DOCSLIB.ORG

What Hit Odessa? UT Researcher Computes the Origin of the Odessa Crater

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Hit Odessa? UT Researcher Computes the Origin of the Odessa Crater What Hit Odessa? UT Researcher Computes the Origin of the Odessa Crater Odessa, Texas, received its ironic name in 1881 from showed that early estimates of the size and trajectory Russian railroad laborers, who must have longed for of the Odessa meteor were wrong and that a much the temperate Black Sea resort in their hot, prairie larger object coming in at a nearly grazing angle had exile. The Texan Odessa lies in the Permian Basin, site made the crater. “Our work has both validated the of some of the country’s richest oilfields. About eight code we used and enabled us to reconstruct the actual miles southwest of the town (which is now, thanks to event,” Littlefield says, “and it is also an interesting oil, a metropolis of nearly 100,000), the barren pas- story about the progress of science.” tures boast the second-largest meteor crater in the United States. Old Data Await New Methods Chances are that your personal catalogue of meteor Drilling to investigate the crater and four surround- craters begins and ends with the largest meteor crater, ing smaller craters, begun in 1939 by geologist Glen the Great Crater near Winslow, Arizona, also called Evans, was completed in the 1940s by E. G. Sellards the Barringer Crater or the Canyon Diablo crater, of UT Austin’s Bureau of Economic Geology. A shaft which is three quarters of a mile across and 600 feet was sunk in the center, in hopes of finding a large deep. The site has been open to the public since the core remnant of the nickel-iron meteorite, but only 1920s, astronauts trained to walk on the Moon there, fragments were discovered, and the diggers reluctant- and its picture has become the canonical crater photo. ly concluded that the collision had caused it to dis- integrate. Core samples from the excavations helped The Odessa Crater is far smaller, only 160 m (175 delineate the stratigraphy of the impact area, and the yards) in diameter, and the original depth of 30 m data found their way to the Texas Memorial Museum (~100 feet) is now only 2 m owing to the gradual ac- on the UT Austin campus. An artist’s rendition of a cumulation of sediments since the meteor struck an cross section through the center of the crater (Fig. 1) estimated 25,000 years ago. With its rocky rim ris- was exhibited by the museum, but it was only in 2000 ing another 2 to 5 m above the plain, it is far from that Evans and Charles Mear published a detailed unimpressive--but still, few have heard of it. Until five paper on the geology--in a museum bulletin issued by years ago, the site was basically uncared-for. Baylor University. What hit Odessa? How big was the meteor and what Littlefield and Bauman used the original stratigraphic was the impact like? Answers have been a long time data, which were supplied by Dr. Ann Molineux, cu- in coming. The details are only now emerging, thanks rator of non-vertebrate paleontology at the Texas Me- to new computer simulations, performed at the Texas morial Museum. Molineux believes that Littlefield’s Advanced Computing Center (TACC), based on early subsequent calculations at TACC validate the fun- data from the site. “This crater is finally getting some damental museological idea. “The work David and respect,” says Dr. David L. Littlefield of the Institute Paul did is a wonderful example,” she said, “because for Computational Engineering and Sciences at The it shows how old data are never exhausted--data that University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin), who carried have been saved can be re-used in new contexts at out the calculations together with graduate student later dates, when more is known or better methods of Paul T. Bauman. analysis are developed.” The simulations of the impact, done on TACC’s As Littlefield points out, it was not only new methods 224-processor IBM Power4 cluster, called Longhorn, that were developed, but also a revolution in scientific Texas Advanced Computing Center | Feature Story For more info, contact: Faith Singer-Villalobos, Public Relations, [email protected], 512.232.5771 Page 1 of 3 thinking about the Earth’s encounters with meteors. meteor craters, but not around volcanoes. The idea Because other geologic processes tend to erase the evi- that a meteor had been responsible for ending the dence, meteor craters are not the obvious suspects in dominance of dinosaurs some 65 million years ago, the constitution of the Earth’s crust. Yet there was an as it gained acceptance, completed the transformation epoch when the Earth must have been bombarded by of our thinking. The Earth was not a protected corner meteors as often as--or more often than, as it presents of the Universe, but subject from time to time to the a larger cross section to meteors--the Moon. Tectonic most catastrophic events. processes have disposed of those craters, and since the current geological epoch began, the Earth has New Calculations in a New Context suffered only occasional hits. Most have gone into the oceans, which cover 6/7 of the Earth’s surface. Those Littlefield has been at UT Austin since 1996, using that hit in the tropics were quickly overgrown. computational methods for predicting the effects of high-velocity impacts in solid and fluid media. He has Very few meteor falls have occurred throughout computed at TACC for many years. “We deal with human history. When Yale professor Benjamin Silli- problems that have high strain rates, large deforma- man and a colleague authenticated a fall in Weston, tions, and strong shocks--mostly highly transient Connecticut, in 1807, President Thomas Jefferson--an events,” he explains. Much of his funding has come Enlightenment scientist himself--was extremely skep- from the Department of Defense, for investigations tical. “I would rather believe two Yankee professors of the effects of explosions or of the penetration of would lie,” he reportedly said, “than that stones have armor by projectiles. “Planetary impacts are a new fallen from the heavens.” Arguments among geolo- departure, but they are also of greater interest in the gists over whether crustal features were volcanic or context of the new ‘catastrophism’ of astronomy and meteoric in origin were often heated, and astronomers geology,” he says. seemed to have little interest in meteors once they had landed. By the 1950s, the world list of craters con- When he learned that detailed geological data were tained only about 20 sites. available for the Odessa crater, including measure- ments of the crater and rim and a stratigraphy of the Thanks to efforts made by some astronomers, how- layers of soil and rock that the meteor hit, Littlefield ever, the list was gradually lengthened. The pioneers saw an opportunity to test his computational codes included Robert Dietz in the United States and Car- and validate them in a new regime, with a broader lyle Beals in Canada, and a second generation led by range of input parameters. Robert Grieve in Canada and the late and very well known Eugene Shoemaker in the United States. By Littlefield and Bauman used CTH, which he describes 1989, then, meteoritics expert H. Jay Melosh of the as a code embodying “Eulerian finite-volume con- University of Arizona could look at a list of about 150 tinuum mechanics,” in which calculations are made known craters and write, “As recently as 1950 most on a mesh of points representing the physical domain. astronomers believed that the lunar craters were gi- CTH is widely used in the academic, government, and ant volcanoes and all but a few geologists derided industry communities for high-velocity impact analy- the idea that the earth’s surface had been scarred by sis. “What we needed for input was material models impact structures kilometers in diameter. geo- of the constitution of the meteor and of the surface it chemists are just now beginning to realize that nearly impacted,” Littlefield says, “plus some guesses about all of the material now residing in planets has been the size and speed of the meteor and the angle of processed through high-velocity impacts.” (Melosh, attack.” The output was a redistribution of the mate- 1989: Impact cratering: A geologic process, Oxford rial in the model, showing the crater and the material Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, p. v.) ejected from the site, with gaseous material removed. The plate tectonics revolution of the 1960s and the Littlefield and Bauman’s preliminary calculations trips to the Moon helped validate this view, Littlefield used impact conditions suggested by the geological notes, as did a new means of distinguishing between studies: an iron meteor 4 m in diameter coming in at volcanoes and impact craters: shocked quartz crys- an angle of 60 degrees from the vertical at a velocity tals are found in the ejecta and in the breccia under of 12 km/s. These could not produce a crater volume Texas Advanced Computing Center | Feature Story For more info, contact: Faith Singer-Villalobos, Public Relations, [email protected], 512.232.5771 Page 2 of 3 great enough, or one of the right dimensions, so larger than originally believed. “As we worry about further runs were made. “We used a lower bound of the near-Earth and Earth-crossing asteroid orbits,” he 12 km/s for the velocity and an upper bound of 26-27 says, “we need to know what effects to expect from km/s,” Littlefield says, “with the original meteor -di a hit the size of Odessa--which probably occurs with ameter of 4 m and a larger diameter of 6.87 m, coming much greater frequency than the dinosaur-killing in at a lower angle, 77 degrees from vertical.” impacts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fire History and Climate Change
    Synthesis of Knowledge: Fire History and Climate Change William T. Sommers Stanley G. Coloff Susan G. Conard JFSP Project 09‐2‐01‐09 Sommers, William T., Stanley G. Coloff and Susan G. Conard 2011: Fire History and Climate Change. Report Submitted to the Joint Fire Science Program for Project 09‐2‐01‐09. 215 pages + 6 Appendices Abstract This report synthesizes available fire history and climate change scientific knowledge to aid managers with fire decisions in the face of ongoing 21st Century climate change. Fire history and climate change (FHCC) have been ongoing for over 400 million years of Earth history, but increasing human influences during the Holocene epoch have changed both climate and fire regimes. We describe basic concepts of climate science and explain the causes of accelerating 21st Century climate change. Fire regimes and ecosystem classifications serve to unify ecological and climate factors influencing fire, and are useful for applying fire history and climate change information to specific ecosystems. Variable and changing patterns of climate‐fire interaction occur over different time and space scales that shape use of FHCC knowledge. Ecosystem differences in fire regimes, climate change and available fire history mean using an ecosystem specific view will be beneficial when applying FHCC knowledge. Authors William T. Sommers is a Research Professor at George Ma‐ son University in Fairfax, Virginia. He completed a B.S. de‐ gree in Meteorology from the City College of New York, a Acknowledgements S.M. degree in Meteorology from the Massachusetts Insti‐ We thank the Joint Fire Sciences Program for tute of Technology and a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Daguerreian Annual 1990-2015: a Complete Index of Subjects
    Daguerreian Annual 1990–2015: A Complete Index of Subjects & Daguerreotypes Illustrated Subject / Year:Page Version 75 Mark S. Johnson Editor of The Daguerreian Annual, 1997–2015 © 2018 Mark S. Johnson Mark Johnson’s contact: [email protected] This index is a work in progress, and I’m certain there are errors. Updated versions will be released so user feedback is encouraged. If you would like to suggest possible additions or corrections, send the text in the body of an email, formatted as “Subject / year:page” To Use A) Using Adobe Reader, this PDF can be quickly scrolled alphabetically by sliding the small box in the window’s vertical scroll bar. - or - B) PDF’s can also be word-searched, as shown in Figure 1. Many index citations contain keywords so trying a word search will often find other instances. Then, clicking these icons Figure 1 Type the word(s) to will take you to another in- be searched in this Adobe Reader Window stance of that word, either box. before or after. If you do not own the Daguerreian Annual this index refers you to, we may be able to help. Contact us at: [email protected] A Acuna, Patricia 2013: 281 1996: 183 Adams, Soloman; microscopic a’Beckett, Mr. Justice (judge) Adam, Hans Christian d’types 1995: 176 1995: 194 2002/2003: 287 [J. A. Whipple] Abbot, Charles G.; Sec. of Smithso- Adams & Co. Express Banking; 2015: 259 [ltr. in Boston Daily nian Institution deposit slip w/ d’type engraving Evening Transcript, 1/7/1847] 2015: 149–151 [letters re Fitz] 2014: 50–51 Adams, Zabdiel Boylston Abbott, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoscience and a Lunar Base
    " t N_iSA Conference Pubhcatmn 3070 " i J Geoscience and a Lunar Base A Comprehensive Plan for Lunar Explora, tion unclas HI/VI 02907_4 at ,unar | !' / | .... ._-.;} / [ | -- --_,,,_-_ |,, |, • • |,_nrrr|l , .l -- - -- - ....... = F _: .......... s_ dd]T_- ! JL --_ - - _ '- "_r: °-__.......... / _r NASA Conference Publication 3070 Geoscience and a Lunar Base A Comprehensive Plan for Lunar Exploration Edited by G. Jeffrey Taylor Institute of Meteoritics University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico Paul D. Spudis U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Astrogeology Flagstaff, Arizona Proceedings of a workshop sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., and held at the Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston, Texas August 25-26, 1988 IW_A National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Division 1990 PREFACE This report was produced at the request of Dr. Michael B. Duke, Director of the Solar System Exploration Division of the NASA Johnson Space Center. At a meeting of the Lunar and Planetary Sample Team (LAPST), Dr. Duke (at the time also Science Director of the Office of Exploration, NASA Headquarters) suggested that future lunar geoscience activities had not been planned systematically and that geoscience goals for the lunar base program were not articulated well. LAPST is a panel that advises NASA on lunar sample allocations and also serves as an advocate for lunar science within the planetary science community. LAPST took it upon itself to organize some formal geoscience planning for a lunar base by creating a document that outlines the types of missions and activities that are needed to understand the Moon and its geologic history.
    [Show full text]
  • Qiao Et Al., Sosigenes Pit Crater Age 1/51
    Qiao et al., Sosigenes pit crater age 1 2 The role of substrate characteristics in producing anomalously young crater 3 retention ages in volcanic deposits on the Moon: Morphology, topography, 4 sub-resolution roughness and mode of emplacement of the Sosigenes Lunar 5 Irregular Mare Patch (IMP) 6 7 Le QIAO1,2,*, James W. HEAD2, Long XIAO1, Lionel WILSON3, and Josef D. 8 DUFEK4 9 1Planetary Science Institute, School of Earth Sciences, China University of 10 Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China. 11 2Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, 12 Providence, RI 02912, USA. 13 3Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK. 14 4School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 15 Georgia 30332, USA. 16 *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] 17 18 19 20 Key words: Lunar/Moon, Sosigenes, irregular mare patches, mare volcanism, 21 magmatic foam, lava lake, dike emplacement 22 23 24 25 1/51 Qiao et al., Sosigenes pit crater age 26 Abstract: Lunar Irregular Mare Patches (IMPs) are comprised of dozens of small, 27 distinctive and enigmatic lunar mare features. Characterized by their irregular shapes, 28 well-preserved state of relief, apparent optical immaturity and few superposed impact 29 craters, IMPs are interpreted to have been formed or modified geologically very 30 recently (<~100 Ma; Braden et al. 2014). However, their apparent relatively recent 31 formation/modification dates and emplacement mechanisms are debated. We focus in 32 detail on one of the major IMPs, Sosigenes, located in western Mare Tranquillitatis, 33 and dated by Braden et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Surfaces
    Chapter 4 PLANETARY SURFACES 4.1 The Absence of Bedrock A striking and obvious observation is that at full Moon, the lunar surface is bright from limb to limb, with only limited darkening toward the edges. Since this effect is not consistent with the intensity of light reflected from a smooth sphere, pre-Apollo observers concluded that the upper surface was porous on a centimeter scale and had the properties of dust. The thickness of the dust layer was a critical question for landing on the surface. The general view was that a layer a few meters thick of rubble and dust from the meteorite bombardment covered the surface. Alternative views called for kilometer thicknesses of fine dust, filling the maria. The unmanned missions, notably Surveyor, resolved questions about the nature and bearing strength of the surface. However, a somewhat surprising feature of the lunar surface was the completeness of the mantle or blanket of debris. Bedrock exposures are extremely rare, the occurrence in the wall of Hadley Rille (Fig. 6.6) being the only one which was observed closely during the Apollo missions. Fragments of rock excavated during meteorite impact are, of course, common, and provided both samples and evidence of co,mpetent rock layers at shallow levels in the mare basins. Freshly exposed surface material (e.g., bright rays from craters such as Tycho) darken with time due mainly to the production of glass during micro- meteorite impacts. Since some magnetic anomalies correlate with unusually bright regions, the solar wind bombardment (which is strongly deflected by the magnetic anomalies) may also be responsible for darkening the surface [I].
    [Show full text]
  • DMAAC – February 1973
    LUNAR TOPOGRAPHIC ORTHOPHOTOMAP (LTO) AND LUNAR ORTHOPHOTMAP (LO) SERIES (Published by DMATC) Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Scale: 1:250,000 Projection: Transverse Mercator Sheet Size: 25.5”x 26.5” The Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Series are the first comprehensive and continuous mapping to be accomplished from Apollo Mission 15-17 mapping photographs. This series is also the first major effort to apply recent advances in orthophotography to lunar mapping. Presently developed maps of this series were designed to support initial lunar scientific investigations primarily employing results of Apollo Mission 15-17 data. Individual maps of this series cover 4 degrees of lunar latitude and 5 degrees of lunar longitude consisting of 1/16 of the area of a 1:1,000,000 scale Lunar Astronautical Chart (LAC) (Section 4.2.1). Their apha-numeric identification (example – LTO38B1) consists of the designator LTO for topographic orthophoto editions or LO for orthophoto editions followed by the LAC number in which they fall, followed by an A, B, C or D designator defining the pertinent LAC quadrant and a 1, 2, 3, or 4 designator defining the specific sub-quadrant actually covered. The following designation (250) identifies the sheets as being at 1:250,000 scale. The LTO editions display 100-meter contours, 50-meter supplemental contours and spot elevations in a red overprint to the base, which is lithographed in black and white. LO editions are identical except that all relief information is omitted and selenographic graticule is restricted to border ticks, presenting an umencumbered view of lunar features imaged by the photographic base.
    [Show full text]
  • George P. Merrill Collection, Circa 1800-1930 and Undated
    George P. Merrill Collection, circa 1800-1930 and undated Finding aid prepared by Smithsonian Institution Archives Smithsonian Institution Archives Washington, D.C. Contact us at [email protected] Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Historical Note.................................................................................................................. 1 Descriptive Entry.............................................................................................................. 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series 1: PHOTOGRAPHS, CORRESPONDENCE AND RELATED MATERIAL CONCERNING INDIVIDUAL GEOLOGISTS AND SCIENTISTS, CIRCA 1800-1920................................................................................................................. 4 Series 2: PHOTOGRAPHS OF GROUPS OF GEOLOGISTS, SCIENTISTS AND SMITHSONIAN STAFF, CIRCA 1860-1930........................................................... 30 Series 3: PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL SURVEY OF THE TERRITORIES (HAYDEN SURVEYS), CIRCA 1871-1877..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide to 1:250,000 Scale Lunar Maps
    CORE https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19750010068Metadata, citation 2020-03-22T22:26:24+00:00Z and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NASA Technical Reports Server USER GUIDE TO 1:250,000 SCALE LUNAR MAPS (NASA-CF-136753) USE? GJIDE TO l:i>,, :LC h75- lu1+3 SCALE LUNAR YAPS (Lumoalcs Feseclrch Ltu., Ottewa (Ontario) .) 24 p KC 53.25 CSCL ,33 'JIACA~S G3/31 11111 DANNY C, KINSLER Lunar Science Instltute 3303 NASA Road $1 Houston, TX 77058 Telephone: 7131488-5200 Cable Address: LUtiSI USER GUIDE TO 1: 250,000 SCALE LUNAR MAPS GENERAL In 1972 the NASA Lunar Programs Office initiated the Apollo Photographic Data Analysis Program. The principal point of this program was a detailed scientific analysis of the orbital and surface experiments data derived from Apollo missions 15, 16, and 17. One of the requirements of this program was the production of detailed photo base maps at a useable scale. NASA in conjunction with the Defense Mapping Agency (DMA) commenced a mapping program in early 1973 that would lead to the production of the necessary maps based on the need for certain areas. This paper is designed to present in outline form the neces- sary background informatiox or users to become familiar with the program. MAP FORMAT * The scale chosen for the project was 1:250,000 . The re- search being done required a scale that Principal Investigators (PI'S) using orbital photography could use, but would also serve PI'S doing surface photographic investigations. Each map sheet covers an area four degrees north/south by five degrees east/west.
    [Show full text]
  • Tossup Roentgen, Archimedes, Gauss, Balboa an D~¥As.:.? Da
    Tossup , Roentgen, Archimedes, Gauss, Balboa an_d ~¥as.:.? Da Gama all have one bigger than Einstein's. Rutherford's is inside of..G!avius'. ' ~e three largest are Hertzsprung, Korolev and Apollo. For 10 points );IlUlt are t!1e~ objects, seven of which will be named for the astronauts who ~e..s-p~ttle disaster. / . Lunar Craters (' ,/ J- This Athenjan wa~ an admirer of Socrates ~ndji . him' such works as the Symposium and the Apo!?gy of Socrates. ~ - - st known wever, as an historian, the author of the Hellemca and the AnaEiastS, an a t of a mercenary expedition into Asia Minor. For 10 points, name ntury B.C. author. Xenophon ,. .. .. "The seizure of $3~&;gWo Y Hills," "Savage Lu~y ... 'Teeth Like Baseballs, Eyes Like J llied ire, '" and "A Terrible Experience with Extremely Dangerous Drugs." These e apters from, for 10 points, .what book? Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (by Hunter S. Thompson) .' Lazlo Toth attacked her with a h~e, screaming "I Jesus Christ". He severed her left arm, smas~er nose-and lsfigured her I eye. That was in 1972, and today she and her ~n~i~ ·- behlnd i ss wall in J) Peter's Basilica the scars barely visible. For 10 y.Qin(s, "Yho are .... y, re ? ' The Pieul . L/ Accept: C~st and the Virgin Mary In 1649She invited Rene Descartes to her court to teach her philosophy. She had her lessons at 5 in the morning; Des.cartes, more used to rising at noon, caught a c . d died. Fo t's: who was this Swedish queen, \ the daughter of Gustavus Christina \, \ \ / Tossup Its biological name Ailuropod I 'l- " --~ .
    [Show full text]
  • Topographic Characterization of Lunar Complex Craters Jessica Kalynn,1 Catherine L
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 40, 38–42, doi:10.1029/2012GL053608, 2013 Topographic characterization of lunar complex craters Jessica Kalynn,1 Catherine L. Johnson,1,2 Gordon R. Osinski,3 and Olivier Barnouin4 Received 20 August 2012; revised 19 November 2012; accepted 26 November 2012; published 16 January 2013. [1] We use Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter topography data [Baldwin 1963, 1965; Pike, 1974, 1980, 1981]. These studies to revisit the depth (d)-diameter (D), and central peak height yielded three main results. First, depth increases with diam- B (hcp)-diameter relationships for fresh complex lunar craters. eter and is described by a power law relationship, d =AD , We assembled a data set of young craters with D ≥ 15 km where A and B are constants determined by a linear least and ensured the craters were unmodified and fresh using squares fit of log(d) versus log(D). Second, a change in the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Wide-Angle Camera images. d-D relationship is seen at diameters of ~15 km, roughly We used Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter gridded data to coincident with the morphological transition from simple to determine the rim-to-floor crater depths, as well as the height complex craters. Third, craters in the highlands are typically of the central peak above the crater floor. We established deeper than those formed in the mare at a given diameter. power-law d-D and hcp-D relationships for complex craters At larger spatial scales, Clementine [Williams and Zuber, on mare and highlands terrain. Our results indicate that 1998] and more recently, Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter craters on highland terrain are, on average, deeper and have (LOLA) [Baker et al., 2012] topography data indicate that higher central peaks than craters on mare terrain.
    [Show full text]