Lester B. Pearson's Role in the Creation of the State of Israel Comments By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Lester B. Pearson’s role in the creation of the State of Israel Comments by Speaker Yuli Edelstein of the Knesset on January 20, 2014 welcoming Prime Minster Stephen Harper to the Knesset: “More than 66 years ago, on 29 November 1947, a historic decision was made that changed the reality of Middle East from one end to the other and had a profound influence on the history of the Modern Age. The United Nations General Assembly accepted the partition resolution, with the end of British Mandate over this country, and the establishment of a homeland for the Jewish people after two thousand years of exile and diaspora, named the State of Israel. ”Lester Pearson, who was then a diplomat, and later Prime Minister of Canada and Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, had a huge influence on the “Multipolar consensus which led to the adoption of the partition plan. Through diplomatic means, Pearson made sure that every party would recognize that a solution would have to include the recognition of the right of the Jewish people to have a country, here in our historical Homeland. In his memoirs he wrote: "I never had a doubt that this problem is unsolvable without recognizing a Jewish state in the Land of Israel. For me it was always the center of the issue. A Jewish state in the land of Israel, a national home, it is something that I felt that it was a sine qua non for every arrangement". “Sixty-five years later, Pearson's words still have meaning and validity. The basis for all of the arrangements and the heart of the issue is the recognition of the Jewish state in the land of Israel. This is the basis that is sine qua non for all arrangements.” (Translation from the official Knesset transcript in Hebrew) For more information : Andrew Cardozo: [email protected] www.thepearsoncentre.ca 34 Adelaide St.Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1S 3S1 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Imagining Peace Operations 2030
GCSP 25th Anniversary The New Normal? Imagining Peace Operations 2030 25 November 2020, GCSP, Online Speakers’ Biographies Mr Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah President, Centre for Strategies and Security in Sahel Sahara; Former UN Special Representative of the Secretary General to Burundi and Somalia; Former Minister for Foreign Affairs of Mauritania; and Member of the Panel of Experts on Peacebuilding University Studies Economy and Political Science in Grenoble and Paris. 1969 / 1984: Minister of Commerce and Transportatio Amb;assador to the United States; to the Benelux States and the European Union in Brussels, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation. 1985 / 1996: United Nations as Director at Headquarters, New York and Special Representative to the Secretary General (SRSG) in conflict affected Burundi 1993 / 95. 1996 / 2002, World Bank as the manager of the Think Tank Global Coalition for Africa chaired by Robert Mc Namara in Washington DC. 2002 / 2011 back to the United Nations as the Special Representative of the Secretary General to West Africa and later to Somalia. Then to the Headquarters for Special missions. In 2015 and 2019 member of the UN Secretary General Advisory Group of Experts on the Review of Peace Building Architecture and leader of the Secretary General Team to review the UN Office for the Central Africa Region (UNOCA). Founding member of Transparency International and is member of its Consultative Council. He also is member of a number of Advisory Boards of profits and non-profits organizations. He has published two books on his UN experience on conflict management: la Diplomatie Pyromane in 1996, Calmann Levy France; "Burundi on the Brink in 2000, US Institute of Peace and recently his Mémoires: ‘’Plutôt mourir que faillir " Ed Descartes et Cie, Paris 2017 translated in Arabic 2020.
[Show full text]
Understanding Stephen Harper
HARPER Edited by Teresa Healy www.policyalternatives.ca Photo: Hanson/THE Tom CANADIAN PRESS Understanding Stephen Harper The long view Steve Patten CANAdIANs Need to understand the political and ideological tem- perament of politicians like Stephen Harper — men and women who aspire to political leadership. While we can gain important insights by reviewing the Harper gov- ernment’s policies and record since the 2006 election, it is also essential that we step back and take a longer view, considering Stephen Harper’s two decades of political involvement prior to winning the country’s highest political office. What does Harper’s long record of engagement in conservative politics tell us about his political character? This chapter is organized around a series of questions about Stephen Harper’s political and ideological character. Is he really, as his support- ers claim, “the smartest guy in the room”? To what extent is he a con- servative ideologue versus being a political pragmatist? What type of conservatism does he embrace? What does the company he keeps tell us about his political character? I will argue that Stephen Harper is an economic conservative whose early political motivations were deeply ideological. While his keen sense of strategic pragmatism has allowed him to make peace with both conservative populism and the tradition- alism of social conservatism, he continues to marginalize red toryism within the Canadian conservative family. He surrounds himself with Governance 25 like-minded conservatives and retains a long-held desire to transform Canada in his conservative image. The smartest guy in the room, or the most strategic? When Stephen Harper first came to the attention of political observers, it was as one of the leading “thinkers” behind the fledgling Reform Party of Canada.
[Show full text]
Enhancing European Military and Police Contributions to UN Peacekeeping
Enhancing European Military and Police Contributions to UN Peacekeeping FEBRUARY 2013 Demand for United Nations peacekeeping has been a consistent feature of the post–Cold War international peace and security agenda. Today, the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations manages sixteen missions across the globe, using more than 80,000 troops, more than 13,000 police, and nearly 2,000 military observers, in addition to approximately 20,000 civilian personnel. Given its expanded size and needs, the burden of supporting UN On October 24–25, 2012, the peacekeeping must necessarily be shared among UN member states in various second regional roundtable of the ways. The US, Japan, and the European Union (EU) member states together International Peace Institute– fund around 80 percent of the UN peacekeeping budget, while “boots on the Pearson Centre Being a Peace - ground” are largely provided by African and Central and South Asian member keeper series took place in Berlin, states, which together provide 71 percent of the UN’s uniformed personnel. Germany, hosted by the Center for However, the notion that Western countries are absent from UN operations is International Peace Operations (ZIF) partially misleading. The sixteen European countries represented at the Berlin with the support of the Directorate roundtable were contributing 5,492 uniformed personnel—around 6 percent for Strategic Affairs of the French of total uniformed contributions to UN peace operations. European personnel Ministry of Defense and the Federal are largely concentrated in UN operations in the Middle East; only 383 from Foreign Office of Germany. With the this group are deployed to the six UN missions in sub-Saharan Africa (0.5 impending NATO withdrawal from percent of the total uniformed peacekeeping personnel in that region).
[Show full text]
Peace First: Canada's Role in Peace Operations
! ' , ,, ! : ,: :: ! ! ! ! “We! can’t! address! today’s! challenges! with! yesterday’s! mindset,”! emphasized! the! United! Nations! Secretary<General! Ban! Ki<moon! calling! for! greater! member! state! support! for! peace! operations.! Canada! is! still! internationally! recognized! for! past! achievements! in! key! areas! pertaining! to! peace! operations,! especially! peacekeeping.! Since! the! call! by! Canada's! then< Minister!of!External!Affairs,!Lester!B.!Pearson!for!the!creation!of!a!multinational!armed!force!to! go!into!Egypt!to!help!restore!peace!and!prevent!a!major!international!confrontation,!Canada! has!been!associated!with!the!fundamentals!of!peacekeeping.!Canada!has!been!a!key!player!in! securing!major!achievements,!which!are!relevant!for!peace!operations:!! • The!establishment!of!the!Blue!Helmets!(1956<!the!UN!Peacekeepers);! • The! Ottawa! Convention! or! the!Mine!Ban! Treaty! (1999<! the! Convention! on! the! Prohibition!of!the!Use,!Stockpiling,!Production!and!Transfer!of!Anti<Personnel!Mines!and! on!their!Destruction);! • The! Kimberley! Process! (2003<! preventing! "conflict! diamonds"! from! entering! the! mainstream! rough!diamond!market! following! recommendations! by! the! Canadian! Ambassador!to!the!United!Nations,!Robert!Fowler);! • The!Responsibility!to!Protect!(2005<!emphasizing!the!state's!responsibility!to!protect!its! people! from! major! violations! of! human! rights,! which! followed! the! report! by! the!International!Commission!on!Intervention!and!State!Sovereignty!(ICISS),!an!effort!led! by!the!Canadian!government).!!
[Show full text]
Broadening the Base of United Nations Troop- and Police-Contributing Countries
Broadening the Base of United Nations Troop- and Police-Contributing Countries Providing for Peacekeeping No. 1 Alex J. Bellamy and Paul D. Williams AUGUST 2012 INTERNATIONAL PEACE INSTITUTE Cover Photo: Nigerian soldiers ABOUT THE AUTHORS serving with the United Nations- African Union Mission in Darfur ALEX J. BELLAMY is Professor of International Security at (UNAMID) during an inspection visit Griffith University, Australia, and Non-resident Senior by General Martin Luther Agwai to El Adviser at the International Peace Institute. Daean Team Group Site in South Darfur, March 10, 2008. ALBANY Email: [email protected] ASSOCIATES/STUART PRICE. PAUL D. WILLIAMS is Associate Professor in the Elliott School of International Affairs at the George Washington Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper represent those of the University, USA, and Non-resident Senior Adviser at the author and not necessarily those of International Peace Institute. IPI. IPI welcomes consideration of a Email: [email protected] wide range of perspectives in the pursuit of a well-informed debate on critical policies and issues in interna - tional affairs. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks go to Adam Smith, Arturo Sotomayor, and Andrea IPI Publications Adam Lupel, Editor and Senior Fellow Baumann for their comments on an earlier draft of this Marie O’Reilly, Publications Officer paper, as well as to the participants at the workshop on troop and police contributions to UN peacekeeping hosted Suggested Citation: Alex J. Bellamy and Paul D. Williams, by the International Peace Institute on February 13, 2012. “Broadening the Base of United Providing for Peacekeeping is an independent research Nations Troop- and Police- Contributing Countries,” Providing for project established to broaden the understanding of the Peacekeeping No.
[Show full text]
Insight Trudeau Without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations
IRPP Harper without Jeers, Insight Trudeau without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations September 2016 | No. 8 Christopher Dunn Summary ■■ Stephen Harper’s approach to intergovernmental relations shifted somewhat from the “open federalism” that informed his initial years as prime minister toward greater multilateral engagement with provincial governments and certain unilateral moves. ■■ Harper left a legacy of smaller government and greater provincial self-reliance. ■■ Justin Trudeau focuses on collaboration and partnership, including with Indigenous peoples, but it is too early to assess results. Sommaire ■■ En matière de relations intergouvernementales, l’approche de Stephen Harper s’est progressivement éloignée du « fédéralisme ouvert » de ses premières années au pouvoir au profit d’un plus fort engagement multilatéral auprès des provinces, ponctué ici et là de poussées d’unilatéralisme. ■■ Gouvernement réduit et autonomie provinciale accrue sont deux éléments clés de l’héritage de Stephen Harper. ■■ Justin Trudeau privilégie la collaboration et les partenariats, y compris avec les peuples autochtones, mais il est encore trop tôt pour mesurer les résultats de sa démarche. WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS IN CANADA? Surprises. In October 2015, we had an election with a surprise ending. The Liberal Party, which had been third in the polls for months, won a clear majority. The new prime minister, Justin Trudeau, provided more surprises, engaging in a whirl- wind of talks with first ministers as a group and with social partners that the previous government, led by Stephen Harper, had largely ignored. He promised a new covenant with Indigenous peoples, the extent of which surprised even them. Change was in the air.
[Show full text]
Was Stephen Harper Really Tough on Crime? a Systems and Symbolic Action Analysis
Was Stephen Harper Really Tough on Crime? A Systems and Symbolic Action Analysis A thesis submitted to The College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In partial fulfilment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Sociology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Mark Jacob Stobbe ©Mark Jacob Stobbe, September 2018. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirement for a postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or part, for scholarly purposes, may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis was done. It is understood that any copying, publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Request for permission to copy or use of whole or part of this thesis may be addressed to: Department of Sociology University of Saskatchewan 1019 - 9 Campus Drive Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 5A5 OR College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan Room 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon SK Canada S7N 5C9 i ABSTRACT In 2006, the Hon.
[Show full text]
Shaking the Movers: Youth Rights and Media
LESSON PLAN Level: Grades 9 to 10 About the Author: Matthew Johnson, Director of Education, MediaSmarts Duration: 1 to 1/2 hours This lesson was produced with support from: Landon Pearson Centre for the Study of Childhood and Children's Rights, Canadian Teachers’ Federation and UNICEF. Shaking the Movers: Youth Rights and Media This lesson is part of USE, UNDERSTAND & CREATE: A Digital Literacy Framework for Canadian Schools: http://mediasmarts.ca/teacher-resources/digital-literacy-framework. Overview Students will discuss the concept of human rights and then learn how these ideas led to the drafting of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. They then consider five particular Articles of the Convention and, in groups, discuss how these relate to their media use. Students debate which Articles are most important to their media experiences and defend their choices to the class. Learning Outcomes Students will: learn about the concept of human rights learn about the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child discuss how Articles of the Convention apply to their media use lead a small-group discussion collaborate with an expert group present and defend opinions write a persuasive essay Preparation and Materials Teachers wishing a fuller background on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child may consult the UNICEF Web page at http://www.unicef.org/crc/. Photocopy the handout Media Rights. www.mediasmarts.ca 1 © 2016 MediaSmarts Shaking the Movers ● Lesson Plan ● Grades 9 – 10 Procedure What are Rights? Start by asking the class what they know about the term rights: When we talk about having the right to do something, what does it mean? (That you can’t be prevented from doing that thing.) Following on the last point, introduce students to the idea that some rights protect your ability to do things (e.g.
[Show full text]
What Makes Shaking the Movers Unique?
WHAT MAKES SHAKING THE MOVERS UNIQUE? Prepared by Virginia Caputo, PhD. Landon Pearson Centre for the Study of Childhood and Children’s Rights Carleton University April 2018 Landon Pearson Centre for the Study of Childhood and Children’s Rights Carleton University, A735 Loeb Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6 www.carleton.ca/landonpearsoncentre April 2018 LANDON PEARSON CENTRE page 2 Introduction: Shaking the Movers (STM) is a youth-led, youth-driven participatory model focused on engaging children and young people with their civil and political rights. Created by the Landon Pearson Centre for the Study of Childhood and Children’s Rights at Carleton University in 2007, it is the only youth-centred participatory model in Canada that uses a rights-based framework grounded in the Guiding Principles and Articles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). This rights-based approach views children’s and young people’s rights in relation to those of adults in a complementary rather than adversarial positioning. Children’s rights, like adults’ rights, are inalienable, indivisible, and universal entitlements that recognize the inherent dignity of children who live with adults in a shared humanity. What is often misunderstood about the concept of children’s rights is the perception that these rights compete with those of adults. This assumption incorrectly casts rights in a zero-sum equation; that is, either you uphold children’s rights or you support adults’ rights. The STM model demonstrates in a substantive way that this is not the case. Rights are relational, contextual and sustainable. Apart from its participatory and rights-based approach, the Shaking the Movers model uniquely provides an ethical environment for children’s participation by carefully transferring power to children who are central in the model design.
[Show full text]
Prime Ministers and Government Spending: a Retrospective by Jason Clemens and Milagros Palacios
FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN May 2017 Prime Ministers and Government Spending: A Retrospective by Jason Clemens and Milagros Palacios Summary however, is largely explained by the rapid drop in expenditures following World War I. This essay measures the level of per-person Among post-World War II prime ministers, program spending undertaken annually by each Louis St. Laurent oversaw the largest annual prime minister, adjusting for inflation, since average increase in per-person spending (7.0%), 1870. 1867 to 1869 were excluded due to a lack though this spending was partly influenced by of inflation data. the Korean War. Per-person spending spiked during World Our current prime minister, Justin Trudeau, War I (under Prime Minister Sir Robert Borden) has the third-highest average annual per-per- but essentially returned to pre-war levels once son spending increases (5.2%). This is almost the war ended. The same is not true of World a full percentage point higher than his father, War II (William Lyon Mackenzie King). Per- Pierre E. Trudeau, who recorded average an- person spending stabilized at a permanently nual increases of 4.5%. higher level after the end of that war. Prime Minister Joe Clark holds the record The highest single year of per-person spend- for the largest average annual post-World ing ($8,375) between 1870 and 2017 was in the War II decline in per-person spending (4.8%), 2009 recession under Prime Minister Harper. though his tenure was less than a year. Prime Minister Arthur Meighen (1920 – 1921) Both Prime Ministers Brian Mulroney and recorded the largest average annual decline Jean Chretien recorded average annual per- in per-person spending (-23.1%).
[Show full text]
In the National Interest: Canadian Foreign Policy and the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 1909–2009
University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2011 In the National Interest: Canadian Foreign Policy and the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 1909–2009 University of Calgary Press Donaghy, G., & Carroll, M. (Eds.). (2011). In the National Interest: Canadian Foreign Policy and the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 1909-2009. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/48549 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca University of Calgary Press www.uofcpress.com IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST Canadian Foreign Policy and the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 1909–2009 Greg Donaghy and Michael K. Carroll, Editors ISBN 978-1-55238-561-6 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright.
[Show full text]
E Turmoil Surrounding the Prorogation of Canada's 40Th Parliament & The
!e Turmoil Surrounding the Prorogation of Canada’s 40th Parliament & the Crown Kenneth Munro* #e prorogation of the $rst session of Can- #e $rst is the exercise of the governor gener- ada’s fortieth Parliament awakened Canadians al’s prerogative powers; the second is our par- to the intricacies of their political system and it liamentary system of responsible government. brought the Canadian Crown to the fore of our #e governor general represents the Queen and history once more. Acceding to her Prime Min- exercises all of her powers derived from statute ister’s advice on that cold, dreary, snow-covered and common law2 within our federal sphere morning of 4 December 2008, the Governor of jurisdiction. Parliament has conferred wide General, Michaëlle Jean, sparked the interest of powers on our Crown to administer and to leg- Canadians in their monarchical institutions. A islate. Since these are delegated powers, they docile and politically bored population refused are subject to change by Parliament.3 But the in large numbers to cast their ballots in a general governor general also exercises prerogative and election in October. Less than two months later, reserve powers in her capacity as the Queen’s the prorogation of the $rst session of their new representative. Prerogative powers are those Parliament sparked a new-$red enthusiasm for upon which she must seek advice, while reserve politics, and throughout the country Canadians powers are those she can exercise alone, without became constitutional experts overnight. #ey advice. Some of the governor general’s preroga- voiced their opinions on talk shows, at work and tive powers have been restricted in Canada by at leisure, in bars and over formal dinners, sud- statute or by order-in-council.
[Show full text]