DOCSLIB.ORG

Iraq Has Moved Far Beyond a Sunni Islamist Or Ba'ath-Driven Insurgency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iraq Has Moved Far Beyond a Sunni Islamist Or Ba'ath-Driven Insurgency Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775-3270 • Fax: 1 (202) 457-8746 Web: http://www.csis.org/burke Iraqi Force Development and the Challenge of Civil War: The Critical Problems The US Must Address if Iraqi Forces Are to Do the Job Anthony Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy With the Assistance of Adam Mausner Revised, April 26, 2007 Cordesman: Iraqi Force Development 4/26/07 Page ii Executive Summary Iraq has moved far beyond a Sunni Islamist or Ba’ath-driven insurgency. It is already in a state of limited civil war, and may well be escalating to the level of a major civil conflict. What began as a small resistance movement centered on loyalists to the Ba’ath and Saddam Hussein has expanded to include neo-Salafi Sunni terrorism, a broadly based Sunni insurgency, and now a series of broader sectarian and ethnic conflicts. The current combination of Sunni Neo-Salafi extremist insurgency, Sunni Arab versus Shi’ite Arab sectarian conflict, Shi’ite versus Shi’ite power struggles, and Arab versus Kurdish ethnic conflict could easily cause the collapse of the current political structure. In the best case, it could lead to a Shi’ite or Shi’ite-Kurdish dominated government, with strong local centers of power, and an ongoing fight with Iraq’s Sunnis. In the worst case, it could escalate to the break up of the country, far more serious ethnic and sectarian conflict, or violent paralysis. It has already led to widespread ethnic cleansing in urban areas by militias and death squads of all three major ethnic and religious groups. If Iraq is to avoid a split and full-blown civil war, it must do far more than create effective Iraqi Security Forces (ISF). No such effort can succeed without an integrated strategy to forge a lasting political compromise between its key factions: Arab-Shi’ite, Arab Sunni, and Kurd – while protecting other minorities. Political conciliation must also address such critical issues as federalism and the relative powers of the central and regional governments, the role of religion in politics and law, control over petroleum resources and export revenues, the definition of human rights, and a host of other issues. Anticipate, Learn and Change versus Persist, React and Be Defeated From the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003 to the present, the US has failed to implement a realistic and properly self-critical approach to policies and actions in Iraq. It is unclear that it could have succeeded under the best of circumstance, but one of its most critical failures has been to consistently deny the fact it was pursuing a high-risk effort in nation building and stability operations that could easily fail. In practice, the US neither did an adequate job of anticipating the problems it had to solve nor rapidly adapted to the emerging realities in Iraq. Its national security leadership became a self-inflicted wound, and the US lurched from delayed response to response, always reacting too slowly and in a state of quasi-denial. One key problem was the failure to properly estimate the nature of the violence in Iraq; its steadily more complex nature, and the rate at which it would grow more intense. These broad problems in the US conceptual approach to Iraq, and in the strategy and practice of nation building and stability operations, have had a major impact on the development of Iraqi forces. The Multinational Security Transition Command- Iraq (MNSTC-I) has had to make at least three major adaptations to its plans to develop Iraqi Security Forces during 2004-2007. Most notably, the assumption that the ISF would face a declining level of violence over time had to be changed to assume that they would have to overmatch their enemies at a constant level of violence. As of the spring of 2007, MNSTC-I was actively in the process of conducting “In-Stride Assessment of the Iraqi Security Forces” to determine what adaptations must be made in the second half of 2007 and beyond. A similar assessment in 2006 led directly to Prime Minister Maliki’s decision to increase the size of the Iraqi Army and to fund it through Foreign Military Cordesman: Iraqi Force Development 4/26/07 Page iii Sales. That funding has been incorporated in the current FMS account and is being used to grow the force. Nevertheless, the US never developed an effective overall strategy for dealing with political conciliation, the development of all elements of Iraqi forces, improving the quality of Iraqi governance, and economic aid and development. The end result was to increase security problems, and the pressure on Iraqi forces, in ways that help bring Iraqi to the edge of large-scale civil war. The new strategy to stabilize Iraq that the US announced in the fall of 2005 was no more credible than its predecessors. It was based on an exaggerated estimate of political success, an almost deliberately false exaggeration of the success of the economic aid effort, unrealistic estimates of progress in developing the ISF, and inadequate efforts to develop effective governance and the rule of law. As a result, the US government, its national security decision makers, and its intelligence community underestimated the threat Iraqi Army forces would face, underestimated the problems in developing effective Iraqi police forces, and called for an unrealistically rapid transfer of responsibility to Iraqi Security Forces. Real progress was being made in developing the ISF, but a combination of political pressure in Washington and failure to admit the growing level of violence in Iraq called for more progress than was possible as well as inadequate resources. This situation was further complicated by Iraqi political problems and decisions. The MNF-I and MNSTC-I had to deal with two interim governments and elected government after 2005 that forced US and other Coalition advisors to try to temper efforts by senior Iraqi civilian and military leaders to take even great responsibility and control over the development of the ISF before it was ready. The US military has operated under pressure from both Washington and Baghdad, and one senior MNSTC-I officer described US efforts in dealing with the Iraqi Army as follows in late April 2007: We have never strayed from the principle of a standardized training curriculum for both new Iraqi units and individual replacements despite great pressure to do so from our Iraqi counterparts. Nor have we rushed Iraqi units into battle. In fact, the addition of transition teams to tactical units in March 2005 was intended to ensure we had a valid, reasonable understanding of their capabilities… It is worth noting that more than 3,500 Iraqi soldiers and 4,500 Iraqi Policemen have been killed in action in the past two years. Another 18,000 have been wounded in action. Iraq’s security ministries as well as military and police leaders are taking “ownership” of their country’s security problems to the extent we have thus far allowed them to.” The twin impact of the pressures from the US and Iraqi governments were all too clear in the efforts to improve security in Baghdad in 2006. Iraq forces were not ready for the task, and the Iraqi government proved unable or unwilling to deal effectively with the Shi’ite militias that had become as serious a problem as the Sunni insurgents. Later efforts to strengthen the Iraqi effort with more US advisors and limited numbers of US troops proved equally ineffective. The US and ISF found themselves fighting battles in Baghdad, and in other areas with a high level of Sunni insurgent activity, where they could “win” at the tactical level, but not defeat or eliminate any armed faction, could not “hold” areas in ways that provided lasting security, and could not “build” in providing either effective government services or conditions that allowed economic progress and development. Cordesman: Iraqi Force Development 4/26/07 Page iv The Need for Comprehensive Action and Strategy The new “surge” strategy to secure Baghdad that President Bush announced in January 2007 will provide a much large US military contingent, more Iraqi forces, and a new approach to strengthening the role of the Iraqi police. Real success, however, depends on providing a far higher degree of security for a city with well over five million people and much broader political conciliation among Iraq’s warring factions. It is far from clear whether it will prove possible to secure the greater Baghdad area, and the ring cities around it, with the US and Iraqi resources available. Success may also require a level of patience and persistence that the US political climate could make impossible, particularly if a sustained effort is needed well into 2008. Iraqi progress in conciliation is uncertain at best, and may also move too slowly to be acceptable to the Congress and American people. Once again, the US may be demanding too much, too soon, and trying to force the pace in ways which increase the already serious risk of failure. What is clear is that the US cannot secure either Baghdad or Iraq without effective Iraqi security forces and this includes both the Army and Police. At the same time, no strategy that hinges solely on the successful development of the ISF can succeed. Iraq must establish both effective governance and a rule of law; not simply deploy effective military, security, and police forces. Legitimacy does not consist of determining how governments are chosen, but in how well they serve the day-to-day needs of their peoples.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rebooting U.S. Security Cooperation in Iraq
    Rebooting U.S. Security Cooperation in Iraq MICHAEL KNIGHTS POLICY FOCUS 137 Rebooting U.S. Security Cooperation in Iraq MICHAEL KNIGHTS THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY www.washingtoninstitute.org The opinions expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Washington Institute, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publica- tion may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2015 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20036 Design: 1000colors Photo: A Kurdish fighter keeps guard while overlooking positions of Islamic State mili- tants near Mosul, northern Iraq, August 2014. (REUTERS/Youssef Boudlal) CONTENTS Acknowledgments | v Acronyms | vi Executive Summary | viii 1 Introduction | 1 2 Federal Government Security Forces in Iraq | 6 3 Security Forces in Iraqi Kurdistan | 26 4 Optimizing U.S. Security Cooperation in Iraq | 39 5 Issues and Options for U.S. Policymakers | 48 About the Author | 74 TABLES 1 Effective Combat Manpower of Iraq Security Forces | 8 2 Assessment of ISF and Kurdish Forces as Security Cooperation Partners | 43 FIGURES 1 ISF Brigade Order of Battle, January 2015 | 10 2 Kurdish Brigade Order of Battle, January 2015 | 28 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My thanks to a range of colleagues for their encouragement and assistance in the writing of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Hard Offensive Counterterrorism
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2019 The Use of Force: Hard Offensive Counterterrorism Daniel Thomas Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the International Relations Commons Repository Citation Thomas, Daniel, "The Use of Force: Hard Offensive Counterterrorism" (2019). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 2101. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/2101 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE USE OF FORCE: HARD OFFENSIVE COUNTERTERRORISM A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By DANIEL THOMAS B.A., The Ohio State University, 2015 2019 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL Defense Date: 8/1/19 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Daniel Thomas ENTITLED The Use of Force: Hard Offensive Counterterrorism BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts. _______________________ Vaughn Shannon, Ph.D. Thesis Director ________________________ Laura M. Luehrmann, Ph.D. Director, Master of Arts Program in International and Comparative Politics Committee on Final Examination: ___________________________________ Vaughn Shannon, Ph.D. School of Public and International Affairs ___________________________________ Liam Anderson, Ph.D. School of Public and International Affairs ___________________________________ Pramod Kantha, Ph.D. School of Public and International Affairs ______________________________ Barry Milligan, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conflict in Iraq 23 MAY 2003
    RESEARCH PAPER 03/50 The Conflict in Iraq 23 MAY 2003 Military operations to remove the Iraqi regime from power (Operation Iraqi Freedom) began officially at 0234 GMT on 20 March 2003. Coalition forces advanced rapidly into Iraq, encountering sporadic resistance from Iraqi military and paramilitary forces. By mid-April major combat operations had come to an end, with coalition forces in effective control of the whole country, including the capital Baghdad. This paper provides a summary of events in the build- up to the conflict, a general outline of the main developments during the military campaign between 20 March and mid April 2003 and an initial post-conflict assessment of the conduct of operations. Claire Taylor & Tim Youngs INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AND DEFENCE SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: List of 15 most recent RPs 03/35 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2003-04-11 10.04.03 03/36 Unemployment by Constituency, March 2003 17.04.03 03/37 Economic Indicators [includes article: The current WTO trade round] 01.05.03 03/38 NHS Foundation Trusts in the Health and Social Care 01.05.03 (Community Health and Standards) Bill [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/39 Social Care Aspects of the Health and Social Care (Community Health 02.05.03 and Standards Bill) [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/40 Social Indicators 06.05.03 03/41 The Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) 06.05.03 Bill: Health aspects other than NHS Foundation Trusts [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/42 The Fire Services Bill [Bill 81 of 2002-03] 07.05.03
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Years Later, the Political Landscape in Iraq Thomas Sommer-Houdeville
    6 years Later, The Political Landscape in Iraq Thomas Sommer-Houdeville To cite this version: Thomas Sommer-Houdeville. 6 years Later, The Political Landscape in Iraq: Report for the Iraqi Civil Society Initiative. 2009. halshs-00373434 HAL Id: halshs-00373434 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00373434 Preprint submitted on 5 Apr 2009 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Iraqi Civil Society Solidarity initiative مبادرة التظامن للمجتمع المدني العراقي Velletri: 25-31 March 2009 Six Years Later: The Political Landscape in Iraq A Report for the Iraqi Civil Society Solidarity Initiative 16 March 2009 Written by Thomas Sommer-Houdeville Edited by Herbert Docena, Gemma Houldey, Taverna Jordan, Fabio Alberti 1 Table des matières 1) The aftermath of the Chaos:.........................................................3 The ’Sectarianisation‘ of Iraq:............................................................................................3 “The Battle of Baghdad’.....................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainment of Army Forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as CHILD POLICY a public service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY organization providing objective analysis and POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY effective solutions that address the challenges facing SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY the public and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND Support RAND INFRASTRUCTURE Purchase this document WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Arroyo Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Sustainment of Army Forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom Battlefield Logistics and Effects on Operations Eric Peltz, John M. Halliday, Marc L. Robbins, Kenneth J. Girardini Prepared for the United States Army Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wages of War: Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in The
    THE WAGES OF WAR Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict Project on Defense Alternatives Research Monograph #8 Carl Conetta 20 October 2003 INDEX 1. Introduction 2. Organization and method 3. Iraqi noncombatant fatalities in the 2003 war 3.1 Baghdad 3.1.1. Reconciling the Baghdad hospital records on civilian dead 3.1.2. Other categories of Baghdad war dead 3.1.3. Total war dead in Baghdad 3.1.4. The problem of distinguishing combatants and noncombatants 3.2. Noncombatant death toll outside Baghdad 3.2.1. Noncombatant death toll in Basra, Nasiriyah, Al Hillah, and Najaf 3.2.2. Noncombatant deaths elsewhere 3.3. Total Iraqi noncombatant death toll 4. Iraqi combatant fatalities in the 2003 war 4.1. Reported field observation of Iraqi combatant deaths 4.2. Estimating the fatal effects of long-range artillery 4.3. Estimating the fatal effects of long-range air power 4.3.1. Air interdiction of ground units 4.3.2. The attack on strategic, air supremacy, and “military system” targets. 4.4. Total Iraqi combatant fatalities 5. Total Iraqi fatalities in the 2003 war 6. Casualty comparison: Iraqi Freedom and Desert Storm 7. Conclusion: Iraqi War Fatalities and the Paradox of the “New Warfare” Notes Appendix 1. Survey of reported Iraqi combatant fatalities in the 2003 War Appendix 2. Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 1991 Gulf War THE WAGES OF WAR Iraqi Combatant and Noncombatant Fatalities in the 2003 Conflict Project on Defense Alternatives Research Monograph #8 Carl Conetta 20 October 2003 It's not pretty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biopolitics of Baghdad: Counterinsurgency and the Counter-City Derek Gregory
    The Biopolitics of Baghdad: Counterinsurgency and the counter-city Derek Gregory Department of Geography University of British Columbia at Vancouver The cultural turn and late modern war Many of the problems that the United States has faced since its invasion of Iraq in 2003 can be traced back to a reluctance by the Bush administration to use two words, and a failure to plan and prepare for either of them: occupation and insurgency. The two are of course connected; people don’t like living under military occupation. While American troops did not find the streets of Baghdad strewn with the promised rose petals, they did find them full of people. Yet prevailing models of urban warfare had visualized enemy cities as targets and as object-spaces – three-dimensional geometries of buildings, streets and utility networks – emptied of their populations. The reality of military occupation evidently required different ways of comprehending the city. 1 So too did the rapid spread of resistance to the occupation, but the Pentagon had become so entranced by its Revolution in Military Affairs and force transformation, so invested in high technology and network-centric warfare against the conventional forces of nation-states, that it was radically unprepared for the reinvention of asymmetric warfare in so-called ‘new wars’ waged by transnational, non-state and non-hierarchical adversaries in the margins and breaches of former empires. 2 The US military had not revised its doctrine on counterinsurgency for twenty years, and in an attempt to shore up a rapidly deteriorating !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 The intricate wiring of the military-industry-media-entertainment complex (MIME) ensured that this had its media counterpart.
    [Show full text]
  • Band of Brothers Or Dysfunctional Family? a Military Perspective on Coalition Challenges During Stability Operations
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Purchase this document TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND mono- graphs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Band of Brothers or Dysfunctional Family? A Military Perspective on Coalition Challenges During Stability Operations Russell W.
    [Show full text]
  • From Dictatorship to Democracy: Iraq Under Erasure Abeer Shaheen
    From Dictatorship to Democracy: Iraq under Erasure Abeer Shaheen Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 ©2015 Abeer Shaheen All rights reserved ABSTRACT From Dictatorship to Democracy: Iraq under Erasure Abeer Shaheen This dissertation examines the American project in Iraq between 1991 and 2006. It studies the project’s conceptual arc, shifting ontology, discourses, institutions, practices, and technologies in their interrelatedness to constitute a new Iraq. It is an ethnography of a thixotropic regime of law and order in translation; a circuit through various landscapes and temporalities to narrate the 1991 war, the institutionalization of sanctions and inspection regimes, material transformations within the American military, the 2003 war and finally the nation- building processes as a continuous and unitary project. The dissertation makes three central arguments: First, the 2003 war on Iraq was imagined through intricate and fluid spaces and temporalities. Transforming Iraq into a democratic regime has served as a catalyst for transforming the American military organization and the international legal system. Second, this project has reordered the spatialized time of Iraq by the imposition of models in translation, reconfigured and reimagined through a realm of violence. These models have created in Iraq a regime of differential mobility, which was enabled through an ensemble of experts, new institutions and calculative technologies. Third, this ensemble took Iraq as its object of knowledge and change rendering Iraq and Iraqis into a set of abstractions within the three spaces under examination: the space of American military institutions; the space of international legality within the United Nations; and, lastly, the material space of Baghdad.
    [Show full text]
  • Hand in Glove by Rebecca Grant
    In Gulf War II, the Air Force and Army discovered a new “sweet spot” in combat cooperation. Hand in Glove By Rebecca Grant Desert Destruction. Tank carcasses (here, hulk of an Iraqi T-55) were a common sight. The goal was to move beyond “deconfliction” and harmonize the combat power of air and land forces. N RECENT years, the Air going to see is a new air-land dy- said airpower had been effective ini- tain Victory: The US Army in the Force and Army periodi- namic,” he said recently. “It is as if tially but had been less so in the Gulf War, written by Army Brig. cally have pushed to im- we will have discovered a new sweet war’s latter stages. Gen. Robert H. Scales Jr., docu- prove their cooperation spot in the relationship between land Schwarzkopf’s statement angered mented profound bitterness caused in joint warfare. The warfare and air warfare.” airmen who had executed a high- by misunderstanding of the air com- IAirLand Battle doctrine of the 1980s Finding that sweet spot was no intensity, 38-day-long air campaign ponent’s target selection process. coordinated some service strengths. sure thing. The 1991 Gulf War coa- that had shredded Iraq’s ground Two corps commanders, Army Lt. The so-called “31 Initiatives” of that lition won a major victory, but coop- forces and made possible a 100-hour Gens. Gary E. Luck and Frederick era helped to shape USAF’s E-8 Joint eration of air and land components Army walkover against a devastated M.
    [Show full text]
  • During the 2007 Iraq Troop "Surge" Luke Mccorkel
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) 1-1-2012 The evelopmeD nt and Application of the "Petraeus Doctrine" During the 2007 Iraq Troop "Surge" Luke McCorkel Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Recommended Citation McCorkel, Luke, "The eD velopment and Application of the "Petraeus Doctrine" During the 2007 Iraq Troop "Surge"" (2012). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 800. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/800 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY University College International Affairs The Development and Application of the “Petraeus Doctrine” During the “2007 Iraq Troop Surge” by Luke Arthur McCorkel A thesis presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts May 2012 Saint Louis, Missouri TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………….........1 CHAPTER 1: 2003-2005 “HOW TO WIN A WAR, LOSE A PEACE, AND CREATE AN INSURGENCY”……………………………………………………….3 CHAPTER 2: 2006- ATROCITES, CIVIL WAR AND GAMBLES……………….27 CHAPTER 3: 2007- ALL IN………………………………………………………...52 CHAPTER 4: 2008- AN IRAQI WAR………………………………………………75 CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………82 BIBLIOGRAPY……………………………………………………………………...89 -ii - The Development and Application of the Petraeus Doctrine in the 2007 Iraq Troop Surge Luke McCorkel, Washington University in Saint Louis Master’s Thesis Abstract: In Spring 2007 President Bush ordered additional American troops to Iraq as part of a troop Surge to wage a counter-offensive based on the tactics of the newly developed Petraeus Doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • Baghdad”: Space, Representation, and the Colonial Present
    Wandering the Streets of “Baghdad”: Space, Representation, and the Colonial Present by Wesley Attewell B.A. (hon.), The University of British Columbia, 2007 M.A., The University of British Columbia, 2009 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Geography) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2009 © Wesley Attewell, 2009 ii Abstract In this thesis, I will explore the triangular relationship between space, representational practices, and the colonial present. I will grapple with a few key research questions: how do we, as Westerners, represent the “other”? How, in turn, do we represent “ourselves”? How have these representational practices shaped the conduct of the War on Terror? And finally, how are (neo)colonial struggles over the politics of representation intricately bound up with questions of geography? By focusing my attention upon the recent invasion, and subsequent occupation of Iraq, I hope to offer a historico-geographically responsible, as well as anti-essentialist, reading of three distinct “digital spaces”: two blogs (Riverbend’s Baghdad Burning and Colby Buzzell’s My War: Killing Time in Iraq ) and Multi-National Force Iraq’s YouTube channel. Here, I will argue that, to paraphrase Edward Said, broader geographical struggles, over forms, over images, and over imaginings are not only being dispersed around the globe, they are also being fractured and subsequently contested on a more micro-scale in these new digital battlegrounds. As I hope to demonstrate over the course of this thesis, social media websites such as blogs and YouTube must conceptualized not only as political, but also as antipolitical spaces, in that they both encourage and stifle critical debate on issues pertaining to late modern warfare.
    [Show full text]