Iconography of Deities and Demons: Electronic Pre–Publication 1/5 Last Revision: 14 May 2012
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Iconography of Deities and Demons: Electronic Pre–Publication 1/5 Last Revision: 14 May 2012 Milkom vantine deities (DAVIAU/DION 1994; DA- VIAU 2002: 66; DABROVSKI 1995; UEHLIN- I. Introduction. Levantine god, GER 1997: 104, 112f, 117f, 121; MEZA →DDD. According to the biblical authors 2000: 205–207), have been unearthed in M. was the chief deity of the Ammonites Jordan. They belong to a larger group of (e.g., 1 Kgs 11:5, 33; 2 Kgs 23:13). His con- Ammonite statues and statuettes in the fusion with Moloch as well as misreadings round dating to the 8th–6th cent., and have of M. in biblical manuscripts have been been subdivided into four or five groups discussed elsewhere (e.g., PUECH 1999). according to Egyptian, Transjordanian, Despite the predominance of El–names in Syro–Phoenician, and Assyrian features the Ammonite onomasticon (roughly 90 (DORNEMANN 1983: 153–163; ABOU ASSAF percent are constituted with the theophoric 1980: 48–85; ZAYADINE 1991: 31–61). element “El” [HÜBNER 1992], but only Granite and limestone statues (e.g., J 1657: about 7 percent contain references to M., for ABOU ASSAF 1980: pl. 3; BARNETT 1951: example, Milkom˒ur, Milkom–gad, Bod/ pl. 10) were discovered in Amman on the Bar–Milkom [AVIGAD/SASS 1997: nos. 860, citadel mount of Jebel al–Qal˓ah and else- 940, 853]; for an ostracon from Tall Mazar where in (J 4767: ABOU ASSAF 1980: pl. with the personal name Milkomyat see 11:19) and near Amman (J 16739: ABOU YASSINE/TEIXIDOR 1986: 48f, no. 7), evi- ASSAF 1980: pl. 5:7). Another specimen was dence does exist that M. could well have found at Khirbet al–Hajjar (J 12953: ABOU been the chief deity of the Ammonite kings. ASSAF 1980: pl. 1; IBRAHIM 1971: pl. 2). It is generally believed that the divine name Fragments of more statuettes were found at [M]lkm can be reconstructed in the 8th cent. Abu ˓Alanda (J 12465: ABOU ASSAF 1980: Amman citadel inscription, in which M. is pl. 11:18), while others (e.g., J 8882: ABOU referred to as the divine client or patron of ASSAF 1980: pl. 4:4; J 6806: ABOU ASSAF the palatial and/or temple structures on the 1980: pl. 4:5; J 2801: ABOU ASSAF 1980: pl. citadel mount of Jebel al–Qal˓ah (HÜBNER 4:6; Beirut No. 60.30: ABOU ASSAF 1980: 1992: 254). On the other hand, it is striking pl. 11:20) are unprovenanced. The statuettes that none of the royal Ammonite names and statues vary in size between 30–85 cm. attested contain the theophoric name M., The same figure is also represented on a neither in the Hebrew Bible nor in Ammon- limestone relief (HUMBERT/ZAYADINE ite inscriptions (for a recent list of kings see: 1992: pl. 9:a) and by small clay figurines, REINHOLD 2003; VAN DER VEEN 2005:137– also dating to the 8th–6th cent., which were 184; 2007). This, however, is not necessar- found at Tall Jawa (DAVIAU/DION 1994: pl. ily a contradiction. It has been suggested 10; DAVIAU 2002: fig. 2.33:1) and on the that either M. (literally “king’s [deity]” or citadel mount of Amman (ZAYADINE 1989: “divine king”: HÜBNER 1992: 254) was a 362). Two specimens and a torso from Tall royal epithet for El (DAVIAU/DION 1994; al–˓Umayri may also be related (DAB- AUFRECHT 1999) or →Baal (HÜBNER 1992: ROWSKI 1995: figs. 5–7). A deity with what 256; 1993: 137), or that El was a deus otio- may be an Atef crown and a two–winged sus referring to M. (ISRAEL 1991: 333f; LE- uraeus can be seen on an Ammonite jar MAIRE 1994: 143). At any rate, M. and El handle impression from Tall al–˓Umayri may well have been worshipped as essen- (EGGLER/KEEL 2006: Tall al–˓Umeiri no. tially one deity (UEHLINGER 1997: 118). No 50). final answers can be reached at this point Although the represented figures share since the archaeological evidence is no some common grounds with the Egyptian doubt “ambiguous at best and meagre at god Osiris, several elements are of local most” (AUFRECHT 1999: 156). Several sug- Ammonite nature, such as the heal–long gestions have been made concerning M.’s gown, the scarf wrapped around the shoul- representation in Ammonite glyptic art, der, and in many cases a trimmed natural which need to be taken seriously, especially beard (with and without moustache). Even if certainty is precluded by lack of sufficient though the Atef crown is also worn by other evidence. Levantine deities (UEHLINGER 1997: figs. 3, II. Typology 19–20, 22) and though clay figurines nor- II.1. Phenotypes mally represent deities only (STERN 2001: A. ANTHROPOMORPHIC: POSSIBLE. 251), some evidence suggests that these A number of erect statues and figurines of figures could also be Ammonite monarchs bearded individuals wearing a plumed Atef (ZAYADINE 1991: 31–61; HÜBNER 1992: crown (→Crown [Egypt] § II.1.2.9), a 267; MEZA 2000: 205). One statue (J 1656: headdress worn by the Egyptian mummified ABOU ASSAF 1980: pl. 6; BARNETT 1951: god →Osiris as well as by female and pl. 11), albeit without Atef crown but with beardless male East Mediterranean and Le- the same clothes worn by most Atef crown IDD website: http://www.religionswissenschaft.unizh.ch/idd Iconography of Deities and Demons: Electronic Pre–Publication 2/5 Last Revision: 14 May 2012 figures, is identified in an inscription as proximity to the Ammonite royal cult. This “Yarh˓azar, son of Zakir, son of the cultic tradition would then recall that of d Shanipu/i” (BARNETT 1951; AUFRECHT Bronze Age Ugarit, where malikū deities 1989: no. 58; LIPIŃSKI 2006: 317). It is con- (“divine kings”) were also closely associ- firmed in the Assyrian annals of Tiglath– ated with the rp˒um spirits of the Ugaritic pileser III (744–727) that this individual is deceased kings (HEALEY 1978). Moreover, of royal descent by identifying his grand– the Mesopotamian kispum ritual (COHEN father Sanipu as king of the Ammonites 2005: 104–108) as well as the ancestral (PRITCHARD 1969: 282; HÜBNER 1992: 189; royal cult at Qatna come to mind (PFÄL- REINHOLD 2003: 106f; VAN DER VEEN ZNER 2009). However, more research will 2005: 159). The posture of these statues has be necessary to confirm this apparent con- been likened to that of the royal statuary of nection (VAN DER VEEN forthcoming). Egypt and Assyria (ABOU ASSAF 1980: 19– B. THERIOMORPHIC: POSSIBLE 76; IBRAHIM 1971: 92–97; 1989: 59–71). 1. Some scholars (HÜBNER 1992: 262; While most if not all Osirid statues have 1993: 137) consider M. as essentially the their left arms bent as if holding a scepter, a Ammonite form of the Canaanite weather lotus flower is held by Yarḥ˓azar as well as god →Baal. Indeed, Baal belongs to the by another headless statue from the citadel Ammonite pantheon and is especially at- mount in Amman (J 8124: ABOU ASSAF tested by inscriptions from the 6th–5th cent. 1980: pl. 7). The lotus flower is a common and most evidently by theophoric names Levantine symbol of regeneration and re- such as Ba˓alyasha˓ (VAN DER VEEN 2007: birth, frequently found in the hands of living 66–70; EGGLER/KEEL 2006: Tall al– and deceased monarchs as on the Byblite ˓Umaiyri no. 4), b˓l/y˓[.] (EGGLER/KEEL Ahiram sarcophagus (→King [Levant] 2006: Tall al–˓Umaiyri no. 30), and a frag- 22*) or the stelae of Kilamuwa and Barrak- mentary personal name (or separate divine kab of Sam˒al (→Rakib–El 1*–2). Bring- name) in the Amman theatre inscription c ing both aspects together, it has therefore -]b l (DAJANI 1967–1968: 65–67). Standing been surmised that the Atef-crowned statues and striding bulls, an animal often associ- may well represent deified deceased kings ated with the weather god, are depicted who were venerated at the citadel mount of partly in association with astral, solar, and Ammon–Rabbah (MEZA 2000: 205). Un- lunar elements that emphasize their heav- marked pupils on Atef crown statue J 1657 enly abode on several stamp seals from Jor- and an anthropoid sarcophagus from Sahab dan (EGGLER/KEEL 2006: ˓Amman nos. 9, may also portray the deified monarch during 51; Karak no. 4; Pella no. 74; Rudschm al– his “sleep of death” (ZAYADINE 1991: 37). Malfuf Süd no. 1; Tell al–Mazar no. 18; The cult of the deified kings of Ammon Tall al–˓Umayri nos. 3, 11; Tall as–Sa˓idiya would not be dissimilar to that of the Phar- no. 10), and unprovenanced name seals aohs, who were united with Osiris in the which are classified as Ammonite by their afterlife (VAN DER VEEN forthcoming; also inscription (EGGLER/KEEL 2006: as–Salt no. MEZA 2000: 205). The Osirid link may be 1; AVIGAD/SASS 1997: nos. 937, 971, 979, further supported by an 8th–7th cent. bronze 985). It can therefore be reasoned that they figurine from Assur (JAKOB–ROST 1990: could be representations of M. in his role as fig. 203). While this figurine wears the same weather god. Moreover, striding bulls are Atef crown and possesses the same facial depicted on two seals, which bear personal “Ammonite” features (big ears, almond- names with the M. theophoric element shaped eyes, and neatly trimmed Levantine (Milkom˓az; Bod/Bar–milkom: AVI- beard), it quite clearly holds the very insig- GAD/SASS 1997: nos. 792, 853). But since nia of the Egyptian deity Osiris, the crook bulls appear on a large variety of personal and the flail (pers.