DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of a Framework for Circular Economy Within Furniture Manufacturing Companies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development of a Framework for Circular Economy Within Furniture Manufacturing Companies Master’s Degree Thesis Development of a Framework for Circular Economy within Furniture Manufacturing Companies Author: Mohamed Mustafa Supervisor: Ambrose Dodoo Semester: VT19 Course code: 5TS04E Table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 8 1.1 Background .............................................................................................. 13 1.2 Problem Definition ......................................................................................... 15 1.3 Aim & Objective ....................................................................................... 16 1.3.1 The Specific Objectives .......................................................................... 16 1.4 Importance of the study for the Furniture Industry ........................................ 16 1.5 Delimitation .................................................................................................... 17 2. LITERATURE REVIEW & THEORY ........................................................... 19 2.1 Literature ................................................................................................. 19 2.1.1 Necessity for adopting sustainable concepts ........................................... 19 2.1.2 Drive for integrating circular economy and sustainable framework ....... 20 2.1.3 Issue of implementing a circular framework ........................................... 21 2.1.4 Strength & weakness of circular economy .............................................. 22 2.2 Theory ............................................................................................................ 23 2.1 Sustainable Solutions ................................................................................. 23 2.2 Circular Economy ...................................................................................... 24 2.3 Product End-of-Life (EoL) ......................................................................... 26 2.4 Resource Efficiency ................................................................................... 30 3. METHODS & CASE COMPANIES ................................................................ 32 3.1 Research Methodology .................................................................................. 32 3.1.1 Comparative Design ................................................................................ 32 3.1.2 Ethical Consideration .............................................................................. 32 3.1.3 Literature Study ....................................................................................... 33 3.2 Data Gathering Methods ............................................................................... 33 3.2.1 Qualitative Research ............................................................................... 33 3.2.2 Semi-structured Interview ....................................................................... 34 3.2.3 Questionnaire .......................................................................................... 34 3.3 Case Companies ............................................................................................ 35 3.3.1 Interior Cluster Sweden ........................................................................... 35 3.3.2 Gemla Fabriker ........................................................................................ 36 3.3.3 Abstracta ................................................................................................. 37 4. RESULTS/ ANLAYSIS ..................................................................................... 39 4.1 Summary of Findings ..................................................................................... 51 5. DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................... 53 6. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 55 6.1 Approaches for circular economy targeted by the companies ....................... 55 6.2 Diverse opportunities gained from implementing circular economy ............. 55 6.3 framework for circular economy fitting for furniture manufacturing companies. ............................................................................................................ 56 7. FUTURE STUDY ............................................................................................... 63 8. REFRENCES ...................................................................................................... 64 Articles ................................................................................................................. 64 Books.................................................................................................................... 67 Certification ......................................................................................................... 68 Figures ................................................................................................................. 68 Interviews ............................................................................................................. 73 Websites ............................................................................................................... 73 Appendix ................................................................................................................. 86 Abstract The fast spreading industrialization revolution around the world has resulted in a rapid cycle of production and consumption of resources. Resulting in sustainable solutions being a fundamental need and resolutions which include efficient resources use. The concept of Circular Economy includes specific practices which take into consideration reusing resources through sustainable solutions resulting in the minimization of waste as well as the use of resources more efficiently. This study shows that organization approach circular economy in different ways, resulting in various definitions. Furthermore, the study emphasizes on the importance of developing a framework for circular economy when seeking to implement the concept. This research aims to develop a framework for the implementation of circular economy in consideration to furniture manufacturing companies. Furthermore, this research focuses on four theories: circular economy, sustainable solution, resource efficiency, and product End-of-Life (product EoL). A mixed method approach consisting of a semi-structured interview and a survey were used to help reach the aim of this study. The results from the interview two furniture manufacturing companies show that the companies use different aspects of the circular economy. In conclusion, companies with goals of being more sustainable should start considering circular economy principles from an early stage. This includes having a strict rule of only approving environmentally friendly materials. This also leads to the benefit that the practices of refurbishing and reusing allows for products to live for numerous lifetimes. 4 (87) Keywords • Circular economy: A concept used to target sustainability. The concept includes several principles and practices, including the usage of resources more efficient & reusing products and materials (Ellen Macarthur Foundation, 2017). • Sustainable development: Change of misusing resources and practice of identifying the human needs and ambitions (UN World Commission On Environment and Development, 1987). • Sustainable solutions: developing innovative solutions which impact the environment beneficially (UN World Commission On Environment and Development, 1987). • Re-use: A practice which include reusing a given product (Vezzoli & Manzini, 2008). • Re-furbish: A practice of making a product look new (King et al., 2006). • Environmental friendly: Avoiding any harmful impacts on the environment (Avdan, 2016). • Resource efficiency: The use of earth resources in a practice which is considered sustainable (European Commission, 2017). • Product end-of-life is a definition regarding a given product when it reaches the end use (King et al., 2006). 5 (87) Figures Figure 1: 12th Goal a cross-cutting issue towards other goals (European Union, 2019) ................................................................................................. 11 Figure 2: Guiding principle of Circular Economy ........................................ 14 Figure 3: The steps within Sustainable Solutions in this study ..................... 23 Figure 4: Towards Circular Economy (Ellen MacArthur Foundation) ......... 25 Figure 5: The practices of refurbishment and reuse (Shanghai HuaiTu Network Technology, 2019) ......................................................................... 28 Figure 6: Procuess of Product EoL ............................................................... 29 Figure 7: Difference between a standard business model and one that includen reusing and refurbishing ................................................................. 30 Figure 8: Issue reported by the European Commission ................................ 31 Figure 9: Chair manufactured by Gemla Fabrikers (Gemla, u.d.) ................ 36 Figure 10: Soundcapes manufactured by Abstracta (Abstracta AB, 2019) .. 38 Figure 11: SCALA WALL (Abstracta AB, 2019) ........................................ 38 Figure 12: CLARA Headboard manufactured by Gemla Fabrikers (gemla, 2014 ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Markets and the Economics of Natural Resources Syllabus
    Prof. Dr. Rudi Kurz Office hours: Wednesday 13:45-15:15 Office: W4.1.02 E-mail: [email protected] Markets and the Economics of Natural Resources BREM3001 Syllabus Winter Semester 2016/17 Time (room) Tuesday 15:30-17:00 (W1.5.06) Wednesday 15:30-17:00 (W2.3.15) Begin October 4 ECTS-Credits 5 Workload 150 hours: 60 h contact + 90 h reading/exercises/research Level Advanced Prerequisites Semester 1 and 2 completed (not more than 10 credits missing) Accessibility Obligatory for REM (semester 6) and open to international exchange students (ISP) Exam Written test (90 minutes) Objectives Students acquire advanced knowledge, understand and are able to apply instruments. They • understand the role of non-renewable natural resources in the context of sustainable development • are familiar with the economic aspects of resource scarcity and with solutions offered by resource economics • know important resource markets (including recycling and energy markets) and their performance • are able to analyze world resource market and to evaluate trends and fluctuations 2 Contents • Sustainable Development: general concept, rules for non-renewable resources • Market failure (public goods, tragedy of the commons, externalities) • Intertemporal allocation: Hotelling Rule, Hartwick Rule • Economic policy instruments (Pigou tax, tradable permits, Coase Theorem) • Natural resources and (limits to) economic growth, Jevons and Rebound • Accounting problems – beyond GDP • Eco-Efficiency and innovation policy • Energy markets and specifica of the energy sector • World market for natural resources: determinants, trend and volatility of prices • International commodity trading: Physical and derivative markets • Companies’ role and strategies in managing resource scarcity Basic Literature Baker, Robert (2010): The Trade Lifecycle: Behind the Scenes of the Trading Process, Chicester (Wiley) umw5 2013 330 Clark, Ephraim / Lesourd, Jean-Baptiste / Thieblemont, Rene (2001): International Com- modity Trading: Physical and Derivative Markets, Chichester (Wiley) umw5 2013 398 Conrad, Jon M.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairs' Summary: WRF Asia-Pacific 2015
    Chairs’ Summary: WRF Asia‐Pacific 2015 1. The inaugural World Resources Forum Asia‐Pacific attracted 300 participants from government, industry, research and non‐government organisations from Australia and the Asia‐Pacific including China, India, Japan, South Korea as well as participants from Europe and North America. 2. The forum was hosted by the Institute for Sustainable Futures (ISF) at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) and the Centre for Sustainable Materials Research and Technology (SMaRT@UNSW) at UNSW Australia, together with the World Resources Forum. 3. The key themes of the conference were Resource Productivity in the Asia‐Pacific, Enabling Transition Pathways and Innovation through Collaboration. Action in these themes requires Knowing, Wanting and Being Able. RESOURCE PRODUCTIVITY 4. More from less – sustaining growth with less input from resources is one of the megatrends of this century. “In the 21st century, one of the ‐ if not the ‐ most important challenges we have to solve is how we can bring prosperity to an ever‐growing population of our planet and do that in a sustainable way.” – Dr Alex Wonhas (WRF Asia‐Pacific Keynote) Executive Director Energy and Resources, CSIRO 5. Humanity needs to understand and shape future resource use to make sure there are enough resources available for future generations. Unless we address equity in distribution of resources material resource use will butt up against social impacts and how we use our resources will become a political issue for civil society. 6. There is little effective governance at a global level to secure long‐term security of important resources. When key global resources have a price spike, this shows the vulnerability of our systems and economies and our dependence on key resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman's Summary 1. Over 1,000
    Chairman’s Summary 1. Over 1,000 participants coming from 40 countries and international organisations attended and actively contributed to World Resources Forum 2014 in Arequipa, Peru, on 20-22 October 2014. 2. Participants, representing governments, businesses, thinktanks, scientific communities and civil societies, as well as students and young researchers, exchanged their views on strategies to increase resource productivity, to fight climate change, to decrease the environmental and social burden of current consumption and production patterns, and to achieve a high quality of life for the current and future generations. 3. Strongly committed representatives of stakeholders from many countries, in particular from Peru, highlighted the need to address the impact of climate change on agriculture and food security, as well as other crucial issues of our society. This should be done through technical and financial assistance and through engagement of key stakeholders. 4. New concepts of wealth and prosperity are emerging. The precautionary principle is a key concept when defining a safe operating space for socioeconomic activities in all three dimensions of sustainability. The role of governments in mitigation and adaptation actions was emphasised, as was the need for solid research in order to enable evidence-based policymaking. 5. Participants formulated global, national, regional and local policy recommendations (“resource wisdom” for cities) and proposed strategies for further action and research. International policies 6. Political and individual power need to be mobilised to push a wedge between economic growth, resource use and environmental and social impacts (decoupling). Priority measures include amendments in legislation, adjustment of financial instruments, promotion of investments in technological and social progress, transparency and accessibility of information, and encouragement of solidarity.
    [Show full text]
  • World Resources Forum 2017 Key Messages DR
    World Resources Forum 2017 Key Messages DR. MATHIAS SCHLUEP, PROGRAM DIRECTOR WORLD RESOURCES FORUM 1 Key Messages I 1. Accelerating the Resource Revolution is a multi-stakeholder challenge. Cooperating for resource-efficiency and decoupling is key. Science is essential for understanding the challenges in a systemic way, and communicating the solutions to society. 2. Sustainable Developments Goals and Paris Climate Agenda are calls for action. Rather than physical resource scarcity, climate change and poverty are the main challenges. Stop using and investing in coal, oil and gas. Make sure that resource productivity can help achieve the goals. Carbon-free products and housing need to be promoted. Better resource management can also bring about biodiversity conservation 3. Appropriate governance and leadership are essential to sustainable development. Waiting for economic development before protecting the environment is flawed thinking. We must grow without waste. To be considered: a UN convention on raw material resource efficiency, or other global agreements and rules. WORLD RESOURCES FORUM 2 Key Messages II 4. Transition to a circular economy is an important business opportunity. Metals and cement industries are, among other sectors, well placed for playing a role. Social dimension needs to be taken into account. An overarching policy framework on circular economy is needed to create a level playing field and allow internalization of costs. Secondary raw materials need to be cheaper than primary raw materials. 5. Sustainable Public Procurement (SPP) and product sustainability information can have a big impact and help scale up the circular economy. 6. Circular economy principles and rethinking and redesigning global plastic flows will reduce impacts on our oceans and health.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2014 Page 1 of 25
    ISIE Member Newsletter Fall 2014 Page 1 of 25 ISIE Fall 2014 View this email in your browser Dear ISIE Members: OUTREACH. This happens in many ways at many levels but some highlights are included. My term as President expires on December 31, 2014 and our new z Effort and involvement by ISIE members with President, Professor Chris Kennedy of important international audiences including the the University of Toronto, will step up World Economic Forum, World Resources Forum, to this role for 2015 and 2016. I participation by many members on the wanted to offer a short report to include Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and key areas enunciated in our strategic UN Resource Panel to name a few. goals and to offer my many thanks to you the membership z Listing of the 132 ten year members in the ISIE as well as the people that I have worked with most closely. 2013 conference brochure EVENTS. Institutionally, a lot of what ISIE is most involved z Record number of notices on the ISIE jobs board with are major events. for academic and professional positions z Final draft of a comprehensive brochure, overseen by Chris Kennedy with input from Council members Anthony Chiu and Julia Steinberger, directed at Deans of Engineering Schools for improving integration of industrial ecology. z A new prize offered by the Journal of Industrial Ecology for best articles by a senior author and a junior author. z A redesigned ISIE newsletter edited by Prof. Vered Blass with help from student Amit Meidata and always looking for more contributors.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Efficiency By
    UNCTAD Multi-Year Expert Meeting on Commodities and Development 2013 Recent developments and new challenges in commodity markets, and policy options for commodity-based inclusive growth and sustainable development Room XXVI Palais des Nations Geneva, Switzerland Global Policy Options for Promoting Resource Efficiency by Bas de Leeuw Managing Director, World Resources Forum (WRF) 21 MARCH 2013 This material has been reproduced in the language and form as it was provided. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNCTAD. UNCTAD Multi-Year Expert Meeting on Commodities and Development Geneva, 20-21 March 2013 Global Policy Options for Promoting Resource Efficiency Bas de Leeuw Managing Director World Resources Forum www.worldresourcesforum.org [email protected] World population 1400-2050 5231 3672 727 691 547 2050 1403 9.2 448 1950 2000 2050 314 Europe 172 1998 1950 2000 2050 North America 794 1950 2000 2050 6.1 2000 729 Asia 227 5 1987 519 1950 2000 2050 31 51 167 13 Africa 4 1974 1950 2000 2050 1950 2000 2050 South America Southeast Asia 3 1960 2 1927 1 1804 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 Source: Population Reference Bureau, World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision. Highlights. New York: United Nations. Global resource use 1980-2020 90 80 +200% MetalMetal ores ores 5.8 s 70 tonne 60 billion Fossil energy +81% Energycarriers carriers 10.6 50 Metal ores 40 30 b +68% BiomassBiomass 15. Energy carriers 20 10 Non -metallic +114% Otherminerals
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Circular Economy
    EKA University of Applied Science Tatjana Tambovceva, Jelena Titko INTRODUCTION TO CIRCULAR ECONOMY EKA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCE Tatjana Tambovceva, Jelena Titko INTRODUCTION TO CIRCULAR ECONOMY Publisher: Ekonomikas un kulturas augstskola Reviewers: Dzintra Atstāja, Petra Škerl ISBN 978-9984-24-231-6 / e-ISBN 978-9984-24-230-9 UDK 33(07) The book is developed within the project ''Online Master Programme for Circular Economy'' [CIRCECO]. CIRCECO is financed and supported by the European Commission, Erasmus + Programme, Key Action 2 – Strategic Partnership (grant agreement No. 2017-1-MK01-KA203-035392). 2 3 PREFACE This book is developed within the framework of the International project „Online Master Programme for Circular Economy (CIRCECO)”. Project coordinator – European University – Skopje (R. of Macedonia), project partners – Zelena Infrastruktura, Green Infrastructure Ltd. (Croatia), Fakulteta za komercialne in poslovne vede (Slovenia) YES Foundation (Macedonia) and The University of Economics and Culture (Latvia). Project period – December 2017 – January 2020. CIRCECO is financed and supported by the European Commission, Erasmus + Programme, Key Action 2 – Strategic Partnership (grant agreement No. 2017-1- MK01-KA203-035392). CIRCECO project’s specific goals are as follows: Circular Economy joint research – conducted in collaboration with participants from the business sector, researchers, experts, professionals and students in order to analyse economic indicators and potential benefits and risks of transitioning from linear
    [Show full text]
  • Digital with Purpose: Delivering a Smarter2030
    Digital with SUMMARY Purpose: Delivering a GESISMARTer2030 GESI Contents Foreword 4 Key Messages 6 Executive Summary 10 GESICase Studies 22 AT&T 24 Deutsche Telekom 28 EIT Climate-KIC 32 T-Mobile 36 Verizon 40 This document is an excerpt from the full report, for more information visit: digitalwithpurpose.gesi.org 2 About the authors Digital with Purpose: Delivering a SMARTer2030 About the authors About GeSI About Deloitte The Global Enabling Sustainability Initiative (GeSI) is a strategic Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu partnership of the Information and Communication Technology Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their (ICT) sector and organisations committed to creating and promoting related entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and technologies and practices that foster economic, environmental and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent social sustainability. Formed in 2001, GeSI’s vision is a sustainable world entities. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please through responsible, ICT-enabled transformation. GeSI fosters global see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more. and open cooperation, informs the public of its members’ voluntary actions to improve their sustainability performance, and promotes Deloitte is a leading global provider of audit and assurance, technologies that foster sustainable development. consulting, financial advisory, risk advisory, tax and related services. Our network of member firms in more than 150 countries
    [Show full text]
  • Panelists Bios UNEA3-Rev2 FINAL 28Nov2017
    PANELISTS Towards a Pollution-Free Planet: Accelerating the Sound Management of Chemicals and Waste #BeatPollution #Detox Ms. Ligia Noronha was appointed Director of UN Environment's Economy Division in April 2014. Before joining UN Environment, Ms. Noronha was Executive Director at TERI and Director of the Resources, Regulation and Global Security Division. She was Secretary, Asian Energy Institute (2005‐2011); Coordinator, Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnerships (REEEP) South Asia, (2005‐ 2009); and Michael Hintze Energy Security Visiting Senior Fellow at the Centre for International Security Studies (CISS), University of Sydney, Australia, 2009‐11. In 2004‐2005, she was Team Leader, Ecosystem approaches to Human Health, at Ligia Noronha the International Development Research Director, Economy Division Centre of Canada. She has served on the UN Environment National Security Advisory Board of the Government of India, and on several expert committees and panels of the Government of India and the Government of Goa. Rolph Payet is the Executive Secretary of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions. Formerly a Minister for Environment and Energy in the Seychelles, Pro‐Chancellor of the University of Seychelles and Associate Professor at the Linnaeus University in Sweden. He has been a lead Author of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, intheUNGroupofExpertsontheRegular Process and Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum. He is also a member/trustee of the Global Island Partnership, the Sea Level Rise Foundation, the Seychelles University Foundation, the Seychelles Centre for Marine Research and Technology, the Island ConservationSocietyandtheSilhouette Foundation. Rolph Payet Among his many specialties are small island Executive Secretary states, marine policy and coastal management Secretariat of the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm and adaptation, and his research interests lies Conventions within earth system dynamics, climate change and island systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Remarks by Bas De Leeuw, Managing Director of the World Resources Forum
    [Un-edited Version, Check Against Delivery] Opening Remarks by Bas de Leeuw, Managing Director of the World Resources Forum UNECE Symposium on the Availability of Raw Materials from Secondary Sources Geneva, 24 April 2018 Mr/Mrs Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen, Dear Friends and Colleagues, 1. It gives me great pleasure to welcome you here in Geneva at the UNECE Resource Management Week, to the Symposium on the Availability of Raw Materials from Secondary Sources, and to this afternoon’s Special Workshop on Waste Valorization and Critical Raw Materials. I want to thank you all for participating in this event, and I want to thank the organisers for bringing us all here. 2. As you know this event is a follow up to the Workshop on Strategic Raw Materials and Sustainable Development, that was part of the World Resources Forum, held in October last year, organized by our colleagues of ESM, the Entwicklungsfonds Seltene Metalle, the United Nations Economic Committee for Europe and the EIT Raw Materials. 3. In fact, the last time we were here in Geneva with our World Resources Forum was today exactly half a year ago. It was on October 24, and that date also happens to be international UN Day. That was maybe not a coincidence. Being here in Geneva – the Swiss UN Capital - has this great benefit of having all our partners of the extended UN family at walking distance. 4. Today we are in the middle of the UNECE Resource Management Week. We hope to bring our important task – which is developing a global agenda on strategies for the availability of secondary raw materials - some important steps further.
    [Show full text]
  • SDSN NETWORKS in ACTION 2020 Introduction to the SDSN’S ­Networks Program
    SDSN NETWORKS IN ACTION 2020 Introduction to the SDSN’s Networks Program n 2015, 193 countries adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity, for people and Ithe planet. The transformation that is needed to make this vision a reality is enormous in scale and complex. Universities are well-positioned to support this transition. They develop new technologies, business models, and governance frameworks; train future leaders to be global- ly-conscious and innovative; and have a proven track record working with diverse stakeholders, including governments, the private sector, civil society, and international organizations. The Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) mobilizes the SDSN President Jeffrey Sachs speaking at the COP25 Low-Emissions Solutions Conference world’s academic and research institutes and leverages their strengths Photo: © Julio César González to help realize the SDGs and the Paris Agreement. It has operated under the auspices of the UN Secretary-General since 2012. The SDSN pursues its mission by working with over 1,300 member institutions in 130 coun- tries, organized into 38 networks at the national and regional level. This expertise is channeled into multi-stakeholder events, pilot projects and The 2020 Networks in Action SDG implementation in the field, and reports, including the Sustainable Report is an inspiring and Development Report and the World Happiness Report, which have been illuminating account of the downloaded millions of times. leadership by universities around the world to develop In their respective countries and regions, SDSN’s networks of universi- and promote transformative ties, research centers, and other knowledge institutions focus on: solutions for the SDGs.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Towards the Resource Revolution
    PROGRESS TOWARDS THE RESOURCE REVOLUTION Christian Ludwig and Sonia Valdivia (Eds.) 2019 PROGRESS TOWARDS THE RESOURCE REVOLUTION Christian Ludwig Sonia Valdivia A World Resources Forum Production Printed by Paul Scherrer Institute Villigen PSI – March 2019 PROGRESS TOWARDS THE RESOURCE REVOLUTION Printed by Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) Editors Prof. Dr. Christian Ludwig, PSI and Ecole Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne (EPFL) Prof. Dr. Sonia Valdivia, World Resources Forum (WRF) Program Manager Scientific Advisor Dr. Cecilia Matasci, World Resources Forum (WRF) Scientific Officer Editorial Management Jordan Prieto, EPFL Citation Ludwig, Chr., Valdivia, S., Progress towards the Resource Revolution, World Resources Forum, Villigen PSI and St. Gallen, Switzerland, 2019 Available from Paul Scherrer Institute ENE-LBK-CPM 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland Phone +41 56 310 21 11 www.psi.ch ISBN 978-3-9521409-8-7 Foreword Since their first edition in 2009 World Resources Forum (WRF) conferences have served as a global platform for scientific exchange and helped to advancing international agendas by building on sound science contributions from the participants published in WRF conferences scientific reports. During the WRF 2017 conference, about 150 scientific presentations were part of the program which generated interesting and lively discussions. Highest-quality contributions went through an international peer review process supported by the WRF Scientific Committee which concluded with the selection of 26 papers. An exclusive subchapter on sustainable resources management containing six contributions from the private sector complements this book. Based on the key outputs of the WRF 2017 conference and the work performed during and after the review process in 2018 we are proud to announce this book entitled ‘Progress Towards the Resource Revolution’ which presents innovations and approaches that support solutions required by the Paris Agreement on Climate Change as well as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
    [Show full text]