DOCSLIB.ORG

Role of Ape1 Acetylation in Fine Tuning Its Activity on Telomeric Regions”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Role of Ape1 Acetylation in Fine Tuning Its Activity on Telomeric Regions” Corso di dottorato di ricerca in Scienze biomediche e biotecnologiche Ciclo XXXI Titolo della tesi “Role of Ape1 acetylation in fine tuning its activity on telomeric regions” Dottoranda Supervisore Dott.ssa Silvia Burra Prof. Gianluca Tell Anno di discussione 2018-2019 Niente nella vita va temuto, dev’essere solamente compreso. Ora è tempo di comprendere di più, così possiamo temere di meno. Marie Curie 2 Summary Summary ........................................................................................................................... 3 1. Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 5 2. Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 6 3. Figures index ............................................................................................................. 7 4. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 9 4.1. Cancer cells features .......................................................................................... 9 4.2. Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway ............................................................. 11 4.3. Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (Ape1) ................................................ 12 4.4. Telomeres organization .................................................................................... 21 4.5. Ape1 role at the telomeres ................................................................................ 33 5. Aim of this study ..................................................................................................... 36 6. Results ..................................................................................................................... 37 6.1. Structural analysis of G4 sequences by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy 37 6.2. The 33-residue Ape1 N-terminus is required to stably bind telomeric G4 structures ..................................................................................................................... 40 6.3. The enzymatic activity of Ape1 on G4 telomeric structures is influenced by ionic strength and the N-terminus ............................................................................... 44 6.4. Acetylatable lysine residues in the Ape1 N-terminus are required for binding and enzymatic activity on G4 telomeric structures ..................................................... 53 6.5. Activity of Ape1 protein variants from U2OS cells ......................................... 56 6.6. The telomeric-binding ability of Ape1 depends on K27, K31, K32 and K35 residues ........................................................................................................................ 61 6.7. Interaction of NPM1 with Ape1 modulates its endonuclease activity on telomeric sequences .................................................................................................... 62 ........................................................................................................................................ 66 7. Discussion ................................................................................................................ 67 8. Future perspectives .................................................................................................. 72 9. Materials and Methods ............................................................................................ 74 9.1. Protein expression and FPLC purification ....................................................... 74 9.2. Oligonucleotides synthesis, purification and annealing ................................... 74 9.3. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy ............................................................. 75 9.4. SDS-PAGE and Western blotting .................................................................... 76 9.5. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) .................................................. 77 9.6. UV-crosslinking experiments ........................................................................... 77 3 9.7. Cell cultures, transfection and Co-immunoprecipitation ................................. 77 9.8. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and quantitative PCR ................................... 78 9.9. AP site incision assays ..................................................................................... 79 9.10. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) experiments ......................................... 80 9.11. Telomeric length assay ................................................................................. 80 9.12. GST pull-down assay ................................................................................... 80 9.13. Statistical analysis ........................................................................................ 81 10. References ............................................................................................................ 82 11. Published articles ............................................................................................... 101 12. Acknowledgements ............................................................................................ 102 4 1. Abstract One of the hallmarks of cancer is the loss of telomere stability. Unprotected telomeres are prone to aberrant end-joining reactions that lead to chromosomal fusions and translocations. Human telomeres are formed by the repeated TTAGGG sequence, in which the 3’ exposed strand may adopt a G-quadruplex (G4) structure. The guanine-rich regions of telomeres are hotspots for oxidation forming 8-oxoguanine, a lesion that is handled by the base excision repair (BER) pathway. One key player of this pathway is Ape1, the main human endonuclease processing abasic sites. Recent evidences showed an important role for Ape1 in telomeric physiology, but the molecular details regulating Ape1 enzymatic activities on G4 telomeric sequences are lacking. Through a combination of in vitro assays, we demonstrate that Ape1 can bind and process different G4 structures containing an abasic site analog (THF) in two different locations and that the interaction involves specific acetylatable lysine residues (i.e. K27/K31/K32/K35) present in the unstructured N-terminal domain of the protein. The cleavage of the abasic site located in a G4 structure by Ape1 depends on the DNA conformation or the position of the lesion and on electrostatic interactions between the protein and the nucleic acids. Moreover, Ape1 mutants mimicking the acetylated protein display increased cleavage activity for abasic sites. We found that nucleophosmin (NPM1), which binds the N-terminal domain of Ape1, plays a role in modulating telomere length and Ape1 activity at abasic G4 structures. Thus, the Ape1 N-domain is an important relay site for regulating the enzyme’s activity on G4-telomeric sequences, and specific acetylatable lysine residues constitute key regulatory sites of Ape1 enzymatic activity dynamics at telomeres. 5 2. Abbreviations ALT Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres AP Apurinic/apyrimidinic site Ape1 AP endonuclease 1 BER Base Excision Repair F Tetrahydrofuran G4 G-quadruplex OG 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroGuanine Lys Lysine nCaRE negative Calcium Responsive Element NPM1 Nucleophosmin 1 PTM Post-Translational Modification ROS Reactive Oxygen Species TERC Telomere RNA Component TERT Telomere Reverse Transcriptase TERRA Telomeric Repeat-containing RNA TRF Telomeric Repeat binding Factor 6 3. Figures index Figure 1 The hallmarks of cancer ............................................................................................... 9 Figure 2 Overview of different damaging agents, DNA effects and relative DNA repair pathways .................................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 3 Graphical representation of the main BER steps .................................................... 11 Figure 4 Structural organization of Ape1 protein .................................................................. 13 Figure 5 Cartoon representation of the Ape1-DNA complex ................................................. 14 Figure 6 Representation of the product of guanine oxidation ............................................... 17 Figure 7 Ape1 protein network ................................................................................................. 20 Figure 8 Representation of the chromosome ends protected by members of the shelterin complex ...................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 9 Representation of a planar tetrad ............................................................................. 25 Figure 10 Possible G-quadruplex structure conformations ................................................... 25 Figure 11 Mechanisms of telomerase-driven (A) and HR-driven (B) synthesis of telomeric DNA ............................................................................................................................................ 27 Figure 12 Protein interactome network of telomeric partners .............................................. 34 Figure 13 CD spectroscopy of the oligonucleotides used in this study .................................. 38 Figure 14 Schematic representations of G-quadruplex structures assumed by the oligonucleotides
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Looking at Earth: an Astronaut's Journey Induction Ceremony 2017
    american academy of arts & sciences winter 2018 www.amacad.org Bulletin vol. lxxi, no. 2 Induction Ceremony 2017 Class Speakers: Jane Mayer, Ursula Burns, James P. Allison, Heather K. Gerken, and Gerald Chan Annual David M. Rubenstein Lecture Looking at Earth: An Astronaut’s Journey David M. Rubenstein and Kathryn D. Sullivan ALSO: How Are Humans Different from Other Great Apes?–Ajit Varki, Pascal Gagneux, and Fred H. Gage Advancing Higher Education in America–Monica Lozano, Robert J. Birgeneau, Bob Jacobsen, and Michael S. McPherson Redistricting and Representation–Patti B. Saris, Gary King, Jamal Greene, and Moon Duchin noteworthy Select Prizes and Andrea Bertozzi (University of James R. Downing (St. Jude Chil- Barbara Grosz (Harvard Univer- California, Los Angeles) was se- dren’s Research Hospital) was sity) is the recipient of the Life- Awards to Members lected as a 2017 Simons Investi- awarded the 2017 E. Donnall time Achievement Award of the gator by the Simons Foundation. Thomas Lecture and Prize by the Association for Computational American Society of Hematology. Linguistics. Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Clara D. Bloomfield (Ohio State 2017 University) is the recipient of the Carol Dweck (Stanford Univer- Christopher Hacon (University 2017 Robert A. Kyle Award for sity) was awarded the inaugural of Utah) was awarded the Break- Joachim Frank (Columbia Univer- Outstanding Clinician-Scientist, Yidan Prize. through Prize in Mathematics. sity) presented by the Mayo Clinic Di- vision of Hematology. Felton Earls (Harvard Univer- Naomi Halas (Rice University) sity) is the recipient of the 2018 was awarded the 2018 Julius Ed- Nobel Prize in Economic Emmanuel J.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Report
    Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 2011 Annual Report 10 steps closer 10 steps closer Letter from the Chairman and the President 1 1 | First effective treatments for advanced melanoma 5 2 Genomic analysis offers clues to most common | type of ovarian cancer 7 3 Breast cancer surgery: practice-changing | findings for some patients 9 4 New drugs offer survival benefit for men | with metastatic prostate cancer 11 5 | Insights into DNA damage and repair 13 6 Novel stem cell technique shows promise | in treating disease 15 7 Combination therapy may prevent spread | of nasopharyngeal tumors 17 8 Algorithm can predict shape of proteins, | speeding basic cancer research 19 9 Two of 2011’s top five advances in cancer | research led by MSKCC physician-scientists 21 10 | The Josie Robertson Surgery Center 23 The Campaign for Memorial Sloan-Kettering 25 Statistical Profile 27 Financial Summary 29 Boards of Overseers and Managers 31 www.mskcc.org/annualreport Letter from the Chairman and the President The year 2011 was a strong one at Memorial Sloan-Kettering. We continued to lead across “Our success as an institution is due in the spectrum of patient care, research, and training, and laid the groundwork for important progress in the years ahead. great measure to our remarkable staff… We want to begin by saying that our success as an institution is due in great measure to our remarkable staff. On a daily basis, we are inspired by their dedication and compassion, and We are inspired by their dedication Douglas A. Warner III are grateful for the work they do in the service of our patients and our mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Resubmission JBC Frescas and De Lange
    Cell Biology: Binding of TPP1 Protein to TIN2 Protein Is Required for POT1a,b Protein-mediated Telomere Protection David Frescas and Titia de Lange J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289:24180-24187. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.592592 originally published online July 23, 2014 Downloaded from Access the most updated version of this article at doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.592592 http://www.jbc.org/ Find articles, minireviews, Reflections and Classics on similar topics on the JBC Affinity Sites. Alerts: • When this article is cited • When a correction for this article is posted at Rockefeller University Library on August 31, 2014 Click here to choose from all of JBC's e-mail alerts This article cites 29 references, 13 of which can be accessed free at http://www.jbc.org/content/289/35/24180.full.html#ref-list-1 THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 289, NO. 35, pp. 24180–24187, August 29, 2014 © 2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Published in the U.S.A. Binding of TPP1 Protein to TIN2 Protein Is Required for POT1a,b Protein-mediated Telomere Protection* Received for publication, June 30, 2014, and in revised form, July 22, 2014 Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 23, 2014, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M114.592592 David Frescas and Titia de Lange1 From the Laboratory for Cell Biology and Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065 Background: Chromosome ends require the TPP1/POT1 heterodimers for protection. Results: A TIN2 mutant that fails to bind TPP1 resulted in phenotypes associated with TPP1/POT1 deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • TELOMERE EXTENSION USING MODIFIED TERT Mrna TO
    TELOMERE EXTENSION USING MODIFIED TERT mRNA TO LENGTHEN HEALTHSPAN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE NEUROSCIENCES PROGRAM AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY John Ramunas May 2014 © 2014 by John Ramunas. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/vb798wq6556 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Helen Blau, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Michael Longaker I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Juan Santiago I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Robert Sapolsky Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost for Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Published Version
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2018 Biochemical and regulatory aspects of DNA double-strand break repair Godau, Julia Eileen Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-170542 Dissertation Published Version Originally published at: Godau, Julia Eileen. Biochemical and regulatory aspects of DNA double-strand break repair. 2018, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. Biochemical and Regulatory Aspects of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Julia Eileen Godau aus Deutschland Promotionskommission Prof. Dr. Alessandro A. Sartori (Vorsitz und Leitung der Dissertation) Prof. Dr. Joao Matos PD. Dr. Pavel Janscak Prof. Dr. Matthias Altmeyer Zürich, 2018 Contents Abbreviations v Summary vii Zusammenfassung ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Genome instability - A hallmark of cancer . 1 1.2 DNA damage response . 2 1.3 DNA repair . 3 1.3.1 DSB repair . 4 1.3.2 Meiotic recombination . 6 1.3.3 Fanconi anemia pathway of ICL repair . 7 1.4 Post-translational modifications . 10 1.5 CtIP . 11 1.5.1 Sae2/Ctp1/CtIP protein family . 11 1.5.2 CtIP promotes DNA-end resection . 13 1.5.3 Regulation of CtIP by PTMs . 15 1.5.4 CtIP and its connection to cancer development and therapy . 18 1.6 SLX4 - A nuclease scaffold . 19 1.7 PIN1 . 22 1.7.1 PIN1 - A molecular switch regulating diverse pathways .
    [Show full text]
  • GEOFFREY BEENE CANCER RESEARCH CENTER 10 Year Report, 2007–2017
    GEOFFREY BEENE CANCER RESEARCH CENTER 10 Year Report, 2007–2017 10 YEAR REPORT | 2007–2017 2 COVER IMAGES, CLOCKWISE FROM TOP LEFT: Tumor- and stromal cell-derived cathepsin S expression in primary breast cancer. Shown here is an immunofluorescence image of a human breast cancer specimen stained for the cysteine protease cathepsin S in red, and tumor cells in green. Cathepsin S expression, which is typically associated with immune cells such as macrophages, is expressed in a subset of breast carcinoma cells, and may endow them with the ability to metastasize to the brain The Iacobuzio lab and Kellan Lutz, an ambassador for the Geoffrey Beene Foundation Epifluorescent imaging of transparent casper zebrafish transplanted with the human-derived PC3 prostate cancer cell line exhibits dissemination solely to the spinal column Epifluorescent imaging of transparent casper zebrafish transplanted with the zebrafish- derived ZMEL1 melanoma cell line exhibits widely disseminated tumors to the skin, eyes, muscles, and brain. Image by Isabella Kim of the White lab Ping Chi and lab members Confocal microscopy shows that the nucleolar structure of hematopoietic stem cells is altered with Stag2 loss of function. Image by Aaron Viny of the Levine lab Scott Lowe and lab member 3 GEOFFREY BEENE CANCER RESEARCH CENTER CONTENTS Welcome . .2 Supporting Innovation through the Years . 5. Milestones . 6 Highlights of Breakthrough Projects . 8 Retreats and Special Conferences . 14. Supporting Novel Research . .16 Faculty . 18. Graduate Students . .19 Q&A with Barry Taylor . .19 Financial Statistics . 20 Research Grants . 21 Publications . 38 Shown are intestinal organoids derived from transgenic shRen mice in which renilla luciferase is suppressed by doxycycline .
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 40 Years of Rita Allen Foundation Scholars 1 PEOPLE Rita Allen Foundation Scholars: 1976–2016
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ORIGINS From the President . 4 Exploration and Discovery: 40 Years of the Rita Allen Foundation Scholars Program . .5 Unexpected Connections: A Conversation with Arnold Levine . .6 SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE Pioneering Pain Researcher Invests in Next Generation of Scholars: A Conversation with Kathleen Foley (1978) . .10 Douglas Fearon: Attacking Disease with Insights . .12 Jeffrey Macklis (1991): Making and Mending the Brain’s Machinery . .15 Gregory Hannon (2000): Tools for Tough Questions . .18 Joan Steitz, Carl Nathan (1984) and Charles Gilbert (1986) . 21 KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Robert Weinberg (1976): The Genesis of Cancer Genetics . .26 Thomas Jessell (1984): Linking Molecules to Perception and Motion . 29 Titia de Lange (1995): The Complex Puzzle of Chromosome Ends . .32 Andrew Fire (1989): The Resonance of Gene Silencing . 35 Yigong Shi (1999): Illuminating the Cell’s Critical Systems . .37 SCHOLAR PROFILES Tom Maniatis (1978): Mastering Methods and Exploring Molecular Mechanisms . 40 Bruce Stillman (1983): The Foundations of DNA Replication . .43 Luis Villarreal (1983): A Life in Viruses . .46 Gilbert Chu (1988): DNA Dreamer . .49 Jon Levine (1988): A Passion for Deciphering Pain . 52 Susan Dymecki (1999): Serotonin Circuit Master . 55 Hao Wu (2002): The Cellular Dimensions of Immunity . .58 Ajay Chawla (2003): Beyond Immunity . 61 Christopher Lima (2003): Structure Meets Function . 64 Laura Johnston (2004): How Life Shapes Up . .67 Senthil Muthuswamy (2004): Tackling Cancer in Three Dimensions . .70 David Sabatini (2004): Fueling Cell Growth . .73 David Tuveson (2004): Decoding a Cryptic Cancer . 76 Hilary Coller (2005): When Cells Sleep . .79 Diana Bautista (2010): An Itch for Knowledge . .82 David Prober (2010): Sleeping Like the Fishes .
    [Show full text]
  • The David Rockefeller Graduate Program 2011-2012 the David Rockefeller Graduate Program 2011-2012
    THE DAVID ROCKEFELLER GR ADUATE PROGR AM 2011-2012 Published by The Rockefeller University Office of Communications and Public Affairs The david rockefeller graduate program 2011-2012 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE 2 DEAN’S MESSAGE 5 ACADEMIC PROgrams 6 RESEARCH Areas 12 FACILITIES 17 STUdent LIFE 20 AdmissiONS AND SCHEDULE OF COUrses 25 LIFE AFTER ROCKEFELLER 30 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE “For MORE THAN A CENTURY, THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY HAS FUL- FILLED THE MISSION MY GRANDFATHER HAD ENVISIONED, TO PRODUCE DISCOVERIES THAT WOULD BENEFIT HUMANKIND. IT HAS BECOME ONE OF THE world’s GREAT MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTions.” DAVID ROCKEFELLER, LIFE TRUSTEE For me, neuroscience was love at first sight. Understanding the brain and wanting to know how to deconstruct and resolve its complexity fueled my career initially and still motivates me in my lab today. People fall in love with science at differ- ent times in their lives and bring their own perspective to learning and doing science, but the common denominator is an excitement and curiosity to understand the world around them — that’s what The Rockefeller University’s graduate pro- gram is designed to nurture. It is also what fuels Rockefeller’s world-class faculty, who push the boundaries of knowledge with their innovative approaches to scientific discovery. In an environment without departments that supports freedom to explore different areas of science, both students and faculty chart their own paths. For faculty, it enables research that has led to pioneering discoveries with the potential to erad- icate disease and reduce suffering for millions. For students, it provides flexibility to work with more than one professor on their chosen thesis topic.
    [Show full text]
  • 47Th Annual Presentation Ceremony Lewis S. Rosenstiel Award For
    47TH ANNUAL PRESENTATION CEREMONY LEWIS S. ROSENSTIEL AWARD FOR DISTINGUISHED WORK IN BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCE THURSDAY APRIL 12, 2018 In 1971, the Lewis S. Rosenstiel Award for Distinguished Work in Basic Medical Science was established as an expression of the belief that educational institutions have an important role to play in the encouragement and development of basic science as it applies to medicine. Since its inception, Brandeis University has placed great emphasis on basic science and its relationship to medicine. With the establishment of the Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, made possible by the generosity of Lewis S. Rosenstiel in 1968, research in basic medical science at Brandeis has been expanded significantly. The Rosenstiel award provides a way to extend the center’s support beyond the campus community. The award is presented annually at Brandeis based on recommendations from a panel of outstanding scientists selected by the Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center. Medals are given to scientists for recent discoveries of particular originality and importance to basic medical science research. A $25,000 prize (to be shared in the event of multiple winners) accompanies the award. The winner of the 2017 Lewis S. Rosenstiel Award for Distinguished Work in Basic Medical Science is Titia de Lange of the Anderson Center for Cancer Research at The Rockefeller University. De Lange was chosen for her seminal studies that solved the end- protection problem of linear chromosomes. PRESENTATION CEREMONY WELCOME RON LIEBOWITZ President Brandeis University REMARKS JAMES E. HABER Abraham and Etta Goodman Professor of Biology Director, Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center Brandeis University ADDRESS HAROLD VARMUS Lewis Thomas University Professor of Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine at Cornell University 1989 NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSIOLOGY OR MEDICINE PRESENTATION OF MEDALLIONS AND AWARDS JAMES E.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009-Annual-Report.Pdf
    THEN Whitehead Institute 2009 ANNUAL REPORT “ I’m constantly amazed now at how much of development seems to be about nuance…We have made enormous progress in describing many of the genes required, but the magnitude of the challenge to get the real picture of what’s actually occurring, and the subtleties involved, is something I didn’t NOWappreciate 20 years ago. ” CONTENTS 1 OUR FUTURE IS NOW 2 SCIENTIFIC ACHIEVEMENT 11 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS 40 WHITEHEAD FELLOWS 42 COMMUNITY EVOLUTION 44 HONOR ROLL OF DONORS 48 FINANCIAL SUMMARY 49 LEADERSHIP cover quote Commentary from Whitehead Institute Member Hazel Sive contemplating the 2009 Annual Report theme, “What I thought then…What I know now.” Her colleagues’ perspectives on the same subject may be found beginning on page 11 of this report. background image During endocytosis, clathrin-lined pockets of a cell’s membrane engulf exterior molecules, creating membrane-bound bubbles that shuttle the molecules into the cell’s interior. Whitehead Special Fellow Defne Yarar is studying the activity of a clathrin protein shown here (stained green in this monkey kidney cell) and other molecules that associate with it, including one known as SH3D19 (stained blue). credits director and editor MATT FEARER associate editor NICOLE GIESE editorial assistant CEAL CAPISTRANO design HECHT DESIGN photography CHRIS SANCHEZ IMAGES: page 3 Reproduced with permission. From Dickinson AJ, Sive HL, Development, 2009, 136(7):1071-81. page 4 Reprinted from Cell,136(5), Soldner F, Hockemeyer D, Beard C, Gao Q, Bell GW, Cook EG, Hargus G, Blak A, Cooper O, Mitalipova M, Isacson O, Jaenisch R, “Parkinson’s disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors,” 964-77, 2009, with permission from Elsevier.
    [Show full text]
  • APOBEC3B-Dependent Kataegis and TREX1-Driven Chromothripsis In
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/725366; this version posted August 5, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. APOBEC3B-dependent kataegis and TREX1-driven chromothripsis in telomere crisis John Maciejowski1,2,*, **, Aikaterini Chatzipli3,*, Alexandra Dananberg1, Titia de Lange2,**, Peter J. Campbell3,** 1Molecular Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; 2Laboratory for Cell Biology and Genetics, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; 3Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK Keywords: telomere crisis, chromothripsis, kataegis, TREX1, APOBEC3B, dicentric chromosome *Equal contribution **Co-corresponding authors: John Maciejowski: [email protected] Titia de Lange: [email protected] Peter J. Campbell: [email protected] !1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/725366; this version posted August 5, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Chromothripsis and kataegis are frequently observed in cancer and can arise from telomere crisis, a period of genome instability during tumorigenesis when depletion of the telomere reserve generates unstable dicentric chromosomes1–5. Here we report on the mechanism underlying chromothripsis and kataegis using an in vitro telomere crisis model.
    [Show full text]
  • The Telomeric DNA Damage Response Occurs in the Absence of Chromatin Decompaction
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 7, 2017 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The telomeric DNA damage response occurs in the absence of chromatin decompaction Aleksandra Vancevska,1,4 Kyle M. Douglass,2,4 Verena Pfeiffer,1,3 Suliana Manley,2 and Joachim Lingner1 1Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; 2Institute of Physics, Laboratory of Experimental Biophysics, EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Telomeres are specialized nucleoprotein structures that protect chromosome ends from DNA damage response (DDR) and DNA rearrangements. The telomeric shelterin protein TRF2 suppresses the DDR, and this function has been attributed to its abilities to trigger t-loop formation or prevent massive decompaction and loss of density of telomeric chromatin. Here, we applied stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) to measure the sizes and shapes of functional human telomeres of different lengths and dysfunctional telomeres that elicit a DDR. Telomeres have an ovoid appearance with considerable plasticity in shape. Examination of many telomeres dem- onstrated that depletion of TRF2, TRF1, or both affected the sizes of only a small subset of telomeres. Costaining of telomeres with DDR markers further revealed that the majority of DDR signaling telomeres retained a normal size. Thus, DDR signaling at telomeres does not require decompaction. We propose that telomeres are monitored by the DDR machinery in the absence of telomere expansion and that the DDR is triggered by changes at the molecular level in structure and protein composition. [Keywords: telomeres; DNA damage response; chromatin compaction; STORM] Supplemental material is available for this article.
    [Show full text]