The Odyessy of Ape Language

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Odyessy of Ape Language THE ODYESSY OF APE LANGUAGE A SEARCH for Human Uniqueness NICHD Templeton Foundation Ted Townsend Brief Chronology of Ape Language -- See Hillex and Rumbaugh (2004) for chronology from 1000BC to 2004 Ape and Child, Kellogg and Kellogg, The First Signs of Washoe, 1933 Gardner and Gardner, 1969 Reading and Sentence Completion, Rumbaugh, 1972 A Chimpanzee Learns Language, Premack, 1970 Life with Lucy, Fouts, 1972 Conditioned Discrimination Imitation accounts for Nim and Washoe I WAS FOOLED, WE WERE ALL FOOLED! Terrace, 1979 Nim Chimpsky Changed My Mind, Terrace, 1979 Chaining All of these learning processes exist in human language and all of them play a role in language acquisition in children.(Greenfield, 1976). The question was NOT whether these processes occurred in apes, but whether their language could be reduced to these processes alone. Was it stimulus-bound rather than self- guided and reflective?. It’s a social thing It’s a cognitive thing. Reversed Position Left the response to Fouts Terrace ignores the data Can’t point Can’t teach Can’t acquire recursion Can’t vocalize voluntarily Can’t do RMTS Can’t imitate What Had Been Ignored? Training and Emergents a. "Please machine give X" (where X = 8 different foods and drinks b. "Please machine give piece of X" (where X =5 different foods) c. "X give Y" (where X=7 different animates and Y = 8 objects + 13 1. Lana was not imitating different foods and drinks) d. "X move into/out of room" (where X = 7 different animates and 'room' = one room, Lana's room). e. "You put X in machine." (where X = 13 different foods and drinks_ 2. She was not being taught chains or f. "Please machine make X" (where X = 6 different events) conditioned discriminations -- rather g. "Lana want eat/drink X" (where X = 13 different foods and drinks) h. "X tickle (groom, swing)" Y (where X.Y = 7 different animates) both were intermingled i. "Please machine make X " (where X = 6 different events) j. “Question you carry Lana? k. “Name this X” (where X = 6 different foods) l. “Name this X that’s Y(where X = 6 different objects and Y = 6 different colors) 3. Each chain had multiple conditioned discriminations linked to real world events and internal desires 4. Chains were not display based 5. A chimpanzee was creating sentences But these were, in fact, display based By age 4, Lana was employing 69 sequences, not a board with stationary different sentence frames which had symbols. No real world events to emerged from her stock sentences - each of discriminate existed. Consequently nothing which contained as many 135 different could be constructed from these chains. alternatives for the ‘blank’ spaces. Novel Conditions Examples Created by Lana 900 “Sweet Potato name this that’s in cup.” 675 “Juice name this that’s purple in box.” 450 “You put M&M in box.” 225 “Lana want banana that’s in room.” “Lana want eat sweet potato that’s 0 Total Stock Emerged Correct Syntax-E Word-E orange.” Error of Equating Display Based Responses No Real World Linkages With Keyboard Utterances Only Real World Linkages The keyboard was an Inversion of the basic Stimulus-Response approach of Psychology If you did not CONTROL the STIMULUS Presentation - You could not control the RESPONSE In the REAL WORLD there exists and ever changing array of stimuli and the organism determines which ones to attend to and, if linguistic, which utterances to make that direct the attention of others as it desires. ?Tim give Lana Banana which is Black Lana was employing language to direct Tim’s attention to something he was otherwise not going to give to her. Error of Equating Display Based Responses See X -> select order 1,2,3 etc. With Keyboard Utterances See Anything -> Say Anything Order is NOT in the display, it is in the GRAMMAR What does it mean to say the order is IN the GRAMMAR The Grammar was designed by Von Glasserfeld to have a order relevant to spatial and categorical transformations in the real world. Lana acquired the grammar as she acquired an understanding of the real world transformations; they become inextricably linked in her cognitive computations Why was the Research with Lana Stopped? 4 different psychologists (Gardner, Premack, Rumbaugh and Terrace) steeped in learning theory tried 4 different methods and got 4 different results, just as the theory would have predicted. A call went forth to stop all funding in the field, because it was being done by scholars who were either intentionally fraudulent or just plain incompetent. New York Academy of Sciences 1979 Sebeok Terrace The Gardner’s did not attend and they lost their funding. Rumbaugh attended but Tim left the field and Lana was retired from language and moved to counting. Signing efforts continued with Washoe, Moja, Pili, Dar, Koko and Chantek, but reports were few and data was generally ignored as they made no effort to address the ‘learning issues’ or the ‘cueing issues.’ Research Trajectory was stopped by a “replication” that was methodologically inappropriate Lana remains alive and recalls her lexigrams when tested. If funding could be attained to give her a keyboard, she could again produce novel, syntactically appropriate recursive sentences, without imitating and without being cued. R Research moved from ‘stock sentences’ to linguistic communication between chimpanzees It ought to provide for natural communication as well Rule #1 - B needs to ask for food Rule #2 - A needs to give the requested food B Rule #3 order is optional Rule #4 food is to be shared 16 foods available (6 to 10 in a bout) over 100 A lexigrams available THEY WERE CLEARLY CONSCIOUS THAT THEY WERE COMMUNICATING 11 different foods were tested by directionally, both were correct on 90% of the trial #1 presentations apple ?? Share Did they Know That Symbols Communicate and/or That They Need to Communicate? Sa vage-Rumbaugh (1986) It ought to work without the keyboard. It ought to work with novel symbols. = ??? Share Skinner Responded with Pigeons Jill - look at 3 colors, select letter key for each color Jack - look at three letter keys, select color key Spoof Magazinein Science Information was transmitted though Jill to Jack. The Intention to do so and/or the self knowledge that they had done so were considered to be irrelevant, because they were animals. What kinds of socio-linguistic skills emerged? Chimps Pigeons 1. Pointing 2. Joint Attention None reported 3. Joint Regard 4. Turn-taking Science Magazine refused to review any 5. Sensitivity to what the other knows (TOM) more papers. “You can’t even imagine 6. Made their own rules what people say.” Research Trajectory was stopped for a second time by a “replication” that was methodologically inappropriate Sherman is alive and well and recalls his lexigrams. He could be forming novel sentences, even without stock sentence training, if funding were available and if he had a keyboard. Research moved from language TRAINING to Language AQUISITION Growing up in a Pan/Homo, culture from birth to death Recursion Lana: Question you move apple that’s orange into room. (Production) Kanzi: Can you give me the one that Liz had? Can you tell me what Matata said? Panbanisha can you show me where my glasses are? (Comprehension) Many researchers have feared creating these bonds, considering the best interests of the ape. However, in our world, a baby bonding with a human in captivity does not preclude an ape’s ability to recognize another bonobo, nor does it interfere with maternal or reproductive behaviors. However, in palpable ways, there are enormous differences between humanly enculturated apes and those that are not. We all live together in a peaceful, happy harmony; however, we perpetually negotiate sameness and otherness. The following paragraphs are ethnographic narratives which offer insight to the various world views and languages created among our colony and how we manage to live together. Ethnographic observations from Kanzi’s “home” We communicate with all the apes in our colony, but how we communicate with apes with receptive competence for English is quite different and far more efficient than how we communicate with the control group. A very simple example is this: If something unusual is going to happen in the lab, it can be stressful to the apes, such as a big husky repairman is going to fix our clogged potty. The apes will respond to a visitor as though it is a significant threat and danger. So we prepare them for every event we can. With Kanzi and his group, we can explain, “The plumber is coming and he is going to fix our potty so we can have coke with our visitors later.” Kanzi listens, and if he agrees, he will start watching, waiting for the plumber to arrive. We are able to plan three to six hours in advance with Kanzi. When the plumber arrives, Kanzi observes but he understands why the plumber is there and tolerates his presence. All the while, Matata’s non-English group is sending off alarm calls that something bad has come too close. If we had not spoken to Kanzi earlier, gotten his permission that the workman may come, Kanzi and Matata would be vocalizing together: a sonic event that is hard to describe and impossible to forget. Bonobo vocalizations are so loud in indoor spaces that humans’ chest cavities are impacted by the blasts of sound. One cannot think clearly, other than to decide to flee the noise. However, when one has coordinated with Kanzi using English, you can ask him to tell Matata that a good visitor is coming and not to be afraid.
Recommended publications
  • Called “Talking Animals” Taught Us About Human Language?
    Linguistic Frontiers • 1(1) • 14-38 • 2018 DOI: 10.2478/lf-2018-0005 Linguistic Frontiers Representational Systems in Zoosemiotics and Anthroposemiotics Part I: What Have the So- Called “Talking Animals” Taught Us about Human Language? Research Article Vilém Uhlíř* Theoretical and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Philosophy and History of Sciences. Charles University. Viničná 7, 12843 Praha 2, Czech Republic Received ???, 2018; Accepted ???, 2018 Abstract: This paper offers a brief critical review of some of the so-called “Talking Animals” projects. The findings from the projects are compared with linguistic data from Homo sapiens and with newer evidence gleaned from experiments on animal syntactic skills. The question concerning what had the so-called “Talking Animals” really done is broken down into two categories – words and (recursive) syntax. The (relative) failure of the animal projects in both categories points mainly to the fact that the core feature of language – hierarchical recursive syntax – is missing in the pseudo-linguistic feats of the animals. Keywords: language • syntax • representation • meta-representation • zoosemiotics • anthroposemiotics • talking animals • general cognition • representational systems • evolutionary discontinuity • biosemiotics © Sciendo 1. The “Talking Animals” Projects For the sake of brevity, I offer a greatly selective review of some of the more important “Talking Animals” projects. Please note that many omissions were necessary for reasons of space. The “thought climate” of the 1960s and 1970s was formed largely by the Skinnerian zeitgeist, in which it seemed possible to teach any animal to master any, or almost any, skill, including language. Perhaps riding on an ideological wave, following the surprising claims of Fossey [1] and Goodall [2] concerning primates, as well as the claims of Lilly [3] and Batteau and Markey [4] concerning dolphins, many scientists and researchers focussed on the continuities between humans and other species, while largely ignoring the discontinuities and differences.
    [Show full text]
  • David's Memoirs
    Around The World and Back David’s Memoirs by David Zahrt Written by David Zahrt with some supplemental fill in by daughter, Heidi Zahrt Self Published October, 2018 Carson City Nevada All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018 David Zahrt AROUND THE WORLD AND BACK David Zahrt’s Memoirs CHAPTER 1 Marengo, Iowa CHAPTER 2 Turin, Iowa CHAPTER 3 State University of Iowa CHAPTER 4 Drew University CHAPTER 5 Ecumenical Institute CHAPTER 6 Sydney and Oombulgurri, Australia CHAPTER 7 Mill Shoals - Pace - Memphis CHAPTER 8 Kenyan Story CHAPTER 9 Homestead Return CHAPTER 10 Carson City CHAPTER 11 Musical Journey CHAPTER 12 Bicycle Trails 1 2 FOREWORD Over the years, my father, David Zahrt, spent countless hours reflecting on and writing about his life. It is a treasure for us that he has had the foresight and wisdom to record his experiences to share with his grandchildren and future generations. I am grateful that David and Linda Zahrt are Jay’s and my parents and for the life we have been given. Working with him to create this book and reading his recollections I see his life as a gift from a new perspective. This quote from one of Dad’s files shows that an underlying theme in his belief system is gratitude. “I return to A GRATEFUL HEART. One of my favorite prayers is found on page 22. It is adapted from the Week of Prayer for World Peace, 1978. We pray for the power to be gentle; the strength to be forgiving; the patience to be understanding; and the endurance to accept the consequences to holding to what we believe to be right.
    [Show full text]
  • Planeta De Los Simios Miguel Abad Vila Centro De Saúde “Novoa Santos”
    RMC Original JMM Darwin en el planeta de los simios Miguel Abad Vila Centro de Saúde “Novoa Santos”. Rúa Juan XXIII nº 6. 32003 Ourense (España). Correspondencia: Miguel Abad Vila. Avenida de la Habana, 21, 2º. 32003 Ourense (España). e‐mail: [email protected] Recibido el 21 de febrero de 2015; aceptado el 4 de marzo de 2015. Resumen Las relaciones entre primates humanos y no humanos han sido fuente de inspiración para la ciencia y el arte. El planeta de los simios/ Planet of the Apes (1968) de Franklin J. Schaffner representó el punto de partida para una serie de películas y series de televisión estructuradas en una hipotética sociedad donde los simios dominaban a los seres humanos. Palabras clave: evolución, primates, derechos de los animales, ciencia ficción. Summary The relationship between human and non‐human primates have been a source of inspiration for scien‐ ce and art. Planet of the Apes (1968) represented the starting point for a series of films and television series structured in a hypothetical dominated society where the apes dominate the humans. Keywords: Evolution, Primates, Rights of the animals, Science fiction. El autor declara que el trabajo ha sido publicado en gran parte con anterioridad1. El actual es una actualización. 203 Rev Med Cine 2015; 11(4): 203‐214 © Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca J Med Mov 2015; 11(4): 203‐214 M Abad Vila Darwin en el planeta de los simios “Hay ciento noventa y tres especies vivientes de simios y monos. El propio Boulle fue el galardonado con el Óscar al mejor Ciento noventa y dos de ellas están cubiertas de pelo.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York ______
    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK __________________________________________________ In the Matter of a Proceeding under Article 70 of the CPLR for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, THE NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., on behalf of KIKO, MEMORANDUM OF Petitioner, LAW IN SUPPORT OF -against- PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS CARMEN PRESTI, individually and as an officer and director of The Primate Sanctuary, Inc., CHRISTIE E. Index No. PRESTI, individually and as an officer and director of The Primate Sanctuary, Inc., and THE PRIMATE SANCTUARY, INC., Respondents. __________________________________________________ Elizabeth Stein, Esq. Attorney for Petitioner 5 Dunhill Road New Hyde Park, NY 11040 Phone (516) 747-4726 Steven M. Wise, Esq. Attorney for Petitioner 5195 NW 112th Terrace Coral Springs, FL 33076 Phone (954) 648-9864 Elizabeth Stein, Esq. Steven M. Wise, Esq. Subject to pro hac vice admission January_____, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................................................................................ v I. SUMMARY OF NEW GROUNDS AND FACTS NEITHER PRESENTED NOR DETERMINED IN NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., EX REL. KIKO v. PRESTI OR NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC. ON BEHALF OF TOMMY v. LAVERY. ............................................................................................................. 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY .................................................... 6 III. STATEMENT OF FACTS ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Sharing Intentions: the Origins of Cultural Cognition
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2005) 28, 675–735 Printed in the United States of America Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition Michael Tomasello, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne, and Henrike Moll Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] http://www.eva.mpg.de/psycho/ Abstract: We propose that the crucial difference between human cognition and that of other species is the ability to participate with others in collaborative activities with shared goals and intentions: shared intentionality. Participation in such activities requires not only especially powerful forms of intention reading and cultural learning, but also a unique motivation to share psychological states with oth- ers and unique forms of cognitive representation for doing so. The result of participating in these activities is species-unique forms of cultural cognition and evolution, enabling everything from the creation and use of linguistic symbols to the construction of social norms and individual beliefs to the establishment of social institutions. In support of this proposal we argue and present evidence that great apes (and some children with autism) understand the basics of intentional action, but they still do not participate in activities involving joint intentions and attention (shared intentionality). Human children’s skills of shared intentionality develop gradually during the first 14 months of life as two ontogenetic pathways intertwine: (1) the general ape line of understanding others as animate, goal-directed, and intentional agents; and (2) a species-unique motivation to share emotions, experience, and activities with other persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Uniqueness in the Age of Ape Language Research1
    Society and Animals 18 (2010) 397-412 brill.nl/soan Human Uniqueness in the Age of Ape Language Research1 Mary Trachsel University of Iowa [email protected] Abstract This paper summarizes the debate on human uniqueness launched by Charles Darwin’s publi- cation of The Origin of Species in 1859. In the progress of this debate, Noam Chomsky’s intro- duction of the Language-Acquisition Device (LAD) in the mid-1960s marked a turn to the machine model of mind that seeks human uniqueness in uniquely human components of neu- ral circuitry. A subsequent divergence from the machine model can be traced in the short his- tory of ape language research (ALR). In the past fifty years, the focus of ALR has shifted from the search for behavioral evidence of syntax in the minds of individual apes to participant- observation of coregulated interactions between humans and nonhuman apes. Rejecting the computational machine model of mind, the laboratory methodologies of ALR scientists Tetsuro Matsuzawa and Sue Savage-Rumbaugh represent a worldview coherent with Darwin’s continu- ity hypothesis. Keywords ape language research, artificial intelligence, Chomsky, comparative psychology, Darwin, human uniqueness, social cognition Introduction Nothing at first can appear more difficult to believe than that the more complex organs and instincts should have been perfected, not by means superior to, though analogous with, human reason, but by the accumulation of innumerable slight variations, each good for the individual possessor. (Darwin, 1989b, p. 421) With the publication of The Origin of Species (1859/1989a), Charles Darwin steered science directly into a conversation about human uniqueness previ- ously dominated by religion and philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Humanities and Posthumanism
    english edition 1 2015 The Humanities and Posthumanism issue editor GRZEGORZ GROCHOWSKI MICHAł PAWEł MARKOWSKI Humanities: an Unfinished Project E WA DOMAńSKA Ecological Humanities R YSZARD NYCZ Towards Innovative Humanities: The Text as a Laboratory. Traditions, Hypotheses, Ideas O LGA CIELEMęCKA Angelus Novus Looks to the Future. On the Anti-Humanism Which Overcomes Nothingness SYZ MON WRÓBEL Domesticating Animals: A Description of a Certain Disturbance teksty drugie · Institute of Literary Research Polish Academy of Science index 337412 · pl issn 0867-0633 EDITORIAL BOARD Agata Bielik-Robson (uk), Włodzimierz Bolecki, Maria Delaperrière (France), Ewa Domańska, Grzegorz Grochowski, Zdzisław Łapiński, Michał Paweł Markowski (usa), Maciej Maryl, Jakub Momro, Anna Nasiłowska (Deputy Editor-in-Chief), Leonard Neuger (Sweden), Ryszard Nycz (Editor-in-Chief), Bożena Shallcross (usa), Marta Zielińska, Tul’si Bhambry (English Translator and Language Consultant), Justyna Tabaszewska, Marta Bukowiecka (Managing Editor) ADVISORY BOARD Edward Balcerzan, Stanisław Barańczak (usa) , Małgorzata Czermińska, Paweł Dybel, Knut Andreas Grimstad (Norway), Jerzy Jarzębski, Bożena Karwowska (Canada), Krzysztof Kłosiński, Dorota Krawczyńska, Vladimir Krysinski (Canada), Luigi Marinelli (Italy ), Arent van Nieukerken (Holland), Ewa Rewers, German Ritz (Switzerland), Henryk Siewierski (Brasil), Janusz Sławiński , Ewa Thompson (usa), Joanna Tokarska-Bakir, Tamara Trojanowska (Canada), Alois Woldan (Austria), Anna Zeidler-Janiszewska ADDRESS Nowy Świat 72, room.
    [Show full text]
  • LING 001 Introduction to Linguistics
    LING 001 Introduction to Linguistics Lecture #6 Animal Communication 2 02/05/2020 Katie Schuler Announcements • Exam 1 is next class (Monday)! • Remember there are no make-up exams (but your lowest exam score will be dropped) How to do well on the exam • Review the study guides • Make sure you can answer the practice problems • Come on time (exam is 50 minutes) • We MUST leave the room for the next class First two questions are easy Last time • Communication is everywhere in the animal kingdom! • Human language is • An unbounded discrete combinatorial system • Many animals have elements of this: • Honeybees, songbirds, primates • But none quite have language Case Study #4: Can Apes learn Language? Ape Projects • Viki (oral production) • Sign Language: • Washoe (Gardiner) (chimp) • Nim Chimpsky (Terrace) (chimp) • Koko (Patterson) (gorilla) • Kanzi (Savage-Rumbaugh) (bonobo) Viki’s `speech’ • Raised by psychologists • Tried to teach her oral language, but didn’t get far... Later Attempts • Later attempts used non-oral languages — • either symbols (Sarah, Kanzi) or • ASL (Washoe, Koko, Nim). • Extensive direct instruction by humans. • Many problems of interpretation and evaluation. Main one: is this a • miniature/incipient unbounded discrete combinatorial system, or • is it just rote learning+randomness? Washoe and Koko Video Washoe • A chimp who was extensively trained to use ASL by the Gardners • Knew 132 signs by age 5, and over 250 by the end of her life. • Showed some productive use (‘water bird’) • And even taught her adopted son Loulis some signs But the only deaf, native signer on the team • ‘Every time the chimp made a sign, we were supposed to write it down in the log… They were always complaining because my log didn’t show enough signs.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiswahili for Foreigners ( Pdfdrive.Com ) (1).Pdf
    KISWAHILI FOR FOREIGNERS By AMIR. A. MOHAMED FIRST EDITION 1993 SECOND EDITION 2000 THIRD EDITION 2009 © Create Space 0f Amazon.com CONTENTS – YALIYOMO Page FOREWORD Ukurasa I INTRODUCTION – 1 KITANGULIZI II THE SOUND 2 SYSTEM III ROOTS, STEMS, 3 AFFIXES IV NOUNS AND 4 CLASSIFICATION V VERB AND THEIR 11 TENSES VI COMPOUND 16 TENSES VII PRONOUNS 17 VIII ADJECTIVES 22 X ADVERBS 25 XI PREPOSITONS 29 AND CONJUCTIONS XII VOBABULARY – 33 MSAMIATI XIII KISWAHILI 46 SAYING – MISEMO YA KISWAHILI XIV EXERCISE – 52 MZOESI XV KISWAHILI WORD 65 – 124 POWER IX KISWAHILI SLANGS & BOMBASTCS – SIMO ZA KISWAHILI 125-174 IIX BIBLIOGRAPHY FOREWORD Kiswahili*is a growing language in Africa and the world as a whole. There are historians who believe that Kiswahili is probably nine hundred years old and like other languages, its significance can be proved by the growing demand of its usage and the constant increase in the world of the need to learn and to speak Kiswahili. The world is entering into the new millennium and we are all striving to have a better life and a peaceful world. Therefore, it has now become increasingly necessary for foreigners to learn Kiswahili no matter what they do and no matter where they are. Besides the social and economic dimensions of the language abroad like working in East Africa or just on holidays, learning the language may help to improve the race relations between Africans and foreigners. It’s time to learn to understand each other and to know how to make perfect moves in our lives. History of the language reveals that Kiswahili is of Bantu origin but heavily loaded with Arabic, English, Indian and other oriental words.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrews Tove.Pdf (1.498Mb)
    MASTEROPPGAVE Project Sci-fi: I n v i t i n g a l i e n s a n d r o b o t s i n t o t h e E n g l i s h c l a s s r o o m , h o w f i c t i o n a l c u l t u r e s c a n p r o m o t e d e v e l o p m e n t o f i n t e r c u l t u r a l c o m p e t e n c e Tove Lora Andrews 06.11.2019 Master Fremmedspråk i skolen Avdeling for økonomi, språk og samfunsdag Abstract Little focus has been placed on why English teachers in Norway should favour intercultural competence over cultural facts. Yet knowing cultural facts do not make pupils effective communicators, which is the purpose for language learning. Intercultural competence prepares pupils for intercultural encounters, through a conglomeration of open attitudes, accurate knowledge, insightful understanding, appropriate skills, and practical application. Literature is a common and efficient means of exploring culture and intercultural encounters within a classroom setting. Both multicultural literature and science fiction explore cultural themes and identity, but the latter explores a broader range of contemporary topics. Therefore, this thesis sought to explore to what extent science fiction could be used to promote intercultural competence in the English classroom. Analysing fiction and imaginary cultures circumvented pitfalls common to multicultural literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Human Primates and Language: Paper
    Non-human primates and language: paper http://www.angelfire.com/sc2/nhplanguage/ftpaper.html Language competence in NHPs An assessment of the field in the light of a 'universal grammar' "The Berlin wall is down, and so is the wall that separates man from chimpanzee." (Elizabeth Bates) "There is no debate, so I have no opinion." (Noam Chomsky) 0 Introduction The language competence of non-human primates is one of the most controversial issues in present-day linguistics, with disbelief ranging from bored indifference to vitriolic accusations of fraud. The present paper aims to assess the current state of debate from an open-minded, critical and detached perspective. In a first part, a brief outline of earlier research in the language abilities of non-human primates - more precisely of apes (bonobos, urang-utangs, chimpanzees and gorillas) - is sketched. The second part focusses on the landmark studies published by Dr. Emily Sue Savage-Rumbaugh and her colleagues. A third section looks into the views of the Chomskyan field, leading up to the concluding section on the innateness debate. 1 Early research on non-human primates' capability for language 1.1 Attempts to teach NHPs to speak The language capability of non-human primates has been a subject of research since the beginning of this century. In 1909 already did Witmer attempt to teach a chimpanzee to talk. He claims that the chimpanzee was capable of articulating the word ‘mama’. In 1916 Furness taught an orang-utan to say the words ‘papa’ and ‘cup’. After the unexpected death of this orang-utan, Kellogg and Kellogg wanted to follow up this work.
    [Show full text]
  • In Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes)
    2018, 31 David Washburn Special Issue Editor Peer-reviewed Assessing Distinctiveness Effects and “False Memories” in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) Bonnie M. Perdue1, Andrew J. Kelly2, and Michael J. Beran3 1 Agnes Scott College 2 Georgia Gwinnett College 3 Georgia State University There are many parallels between human and nonhuman animal cognitive abilities, suggesting an evolutionary basis for many forms of cognition, including memory. For instance, past research has found that 2 chimpanzees exhibited an isolation effect, or improved memory for semantically distinctive items on a list (Beran, 2011). These results support the notion that chimpanzees are capable of semantic, relational processing in memory and introduce the possibility that other effects observed in humans, such as distinctiveness effects or false memories, may be present in nonhuman species. The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is a commonly- used task to explore these phenomena, and it was adapted for use with chimpanzees. We tested 4 chimpanzees for isolation effects during encoding, distinctiveness effects during recognition, and potential “false memories” generated by the DRM paradigm by presenting a serial recognition memory task. The isolation effect previously reported (Beran, 2011) was not replicated in this experiment. Two of four chimpanzees showed improved recognition performance when information about distinctiveness could be used to exclude incorrect responses. None of the chimpanzees were significantly impaired in the “false memory” condition. However, limitations to this approach are discussed that require caution about assuming identical memory processes in these chimpanzees and in humans. Keywords: chimpanzees, memory, DRM illusion, isolation effect, false memory, distinctiveness, relational processing Research in the 20th century redefined our understanding of ape minds, especially the pioneering work of Dr.
    [Show full text]