DOCSLIB.ORG

Nord Stream 2 – a Political and Economic Contextualisation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nord Stream 2 – a Political and Economic Contextualisation SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Kai-Olaf Lang and Kirsten Westphal Nord Stream 2 – A Political and Economic Contextualisation RP 3 March 2017 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2017 SWP Research Papers are peer reviewed by senior researchers and the execu- tive board of the Institute. They reflect the views of the author(s). SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3­4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by Meredith Dale (Updated English version of SWP-Studie 21/2016) The translation of this paper was funded by the German Foreign Office. Table of Contents 5 Issues and Recommendations 7 Nord Stream 2 – A Commercial Project with Political Dimensions 9 Nord Stream 2 as a Business Project 9 The commercial logic of Nord Stream 2 AG from the Western business perspective 9 Gazprom’s calculation 12 Nord Stream 2 and Regulation in the EU’s Internal Market 12 The legal framework in the internal market 12 Nord Stream 2 – Legal approaches and contested issues 17 The connecting pipelines for Nord Stream 2 19 Market Trends, Market (Power) Relations and Security of Supply 19 Nord Stream 2 and the gas supply in north- western Europe 19 Nord Stream 2: Price trends and liquidity 20 Transit through Ukraine and unresolved problems 22 The gas markets in central eastern Europe 24 Nord Stream and changing gas flows in eastern Europe 26 Nord Stream 2 – The Political Dimension 26 Nord Stream 2 and the strategic energy triangle 27 Nord Stream 2 in the context of climate and environmental considerations 28 Criticisms from central eastern and south-eastern Europe 29 Interests of individual member states 35 Summary and Outlook 38 Recommendations for Germany and the European Union 39 Abbreviations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang is Senior Fellow in SWP’s EU / Europe Division Dr. Kirsten Westphal is Senior Associate in SWP’s Global Issues Division Issues and Recommendations Nord Stream 2 – A Political and Economic Contextualisation The plans to add another pair of pipes to the Nord Stream facility under the Baltic Sea have created waves within the European Union. While the Russian energy giant Gazprom and the project’s European supporters argue that Nord Stream 2 and its new direct connections between Russian gas fields and the EU energy markets will improve Europe’s energy security, the Commission and certain member states are sceptical. Their worries include further expansion of Gazprom’s dominant position in the EU markets and a weakening of the current transit countries, which could potentially completely lose their function of conveying Russian gas to central and western Europe. Above all in the eastern parts of the EU, there are also concerns that the project could negatively impact the region’s own security of supply and have political repercussions in the form of a revitalisation of Ger- man-Russian cooperation, with European and foreign policy reverberations well beyond the energy sector. One major point to be emphasised is that setting the planning and construction process in motion on the basis of a commercial venture entails a clear and given application and permission procedure based on law and regulation. Nevertheless, the pipeline is a politically highly charged issue. Notwithstanding, the subsequent legal processes should not be intermingled with the political dimension. The intense debates over the pipeline project unfold in a multi-dimensional context. For the EU, the Nord Stream 2 discussion raises the question whether – assuming the pipeline is built – it will be able to pass a three-fold consistency and coherence test: firstly in connection with the rules for the internal energy mar- ket, which should be neither watered down nor bent for political reasons; secondly in terms of its foreign policy and security objectives, concretely towards Ukraine, which should not be undermined by energy policy decisions; and thirdly, in relation to its internal cohesion, which Nord Stream 2 could erode: politically if the rifts between member states over policy on Russia and energy widen, and economically because the pipeline project could lead member states to con- centrate more strongly on national energy policy and above all energy security policy, thus exacerbating market fragmentation. SWP Berlin Nord Stream 2 March 2017 5 Issues and Recommendations On the one hand, Nord Stream 2 could serve to scrutiny, even if it were framed as a “Nord Stream 2 restore space and prospects for shared interests after exit deal”. They would also revise their to date largely the dramatic worsening of EU-Russia relations caused positive perception of the role of the European by the crisis over Ukraine in 2014. On the other, one Commission. cannot ignore the geopolitical dimensions of the proj- If Nord Stream 2 does not come into operation as ect, which is designed to obviate the need for transit planned, the problem of east-west transit and the through Ukraine. Moreover, the idea of building an- question of the security and reliability of the Ukrain- other pipeline through the Baltic is a political live ian transport corridor remains pressing. The resusci- wire. Opponents argue that the project makes a tation of TurkStream also has implications for tran- mockery of the Energy Union and contradicts all its sit volumes. A reconciliation of interests between objectives. So the pipeline plan involves significant the EU and Russia should be trilateral, including political costs whether it fails or succeeds. Nord Stream Ukraine, and be negotiated with the participation is a commercial venture, but its impacts transcend of the affected member states. A compromise its commercial and energy implications. Without a should be sought that permits Russia and north- question, the project represents a challenge for energy western Europe to expand their direct gas links diplomacy both internal and external. through the Baltic, but at the same time preserves While the German government rightly emphasises transit of a defined gas volume through Ukraine the project’s commercial character, it has also backed as a flexibility option. Only on the basis of such a it for reasons of gas supply security. Germany is the minimum consensus can an attractive business landfall state in terms of existing law and regulation. model for the Ukrainian transit corridor be found. From a German perspective it is particularly impor- In any case the EU and its member states should tant to argue the benefits for the European gas market continue their efforts to encourage stabilisation as a whole and to dispel myths. Concerns that a bi- in Ukraine’s energy policy and supply (above and lateral monopoly could emerge are unfounded, as beyond the gas sector) in the scope of the Energy the German gas market is fully liberalised with open Community. competition. Germany must foster confidence (among The argument that Nord Stream 2 will divide the its neighbours) in its competition authorities and markets is misleading, as the EU gas markets are scrupulously monitor shifts in markets and market already divided due to an uneven implementation power. At the same time, the potential costs for Euro- of the third internal market package. The energy pean and bilateral relations must be closely observed supply situation and market conditions in central and where possible reduced. To that end Germany eastern and south-eastern Europe need rapid mar- could conduct a structured multilateral energy dia- ket reforms and improvement. Alongside full im- logue with its central eastern European neighbours, plementation of the third internal market package, with the aim of reconciling the different interests in this would include calculating the consequences the process of developing the Energy Union. The sym- of possible changes in Russian gas routing for states bolic nature of the project should not be stacked any in this region and supporting the affected countries higher, but its political implications reflected and in making the necessary adjustments to their trans- accommodated in the Energy Union framework, in port infrastructure. order to avoid rifts with EU partners. None of the sides should have any interest in delay- Additionally, the aforementioned potentially ing the approval and construction process, as that divisive effects of the Nord Stream 2 project should would only prolong the uncertainty. Russia is keep- be reduced and inconsistencies avoided: ing its options open with TurkStream (and South The onshore connecting pipelines for Nord Stream Stream). These imponderables create particular dif- are subject to regulation under EU law. But the ficulties for network planning in central and south- offshore sections are currently a grey area, to the eastern Europe countries, whose energy systems are extent that Germany, the EU and Russia disagree extremely vulnerable. over which “regime” to apply. That also opens up opportunities for a broader settlement of conten- tious bilateral issues. The “Gazprom-sceptical” EU member states will certainly subject any compro- mise granting concessions to Gazprom to close SWP Berlin Nord Stream 2 March 2017 6 Nord Stream 2 – A Commercial Project with Political Dimensions The construction costs for adding two additional lines To comprehend the European dimensions of the to the Nord Stream pipeline system – increasing total project, one must trace the long routes followed by annual capacity by 55 billion cubic metres – are esti- Russian gas into the EU. It is no accident that OMV, mated at €8 to 10 billion. Realising the pipeline is the Shell and Engie have joined Uniper and Wintershall in explicit object of a project company set up in Septem- backing the project. Currently, gas from Nord Stream 1 ber 2015 in St Petersburg.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Economics of the Nord Stream Pipeline System
    The Economics of the Nord Stream Pipeline System Chi Kong Chyong, Pierre Noël and David M. Reiner September 2010 CWPE 1051 & EPRG 1026 The Economics of the Nord Stream Pipeline System EPRG Working Paper 1026 Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 1051 Chi Kong Chyong, Pierre Noёl and David M. Reiner Abstract We calculate the total cost of building Nord Stream and compare its levelised unit transportation cost with the existing options to transport Russian gas to western Europe. We find that the unit cost of shipping through Nord Stream is clearly lower than using the Ukrainian route and is only slightly above shipping through the Yamal-Europe pipeline. Using a large-scale gas simulation model we find a positive economic value for Nord Stream under various scenarios of demand for Russian gas in Europe. We disaggregate the value of Nord Stream into project economics (cost advantage), strategic value (impact on Ukraine’s transit fee) and security of supply value (insurance against disruption of the Ukrainian transit corridor). The economic fundamentals account for the bulk of Nord Stream’s positive value in all our scenarios. Keywords Nord Stream, Russia, Europe, Ukraine, Natural gas, Pipeline, Gazprom JEL Classification L95, H43, C63 Contact [email protected] Publication September 2010 EPRG WORKING PAPER Financial Support ESRC TSEC 3 www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk The Economics of the Nord Stream Pipeline System1 Chi Kong Chyong* Electricity Policy Research Group (EPRG), Judge Business School, University of Cambridge (PhD Candidate) Pierre Noёl EPRG, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge David M. Reiner EPRG, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Nord Stream Delivers Gas to Lubmin
    European gas grid gas European gas from Nord Stream is delivered to the the to delivered is Stream Nord from gas At the landfall facility in Lubmin, Germany, Germany, Lubmin, in facility landfall the At LUBMIN HEATH: European Mainland European High Tech AN ENERGY SITE A Connecting Nord the at Arrives Natural Gas Gas Natural for Quality In the context of the energy Hub on the strategy 2020 of Mecklenburg- Stream and Safety Western Pomerania, Lubmin developed into an energy hub German Coast with a range of energy sources Delivers More than 167 million standard cubic metres feeding electricity into the German (later: cubic metres) of natural gas can be distribution grid. The Lubmin landfall The Bovanenkovo oil and gas gas transport systems. Currently, condensate deposit is the main up to 36 billion cubic metres of processed in the receiving station in Lubmin facility is the logistical natural gas base for the Nord gas can flow through the OPAL every day. A sophisticated series of valves, filters, link between the Nord Gas to Lubmin DISMANTLING AND Stream Pipeline. Discovered and pipeline annually. This amount preheating, measuring and control facilities Stream Pipeline and CONSTRUCTION estimated gas reserves amount is enough to supply a third of ensure that the gas is of top quality, and the right the European gas to 4.9 trillion cubic meters which Germany with natural gas for a quantities are flowing to the connecting pipelines distribution grid. The makes the Bovanenkovo field a year. The pipeline runs south at the right pressure and temperature. In 1995, the Nord nuclear power natural gas that arrives reliable source of natural gas for from Lubmin to Brandov, in the plant in Lubmin was shut down.
    [Show full text]
  • Landfall: the Starting Point of the Pipelines
    from the Russian gas transportation system transportation gas Russian the from into the Nord Stream offshore pipelines pipelines offshore Stream Nord the into In Portovaya Bay, near Vyborg, gas is fed fed is gas Vyborg, near Bay, Portovaya In VYBORG – the Russian Coast Russian the Safe Operations Landfall: A TOWN AT A Connecting Hub Begins on on Begins THE CROSSROADS Gas Transport Transport Gas Start at The Starting Point OF CULTURES on the Russian Coast Portovaya Bay Vyborg is a Russian city with a 700-year history that still bears The Landfall facility through up to date diagnostics, adjusted in terms of pressure of the Pipelines the hallmarks of old Europe. Its maintenance and repair tech- and volume as well as temper- The initial section of the Nord Stream Pipelines on at Portovaya Bay in the Russian shore is vitally important to the safe narrow winding paved streets niques. The UGSS of Russia is ature, before being transported with low buildings and summer Russia is the logistical controlled round-the-clock by further. The OPAL pipeline links operation of the entire gas transport system. In cafés as well as its medieval link between the Uni- Gazprom’s Central Operations Nord Stream with the existing order to transport gas over a distance of 1,224 kilo- monuments create a special fied Gas Transport Sys- and Dispatching Department, European natural gas transport metres, a powerful compressor station is needed cosy atmosphere the year tem of Russia and the which ensures uninterrupted systems. It is capable of trans- to build sufficient pressure of nearly 220 bar.
    [Show full text]
  • Pigging Test Loops Safeguarding Life, Property and the Environment © Scanpix
    ISSUE 14 DECEMBER 2012 In-line with success: pigging test loops Safeguarding life, property and the environment © Scanpix ™ As the focus on pipeline safety increases, stricter regulations Synergi demand better solutions for integrity management. The pipeline landscape is tough. Vermeer is tougher. Pipeline Do you have control? In addition to full compliance, operators are also seeing the benefits of Responsible and systems that increase efficiency and extend the lifetime of ageing assets. Synergi Pipeline is a company-wide risk and integrity management system efficient integrity that improves pipeline safety and reliability, maximises availability and Vermeer is equipped to see you through from start to finish with the products and experience you need. extends operational lifetime. It features support for international codes, Choose from a range of powerful horizontal and tub grinders, and track trenchers. Break through with a full management extensive risk assessment capabilities, coupled with tools to support the lineup of horizontal directional drills and accessories, including maxi rigs, reclaimers and high-pressure mud pumps, entire integrity and risk management process. as well as the tooling you need to tackle challenging subterrain. And it’s all backed by unmatched Vermeer dealer support that’s onsite when you need it. Learn how you can benefit from using Synergi Pipeline. VERMEER.COM Vermeer and the Vermeer logo are trademarks of Vermeer Manufacturing Company in the United States and/or other countries. © 2012 Vermeer Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • The OPAL Exemption Decision: Past, Present, and Future
    January 2017 The OPAL Exemption Decision: past, present, and future OIES PAPER: NG 117 Katja Yafimava The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2017 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-077-1 ii January 2017: The OPAL Exemption Decision: past, present, and future Preface To the casual gas reader, the dispute over the use of OPAL pipeline capacity is an issue for regulatory experts. But nearly eight years after the first regulatory decision and more than five years after the pipeline started operating it seems extraordinary that the share of capacity that Gazprom can use (if not required by other parties) remains unresolved. Indeed as we entered 2017, the controversy became even greater with the Commission being sued by a member state for having attempted to resolve this long-running problem causing the case to be referred to the European Court of Justice (CJEU). How and why we arrived at this point are the questions Katja Yafimava’s paper is designed to answer. Few of us, if we have only followed the headlines of the OPAL story, will have appreciated the complexity of the (competition and energy) regulatory issues, and in particular the impact of the evolving capacity allocation framework and development of capacity auction platforms, on the different options for resolving the dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Transport Begins from the Lubmin Landfall Facility in Germany the Landfall Facility Is the Logistical Link Between Nord Stream and the European Gas Grid
    NEwSletter about ThE NaturalFacts gaS pIpEline THROUGH ThE baltic sea issue 20 / NovEmbEr 2011 The two lines of the Nord Stream pipeline system reach land at lubmin. at the landfall station, the natural gas is purified, measured, and if necessary adjusted to the proper temperature prior to transport. Gas transport Begins from the Lubmin Landfall Facility in Germany The landfall facility is the logistical link between Nord Stream and the European gas grid he landfall facility in lines also comes from the region into a gas transportation agree- Along its 470-kilometre route, the Lubmin is a hub of sorts, where the Yuzhno-Russkoye ment with OOO Gazprom Export pipeline runs through three Ger- t the actual switching gas field is located. It is the big- to book up to 55 bcm capacity man federal states, and crosses point of a cross-border project gest natural gas field developed annually. The pipelines will trans- a total of 172 roads, four high- that will contribute to a secure in Russia to date. Nord Stream port gas from the entry point in ways, 27 rail lines, and 39 bod- supply of energy to Europe for shareholders Gazprom, E.ON Russia to the exit point in Germa- ies of water. Since the gas loses decades. At the same time, the and Wintershall have a stake in ny, where the gas will be received pressure over the long route, it landfall facility is only a small part this gas field, where reserves by the connecting OPAL (Baltic is repressurised at a compres- of the puzzle in the entire frame- are estimated at 600 billion Sea Pipeline Link) and NEL (North sor station in Baruth, south of work of the onward transport of cubic metres (bcm).
    [Show full text]
  • Nord Stream 2 – a Political and Economic Contextualisation
    SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Kai-Olaf Lang and Kirsten Westphal Nord Stream 2 – A Political and Economic Contextualisation RP 3 March 2017 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2017 SWP Research Papers are peer reviewed by senior researchers and the execu- tive board of the Institute. They reflect the views of the author(s). SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3­4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by Meredith Dale (Updated English version of SWP-Studie 21/2016) The translation of this paper was funded by the German Foreign Office. Table of Contents 5 Issues and Recommendations 7 Nord Stream 2 – A Commercial Project with Political Dimensions 9 Nord Stream 2 as a Business Project 9 The commercial logic of Nord Stream 2 AG from the Western business perspective 9 Gazprom’s calculation 12 Nord Stream 2 and Regulation in the EU’s Internal Market 12 The legal framework in the internal market 12 Nord Stream 2 – Legal approaches and contested issues 17 The connecting pipelines for Nord Stream 2 19 Market Trends, Market (Power) Relations and Security of Supply 19 Nord Stream 2 and the gas supply in north- western Europe 19 Nord Stream 2: Price trends and liquidity 20 Transit through Ukraine and unresolved problems 22 The gas markets in central eastern Europe 24 Nord Stream and changing gas flows in eastern Europe 26 Nord Stream 2 – The Political Dimension 26 Nord Stream 2 and the strategic energy triangle 27 Nord Stream 2 in the context of climate and environmental considerations 28 Criticisms from central eastern and south-eastern Europe 29 Interests of individual member states 35 Summary and Outlook 38 Recommendations for Germany and the European Union 39 Abbreviations Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Building New Gas Transportation Infrastructure in the EU – What Are the Rules of the Game?
    July 2018 Building New Gas Transportation Infrastructure in the EU – what are the rules of the game? OIES PAPER: NG 134 Katja Yafimava The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2018 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-115-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784671150 i Acknowledgements Researching and writing this paper has been a challenge on many fronts – the complexity of the subject of EU regulation, its rapidly evolving nature, and its ongoing politicization, particularly as far as Russian gas pipelines are concerned. I was privileged to count on support and advice from Professor Jonathan Stern, a Distinguished Research Fellow on the OIES Natural Gas Research Programme, to whom I am extremely grateful for the time he spent on reading and commenting on this (very long) paper. I also thank everyone else who has lent their time and expertise in various ways. Special thanks go to Catherine Riches for her excellent editing which made this paper significantly more readable. I also thank Kate Teasdale for her administrative support. Responsibility for all the views expressed and all the conclusions reached is solely mine.
    [Show full text]
  • Longstanding Commitment and Efficient Partnership
    RUSSIA WINTERSHALL DEA LONGSTANDING COMMITMENT AND EFFICIENT PARTNERSHIP VersorgungssicherheitSecuring supplies by engaging durch Engagement direktdirectly an at der the Quelle source Russia is among the world’s most richly endowed countries when it comes to natural resources. About one fifth of all known natural gas reserves are situated in Russia, making it the country with the largest gas reserves worldwide. Russia is the biggest supplier of natural gas to the European Union and it also contains one of the largest oil reserves worldwide within its borders. For Wintershall Dea, Europe’s leading independent natural gas and crude oil producer, Russia is a key core region in its portfolio and the region with the largest planned increase in production. Wintershall Dea is currently involved in several joint projects concerned with the exploration and production of hydrocarbons in Western Siberia and southern Russia. Together with our Russian partners, we are focusing on stable and long- term collaboration. Thanks to our ongoing exchange of experience and know-how, a model of partnership has emerged that has been supplying Europe with energy for more than 30 years. Factsheet Wintershall Dea February 2021 01 WINTERSHALL DEA | RUSSIA Successful collaboration in exploration & production Achimgaz, a joint venture between the Gazprom subsidiary Gazprom Dobycha Urengoy (50 per cent) and Wintershall Dea (50 per cent) was founded in 2003. It produces natural gas and condensate from the complex Achimov formations in Area 1A of the Urengoyskoye oil, gas and gas condensate field near Novy Urengoy, situated in West- ern Siberia, about 3,500 kilometres northeast of Moscow. Operating a large-scale facility for separating natural gas and con- densate with five processing lines, Achimgaz finalised the drilling campaign in 2019 with a total of 108 production wells, thus allowing The Achimgaz joint venture produces an annual production of about ten billion cubic metres* of natural around ten billion cubic metres* gas gas to be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Geopolitical Aspects of the Nord Stream 2 Gas Pipeline
    GEOECONOMICS AND GEOPOLITICS ECONOMIC AND GEOPOLITICAL ASPECTS OF THE NORD STREAM 2 GAS PIPELINE S. Z. Zhiznin a V. M. Timokhov b a MGIMO University, Received 27 February 2019 76, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, Russia, 119454 doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-3-2 b Centre for Energy Diplomacy and Geopolitics, 17, Gogolevsky Bulvar, Moscow, Russia, 119019 © Zhiznin S. Z., Timokhov V. M., 2019 The Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project (NS 2) along the bottom of the Baltic Sea is aimed to increase gas supply from Russia to Germany and other EU countries. It serves mutual economic interests: the predicted growth in gas demand in the EU markets and the need to strengthen the energy security of the EU. The implementa- tion of the NS 2 project is complicated by the need to allow for the EU energy legis- lation and by the expanding influence of geopolitical factors on EU — Russia coop- eration, including those stemming from the aggressive US energy diplomacy seeking to prevent the project from being successful and thus promoting the geopolitical interests of Washington. In this work, we aim to study the economic and geopolitical stances taken by the project’s supporters and opponents and to evaluate the pros- pects of NS 2. To this end, we carry out a factor analysis and employ the methods of economic, statistical and geopolitical analysis.We conclude that the project is high on the agenda of both EU-Russia economic relations and world politics. The project has good prospects despite counteraction from its geopolitical opponents. This is explained by it having a decided economic edge over alternative options for the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nord Stream, OPAL & Nel Pipelines and Europe´S Search For
    th 6 Pipeline Technology Conference 2011 The Nord Stream, OPAL & NEL Pipelines and Europe’s search for assured gas supplies Gas production in Europe is set to decline drastically in the next few years. It will be necessary to meet the resultant supply deficit by means of greater gas imports. In 2030 Europe will import approximately 70% of its energy needs. The major part of this imports will come from Russia, the world´s largest gas producer, to Europe , currently the biggest gas market worldwide. In March 2010 the European Commission announced a 1.390 million funds for over 30 gas projects - including pipelines. On April 7th 2010, the first pipes of the Nord Stream Project (Baltic Sea Pipeline) were laid offshore in the Baltic Sea. More than 100.000 pipes will be laid in two lines- each of them 11.134 km long - from Vyborg (Russia) to Lubmin (Germany), most of the distance offshore through the Baltic Sea. The first line will be brought on-stream 2011, the second parallel laid pipeline is due for completion in 2012. Most of the pipes for both lines will be supplied by EUROPIPE. On April 12th 2010 Nord Stream AG and EUROPIPE GmbH celebrated the loading of 1.000.000 t ( 93.000 pipes). The Baltic Sea Pipeline will establish a direct link between Russia´s vast gas reserves and the European gas transportation system and will deliver gas to Belgium, Netherlands, UK, Germany, Denmark, France and Czech Republic. The gas supply from Russia, starting in October 2011, will be distributed in Europe by two newly constructed pipelines - the OPAL pipeline (Baltic-Sea-Pipeline-Link) heading south from Greifswald/Germany through Mecklenburg, Brandenburg and Saxony to the Czech border, and the NEL Pipeline (North-German-Gas-Link) heading west via the Wingas storage plant at Rheden, to the Netherlands, and connecting the UK to the Russian gas sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet Russia
    FACTS & FIGURES RUSSIA LONGSTANDING COMMITMENT AND EFFICIENT PARTNERSHIP VersorgungssicherheitSecuring supplies by engaging durch Engagement direktdirectly an at der the Quelle source Russia is among the world’s most richly endowed countries when it comes to natural resources: about one fifth of all known natural gas reserves are situated in Russia. The country therefore has the largest gas reserves worldwide. Russia also lies in sixth place in the world oil rankings with more than 105 billion barrels of proven oil reserves*. Russia is the biggest supplier of natural gas to the European Union. For Wintershall Dea, Europe’s leading independent natural gas and crude oil producer, Russia is the key core region in its portfolio and the region with the largest planned increase in production. Wintershall Dea is currently involved in several joint projects concerned with the exploration and production of hydrocarbons in Western Siberia and southern Russia. Together with our Russian partners, we are focusing on stable and long- term collaboration. Thanks to our ongoing exchange of experience and know-how a model of partnership has emerged that has been supplying Europe with energy for nearly 30 years. * BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019 Factsheet Wintershall Dea March 2020 01 Successful collaboration in exploration & production Achimgaz, a joint venture between the Gazprom subsidiary Gazprom Dobycha Urengoy (50 per cent) and Wintershall Dea (50 per cent), celebrated its 15th anniversary in September 2018. The joint venture produces natural gas and condensate from the complex Achimov Formation in the Urengoy field (block 1A) in Novy Urengoy, situated in Western Siberia, about 3,500 kilometres northeast of Moscow.
    [Show full text]