DOCSLIB.ORG

E Turmoil Surrounding the Prorogation of Canada's 40Th Parliament & The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
E Turmoil Surrounding the Prorogation of Canada's 40Th Parliament & The !e Turmoil Surrounding the Prorogation of Canada’s 40th Parliament & the Crown Kenneth Munro* #e prorogation of the $rst session of Can- #e $rst is the exercise of the governor gener- ada’s fortieth Parliament awakened Canadians al’s prerogative powers; the second is our par- to the intricacies of their political system and it liamentary system of responsible government. brought the Canadian Crown to the fore of our #e governor general represents the Queen and history once more. Acceding to her Prime Min- exercises all of her powers derived from statute ister’s advice on that cold, dreary, snow-covered and common law2 within our federal sphere morning of 4 December 2008, the Governor of jurisdiction. Parliament has conferred wide General, Michaëlle Jean, sparked the interest of powers on our Crown to administer and to leg- Canadians in their monarchical institutions. A islate. Since these are delegated powers, they docile and politically bored population refused are subject to change by Parliament.3 But the in large numbers to cast their ballots in a general governor general also exercises prerogative and election in October. Less than two months later, reserve powers in her capacity as the Queen’s the prorogation of the $rst session of their new representative. Prerogative powers are those Parliament sparked a new-$red enthusiasm for upon which she must seek advice, while reserve politics, and throughout the country Canadians powers are those she can exercise alone, without became constitutional experts overnight. #ey advice. Some of the governor general’s preroga- voiced their opinions on talk shows, at work and tive powers have been restricted in Canada by at leisure, in bars and over formal dinners, sud- statute or by order-in-council. Order-in-coun- denly manifesting astonishing skill at discuss- cil P.C. 3374, given royal assent on 25 October ing the strengths and weaknesses of their sys- 1935, enhanced the powers of the prime min- tem of government with particular emphasis on ster vis-à-vis his cabinet colleagues and gover- the Maple Crown. Many based their opinions nor general. Among other things, this order-in- about the Crown on whether or not they liked council provided that only the prime minister the Prime Minister. Only a handful focused on could recommend dissolution and convocation the essential issue of the prorogation: was Prime of Parliament. As John Diefenbaker said, this Minister Stephen Harper abusing the preroga- order-in-council changed, in e%ect, the prime tive and reserve powers of the Crown for parti- minister’s role from one of primus inter pares san political advantage? #is issue was raised by ($rst among equals) to one of primus sine pari- David Smith over a decade ago in his book !e bus ($rst without equals).4 Invisible Crown1 and it remains an unresolved question for constitutional observers today. #e actions of Stephen Harper in Decem- ber bring to the fore a pressing concern with In discussing the question of prorogation, respect to the Monarchy in Canada: preventing two aspects of our constitution come into play. the prime minister and premiers from abusing Constitutional Forum constitutionnel !" the Crown’s reserve powers. When granted to was not overwhelming support for the coalition Canada in 1848, responsible government im- and because the coalition partners required the plied that the governor general “would act on support of a regionally based party to govern, the advice of his ministers under normal cir- there was concern it would not hold together. cumstances.”5 Under the 1935 order-in-council, the prime minister has assumed far more power Faced with this reality, the Governor Gen- since only he or she can o%er the governor gen- eral had little choice in the matter. Barbara eral advice on a myriad of issues. Normally, the Messamore has made this point with utmost governor general must act solely on the advice clarity: “Only in the most extraordinary cir- of his or her Canadian $rst minister. At the cumstances would the governor-general be same time, one of the key roles of the governor warranted in refusing the advice of the prime 6 general is to safeguard the constitution. One of minister.” As Messamore indicated, Stephen the dilemmas faced by the governor general is Harper was entitled to buy time “to see if he can to resolve any con'ict between her duty to act garner su(cient support and to test the abil- on the advice of her prime minister and her ity of the coalition to maintain the allegiance 7 duty to safeguard the constitution. A danger of enough Liberal, NDP and Bloc members.” to our monarchical system and to our unwrit- Under our constitution, the governor general ten or conventional constitution arises when a must accept the advice of the prime minister in prime minister advises the governor general to such matters. If she were to refuse Harper’s re- use the royal prerogative for partisan political quest for a prorogation, the Governor General advantage. Last December, did the Governor would have had to $nd another prime minister General adequately resolve the requirement to to take responsibility for her actions. Observing accept her Prime Minister’s advice on the one public opinion which appeared divided, she was hand, and the need to protect the constitution evidently not about to trust the reliability of the on the other? proposed coalition supported by the Bloc as an alternative to the existing Harper government. #e Governor General received her Prime In addition, her advisors undoubtedly remind- Minister at Government House when it ap- ed her of precedents. peared that he would face certain defeat in the House of Commons on 8 December 2008. At Early in the post-Confederation period, this two-hour meeting, Stephen Harper asked such a precedent occurred. Less than a year a)er for, and was granted, a prorogation of the $rst the October 1872 general election, Prime Min- session of the fortieth Parliament, despite the ister John A. Macdonald asked Governor Gen- fact she had just opened it on 19 November. Be- eral Lord Du%erin for prorogation in the midst fore the visit of her Prime Minister, Michaëlle of the Paci$c Scandal. #e Liberals revealed Jean had received a memo, signed by all op- that both Macdonald and Cartier had received position members, which proposed a coalition campaign funds for that election from Sir Hugh between the Liberal Party of Canada and New Allan, president of the Canada Paci$c Compa- Democratic Party (NDP) supported by the Bloc ny. He hoped to secure the charter to build the Québécois. #e Governor General faced a di- transcontinental railway through these bribes. lemma: her Prime Minister wanted to prorogue Fearing loss on a non-con$dence vote, Macdon- the session of Parliament which had just begun ald asked Du%erin to prorogue the session of and which was very likely to see the government Parliament rather than allow a vote on adjourn- fall on a vote of non-con$dence, and the oppo- ment. Some Conservatives signed a memoran- sition parties claimed they could provide her dum pledging their support for a Liberal minis- with a new prime minister to carry on the af- try under Alexander Mackenzie. Du%erin faced fairs of state, a necessity if she were to reject the similar gratuitous advice as did Michaëlle Jean advice of her Prime Minister. On the one hand, in December: warnings about dangers to the the Prime Minister appeared to many to be constitution if the Governor General were to ac- abusing the royal prerogative for political gain; cept the advice of the Prime Minister. A)er ag- on the other hand, polls indicated that there onizing re'ection, Du%erin granted Macdonald !& Volume 18, Number 1, 2009 prorogation. In the end, Parliament reconvened reserve power of the Crown for partisan advan- in October and Macdonald, faced with certain tage. #roughout our history, and particularly defeat on a non-con$dence vote, resigned.8 Al- in recent times, there are disquieting signs that though Stephen Harper has not been accused of the reserve powers of the Crown can be used by any wrongdoing, the 1873 request by Macdon- power-lusting prime ministers and premiers for ald is similar to Harper’s: the Governor General their own partisan advantage. Consequently, can only refuse prime ministerial advice on the the governor general and lieutenant governors rarest of occasions. must be very wary and wise in using the roy- al prerogative to protect the constitution. #is Besides this precedent from the nineteenth undertaking is not easy under our system of century, Michaëlle Jean’s advisors undoubtedly responsible government in Canada, but in this also reminded her of the 1926 constitutional instance, our Governor General walked the crisis. In that year, the Governor General, Lord constitutional tightrope well in accepting her Byng, denied the request of his Liberal prime Prime Minister’s advice while protecting the minister, William Lyon Mackenzie King, to dis- constitution at the same time. solve Parliament so that he could avoid a mo- tion of non-con$dence in the House and call an election. Mackenzie King had made the request Notes because the Liberals, caught up in a customs * Ken Munro, Department of History and Classics, department scandal, faced certain defeat. Un- University of Alberta. der our system of responsible government, the 1 David E. Smith, !e Invisible Crown: !e First prime minister has the right to make such a re- Principle of Canadian Government (Toronto: quest. Controversy quickly erupted, however, University of Toronto Press, 1995) at 57. when the Governor General, using the reserve 2 James R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding Stephen Harper
    HARPER Edited by Teresa Healy www.policyalternatives.ca Photo: Hanson/THE Tom CANADIAN PRESS Understanding Stephen Harper The long view Steve Patten CANAdIANs Need to understand the political and ideological tem- perament of politicians like Stephen Harper — men and women who aspire to political leadership. While we can gain important insights by reviewing the Harper gov- ernment’s policies and record since the 2006 election, it is also essential that we step back and take a longer view, considering Stephen Harper’s two decades of political involvement prior to winning the country’s highest political office. What does Harper’s long record of engagement in conservative politics tell us about his political character? This chapter is organized around a series of questions about Stephen Harper’s political and ideological character. Is he really, as his support- ers claim, “the smartest guy in the room”? To what extent is he a con- servative ideologue versus being a political pragmatist? What type of conservatism does he embrace? What does the company he keeps tell us about his political character? I will argue that Stephen Harper is an economic conservative whose early political motivations were deeply ideological. While his keen sense of strategic pragmatism has allowed him to make peace with both conservative populism and the tradition- alism of social conservatism, he continues to marginalize red toryism within the Canadian conservative family. He surrounds himself with Governance 25 like-minded conservatives and retains a long-held desire to transform Canada in his conservative image. The smartest guy in the room, or the most strategic? When Stephen Harper first came to the attention of political observers, it was as one of the leading “thinkers” behind the fledgling Reform Party of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight Trudeau Without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations
    IRPP Harper without Jeers, Insight Trudeau without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations September 2016 | No. 8 Christopher Dunn Summary ■■ Stephen Harper’s approach to intergovernmental relations shifted somewhat from the “open federalism” that informed his initial years as prime minister toward greater multilateral engagement with provincial governments and certain unilateral moves. ■■ Harper left a legacy of smaller government and greater provincial self-reliance. ■■ Justin Trudeau focuses on collaboration and partnership, including with Indigenous peoples, but it is too early to assess results. Sommaire ■■ En matière de relations intergouvernementales, l’approche de Stephen Harper s’est progressivement éloignée du « fédéralisme ouvert » de ses premières années au pouvoir au profit d’un plus fort engagement multilatéral auprès des provinces, ponctué ici et là de poussées d’unilatéralisme. ■■ Gouvernement réduit et autonomie provinciale accrue sont deux éléments clés de l’héritage de Stephen Harper. ■■ Justin Trudeau privilégie la collaboration et les partenariats, y compris avec les peuples autochtones, mais il est encore trop tôt pour mesurer les résultats de sa démarche. WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS IN CANADA? Surprises. In October 2015, we had an election with a surprise ending. The Liberal Party, which had been third in the polls for months, won a clear majority. The new prime minister, Justin Trudeau, provided more surprises, engaging in a whirl- wind of talks with first ministers as a group and with social partners that the previous government, led by Stephen Harper, had largely ignored. He promised a new covenant with Indigenous peoples, the extent of which surprised even them. Change was in the air.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Stephen Harper Really Tough on Crime? a Systems and Symbolic Action Analysis
    Was Stephen Harper Really Tough on Crime? A Systems and Symbolic Action Analysis A thesis submitted to The College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In partial fulfilment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Sociology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Mark Jacob Stobbe ©Mark Jacob Stobbe, September 2018. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirement for a postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or part, for scholarly purposes, may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis was done. It is understood that any copying, publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Request for permission to copy or use of whole or part of this thesis may be addressed to: Department of Sociology University of Saskatchewan 1019 - 9 Campus Drive Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 5A5 OR College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan Room 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon SK Canada S7N 5C9 i ABSTRACT In 2006, the Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Ministers and Government Spending: a Retrospective by Jason Clemens and Milagros Palacios
    FRASER RESEARCH BULLETIN May 2017 Prime Ministers and Government Spending: A Retrospective by Jason Clemens and Milagros Palacios Summary however, is largely explained by the rapid drop in expenditures following World War I. This essay measures the level of per-person Among post-World War II prime ministers, program spending undertaken annually by each Louis St. Laurent oversaw the largest annual prime minister, adjusting for inflation, since average increase in per-person spending (7.0%), 1870. 1867 to 1869 were excluded due to a lack though this spending was partly influenced by of inflation data. the Korean War. Per-person spending spiked during World Our current prime minister, Justin Trudeau, War I (under Prime Minister Sir Robert Borden) has the third-highest average annual per-per- but essentially returned to pre-war levels once son spending increases (5.2%). This is almost the war ended. The same is not true of World a full percentage point higher than his father, War II (William Lyon Mackenzie King). Per- Pierre E. Trudeau, who recorded average an- person spending stabilized at a permanently nual increases of 4.5%. higher level after the end of that war. Prime Minister Joe Clark holds the record The highest single year of per-person spend- for the largest average annual post-World ing ($8,375) between 1870 and 2017 was in the War II decline in per-person spending (4.8%), 2009 recession under Prime Minister Harper. though his tenure was less than a year. Prime Minister Arthur Meighen (1920 – 1921) Both Prime Ministers Brian Mulroney and recorded the largest average annual decline Jean Chretien recorded average annual per- in per-person spending (-23.1%).
    [Show full text]
  • In the National Interest: Canadian Foreign Policy and the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 1909–2009
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2011 In the National Interest: Canadian Foreign Policy and the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 1909–2009 University of Calgary Press Donaghy, G., & Carroll, M. (Eds.). (2011). In the National Interest: Canadian Foreign Policy and the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 1909-2009. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/48549 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca University of Calgary Press www.uofcpress.com IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST Canadian Foreign Policy and the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 1909–2009 Greg Donaghy and Michael K. Carroll, Editors ISBN 978-1-55238-561-6 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • LOUIS ST-LAURENT When Governments Got Things Done
    MARCH 2021 The Legacy of LOUIS ST-LAURENT When governments got things done Also INSIDE: An Israel-Iran Canada’s lacklustre Crisis in academic Solving the Maritime peace deal? COVID response freedom fishery dispute 1 PublishedPublished by by the the Macdonald-Laurier Macdonald-Laurier Institute Institute PublishedBrianBrian Lee LeeBrianby Crowley, Crowley,the Lee Macdonald-Laurier Crowley,Managing Managing Managing Director, Director, Director [email protected] [email protected] Institute David Watson,JamesJames DeputyAnderson, Anderson, Managing Managing Managing Director, Editor, Editor, Editorial Inside Inside Policy and Policy Operations Brian Lee Crowley, Managing Director, [email protected] David McDonough, Deputy Editor James Anderson,ContributingContributing Managing writers:Editor, writers: Inside Policy Contributing writers: ThomasThomas S. S.Axworthy Axworthy PastAndrewAndrew contributors Griffith Griffith BenjaminBenjamin Perrin Perrin Thomas S. Axworthy Andrew Griffith Benjamin Perrin Mary-Jane BennettDonaldDonald Barry Barry Jeremy DepowStanleyStanley H. H. Hartt HarttMarcus Kolga MikeMike J.Priaro Berkshire Priaro Miller Massimo BergaminiDonald Barry Peter DeVries Stanley H. HarttAudrey Laporte Mike Priaro Jack Mintz Derek BurneyKenKen Coates Coates Brian Dijkema PaulPaul Kennedy KennedyBrad Lavigne ColinColin RobertsonRobert Robertson P. Murphy Ken Coates Paul Kennedy Colin Robertson Charles Burton Ujjal Dosanjh Ian Lee Dwight Newman BrianBrian Lee Lee Crowley Crowley AudreyAudrey Laporte Laporte RogerRoger Robinson Robinson Catherine
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping Commitment: Resolving Canada's Strategy Gap In
    SHAPING COMMITMENT: RESolving Canada’S STRATEGY GAP IN AFGHANISTAN AND BEYOND Colonel D. Craig Hilton Canadian Army July 2007 Visit our website for other free publication downloads http://www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/ To rate this publication click here. This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave, Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. ***** All Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) publications are available on the SSI homepage for electronic dissemination. Hard copies of this report also may be ordered from our homepage. SSI's homepage address is: www.StrategicStudies Institute.army.mil. ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please subscribe on our homepage at www.StrategicStudiesInstitute. army.mil/newsletter/. ISBN 1-58487-299-3 ii PREFACE The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Survey Invitation 2011 Federal Election Invitation Survey Questionnaire
    Voter Survey Invitation 2011 Federal Election Invitation Survey Questionnaire [FOR FULL PANEL] As you may know the federal election is just around the corner. To help us out with our election polling, we have some questions that we are asking the entire i-Say panel... 1. As you may know, a federal election will happen on May 2, 2011. How likely are you to vote in this election? Are you…? Absolutely certain Very likely Somewhat likely Not very likely Not at all likely 2. Thinking of how you feel right now, if the upcoming FEDERAL election were held tomorrow, which of the following parties' candidates would you, yourself, be most likely to support? (SELECT ONE) [RANDOMIZE CODES 1-5] The Conservative Party The Liberal Party The New Democratic Party (NDP) [QUÉBEC ONLY] The Bloc Québécois (BQ) The Green Party [SHOW THIRD TO LAST]: Or some other party [SHOW SECOND TO LAST]: Would not vote/None/Would spoil ballot) [SHOW LAST] Don’t Know/Not sure [IF "DON'T KNOW/NOT SURE IN Q2, ASK Q3] 3. Well, which party would you say you are leaning towards? (SELECT ONE) [RANDOMIZE CODES 1-5] The Conservative Party The Liberals The New Democratic Party (NDP) [QUÉBEC ONLY] The Bloc Québécois (BQ) The Green Party [SHOW SECOND TO LAST]: Some other party [SHOW LAST] Don’t know/ Not sure 4. How certain are you that this is the party you will support on May 2nd, Election Day. Absolutely certain Fairly certain Not very certain Not at all certain 4A. Have you already voted for the upcoming federal election on May 2nd? 1 Yes No [IF YES, CONTINUE; IF NO, SKIP TO Q5] 4B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Political Observer Reporting and Analysing Canadian Political and Public Policy Developments
    The Canadian Political Observer Reporting and Analysing Canadian Political and Public Policy Developments September 2009 Volume 15, Issue 10 ISSN 1202-8967 Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff Faces Major Challenge to his Leadership Liberal party leader for less than a year since the December 2008 decision by the Liberal caucus and senior Liberal officials to install him in place of the politically floundering Stéphane Dion (or Liberal MP Bob Rae), Michael Ignatieff’s leadership is increasingly being called into question. Some Liberals are reportedly already contemplating the post-Ignatieff era for the party. Like former Leader Dion, it is generally assumed that Ignatieff, 62, will fight at least one election campaign. Some suggest he may get a second election given the state of the Liberal party following the last two federal elections. However, if Ignatieff’s leadership falters, this would be the third failed leader for the Liberals since the departure of Liberal Leader Jean Chrétien in late 2003, a boon to the Harper Conservatives and the other parties. Nor is there an obvious replacement for Ignatieff. One political pundit suggests that the Liberals desperately need a strong leader in place of Ignatieff, Bob Rae and former New Brunswick Premier and Canadian Ambassador to the US Frank McKenna, but cannot come up with any names. This suggests that the Liberals will have to look beyond some of the recent or suggested leadership contenders. Several recent polls tend to point to the same conclusion: that the Liberals are trailing the Conservatives by around six or seven points nationally, 36%-37% to 30%.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutionnel Constitutional
    Constitutional forumconstitutionnel Centre for Constitutional Studies Centre d’études constitutionnelles Volume 18, Number 1, 2009 Constitutional Forum constitutionnel Editor: Centre for Constitutional Studies Greg Clarke Management Board • Eric Adams • Mr. Justice Ronald Berger Production: • Peter Carver, Deputy Chair Amber Holder • L. Christine Enns • Judith A. Garber, Chair Student Editor: • Lois Harder Martha Peden • Donald Ipperciel • Janet Keeping • Ritu Kullar Subscriptions • Randall Morck Canadian Orders: • George Pavlich $46.20 CDN (includes 5% GST) per volume • Pat Paradis (3 issues) • Bronwyn Shoush US and other international orders: $44.00 USD per volume (3 issues) Staff For information about subscriptions and back • Greg Clarke, Executive Director issues, contact: • Vacant, Program Manager • Amber Holder, Administrator Amber Holder [email protected] (780) 492-5681 Centre for Constitutional Studies Constitutional Forum constitutionnel is 448D Law Centre published three times per year by the Centre University of Alberta for Constitutional Studies/Centre d’études Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5 constitutionnelles with the generous support Canada of the Alberta Law Foundation. (780) 492-5681 (phone) (780) 492-9959 (fax) [email protected] www.law.ualberta.ca/centres/ccs Constitutional Forum constitutionnel is in- dexed in: Index to Canadian Legal Periodical Literature, Index to Canadian Legal Litera- ture, and Current Law Index. ISBN: 978-0-9811751-1-9 Centre for Constitutional Studies PUBLICATION MAIL AGREEMENT #4006449667 Centre d’études constitutionnelles Submissions Constitutional Forum constitutionnel publishes works, in English or French, of interest to a broad readership. We welcome essays, original research, case comments, and revised versions of oral pre- sentations pertaining to constitutions and constitutionalism. Manuscripts addressing current issues and cases are particularly encouraged.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuity and Change in Canadian Conservative Campaign Rhetoric
    Front Matter TRUMPING CANADA? CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN CANADIAN CONSERVATIVE CAMPAIGN RHETORIC by Daryn Tyndale, BA (Hons), McGill University, 2019 A major research paper presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Professional Communication Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2020 © Daryn Tyndale, 2020 Author’s Declaration for Electronic Submission of a Major Research Paper I declare that I am the sole author of this Major Research Paper. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this MRP to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract The Conservative Party of Canada has been widely noted for its meticulous branding and tight message control. In contrast, US president Donald Trump, representing the traditionally conservative Republican Party, demonstrates a remarkable lack of message discipline: his infamous unscripted candor often descends into vulgarity. Yet, despite his lack of message discipline, Trump was successfully elected president, suggesting that his distinctive rhetorical style may have contributed to his electoral appeal. This major research paper explores whether Donald Trump’s surprising victory may have inspired Canadian Conservatives to alter their own rhetorical strategies in the hopes of achieving similar success. I conducted a qualitative rhetorical analysis on six campaign speeches delivered by Conservative Party leaders in Canada’s two most recent federal elections (Andrew Scheer in 2019 and Stephen Harper in 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Debate Summary - ENGLISH SPEAKERS for a Detailed Methodology and Contact Information, Please See Page 5
    Post-Debate Summary - ENGLISH SPEAKERS For a detailed methodology and contact information, please see page 5. Sample Size 2512 1. Overall, who in your view, IS WINNING this debate - is it Stephen Harper, Stephane Dion, Jack Layton, Gilles Duceppe or Elizabeth May? 31% Stephen Harper 15% Stephane Dion 25% Jack Layton 2% Gilles Duceppe 17% Elizabeth May 10% Don’t know 2. Who has offered the BEST IDEAS AND POLICIES in the debate -- is it Stephen Harper, Stephane Dion, Jack Layton, Gilles Duceppe or Elizabeth May? 31% Stephen Harper 21% Stephane Dion 22% Jack Layton 2% Gilles Duceppe 20% Elizabeth May 4% Don’t know 3. Who do you think SOUNDS AND ACTS the most like a Prime Minister? -- is it Stephen Harper, Stephane Dion, Jack Layton, Gilles Duceppe or Elizabeth May? 47% Stephen Harper 16% Stephane Dion 24% Jack Layton 3% Gilles Duceppe 7% Elizabeth May 3% Don’t know PRE/POST Debate TOPLINE – ENGLISH Page 1 of 5 4. Forgetting about their policies for a moment, who did you find to be the most LIKEABLE? That is, the person you’d most like to go out for a beer or coffee with -- was it Stephen Harper, Stephane Dion, Jack Layton, Gilles Duceppe or Elizabeth May? 25% Stephen Harper 10% Stephane Dion 31% Jack Layton 7% Gilles Duceppe 25% Elizabeth May 3% Don’t know 5. And which leader do you think is the MOST VISUALLY ATTRACTIVE -- is it Stephen Harper, Stephane Dion, Jack Layton, Gilles Duceppe or Elizabeth May? 28% Stephen Harper 13% Stephane Dion 33% Jack Layton 9% Gilles Duceppe 5% Elizabeth May 12% Don’t know 6.
    [Show full text]