Work Zone Operations Best Practices Guidebook (Third Edition)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Work Zone Operations Best Practices Guidebook (Third Edition) Work Zone Operations Best Practices Guidebook (Third Edition) Publication No. FHWA-HOP-13-012 August 2013 Notice The Federal Highway Administration provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-13-012 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date July 2013 Work Zone Operations Best Practices Guidebook (Third Edition) 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Various Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) 11251 Roger Bacon Drive Reston, VA 20190 11. Contract or Grant No. DTFH61-06-D-00005 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Federal Highway Administration Covered 1/23/2008 to 10/30/2013 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 14. Sponsoring Agency Code HOTO 15. Supplementary Notes Project Leader - Tracy Scriba, FHWA 16. Abstract This Work Zone Best Practices Guidebook provides an easily accessible compilation of work zone operations practices used and recommended by various States and localities around the country. The Guidebook is a reference document that can be updated with new approaches, technologies, and practices for effectively managing work zones and reducing the impacts of work zones on mobility and safety as they are identified. The best practices are descriptive, not prescriptive. They describe approaches that have been successfully used by transportation agencies, along with contact information to find out more from the agency using the practice. Each organization must determine which of these practices are best suited for its particular situation, considering all the site-specific factors that affect work zone operations. The best practices are grouped into 11 major categories to help practitioners easily find practices that deal with a particular topic. Practices can also be found via six cross-references that enable users to find best practices in several different ways, and a subject index that offers 49 topics and subtopics for more specific searches. The Guidebook is available in two formats: a print version, which can be ordered by mail or downloaded as a PDF and printed, and a web-based, searchable version. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Work zone, best practice, safety, mobility, guidebook, No restrictions. This document is available to the public. construction, maintenance, road rehabilitation, policy, planning, design, traffic analysis and modeling, construction methods, contracting, traveler and traffic information, traffic management planning, work zone management, worker safety, work zone ITS. 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 293 N/A Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized. This page intentionally blank Table of Contents Foreword and Acknowledgments ...................................................................................... i Work Zone Best Practices Registration Form ..................................................................iii Work Zone Best Practices Submission Form ................................................................... v Work Zone Best Practices Comment Form .....................................................................vii Overview of the Guidebook ..............................................................................................1 Best Practices Cross-References By State/FHWA ......................................................................................................3 By Project Life Cycle Stage ...................................................................................4 By Nature of the Work ...........................................................................................5 By Traffic Conditions ..............................................................................................5 By Geographic/Demographic Characteristics ........................................................5 By Roadway Characteristics ..................................................................................6 Best Practices Descriptions A - Policy and Procedures .....................................................................................7 B - Public Relations, Education, and Outreach (Program Level)…………………49 C - Modeling and Impact Analysis .......................................................................71 D - Planning and Programming ...........................................................................79 E - Project Development and Design.................................................................101 F - Contracting and Bidding Procedures............................................................135 G - Construction/Maintenance Materials, Methods, Practices, and Specifications...................................................................................147 H -Traveler and Traffic Information (Project Related) ........................................199 I - Enforcement ..................................................................................................229 J - ITS and Innovative Technology .....................................................................241 K - Evaluation and Feedback .............................................................................257 Best Practices Subject Index ........................................................................................275 This page intentionally blank Work Zone Operations Best Practices Guidebook Foreword and Acknowledgments This Guidebook is the third release of a resource designed to give State and local transportation agencies, construction contractors, transportation planners, trainers, researchers and others with interest in work zone operations access to information and points of contact about current best practices for improving work zone mobility and safety. The Guidebook is available in two formats: a print version, which can be ordered by mail or downloaded as a PDF and printed, and a web-based, searchable version. The PDF and web-based versions of the Guidebook are available via the Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations work zone website: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/workzones. Printed copies of the Guidebook can be obtained by sending an email with the name of the publication you are requesting, number of copies needed, and shipping directions, to [email protected]. In addition to the collection of work zone best practices and associated cross- references, the Guidebook includes three forms designed to make the Guidebook more useful to current and future users. These are 1) a registration form, 2) a best practices submission form, and 3) a best practices review and comment form. Please complete the registration form so that you can be included in distributions of future editions of this document and notified when updated information is available. The Guidebook’s origins date back to the June 1999 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Meeting of the Subcommittee on Traffic Engineering (SCOTE). At that meeting, the Director or FHWA’s Office of Transportation Operations and the Chairman of the AASHTO SCOTE Best Practices in Work Zones Task Force agreed to collaborate on the development, publication, and distribution of a Work Zones Best Practices Guidebook that would give practitioners easy access to these best practices. Since then, AASHTO and FHWA have continued to work together in the development of the Guidebook. AASHTO provides subject matter expertise and access to practitioners, while FHWA provides national coordination, research, and publication support. The AASHTO Work Zone Task Force has continued to collaborate with FHWA on the Guidebook. In preparation for this version of the Guidebook, the Task Force provided a review of new practices being considered for addition to the Guidebook and provided recommendations for deleting, revising, and combining existing best practices. In addition, State points of contact reviewed their practices and provided recommended updates and additions, as well as deletions of practices no longer in use. FHWA also reviewed all practices, and combined some similar practices to avoid repetition. As a result of these efforts, the Guidebook has been significantly updated: • 23 new practices were added to the Guidebook in this version. • 66 out-of-date practices were deleted. • 3 practices were combined with others for clarity • Nearly all of the 172 practices were updated. i Work Zone Operations Best Practices Guidebook This page intentionally blank ii Work Zone Operations Best Practices Guidebook Work Zone Best Practices Guidebook Registration Please take a few moments to complete the following registration form. By submitting the form you will be notified when addendums are available on the web site, and included in any distributions of future printed editions of the Guidebook. An online version of the form is available on the FHWA work zone website at http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/practices/best/bestpractices.htm.
Recommended publications
  • Directions to Mccormick.Indd
    DIRECTIONS & ADDRESS TO: McCORMICK PLACE MARSHALLING AREA (3050 Moe Drive, Chicago, IL 60616) notes North of Chicago to McCormick Place: Interstate 90 (Kennedy Expressway) to Interstate 55 North. Take I-55 North until it ends. Bear right and EXIT at Lake Shore Drive South (41 south). Proceed approximately ½ mile and exit at 31st Street. Proceed up the exit ramp and bear right. Turn right at U-TURN BEFORE the stop light onto Moe Drive. If you went to the light you went too far. After making U- EXHIBITOR Turn go approximately ¼ of a mile to the fi rst stop sign. Turn left at the Stop sign and, YOU ARE THERE!!! West of Chicago to McCormick Place: Interstate 290 (Eisenhower Expressway) east to Interstate 94 (Dan Ryan Expressway). South on Interstate 94 (Dan Ryan Expressway) to Interstate 55 North. Take I-55 North until it ends. Bear right and EXIT at Lake Shore Drive South (41 south). Proceed approximately ½ mile and exit at 31st Street. Proceed up the exit ramp and bear right. Turn right at U-TURN BEFORE the stop light onto Moe Drive. If you went to the light you went too far. After making U-Turn go approximately ¼ of a mile to the fi rst stop sign. Turn left at the Stop sign and, YOU ARE THERE!!! Southwest of Chicago to McCormick Place: Interstate 55 North until it ends. Bear right and EXIT at Lake Shore Drive South (41 south). Proceed approximately ½ mile and exit at 31st Street. Proceed up the exit ramp and bear right. Turn right at U-TURN BEFORE the stop light onto Moe Drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx
    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • City of Milwaukee, Wis. Environmental Assessment October 2011
    City of Milwaukee, Wis. Environmental Assessment October 2011 Prepared by the City of Milwaukee in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) Milwaukee Streetcar Environmental Assessment ii October 2011 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES Lead Agency: Federal Transit Administration Project Sponsors: City of Milwaukee WHERE TO FIND COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT A hard copy of the document is available for public inspection at the Federal Transit Administration field office at the following location: Federal Transit Administration Region V 200 West Adams Street, Suite 320 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Hard copies of the document will also be available at the following locations: Milwaukee Public Library – Central Milwaukee Public Library – Center Street 814 W. Wisconsin Avenue 2727 W. Fond du Lac Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53210 Milwaukee Public Library – Forest Home Milwaukee Department of City Development 1432 W. Forest Home Avenue 809 Broadway, 1st Floor Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Legislative Reference Bureau, Milwaukee City Hall City Hall, Room B-11 200 East Wells Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 To view an electronic copy of this document, please visit the project Web site at www.themilwaukeestreetcar.com. CONTACT INFORMATION For additional information concerning this document please contact our public involvement coordinator who can direct your questions and comments to the appropriate person: Lois Kimmelman, Environmental Protection Specialist Federal Transit Administration Region 5 200 West Adams St., Suite 320 Chicago, IL 60606 Kristine Martinsek, Milwaukee Streetcar Public Involvement Coordinator Martinsek and Associates 1325 E. Potter Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53207 Milwaukee Streetcar Environmental Assessment iii October 2011 ABSTRACT The proposed Milwaukee Streetcar project would establish a starter streetcar system in and around downtown Milwaukee connecting workers, visitors and residents to key destinations and attractions.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Improvement of Interstate 80/94
    Proposed Improvement of Interstate 80/94 Interstate 294 to U.S. Route 41 (Calumet Avenue) Cook County, Illinois Lake County, Indiana T.H.E. Conference – University of Illinois February 24, 2004 Regional Map Project Dates • July 1995 – Project Initiated • May 1999 – Funding Announced through Illinois FIRST • September 2001 – Begin Phase II Design • November 2001 – Public Hearing • June 2003 – Design Approval • August 2003 – First of Over 25 Contract Awards Project Location Traffic Volumes Current: 130,000 - 159,000 Vehicles per Day Projected 2020: 164,000 - 192,000 Vehicles per Day 27 % Multi-Unit Trucks Needs Identified • Improve Highway Safety • Improve Mobility • Improve the Configuration and Condition of the Roadway Project Overview EB I-80 to NB I-94 I-80/I-94 Junction WB I-80/94 Split WB I-80 Under Capacity Torrence Ave Interchange BERNICE ROAD 176th PLACE Proposed Features • Proposed Improvement Plan – Complete Reconstruction – Four Continuous Through Traffic Lanes in Each Direction – Auxiliary Lanes for Entrance and Exit Maneuvers – Drainage System – Elimination of 2 Pump Stations – Noise Abatement Walls – Roadway Lighting Origin-Destination Study – 354267 % of westboundeastboundtraffic is through traffictraffic traffic exitingfrom Torrencecontinuing at Torrence Avenue east- Avenuecontinueswest along comes west Interstate onfrom Interstate Interstate 80 80 94 I-80/I-94/IL 394 Interchange Flyover to I-94 4 Through Lanes To Torrence Ave Flyover to IL 394 I-80/94 Reconfiguration I-80 I-94 / IL 394 4 Through Lanes I-94 IL 394 To Torrence
    [Show full text]
  • By Supervisor Jursik, 1 2 a RESOLUTION 3 4
    1 By Supervisor Jursik, 2 3 A RESOLUTION 4 5 Requesting Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Committee (SEWRPC) create a 6 study committee to investigate the feasibility and desirability of extending the Lake 7 Parkway to Highway 100 at Ryan Road or other connection to Racine County 8 9 WHEREAS, the Lake Parkway (Highway 794) which opened in 1998, is an 10 important link from the Hoan Bridge (which is Interstate 794) to the southeastern part of 11 Milwaukee County; and 12 13 WHEREAS, this Parkway provides direct access to Cudahy (at Pennsylvania 14 Avenue), St. Francis (at Howard Avenue), Milwaukee (at Oklahoma Avenue and at 15 Carferry Drive) and to all three cities at Layton Avenue; and 16 17 WHEREAS, this Parkway carries over 46,000 vehicles per day to and from the 18 Hoan Bridge with links to other freeways through the Marquette Interchange and exits 19 at the Port of Milwaukee and General Mitchell International Airport; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the residence of Oak Creek, South Milwaukee and Racine County are 22 required to use local residential streets to access the Lake Parkway and these streets are 23 not designed for the current or future traffic; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the Lake Parkway could be extended to the south, adjacent to the 26 existing railroad right of way with little impact on the adjacent uses if it is connected 27 with Highway 100 at Ryan Road or Wisconsin Highway 32 or at any connection in Racine 28 County; and 29 30 WHEREAS, the planning and feasibility of this extension is best evaluated by all 31 the local effected
    [Show full text]
  • I-294/I-57 Interchange Cook County, Illinois
    I-294/I-57 INTERCHANGE COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM Proposed 147th Street Improvements - Kedzie Avenue to Western Avenue/Dixie Highway I-57/I-294 Interchange - Minor Updates Based on New Environmental Studies FEBRUARY 2009 I-294/I-57 EA Addendum TABLE OF CONTENTS Background and History............................................................................................. 1 Environmental Assessment Addendum..................................................................... 3 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED......................................................................................... 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 3 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................. 5 2.3 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED IN DETAIL........................................................ 5 2.3.2 Preferred Alternative..................................................................... 5 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 3.1 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS .......................................................... 5 3.1.1 Social and Economic Affected Environment............................... 6 3.1.1.12 Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Facilities........................... 6 3.1.2 Social and Economic Environmental Consequences.................... 6 3.2 FARMLAND ...................................................................................................7 3.3 AIR QUALITY...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • US 41 Interstate Conversion Study, Executive Summary
    Executive Summary Description of the Proposed Action The Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT), in consultation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), is studying alternatives to convert United States Highway 41 (US 41) from a non-Interstate freeway on the National Highway System (NHS) to an Interstate Highway between the Zoo Interchange on Interstate 94 (I-94/I-894) in Milwaukee and the US 41/I-43 interchange in Green Bay. The overall study corridor extends through Kenosha, Racine, Milwaukee, Waukesha, Washington, Dodge, Fond du Lac, Winnebago, Outagamie, and Brown counties. See project location map on previous page. As a result, WisDOT and FHWA have limited the proposed action in this environmental document to the following: x Consider the broad costs and benefits of Interstate conversion. x Evaluate the impacts of signing US 41 between Milwaukee and Green Bay with an Interstate route number and changing the designation of other segments of the study corridor. x Determine the construction impacts of installing Interstate signing and other minor improvements along the study corridor. Based on the results of the evaluation, WisDOT will determine whether to convert US 41 to an Interstate Highway. Purpose of and Need for the Project The purpose of the proposed action is to enhance and accelerate economic development by converting the US 41 corridor to an Interstate Highway and signing it thus. The need for the proposed action is based in part on economics and in part on meeting the intent of the previous federal surface transportation law which identified the US 41 corridor a high priority corridor on the NHS and designated it a future Interstate route.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Illinois
    State of Illinois Illinois Department of Transportation District 1 – Urban Interstate Resurfacing Milling and resurfacing on Interstate 290 from Sacramento Boulevard to Interstate 90/94 in Chicago. District 2 – Rural 4 Lane Bridge Rehabilitation Miscellaneous repairs on the structure carrying Interstate 80 over the Mississippi River. District 6 – Rural 2 Lane Concrete pavement on County Highway 10 east of Elkhart. District 6 – Urban Streetscape Streetscape reconstruction that includes new concrete pavers, sidewalks, lighting, planting beds and traffic signals on Capitol Avenue between 5th Street and 7th Street in Springfield. District 8 – Urban Pedestrian Bridge Construction Construction of a 3-span pedestrian bridge, sidewalk, lighting, landscaping, sewer and retaining walls for the city of Alton over US 67 at Riverfront Park. Printed by authority of the State of Illinois, 0445-11, 01/11, 500 FY 2012-2017 Proposed Highway Improvement Program Spring 2011 Published by the Illinois Department of Transportation Springfield, Illinois 62764 Printed by authority of State of Illinois, April 2011, 275 copies. This document is printed on recycled paper. This document is available on-line at www.dot.il.gov/opp/publications.html. CONTENTS Page Program Development Process ................................... 1 Seeking Public Involvement – Outreach Meetings ....... 3 Executive Summary ..................................................... 5 Department of Transportation District Map ................. 21 Public Review and Comment Form ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2019-C17 Form FWP Filed 2019-09
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM FWP Filing under Securities Act Rules 163/433 of free writing prospectuses Filing Date: 2019-09-19 SEC Accession No. 0001539497-19-001540 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) SUBJECT COMPANY UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2019-C17 Mailing Address Business Address 1285 AVENUE OF THE 1285 AVENUE OF THE CIK:1785812| State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 AMERICAS AMERICAS Type: FWP | Act: 34 | File No.: 333-227784-04 | Film No.: 191102145 NEW YORK NY 10019 NEW YORK NY 10019 SIC: 6189 Asset-backed securities 212-713-2000 FILED BY UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. Mailing Address Business Address 1285 AVENUE OF THE 1285 AVENUE OF THE CIK:1532799| IRS No.: 453587479 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 AMERICAS AMERICAS Type: FWP NEW YORK NY 10019 NEW YORK NY 10019 SIC: 6189 Asset-backed securities 212-713-2000 Copyright © 2019 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document FREE WRITING PROSPECTUS FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 433 REGISTRATION FILE NO.: 333-227784-04 Copyright © 2019 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document September 19, 2019 FREE WRITING PROSPECTUS STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET $807,336,117 (Approximate Total Mortgage Pool Balance) $698,345,000 (Approximate Offered Certificates) UBS 2019-C17 UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. Depositor UBS AG Wells Fargo Bank, National Association Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC Ladder Capital Finance LLC Rialto Real Estate Fund III Debt, LP CIBC Inc. Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers UBS Securities LLC Wells Fargo Securities Co-Lead Managers and Joint Bookrunners CIBC World Academy Bancroft Brean Capital Drexel Hamilton Markets Securities Capital, LLC Co-Managers The depositor has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) (SEC File No.
    [Show full text]
  • Timberworks Building 325 E Chicago Street Milwaukee, Wi 53202
    FOR LEASE TIMBERWORKS BUILDING 325 E CHICAGO STREET MILWAUKEE, WI 53202 Property Highlights Specifications Contact • Located in the heart of the Historic Third Ward AVAILABLE SPACE Suite 400: 6,983 SF Derek Yentz • Excellent highway access to I-94/794 and I-43 (Available 1/1/2021) 414.249.2321 [email protected] • Walking distance from countless retail, Gross Building Area 36,600 SF restaurants and entertainment options Year Built/Renovated 1913/1990 (blocks from Summerfest grounds) Stories 5 • Exposed brick and high-beamed ceilings Construction Masonry • Cafe on ground level Lease Rate $14.50/SF NNN Operating Expenses $8.25/SF (Est. 2020) 414.271.1111 | www.founders3.com Information shown herein was provided by Seller/Lessor and/or third parties and has not been verified by the broker unless otherwise indicated. FOR LEASE TIMBERWORKS BUILDING 325 E CHICAGO STREET MILWAUKEE, WI 53202 PROPERTY PHOTOS 414.271.1111 | www.founders3.com Information shown herein was provided by Seller/Lessor and/or third parties and has not been verified by the broker unless otherwise indicated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 m i l w a u k e e 3 3 3 E a s t C h i c a g o S t r e e t M i l w a u k e e, W i s c o n s i n 53202 D D t e l e p h o n e 414 . 271 . 5350 m a d i s o n 3 0 9 West Johnson Street, Suite 202 M a d i s o n, W i s c o n s i n 5 3 7 0 3 t e l e p h o n e 608 .
    [Show full text]
  • I-43 Purpose and Need
    I-43 North South Freeway Corridor Silver Spring Drive to WIS 60 Milwaukee and Ozaukee Counties, Wisconsin PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT WisDOT I.D. 1229-04-01 February 2013 I-43 NORTH-SOUTH FREEWAY CORRIDOR STUDY PURPOSE AND NEED – FEBRUARY 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT ............................................. 1 1.1 Project Location ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose of the Proposed Project ...................................................................................... 4 1.3 Need for the Proposed Action ........................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Pavement, Freeway Design and Geometric Deficiencies ................................................................. 4 1.3.2 Safety .............................................................................................................................................. 21 1.3.3 Existing and Future Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................... 28 1.3.4 Land Use and Transportation Planning .......................................................................................... 36 1.3.5 System Linkage and Route Importance .......................................................................................... 39 1.3.6 Environmental Aspects ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lanes Opening Where Possible for Labor Day Travel
    State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Illinois Department of Transportation Omer Osman, Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: Sept. 2, 2021 Paul Wappel 217.685.0082 Maria Castaneda 312.447.1919 Lanes opening where possible for Labor Day travel Non-emergency closures suspended, though active work zones across state SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Transportation announced today that lanes that have been closed for construction will reopen, where possible, for the Labor Day holiday to minimize travel disruption. Non-emergency closures will be suspended from 3 p.m. Friday, Sept. 3, to 12:01 a.m. Tuesday, Sept. 7. The following lane closures will remain in place during the holiday weekend. Motorists can expect delays and should allow extra time for trips through these areas. Drivers are urged to pay close attention to changed conditions and signs in the work zones, obey the posted speed limits, refrain from using mobile devices and stay alert for workers and equipment. At all times, please buckle up, put your phone down and drive sober District 1 Chicago • Northbound Pulaski Road between 76th and 77th streets; lane reductions continue. • Cicero Avenue (Illinois 50) between 67th and 71st streets; lane reductions continue. • The following ramps in the Jane Byrne Interchange work zone will remain closed: o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive to outbound Dan Ryan Expressway (Interstate 90/94); detour posted. o Inbound Kennedy (I-90/94) to Jackson Street. o Inbound Kennedy to Adams Street. o Outbound Kennedy from Adams Street. o Outbound Kennedy from Jackson Street. o Outbound Kennedy to Randolph Street. o Outbound Kennedy to Washington Street.
    [Show full text]