DOCSLIB.ORG

Crossing the Line: Tel Aviv-Jerusalem Fast Train October 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crossing the Line: Tel Aviv-Jerusalem Fast Train October 2010 Crossing the Line: The Tel Aviv-Jerusalem Fast Train A new Israeli train line through occupied West Bank areas Who Profits from the Occupation October 2010 Crossing the Line: The Tel Aviv-Jerusalem Fast Train Who Profits from the Occupation 1 The Coalition of Women for Peace brings together ten feminist peace organizations and non-affiliated activist women in Israel. Founded soon after the outbreak of the Second Intifada in 2000, CWP today is a leading voice against the occupation, committed to feminist principles of organizing and Jewish-Palestinian partnership in a relentless struggle for a just peace. CWP continuously voices a critical position against militarism and advocates for radical social and political change. Its work includes direct action and public campaigning in Israel and internationally; a pioneering investigative project exposing the occupation industry; outreach to Israeli audiences and political empowerment of women across communities; and capacity-building and support for grassroots activists and initiatives for peace and justice. E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.coalitionofwomen.org Who Profits from the Occupation is a research project of the Coalition of Women for Peace. Initiated in response to the Palestinian call for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) on Israel, this research project is dedicated to exposing the commercial involvement of Israeli and international companies in the continuing Israeli control over Palestinian and Syrian land. The project publishes information about these companies on its website (www.whoprofits.org), produces in-depth reports and serves as an information center. 3 Yegia Kapayim St., Tel Aviv, Israel P.O.Box 29214, Tel Aviv 61292, Israel Tel: 972-3-5281005 E-mail: whoprofi[email protected] Crossing the Line: The Tel Aviv-Jerusalem Fast Train Who Profits from the Occupation 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 Introduction 5-6 Methodology 6 Part 1: The A1 train line and its implications 1.1 Is it legal? 8 1.2 Crossing the Green Line in the Latrun Enclave 9-10 1.3 Crossing the Green Line in Cedars Valley 11-12 1.3.1 Beit Surik: Israeli justice 13-15 1.3.2 Beit Iksa: a community under attack 16-19 1.4 Why go through the West Bank? 20 Part 2: Corporate involvement in the A1 train line 2.1 Foreign know-how and necessary expertise 22 2.2 Status of construction 23 2.3 Planners and Consultants 24 2.4 Section by section: what is being built and by whom 25-27 Executive Summary A new fast train line is planned to connect construction of the train line. Because Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, Israel’s two the project requires special expertise, main metropolitan centers, with two or several international corporations have three trains an hour, in a 28-minute route. been contracted to provide economic This new train line, sometimes referred and engineering consultancy, specialized to as the A1 train, is one of the biggest tunneling machinery and tunneling work. infrastructure projects that the Israeli government has undertaken in the last The report identifies a number of decade. The route crosses official state international corporations involved in borders into the occupied West Bank in the project and lists some of the main two areas, using occupied Palestinian planners, consultants and contractors land, some of it privately owned, for for each section of the train line. These an Israeli transportation project aimed contractors include two governmental exclusively for Israelis. companies: Deutsche Bahn (Germany) and Moscow Metrostroy (Russia), as Part 1 of the report follows the planned well as private European firms such as route of the railway and its implications. Pizzarotti (Italy). As of October 2010, the It discusses the planning process and construction in most of the route is well the legal considerations concerning underway, but the main tunneling has not the route, describes the situation of the yet begun and the deadline for completion Palestinian communities most affected by has been postponed to 2016-7. the route and provides firsthand accounts by the residents. By crossing the Green Line border into the West Bank, the A1 train line is unlawful and unethical. According to international law, an occupier may not use the occupied resources solely for the benefit of its own citizens. This line was planned for the exclusive use of Israeli citizens; it is imposed on the local Palestinian residents by the dictates of a military regime, in which they have no representation; and it would be completely inaccessible to the local residents. The 6 kilometers (3.75 miles) of the railway route which fall outside the official Israeli state borders are creating devastating effects on the three Palestinian communities in the area. Part 2 of the report focuses on the involvement of Israeli and international companies in the planning and Crossing the Line: The Tel Aviv-Jerusalem Fast Train Who Profits from the Occupation 4 Introduction A new train line is planned to connect Tel Palestinian residents by the dictates of Aviv and Jerusalem, Israel’s two main a military regime, in which they have no metropolitan centers, with two or three representation; and it would be completely trains an hour, in a 28-minute route. inaccessible to the local residents. This new train line, sometimes referred to as the A1 train, is one of the biggest The 6 kilometers (3.75 miles) of the infrastructure projects that the Israeli railway route which fall outside the official government has undertaken in the last Israeli state borders may seem like a decade. Surprisingly, this route crosses small infraction, but for three neighboring official state borders into the occupied Palestinian communities, already West Bank in two areas, using occupied shattered by a series of land confiscations Palestinian lands, some of it privately and draconian movement restrictions, this owned, for an Israeli transportation project railway line has devastating effects. aimed exclusively for Israelis. Building this train on occupied land is Once the planned train route crossed the totally unnecessary. The old train line Green Line border into the West Bank, it between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem does became unlawful and unethical. According not cross the international border. A to international law, an occupier may new and improved fast line could have not use the occupied resources solely stayed within state borders, and in fact for the benefit of its own citizens. This such alternative routes were proposed line was planned for the exclusive use of in the planning process. The choice to Israeli citizens; it is imposed on the local cross the Green Line, and to cross it ‘Deep soil for keeping’: Piles of extracted soil from the preliminary digging work, kept for later use. The commercial use of any extracted soil from the occupied territory is illegal by international law. Picture taken in the main logistics base for Section C of the A1 railway, near Sha’ar Hagay, October 2010. Crossing the Line: The Tel Aviv-Jerusalem Fast Train Who Profits from the Occupation 5 twice, was a deliberate choice, and a special expertise, several international careful look at it exposes some of the corporations have been contracted workings of a distorted social, legal to provide economic and engineering and economic environment based in a consultancy, specialized tunneling military occupation. machinery and tunneling work. Part 2 includes a description of the status of Part 1 of the report follows the planned construction as of October 2010, and lists route of the railway and its implications. some of the main planners, consultants The first chapter describes the planning and contractors for each section of the process, the legal considerations train line. concerning the route, and the ways in which the planners dismissed them. The Beit Surik Village Council has The next two chapters describe the two explicitly called for international areas where the route crosses the Green intervention and support: “We, the people Line border into the occupied area: of Beit Surik, do not want the train The Latrun Enclave and Cedars Valley. line to be built on our land. We see as The chapter on Cedars Valley includes fundamentally important that the people firsthand accounts by residents of the two of the world support our right to decide communities most affected by the route: on the use of our own land and help us Beit Surik and Beit Iksa. Part 1 concludes change the route of this train line”. (See with the chapter “Why go through the the complete letter in section 1.3.1 of West Bank”, which discusses the choice of the report). As an Israeli organization the controversial route for the train. committed to ending the occupation, we support the call of the Beit Surik Village Part 2 focuses on the involvement of Council. We have created this report so Israeli and international companies in that others can become aware of, and the planning and construction of the respond effectively to the destructive train line. Because the project requires effects of the A1 train route. Methodology Research for this report was conducted using both desk studies and field research. The desk studies included the collection and analysis of information from various public sources, including: land confiscation orders, records of public hearings of the various planning boards, court proceedings, different publications of the companies involved, of Israel Railways and the Israeli Ministry of Transportation and two appeals for information based on the freedom of information act. The field research included visits to two of the communities most affected by the route of the new railway, Beit Surik and Beit Iksa, interviews with officials from the local councils, local farmers and land owners, visits to the railway’s construction sites and conversations with the workers on site.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Access to Jerusalem – New Military Order Limits West Bank Palestinian Access
    February 2006 Special Focus Humanitarian Reports Humanitarian Assistance in the oPt Humanitarian Events Monitoring Issues Special Focus: Access to Jerusalem – New Military Order Limits West Bank Palestinian Access As the Barrier nears completion around Jerusalem, recent Israeli The eight other crossings are less time-consuming - drivers and their military orders further restrict West Bank Palestinian pedestrian and passengers generally drive through a checkpoint encountering only vehicle access into Jerusalem.1 These orders integrate the Barrier random ID checks. crossing regime into the closure system and limit West Bank Palestinian traffic into Jerusalem to four Barrier crossings (see map Reduced access to religious sites: below): Qalandiya from the north, Gilo from the south2, Shu’fat camp The ability of the Muslim and Christian communities in the West from the east and Ras Abu Sbeitan (Olive) for pedestrian residents Bank to freely access holy sites in Jerusalem is an additional of Abu Dis, and Al ‘Eizariya.3 concern. With these orders, for example, all three major routes between Jerusalem and Bethlehem (Tunnel road, original Road 60 Currently, there are 12 routes and crossings to enter Jerusalem from (Gilo) and Ein Yalow) will be blocked for Palestinian use. the West Bank including the four in the Barrier (see detailed map Christian and Muslim residents of Bethlehem and the surrounding attached). The eight other routes and crossing points into Jerusalem, villages will in the future access Jerusalem through one barrier now closed to West Bank Palestinians, will remain open to residents crossing and only if a permit has been obtained from the Israeli Civil of Israel including those living in settlements, persons of Jewish Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2014 Al-Malih Shaqed Kh
    Salem Zabubah Ram-Onn Rummanah The West Bank Ta'nak Ga-Taybah Um al-Fahm Jalameh / Mqeibleh G Silat 'Arabunah Settlements and the Separation Barrier al-Harithiya al-Jalameh 'Anin a-Sa'aidah Bet She'an 'Arrana G 66 Deir Ghazala Faqqu'a Kh. Suruj 6 kh. Abu 'Anqar G Um a-Rihan al-Yamun ! Dahiyat Sabah Hinnanit al-Kheir Kh. 'Abdallah Dhaher Shahak I.Z Kfar Dan Mashru' Beit Qad Barghasha al-Yunis G November 2014 al-Malih Shaqed Kh. a-Sheikh al-'Araqah Barta'ah Sa'eed Tura / Dhaher al-Jamilat Um Qabub Turah al-Malih Beit Qad a-Sharqiyah Rehan al-Gharbiyah al-Hashimiyah Turah Arab al-Hamdun Kh. al-Muntar a-Sharqiyah Jenin a-Sharqiyah Nazlat a-Tarem Jalbun Kh. al-Muntar Kh. Mas'ud a-Sheikh Jenin R.C. A'ba al-Gharbiyah Um Dar Zeid Kafr Qud 'Wadi a-Dabi Deir Abu Da'if al-Khuljan Birqin Lebanon Dhaher G G Zabdah לבנון al-'Abed Zabdah/ QeiqisU Ya'bad G Akkabah Barta'ah/ Arab a-Suweitat The Rihan Kufeirit רמת Golan n 60 הגולן Heights Hadera Qaffin Kh. Sab'ein Um a-Tut n Imreihah Ya'bad/ a-Shuhada a a G e Mevo Dotan (Ganzour) n Maoz Zvi ! Jalqamus a Baka al-Gharbiyah r Hermesh Bir al-Basha al-Mutilla r e Mevo Dotan al-Mughayir e t GNazlat 'Isa Tannin i a-Nazlah G d Baqah al-Hafira e The a-Sharqiya Baka al-Gharbiyah/ a-Sharqiyah M n a-Nazlah Araba Nazlat ‘Isa Nazlat Qabatiya הגדה Westהמערבית e al-Wusta Kh.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palestinian Economy in East Jerusalem, Some Pertinent Aspects of Social Conditions Are Reviewed Below
    UNITED N A TIONS CONFERENC E ON T RADE A ND D EVELOPMENT Enduring annexation, isolation and disintegration UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Enduring annexation, isolation and disintegration New York and Geneva, 2013 Notes The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ______________________________________________________________________________ Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. ______________________________________________________________________________ Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, together with a copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint to be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat: Palais des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. ______________________________________________________________________________ The preparation of this report by the UNCTAD secretariat was led by Mr. Raja Khalidi (Division on Globalization and Development Strategies), with research contributions by the Assistance to the Palestinian People Unit and consultant Mr. Ibrahim Shikaki (Al-Quds University, Jerusalem), and statistical advice by Mr. Mustafa Khawaja (Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, Ramallah). ______________________________________________________________________________ Cover photo: Copyright 2007, Gugganij. Creative Commons, http://commons.wikimedia.org (accessed 11 March 2013). (Photo taken from the roof terrace of the Austrian Hospice of the Holy Family on Al-Wad Street in the Old City of Jerusalem, looking towards the south. In the foreground is the silver dome of the Armenian Catholic church “Our Lady of the Spasm”.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2017 Annual Report 2017 Had the Dubious Distinction Of
    . 2017 Annual Report 2017 had the dubious distinction of marking the 50th anniversary of Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip. After half a century, during which Israel’s policies have created profound changes that indicate long-term intentions, it is clear that this reality cannot be viewed as temporary. In 2017, B'Tselem continued to document and publicize human rights violations, while exposing the injustice, violence and dispossession at the very core of the occupation regime, challenging its legitimacy in Israel and abroad, and helping to expedite its end. 1 Table of Contents 2017 in Numbers 3 Executive Director's Note 5 Marking the 50th year of the Occupation 6 Photography Exhibit 6 Media Surrounding the 50th Anniversary 8 Reports Published in 2017 8 Getting Off Scot-Free 8 Made in Israel: Exploiting Palestinian Land for Treatment of Israeli Waste 9 Unprotected: Detention of Palestinian Teenagers in East Jerusalem 9 Fatalities 10 Trigger-Happy Responses to Clashes, Stone-throwing Incidents, Demonstrations or Evading Arrest 10 A Shoot-to-Kill Approach in Cases Defined as Assault 10 Security Forces Violence Against Palestinians 11 The Gaza Strip – A Decade of Siege 11 Separating Families 12 Gaza Executions 12 Prisoners and Detainees 13 Hunger Strike 13 Minor detainees 13 Communities Facing Demolitions and Displacement in Area C 14 Communities Under Imminent Threat of Transfer 14 An Increasingly Coercive Environment 15 Demolition Data 15 Demolitions in East Jerusalem 16 Batan al-Hawa -
    [Show full text]
  • Bethlehem 1 Cluster
    º¹DP UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs October 2005 Qalandiya Camp Closed Villages Project - Villages isolated fromÇ theirQalandiya natural centers º¹ ¬Palestinians without permits (the large majority of the population) village cluster Beit Duqqu P 144 Atarot ### ¬Ç usalem 3 170 Al Judeira Al Jib Closures ## Bir Nabala Beit 'Anan Jenin BethlehemAl Jib 1 cluster Ç Beit Ijza Closed village cluster ¬ Checkpoint ## ## AL Ram CP ## m al Lahim In 2000, villagers would access Bethlehem Ç#along# Earthmound Tulkarm Jerusalem 2 #¬# Al Qubeiba road 60 for their services. In 2005, road 60 and 367 Ç Qatanna Biddu 150 ¬ Partial Checkpoint Nablus 151 are closed to palestinian traffic making these villages Qalqiliya /" # Hizmah CP D inaccessible by car.ramot In ordercp Beit# Hanina to cope,# al#### Balad a local school Ç # ### ¬Ç D Road Gate Salfit has been created¬ and villagers walk to Beit Fajar for Beit Surik health services. /" Roadblock These villages are inaccessible by car Ramallah/Al Bireh Beit Surik º¹P Under / Overpass 152## Ç##Shu'fat Camp 'Anata Jericho Village Population¬ Constructed Barrier Jerusalem Khallet Zakariya 80 173 Projected Barrier Bethlehem Khallet Afana 40 /" Al 'Isawiya /" Under Construction Total Population: 120 Az Za'ayyemProhibited Roads Hebron ## º¹AzP Za'ayyem Zayem CP ¬Ç 174 Partially Prohibited Restricted Use Al 'Eizariya Comparing situations Pre-Intifada /" Totally Prohibited and August 2005 Closed village cluster Year 2000 Localities Abu Dis Jerusalem 1 August 2005 Closed Villages 'Arab al Jahalin
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation of Statistics in the “Israel-Palestine Scorecard”
    Documentation of Statistics in the “Israel-Palestine Scorecard” 1. Population Displacement The 1967 Palestinian exodus refers to the flight of around 280,000 to 325,000 Palestinians[a] out of the territories taken by Israel during and in the aftermath of the Six-Day War, including the demolition of the Palestinian villages of Imwas, Yalo, and Bayt Nuba, Surit, Beit Awwa, Beit Mirsem, Shuyukh, Al-Jiftlik, Agarith and Huseirat and the "emptying" of the refugee camps of Aqabat Jaber and ʿEin as-Sultan.[b] aBowker, Robert P. G. (2003). Palestinian Refugees: Mythology, Identity, and the Search for Peace. Lynne Rienner Publishers. ISBN 1-58826-202-2 bGerson, Allan (1978). Israel, the West Bank and International Law. Routledge. ISBN 0-7146-3091-8 cUN Doc A/8389 of 5 October 1971. Para 57. appearing in the Sunday Times (London) on 11 October 1970 2. Palestinian Land Annexed, Expropriated, or totally controlled by Israel Palestinian Loss of Land: 1967 - 2014 Since the 1993 Oslo Accords, the Palestinian Authority officially controls a geographically non-contiguous territory comprising approximately 11% of the West Bank (known as Area A) which remains subject to Israeli incursions. Area B (approx. 28%) is subject to joint Israeli-Palestinian military and Palestinian civil control. Area C (approx. 61%) is under full Israeli control. According to B'tselem, the vast majority of the Palestinian population lives in areas A and B and less than 1% of area C is designated for use by Palestinians, who are also unable to legally build in their own existing villages in area C due to Israeli authorities' restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons 2004 - 2005
    Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons 2004 - 2005 BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights i BADIL is a member of the Global Palestine Right of Return Coalition Preface The Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons is published annually by BADIL Resource Center. The Survey provides an overview of one of the largest and longest-standing unresolved refugee and displaced populations in the world today. It is estimated that two out of every five of today’s refugees are Palestinian. The Survey has several objectives: (1) It aims to provide basic information about Palestinian displacement – i.e., the circumstances of displacement, the size and characteristics of the refugee and displaced population, as well as the living conditions of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons; (2) It aims to clarify the framework governing protection and assistance for this displaced population; and (3) It sets out the basic principles for crafting durable solutions for Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons, consistent with international law, relevant United Nations Resolutions and best practice. In short, the Survey endeavors to address the lack of information or misinformation about Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons, and to counter political arguments that suggest that the issue of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons can be resolved outside the realm of international law and practice applicable to all other refugee and displaced populations. The Survey examines the status of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons on a thematic basis. Chapter One provides a short historical background to the root causes of Palestinian mass displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Briefing Notes 15 – 21 March 2006 | 1 U N I T E D N a T I O N S N a T I O N S U N I E S
    U N I TOCHA E D Weekly N A Briefing T I O NotesN S 15 – 21 March 2006 N A T I O N S| 1 U N I E S OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS P.O. Box 38712, East Jerusalem, Phone: (+972) 2-582 9962 / 582 5853, Fax: (+972) 2-582 5841 [email protected], www.ochaopt.org Protection of Civilians – Weekly Briefing Notes 15 – 21 March 2006 Of note this period • Due to the long closure of Karni crossing, the Gaza Strip has severe shortages of flour and other essential food commodities. Most of the bakeries across the Gaza Strip had to close down. Karni crossing reopened on 20 March for imports only but closed again after one hour. The crossing was open for imports only again on 21 March. • A 12-year-old Palestinian girl was killed in Nablus by the IDF during a military operation. 1. Physical Protection Casualties and protection1 40 30 20 10 0 Children Women Injuries Deaths Deaths Deaths Palestinians 34 2 1 - Israelis 15 1 - - Internationals ---- • 15 March: The Israeli Border Police fired tear gas canisters and rubber-coated metal bullets at Palestinian stone throwers in Shu'fat camp (Jerusalem) demonstrating against the construction of the Barrier. Two Israeli Border Police were injured in the clashes. • 15 March: Three Palestinian, attempting to fire homemade rockets from an area east of Rafah (Gaza Strip), where injured when one of the rockets prematurely exploded (These casualty figures are not included in the weekly total). • 15 March: Israeli Border Police fired live ammunition, killing a 20-year-old Palestinian man during demonstrations against construction of the Barrier in Kharbatha al Misbah (Ramallah).
    [Show full text]
  • Return of Organization Exempt from Income
    Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax Form 990 Under section 501 (c), 527, or 4947( a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except black lung benefit trust or private foundation) 2005 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service ► The o rganization may have to use a copy of this return to satisfy state re porting requirements. A For the 2005 calendar year , or tax year be and B Check If C Name of organization D Employer Identification number applicable Please use IRS change ta Qachange RICA IS RAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION 13-1664048 E; a11gne ^ci See Number and street (or P 0. box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number 0jretum specific 1 EAST 42ND STREET 1400 212-557-1600 Instruo retum uons City or town , state or country, and ZIP + 4 F nocounwro memos 0 Cash [X ,camel ded On° EW YORK , NY 10017 (sped ► [l^PP°ca"on pending • Section 501 (Il)c 3 organizations and 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trusts H and I are not applicable to section 527 organizations. must attach a completed Schedule A ( Form 990 or 990-EZ). H(a) Is this a group return for affiliates ? Yes OX No G Website : : / /AICF . WEBNET . ORG/ H(b) If 'Yes ,* enter number of affiliates' N/A J Organization type (deckonIyone) ► [ 501(c) ( 3 ) I (insert no ) ] 4947(a)(1) or L] 527 H(c) Are all affiliates included ? N/A Yes E__1 No Is(ITthis , attach a list) K Check here Q the organization' s gross receipts are normally not The 110- if more than $25 ,000 .
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Jerusalem” Has Jerusalem (Including the 1967 Rehavia Occupied and Annexed East Jerusalem) As Its Centre
    4 B?63 B?466 ! np ! 4 B?43 m D"D" np Migron Beituniya B?457 Modi'in Bei!r Im'in Beit Sira IsraelRei'ut-proclaimed “GKharbrathae al Miasbah ter JerusaBeitl 'Uer al Famuqa ” D" Kochav Ya'akov West 'Ein as Sultan Mitzpe Danny Maccabim D" Kochav Ya'akov np Ma'ale Mikhmas A System of Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid Deir Quruntul Kochav Ya'akov East ! Kafr 'Aqab Kh. Bwerah Mikhmas ! Beit Horon Duyuk at Tahta B?443 'Ein ad D" Rafat Jericho 'Ajanjul ya At Tira np ya ! Beit Liq Qalandi Kochav Ya'akov South ! Lebanon Neve Erez ¥ ! Qalandiya Giv'at Ze'ev D" a i r Jaba' y 60 Beit Duqqu Al Judeira 60 B? a S Beit Nuba D" B? e Atarot Ind. Zone S Ar Ram Ma'ale Hagit Bir Nabala Geva Binyamin n Al Jib a Beit Nuba Beit 'Anan e ! Giv'on Hahadasha n a r Mevo Horon r Beit Ijza e t B?4 i 3 Dahiyat al Bareed np 6 Jaber d Aqbat e Neve Ya'akov 4 M Yalu B?2 Nitaf 4 !< ! ! Kharayib Umm al Lahim Qatanna Hizma Al Qubeiba ! An Nabi Samwil Ein Prat Biddu el Almon Har Shmu !< Beit Hanina al Balad Kfar Adummim ! Beit Hanina D" 436 Vered Jericho Nataf B? 20 B? gat Ze'ev D" Dayr! Ayyub Pis A 4 1 Tra Beit Surik B?37 !< in Beit Tuul dar ! Har A JLR Beit Iksa Mizpe Jericho !< kfar Adummim !< 21 Ma'ale HaHamisha B? 'Anata !< !< Jordan Shu'fat !< !< A1 Train Ramat Shlomo np Ramot Allon D" Shu'fat !< !< Neve Ilan E1 !< Egypt Abu Ghosh !< B?1 French Hill Mishor Adumim ! B?1 Beit Naqquba !< !< !< ! Beit Nekofa Mevaseret Zion Ramat Eshkol 1 Israeli Police HQ Mesilat Zion B? Al 'Isawiya Lifta a Qulunyia ! Ma'alot Dafna Sho'eva ! !< Motza Sheikh Jarrah !< Motza Illit Mishor Adummim Ind.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monthly Report on the Israeli Violations Of
    ﺟﻣﻌﯾﺔ اﻟدراﺳﺎت اﻟﻌرﺑﯾﺔ Arab Studies Society ﻋﻠﻣﯾﺔ - ﻓﻛرﯾﺔ Scientific – Cultural ﻣرﻛز أﺑﺣﺎث اﻷراﺿﻲ Land Research Center اﻟﻘــدس Jerusalem The Monthly Report on the Israeli Violations of Palestinian Rights in the Occupied City of Jerusalem July- 2014 By: Monitoring Israeli Violations Team Land Research Center- Arab Studies Society Seventh Month of the Eighth Year ARAB STUDIES SOCIETY – Land Research Center (LRC) – Jerusalem Halhul – Main Road, Tel: 02-2217239 , Fax: 02-2290918 , P.O.Box: 35, E-mail: [email protected], URL: www.lrcj.org Israeli violations of Palestinians' rights to land and housing – July, 2014: Aggression Location Occurrence Demolition of houses and structures 2 - Self-demolition of a second floor in 1 a house 2 - Self demolition of a parking lot and Sur Baher basement Demolition threats 1 - Evacuation threat Jerusalem's Old City 1 House break-ins 91 - Break-ins for the sake of detaining The old city, Shu'fat, Beit Hanina, Sur Baher, 91 people, searching or vandalizing Umm Tuba, 'Anata, Abu Dis, al-Eizariya, Silwan Closures 24 - Set up of flying checkpoints The old city, Shu'fat, Beit Hanina, Anata, Abu 24 Dis, Silwan, ar-Ram, al-Eisawaya, at-Tur Colonial plans- residential units 243 - Approval of building new residential Colony of Pisgat Zeev 243 units Har Homa colony Colonists' attacks (in numbers) 12 - Setting fire to trees Jabal al-Mukabbir 20 - Attacks on individuals (including Beit Iksa, ar-Ram, Beit Hanina, Shu'fat, Jaffa 11 beating, torching, abducting) St., Sheikh Jarrah - Attacks on vehicles Sheikh Jarrah 7 - Attacks
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid Over Palestine
    Metula Majdal Shams Abil al-Qamh ! Neve Ativ Misgav Am Yuval Nimrod ! Al-Sanbariyya Kfar Gil'adi ZZ Ma'ayan Baruch ! MM Ein Qiniyye ! Dan Sanir Israeli Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid over Palestine Al-Sanbariyya DD Al-Manshiyya ! Dafna ! Mas'ada ! Al-Khisas Khan Al-Duwayr ¥ Huneen Al-Zuq Al-tahtani ! ! ! HaGoshrim Al Mansoura Margaliot Kiryat !Shmona al-Madahel G GLazGzaGza!G G G ! Al Khalsa Buq'ata Ethnic Cleansing and Population Transfer (1948 – present) G GBeGit GHil!GlelG Gal-'A!bisiyya Menara G G G G G G G Odem Qaytiyya Kfar Szold In order to establish exclusive Jewish-Israeli control, Israel has carried out a policy of population transfer. By fostering Jewish G G G!G SG dGe NG ehemia G AGl-NGa'iGmaG G G immigration and settlements, and forcibly displacing indigenous Palestinians, Israel has changed the demographic composition of the ¥ G G G G G G G !Al-Dawwara El-Rom G G G G G GAmG ir country. Today, 70% of Palestinians are refugees and internally displaced persons and approximately one half of the people are in exile G G GKfGar GB!lGumG G G G G G G SGalihiya abroad. None of them are allowed to return. L e b a n o n Shamir U N D ii s e n g a g e m e n tt O b s e rr v a tt ii o n F o rr c e s Al Buwayziyya! NeoG t MG oGrdGecGhaGi G ! G G G!G G G G Al-Hamra G GAl-GZawG iyGa G G ! Khiyam Al Walid Forcible transfer of Palestinians continues until today, mainly in the Southern District (Beersheba Region), the historical, coastal G G G G GAl-GMuGftskhara ! G G G G G G G Lehavot HaBashan Palestinian towns ("mixed towns") and in the occupied West Bank, in particular in the Israeli-prolaimed “greater Jerusalem”, the Jordan G G G G G G G Merom Golan Yiftah G G G G G G G Valley and the southern Hebron District.
    [Show full text]