DOCSLIB.ORG

Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2014, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2014, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines World Heritage 38 COM WHC-14/38.COM/8A Paris, 6 June 2014 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-eighth session Doha, Qatar 15 – 25 June 2014 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2014, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2014. The World Heritage Committee is requested to note that all nominations of properties to be examined by the 38th session of the Committee are included on the Tentative Lists of the respective States Parties. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission; • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since the last session of the World Heritage Committee; • Annex 3 presents a list of all properties submitted on Tentative Lists received from the States Parties, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 38 COM 8A, see Point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Committee requests each State Party to submit an inventory of the cultural and natural properties situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. The purpose of these inventories, also known as Tentative Lists, is to enable the World Heritage Committee to evaluate, within the widest possible context, the “Outstanding Universal Value” of each property nominated to the List. At its 24th session (Cairns, 2000), the Committee confirmed the importance of these Lists for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies. It also decided that inclusion on the Tentative List would be mandatory for all properties which the State Party intends to nominate for inscription on the World Heritage List. 2. According to paragraph 65 of the Operational Guidelines, States Parties shall submit Tentative Lists at least one year prior to the submission of any nomination. Annex 2A of the Operational Guidelines shall be used as the Tentative List submission format for national future nominations. Annex 2B of the Operational Guidelines shall be used for all transnational and transboundary future nominations and, the submission of such Tentative Lists will be valid only when all the States Parties involved have sent their submissions. 3. In considering the use of Tentative Lists as a means for achieving the objectives of the Global Strategy, the Special Expert Meeting on “The Concept of Outstanding Universal Value”, Kazan, Russian Federation, (April 2005), recommended that: • States Parties should each establish a coordination mechanism with an interdisciplinary composition to undertake and oversee effectively the implementation of the World Heritage Convention and the preparation and review of Tentative Lists in particular; • Tentative Lists should be seen as part of the effort of conservation of national heritage; • Properties on Tentative Lists should have national and/or other appropriate recognition; • Compilation of Tentative Lists should involve local communities and indigenous peoples and should include public consultation where appropriate; • The compilation of Tentative Lists should take account of the Global Strategy, comparative studies and the Advisory Bodies gap analysis; • The preparation of Tentative Lists should have due regard to other international conventions and programmes; • In preparation of their Tentative Lists, States Parties should be rigorous in their local evaluation to ensure that expectations of inscription match reality; • The size of a Tentative List should take into account the Cairns-Suzhou decision (Decision 28 COM 13.1) and the 10 years cycle of the Tentative List recommended by the Operational Guidelines (paragraph 65); • The comparative analysis should be developed by regions and themes; • Regional meetings on harmonization of Tentative Lists should identify types of properties for nomination in a given region, and those for possible inclusion as transnational and transboundary properties; • States Parties with no Tentative List should be encouraged to request preparatory International Assistance, if necessary, for preparing their Tentative List; • The Advisory Bodies, within their available resources, should comment on the Tentative Lists of all States Parties upon request. 4. The resource manual “Preparing World Heritage Nominations” (http://whc.unesco.org/ en/activities/643/) may also prove useful for the preparation of Tentative Lists. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2014 WHC-14/38.COM/8A, p. 1 5. As also noted in Document WHC-14/38.COM/9A in order for the Upstream Processes to be more effective, the upstream support should ideally intervene at an earlier stage of the nomination process, more precisely at the moment of revision of the States Parties Tentative Lists. Therefore, Upstream Processes related to Tentative Lists could be refined to provide States Parties with opportunities for further guidance and assistance. 6. It is also to be noted that the Tentative Lists registration process as it is currently outlined in the Operational Guidelines may need to be reviewed in order to allow for more efficient processing of submissions. Consequently, the Committee may wish, at its 39th session, to consider a possible revision of the relevant part of the Operational Guidelines, with a view of introducing a new procedure in this regard. 7. As of 15 April 2014, of the 190 States Parties which have ratified the Convention, 177 have submitted Tentative Lists in accordance with the requirements specified in the Operational Guidelines, and 13 States Parties have not submitted any Tentative List. All nominations submitted for examination in 2014 (see Document WHC-14/38.COM/8B) are included on the Tentative Lists of the States Parties concerned. 8. In conformity with Committee Decision 27 COM 8A, paragraph 4, this document presents the Tentative Lists submissions received since the last session of the World Heritage Committee in a separate annex. Since the 37th session of the Committee, 23 States Parties have submitted new Tentative Lists or have modified existing Lists, that meet all the requirements of paragraph 68 of the Operational Guidelines. The number of new properties added to existing Tentative Lists is 90. These properties are presented in Annex 2 of this document. 9. In conformity with Committee Decision 7 EXT.COM 4A, properties already inscribed on the World Heritage List were removed from the Tentative Lists of States Parties. 10. In conformity with the Committee Decision 27 COM 8A, paragraph 5, the complete Tentative Lists of all States Parties are accessible to the public at the following web address of the World Heritage Centre: http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists. 11. Moreover, the World Heritage Committee invites States Parties, which have not yet done so, to submit, as early as possible, Tentative Lists in accordance with the Operational Guidelines. Preparatory assistance can be provided if necessary and requested by the State Party concerned. II. DRAFT DECISION Draft Decision: 38 COM 8A The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-14/38.COM/8A, 2. Stressing the importance of the process of revision and updating of Tentative Lists, as a tool for regional harmonisation of the World Heritage List and of long term planning of its development; 3. Takes note of the Tentative Lists presented in Annexes 2 and 3 of this document; 4. Requests the World Heritage Centre to present a proposal for revising the procedure of registration of Tentative Lists in the Operational Guidelines, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 39th session, in 2015. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2014 WHC-14/38.COM/8A, p. 2 Content of the Annexes: Annex 1 Situation relative to Tentative Lists page 4 Annex 2 New Tentative Lists and additions to page 6 Tentative Lists submitted since 16 April 2013 Annex 3 World Heritage Tentative Lists by page 9 region: page 9 Africa page 11 Arab States page 13 Asia and the Pacific page 17 Europe and North America page 23 Latin America and the Caribbean Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2014 WHC-14/38.COM/8A, p. 3 Annex 1 SITUATION RELATIVE TO TENTATIVE LISTS Absence of a date indicates that the State Party has not yet submitted a Tentative List in conformity with the requirements of the Operational Guidelines. State Party Last State Party Last Revision Revision Egypt 03/11/2010 AFRICA Iraq 28/03/2014 Angola 03/06/2009 Jordan 11/05/2007 Benin 31/03/2009 Kuwait 27/02/2013 Botswana 27/10/2010 Lebanon 01/07/1996 Burkina Faso 24/01/2012 Libya Burundi 09/05/2007 Mauritania 14/06/2001 Cabo Verde 07/05/2004 Morocco 27/11/2013 Cameroon 18/04/2006 Oman 23/05/2013 Central African Republic 11/04/2006 Palestine 06/06/2013 Chad 21/07/2005 Qatar 18/03/2008 Comoros 31/01/2007 Saudi Arabia 17/09/2012 Congo 12/06/2008 Sudan 28/09/2004 Côte d'Ivoire 29/11/2006 Syrian Arab Republic 23/06/2011 Democratic Republic of the Congo 11/11/1997
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of Conservation Report by The
    au_(_~ b.-,rl.-,~ooaa~(Y)b J'tJ~6'tJ~'tJ~o aaaJao~~a(Y)<'>Ob ~..,e aob a~(Y)a6'tJ ~o b.-,.-,0a66(Y) Georgian National Agency for Cultural Heritage Preservation(,i-1/J. " ..:.'d)___ 0 u (ri _ ..;._ ---------- 201s v· To: Mr. Kishore Rao, Director World Heritage Centre 7, Place de Fontenoy 75352, Paris 07 SP Dear Mr. Rao, In conformity with the decisions of the 38th session of t he World Heritage Committee, held in Do ha, Qatar in 2014, I would like to present for your consideration the State of Conservation report of the Bagrati Cathedral an d Gelati Monastery World Heritage Site as well as the State of Conservation and Progress Re ports of the Historical Monuments of Mtskheta World Heritage Site. On behalf of the National Agency for Cultural Heritage Preservation of Georgia, I would like to reiterate the deep commitment to the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Please, accept the assurance of my highest consideration. Nikoloz Antidze Director General (;" ~__.:, Annex 1: SoC report Historical Mo uments of Mtskheta Annex 2: Progress Report Historic I Monuments of Mtksheta Annex 3: SoC report Bagrati cathedral and Gelati Monastery 0105. J.m?loS!!_'o ho. m.'>6'Z}t!•'> 030S!!,'O h d· No5, (~lJR'· ( +995 32) 93 24 11, 93 23 94 5 Tabukashvili str. Tbilisi 0105. Tel.(+995 32) 93 24 II, 93 23 94 Bagrati Cathedral and Gelati Monastery, C 710 The present folder contains: 1. State of Conservation Report of the Bagrati Cathedral and Gelati Monastery, C710, Georgia, 2015 Annexes orovided on CD: Annex 1: Metodology report about conservation of building stones of the Early 12th-Century Church of the Virgin at Gelati Monastery in Kutaisi - Stefano Volta Annex 2: Engineering Technical Report Annex 3: Technical Report of the Restoration Works 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines
    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses X Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods An international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity May 14-15, 2020 / Izmir, Turkey Edited by Ergün Laflı Izmir 2020 Last update: 04/05/2020. 1 Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods. Papers presented at the international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity, May 14-15, 2020 / Izmir, Turkey, Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea – Acta congressus communis omnium gentium Smyrnae. Copyright © 2020 Ergün Laflı (editor) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission from the editor. ISBN: 978-605-031-211-9. Page setting: Ergün Laflı (Izmir). Text corrections and revisions: Hugo Thoen (Deinze / Ghent). Papers, presented at the international video conference, entitled “Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods. An international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity” in May 14–15, 2020 in Izmir, Turkey. 36 papers with 61 pages and numerous colourful figures. All papers and key words are in English. 21 x 29,7 cm; paperback; 40 gr. quality paper. Frontispiece. A Roman stele with two portraits in the Museum of Kırşehir; accession nos. A.5.1.95a-b (photograph by E.
    [Show full text]
  • Dendrochronologically Dated Ottoman Monuments
    Dendrochronologically Dated Ottoman Monuments Peter Ian Kuniholm 4 Dendrochronologically Dated Ottoman Monuments Peter Ian Kuniholm INTRODUCTION Dendrochronology or tree-ring dating has been carried out by the author in former Ottoman lands since 1973. The method is, at its sim- plest, to compare the alternately small and large annual growth-rings from trees from a given climate region-in this case as far west as Bosnia and as far east as Erzurum-and to match them so that a unique year-by-year growth profile may be developed. By means of this a precise date determination, accurate even to the year in which the wood was cut, is possible. See Kuniholm (1995) for a fuller discussion of the method; and then see Kuniholm and Striker (1983; 1987) and Kuniholm (1996) for earlier date-lists of Ottoman, post-Byzantine, and Byzantine buildings, including brief notices of dates for a dozen more dated Ottoman buildings, principally in Greece, and additional notices of sampled but not yet dated buildings which are not repeated here. What follows is a compilation, in reverse chronological order, of over fifty dated buildings or sites (more if one counts their constituent parts) from the nineteenth century back to the twelfth (Figure 4.1). Some are major monuments (imperial mosques, sarays, sifayes) clearly deserving of more comprehensive treatment than can be pro- vided here; others (tiirbes, mescits, obscure medreses, and private houses) are little-known, perhaps even unheard of except to special- ists; but all help to form part of the tree-ring sequence which begins with the rings of trees still standing in Turkish forests and extends in an unbroken chain to A.D.360 for oak, A.D.743 for pine, and A.D.1037 for juniper.
    [Show full text]
  • One Week Tour in Georgia – Imereti and Racha
    One week tour in Georgia – Imereti and Racha – Offered by: Foundations from Poland: “Partnerstwo” and “Together for Rural Development” with ”International Center for Caucasus Tourism” (ICCT) from Georgia Autumn offer WHERE: Imereti – Racha (Georgia) WHEN: September-October HOW: Direct flights to Kutaisi from many European cities PRICE: € 500,0 + flight cost ON-SITE: insurance, accommodation, meals, guided tours and guaranteed unforgettable impressions GROUP: maximum 15 person I NVITE : P OLISH FUNDS "TOGETHER FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT ”&" P ARTNERSTVO "&"I NTERNATIONAL C ENTER FOR C AUCASUS T OURISM “ I C C T How to reach Kutaisi? • DIRECT flights to KUTAISI “Kopitnari” FROM: Barcelona, Berlin, Birmingham, Budapest, Dortmund, Katowice, Larnaca, Memmingen, Milan, Moscow, Paris, Prague, Riga, Thessaloniki, Vilnius, Warsaw, Wroclaw. Flights schedule with present time http://kutaisi.aero/Flights • Georgian Currency GEL (Lari) (USD: 2.57; EUR: 2.92). Withdrawing of GEL from ATM from your card or exchange USD /EUR into GEL at the relevant points. • Language – Georgian, possibility to communicate in English, Polish and Kutaisi Russian (mostly with aged people) ქუთაისი • Convenient dress - sports ware Kopitnari • Perceptible temperature – about +18 კოპიტნარი • Telephone code +995 NOTE: - Air ticket price changes daily. The above mentioned cost reflects the situation on 18th August 2018 - One can buy a group ticket (more than 9 people) Map of KUTAISI Google Map image highlights the most important tourist destinations in the city. The system "Street
    [Show full text]
  • Acceptance and Rejection of Foreign Influence in the Church Architecture of Eastern Georgia
    The Churches of Mtskheta: Acceptance and Rejection of Foreign Influence in the Church Architecture of Eastern Georgia Samantha Johnson Senior Art History Thesis December 14, 2017 The small town of Mtskheta, located near Tbilisi, the capital of the Republic of Georgia, is the seat of the Georgian Orthodox Church and is the heart of Christianity in the country. This town, one of the oldest in the nation, was once the capital and has been a key player throughout Georgia’s tumultuous history, witnessing not only the nation’s conversion to Christianity, but also the devastation of foreign invasions. It also contains three churches that are national symbols and represent the two major waves of church building in the seventh and eleventh centuries. Georgia is, above all, a Christian nation and religion is central to its national identity. This paper examines the interaction between incoming foreign cultures and deeply-rooted local traditions that have shaped art and architecture in Transcaucasia.1 Nestled among the Caucasus Mountains, between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, present-day Georgia contains fewer than four million people and has its own unique alphabet and language as well as a long, complex history. In fact, historians cannot agree on how Georgia got its English exonym, because in the native tongue, kartulad, the country is called Sakartvelo, or “land of the karvelians.”2 They know that the name “Sakartvelo” first appeared in texts around 800 AD as another name for the eastern kingdom of Kartli in Transcaucasia. It then evolved to signify the unified eastern and western kingdoms in 1008.3 Most scholars agree that the name “Georgia” did not stem from the nation’s patron saint, George, as is commonly thought, but actually comes 1 This research addresses the multitude of influences that have contributed to the development of Georgia’s ecclesiastical architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for the World Heritage Site Gelati Monastery
    MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE WORLD HERITAGE SITE GELATI MONASTERY 2017 Table of Contents LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS........................................................................................................................5 1. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................6 1.1. Aim of the Management Plan.................................................................................................6 1.2. Relation with other studies.....................................................................................................6 1.3. Scope and approach ...............................................................................................................7 General.............................................................................................................................................7 Management principles ...................................................................................................................8 Approach..........................................................................................................................................9 1.4. Objectives of the management plan ................................................................................... 10 Preparation of a spatial plan for the project area......................................................................... 10 Protection and conservation management .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • De-Secularizing National Space in Georgia Silvia Serrano
    De-secularizing national space in Georgia Silvia Serrano To cite this version: Silvia Serrano. De-secularizing national space in Georgia. Identity studies in the Caucasus and the Black Sea Region, 2010, 2, pp.5-20. hal-01533778 HAL Id: hal-01533778 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01533778 Submitted on 6 Jun 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Silvia Serrano De-secularizing national space in Georgia1 Construction of a new presidential palace on the model of the White House, erection of new buildings; conversion of the old city of Signaghi into a Disney Land style Potemkin village; replacement of city centre oriental "bazaars" by Western style shopping malls: Georgia is under construction. The direct involvement of the public authorities in the landscaped drawing constitutes a well anchored tradition. Sufficient to remind the statues of Lenin, propaganda posters, or the folkorisation of the city through the restoration of "Old Tbilisi" in late Soviet time to understand that issues at stakes in transforming the urban cityscape are not only economic (real estate speculation, etc..) but also highly political: it aims at erasing the traces of the Soviet past and at making visible the governmental program of modernization, including in its rationalist and hygienist dimension, and rapprochement with the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Bagrati Cathedral and Gelati Monastery
    Date received by the World Heritage Centre 29 January 2014 Bagrati Cathedral and Gelati Monastery Background The currently serial property of Bagrati Cathedral and (Republic of Georgia) Gelati Monastery was inscribed on the World Heritage No 710bis List in 1994 on the basis of criterion (iv). It was inscribed on the World Heritage List in Danger in 2010. At its 37th session (Phnom Penh, 2013), the World Official name as proposed by the State Party Heritage Committee, in decision 37 COM 7A.32: Gelati Monastery 4. Expresses its deep regret that despite previous Location decisions the re-building of Bagrati Cathedral has been Tkibuli district completed and considers that the Bagrati Cathedral has Republic of Georgia been altered to such an extent that its authenticity has been irreversibly compromised and that it no longer contributes to the justification for the criterion for which the property was Brief description inscribed; Gelati Monastery is currently one part of the serial property of Bagrati Cathedral and Gelati Monastery. This 5. Requests the State Party to submit, by 1 February 2014, major boundary modification is for the reduction of the a request for a major boundary modification for the property property to enclose only Gelati monastery and its to allow Gelati Monastery to justify the criterion on its own; monastic precinct. The State Party submitted a major boundary nomination On the lower southern slopes of the mountains of the on 31st January 2014 and this was assessed by Northern Caucasus, Gelati monastery belongs to the ICOMOS. At its 39th session (Bonn, 2015), the World 'golden age' of medieval Georgia, a period of political Heritage Committee, in decision 39 COM 8B.35, referred strength and economic growth between the reigns of the major boundary modification of Bagrati Cathedral King David IV 'the Builder' (1089-1125) and Queen and Gelati Monastery”, Georgia, back to the State Party Tamar (1184-1213).
    [Show full text]
  • Print the Whole Itinerary
    Roundtrips Itinerary Wonders Of Georgia During the tour you will traverse Georgia from the snowy, severe and inaccessible summits of the Caucasus to the subtropical Black Sea coast. This tour involves travelling through radically different regions of Georgia, starting from Tbilisi and departing from Batumi. CityTour of Tbilisi Hike up the impressiv Gergeti Trinity Church Visit Gelati Monaster - UNESCO World Heritage Site Enjoy free time in Batumi Day - 1 Tbilisi TBILISI ARRIVAL Welcome to Tbilisi. Upon your arrival, check-in to your hotel. The rest of the day is free at leisure. Overnight: Tbilisi www.roundtrips.global [email protected] Roundtrips Itinerary Day - 2 Tbilisi TBILISI: CITYTOUR (B, D) During the morning, discover the great city of Tbilisi. Your CityTour includes the Metekhi Church, a good example of cross-domed Georgian Orthodox churches. Resting upon the top of the hill, the church overlooks the oldest part of Tbilisi, offering wonderful views of famous Narikala fortress. The fortress was established in the 4th century as Shuris-tsikhe. Next, visit Abanotubani at the foot of Narikala fortress. This place is where king Vakhtang Gorgasali discovered warm springs and subsequently found a new capital ‘Tbilisi’. Last on your tour is the Anchiskhati Basilica – the oldest surviving Basilica in the city. The afternoon is free at leisure. We recommend a visit of the National Museum of Georgia or the Open Air Ethnographic Museum. In the evening, enjoy a welcome dinner. Overnight: Tbilisi Day - 3 Tbilisi TBILISI: ROUNDTRIP TO WINE REGION KAKHETI (B, L) Your first stop today is the Bodbe Nunnery, one of the major pilgrimage sites in Georgia and the place where St.
    [Show full text]
  • Veteriner Fakültesi
    ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ ANKARA UNIVERSITY www.ankara.edu.tr Baskı: Ankara Ünı̇versı̇tesı̇ Basımevi Adres: İncitaşı Sokak No: 10 06510 Beşevler/ANKARA Tel: 0 (312) 213 66 55 Basım Tarihi: Telif hakkı © 2021 Ankara Üniversitesi Bu kitapçıkla ilgili her türlü kullanım ve çoğaltma hakları ile diğer haklar Ankara Üniversitesi'ne aittir. Bu kitapçık Ankara Üniversitesi Basın Halkla İlişkiler Birimi tarafından hazırlanmıştır. Güneş Kursu The Sun Disc Ankara Üniversitesi’nin sembolü olan Güneş Kursu, genellikle Hitit The symbol of Ankara University is the Sun Disc. This symbol is uygarlığına ait bir eser olarak kabul edilir ve çoğumuzda Ankara commonly regarded as belonging to the Hittite civilization and usually ve Anadolu çağrışımlarını uyandırır. Bulunduktan sonra ilk kez Dil connotes Ankara and Anatolia. ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi tarafından sembol olarak benimsenen, After its discovery, it was first used as the symbol of the Faculty of Ankara Üniversitesi kurulunca da Üniversitenin sembolü olarak kabul Languages and History-Geography, and later was adopted as the edilen Güneş Kursu, Atatürk’ün emriyle 1935 yılında Alacahöyük’te symbol of Ankara University. The Sun Disc was unearthed during başlayan kazılarla açığa çıkartılmıştır, Hitit öncesi döneminin yani Hatti the excavations started in 1935 by direct order of Atatürk. In fact the döneminin bir eseri olduğu belirtilen Güneş Kursu, tunçtan yapılmış symbol belongs to the Hattis from the pre-Hittite period. The Sun olup günümüzden yaklaşık 4250 sene önce dini merasimlerde Disc is made of bronze, and was commonly used about 4250 years kullanılmıştır. ago in religious ceremonies. The circle which forms the perimeter of Güneş Kursu’nu oluşturan yuvarlak, dünyayı ya da güneşi temsil the disc represents either the earth or the sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikivoyage Georgia.Pdf
    WikiVoyage Georgia March 2016 Contents 1 Georgia (country) 1 1.1 Regions ................................................ 1 1.2 Cities ................................................. 1 1.3 Other destinations ........................................... 1 1.4 Understand .............................................. 2 1.4.1 People ............................................. 3 1.5 Get in ................................................. 3 1.5.1 Visas ............................................. 3 1.5.2 By plane ............................................ 4 1.5.3 By bus ............................................. 4 1.5.4 By minibus .......................................... 4 1.5.5 By car ............................................. 4 1.5.6 By train ............................................ 5 1.5.7 By boat ............................................ 5 1.6 Get around ............................................... 5 1.6.1 Taxi .............................................. 5 1.6.2 Minibus ............................................ 5 1.6.3 By train ............................................ 5 1.6.4 By bike ............................................ 5 1.6.5 City Bus ............................................ 5 1.6.6 Mountain Travel ....................................... 6 1.7 Talk .................................................. 6 1.8 See ................................................... 6 1.9 Do ................................................... 7 1.10 Buy .................................................. 7 1.10.1
    [Show full text]