DOCSLIB.ORG

REFERENCE SCENARIO (RS) Current Situation and Projections with Policies and Measures Existing As at the End of 2017 (Without Implementing The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REFERENCE SCENARIO (RS) Current Situation and Projections with Policies and Measures Existing As at the End of 2017 (Without Implementing The REFERENCE SCENARIO (RS) Current situation and projections with policies and measures existing as at the end of 2017 (without implementing the NECP) Annex 1 to the 2021-2030 National Energy and Climate Plan Rev. 5.2 of 18/12/2019 Current situation and projections with policies and measures existing as at the end of 2017 (reference scenario – without implementing the NECP) Table of contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 3 4. CURRENT SITUATION AND PROJECTIONS WITH EXISTING POLICIES AND MEASURES (AS AT THE END OF 2017) .............................................................................................................................................. 3 4.1 Projected evolution of main exogenous factors influencing energy system and greenhouse gas emission developments – general parameters and variables ....................................................................... 3 4.1.1. Population ................................................................................................................................... 3 4.1.2. GDP ............................................................................................................................................ 4 4.1.3. Sectoral gross value added ........................................................................................................ 4 4.1.4. Number and size of households ................................................................................................. 5 4.1.5. Disposable household income .................................................................................................... 6 4.1.6. Passenger transport performance .............................................................................................. 6 4.1.7. Freight transport performance .................................................................................................... 7 4.1.8. International fuel import prices .................................................................................................... 8 4.1.9. Prices of EU ETS CO2 emission allowances .............................................................................. 8 4.1.10. Exchange rates ........................................................................................................................... 9 4.1.11. Number of heating and cooling degree days .............................................................................. 9 4.1.12. Technology cost assumptions used in the modelling of key technologies ................................. 9 4.2. Dimension decarbonisation.................................................................................................................14 4.2.1. Greenhouse gas emissions and removals ................................................................................14 4.2.2. Renewable energy ....................................................................................................................31 4.3. Dimension energy efficiency ...............................................................................................................39 4.3.1. Primary and final energy consumption .....................................................................................39 4.3.2. Final energy consumption by sector .........................................................................................40 4.3.3. Final energy consumption by fuel .............................................................................................41 4.3.4. Non-energy use.........................................................................................................................42 4.3.5. Primary energy intensity ...........................................................................................................43 4.3.6. Final energy intensity by sector ................................................................................................43 4.3.7. Fuel input in electricity and heat generation .............................................................................43 4.3.8. Fuel input in other conversion processes .................................................................................44 4.3.9. Share of cogeneration in electricity and heat production ..........................................................44 4.3.10. Production of heat in power plants, combined heat and power plants and heating plants ......45 4.3.11. Potential for high-efficiency cogeneration and efficient district heating and cooling ................45 4.3.12. Cost-optimal minimum requirements for energy performance .................................................48 4.4. Dimension energy security ..................................................................................................................50 4.4.1. National energy resources ........................................................................................................50 4.4.2. Inland production by fuel type ...................................................................................................57 4.4.3. Net imports by fuel type ............................................................................................................58 4.4.4. Main sources of imports (countries) ..........................................................................................59 4.4.5. Gross inland fuel and energy consumption ..............................................................................60 4.4.6. Electricity and heat production ..................................................................................................61 4.4.7. Gross electricity generation by fuel ...........................................................................................62 2 Current situation and projections with policies and measures existing as at the end of 2017 (reference scenario – without implementing the NECP) 4.4.8. Electricity generation capacity by source ..................................................................................64 4.5 Dimension internal energy market ......................................................................................................65 4.5.1. Interconnections ........................................................................................................................65 4.5.2. Energy transmission infrastructure ...........................................................................................65 4.5.3. Electricity and gas markets, energy prices ...............................................................................74 4.6. Dimension Research, innovation and competitiveness ...................................................................84 4.6.1. Current situation of the low-carbon-technologies sector and its position on the global market84 4.6.2. Current level of public and private investment in research and innovation in low-carbon technologies, current number of patents and current number of researchers ...............................................91 4.6.3. Current level of energy costs taking into account the international context .............................94 4.6.4. Current research and innovation policies and measures. ......................................................109 4.6.5. Projection of outlays on emission reduction research ............................................................119 Introduction This document is an analytical contribution to the preparation of the 2021-2030 National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP), being the first of two analytical annexes to the NECP. The study explores the impact of policies and measures that existed until the end of 2017, representing a business-as-usual scenario that does not take into account the implementation of policies and actions determined after 31 December 2017. This is the reference scenario (RS) for the Energy and Climate Policy (ECP) scenario, which is presented in Annex 2 of the NECP – Impact Assessment of planned policies and measures. The ECP scenario is an analysis of the impact of policies and measures that set out how and with what results the climate and energy targets and targets implementing the Energy Union will be achieved. Both documents present a multi-faceted impact analysis of the effects of implementation until 2030, with an outlook to the year 2040. This part of the report and the information it contains are consistent with guidelines stemming from Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. 4. CURRENT SITUATION AND PROJECTIONS WITH EXISTING POLICIES AND MEASURES (as at the end of 2017) 4.1 Projected evolution of main exogenous factors influencing energy system and greenhouse gas emission developments – general parameters and variables 4.1.1. Population The size of the population residing in Poland was estimated on the basis of the census conducted in 2011, with calculations for the consecutive years being based on data from administrative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dimensional Analysis and the Theory of Natural Units
    LIBRARY TECHNICAL REPORT SECTION SCHOOL NAVAL POSTGRADUATE MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA 93940 NPS-57Gn71101A NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS AND THE THEORY OF NATURAL UNITS "by T. H. Gawain, D.Sc. October 1971 lllp FEDDOCS public This document has been approved for D 208.14/2:NPS-57GN71101A unlimited release and sale; i^ distribution is NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California Rear Admiral A. S. Goodfellow, Jr., USN M. U. Clauser Superintendent Provost ABSTRACT: This monograph has been prepared as a text on dimensional analysis for students of Aeronautics at this School. It develops the subject from a viewpoint which is inadequately treated in most standard texts hut which the author's experience has shown to be valuable to students and professionals alike. The analysis treats two types of consistent units, namely, fixed units and natural units. Fixed units include those encountered in the various familiar English and metric systems. Natural units are not fixed in magnitude once and for all but depend on certain physical reference parameters which change with the problem under consideration. Detailed rules are given for the orderly choice of such dimensional reference parameters and for their use in various applications. It is shown that when transformed into natural units, all physical quantities are reduced to dimensionless form. The dimension- less parameters of the well known Pi Theorem are shown to be in this category. An important corollary is proved, namely that any valid physical equation remains valid if all dimensional quantities in the equation be replaced by their dimensionless counterparts in any consistent system of natural units.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Changes for Bidder Reference. It Does Not Go Into the Project Manual. It Is Simply a Reference of the Changes Made in the Frontal Documents
    Community Colleges of Spokane ALSC Architects, P.S. SCC Lair Remodel 203 North Washington, Suite 400 2019-167 G(2-1) Spokane, WA 99201 ALSC Job No. 2019-010 January 10, 2020 Page 1 ADDENDUM NO. 1 The additions, omissions, clarifications and corrections contained herein shall be made to drawings and specifications for the project and shall be included in scope of work and proposals to be submitted. References made below to specifications and drawings shall be used as a general guide only. Bidder shall determine the work affected by Addendum items. General and Bidding Requirements: 1. Pre-Bid Meeting Pre-Bid Meeting notes and sign in sheet attached 2. Summary of Changes Summary of Changes for bidder reference. It does not go into the Project Manual. It is simply a reference of the changes made in the frontal documents. It is not a part of the construction documents. In the Specifications: 1. Section 00 30 00 REPLACED section in its entirety. See Summary of Instruction to Bidders Changes for description of changes 2. Section 00 60 00 REPLACED section in its entirety. See Summary of General and Supplementary Conditions Changes for description of changes 3. Section 00 73 10 DELETE section in its entirety. Liquidated Damages Checklist Mead School District ALSC Architects, P.S. New Elementary School 203 North Washington, Suite 400 ALSC Job No. 2018-022 Spokane, WA 99201 March 26, 2019 Page 2 ADDENDUM NO. 1 4. Section 23 09 00 Section 2.3.F CHANGED paragraph to read “All Instrumentation and Control Systems controllers shall have a communication port for connections with the operator interfaces using the LonWorks Data Link/Physical layer protocol.” A.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Units Conversions and Fundamental Constants James D
    February 2, 2016 Natural Units Conversions and Fundamental Constants James D. Wells Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics (MCTP) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Abstract: Conversions are listed between basis units of natural units system where ~ = c = 1. Important fundamental constants are given in various equivalent natural units based on GeV, seconds, and meters. Natural units basic conversions Natural units are defined to give ~ = c = 1. All quantities with units then can be written in terms of a single base unit. It is customary in high-energy physics to use the base unit GeV. But it can be helpful to think about the equivalences in terms of other base units, such as seconds, meters and even femtobarns. The conversion factors are based on various combinations of ~ and c (Olive 2014). For example −25 1 = ~ = 6:58211928(15) × 10 GeV s; and (1) 1 = c = 2:99792458 × 108 m s−1: (2) From this we can derive several useful basic conversion factors and 1 = ~c = 0:197327 GeV fm; and (3) 2 11 2 1 = (~c) = 3:89379 × 10 GeV fb (4) where I have not included the error in ~c conversion but if needed can be obtained by consulting the error in ~. Note, the value of c has no error since it serves to define the meter, which is the distance light travels in vacuum in 1=299792458 of a second (Olive 2014). The unit fb is a femtobarn, which is 10−15 barns. A barn is defined to be 1 barn = 10−24 cm2. The prefexes letters, such as p on pb, etc., mean to multiply the unit after it by the appropropriate power: femto (f) 10−15, pico (p) 10−12, nano (n) 10−9, micro (µ) 10−6, milli (m) 10−3, kilo (k) 103, mega (M) 106, giga (G) 109, terra (T) 1012, and peta (P) 1015.
    [Show full text]
  • English Customary Weights and Measures
    English Customary Weights and Measures Distance In all traditional measuring systems, short distance units are based on the dimensions of the human body. The inch represents the width of a thumb; in fact, in many languages, the word for "inch" is also the word for "thumb." The foot (12 inches) was originally the length of a human foot, although it has evolved to be longer than most people's feet. The yard (3 feet) seems to have gotten its start in England as the name of a 3-foot measuring stick, but it is also understood to be the distance from the tip of the nose to the end of the middle finger of the outstretched hand. Finally, if you stretch your arms out to the sides as far as possible, your total "arm span," from one fingertip to the other, is a fathom (6 feet). Historically, there are many other "natural units" of the same kind, including the digit (the width of a finger, 0.75 inch), the nail (length of the last two joints of the middle finger, 3 digits or 2.25 inches), the palm (width of the palm, 3 inches), the hand (4 inches), the shaftment (width of the hand and outstretched thumb, 2 palms or 6 inches), the span (width of the outstretched hand, from the tip of the thumb to the tip of the little finger, 3 palms or 9 inches), and the cubit (length of the forearm, 18 inches). In Anglo-Saxon England (before the Norman conquest of 1066), short distances seem to have been measured in several ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Effective Teaching of Units and Measurements in Nigerian Secondary Schools: Guidelines for Physics Teachers
    TOWARDS EFFECTIVE TEACHING OF UNITS AND MEASUREMENTS IN NIGERIAN SECONDARY SCHOOLS: GUIDELINES FOR PHYSICS TEACHERS Isa Shehu Usman Department of Science and Technology Education, University of Jos and Meshack Audu Lauco Department of Science Laboratory Technology Federal Polytechnic Kaura Namoda Abstract The concern of Physics educators in today's modem world is that teaching of physics should shift from teacher-dominated approach to student-centered approach of hands-on and minds-on activities. The relevance of units and measurements particularly in sciences and commerce in today's world cannot be over-emphasised. Through units and measurements, one can determine the magnitude of certain physical quantities. It is good to realise that when measurements are carried out, it must be followed by their units otherwise the values obtained become meaningless. Based on these assertions, this paper examined the brief h/story of units and measurements, concepts of units and measurements, the international Standard Units (SI) units and the traditional systems of units and measurements. The paper as well provided some guidelines for physics teachers on units and measurements and ended up with student's activities and recommendations. Physics is a practical and experimental science. Its relevance to scientific and technological development of any nation cannot be overemphasized. As such, its effective teaching and learning must be encouraged by all nations of the world. During practical and experiments, teachers usually ask students to measure length, mass, temperature, time and so on of different objects using some measuring instruments. Students carry out these activities in the laboratory during practical and experiments. They do these activities using knowledge and skills imparted to them by their teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • English Version
    UNESCO World Heritage Convention World Heritage Committee 2011 Addendum Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties ICOMOS report for the World Heritage Committee, 35th ordinary session UNESCO, June 2011 Secrétariat ICOMOS International 49-51 rue de la Fédération 75015 Paris France Tel : 33 (0)1 45 67 67 70 Fax : 33 (0)1 45 66 06 22 World Heritage List Nominations received by 1st February 2011 V Mixed properties A Asia - Pacific Minor modifications to the boundaries Australia [N/C 147ter] Kakadu National Park 1 VI Cultural properties A Africa Properties referred back by previous sessions of the World Heritage Committee Ethiopia [C 1333rev] The Konso Cultural Landscape 2 Kenya [C 1295rev] Fort Jesus, Mombasa 16 Minor modifications to the boundaries Mauritius [C 1259] Le Morne Cultural Landscape 29 B Arab States Creation of buffer zone Syrian Arab Republic [C 20] Ancient City of Damascus 30 C Asia - Pacific Minor modifications to the boundaries Malaysia [C 1223] Melaka and George Town, Historic Cities of the Straits of Malacca 32 D Europe Properties referred back by previous sessions of the World Heritage Committee France [C 1153rev] The Causses and the Cévennes, Mediterranean agro-pastoral Cultural Landscape 34 France, Argentina, Belgium, Germany, Japan, Switzerland [C 1321rev] The architectural work of Le Corbusier, an outstanding contribution to the Modern Movement 47 Israel [C 1105rev] The Triple-arch Gate at Dan 72 Minor modifications to the boundaries Cyprus [C 848] Choirokoitia 83 Italy [C 726] Historic Centre of Naples 85 Spain [C 522rev] Renaissance Monumental Ensembles of Úbeda and Baeza 87 Creation of buffer zone Germany [C 271] Pilgrimage Church of Wies 89 Germany [C 515rev] Abbey and Altenmünster of Lorsch 90 E Latin America and the Caribbean Minor modifications to the boundaries Chile [C 1178] Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works 92 Creation of buffer zone Honduras [C 129] Maya Site of Copan 94 surrounded by the property, which currently extends to 1.98 million hectares.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 the Psychological Reality of Grammar: a Student's-Eye View of Cognitive Science
    9 The psychological reality of grammar: a student's-eye view of cognitive science Thomas G. Bever Never mind about the why: figure out the how, and the why will take care of itself. Lord Peter Wimsey Introduction This is a cautionary historical tale about the scientific study of what we know, what we do, and how we acquire what we know and do. There are two opposed paradigms in psychological science that deal with these interrelated topics: The behaviorist prescribes possible adult structures in terms of a theory of what can be learned; the rationalist explores adult structures in order to find out what a developmental theory must explain. The essential moral of the recent history of cognitive science is that it is more productive to explore mental life than pre­ scribe it. The classical period Experimental cognitive psychology was born the first time at the end of the nineteenth century. The pervasive bureaucratic work in psychology by Wundt (1874) and the thoughtful organization by James (1890) demonstrated that ex­ periments on mental life both can be done and are interesting. Language was an obviously appropriate object of this kind of psychological study. Wundt (1911), in particular, gave great attention to summarizing a century of research on the natural units and structure oflanguage; (see especially, Humboldt, 1835; Chom­ sky, 1966). He reported a striking conclusion: The natural unit of linguistic knowledge is the intuition that a sequence is a sentence. He reasoned as follows: All of the cited articles coauthored by me were substantially written when I was an asso­ ciate in George A.
    [Show full text]
  • The International System of Units (SI)
    The International System of Units (SI) m kg s cd SI mol K A NIST Special Publication 330 2008 Edition Barry N. Taylor and Ambler Thompson, Editors NIST SPECIAL PUBLICATION 330 2008 EDITION THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM OF UNITS (SI) Editors: Barry N. Taylor Physics Laboratory Ambler Thompson Technology Services National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 United States version of the English text of the eighth edition (2006) of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures publication Le Système International d’ Unités (SI) (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 330, 2001 Edition) Issued March 2008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, James Turner, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 330, 2008 Edition Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Pub. 330, 2008 Ed., 96 pages (March 2008) CODEN: NSPUE2 WASHINGTON 2008 Foreword The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI (from the French Le Système International d’Unités), is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant system used in science, the SI is rapidly becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce. In recognition of this fact and the increasing global nature of the marketplace, the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, which changed the name of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and gave to NIST the added task of helping U.S. industry increase its competitiveness, designates “the metric system of measurement as the preferred system of weights and measures for United States trade and commerce.” The definitive international reference on the SI is a booklet published by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) and often referred to as the BIPM SI Brochure.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITS in PARTICLE PHYSICS SI System of Units the Base Quantities
    PARTICLE PHYSICS 2003 PART 2 (Lectures 2-4) KINEMATICS K. VARVELL UNITS IN PARTICLE PHYSICS SI System of units The base quantities are mass, length and time. Units for these are chosen to be on a \human" scale. Quantity Dimensions Units Mass [ M ] 1 kg Length [ L ] 1 m Time [ T ] 1 s Other quantities are derived, e.g. Quantity Dimensions Units Velocity [ LT−1 ] 1 m s−1 Ang. Mom. [ ML2T−1 ] 1 kg m2 s−1 Energy [ ML2T−2 ] 1 J 2 SI units are not really convenient for particle physics! e.g. −27 Mass of proton mp = 1:67 × 10 kg −15 \Radius" of proton rp ≈ 0:8 × 10 m Natural Units Particle physics relies heavily on Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Formulae in Special Relativity are littered with the quantity \speed of light in vacuum" c = 3:0 × 108ms−1 and those in Quantum Mechanics with Planck's Constant h, or − ~ = h=2π = 1:055 × 10 34Js 3 In natural units we set ~ ≡ c ≡ 1 in all equations, e.g. E2 = p2c2 + m2c4 becomes E2 = p2 + m2 What does this really mean? One way to view it is to regard energy, velocity and angular momentum as base quantities rather than mass, length and time. 4 Quantity Dimensions Units Energy [ E ] 1 GeV= 1:602 × 10−10J Velocity [ V ] 1 \natural velocity unit c" Ang. Mom. [ W ] 1 \natural ang. mom. unit ~" Now mass, length, time etc. are derived quantities Quantity Dimensions Units Mass [ E V−2 ] 1 GeV (unit of c)−2 − Length [ V W E−1 ] 1 (unit of c) (unit of ~) GeV 1 − Time [ W E−1 ] 1 (unit of ~) GeV 1 We don't bother to write \(unit of c)" or \(unit of ~)", and when we substitute for c or ~ in formulae using these units we just write \1" since e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Natural Units and Plane Waves
    QUANTUM MECHANICS II A Second Course in Quantum Theory RUBIN H. LANDAU 0 2004 WTLEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. APPENDIX A NATURAL UNITS AND PLANE WAVES A.1 Natural Units It is common and useful to use natural units in derivations and problem solving. This serves to save time and make the equations more transparent by eliminating the physical constants which tend to clutter the equations. In contrast to the popular belief, once you have developed the knack of placing the constants back into the final answers, dimensional analysis is still possible. The basis of our natural units has Planck’s constant h = 1 and the speed of light c = 1. To convert to natural units just take your formulas in conventional units and set h = 1 and c = 1. The fine structure constant a = e2/hc 2 1/137.04 becomes a = e2 2: 1/137.04. With these units, angular momenta are measured inh’s, velocities in c’s, and masses as rest energies m2= m (for example the electron has m2= m = 0.5 11 MeV). Thus the Compton wavelength h/m= l/m is in inverse mass (energy) units. In summary: e2 e2 1 a= - -e 2 2:- hc 44ic 137.04’ -_h - -1 - 1 mc m 0.511MeV’ To convert from natural to conventional units, just insert the h’s and c’s. In practice, the author finds it simplest to: 0 Change mass m to mc’ so it has energy units. 0 Change e2 to a = e2/hc so it is dimensionless. 0 Insert hc, which has the dimensions of energy x length, in either numerator or denominator to get the dimensions in the desired form (or close to it as described next).
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Constants and Natural Systems of Units in a Spacetime of Arbitrary Dimension
    universe Communication Universal Constants and Natural Systems of Units in a Spacetime of Arbitrary Dimension Anton Sheykin * and Sergey Manida HEP&EP Department, Saint Petersburg State University. Ul’yanovskaya, 1, 198504 St.-Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 September 2020; Accepted: 29 September 2020; Published: 1 October 2020 Abstract: We study the properties of fundamental physical constants using the threefold classification of dimensional constants proposed by J.-M. Lévy-Leblond: constants of objects (masses, etc.), constants of phenomena (coupling constants), and “universal constants” (such as c and h¯ ). We show that all of the known “natural” systems of units contain at least one non-universal constant. We discuss the possible consequences of such non-universality, e.g., the dependence of some of these systems on the number of spatial dimensions. In the search for a “fully universal” system of units, we propose a set of constants that consists of c, h¯ , and a length parameter and discuss its origins and the connection to the possible kinematic groups discovered by Lévy-Leblond and Bacry. Finally, we give some comments about the interpretation of these constants. Keywords: natural units; universal constants; Planck units; dimensional analysis; kinematic groups 1. Introduction The recent reform of the SI system made the definitions of its primary units (except the second) dependent on world constants, such as c, h¯ , and kB. This thus sharpens the question about the conceptual nature of physical constants in theoretical physics (see, e.g., the recent review [1]). This question can be traced back to Maxwell and Gauss, and many prominent scientists made their contribution to the discussion of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Harmonic Power Laws Relating the Frequency Equivalents of the Electron, Bohr Radius, Rydberg Constant with the Fine Structure, Planck’S Constant, 2 and Π
    Journal of Modern Physics, 2016, 7, 1801-1810 http://www.scirp.org/journal/jmp ISSN Online: 2153-120X ISSN Print: 2153-1196 Fundamental Harmonic Power Laws Relating the Frequency Equivalents of the Electron, Bohr Radius, Rydberg Constant with the Fine Structure, Planck’s Constant, 2 and π Donald William Chakeres Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA How to cite this paper: Chakeres, D.W. Abstract (2016) Fundamental Harmonic Power Laws − Relating the Frequency Equivalents of the We evaluate three of the quantum constants of hydrogen, the electron, e , the Bohr Electron, Bohr Radius, Rydberg Constant radius, a0, and the Rydberg constants, R∞, as natural unit frequency equivalents, v. with the Fine Structure, Planck’s Constant, This is equivalent to Planck’s constant, h, the speed of light, c, and the electron 2 and π. Journal of Modern Physics, 7, charge, e, all scaled to 1 similar in concept to the Hartree atomic, and Planck units. 1801-1810. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2016.713160 These frequency ratios are analyzed as fundamental coupling constants. We recog- 2 nize that the ratio of the product of 8π , the ve− times the vR divided by va0 squared Received: August 3, 2016 equals 1. This is a power law defining Planck’s constant in a dimensionless domain as Accepted: September 27, 2016 1. We also find that all of the possible dimensionless and dimensioned ratios corres- Published: September 30, 2016 pond to other constants or classic relationships, and are systematically inter-related Copyright © 2016 by author and by multiple power laws to the fine structure constant, α; and the geometric factors 2, Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
    [Show full text]