frame 2 RQ2 Appendix 3 pp 82 Code Frame 3 RQ3 Appendix 4 p 82 [Attached document] Ethics Approval Letter Appendix 5 pp 83-84 [Attached document] Access to Dissertation Form Appendix 6 pp 85-87 [Attached document] ConFirmation of Address Form 6 Chapter 1: Introduction and Context Despite taking charge oF the UK at one oF the most turbulent times in recent political history given the Brexit vote, Theresa May Faced intense criticism that she did not hold a legitimate mandate to be Prime Minister (PM).
Recommended publications
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte
    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit: Initial Reflections
    Brexit: initial reflections ANAND MENON AND JOHN-PAUL SALTER* At around four-thirty on the morning of 24 June 2016, the media began to announce that the British people had voted to leave the European Union. As the final results came in, it emerged that the pro-Brexit campaign had garnered 51.9 per cent of the votes cast and prevailed by a margin of 1,269,501 votes. For the first time in its history, a member state had voted to quit the EU. The outcome of the referendum reflected the confluence of several long- term and more contingent factors. In part, it represented the culmination of a longstanding tension in British politics between, on the one hand, London’s relative effectiveness in shaping European integration to match its own prefer- ences and, on the other, political diffidence when it came to trumpeting such success. This paradox, in turn, resulted from longstanding intraparty divisions over Britain’s relationship with the EU, which have hamstrung such attempts as there have been to make a positive case for British EU membership. The media found it more worthwhile to pour a stream of anti-EU invective into the resulting vacuum rather than critically engage with the issue, let alone highlight the benefits of membership. Consequently, public opinion remained lukewarm at best, treated to a diet of more or less combative and Eurosceptic political rhetoric, much of which disguised a far different reality. The result was also a consequence of the referendum campaign itself. The strategy pursued by Prime Minister David Cameron—of adopting a critical stance towards the EU, promising a referendum, and ultimately campaigning for continued membership—failed.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsnight, BBC Two, 2 November 2012 Finding of 14 December 2012
    Finding of the Editorial Standards Committee of the BBC Trust Newsnight, BBC Two, 2 November 2012 Finding of 14 December 2012 Getting the best out of the BBC for licence fee payers Finding of the Editorial Standards Committee of the BBC Trust Contents Summary 1 ESC Finding 3 Appendix 1: The MacQuarrie Report 10 Appendix 2: Report by the BBC Executive 25 Appendix 3: The Editorial Guidelines 31 Finding of 14 December 2012 Finding of the Editorial Standards Committee of the BBC Trust Summary On 2 November 2012, Newsnight broadcast a report into child sexual abuse in North Wales care homes in the 1970s and 1980s (the “Newsnight Report”). In the Newsnight Report, it was claimed that two victims had been abused by “a leading Conservative politician from the Thatcher years”. The alleged perpetrator was not identified. By the time the Newsnight Report was broadcast, there had been 12 hours of speculation online regarding the identity of the alleged perpetrator. We now know that the man anonymously alleged to be the perpetrator in the Newsnight Report was Lord McAlpine. The following week, on 9 November 2012, Newsnight broadcast their own apology and also included a clip of an interview that had been recorded with the abuse victim, Mr Messham, earlier that day, in which he offered his “humble apologies to Lord McAlpine” for wrongly identifying him as the abuser. The then Director-General of the Executive, George Entwistle, commissioned a report by Ken MacQuarrie, Director Scotland, into what had happened (the “MacQuarrie Report”) (see Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Campaigning for the Labour Party but from The
    Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Nicolas Sigoillot To cite this version: Nicolas Sigoillot. Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Ob- jectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election. Revue française de civilisation britannique, CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d’études en civilisation britannique, 2020, XXV (3), 10.4000/rfcb.5873. hal-03250124 HAL Id: hal-03250124 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03250124 Submitted on 4 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXV-3 | 2020 "Get Brexit Done!" The 2019 General Elections in the UK Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Faire campagne pour le parti travailliste mais depuis l’extérieur et avec des objectifs différents:
    [Show full text]
  • FABIAN REVIEW the Quarterly Magazine of the Fabian Society Spring 2015 / Fabians.Org.Uk / £4.95
    FABIAN REVIEW The quarterly magazine of the Fabian Society Spring 2015 / fabians.org.uk / £4.95 TIME to CHANGE Politics is reinventing itself. The Fabian Review election special investigates how Labour can respond. With Georgia Gould, Peter Hain, Seema Malhotra, Marcus Roberts and more p8 Stephen Bush interviews Labour’s deputy leader Harriet Harman p22 10 things the Fabians have learnt this parliament p27 HAVE TEA WITH SHAW, WEBB AND WELLS… Ask a friend to join the Fabian Society today, and receive an exclusive Fabian “Six Socialists” mug! Drawn by H.G Wells, the “Six Socialists” depicts Fabians Bernard Shaw, Sidney Webb and H.G Wells, together with Keir Hardie, John Burns and Henry Hyndman. THREE GREAT REASONS WHY YOUR FRIEND WILL LOVE BEING A FABIAN: 1. They’ll receive at least four agenda-setting Fabian pamphlets each year, along with the Fabian Review every quarter 2. They’ll get priority entry to all of the Fabian Society’s events 3. They’ll be supporting our research and influencing the debates that will define the future of the left To claim your free “Six Socialists” mug, please email [email protected] with name of your friend who has successfully joined the Fabians FOR MORE INFORMATION visit www.fabians.org.uk/members/join/ or call 020 7227 4904 Contents FABIAN REVIEW Volume 126—No. 1 Leader Andrew Harrop 2 The inequality election Shortcuts Fran O’Leary 3 Digital alchemy Seema Malhotra 3 Keys to the kingdom Nita Clarke 4 Growing together Geoffrey Bindman 5 A more diverse judiciary Suzy Stride 6 Finding the frontline
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Television News Limited Registered Number 548648 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
    2013 ANNUAL REPORT Independent Television News Limited Registered Number 548648 2013 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS The Headlines Page 3 Our Business Page 6 Our People Page 16 Chief Executive’s Review Page 22 Chairman’s Statement Page 26 Strategic Report Page 28 Directors’ Report Page 32 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities Page 34 Independent Auditor’s Report Page 35 Accounts Page 37 2 THE HEADLINES 3 THE HEADLINES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2012 2013 £5.0m £3.7m £3.7m £5.0m £2.3m 3.4% 4.7% £0.9m £2.9m £7.9m swing in operating profit* Operating profit margin* rises ITN’s annual operating profit* rises to £5m in ITN’s operating profit margin* increased from 2013, a £7.9m upwards swing since 2009. 3.4% to 4.7%. * Operating profit on ordinary activities before exceptional * Operating profit margin before exceptional items items ITN sweeps the board ITN Productions growth continues ITN won 43 significant industry awards across ITN Productions continued to grow, producing its divisions in 2013, including prestigious hon- 134 broadcast hours, including seven new series ours from the Royal Television Society and the and 23 advertising campaigns. Foreign Press Association. 4 THE HEADLINES ITV News gets a new look Channel 5 News revamps 6.30pm programme ITV News launched a new look studio and branding as part of ITV’s brand refresh. Channel 5 News launched NewsTalk Live, the UK’s only daily primetime current affairs debate show. Channel 4 News wins an Emmy ITN Source secures Qatar deal Channel 4 News took home the coveted ITN Source won a multi-million pound licensing International Emmy Award as well as being contract with the Qatar Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Psa Awards Winners 2000, 2003 - 2016
    PSA AWARDS WINNERS 2000, 2003 - 2016 AWARDS TO POLITICIANS Politician of the Year Sadiq Khan (2016) George Osborne (2015) Theresa May (2014) John Bercow (2012) Alex Salmond (2011) David Cameron and Nick Clegg (2010) Barack Obama (2009) Boris Johnson (2008) Alex Salmond (2007) David Cameron (2006) Tony Blair (2005) Gordon Brown (2004) Ken Livingstone (2003) Lifetime Achievement in Politics Gordon Brown (2016) Harriet Harman (2015) David Blunkett (2014) Jack Straw (2013) Sir Richard Leese (2012) Bill Morris (2012) Chris Patten (2012) David Steel (2011) Michael Heseltine (2011) Neil Kinnock (2010) Geoffrey Howe (2010) Rhodri Morgan (2009) Ian Paisley (2009) Paddy Ashdown (2007) Prof John Hume (2006) Lord David Trimble (2006) Sir Tam Dalyell (2005) Kenneth Clarke QC (2004) Baroness Williams of Crosby (2003) Dr Garrett Fitzgerald (2003) Roy Jenkins (2000) Denis Healey (2000) Edward Heath (2000) Special Award for Lifetime Achievement in Politics Aung San Suu Kyi (2007) 1 Opposition Politician of the Year Theresa May (2003) Parliamentarian of the Year Baroness Smith of Basildon (2016) Sarah Wollaston (2015) Nicola Sturgeon (2014) Natascha Engel (2013) Margaret Hodge (2012) Ed Balls (2011) Patrick Cormack (2010) Dennis Skinner (2010) Tony Wright (2009) Vince Cable (2008) John Denham (2007) Richard Bacon MP (2006) Sir Menzies Campbell (2005) Gwyneth Dunwoody (2005) Baroness Scotland of Asthal QC (2004) Robin Cook (2003) Tony Benn (2000) Political Turkey of the Year Veritas (2005) The Law Lords (2004) Folyrood - the Scottish Parliament building
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review: Speaking Out: Lessons in Life and Politics by Ed Balls
    Book Review: Speaking Out: Lessons in Life and Politics by Ed Balls blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2016/09/19/book-review-speaking-out-lessons-in-life-and-politics-by-ed-balls/ 9/19/2016 21 years after leaving a career in journalism to work for Labour in opposition, following shock defeat in the May 2015 general election, then UK Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls abruptly found himself without a job. In his new memoir, Speaking Out: Lessons in Life and Politics, he reflects on his life in politics, offering a wider commentary on Labour’s transition from opposition to power and back again as well as key political events and relationships of this period. While readers looking for answers to Labour’s current predicament may need to look elsewhere, this is a worthwhile and often moving account of one individual’s growth across a political life, finds Peter Carrol. Speaking Out: Lessons in Life and Politics. Ed Balls. Cornerstone. 2016. Find this book: At the May 2015 general election, then Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls attended the count for his seat as the Labour MP for Morley and Outwood entertaining the possibility that he might become Chancellor of the Exchequer. Instead, Balls found himself unemployed, ending a 21-year political career which included spells as a close advisor to Gordon Brown at the Treasury, three years as Children’s Minister and four years as Shadow Chancellor serving under his former treasury colleague Ed Miliband. It is the theme of disappointment that runs throughout Balls’s readable account of his political life — disappointment in not becoming Labour leader, disappointment in his failure to become Chancellor and disappointment at inadequate recognition for his achievements at the Treasury.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statecraft Analysis of the Conservative Party
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository A Statecraft Analysis of the Conservative Party: 2001 to 2010 By Anthony John Hopkins A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Political Science and International Studies College of Social Sciences The University of Birmingham December 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis investigates the Conservative Party between 2001 and 2010 and makes its principle contribution to the literature on this period by highlighting the importance of examining how the party has sought office, something which it argues has previously been insufficiently addressed. In order to do this, Jim Bulpitt’s statecraft approach is critically assessed, clarified, improved and adapted in order to provide a framework of analysis that is systematically applied for the first time to a political party in opposition. It argues that accounts of the Conservative Party under Duncan Smith should look beyond the theme of leadership failure to better understand the complex interaction of the party’s putative statecraft and Labour’s dominance of the party political context.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Judgment
    Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWHC 1342 (QB) Case No: HQ12D05281 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 24/05/2013 Before : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : The Lord McAlpine of West Green Claimant - and - Sally Bercow Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sir Edward Garnier QC & Kate Wilson (instructed by RMPI) for the Claimant William McCormick QC & David Mitchell (instructed by Carter Ruck) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 16 May 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Judgment Mr Justice Tugendhat : 1. This hearing is to determine the meaning of the words complained of in this libel action (“the Tweet”), and whether they are defamatory of the Claimant. The Tweet was published on 4 November 2012. The question of its meaning is being tried separately as a preliminary issue. That is not uncommon in libel actions nowadays, in cases where it is agreed that the trial will be by a judge sitting without a jury. 2. If I find that the Tweet is not defamatory of the Claimant, that will be the end of the action. If I find that it is defamatory, then the case will proceed to the assessment of damages (unless the parties reach an agreement). If I find that the Tweet is defamatory, the Defendant does not seek to defend any defamatory meaning as true, or on any other basis. I am not asked to decide the number of people who read the Tweet and understood it in a defamatory meaning. THE TWEET 3. The Tweet reads: “Why is Lord McAlpine trending? *Innocent face*” 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Sam Allardyce ‘Sting’ Is the Latest Chapter in a New Era of Investigative Reporting
    Academic rigour, journalistic flair Sam Allardyce ‘sting’ is the latest chapter in a new era of investigative reporting September 28, 2016 9.44am BST Author John Jewell Director of Undergraduate Studies, School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, Cardiff University England’s football manager, Sam Allardyce, won’t have enjoyed seeing himself in the Daily Telegraph. Nick Potts / PA Wire/Press Association Images The manager of the England football team, Sam Allardyce, has resigned just two months into his job, apparently “by mutual consent” – whatever that means – after being splashed all over the pages of the Daily Telegraph which linked him with allegations of impropriety. The Allardyce “sting” was the first part of what the Telegraph says is a series of stories yielded by a ten-month investigation into corruption in British football. The paper has alleged that Allardyce, who was only appointed to coach England in July, had used his position “to negotiate a £400,000 deal and offered advice to businessmen on how to ‘get around’ FA rules on player transfers”. As is now so often the case in these newspaper investigations in the digital age, the Telegraph used hidden cameras to procure footage without the knowledge of Allardyce or his associates. The results led the morning news on Tuesday as the paper’s rivals scrambled to play catch-up on this apparent gotcha. As well as the main accusations relating to his conduct as manager, Allardyce appears to have been surprisingly indiscreet about – among other things – the psychological deficiencies of the England squad and the qualities of his predecessor as manager, Roy Hodgson.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Own Personal Judas: the Rehabilitation of Jeffrey Archer." Harnessing Chaos: the Bible in English Political Discourse Since 1968
    Crossley, James G. "Your Own Personal Judas: The Rehabilitation of Jeffrey Archer." Harnessing Chaos: The Bible in English Political Discourse Since 1968. London: Bloomsbury T & T Clark, 2014. 183–209. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 23 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567659347.ch-007>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 23 September 2021, 18:37 UTC. Copyright © James G. Crossley 2014. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. Chapter 7 YOUR OWN PERSONAL JUDAS: THE REHABILITATION OF JEFFREY ARCHER 1. Thou Shalt Not Get Caught Despite Thatcherism-without-Thatcher becoming the political norm by the mid-1990s, this period would simultaneously mark a decline of the Conservative Party in British politics, and in no small part due to the ‘toxic’ image that Thatcher had come to represent. Thatcher was brought down in 1990 by a combination of her confrontational style of running cabinet, Michael Heseltine’s leadership ambitions, the long-serving Geoffrey Howe’s devastating resignation speech, and the deeply unpopu- lar Poll Tax. Her apparently consensual replacement, John Major, had surprisingly managed to win the 1992 General Election outright, but it would be downhill for the Tories from then on. The issue of Europe and the EU was ripping the party apart while, among other things, the BSE crisis, recession, and political ‘sleaze’ all but made a crushing defeat in the 1997 election inevitable and one from which they have only just (about) recovered.
    [Show full text]