Delayed Hard Palate Closure: the Cessfully Closed Before 1 Year of Age and Philosophy Revisited" by Drs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Delayed Hard Palate Closure: the Cessfully Closed Before 1 Year of Age and Philosophy Revisited LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Timing of Palatal Closure Should Not not be dependent on age alone. There are be Based on Age Alone _ instances when the hard palate can be suc- In "Delayed Hard Palate Closure: The cessfully closed before 1 year of age and _ Philosophy Revisited" by Drs. Witzel, Sal- other instances when it should not be closed yer, and Ross published in the October until 3 years of age or even later, in order 1984 issue of the Journal, an extensive re- to avoid growth-inhibiting and palate-de- view of the literature covering the pros and forming scar tissue. _ cons for doing early or late palatal closure It is unfortunate that some speech pa- is presented. The readers must conclude, thologists and surgeons still advocate early as the authors do, that the arguments for palatal closure (before 1 year of age), even either side are not conclusive due to the when it has been documented that in some inability of the investigators to control all cases poor speech can result from early the variables which effect speech. Unfor- closure and good speech can result from tunately, the authors also present unsub- late closure. It is time for all specialties to stantiated data to support an opinion, "that agree that there need not be any trade offs the incidence of VPI is significantly greater in objectives and that surgical treatment when the two-stage palate repair is used". needs to be individualized in order to at- They say, "it is likely (and we observe this tain the best results. clinically) that the soft palate may not Samuel Berkowitz, D.D.S., M.S. function as well in the face of an opening 6601 SW. 80th Street in the hard palate where there is leakage South Miami, FL 33143 of air pressure (Shelton and Blank 1984)". It must be stressed that this is an unsup- ported subjective opinion that is not backed Replies to Dr. Berkowitz up by proper diagnostic evaluation, such We wish to thank Dr. Berkowitz for as the use of lateral cephaloradiography, reading our article "Delayed Hard Palate nasopharyngoscopy, or videofluroscopy. Closure: The Philosophy Revisited". The Our own studies, which will be pub- purpose of our essay was to examine the lished in the proceedings of an interna- literature concerning the technique of de- tional conference of the British Craniofa- layed hard palate closure. cial Anomalies Society, held in England in Dr. Berkowitz states that we presented 1983, show that VPI is the function of unsubstantiated data to support an opin- many physiological and anatomical fac- ion. The statement in question simply tors. Among these factors are the depth of summarizes the available published re- nasopharyngeal space, the length and search studies concerning the incidence of thickness of the soft palate, and the action velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in pa- of the pharyngeal and soft palate muscu- tients treated with the two-stage palate re- lature, timed to speech production. This pair technique. same study demonstrates that good speech We do suggest, based on our clinical ob- and good facial palate development and servations, that the soft palate may not occlusion can be obtained simultaneously function as well when there is air leakage if palatal closure (timing and type of pro- through an opening in the hard palate. We cedure) is individualized, that is, related to know of no way to clinically observe soft the size of the cleft space and the amount palate function without using videofluo- of surrounding palatal tissue, and should roscopy or fibreoptics. Our routine clinical 132 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 133 observation of soft palate function always ety International Meeting, Birmingham, England includes one and in most cases both of these 1983. techniques (Witzel, 1983). The observa- Mary Anne Witzel, Ph.D. tions are qualitatively classified jointly by Hospital for Sick Children a speech pathologist and, depending on the Toronto, Canada technique, either a radiologist or a plastic Kenneth E. Salyer, M.D. surgeon. Lateral cephaloradiographs are Foundation for Craniofacial Deformities not considered to be reliable in the assess- Dallas, TX ment of velopharyngeal function (Wil- liams and Eisenbach, 1981), and we have not subjected patients to this technique Individualizing Treatment since the early 1970s. The statement was The criticism by Dr. Berkowitz of our put forth as one explanation for the re- analysis of the literature is, apparently, ported incidence of VPI in these patients based on his opinion that delayed hard and as a topic for investigation. palate repair would be advantageous for In our article, we made a plea for ad- the speech and facial growth of some in- herence to the scientific method of re- dividuals. His own unsubstantiated theory search and close cooperation among speech is that it is possible to vary cleft palate sur- pathologists, dentists, and plastic sur- gery to suit the individual situation. He was geons, in order to determine the best particularly critical of the speech aspect of treatment techniques. The paper that Dr. the survey, and I believe this illustrates a Berkowitz presented at the British Cranio- far too prevalent occurrence in the liter- facial Society International Meeting in 1983 ature, where a specialist in one discipline does not in its authorship reflect this co- unwisely claims very sophisticated knowl- operation. Furthermore, to our knowl- edge in another. edge, there is no published evidence to Individualization of treatment is a very show that it is possible to predict speech old concept, one which is taken for granted potential in an infant. Individualizing in many situations by most clinical disci- treatment then becomes a guessing game. plines. In orthodontics, for example, a de- Our review pointed out that in six of tailed treatment program for one individ- seven studies speech problems were severe ual may not apply exactly to any other in patients who had treatment by the de- individual. The result, however, is ex- layed hard palate closure technique. pected to be almost identical to all other Therefore, we feel that it is fortunate that results. To dispute the validity of individ- most speech pathologists and surgeons ad- ualization in a clinical situation is tanta- vocate early complete palatal closure. It is mount to supporting sin or decrying not yet time for the specialties of speech motherhood. pathology, dentistry, and plastic surgery It is not enough, however, to state the to agree on treatment methods for pa- obvious and note that all individuals are tients with cleft lip and palate. The time different; one must also add that they are to agree is when we have valid and reliable all almost the same. It is the subtle inter- assessments of the major treatment tech- play of similarities and differences that niques. makes diagnosis and treatment so difficult in the child with cleft lip and palate. The first step is to identify the individ- References ual's problems and determine (from ex- WITZEL MA. Speech problems in craniofacial anoma- perience with similar individuals) what the lies. Communicative Disorders 1983; 8:45. natural history might be. In this context, WILLIAMS WN, EIsENBACH CR. Assessing VP func- that means identifying the speech and tion: the lateral skill technique vs cinefluourogra- phy. Cleft Palate J 1981; 18:45. growth potentials of the infant. Next, we BERKOWITZ S. Neo-natal maxillary orthopedics-a must know all of the treatment options that dissent. Paper presented at the Craniofacial Soci- are available and what precise effect each 134 Cleft Palate. Journal; April 1985, Vol. 22 No. i? will have on the condition. Only then is it may well be a serious speech consequence possible to choose a specific program of to any delay, as our article suggests. treatment. We are not in a position at this I am afraid that Dr. Berkowitz is de- time to accomplish either of these steps, fending an approach which is self-evident although recent studies are improving our and does not require defending, but un- understanding of the problem. i fortunately there is no evidence that it In his letter, Dr. Berkowitz makes two can be accomplished! incredible (and, in my opinion, erroneous) assumptions. First, he claims that it is pos- References sible to predict by observing the width of Ross BR. Variables affecting facial growth in cleft lip the cleft and the amount of surrounding and palate. Transactions of the International Cleft palatal tissue in a neonate whether that Palate Conference, Zurich, 1984 (in press). infant will have a speech or facial growth SCHWARTZ BH, LONG RE, SMITH RJ, GirE DP. Early prediction of posterior crossbite in the complete problem in later years. Schwartz et al (1984) unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1984; made a good start at isolating morpholog- 21:76. ical factors related to simple crossbites in R. Bruce Ross, D.D.S. the primary and mixed dentitions. Our Hospital for Sick Children growth studies, some of which were pub- Toronto, Canada lished in the Proceedings of the British Craniofacial Society Meeting 1983, have shown rather conclusively that it is impos- sible to predict final facial morphology and Vowel Oral Air Flow Rates and Air jaw relations even in a 6 year old. Careful Volumes for Vowels monitoring of facial growth up to age 10 The excellent paper by Stathopoulos or 12 will permit a good estimate of the (1984) provides important information on growth pattern and the final relations. I air flow during vowel productions that will listened to Dr. Berkowitz's presentation in be useful in assessment of speech disor- Britain but failed to hear any evidence to ders. I would like to explain what appears support the claims expressed in his letter.
Recommended publications
  • Pattern of Third Molar Impaction; Correlation with Malocclusion And
    Pattern of Third Molar Impaction; Correlation with Malocclusion and Facial Growth SograYassaei1, Farhad O Wlia2, Zahra Ebrahimi Nik3 1Associate professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 89195/165, Iran. 2Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.3Postgraduate student of orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd 89195/165, Iran. Abstract Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the type of mandibular and maxillary third molar impaction in different malocclusions and facial growth patterns. Method and materials: In this descriptive cross sectional study, 364 impacted third molars of patients referring to the orthodontic department of Yazd University were assessed radio graphically. Also, the type of malocclusion and the facial growth pattern was determined by analyzing their lateral cephalograms. Collected data were entered to a computer and statistical tests (Chi-square) were carried out using SPSS16. Results: Significant correlation was found between the type of mandibular third molar impaction (based on Pell Gregory classification) and different types of malocclusion. Also, the dominant form of impaction (based on winter classification) among different types of facial growth pattern was the vertical one. Conclusion According to the results of this study, the vertical level of mandibular third molar impaction relative to the adjacent second molar impaction was statistically associated to the type of malocclusion. Also, we found no correlation between the M3s impaction and the type of facial growth pattern. Key Words: Third molar Impaction, Malocclusion, Facial growth pattern Introduction (2010) found higher incidence of mandibular M3s impaction The impacted tooth is one that fails to erupt into the dental in malocclusion class III [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Benign Fibro-Osseous Lesions Plus…
    “Vision is the art of seeing things invisible.” Jonathan Swift 1667 - 1745 Benign Fibro-osseous Lesions Plus… Steven R. Singer, DDS [email protected] 212.305.5674 Benign Fibro-osseous Lesions Fibrous Dysplasia A group of lesions in which normal bone is Localized change in bone metabolism replaced initially by fibrous connective tissue Normal cancellous bone is replaced by Over time, the lesion is infiltrated by osteoid fibrous connective tissue and cementoid tissue The connective tissue contains varying amounts of abnormal bone with irregular This is a benign and idiopathic process trabeculae Trabeculae are randomly oriented. (Remember that normal trabeculae are aligned to respond to stress) Fibrous Dysplasia Fibrous Dysplasia Lesions may be solitary (monostotic) or Fibrous dysplasia is non-hereditary involve more than one bone (polyostotic) Caused by a mutation in a somatic cell. Monostotic form accounts for 70% of all Extent of lesions depends on the timing of cases the mutation. Polyostotic form is more common in the first If the mutation occurs earlier, the disease decade will be more widespread throughout the M=F except in McCune-Albright syndrome, body. An example is McCune-Albright which is almost exclusively found in females Syndrome 1 Fibrous Dysplasia Fibrous Dysplasia McCune-Albright Syndrome • Monostotic and polyostotic forms usually -Almost exclusively begins in the second decade of life females -Polyostotic fibrous • Slow, painless expansion of the jaws dysplasia • Patients may complain of swelling or have
    [Show full text]
  • Tutankhamun's Dentition: the Pharaoh and His Teeth
    Brazilian Dental Journal (2015) 26(6): 701-704 ISSN 0103-6440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300431 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Tutankhamun’s Dentition: Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany The Pharaoh and his Teeth 2Institute of Egyptology/Egyptian Museum Georg Steindorff, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany 3Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany Niels Christian Pausch1, Franziska Naether2, Karl Friedrich Krey3 Correspondence: Dr. Niels Christian Pausch, Liebigstraße 12, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Tel: +49- 341-97-21160. e-mail: niels. [email protected] Tutankhamun was a Pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty (New Kingdom) in ancient Egypt. Medical and radiological investigations of his skull revealed details about the jaw and teeth status of the mummy. Regarding the jaw relation, a maxillary prognathism, a mandibular retrognathism and micrognathism have been discussed previously. A cephalometric analysis was performed using a lateral skull X-ray and a review of the literature regarding Key Words: Tutankhamun’s King Tutankhamun´s mummy. The results imply diagnosis of mandibular retrognathism. dentition, cephalometric analysis, Furthermore, third molar retention and an incomplete, single cleft palate are present. mandibular retrognathism Introduction also been discussed (11). In 1922, the British Egyptologist Howard Carter found the undisturbed mummy of King Tutankhamun. The Case Report spectacular discovery enabled scientists of the following In the evaluation of Tutankhamun’s dentition and jaw decades to analyze the Pharaoh's remains. The mummy alignment, contemporary face reconstructions and coeval underwent multiple autopsies. Until now, little was artistic images can be of further use. However, the ancient published about the jaw and dentition of the King.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterisation of Noonan-Like
    1of5 ELECTRONIC LETTER J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.2004.024091 on 2 February 2005. Downloaded from Phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of Noonan-like/ multiple giant cell lesion syndrome J S Lee, M Tartaglia, B D Gelb, K Fridrich, S Sachs, C A Stratakis, M Muenke, P G Robey, M T Collins, A Slavotinek ............................................................................................................................... J Med Genet 2005;42:e11 (http://www.jmedgenet.com/cgi/content/full/42/2/e11). doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.024091 oonan-like/multiple giant cell lesion syndrome (NL/ MGCLS; OMIM 163955) is a rare condition1–3 with Key points Nphenotypic overlap with Noonan’s syndrome (OMIM 163950) and cherubism (OMIM 118400) (table 1). N Noonan-like/multiple giant cell lesion syndrome (NL/ Recently, missense mutations in the PTPN11 gene on MGCLS) has clinical similarities with Noonan’s syn- chromosome 12q24.1 have been identified as the cause of drome and cherubism. It is unclear whether it is a Noonan’s syndrome in 45% of familial and sporadic cases,45 distinct entity or a variant of Noonan’s syndrome or indicating genetic heterogeneity within the syndrome. In the cherubism. 5 study by Tartaglia et al, there was a family in which three N Three unrelated patients with NL/MGCLS were char- members had features of Noonan’s syndrome; two of these acterised, two of whom were found to have mutations had incidental mandibular giant cell lesions.3 All three in the PTPN11 gene, the mutation found in 45% of members were found to have a PTPN11 mutation known to patients with Noonan’s syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Therapeutic Management of Patients with Class III Skeletal Malocclusion
    Szpyt Justyna, Gębska Magdalena. Therapeutic management of patients with class III skeletal malocclusion. Mandibular prognathism, maxillary retrognathism – a case report. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2019;9(5):20-31. eISSN 2391-8306. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2656446 http://ojs.ukw.edu.pl/index.php/johs/article/view/6872 https://pbn.nauka.gov.pl/sedno-webapp/works/912455 The journal has had 7 points in Ministry of Science and Higher Education parametric evaluation. Part B item 1223 (26/01/2017). 1223 Journal of Education, Health and Sport eISSN 2391-8306 7 © The Authors 2019; This article is published with open access at Licensee Open Journal Systems of Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz, Poland Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author (s) and source are credited. This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non commercial license Share alike. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper. Received: 15.04.2019. Revised: 25.04.2019. Accepted: 01.05.2019. Therapeutic management of patients with class III skeletal malocclusion. Mandibular prognathism, maxillary retrognathism – a case report Justyna Szpyt1, Magdalena Gębska2 1. Physiotherapy student, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin.
    [Show full text]
  • Cherubism As a Systemic Skeletal Disease
    Morice et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2020) 21:564 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03580-z CASE REPORT Open Access Cherubism as a systemic skeletal disease: evidence from an aggressive case Anne Morice1,2,3,4*, Aline Joly3,4, Manon Ricquebourg5,6, Gérard Maruani2,7,8, Emmanuel Durand9, Louise Galmiche2,10, Jeanne Amiel2,11, Yoann Vial12,13, Hélène Cavé12,13, Kahina Belhous14, Marie Piketty15, Martine Cohen-Solal6, Ariane Berdal1,16, Corinne Collet5,6, Arnaud Picard1,2,3,4, Amelie E. Coudert1,6,16† and Natacha Kadlub1,2,3,4† Abstract Background: Cherubism is a rare autosomal dominant genetic condition caused by mutations in the SH3BP2 gene. This disease is characterized by osteolysis of the jaws, with the bone replaced by soft tissue rich in fibroblasts and multinuclear giant cells. SH3BP2 is a ubiquitous adaptor protein yet the consequences of SH3BP2 mutation have so far been described as impacting only face. Cherubism mouse models have been generated and unlike human patients, the knock-in mice exhibit systemic bone loss together with a systemic inflammation. Case presentation: In light of these observations, we decided to search for a systemic cherubism phenotype in a 6-year-old girl with an aggressive cherubism. We report here the first case of cherubism with systemic manifestations. Bone densitometry showed low overall bone density (total body Z-score = − 4.6 SD). Several markers of bone remodelling (CTx,BALP,P1NP)aswellasinflammation(TNFα and IL-1) were elevated. A causative second-site mutation in other genes known to influence bone density was ruled out by sequencing a panel of such genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of the Digestive System (KOO-K93)
    CHAPTER XI Diseases of the digestive system (KOO-K93) Diseases of oral cavity, salivary glands and jaws (KOO-K14) lijell Diseases of pulp and periapical tissues 1m Dentofacial anomalies [including malocclusion] Excludes: hemifacial atrophy or hypertrophy (Q67.4) K07 .0 Major anomalies of jaw size Hyperplasia, hypoplasia: • mandibular • maxillary Macrognathism (mandibular)(maxillary) Micrognathism (mandibular)( maxillary) Excludes: acromegaly (E22.0) Robin's syndrome (087.07) K07 .1 Anomalies of jaw-cranial base relationship Asymmetry of jaw Prognathism (mandibular)( maxillary) Retrognathism (mandibular)(maxillary) K07.2 Anomalies of dental arch relationship Cross bite (anterior)(posterior) Dis to-occlusion Mesio-occlusion Midline deviation of dental arch Openbite (anterior )(posterior) Overbite (excessive): • deep • horizontal • vertical Overjet Posterior lingual occlusion of mandibular teeth 289 ICO-N A K07.3 Anomalies of tooth position Crowding Diastema Displacement of tooth or teeth Rotation Spacing, abnormal Transposition Impacted or embedded teeth with abnormal position of such teeth or adjacent teeth K07.4 Malocclusion, unspecified K07.5 Dentofacial functional abnormalities Abnormal jaw closure Malocclusion due to: • abnormal swallowing • mouth breathing • tongue, lip or finger habits K07.6 Temporomandibular joint disorders Costen's complex or syndrome Derangement of temporomandibular joint Snapping jaw Temporomandibular joint-pain-dysfunction syndrome Excludes: current temporomandibular joint: • dislocation (S03.0) • strain (S03.4) K07.8 Other dentofacial anomalies K07.9 Dentofacial anomaly, unspecified 1m Stomatitis and related lesions K12.0 Recurrent oral aphthae Aphthous stomatitis (major)(minor) Bednar's aphthae Periadenitis mucosa necrotica recurrens Recurrent aphthous ulcer Stomatitis herpetiformis 290 DISEASES OF THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM Diseases of oesophagus, stomach and duodenum (K20-K31) Ill Oesophagitis Abscess of oesophagus Oesophagitis: • NOS • chemical • peptic Use additional external cause code (Chapter XX), if desired, to identify cause.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence and Incidence of Rare Diseases: Bibliographic Data
    Number 1 | January 2019 Prevalence and incidence of rare diseases: Bibliographic data Prevalence, incidence or number of published cases listed by diseases (in alphabetical order) www.orpha.net www.orphadata.org If a range of national data is available, the average is Methodology calculated to estimate the worldwide or European prevalence or incidence. When a range of data sources is available, the most Orphanet carries out a systematic survey of literature in recent data source that meets a certain number of quality order to estimate the prevalence and incidence of rare criteria is favoured (registries, meta-analyses, diseases. This study aims to collect new data regarding population-based studies, large cohorts studies). point prevalence, birth prevalence and incidence, and to update already published data according to new For congenital diseases, the prevalence is estimated, so scientific studies or other available data. that: Prevalence = birth prevalence x (patient life This data is presented in the following reports published expectancy/general population life expectancy). biannually: When only incidence data is documented, the prevalence is estimated when possible, so that : • Prevalence, incidence or number of published cases listed by diseases (in alphabetical order); Prevalence = incidence x disease mean duration. • Diseases listed by decreasing prevalence, incidence When neither prevalence nor incidence data is available, or number of published cases; which is the case for very rare diseases, the number of cases or families documented in the medical literature is Data collection provided. A number of different sources are used : Limitations of the study • Registries (RARECARE, EUROCAT, etc) ; The prevalence and incidence data presented in this report are only estimations and cannot be considered to • National/international health institutes and agencies be absolutely correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeletal Malocclusion and Genetic Expression: an Evidence
    JDSM REVIEW ARTICLES http://dx.doi.org/10.15331/jdsm.5720 Skeletal Malocclusion and Genetic Expression: An Evidence- Based Review Clarice Nishio, DDS, MSc, PhD; Nelly Huynh, PhD Faculty of Dentistry, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada Altered dentofacial morphology is an important risk factor of obstructive sleep apnea by compromising the upper airway volume. Maxillary and/or mandibular retrognathia, narrow maxilla, and long face are the most common craniofacial risk factors of sleep- disordered breathing. The etiology of dentofacial variation and malocclusion is multifactorial, which includes the influence of genetic and environmental factors acting on the units of the craniofacial complex. There is very little evidence on the reverse relationship, where changes in malocclusion could affect gene expression. The advances in human genetics and molecular biology have contributed to the identification of relevant genetic markers associated with certain skeletal malocclusions and/or dental malformations. Since some studies have observed differences between siblings, between parents/children, and between monozygotic twin pairs, this evidence suggests a significant influence of environmental factors in the development of dentofacial structures. However, the skeletal craniofacial complex has been systematically documented to be more influenced by genetic factors than the dental malocclusion. The greater the genetic component, the lower the rate of success on the outcome of orthodontic treatment. The real therapy should be an eventual modification of the gene responsible for the malocclusion; however, this is yet a theoretical proposition. The identification of major genes and determination of their biochemical action to a particular jaw discrepancy is the first approach necessary for the search of a solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaffe–Campanacci Syndrome, Revisited
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE © American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Jaffe–Campanacci syndrome, revisited: detailed clinical and molecular analyses determine whether patients have neurofibromatosis type 1, coincidental manifestations, or a distinct disorder Douglas R. Stewart, MD1, Hilde Brems, PhD2,3, Alicia G. Gomes, MS, CGC4, Sarah L. Ruppert, MS, CGC5, Tom Callens, BSc4, Jennifer Williams, MS4, Kathleen Claes, PhD6, Michael B. Bober, MD, PhD7, Rachel Hachen, MD, MPH8, Leonard B. Kaban, MD, DDS9, Hua Li, PhD10, Angela Lin, MD11, Marie McDonald, MD, MBBCh12,13, Serge Melancon, MD14,15, June Ortenberg, MDCM, FRCPC14,15, Heather B. Radtke, MS, CGC16, Ignace Samson, MD17, Robert A. Saul, MD18, Joseph Shen, MD, PhD19, Elizabeth Siqveland, RN, CNP20, Tomi L. Toler, MS, CGC21, Merel van Maarle, MD, PhD22, Margaret Wallace, PhD10, Misti Williams, PhD23, Eric Legius, MD, PhD2,3 and Ludwine Messiaen, PhD4 Purpose: “Jaffe–Campanacci syndrome” describes the complex of ­diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 1. Somatic NF1 muta- multiple nonossifying fibromas of the long bones, mandibular giant tions were detected in two giant cell lesions but not in two nonos- cell lesions, and café-au-lait macules in individuals without neuro- sifying fibromas. No SPRED1 or GNAS1 (exon 8) mutations were fibromas. We sought to determine whether Jaffe–Campanacci syn- detected in the seven NF1-negative patients with Jaffe–Campanacci drome is a distinct genetic entity or a variant of neurofibromatosis syndrome, nonossifying fibromas, or giant cell lesions. type 1. Conclusion: In this study, the majority of patients with café-au-lait Methods: We performed germline NF1, SPRED1, and GNAS1 (exon macules and nonossifying fibromas or giant cell lesions harbored a 8) mutation testing on patients with Jaffe–Campanacci syndrome or pathogenic germline NF1 mutation, suggesting that many Jaffe–Cam- Jaffe–Campanacci syndrome–related features.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction and Orthognathic Surgery: a Retrospective Study Jean-Pascal Dujoncquoy1, Joël Ferri1, Gwénael Raoul1, Johannes Kleinheinz2*
    Dujoncquoy et al. Head & Face Medicine 2010, 6:27 http://www.head-face-med.com/content/6/1/27 HEAD & FACE MEDICINE RESEARCH Open Access Temporomandibular joint dysfunction and orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study Jean-Pascal Dujoncquoy1, Joël Ferri1, Gwénael Raoul1, Johannes Kleinheinz2* Abstract Background: Relations between maxillo-mandibular deformities and TMJ disorders have been the object of different studies in medical literature and there are various opinions concerning the alteration of TMJ dysfunction after orthognathic surgery. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate TMJ disorders changes before and after orthognathic surgery, and to assess the risk of creating new TMJ symptoms on asymptomatic patients. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 176 patients operated at the Maxillo-Facial Service of the Lille’s2 Universitary Hospital Center (Chairman Pr Joël Ferri) from 01.01.2006 to 01.01.2008. 57 patients (35 females and 22 males), age range from 16 to 65 years old, filled the questionnaire. The prevalence and the results on pain, sounds, clicking, joint locking, limited mouth opening, and tenseness were evaluated comparing different subgroups of patients. Results: TMJ symptoms were significantly reduced after treatment for patients with pre-operative symptoms. The overall subjective treatment outcome was: improvement for 80.0% of patients, no change for 16.4% of patients, and an increase of symptoms for 3.6% of them. Thus, most patients were very satisfied with the results. However the appearance of new onset of TMJ symptoms is common. There was no statistical difference in the prevalence of preoperative TMJ symptoms and on postoperative results in class II compared to class III patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint Genetics Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal
    Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders Panel Test code: MA4301 Is a 374 gene panel that includes assessment of non-coding variants. This panel covers the majority of the genes listed in the Nosology 2015 (PMID: 26394607) and all genes in our Malformation category that cause growth retardation, short stature or skeletal dysplasia and is therefore a powerful diagnostic tool. It is ideal for patients suspected to have a syndromic or an isolated growth disorder or a skeletal dysplasia. About Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders This panel covers a broad spectrum of diseases associated with growth retardation, short stature or skeletal dysplasia. Many of these conditions have overlapping features which can make clinical diagnosis a challenge. Genetic diagnostics is therefore the most efficient way to subtype the diseases and enable individualized treatment and management decisions. Moreover, detection of causative mutations establishes the mode of inheritance in the family which is essential for informed genetic counseling. For additional information regarding the conditions tested on this panel, please refer to the National Organization for Rare Disorders and / or GeneReviews. Availability 4 weeks Gene Set Description Genes in the Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders Panel and their clinical significance Gene Associated phenotypes Inheritance ClinVar HGMD ACAN# Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia, aggrecan type, AD/AR 20 56 Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, Kimberley
    [Show full text]