DOCSLIB.ORG

King of the Road Survey Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2016 KING OF THE ROAD SURVEY RESULTS 401 responses from Atlas van operators What is your level of satisfaction with being an across North America were received, Atlas van operator? representing at least 43 states in the (401 respondents) U.S. and six Canadian provinces. 38% Extremely satisfied – I love my job! 40% Reasonably satisfied – life’s good! 15% Somewhat satisfied – OK overall The Driver & The Job 7% Could be better What is the best part of being a van operator? (399 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) How likely are you to recommend joining 64% Meeting/Working with People Across the Country Atlas to friends or colleagues on the road? 60% Freedom of the Highway (Not Working in an Office) (400 respondents) 53% Entrepreneurship (Run Own Business) 80% Very Likely 23% Being a Part of the Trucking Community 14% Somewhat Likely 10% Other (sense of satisfaction/completion, helping people, travel, etc.) 9% Not Likely How long have you been a van operator with Atlas? What are you doing to be more eco-friendly while on the road? (401 respondents) (392 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) 18% Less than 1 year 58% Limiting unnecessary idling 22% 1-3 years 32% Use Prepass/EZ Pass/Best Pass 13% 4-6 years 32% Recycle aluminum, glass and plastic containers 9% 7-9 years 31% Use reusable drink containers 14% 10-15 years 26% Use APU 22% 16+ years or more 26% Use reusable grocery bags 24% Taking advantage of hotel conservation programs like How many weeks per year do you spend on the road? reusing towels (401 respondents) 18% Less than 20 weeks 22% Use driver assist apps 18% 20 to 30 weeks 15% Use generator 27% 31-40 weeks 13% Buying organic or locally grown foods 37% More than 40 weeks 13% Use Biodiesel fuel 11% Use aerodynamic skirts How many miles per year do you normally drive your truck? 9% Use IdleAir or other TSE (400 respondents) 7% Use battery operated HVAC (i.e. ParkSmart, etc.) 20% Less than 50,000 2% Hypermiling/eco-driving 37% 50,000-74,999 3% Other 23% 75,000-99,999 13% 100,000-124,999 Okay, you're finally off the road. What's your 8% 125,000 or more favorite pastime when you're not working? (394 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) Why did you choose to join Atlas as a van operator? 77% Hang out with family/friends (400 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) 37% Have a relaxing dinner 42% Atlas Agency 28% Go on vacation 33% Family/friend influence 26% Spend time on a favorite hobby 36% Company reputation 26% Go hunting or fishing 25% Money/miles 25% Go to a movie 13% Advancement opportunities 20% No contest...sleep! 24% Driver respect 19% Go to a sporting event 10% Equipment 11% Other (golf, motorcycles, remodel home, concerts, boating, camping, cookin 19% Referral/recommendation gardening, scuba diving, surfing, snowboarding, running, hiking, sailing, etc.) 14% Home time 9% Other (fit, passion, work, support family, etc.) People & Things moved What are some of the most interesting types of Dodge Viper people you have assisted in moving? Elephant Statue (371 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) Entire Living Room of Cat Trees 63% Regular/Everyday People Extra Large Smoker (made from propane tank – over half the 39% Pro-Athletes trailehigh!) 35% Military Fantastic Four Car Prop 19% Actors/Actresses (TV/Movie/Stage) Farm Equipment 15% Scientists Ferrari 14% Singers/Musicians Full Size Doll House 9% Authors Furniture for Paul Newman’s Hole in the Wall Gang Camp 9% Politicians George Washington’s Teeth 6% Comedians Glider Aircraft 6% Religious Leaders Hammerhead Shark 3% International Leaders Helicopter 1% Business Executives Horse Buggy 9% Other (Doctors, Government Officials, Federal Law Enforcement Officers, Huge Church Organ Museum Curators, Movie Directors, Retirees, etc.) Indian Temple/Shrine Italian Pizza Oven Jewish Holocaust Exhibit What is the most interesting or most unique thing you’ve Joe Lewis Statue (heading to Florida) ever loaded onto your truck? (298 responses – many cite airplanes, boats, cars, helicopters, & medical John Deere Tractor with Front End Loader equipment - some of the most unique items listed below!) John Lennon Exhibition $1,000,000 Mitsubishi Prototype Automobile Kirby Puckett Personal Sports Memorabilia 1/10th Scale Train Station & Track Kubota Tractor 10 Person Hot Tub Lamborghini 12 Foot Giraffe Large Rock Crystal Formation 16 Foot Tractor with Bucket & Bushwhack Life-Size Working Model of Deep Submersible ROV for Museum 1932 Jaguar Maps Drawn by Christopher Columbus 1940 Motorcycle with Side Car MGM Sign 1942 German Motorcycle Movie Projector Machines 1950 Cadillac (Mint Condition) NFL Exhibit 1965 Corvette Dragster Nissan Z (signed by over 50 Grammy nominated musicians!) 1968 Mustang 500 GT Nuclear Camera 19th Century Asian Buffet & Vase Old Coca-Cola Machine 3 Wheel Harley Golf Cart Old Wagon 35 Foot Fiberglass Statue Part of Lunar Moon Rover 3600 lb. Antique Gun Safe Picasso 4 Wheel Homemade Bike (seats 4 people) Pirate Ship 7 Foot Tall Eagle Red Wing Pottery Collection (over 1,000 pieces!) 8 Foot Chicken Statue Ripley’s Believe It or Not Exhibit 9 Foot Tall Gold Plated Harp Rocket Nasals for Saturn 5 Rocket Museum Exhibits Andy Warhol Paintings Rolls Royce Silver Shadow Antique Phone Booth Rotating Fur Covered Clam Shell Bed Apollo 15 Items Sectional Chain Link Fencing for Entire Property Apollo Spacesuits Smithsonian Pieces Arizona Cardinals Training Equipment & Luggage Stage Scenes Aston Martin Studebaker Australian Tree Stump Subaru Prototype (handmade out of wood!) Baby Grand Piano Trike Customized by Chrome Shop Mafia Bar (made from a coffin!) Turf from Three Rivers Stadium in Pittsburgh, PA Big Playground Set University Science Department Equipment Boston Red Sox Golf Cart Wedding Arch (made out of tree branches & twigs) Bronze Statue for National Park Wells Fargo Stagecoach Castle Windmill Cessna 150 Aircraft Wooden Indian Children’s Museum X-Ray Machine Choir Stage Zoo Covered Wagon Creature from the Black Lagoon CT Scan Machine Dinosaurs/Dinosaur Exhibits Disney World Exhibits The Rig & Equipment Who builds the best tractor? (398 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) What electronic log devices (ELD)/telematics systems do you like best? What electronics/services to use 43% Kenworth (217 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) 31% Peterbilt 28% Freightliner 41% Rand McNally 26% Volvo 28% Omnitracs 10% I nternational 8% PeopleNet 7% Western Star 4% J.J. Keller 2% Mack 1% uDrove 3% Other (Mercedes, no preference, etc.) 1% Teletracs 1% Flexmatics Who makes the best tires? 1% Geotab 1% Zonar (398 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) 1% CarrierWeb 47% Michelin 1% NexTraq 37% Bridgestone 0% Cadec Global 26% Goodyear 0% VDO RoadLog 13% BF Goodrich 0% Telogis 12% Firestone 19% Other (Qualcomm, Cobra, Garmin, driversdailylog.com, etc.) 10% Yokohama 6% Continental Communications 3% Other (Samson, no preference, etc.) When on the road, which of the following do you use? (399 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) Which brand of motor oil do you use most often? 93% Smartphone (iPhone, Android, etc.) (401 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) 75% GPS 46% Shell Rotella 56% Tablet (iPad/Galaxy/etc.) 41% Mobil Delvac 53% Wi-Fi 12% Chevron Delo 38% Laptop 7% Valvoline 37% CB radio 4% Penzoil 9% Basic Cell phone 2% Castrol 7% IdleAir/Shore Power or other TSE 4% Other (NAPA, Lucas, Amzoil, Kendall, Synthetic, etc.) 3% E-Reader (Nook/Kindle/etc.) Generator Brand Used (Of Those Using Generators) Smartphone Type (Of Those Who Use Smartphones) (401 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) (367 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) 39% Cummins 57% Android 25% Kubota 45% Apple (iOS) 9% Onan 8% Windows 7% Generac 2% Other 4% Yamaha 4% Carrier Tablet Type (Of Those Who Use Tablets) 2% Alibaba (170 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) 21% Other (Cobra, Harbor Freight, Perkins, Rigmaster, etc.) 67% Apple (iOS) 36% Android TSE Brand Used (Among Those Who Use TSE) 5% Windows (35 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) 1% Other 83% IdleAir What cell service/wireless network provider do you use? 9% American Idle Reduction (401 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) 6% EnviroDock 6% Truck Star 46% Verizon 9% Other (Sure Power, Webasto, etc.) 24% AT&T 18% Sprint APU Brand Used (Of Those Using APU) 8% T-Mobile (94 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) 2% Metro PCS 2% Telus 45% ThermoKing TriPac 1% Bell 18% Carrier ComfortPro 1% Boost Mobile 9% Rigmaster 1% Cricket Wireless 7% Cummins/Onan 1% Straight Talk 2% HP2000 1% Rogers 20% Other (Centramatic, Dynasis, Power Tech, Ideal Solutions, 1% Other (Wind Mobile, Koodo, etc.) Fridgett, Proheat, etc.) When you are on the road how often 8% Christian do you have access to the following: 6% National Public Radio Email 9% Other (Metal, Spanish, Reggae, Easy Listening, Classic Rock, (397 respondents) Comedy, Salsa, Punk, Motown, Celtic, Classical, etc.) 94% Daily Restaurants, hotels & stops 2% 2-3 Times a Week Restaurants 2% Once a Week 0% 2-3 Times a Month What is your favorite fast food restaurant? 1% Once a Month (342 respondents - Exceeds 100% due to multiple responses) 1% Less than Once a Month 40% Subway 2% Never 29% Wendy's 28% Chick-Fil-A Internet 25% Taco Bell (380 respondents) 20% Chipotle 18% Kentucky Fried Chicken 93% Daily 17% Arby's 3% 2-3 Times a Week 16% McDonald's 3% Once a Week 16% Panera Bread 0% 2-3
Recommended publications
  • Directions to Mccormick.Indd

    Directions to Mccormick.Indd

    DIRECTIONS & ADDRESS TO: McCORMICK PLACE MARSHALLING AREA (3050 Moe Drive, Chicago, IL 60616) notes North of Chicago to McCormick Place: Interstate 90 (Kennedy Expressway) to Interstate 55 North. Take I-55 North until it ends. Bear right and EXIT at Lake Shore Drive South (41 south). Proceed approximately ½ mile and exit at 31st Street. Proceed up the exit ramp and bear right. Turn right at U-TURN BEFORE the stop light onto Moe Drive. If you went to the light you went too far. After making U- EXHIBITOR Turn go approximately ¼ of a mile to the fi rst stop sign. Turn left at the Stop sign and, YOU ARE THERE!!! West of Chicago to McCormick Place: Interstate 290 (Eisenhower Expressway) east to Interstate 94 (Dan Ryan Expressway). South on Interstate 94 (Dan Ryan Expressway) to Interstate 55 North. Take I-55 North until it ends. Bear right and EXIT at Lake Shore Drive South (41 south). Proceed approximately ½ mile and exit at 31st Street. Proceed up the exit ramp and bear right. Turn right at U-TURN BEFORE the stop light onto Moe Drive. If you went to the light you went too far. After making U-Turn go approximately ¼ of a mile to the fi rst stop sign. Turn left at the Stop sign and, YOU ARE THERE!!! Southwest of Chicago to McCormick Place: Interstate 55 North until it ends. Bear right and EXIT at Lake Shore Drive South (41 south). Proceed approximately ½ mile and exit at 31st Street. Proceed up the exit ramp and bear right. Turn right at U-TURN BEFORE the stop light onto Moe Drive.
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx

    Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx

    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide

    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide

    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
  • Klickitat County Regional Transportation Plan, Amended

    Klickitat County Regional Transportation Plan, Amended

    Klickitat County Regional Transportation Plan Updated: May 2009 Amended: February 2012 Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council KLICKITAT COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Updated: May 2009 Amended: February 2012 Prepared by: Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council PO Box 1366 Vancouver, WA 98666-1366 (360) 397-6067 February 2012 Amendment Page ii: List of amendment RTP changes. Page vi: The Klickitat County Transportation Policy Committee Members were updated to reflect current committee members. Page 12: The Growth in Klickitat County section was updated to reflect 2010 demographics including population, housing units and BEA employment data. Page 22: Update Bridge section to reflect the completion of the Type, Size, and Location phase of the SR-35 Columbia River Crossing project. Page 26: Update to show change to Dock Grade Road, moving to one-way uphill with no trucks. Pages 37-40: Updated Chapter 5 to reflect updated System Improvement Needs. Improvement Needs updates include: 1) Remove SR-142 Bowman Grade Project (completed), 2) revised Bingen Point Access project description, and 3) add SR-197/Dock Road intersection improvement. Page 43: Updated RTP Update Process section to reflect the 2012 Update elements and next anticipated update to the RTP. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Title Page ...................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................
  • Interchange Modification Report

    Interchange Modification Report

    I-26 / Naval Base Terminal Access Road Interchange INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT CHARLESTON COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared for: South Carolina Department of Transportation Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. May 2012 I-26ȀPortAccessRoadInterchangeModificationReport TABLEOFCONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Project Location.................................................................................................................................................. 3 Project History.................................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Description ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Project Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................................. 9 Project Conceptual Design ................................................................................................................................ 11 Interchange Modification Report (IMR) Scope..................................................................................................
  • I-24 SMART CORRIDOR Leveraging Technology to Improve Safety and Mobility

    I-24 SMART CORRIDOR Leveraging Technology to Improve Safety and Mobility

    I-24 SMART CORRIDOR Leveraging Technology to Improve Safety and Mobility Brad Freeze, Director, Traffic Operations Division, TDOT The Need • Interstate 24 (I-24) is a integral part of the Nashville transportation network and a major route for commuters and freight. • Traffic volumes along the I-24 corridor have experienced exponential growth rates over the past decade. Since 2005, traffic volumes have increased more than 60% on I-24 near Murfreesboro. • Currently, peak hour volumes exceed capacity and even a minor incident can have a severe impact on travel time reliability. • Due to physical, environmental, and financial constraints along the Corridor there are no viable, short term roadway widening projects. Area Map I-24 Congestion Contributors Traffic Incidents 27% Incidents Breakdown 2015 Contributors to Congestion (Total Crashes:1,661) Crash History & Analysis I-24 Section Crash Rate Crash Rate Data represents information collected between 2013-2015 System Performance Review AM Peak Period Travel Time I-24 From I-840 to Briley Pkwy. 85 High Variability 75 65 55 Travel Time 95th Percentile 45 Average Travel Time Travel Time (min) Time Travel 35 25 15 Reliability From Exit 78 (SR-96) & Exit 53 (I-440 Interchange), 25 miles Westbound Travel (Weekdays 2014-2016) Buffer time (minutes) Planning time (minutes) Travel time (minutes) 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 39.64 3.59 69.32 30.14 36 27.94 43.98 4.48 73.64 31.04 37.3 27.57 43.57 4.63 73.22 31.18 37.59 27.32 Eastbound Travel (Weekdays 2014-2016) Buffer time (minutes) Planning time (minutes) Travel time (minutes) 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 2.76 19.18 27.22 45.71 24.93 30.63 2.86 22.16 27.31 48.69 24.97 32.53 1.97 25.85 26.43 52.38 24.46 33.92 2014 User Costs 2015 2016 Previous Studies I-24 Multimodal Corridor Study • Identified short- and long-term solutions for improving problem spots along the entire corridor.
  • White Salmon Planning Commission Meeting AGENDA February 24, 2021

    White Salmon Planning Commission Meeting AGENDA February 24, 2021

    White Salmon Planning Commission Meeting AGENDA February 24, 2021 – 5:30 PM Via Zoom Teleconference Meeting ID: 840 1289 8223 Passcode: 623377 Call in Numbers: 669-900-6833 929-205-6099 301-715-8592 346-248-7799 253-215-8782 312-626-6799 We ask that the audience call in instead of videoing in or turn off your camera, so video does not show during the meeting to prevent disruption. Thank you. Call to Order/Roll Call Public Comment – Draft Elements 1. Public comment will not be taken during the teleconference. Public comment submitted by email to Jan Brending at [email protected] by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 24, 2021 will be read during the planning commission meeting and forwarded to all planning commissioners. Please include in the subject line "Public Comment - February 24, 2021 - Planning Commission Meeting." Please indicate whether you live in or outside of the city limits of White Salmon. Discussion Items 2. Presentation and Discussion of Draft Elements a. History and Historic Places b. Transportation c. Public Facilities and Services d. Capital Improvement Program 3. Comprehensive Plan Update Workshop a. Environmental Quality and Critical Areas Element b. Economics Element c. Parks and Recreation Element d. HIstory and Historic Places Element (if time allows) Adjournment 1 File Attachments for Item: 2. Presentation and Discussion of Draft Elements a. HIstory and HIstoric Places b. Transportation c. Public Facilities and Services d. Capital Improvement Program 2 II. HISTORY AND HISTORIC PLACES Background Context and History Environmental context The City of White Salmon lies in a transition zone between the maritime climate west of the Cascade Mountain Range and the dry continental climate of the inter-mountain region to the east.
  • Proposed Improvement of Interstate 80/94

    Proposed Improvement of Interstate 80/94

    Proposed Improvement of Interstate 80/94 Interstate 294 to U.S. Route 41 (Calumet Avenue) Cook County, Illinois Lake County, Indiana T.H.E. Conference – University of Illinois February 24, 2004 Regional Map Project Dates • July 1995 – Project Initiated • May 1999 – Funding Announced through Illinois FIRST • September 2001 – Begin Phase II Design • November 2001 – Public Hearing • June 2003 – Design Approval • August 2003 – First of Over 25 Contract Awards Project Location Traffic Volumes Current: 130,000 - 159,000 Vehicles per Day Projected 2020: 164,000 - 192,000 Vehicles per Day 27 % Multi-Unit Trucks Needs Identified • Improve Highway Safety • Improve Mobility • Improve the Configuration and Condition of the Roadway Project Overview EB I-80 to NB I-94 I-80/I-94 Junction WB I-80/94 Split WB I-80 Under Capacity Torrence Ave Interchange BERNICE ROAD 176th PLACE Proposed Features • Proposed Improvement Plan – Complete Reconstruction – Four Continuous Through Traffic Lanes in Each Direction – Auxiliary Lanes for Entrance and Exit Maneuvers – Drainage System – Elimination of 2 Pump Stations – Noise Abatement Walls – Roadway Lighting Origin-Destination Study – 354267 % of westboundeastboundtraffic is through traffictraffic traffic exitingfrom Torrencecontinuing at Torrence Avenue east- Avenuecontinueswest along comes west Interstate onfrom Interstate Interstate 80 80 94 I-80/I-94/IL 394 Interchange Flyover to I-94 4 Through Lanes To Torrence Ave Flyover to IL 394 I-80/94 Reconfiguration I-80 I-94 / IL 394 4 Through Lanes I-94 IL 394 To Torrence
  • I-294/I-57 Interchange Cook County, Illinois

    I-294/I-57 Interchange Cook County, Illinois

    I-294/I-57 INTERCHANGE COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM Proposed 147th Street Improvements - Kedzie Avenue to Western Avenue/Dixie Highway I-57/I-294 Interchange - Minor Updates Based on New Environmental Studies FEBRUARY 2009 I-294/I-57 EA Addendum TABLE OF CONTENTS Background and History............................................................................................. 1 Environmental Assessment Addendum..................................................................... 3 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED......................................................................................... 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 3 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................. 5 2.3 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED IN DETAIL........................................................ 5 2.3.2 Preferred Alternative..................................................................... 5 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 3.1 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS .......................................................... 5 3.1.1 Social and Economic Affected Environment............................... 6 3.1.1.12 Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Facilities........................... 6 3.1.2 Social and Economic Environmental Consequences.................... 6 3.2 FARMLAND ...................................................................................................7 3.3 AIR QUALITY...............................................................................................
  • Construction Suspended Where Possible for July 4

    Construction Suspended Where Possible for July 4

    State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Illinois Department of Transportation Omer Osman, Acting Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: July 1, 2020 Paul Wappel 217.685.0082 Maria Castaneda 312.447.1919 Construction suspended where possible for July 4 Non-emergency closures called off, but motorists should still expect work zones SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Transportation announced today that lanes that have been closed for construction will reopen, where possible, for the Fourth of July holiday to minimize travel disruption. Non-emergency closures will be suspended from 3 p.m. July 2 to 11:59 p.m. July 5. The following lane closures will remain in place during the holiday weekend. Work zone speed limits will remain in effect where posted. Please buckle up, put your phone down and drive sober. District 1 City of Chicago: • The following ramps in the Jane Byrne Interchange work zone will remain closed: • o Inbound Kennedy (Interstate 90/94) Expressway exit to inbound Ida B. Wells Drive. o Outbound Dan Ryan Expressway exit to Taylor Street and Roosevelt Road. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive entrance from Canal Street. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Dan Ryan. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Kennedy. o Inbound Eisenhower Expressway (Interstate -290) to outbound Kennedy; detour with U-turn posted. o Inbound Eisenhower; lane reductions continue. o Inbound Ida B. Wells Drive; lane reductions continue. • Outbound Kennedy exit at Canfield Road; closed. • Westbound Bryn Mawr Avenue between Harlem and Oriole avenues; lane reductions continue. • Westbound Higgins Avenue between Oriole and Canfield avenues; lane reductions continue.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000

    Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000

    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
  • Appendix 2 - Existing

    Appendix 2 - Existing

    I-66 CORRIDOR STUDY WESTERN KENTUCKY TO MISSOURI BALLARD / MCCRACKEN COUNTY - ITEM # 1-23.00 APPENDIX 2 - EXISTING Prepared for Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) – Division of Planning Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) – District 1 Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. In Association With: Qk4 Third Rock Consultants, LLC Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. Fuller, Mossbarger, Scott & May FEBRUARY 2005 I-66 Corridor Study Western Kentucky to Missouri Existing Conditions Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Purpose..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Study Area Characteristics.................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Kentucky........................................................................................................ 2 1.2.2 Missouri......................................................................................................... 3 2.0 SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILE................................................................................ 5 2.1 Population ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Employment ........................................................................................................ 6 2.3 Economics..........................................................................................................