A Formal Analysis of the Prehistoric Ceramics from Draper Park (20-SC-40): a Wayne Tradition Occupation on the St
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1980 A Formal Analysis of the Prehistoric Ceramics from Draper Park (20-SC-40): A Wayne Tradition Occupation on the St. Clair River in Southeastern Michigan Robert David Hoxie Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Hoxie, Robert David, "A Formal Analysis of the Prehistoric Ceramics from Draper Park (20-SC-40): A Wayne Tradition Occupation on the St. Clair River in Southeastern Michigan" (1980). Master's Theses. 1904. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1904 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A FORMAL ANALYSIS OF THE PREHISTORIC CERAMICS FROM DRAPER PARK (20-SC-40): A WAYNE TRADITION OCCUPATION ON THE ST. CLAIR RIVER IN SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN by Robert David Hoxie A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1980 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to the following people for assisting in various aspects of this study. For c ritic a l review of the original draft I acknowledge the valuable comments offered by Dr. William Cremin, Dr. Elizabeth Garland, and Dr. Nedenia Kennedy. For taking the time and interest to view the Draper Park pottery and to offer their professional opinions I would like to thank Dr. Janet Brashler, Dr. Margaret Holman, Dr. William Lovis, Dr. David Stothers, Mr. Ian Kenyon, Mr. William Fox, Mr. James Krakker, and Dr. James Fitting, who also correnented on an e a rlie r version of a similar paper presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Central States Anthropological Society in Milwaukee. I would also like to thank Mr. Donald Weston for arranging with the Museum of Arts and History in Port Huron for the loan of the collection and for assist ing Mr. Stephen Treichler of Commonwealth Associates in the con struction of the excellent Draper Park site maps and figures. Mr. Brian Mitchell of Western Michigan University's Computer Center offered considerable advice in the computerization of the attribute data for which I am very appreciative. Finally, I acknowledge the necessary financial assistance awarded me by The Graduate College of Western Michigan University during the early stages of the analysis. I greatly appreciate the aid of the aforementioned individuals and institutions and I apologize for any inadvertent ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. omissions that may have occurred. I alone, however, am solely responsible for the contents of, and any conclusions that may be drawn from, this thesis. Robert David Hoxie i i i Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete: copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy. Requests can be made to our Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases we have filmed the best available copy. University Micrdffilms International 300 N. ZEEB ROAD, ANN ARBOR, Ml 48106 18 BEDFORD ROW, LONDON WC1R 4EJ. ENGLAND Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1315381 HOXIE» ROBERT DAVID A FORMAL ANALYSIS OF THE PREHISTORIC CERAMICS FROM DRAPER PARK (2 0 -5 C -*0 )S A WAYNE TRADITION OCCUPATION ON THE ST. CLAIR RIVER IN SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN* WESTERN MICHIGAN: UNIVERSITY. M .A .. 1980 CQPR. 1980 HOXIE. ROBERT DAVID University Microfilms International 300 n z e e b r o a d , a n n a r b o r , mi 48106 (3) Copywright by Robert David Hoxie 1980 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark . 1. Glossy photographs ________ 2. Colored illustrations ________ 3. Photographs with dark background ^ ‘4. Illustrations are poor copy ________ 5. ° r in t shows through as there 1s text on both sides of page _________ 6. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages _________ 7. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine ________ 8. Computer printout pages with indistinct print ________ 9. Page(s) _____ lacking when material received, and not available from school or author 10. Page(s) ________seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows 11. Poor carbon copy ________ 12. Not original copy, several pages with blurred type ____ 13. Appendix pages are poor copy ________ 14. Original copy with light type ________ 15. Curling and wrinkled pages ________ 16. O th e r_______________________________ _ _ _ _ _ University M ic rd n im s International 300 N Z5== ao.. ANN AR30B Ml J8106 ‘3131 761-4700 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................... ii LIST OF MAPS.......................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES...................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES.................................................................................... v iii LIST OF PLATES...................................................................................... ix Chapter I INTRODUCTION.......................................................................... 1 Theoretical Orientation .................................................... 4 Site Description .................................................................. 9 I I ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT DRAPER PARK 12 I I I METHODOLOGY............................................................................ 23 IV GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ASSEMBLAGE.......................... 28 V ATTRIBUTE ANALYSIS............................................................... 34 Attribute List..................................................................... 36 VI TYPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS........................................................... 42 Middle Woodland Vessels.................................................... 42 Lake Forest........................................................................... 43 Late Woodland Vessels........................................................ 50 Wayne Tradition ................................................................ 50 Western Basin Tradition (Younge Sequence) .................. 76 Juntunen Sequence............................................................ 80 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE (F CONTENTS (cont'd) Chapter Blackduck Tradition ........................................................ 93 Ontario Iroquois Tradition.......................................... 100 Miscellaneous Untyped Vessels .......................................... 108 VII OTHER CERAMIC ARTIFACTS...................................................... 122 Miniature Vessels.................................................................. 122 Aboriginal Smoking Pipes.................................................... 122 V III INTRASITE DISTRIBUTIONS...................................................... 127 Vertical