NIH) Director's Pioneer Award (NDPA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NIH) Director's Pioneer Award (NDPA Outcome Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director’s Pioneer Award (NDPA), FY 2004–2005 Case Studies July 22, 2011 Prepared for the NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH G. Stephane Philogene, Ph.D. Project Officer Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives Office of the Director, NIH Prepared by Bhavya Lal—Task Leader Elizabeth C. Lee, Amy Marshall Richards, Adrienne Zhu, Mary Elizabeth Hughes, Stephanie Shipp IDA Science and Technology Policy Institute 1899 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 520 Washington DC 20006 Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................1 2. Aggregate Analyses .................................................................................................................7 3. Case Studies ...........................................................................................................................15 A. Larry Abbott (2004) ......................................................................................................15 1. Research Summary ..................................................................................................15 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ............................................................................16 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ....................................................................16 4. Value of the NDPA Program ...................................................................................19 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ........................................................................................20 B. Vicki Chandler (2005) ...................................................................................................29 1. Research Summary ..................................................................................................29 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ............................................................................30 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ....................................................................30 4. Value of the NDPA Program ...................................................................................32 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ........................................................................................34 C. Hollis Cline (2005) ........................................................................................................43 1. Research Summary ..................................................................................................43 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ............................................................................44 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ....................................................................44 4. Value of the NDPA Program ...................................................................................47 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ........................................................................................49 D. Leda Cosmides (2005) ...................................................................................................57 1. Research Summary ..................................................................................................57 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ............................................................................58 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ....................................................................58 4. Value of the NDPA Program ...................................................................................61 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ........................................................................................63 E. George Daley (2004) .....................................................................................................71 1. Research Summary ..................................................................................................71 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ............................................................................72 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ....................................................................72 4. Value of the NDPA Program ...................................................................................75 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ........................................................................................76 F. Titia de Lange (2005) ....................................................................................................85 1. Research Summary ..................................................................................................85 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ............................................................................86 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ....................................................................86 4. Value of the NDPA Program ...................................................................................89 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ........................................................................................90 i G. Karl Deisseroth (2005) ..................................................................................................97 1. Research Summary ..................................................................................................97 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ............................................................................98 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ....................................................................98 4. Value of the NDPA Program .................................................................................101 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ......................................................................................103 H. Pehr Harbury (2005) ....................................................................................................111 1. Research Summary ................................................................................................111 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ..........................................................................112 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ..................................................................112 4. Value of the NDPA Program .................................................................................114 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ......................................................................................116 I. Homme Hellinga (2004) ..............................................................................................123 1. Research Summary ................................................................................................123 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ..........................................................................124 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ..................................................................124 4. Value of the NDPA Program .................................................................................126 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ......................................................................................128 J. Erich Jarvis (2005) ......................................................................................................135 1. Research Summary ................................................................................................135 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ..........................................................................136 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ..................................................................136 4. Value of the NDPA Program .................................................................................139 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ......................................................................................141 K. Joseph (Mike) McCune (2004) ....................................................................................149 1. Research Summary ................................................................................................149 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ..........................................................................150 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ..................................................................150 4. Value of the NDPA Program .................................................................................153 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ......................................................................................155 L. Steven McKnight (2004) .............................................................................................162 1. Research Summary ................................................................................................162 2. NDPA Reviewer Panel Opinions ..........................................................................163 3. Nature of Project Risks and Outcomes ..................................................................163 4. Value of the NDPA Program .................................................................................165 5. Descriptive Bibliometrics ......................................................................................167 M. Chad Mirkin (2004) .....................................................................................................173 1. Research
Recommended publications
  • Looking at Earth: an Astronaut's Journey Induction Ceremony 2017
    american academy of arts & sciences winter 2018 www.amacad.org Bulletin vol. lxxi, no. 2 Induction Ceremony 2017 Class Speakers: Jane Mayer, Ursula Burns, James P. Allison, Heather K. Gerken, and Gerald Chan Annual David M. Rubenstein Lecture Looking at Earth: An Astronaut’s Journey David M. Rubenstein and Kathryn D. Sullivan ALSO: How Are Humans Different from Other Great Apes?–Ajit Varki, Pascal Gagneux, and Fred H. Gage Advancing Higher Education in America–Monica Lozano, Robert J. Birgeneau, Bob Jacobsen, and Michael S. McPherson Redistricting and Representation–Patti B. Saris, Gary King, Jamal Greene, and Moon Duchin noteworthy Select Prizes and Andrea Bertozzi (University of James R. Downing (St. Jude Chil- Barbara Grosz (Harvard Univer- California, Los Angeles) was se- dren’s Research Hospital) was sity) is the recipient of the Life- Awards to Members lected as a 2017 Simons Investi- awarded the 2017 E. Donnall time Achievement Award of the gator by the Simons Foundation. Thomas Lecture and Prize by the Association for Computational American Society of Hematology. Linguistics. Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Clara D. Bloomfield (Ohio State 2017 University) is the recipient of the Carol Dweck (Stanford Univer- Christopher Hacon (University 2017 Robert A. Kyle Award for sity) was awarded the inaugural of Utah) was awarded the Break- Joachim Frank (Columbia Univer- Outstanding Clinician-Scientist, Yidan Prize. through Prize in Mathematics. sity) presented by the Mayo Clinic Di- vision of Hematology. Felton Earls (Harvard Univer- Naomi Halas (Rice University) sity) is the recipient of the 2018 was awarded the 2018 Julius Ed- Nobel Prize in Economic Emmanuel J.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Report
    Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 2011 Annual Report 10 steps closer 10 steps closer Letter from the Chairman and the President 1 1 | First effective treatments for advanced melanoma 5 2 Genomic analysis offers clues to most common | type of ovarian cancer 7 3 Breast cancer surgery: practice-changing | findings for some patients 9 4 New drugs offer survival benefit for men | with metastatic prostate cancer 11 5 | Insights into DNA damage and repair 13 6 Novel stem cell technique shows promise | in treating disease 15 7 Combination therapy may prevent spread | of nasopharyngeal tumors 17 8 Algorithm can predict shape of proteins, | speeding basic cancer research 19 9 Two of 2011’s top five advances in cancer | research led by MSKCC physician-scientists 21 10 | The Josie Robertson Surgery Center 23 The Campaign for Memorial Sloan-Kettering 25 Statistical Profile 27 Financial Summary 29 Boards of Overseers and Managers 31 www.mskcc.org/annualreport Letter from the Chairman and the President The year 2011 was a strong one at Memorial Sloan-Kettering. We continued to lead across “Our success as an institution is due in the spectrum of patient care, research, and training, and laid the groundwork for important progress in the years ahead. great measure to our remarkable staff… We want to begin by saying that our success as an institution is due in great measure to our remarkable staff. On a daily basis, we are inspired by their dedication and compassion, and We are inspired by their dedication Douglas A. Warner III are grateful for the work they do in the service of our patients and our mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Resubmission JBC Frescas and De Lange
    Cell Biology: Binding of TPP1 Protein to TIN2 Protein Is Required for POT1a,b Protein-mediated Telomere Protection David Frescas and Titia de Lange J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289:24180-24187. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.592592 originally published online July 23, 2014 Downloaded from Access the most updated version of this article at doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.592592 http://www.jbc.org/ Find articles, minireviews, Reflections and Classics on similar topics on the JBC Affinity Sites. Alerts: • When this article is cited • When a correction for this article is posted at Rockefeller University Library on August 31, 2014 Click here to choose from all of JBC's e-mail alerts This article cites 29 references, 13 of which can be accessed free at http://www.jbc.org/content/289/35/24180.full.html#ref-list-1 THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 289, NO. 35, pp. 24180–24187, August 29, 2014 © 2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Published in the U.S.A. Binding of TPP1 Protein to TIN2 Protein Is Required for POT1a,b Protein-mediated Telomere Protection* Received for publication, June 30, 2014, and in revised form, July 22, 2014 Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 23, 2014, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M114.592592 David Frescas and Titia de Lange1 From the Laboratory for Cell Biology and Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065 Background: Chromosome ends require the TPP1/POT1 heterodimers for protection. Results: A TIN2 mutant that fails to bind TPP1 resulted in phenotypes associated with TPP1/POT1 deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Directed Searches for Continuous Gravitational Waves from Spinning Neutron Stars in Binary Systems
    Directed searches for continuous gravitational waves from spinning neutron stars in binary systems by Grant David Meadors Adissertationsubmittedinpartialfulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Physics) in The University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Professor John Keith Riles, Chair Professor Fred C. Adams Professor Nuria Pilar Calvet Research Scientist Herold Richard Gustafson Professor Timothy A. McKay Professor Stephen C. Rand c Grant David Meadors 2014 ⃝ All Rights Reserved To the tree of Life, which took stardust and evolved into us. Pro arbore Vitae, ex nube stellarum ad nos evolvit. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks should go beyond a simple page. Lest I forget, let me reflect on all the people without whom I would not have made it here. To my parents, Erin O’Rourke- Meadors and Gregory David Meadors, and my brother, Patrick Thomas Meadors. Home’s name follows you; three decades have we explored – beyond seas, roots grow. My dear grandmother, Florenceann O’Rourke (n´ee Williams), supported my undergraduate studies at Reed College. Aunt Nan & Uncle Bud Williams made book- reading & museum-going fond memories. Hanford gave time to learn my family’s wonderful stories. If only my paternal grandparents, ShulerandJeanne(Brown) Meadors, could be here too. Ethan Obie Romero-Severson is ever a devoted friend in adventures & colleague in mathematics: Team Science for fouryearsandcounting! Keith Riles is a dedicated and conscientious adviser: steadyprogressishownew science is born – detecting gravitational waves is a tricky task, and his thoughtful attention to details will be part of what makes it possible. Dick Gustafson introduced me to the field in 2005 and has helped ever since; my only regret working with him is that we never flew the glider, although we nearly won a sailboat regatta.
    [Show full text]
  • TELOMERE EXTENSION USING MODIFIED TERT Mrna TO
    TELOMERE EXTENSION USING MODIFIED TERT mRNA TO LENGTHEN HEALTHSPAN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE NEUROSCIENCES PROGRAM AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY John Ramunas May 2014 © 2014 by John Ramunas. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/vb798wq6556 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Helen Blau, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Michael Longaker I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Juan Santiago I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Robert Sapolsky Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost for Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 World Science Festival to Comprise More Than 50 Events Over Five Days in Indoor and Outdoor Locations Across New York City, May 27–31
    For Immediate Release, May 4, 2015 2015 WORLD SCIENCE FESTIVAL TO COMPRISE MORE THAN 50 EVENTS OVER FIVE DAYS IN INDOOR AND OUTDOOR LOCATIONS ACROSS NEW YORK CITY, MAY 27–31 Nation’s Foremost Science Festival Will Bring the Drama of Scientific Discovery to Everyone, with a Wide Range of Original Programs Including: • Celebrations of the 100th Anniversary of Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, Including a New Original Work, Light Falls, Featuring Festival Co-Founder Brian Greene, and Created with Composer Jeff Beal (“House of Cards”) and the 2015 Tony-Nominated Team from 59 Productions (An American in Paris); and a Discussion of Relativity Since Einstein, Moderated by Greene and Featuring an All-Star Lineup of Panelists • Opportunities to Hear and Engage with Numerous World-Renowned Scientists, Including NASA Chief Scientist Ellen Stofan, Paleoanthropologist Lee Berger, Nobel-Winning Theoretical Physicist Steven Weinberg, and Physicist and String Theorist Edward Witten, Who Will Deliver the Festival’s Signature “On the Shoulders of Giants” Lecture • Immersive Activities Such as Stargazing (with Music) in Brooklyn Bridge Park, a Catch-and- Release Fish Count in the Waters Surrounding NYC, a Massive Sculptural Installation from NASA Exploring Satellites, Scientific Sails Through New York Harbor, and a Science Street Fair in Washington Square Park • Science and Story: Nature’s Dramas, Featuring Award-Winning Authors Diane Ackerman (The Human Age), Dan Fagin (Toms River), David Quammen (The Chimp and the River), Rebecca Skloot (The Immortal
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Published Version
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2018 Biochemical and regulatory aspects of DNA double-strand break repair Godau, Julia Eileen Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-170542 Dissertation Published Version Originally published at: Godau, Julia Eileen. Biochemical and regulatory aspects of DNA double-strand break repair. 2018, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. Biochemical and Regulatory Aspects of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Julia Eileen Godau aus Deutschland Promotionskommission Prof. Dr. Alessandro A. Sartori (Vorsitz und Leitung der Dissertation) Prof. Dr. Joao Matos PD. Dr. Pavel Janscak Prof. Dr. Matthias Altmeyer Zürich, 2018 Contents Abbreviations v Summary vii Zusammenfassung ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Genome instability - A hallmark of cancer . 1 1.2 DNA damage response . 2 1.3 DNA repair . 3 1.3.1 DSB repair . 4 1.3.2 Meiotic recombination . 6 1.3.3 Fanconi anemia pathway of ICL repair . 7 1.4 Post-translational modifications . 10 1.5 CtIP . 11 1.5.1 Sae2/Ctp1/CtIP protein family . 11 1.5.2 CtIP promotes DNA-end resection . 13 1.5.3 Regulation of CtIP by PTMs . 15 1.5.4 CtIP and its connection to cancer development and therapy . 18 1.6 SLX4 - A nuclease scaffold . 19 1.7 PIN1 . 22 1.7.1 PIN1 - A molecular switch regulating diverse pathways .
    [Show full text]
  • GEOFFREY BEENE CANCER RESEARCH CENTER 10 Year Report, 2007–2017
    GEOFFREY BEENE CANCER RESEARCH CENTER 10 Year Report, 2007–2017 10 YEAR REPORT | 2007–2017 2 COVER IMAGES, CLOCKWISE FROM TOP LEFT: Tumor- and stromal cell-derived cathepsin S expression in primary breast cancer. Shown here is an immunofluorescence image of a human breast cancer specimen stained for the cysteine protease cathepsin S in red, and tumor cells in green. Cathepsin S expression, which is typically associated with immune cells such as macrophages, is expressed in a subset of breast carcinoma cells, and may endow them with the ability to metastasize to the brain The Iacobuzio lab and Kellan Lutz, an ambassador for the Geoffrey Beene Foundation Epifluorescent imaging of transparent casper zebrafish transplanted with the human-derived PC3 prostate cancer cell line exhibits dissemination solely to the spinal column Epifluorescent imaging of transparent casper zebrafish transplanted with the zebrafish- derived ZMEL1 melanoma cell line exhibits widely disseminated tumors to the skin, eyes, muscles, and brain. Image by Isabella Kim of the White lab Ping Chi and lab members Confocal microscopy shows that the nucleolar structure of hematopoietic stem cells is altered with Stag2 loss of function. Image by Aaron Viny of the Levine lab Scott Lowe and lab member 3 GEOFFREY BEENE CANCER RESEARCH CENTER CONTENTS Welcome . .2 Supporting Innovation through the Years . 5. Milestones . 6 Highlights of Breakthrough Projects . 8 Retreats and Special Conferences . 14. Supporting Novel Research . .16 Faculty . 18. Graduate Students . .19 Q&A with Barry Taylor . .19 Financial Statistics . 20 Research Grants . 21 Publications . 38 Shown are intestinal organoids derived from transgenic shRen mice in which renilla luciferase is suppressed by doxycycline .
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2009 Issue (Pdf)
    The Supernetwork Sentinel The Newsletter of the Virtual Center for Supernetworks Summer 2009 Welcome to the Summer 2009 edition of The Supernetwork Sentinel, the newsletter of the Virtual Center for Supernetworks at the Isenberg School of Management, UMass Amherst. The Supernetwork Sentinel is published in Fall, Winter, and Summer editions. Its purpose is to keep you informed of events, activities, and successes of the Virtual Center for Supernetworks, the Center Associates, and the Supernetworks Laboratory for Computation and Visualization. In this newsletter, we include an essay on highlights of recent presentations from Vienna to Rome by the Director. We also give information on a new book, update you on the World Science Festival Traffic Panel – June World Science Festival in NYC, and mark notable 12, 2009 (l-r) Robert Krulwich (ABC and distinctions and awards received by Center NPR), Professor Iain Couzin (Princeton), Associates. In addition, we share news about Professor Anna Nagurney, and Professor exciting upcoming events. As always, we include Mitchell Joachim (Columbia) a list of our recent publications. We wish everyone a wonderful summer! Inside Anna Nagurney Highlights of Recent Presentations John F. Smith Memorial Professor from Vienna to Rome Director – Virtual Center for Supernetworks http://supernet.som.umass.edu New Book – Fragile Networks: Identifying Vulnerabilities and Synergies in an Uncertain World The World Science Festival Reflections on the 2009 Spring UMass Amherst INFORMS Speaker Series Kudos and News Recent Center Publications Professor Anna Nagurney with some of the Participants in the NET2009 Conference in Rome, Italy Contents Copyright © 2009 University of Massachusetts Amherst Hosting of Professor Pentland of MIT 1 Professor Nagurney at Vienna University Professor Nagurney at St.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 40 Years of Rita Allen Foundation Scholars 1 PEOPLE Rita Allen Foundation Scholars: 1976–2016
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ORIGINS From the President . 4 Exploration and Discovery: 40 Years of the Rita Allen Foundation Scholars Program . .5 Unexpected Connections: A Conversation with Arnold Levine . .6 SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE Pioneering Pain Researcher Invests in Next Generation of Scholars: A Conversation with Kathleen Foley (1978) . .10 Douglas Fearon: Attacking Disease with Insights . .12 Jeffrey Macklis (1991): Making and Mending the Brain’s Machinery . .15 Gregory Hannon (2000): Tools for Tough Questions . .18 Joan Steitz, Carl Nathan (1984) and Charles Gilbert (1986) . 21 KEYNOTE SPEAKERS Robert Weinberg (1976): The Genesis of Cancer Genetics . .26 Thomas Jessell (1984): Linking Molecules to Perception and Motion . 29 Titia de Lange (1995): The Complex Puzzle of Chromosome Ends . .32 Andrew Fire (1989): The Resonance of Gene Silencing . 35 Yigong Shi (1999): Illuminating the Cell’s Critical Systems . .37 SCHOLAR PROFILES Tom Maniatis (1978): Mastering Methods and Exploring Molecular Mechanisms . 40 Bruce Stillman (1983): The Foundations of DNA Replication . .43 Luis Villarreal (1983): A Life in Viruses . .46 Gilbert Chu (1988): DNA Dreamer . .49 Jon Levine (1988): A Passion for Deciphering Pain . 52 Susan Dymecki (1999): Serotonin Circuit Master . 55 Hao Wu (2002): The Cellular Dimensions of Immunity . .58 Ajay Chawla (2003): Beyond Immunity . 61 Christopher Lima (2003): Structure Meets Function . 64 Laura Johnston (2004): How Life Shapes Up . .67 Senthil Muthuswamy (2004): Tackling Cancer in Three Dimensions . .70 David Sabatini (2004): Fueling Cell Growth . .73 David Tuveson (2004): Decoding a Cryptic Cancer . 76 Hilary Coller (2005): When Cells Sleep . .79 Diana Bautista (2010): An Itch for Knowledge . .82 David Prober (2010): Sleeping Like the Fishes .
    [Show full text]
  • Directed Searches for Continuous Gravitational Waves from Spinning Neutron Stars in Binary Systems
    Directed searches for continuous gravitational waves from spinning neutron stars in binary systems by Grant David Meadors Adissertationsubmittedinpartialfulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Physics) in The University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Professor John Keith Riles, Chair Professor Fred C. Adams Professor Nuria Pilar Calvet Research Scientist Herold Richard Gustafson Professor Timothy A. McKay Professor Stephen C. Rand c Grant David Meadors 2014 ! All Rights Reserved To the tree of Life, which took stardust and evolved into us. Pro arbore Vitae, ex nube stellarum ad nos evolvit. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks should go beyond a simple page. Lest I forget, let me reflect on all the people without whom I would not have made it here. To my parents, Erin O’Rourke- Meadors and Gregory David Meadors, and my brother, Patrick Thomas Meadors. Home’s name follows you; three decades have we explored – beyond seas, roots grow. My dear grandmother, Florenceann O’Rourke (n´ee Williams), supported my undergraduate studies at Reed College. Aunt Nan & Uncle Bud Williams made book- reading & museum-going fond memories. Hanford gave time to learn my family’s wonderful stories. If only my paternal grandparents, ShulerandJeanne(Brown) Meadors, could be here too. Ethan Obie Romero-Severson is ever a devoted friend in adventures & colleague in mathematics: Team Science for fouryearsandcounting! Keith Riles is a dedicated and conscientious adviser: steadyprogressishownew science is born – detecting gravitational waves is a tricky task, and his thoughtful attention to details will be part of what makes it possible. Dick Gustafson introduced me to the field in 2005 and has helped ever since; my only regret working with him is that we never flew the glider, although we nearly won a sailboat regatta.
    [Show full text]
  • The David Rockefeller Graduate Program 2011-2012 the David Rockefeller Graduate Program 2011-2012
    THE DAVID ROCKEFELLER GR ADUATE PROGR AM 2011-2012 Published by The Rockefeller University Office of Communications and Public Affairs The david rockefeller graduate program 2011-2012 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE 2 DEAN’S MESSAGE 5 ACADEMIC PROgrams 6 RESEARCH Areas 12 FACILITIES 17 STUdent LIFE 20 AdmissiONS AND SCHEDULE OF COUrses 25 LIFE AFTER ROCKEFELLER 30 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE “For MORE THAN A CENTURY, THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY HAS FUL- FILLED THE MISSION MY GRANDFATHER HAD ENVISIONED, TO PRODUCE DISCOVERIES THAT WOULD BENEFIT HUMANKIND. IT HAS BECOME ONE OF THE world’s GREAT MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTions.” DAVID ROCKEFELLER, LIFE TRUSTEE For me, neuroscience was love at first sight. Understanding the brain and wanting to know how to deconstruct and resolve its complexity fueled my career initially and still motivates me in my lab today. People fall in love with science at differ- ent times in their lives and bring their own perspective to learning and doing science, but the common denominator is an excitement and curiosity to understand the world around them — that’s what The Rockefeller University’s graduate pro- gram is designed to nurture. It is also what fuels Rockefeller’s world-class faculty, who push the boundaries of knowledge with their innovative approaches to scientific discovery. In an environment without departments that supports freedom to explore different areas of science, both students and faculty chart their own paths. For faculty, it enables research that has led to pioneering discoveries with the potential to erad- icate disease and reduce suffering for millions. For students, it provides flexibility to work with more than one professor on their chosen thesis topic.
    [Show full text]