DOCSLIB.ORG

Universal Service and Postal Monopoly in Other Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Universal Service and Postal Monopoly in Other Countries Study on Universal Postal Service and the Postal Monopoly Appendix E Universal Service and Postal Monopoly in Other Countries Alex Kalevi Dieke Antonia Niederpruem James I. Campbell UNIVERSAL SERVICE AND POSTAL MONOPOLY IN OTHER COUNTRIES 2 Contents 1 Summary ................................................................................................................ 6 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 17 3 European Union .................................................................................................. 18 3.1 Introduction to postal policy in the European Union ................................... 18 3.2 Universal service policies ............................................................................. 19 3.2.1 Universal service obligation ..................................................................... 20 3.2.2 Scope of universal services ....................................................................... 20 3.2.3 Uniform tariff requirements ...................................................................... 21 3.2.4 Access requirements ................................................................................. 21 3.2.5 Delivery requirements ............................................................................... 22 3.2.6 Quality of service ...................................................................................... 22 3.3 Monopoly policies ......................................................................................... 22 3.4 Effectiveness of eliminating the legal monopoly ........................................... 23 3.4.1 Universal service provision....................................................................... 23 3.4.2 Competition............................................................................................... 24 3.4.3 Impact of market opening on universal service ........................................ 25 4 United Kingdom .................................................................................................. 27 4.1 Introduction to postal policy in the United Kingdom ................................... 27 4.2 Universal service policies ............................................................................. 28 4.2.1 Responsibility to ensure universal service ................................................ 28 4.2.2 Scope of universal services ....................................................................... 28 4.2.3 Uniform tariff requirements ...................................................................... 29 4.2.4 Access requirements ................................................................................. 29 4.2.5 Delivery requirements ............................................................................... 30 4.2.6 Quality of service ...................................................................................... 30 4.3 Monopoly policies ......................................................................................... 31 4.3.1 Termination of the postal monopoly ......................................................... 31 4.3.2 Introduction of upstream competition ....................................................... 32 4.4 Effectiveness of eliminating the legal monopoly ........................................... 33 4.4.1 Universal service provision....................................................................... 34 4.4.1.1 Access conditions.............................................................................. 34 4.4.1.2 Delivery conditions ........................................................................... 34 4.4.1.3 Quality of service .............................................................................. 35 4.4.2 Competition............................................................................................... 35 4.4.3 Tariffs ........................................................................................................ 37 4.4.4 Profitability of the public postal operator ................................................. 38 GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY NOVEMBER 2008 UNIVERSAL SERVICE AND POSTAL MONOPOLY IN OTHER COUNTRIES 3 4.4.5 Impact of market opening on universal service ........................................ 40 5 Germany .............................................................................................................. 43 5.1 Introduction to postal policy in Germany ..................................................... 43 5.2 Universal service policies ............................................................................. 44 5.2.1 Responsibility to ensure universal service ................................................ 44 5.2.2 Scope of universal services ....................................................................... 45 5.2.3 Uniform tariff requirements ...................................................................... 45 5.2.4 Access requirements ................................................................................. 46 5.2.5 Delivery requirements ............................................................................... 46 5.2.6 Quality of service ...................................................................................... 46 5.3 Monopoly policies ......................................................................................... 47 5.4 Effectiveness of eliminating the legal monopoly ........................................... 48 5.4.1 Universal service provision....................................................................... 48 5.4.1.1 Access conditions.............................................................................. 48 5.4.1.2 Delivery conditions ........................................................................... 49 5.4.1.3 Quality of service .............................................................................. 49 5.4.2 Competition............................................................................................... 49 5.4.3 Tariffs ........................................................................................................ 51 5.4.4 Profitability of the formerly public postal operator .................................. 51 5.4.5 Impact of market opening on universal service ........................................ 54 6 Sweden ................................................................................................................. 55 6.1 Introduction to postal policy in Sweden........................................................ 55 6.2 Universal service policies ............................................................................. 55 6.2.1 Responsibility to ensure universal service ................................................ 55 6.2.2 Scope of universal services ....................................................................... 56 6.2.3 Uniform tariff requirements ...................................................................... 56 6.2.4 Access requirements ................................................................................. 56 6.2.5 Delivery requirements ............................................................................... 57 6.2.6 Quality of service ...................................................................................... 57 6.3 Monopoly policies ......................................................................................... 57 6.4 Effectiveness of eliminating the legal monopoly ........................................... 58 6.4.1 Universal service provision....................................................................... 58 6.4.1.1 Access conditions.............................................................................. 58 6.4.1.2 Delivery conditions ........................................................................... 59 6.4.1.3 Quality of service .............................................................................. 59 6.4.2 Competition............................................................................................... 59 6.4.3 Tariffs ........................................................................................................ 61 6.4.4 Profitability of the public postal operator ................................................. 63 6.4.5 Impact of market opening on universal service ........................................ 65 7 The Netherlands .................................................................................................. 67 GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY NOVEMBER 2008 UNIVERSAL SERVICE AND POSTAL MONOPOLY IN OTHER COUNTRIES 4 7.1 Introduction to postal policy in the Netherlands .......................................... 67 7.2 Universal service policies ............................................................................. 68 7.2.1 Responsibility to ensure universal service ................................................ 68 7.2.2 Scope of universal services ....................................................................... 68 7.2.3 Uniform tariff requirements ...................................................................... 69 7.2.4 Access requirements ................................................................................. 69 7.2.5 Delivery requirements ............................................................................... 69 7.2.6 Quality of service .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Royal Mail Annual Report
    Royal Mail plc Royal Mail plc Annual Report and Financial Statements Royal Mail plc 2014-15 Annual Report FinancialAnnual Statements and 2014-15 Strategic report Governance Financial statements Other information Strategic report Who we are 02 Financial and operating performance highlights 04 Chairman’s statement 05 Chief Executive Officer’s review 07 Market overview 12 Our business model 14 Our strategy 16 Key performance indicators 18 UK Parcels, International & Letters (UKPIL) 21 General Logistics Systems (GLS) 23 Financial review 24 Business risks 31 Corporate Responsibility 36 Governance Chairman’s introduction to Corporate Governance 41 Board of Directors 43 Statement of Corporate Governance 47 Chief Executive’s Committee 58 Directors’ Report 60 Directors’ remuneration report 64 Financial statements Consolidated income statement 77 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 78 Consolidated statement of cash flows 79 Consolidated balance sheet 80 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 81 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 82 Significant accounting policies 131 Group five year summary (unaudited) 140 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of 142 Information key the Group financial statements Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of 143 Royal Mail plc Case studies Royal Mail plc – parent Company financial statements 146 This icon is used throughout the document to indicate Other information reporting against a key performance indicator (KPI) Shareholder information 151 Forward-looking statements 152 Annual Report and Financial Statements 2014-15 Who we are Royal Mail is the UK’s pre-eminent delivery company, connecting people, customers and businesses. As the UK’s sole designated Universal Service Provider1, we are proud to deliver a ‘one-price-goes-anywhere’ service on a range of letters and parcels to more than 29 million addresses, across the UK, six-days-a-week.
    [Show full text]
  • TNT Annual Report 2008
    Sure we can Annual report 2008 WorldReginfo - 731da950-9e55-4f32-8b5e-cc096546682d Sure we can Annual report 2008 WorldReginfo - 731da950-9e55-4f32-8b5e-cc096546682d Cautionary note with regard to Introduction and “forward-looking statements” financial highlights Some statements in this annual report are “forward-looking statements”. This is TNT’s annual report for the financial year ended 31 December 2008, By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty prepared in accordance with Dutch regulations. TNT delisted its American because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in Depositary Receipts from the New York Stock Exchange on 18 June 2007, the future. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown and its reporting obligations with the United States Securities and Exchange risks, uncertainties and other factors that are outside of TNT’s control and Commission terminated on 16 September 2007. TNT is therefore no longer impossible to predict and may cause actual results to differ materially from any required to file its annual repor t on Form 20-F. future results expressed or implied. These forward-looking statements are However, where TNT thinks it is helpful, certain information is retained for based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, analyses and projections comparative purposes. In this way TNT intends to provide its stakeholders with about the industries in which TNT operates and TNT management’s beliefs a clear overview of its financial year 2008. and assumptions about future events. Unless otherwise specified or the context so requires, “TNT”, the “company”, You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on these forward-looking the “group”, “it” and “its” refer to TNT N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019-20
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019-20 and Financial Statements Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2019-20 Royal Mail plc 1 Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019–20 CONTENTS Strategic Report Financial Statements Report Strategic 02 Overview 159 Independent auditor’s report 04 Who we are 166 Consolidated income statement 06 Financial and operational highlights 2019-20 167 Consolidated statement 15 Interim Executive Chair’s statement of comprehensive income 18 Delivering throughout the COVID-19 pandemic 168 Consolidated balance sheet 19 Business review 2019-20 170 Consolidated statement of changes in equity Corporate Governance Corporate 26 Market overview 171 Consolidated statement of cash flows 28 Business model 173 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 30 Measuring our performance 233 Significant accounting policies 32 Financial review 247 Royal Mail plc – Parent Company financial statements 62 Principal risks and uncertainties 73 Viability statement Shareholder Information Financial Statements 74 Corporate responsibility 250 Group five year summary (unaudited) 86 Non-financial information statement 252 Shareholder information 253 Forward-looking statements Corporate Governance 88 Chair’s introduction 90 Group Board of Directors 92 Executive Board – Royal Mail Information Shareholder 94 Governance structure 96 Board in action 100 Board composition and diversity 101 Reporting against the 2018 Corporate Governance Code 102 Board induction programme 103 Annual evaluation of Board performance and effectiveness 104 Engaging with our stakeholders 110 The Board’s considerations to our stakeholders during the COVID-19 pandemic 112 Employee engagement 114 Nomination Committee 117 Audit and Risk Committee 126 Corporate Responsibility Committee 128 Directors’ Remuneration Report 154 Directors’ Report 157 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 2 Strategic Report OVERVIEW ROYAL MAIL (UKPIL) Our UK business has faced significant challenges for some years.
    [Show full text]
  • ERGP Working Draft 03 10 2013
    Ref. Ares(2015)5557902 - 03/12/2015 ERGP (13) 38rev1 – Report on end-2-end competition ERGP REPORT ON END-TO-END COMPETITION AND ACCESS IN EUROPEAN POSTAL MARKETS June 2014 ERGP (13) 38rev1 – Report on end-2-end competition Introduction Background The gradual market opening and liberalisation of European postal markets entered into its final phase with the adoption of Directive 2008/6/EC in January 2013. Directive 2008/6/EC was supported by two earlier Directives which began the liberalisation of letters and parcels. These three directives can be summarised as follows: 1997 Directive: service delivery of letters and parcels below 350 grams in weight, or those costing five times less than the standard service (basic tariff) were reserved to universal service providers. 2002 Directive: the reserved area was then reduced again in two stages: in 2003 to 100 grams and three times the basic tariff, and in 2006 to 50 grams and two and a half times the public tariff for an item of correspondence. 2008 Directive: the Third Directive provided the introduction of full competition in European postal sectors and the abolition of any reserved services for universal service providers. This Directive came into force on 27 February 2008 with some exceptions for eleven Member States such as new members and those with particular geographical issues making this impractical. The speed of liberalisation varied across member states. However, by 1 January 2011, 15 member states (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) had fully liberalised their postal markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Workers November 2009.Pdf
    wWww.workers.org.Ouk RKENORVEMBER 2S 009 £1 HISTORIC NOTES 12 ALFRED THE GREAT AND THE FOUNDING OF ENGLAND MESSING WITH THE MAIL: THE EU’S HIddEN AGENdA Y T Economy The slump continues R 03 A P T S I N U M Honduras The US and the coup 10 M O C E H T F O Marxist thinking Fighting fascism 15 L A N R U O J IF YOU WANT TO REBUILD BRITAIN, READ ON WORKERS It’s class war…against the workers WITH CAPITALISM in absolute decline, the but nowhere near enough. As ever, the “ultra- ruling class is using the crisis they caused to left” assists the capitalist class. It smears as attack industry and services, our whole class. fascist, chauvinist and reactionary these vital The increasingly corporate state is destroying ideas. democracy, local government, the civil Too many of us just see and moan about service, higher education, the national what the ruling class is doing to us. Too many education service, the NHS, housing and close their eyes and hope it will go away. pensions. But there is a way forward. We can do It is class war. The ruling class knows this. something about it all. We can take What does the working class think? What is responsibility for our workplaces. We can the working class plan for dealing with this? assert that we have the skills and Is the working class embracing the necessary professionalism to make a difference, to take ‘‘ ideas of a united Britain, of workers’ control. nationalism, rebuilding industry, opposition We can no longer live with a capitalism to the free movement of labour, leaving the that is intent on destroying us.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Paper
    Page 1/5 POSITION PAPER The ECORYS Study on “Development of competition in the European postal sector” 22 March 2006 PostEurop, the Association of 43 Postal Operators, holders of the Universal Service Obligation at national as well as at international level, through its Postal Directive Working Group, has followed with attention the progress and the outcome of the Study performed by ECORYS for the European Commission (DG Markt) titled : “The development of competition in the European postal sector”1. The Study has been made public in mid-August 2005. The European Commission hosted a workshop on 10 October 2005 during which ECORYS described the main results of its study. PostEurop has already taken the opportunity to issue its opinions on the progress of the ECORYS study and refers therefore to its existing Opinion Paper of 15 June 20052. Following the invitation of the European Commission, PostEurop is pleased to have the opportunity to convey the following position observations in order to positively contribute to the further definition of Community postal policy. 1. GENERAL REMARKS At first sight the study provides a fresh view on current developments within the European postal sector as well as its (possible) future. The report’s uniqueness lies in the fact that it combines up-to- date knowledge of postal companies, their processes, the markets they serve, current and potential competitive forces, strategic options and the impact of liberalisation to draw a picture of the possible future of the European postal sector. ECORYS is considering the development of competition on the upstream markets as an indicator of the overall process of liberalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Disertacija4987.Pdf (4.540Mb)
    UNIVERZITET U NOVOM SADU FAKULTET TEHNIČKIH NAUKA Marija P. Unterberger RAZVOJ MODELA PRISTUPA POŠTANSKOJ MREŽI doktorska disertacija Novi Sad, 2016. UNIVERZITET U NOVOM SADU FAKULTET TEHNIČKIH NAUKA SAOBRAĆAJ doktorska disertacija RAZVOJ MODELA PRISTUPA POŠTANSKOJ MREŽI Mentor: Kandidat: Prof . dr Dragana Šarac mr Marija Unterberger Novi Sad, 2016. УНИВЕРЗИТЕТ У НОВОМ САДУ ФАКУЛТЕТ ТЕХНИЧКИХ НАУКА 21000 НОВИ САД, Трг Доситеја Обрадовића 6 КЉУЧНА ДОКУМЕНТАЦИЈСКА ИНФОРМАЦИЈА Редни број, РБР: Идентификациони број, ИБР: Тип документације, ТД: Monografska dokumentacija Тип записа, ТЗ: Tekstualni štampani materijal Врста рада, ВР: Doktorska disertacija Аутор, АУ: Marija Unterberger Ментор, МН: Dr Dragana Šarac, vanredni profesor Наслов рада, НР: Razvoj modela pristupa poštanskoj mreži Језик публикације, ЈП: Srpski (latinica) Језик извода, ЈИ: Srpski Земља публиковања, ЗП: Srbija Уже географско подручје, УГП: Vojvodina Година, ГО: 2016. Издавач, ИЗ: Fakultet tehničkih nauka Место и адреса, МА: Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 6 Физички опис рада, ФО: 7 poglavlja /150 strana / 116 citata / 59 tabela / 56 slika / - / 4 priloga (поглавља/страна/ тата/табела/слика/графика/прилога) Научна област, НО: Saobraćajno inženjerstvo Научна дисциплина, НД: Poštanski saobraćaj i komunikacije Pristup, poštanska mreža, imenovani poštanski operator, efikasnost, uslovi Предметна одредница / Кључне речи, ПО: pristupa, korisnici pristupa, tržište poštanskih usluga УДК Чува се, ЧУ: Biblioteka Fakulteta tehničkih nauka u Novom Sadu Важна напомена, ВН: Istraživanje
    [Show full text]
  • Main Developments in the Postal Sector (2013-2016)
    Main Developments in the Postal Sector (2013-2016) Country Fiches Study for the European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Written by Ph.D. Henrik Ballebye Okholm, partner in charge Mindaugas Cerpickis, project manager Anna Möller Boivie, project manager Martina Facino Jimmy Gårdebrink Mattias Almqvist Ph.D. Bruno Basalisco, quality assurer Marjolein Geus, legal expert Bird & Bird Jochem Apon, legal expert Bird & Bird July – 2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs GROW.E – Modernisation of the single market Unit E.2 — Public Interest Services Contact: Raphaël Goulet E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Main Developments in the Postal Sector (2013-2016) Country Fiches Study for the European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs 2018 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 ISBN number: 978-92-79-93171-0 doi: 10.2873/121483 © European Union, 2018 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Mail After Liberalisation
    House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee Royal Mail after Liberalisation Second Report of Session 2005–06 Volume I HC 570-I House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee Royal Mail after Liberalisation Second Report of Session 2005–06 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 13 December 2005 HC 570-I Published on 20 December 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Trade and Industry Committee The Trade and Industry Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Trade and Industry. Current membership Peter Luff MP (Conservative, Mid Worcestershire) (Chairman) Roger Berry MP (Labour, Kingswood) Mr Peter Bone MP (Conservative, Wellingborough) Mr Michael Clapham MP (Labour, Barnsley West and Penistone) Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas MP (Labour, Crosby) Mr Lindsay Hoyle MP (Labour, Chorley) Mr Mark Hunter MP (Liberal Democrat, Cheadle) Miss Julie Kirkbride MP (Conservative, Bromsgrove) Judy Mallaber MP (Labour, Amber Valley) Rob Marris MP (Labour, Wolverhampton South West) Mrs Maria Miller MP (Conservative, Basingstoke) Anne Moffat MP (Labour, East Lothian) Mr Mike Weir MP (Scottish National Party, Angus) Mr Anthony Wright MP (Labour, Great Yarmouth) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Association for Postal Commerce
    Association for Postal Commerce "Representing those who use or support the use of mail for Business Communication and Commerce" "You will be able to enjoy only those postal rights you believe are worth defending." 1800 Diagonal Rd., Ste 320 * Alexandria, VA 22314-2862 * Ph.: +1 703 524 0096 * Fax: +1 703 997 2414 Postal News for June 2014 June 30, 2014 Roll Call: The White House is throwing in the towel on a comprehensive immigration bill this year, after Speaker John A. Boehner told President Barack Obama last week that he will not allow a vote in the House, according to a White House official. [EdNote: In this environment, can postal reform have even a hair's breadth of a chance?] Financial: A new draft law on postal service that has established the Georgian Post monopoly is not meeting either EU regulations or general conditions of a competitive business environment, said Malkhaz Papelashvili, General Manager at Georgian Express, official representative of DHL Georgia. The company sees huge opportunity in expanding its business in complex logistic and domestic transportation during 2014. Georgia’s express industry showed only 3-4% growth during 2013. The United States Postal Service is planning to resume the rationalization of our network of mail processing facilities which began in 2012. To provide adequate time for planning and preparation, the Postal Service is providing this six-month advance notice of consolidations, for up to 82 facilities, which will begin early January 2015 and be completed by the fall mailing season. The Postal Service will provide detailed information about its network rationalization planning in the coming weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • International Postal Liberalization – Comparative Study of US and Key Countries
    Postal Universal Service Obligation (USO) International Comparison International Postal Liberalization – Comparative Study of US and Key Countries August 2008 Accenture is a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company. Combining unparalleled experience, comprehensive capabilities across all industries and business functions, and extensive research on the world's most successful companies, Accenture collaborates with clients to help them become high- performance businesses and governments. Although every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the material and the integrity of the analysis herein, Accenture accepts no liability for any actions taken on the basis of its content. Postal Universal Service Obligation (USO) international comparison International postal liberalization – comparative study of US and key countries – July 2008 Copyright © 2008 Accenture all rights reserved 2 CONTENTS Abbreviations 4 Executive summary 5 Objective and approach 9 Postal liberalization: theory 13 Postal liberalization: international experience 18 International comparison overview 32 International comparison – USO specifications 34 International comparison – liberalization upside potential 41 International comparison – USP relative exposure 44 International comparison – balance of flanking measures 49 Comparative study summary 69 Appendix A – referenced reports 75 Appendix B – notes on US position 77 Appendix C – country deep dives 85 Postal Universal Service Obligation (USO) international comparison International
    [Show full text]
  • Case M.8280 - DEUTSCHE POST DHL / UK MAIL
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case M.8280 - DEUTSCHE POST DHL / UK MAIL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 15/12/2016 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32016M8280 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 15.12.2016 C(2016) 8841final PUBLIC VERSION To the notifying party Dear Sirs, Subject: Case M.8280 – DEUTSCHE POST DHL / UK MAIL Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/20041 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area2 1. On 14 November 2016, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Deutsche Post AG, trading as Deutsche Post DHL Group (‘DPDHL’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of UK Mail Group plc and its subsidiaries (‘UK Mail’, United Kingdom) by way of a public bid.3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: for DPDHL: DPDHL is a global mail and logistics company headquartered in Germany. The group operates under two brands (Deutsche Post and DHL) and delivers services to customers in over 220 countries and territories worldwide. The postal division of DPDHL, Deutsche Post, provides the national postal service in Germany. DHL provides a comprehensive range of international express, freight transportation, e-commerce and supply chain management services. for UK Mail: United Kingdom-based courier company with a nationwide network of more than 50 sites and 2 400 vehicles.
    [Show full text]