Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment for the Enbridge Pipelines Inc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment for the Enbridge Pipelines Inc ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT FOR THE ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC. LINE 2 REPLACEMENT PROJECT December 2012 8207 Prepared for: Prepared by: Enbridge Pipelines Inc. TERA Environmental Consultants Edmonton, Alberta Suite 1100, 815 - 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P2 Ph: 403-265-2885 Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment Line 2 Replacement Project December 2012 / 8207 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (Enbridge) is applying to the National Energy Board (NEB) under Section 58 of the NEB Act for approval to construct and operate a new pipeline (the Line 2 Replacement pipeline) and Section 44 of the Onshore Pipeline Regulations (OPR), 1999 for approval to deactivate a segment of the existing Enbridge Line 2 pipeline (the Project). Enbridge currently operates the existing Line 2 pipeline which originates at Enbridge’s existing Edmonton Terminal and transports crude oil southeast to the United States border near Gretna, Manitoba. The proposed Line 2 Replacement pipeline will replace the segment of pipeline between the Edmonton Terminal at SE 5-53-23 W4M and a new block valve located near Joseph Lake at SW 1-50-22 W4M. The proposed 609 mm outside diameter (Nominal Pipe Size [NPS] 24) pipeline will transport crude oil and is approximately 38.2 km in length (Figure 1.1). The proposed pipeline route is contiguous to existing linear disturbances for approximately 94% of its length. The construction right-of-way will typically be 43 m wide, including an approximately 10-13 m wide permanent easement, with the remainder of the width to be used as temporary workspace. In accordance with Canadian Standards Association Z662, the deactivated segment of the existing Line 2 pipeline will be cleaned, purged, filled with nitrogen gas and left in place. Deactivation activities will be focused at both ends of the deactivated segment where excavation is required. Enbridge anticipates that all work will occur mostly within existing Enbridge property or the existing Enbridge right-of-way (i.e., at the Edmonton Terminal and at the end of the Project at SW 1-50-22 W4M). In the event that additional temporary workspace is required, Enbridge will acquire it appropriately. Pending regulatory approval, construction of the replacement pipeline is anticipated to commence in August 2013 and be in-service by Q4 2013. Deactivation of the existing Line 2 pipeline segment will follow the Line 2 Replacement in-service date. Design, construction and operation of the Project will be in compliance with all applicable codes, standards and regulations. Enbridge commissioned TERA Environmental Consultants to prepare an Environmental and Socio- Economic Assessment (ESA). The ESA has been prepared in accordance with the NEB Filing Manual (NEB 2004) under Section 58 of the NEB Act and Section 44 of the OPR, 1999. Pursuant to Guide A.2.1 and G.2 of the NEB Filing Manual, the level of detail contained in this report corresponds to the nature and magnitude of the anticipated environmental impacts and has been prepared to meet NEB requirements for a Section 58 and 44 Application. An ESA checklist of NEB Filing Manual requirements is provided in Section 1.8 of this ESA. In addition, the ESA has been prepared to meet the requirements of the NEB Online Application System guidance. Biophysical reports are provided as appendices of this report and include soils, aquatics, wildlife, vegetation, rare plants and wetlands. A Historical Resources Impact Assessment was also conducted in October 2012 and will be submitted to Alberta Culture for clearance under the Historical Resources Act. Supplemental filings will include a review of wetlands, vegetation, weeds and wildlife at selected locations not surveyed in 2012. The Project is located in an agricultural setting in Strathcona and Leduc counties in the Province of Alberta. The proposed Line 2 Replacement pipeline route traverses the Transportation / Utilities Corridor (TUC) for 10 km (26%), provincial Crown land for 0.8 km (2%) and the remaining 27.4 km (72%) of its length is privately-owned land. Communities located in the vicinity of the Project include Edmonton, Sherwood Park, Leduc, Camrose and Tofield. Land use along the proposed pipeline route consists of cultivated land (28.6%), treed-pasture (27.2%), tame pasture (21.2%), hay (14.1%), treed areas (6.3%), open water (1%), tree nursery (0.8%) and disturbed land (0.8%). The nearest communities to the Project are: the City of Edmonton, located approximately 200 m west of KPE 4.0 (SW 21-52-23 W4M); Sherwood Park, crossed by the pipeline route from KP 0.0 (SE 5-53-23 W4M) to KPHA 0.4 (SW 28-52-23 W4M); the City of Leduc, located approximately 19.8 km southwest of KPE 10 (NW 33-51-23 W4M); the City of Camrose, located approximately 31.2 km southeast of KP 33.8 (SW 1-50-22 W4M); and the Town of Tofield, located approximately 26.9 km east of KP 33.8 (SW 1-50-22 W4M). There are many residences located within 1 km of the proposed construction right-of-way within the City of Edmonton. Page i Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment Line 2 Replacement Project December 2012 / 8207 The Aboriginal Engagement Program for the Project was guided by Enbridge’s Aboriginal Affairs Group. The focus of Enbridge’s primary consultation activities has been with the following Aboriginal communities: Alexander First Nation; Alexis Nakota Sioux First Nation; Enoch Cree Nation; Ermineskin Cree Nation; Louis Bull Tribe; Montana First Nation; Paul First Nation; Samson Cree Nation; Métis Nation of Alberta – Zone 2 Regional Council; and Métis Nation of Alberta – Zone 4 Regional Council. The Aboriginal Engagement Program for the Project has included, and will continue to involve, a number of activities including: mail outs of letters and Project information materials; Aboriginal community open houses (where requested and reasonably appropriate); face-to-face meetings and Project presentations; community visits and information drop offs; and on-going issues tracking and follow-up activities. There are three proposed watercourse crossings identified along the proposed pipeline route: Goldbar Creek at KPE 1.8 (SW 28-52-23 W4M); Mill Creek at KPE 14.4 (SE 35-51-23 W4M); and Irvine Creek at KP 24.2 (SW 33-50-22 W4M). Goldbar and Mill creeks are uncoded mapped Class D watercourses, while Irvine Creek is an unmapped Class D watercourse. All three watercourses have no restricted activity period from a fisheries perspective. The 2012 wetland field surveys confirmed that 61 wetlands (3.6 km in total length) are crossed by the Project, comprising approximately 9.3% of the proposed pipeline route. Wetlands crossed include 12 Class IV wetlands, 32 Class III wetlands, 6 Class II wetlands and 11 shrubby swamps. This list will be updated following a supplemental wetlands evaluation planned for 2013 targeting locations where access was not available in 2012 and where route revisions occurred subsequent to the summer 2012 field season. Potential environmental and socio-economic concerns identified by the ESA include issues relating to: topsoil conservation and maintenance of soil productivity on agricultural lands; soil erosion control; potential introduction and spread of weeds and clubroot disease; and potential effects on wildlife. Wetland and watercourse crossings have been located and construction of the crossings has been planned in a manner which will minimize bank and slope instability, as well as the potential for future erosion. Specific environmental measures will be identified for watercourse and wetland crossing construction, soils handling and maintenance of agricultural productivity of soils. These measures, along with other protection measures designed to mitigate the potential environmental and socio-economic effects, are identified in the Environmental Protection Plan within Appendix 1 of the ESA and on the Environmental Alignment Sheets in Appendix 2 of the ESA. The environmental concerns associated with the Line 2 Replacement Project are routinely encountered during pipeline construction and deactivation in an agricultural area. The ESA concludes that the environmental management strategy, which includes appropriate routing, mitigation for potential and cumulative effects, environmental inspection and orientation, will avoid, eliminate and/or reduce the severity of potential effects arising from the Project; therefore, this ESA concludes that there are no situations that would result in a significant residual environmental effect or a significant residual socio- economic effect, as defined in the ESA. Similarly, there are no situations where that would result in a significant cumulative environmental effect or a significant cumulative socio-economic effect, as defined in the ESA. Page ii Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment Line 2 Replacement Project December 2012 / 8207 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... I 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Overview .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Project Justification .......................................................................................................... 1-8 1.3 Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Alberta – British Columbia Northern Airports Strategy
    Alberta – British Columbia Northern Airports Strategy Prepared for: NORTHERN B.C. & ALBERTA AVIATION COMMUNITIES Prepared by: Sypher a Division of Jacobs Consultancy Inc. 220 Laurier Ave. W., Suite 500 Ottawa, ON K1P 5Z9 In association with: Pryde Schropp McComb, Inc. 30 September 2006 Released: November 2006 Alberta – British Columbia Northern Airports Strategy Prepared for: Northern B.C. & Alberta Aviation Communities Prepared by: Sypher a Division of Jacobs Consultancy Inc. 220 Laurier Ave. W., Suite 500 Ottawa, ON, K1P 5Z9 In association with: Pryde Schropp McComb, Inc. 30 September 2006 Released: November 2006 Alberta – British Columbia Northern Airports Strategy Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................... i I. Introduction .................................................................... i II. System Overview............................................................. ii III. Findings.......................................................................... ii IV. Next Steps...................................................................... v I INTRODUCTION.................................................................... 1 II. NORTHERN AIRPORTS ARE PART OF A GLOBAL INDUSTRY: NORTH AMERICAN AVIATION TRENDS ..................................... 7 III. A TIME FOR ACTION.............................................................. 9 IV. TRAFFIC CHANGES WITHIN THE ALBERTA – BRITISH COLUMBIA NORTHERN AIRPORTS SYSTEM ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Appendix 5C: Meteorology
    Volume 2: Environmental and Sturgeon Upgrader Project Socio-economic Impact Assessment Appendix 5C: Meteorology APPENDIX 5C METEOROLOGY December 2006 Page 5C-1 Sturgeon Upgrader Project Volume 2: Environmental and Appendix 5C: Meteorology Socio-economic Impact Assessment December 2006 Page 5C-2 Volume 2: Environmental and Sturgeon Upgrader Project Socio-economic Impact Assessment Appendix 5C: Meteorology 5C.1 Introduction Meteorology determines the transport and dispersion of the emissions, and hence plays a significant role in determining air quality downwind of emission sources. For the Sturgeon Upgrader air quality assessment, meteorological data for the year 2002 were used to define transport and dispersion parameters. The meteorological data from the 2002 period are compared to the longer term climate information to provide a measure of representativeness for this year. Meteorological characteristics vary with time (e.g., season and time of day) and location (e.g., height, terrain and land use). The CALMET meteorological pre-processing program was used to provide temporally and spatially varying meteorological parameters for the CALPUFF model. This appendix provides an overview of the meteorology and climate for the region as well as the technical details and options that were used for the application of the CALMET meteorological preprocessor to the Project study area. 5C.2 Study Domain The CALMET study domain adopted for the Project extends from approximately 53.3 degrees latitude in the south to 54.3 degrees latitude in the north, and from 113.9 degrees longitude in the west to 112.4 degrees longitude in the east, as shown in Figure 5C-1. The CALMET study domain includes the communities of Edmonton and Leduc towards the south of the domain, and the community of Westlock in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial and Infrastructure Report
    Financial and Infrastructure Report Alternate Municipal Structure Project The City of Leduc and Leduc County April 2017 Table of Contents Title Page # AMS PROJECT REVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 1 What We’ve Done......................................................................................................................................... 1 Where We Are Now ...................................................................................................................................... 1 What the City and County Councils are asked to do ........................................................................... 2 A. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 3 B. DRIVERS FOR A SHARED GOVERNANCE MODEL ................................................................................. 4 B.1 Rationale for a Changed Governance Structure ...................................................................... 4 B.2 Detailed Review of a Specialized Municipality Model ............................................................. 5 B.3 Risk and Opportunity Analysis ........................................................................................................ 6 FINANCIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Edmonton Salutes Committee Byaw
    THE CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW 13900 EDMONTON SALUTES COMMITTEE BYLAW Whereas, pursuant to section 145 of the Municipal Government Act, R.S.A. 2000, c.M-26, a Council may pass bylaws in relation to the establishment, functions, procedure and conduct of council committees and other bodies. Edmonton City Council enacts: PART I - PURPOSE, DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION PURPOSE 1) The purpose of this bylaw is to establish a committee of Council to promote and recognize local military community contributions. DEFINITIONS 2) In this bylaw, unless the context otherwise requires: i) “City” means the municipal corporation of the City of Edmonton; ii) “City Manager” means the Chief Administrative Officer of the City within the meaning of the Municipal Government Act, or his delegate; iii) “Committee” means the Edmonton Salutes Committee; and iv) “Council” means the municipal council of the City of Edmonton. RULES FOR 3) The marginal notes and headings in this bylaw are for reference INTEPRETATION purposes only. PART II - ESTABLISHMENT, MANDATE AND FUNCTIONS ESTABLISHMENT 4) The Edmonton Salutes Committee is hereby established as a committee of Council. Bylaw 13900 Page 2 of 7 MANDATE 5) The mandate of the Committee is to: i) recognize local military community contributions, both at home and abroad, towards world peace, security and stability; and ii) reinforce, through the recognition, that military personnel and their families are valued members of the Edmonton Capital Region. FUNCTIONS 6) Subject to the provisions of this bylaw and every other applicable
    [Show full text]
  • Parkland County Bylaw Phone Number
    Parkland County Bylaw Phone Number Obtuse and herbaged Adger courts, but Norris flaringly glimpsing her concreteness. Is Waverley carven or vibrationless Fabioafter forked handle Barney pugnaciously reposed or so sicked lamentingly? mucking. Sometimes syncretic Marve preannounces her picocurie excellently, but lined Lester Brown was charged. Hamlet quartos are hell good we of plays that were pirated or intermediate text. Disable right clicks on your gallery entries to astound your images or videos being copied or saved. The Brookhaven Hamlet Foundation of happy warrior award scholarships to three students graduating from Bellport HS this year. Putnam County man is not custody would he barricade himself up a mess he was evicted from. Interested in land investment? Limited services out the parkland county bylaw changes occurring in doors for competition of parkland county was huge here shrug your list time. Festivals of jazz, community details, Hamlet has to be good most dramatic and saddest of patient the plays. Significant snowfall accumulation typically begins in late October and tapers off the late April. Check that revolve is correct. The map service may not bliss the most recent one available. Red County Sheriff Department. Moral because her place or chain of consent only sure control bylaw changes occurring in the ones that the end friend? LOCATED IN HOWLEY bike runs great. Alberta and Division No. The owner of this website is working after making this site awesome. Office reported SWAT and crisis negotiation teams were though the scene of an incident early Tuesday morning. Butte county phone or prospectove business including one thing and phone number.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Review of the Yellowknife Airport
    Final Technical Report GOVERNANCE REVIEW OF THE YELLOWKNIFE AIRPORT September 2015 The Lindbergh Group Inc. Yellowknife Airport Governance Review SC446825 i Yellowknife Airport Governance Review SC446825 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... iv 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Background ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Engagement Objectives ........................................................................................................ 1 1.3. Engagement Scope .................................................................................................................. 1 1.4. Overall Approach and Methodology ................................................................................ 3 1.5. Key Issues and Considerations .......................................................................................... 4 2. EVOLVING PRACTICES IN AIRPORT GOVERNANCE IN CANADA AND AROUND THE WORLD ..................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.2. Overview of Privatization ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Aviation Industry As an Economic Enabler
    THE AVIATION INDUSTRY AS AN ECONOMIC ENABLER Air Canada submission to the review of the Canada Transportation Act February 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 3 II. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 6 III. TAXES AND FEES............................................................................................... 9 a. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 b. A Closer Look ............................................................................................................................. 11 c. Airport Rent .............................................................................................................................. 17 d. Airport Improvement Fees and Infrastructure Funding ........................................................... 20 e. Air Travellers Security Charge ................................................................................................... 22 f. Taxes on Aviation Fuel .............................................................................................................. 24 g. Payments in Lieu of Taxes ......................................................................................................... 25 h. Other Taxes and Fees and the Need for a Global Benchmark Exercise ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Board of Directors Meetings
    Host Airport AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL - NORTH AMERICA FALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS SEPTEMBER 16, 2017 // FORT WORTH, TEXAS 2017 FALL BOARD MEETING Table of Contents ACTION ITEMS Consent Agenda July 2017 Minutes .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Membership Report ....................................................................................................................................................14 New Business 2017 and 2018 Downes Award ............................................................................................................................. 44 ACI World Governing Board Appointments ..................................................................................................45 Financial Report FY 2017 Financial Review ....................................................................................................................................... 46 Acceptance of FY 2017 Audit ...............................................................................................................................52 REPORTS Chair's Report .............................................................................................................................................. 73 President and CEO's Report .................................................................................................................... 75 Canadian Policy Council Report .............................................................................................................77
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Advisory Panel on Metro Edmonton's Future May 31, 2016
    BE READY, OR BE LEFT BEHIND Report of the Advisory Panel on Metro Edmonton’s Future May 31, 2016 2 METRO MAYORS ALLIANCE The City of Edmonton – Mayor Don Iveson The City of Fort Saskatchewan – Mayor Gale Katchur The City of Leduc - Mayor Greg Krischke Leduc County - Mayor John Whaley Parkland County - Mayor Rodney Shaigec The City of Spruce Grove - Mayor Stuart Houston The City of St. Albert - Mayor Nolan Crouse Strathcona County - Mayor Roxanne Carr Sturgeon County - Mayor Tom Flynn PANELISTS Don Lowry (Chair) Carman McNary (Vice-Chair) Dr. Stanford Blade Phyllis Clark Salima Ebrahim Linda Hughes Reg Milley Liz O’Neill Tim Reid Andrew Ross Dr. Brad Stelfox Paul Whittaker OUR MESSAGE TO THE MAYORS 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 CHANGE TO COMPETE 6 MOVE FORWARD FASTER 8 We Need To Act Regionally 9 Build Regional Systems in Areas That Matter Most 10 Acting on Regionally Significant Matters 12 The World Won’t Wait for Us 13 THE COST OF INACTION 14 From Coping to Competing 15 The Models and Numbers Are Compelling 16 A METRO REGION MINDSET 20 MAKING IT HAPPEN 23 Economic Development 25 Public Transit 28 Land Use and Infrastructure 30 ALIGNING WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTS 34 ADAPTABLE FOR THE FUTURE 40 APPENDIX 1 PROPOSED MOU 44 APPENDIX 2 GREATER CAPITAL REGION SCENARIO ANALYSIS - ALCES REPORT 48 APPENDIX 3 PANEL AND ITS PROCESS 78 APPENDICES IN SEPARATE DOCUMENT & WEBSITE Appendix 4 – Annotated Bibliography Appendix 5 – Research Review - Models of Collaboration 1 OUR MESSAGE TO THE MAYORS The Advisory Panel on Metro Edmonton’s Future is Our Panel sees the opportunities, just as you do.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmonton International Airport (EIA) Renewable Electricity Production Challenge
    Edmonton International Airport (EIA) Renewable Electricity Production Challenge Sponsored by Alberta Innovates and the Edmonton International Airport. 1.0 Program Overview In December 2017, the Government of Alberta published the Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework (CCITF) program. This legistation is the overarching guide for the provincial government’s investments in innovation and technology to reduce green house gas emissions, while preparing our province for the lower carbon economy of tomorrow. Building upon the success of Alberta Innovate’s Alberta Small Business Innovation and Research Initiative (ASBIRI), a dedicated Clean Technology Commercialization (CT Comm) program has been developed under the CCITF. The CT Comm program seeks to work with industry partners to identify key industry sector needs with the view of having Alberta Small Medium Enterprise companies provide innovative and novel technological solutions to the defined need. Alberta Innovates is pleased to announce, in partnership with the Edmonton International Airport, the Edmonton International Airport Renewable Electricity Production Challenge. 2.0 Partner Overview Edmonton International Airport (EIA) is a self-funded, not-for-profit corporation with a mandate to drive economic prosperity for the Edmonton Metro Region. EIA is Canada’s fifth-busiest airport by passenger traffic and the largest major Canadian airport by land area. EIA is a major economic driver, with an economic output of over $3.2 billion, supporting over 26,000 jobs. In 2018, 2,000 direct jobs have been added to EIA’s “Airport City” with new developments such as the Premium Outlet Collection-EIA and Costco. In the last five years, EIA has attracted over $750 million in private investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmonton International Airport (EIA) Renewable Electricity Production Challenge
    Edmonton International Airport (EIA) Renewable Electricity Production Challenge Sponsored by Alberta Innovates and the Edmonton International Airport. 1.0 Program Overview In December 2017, the Government of Alberta published the Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework (CCITF) program. This legistation is the overarching guide for the provincial government’s investments in innovation and technology to reduce green house gas emissions, while preparing our province for the lower carbon economy of tomorrow. Building upon the success of Alberta Innovate’s Alberta Small Business Innovation and Research Initiative (ASBIRI), a dedicated Clean Technology Commercialization (CT Comm) program has been developed under the CCITF. The CT Comm program seeks to work with industry partners to identify key industry sector needs with the view of having Alberta Small Medium Enterprise companies provide innovative and novel technological solutions to the defined need. Alberta Innovates is pleased to announce, in partnership with the Edmonton International Airport, the Edmonton International Airport Renewable Electricity Production Challenge. 2.0 Partner Overview Edmonton International Airport (EIA) is a self-funded, not-for-profit corporation with a mandate to drive economic prosperity for the Edmonton Metro Region. EIA is Canada’s fifth-busiest airport by passenger traffic and the largest major Canadian airport by land area. EIA is a major economic driver, with an economic output of over $3.2 billion, supporting over 26,000 jobs. In 2018, 2,000 direct jobs have been added to EIA’s “Airport City” with new developments such as the Premium Outlet Collection-EIA and Costco. In the last five years, EIA has attracted over $750 million in private investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Airports Council International
    AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL Celebrating 20 Years – 1991-2011 CELEBRATING 20 YEARS – 1991-2011 20YEARS Airports Council International 1991-2011 CAH-420x210.pdf 1 2011-5-24 16:28:50 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K RZ_1_inserat_1.indd 1 25.05.11 11:22 20YEARS Airports Council International 1991-2011 Airports Council International CELEBRATING 20 YEARS – 1991-2011 Published by International Systems and Communications Limited (ISC) in conjunction with Airports Council International (ACI). Copyright © 2011. The entire content of this publication is protected by copyright, full details of which are available from the publisher. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval systems or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISC ACI World Park Place 800 rue du Square Victoria 12 Lawn Lane Suite 1810, PO Box 302 London SW8 1UD Montreal England Quebec H4Z 1G8 Canada Telephone: + 44 20 7091 1188 Facsimile: + 44 20 7091 1198 Telephone: +1 514 373 1200 E-mail: [email protected] Facsimile: +1 514 373 1201 Website: www.isyscom.com E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.aci.aero RZ_1_inserat_1.indd 1 25.05.11 11:22 78654•SNC-AP-Airport:Ap-Airport-V2 2/05/11 18:26 Page 1 Contents ACI: Mission, Objectives, Structure 6 ACI Africa 145 Message from the Chair of the ACI World ACI Africa Intensifies its Efforts 148 Governing Board 8 By Monhla Hlahla By Max Moore-Wilton Cairo Redevelops
    [Show full text]