Grao En Lingua E Literatura Inglesas the ROAD IN
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
What Killed Australian Cinema & Why Is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving?
What Killed Australian Cinema & Why is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving? A Thesis Submitted By Jacob Zvi for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne © Jacob Zvi 2019 Swinburne University of Technology All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. II Abstract In 2004, annual Australian viewership of Australian cinema, regularly averaging below 5%, reached an all-time low of 1.3%. Considering Australia ranks among the top nations in both screens and cinema attendance per capita, and that Australians’ biggest cultural consumption is screen products and multi-media equipment, suggests that Australians love cinema, but refrain from watching their own. Why? During its golden period, 1970-1988, Australian cinema was operating under combined private and government investment, and responsible for critical and commercial successes. However, over the past thirty years, 1988-2018, due to the detrimental role of government film agencies played in binding Australian cinema to government funding, Australian films are perceived as under-developed, low budget, and depressing. Out of hundreds of films produced, and investment of billions of dollars, only a dozen managed to recoup their budget. The thesis demonstrates how ‘Australian national cinema’ discourse helped funding bodies consolidate their power. Australian filmmaking is defined by three ongoing and unresolved frictions: one external and two internal. Friction I debates Australian cinema vs. Australian audience, rejecting Australian cinema’s output, resulting in Frictions II and III, which respectively debate two industry questions: what content is produced? arthouse vs. -
2011-Catalogue.Pdf
>> Le Festival existegrâceausoutiende/ Le Festival PARTENAIRES The Festival receives supportfrom receives The Festival SPONSORS 1 192 > INDEX 175 > ACTIONS VERS LES PUBLICS 179 > RENCONTRES 167 > AUTRES PROGRAMMATIONS 105 > HOMMAGES ET RÉTROSPECTIVES 19 > SELECTION OFFICIELLE 01 > LE FESTIVAL PARTENAIRES SPONSORS LE FESTIVAL >> Le Festival remercie / The Festival would like to thank Académie de Nantes • ACOR • Andégave communication • Arte • Artothèque • Atmosphères Production • Bibliothèque Universitaire d’Angers • Bureau d’Accueil des Tournages des Pays de la Loire • Capricci • Films Centre national de danse contemporaine • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire • Cinéma Parlant • CCO - Abbaye de Fontevraud • Commission Supérieure Technique • Ecole Supérieure des Beaux-Arts • Ecole Supérieure des Pays de la Loire • Ecran Total • Eden Solutions • Elacom • Esra Bretagne • Fé2A • Filminger • France 2 • France Culture • Keolis Angers Cotra • Forum des Images • Ford Rent Angers • Héliotrope • Imprimerie Setig Palussière • Inspection Académique de Maine-et-Loire • Institut municipal d’Angers • JC Decaux • La fémis • Les Films du camion • Les Vitrines d’Angers • Musées d’Angers • Nouveau Théâtre d’Angers • OPCAL • Pôle emploi Spectacle • SCEREN – CDDP de Maine-et-Loire • Tacc Kinoton • Université d’Angers • Université Catholique de l’Ouest Ambassade de France à Berlin • Ambassade de France en République tchèque • Ambassade de France en Russie • Ambassade d’Espagne à Paris • British Council • Centre culturel Français Alexandre Dumas de Tbilissi • -
The Instrument Ofchoice
The instrument of choice. As an editor at the keys, you need a system that helps make every session a fine performance: The Grass ValleyGroup Editing System. Designed to take the best from your production system to the screen. Built to grow as you grow. So if you demand an instrument with capabilities equal to your own, there's only one choice: The Grass Valley Group Editing System. Grass Valley Grou-@ ~'r'V""t'\lAt)"'l..IV \,IIJIIiI From the Editor used to be common agreement that twO things were certain for everyone _ death and taxes. Now you can't be certain IChange.of WHICHMy dictionarytaxes. rambles for approximately 700 words explaining what you can do with that single word, "change." you can run dailies late at night with a director, or habits can change, and the director can take a video cassette home for relaxed viewing after a 12 hour day. For easier viewing some editors are changing from the use of an 8 plate Kem to the use of tWO4 plate models interlocked together. A f¡\m editor works in a cutting room, but when the editing on the sarne show is changed to video tape, he or she is then working in an editing bay. Change is obvious in some (hings, such as more dialogue TV series going to video tape editing. Some change is not so obvious, such s as the faster delivery of difficult film optical because computer camera controls can prograrn so many things with the sarne pass throughIf RiptheVanopticalWinklecamera.had been an editor before his "big sleep," one drowsy glance at a 1986cutting schedulewould snap him awake. -
NEWS- CONTACT: Leslie Unger - (310) 247-3000 November 3, 1998 [email protected] OSCAR CA.M.P.A .S.Iii for IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ACADEMY OF MOTION PICTURE ARTS AND SCIENCES 8949 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD· BEVERLY HILLS. CALIFORNIA 90211 • (310) 247-3000 - NEWS- CONTACT: Leslie Unger - (310) 247-3000 November 3, 1998 [email protected] OSCAR CA.M.P.A .S.iII FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ACADEMY SEMINAR ON FILM EDITING KICKS OFF TOMORROW BEVERLY HILLS, CA - "Conversations with Film Editors," a four week seminar addressing the art and challenges of film editing will begin today (11/4), at 7 p.m., at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Subsequent sessions will be held on November 11 and 18 and December 2. "This is yet another of the Academy's great multi-week seminars that will bring top-caliber professionals into a setting where they can share their personal perspectives on their art," said Academy President Robert Rehrne. "What I think is so important and unique about these seminars is that they don't focus on the 'how to' questions so much as on the 'why' issues of the craft." Donn Cambern, Academy Vice President and editor of such films as EASY RIDER (1969), ROMANCING THE STONE (1985) and A THOUSAND ACRES (1998) will lead the discussions in each of the four meetings. Also scheduled to participate are Mark Goldblatt (ST A RSHIP TROOPERS, TRUE LIES, TERMINATOR 2: JUDGMENT DAY), Michael Kahn (SAVING PRIVATE RYAN, SCHINDLER'S LIST, RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK), Carol Littleton (BELOVED, THE ACCIDENTAL TOURIST, E. T. THE EXTRA-TERRESTRIAL) and Torn Rolf (THE HORSE WHISPERER, DANGEROUS MINDS, THE RIGHT STUFF). Registration for the "Conversations with Film Editors" series is $80 for the general public; $60 for Academy members and students with valid identification. -
Theory and Interpretation of Narrative) Includes Bibliographical References and Index
Theory and In T e r p r e Tati o n o f n a r r ati v e James Phelan and Peter J. rabinowitz, series editors Postclassical Narratology Approaches and Analyses edited by JaN alber aNd MoNika FluderNik T h e O h i O S T a T e U n i v e r S i T y P r e ss / C O l U m b us Copyright © 2010 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Postclassical narratology : approaches and analyses / edited by Jan Alber and Monika Fludernik. p. cm. — (Theory and interpretation of narrative) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8142-5175-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8142-5175-7 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-8142-1142-7 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8142-1142-9 (cloth : alk. paper) [etc.] 1. Narration (Rhetoric) I. Alber, Jan, 1973– II. Fludernik, Monika. III. Series: Theory and interpretation of narrative series. PN212.P67 2010 808—dc22 2010009305 This book is available in the following editions: Cloth (ISBN 978-0-8142-1142-7) Paper (ISBN 978-0-8142-5175-1) CD-ROM (ISBN 978-0-8142-9241-9) Cover design by Laurence J. Nozik Type set in Adobe Sabon Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction Jan alber and monika Fludernik 1 Part i. -
Hofstra University Film Library Holdings
Hofstra University Film Library Holdings TITLE PUBLICATION INFORMATION NUMBER DATE LANG 1-800-INDIA Mitra Films and Thirteen/WNET New York producer, Anna Cater director, Safina Uberoi. VD-1181 c2006. eng 1 giant leap Palm Pictures. VD-825 2001 und 1 on 1 V-5489 c2002. eng 3 films by Louis Malle Nouvelles Editions de Films written and directed by Louis Malle. VD-1340 2006 fre produced by Argosy Pictures Corporation, a Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer picture [presented by] 3 godfathers John Ford and Merian C. Cooper produced by John Ford and Merian C. Cooper screenplay VD-1348 [2006] eng by Laurence Stallings and Frank S. Nugent directed by John Ford. Lions Gate Films, Inc. producer, Robert Altman writer, Robert Altman director, Robert 3 women VD-1333 [2004] eng Altman. Filmocom Productions with participation of the Russian Federation Ministry of Culture and financial support of the Hubert Balls Fund of the International Filmfestival Rotterdam 4 VD-1704 2006 rus produced by Yelena Yatsura concept and story by Vladimir Sorokin, Ilya Khrzhanovsky screenplay by Vladimir Sorokin directed by Ilya Khrzhanovsky. a film by Kartemquin Educational Films CPB producer/director, Maria Finitzo co- 5 girls V-5767 2001 eng producer/editor, David E. Simpson. / una produzione Cineriz ideato e dirètto da Federico Fellini prodotto da Angelo Rizzoli 8 1/2 soggètto, Federico Fellini, Ennio Flaiano scenegiatura, Federico Fellini, Tullio Pinelli, Ennio V-554 c1987. ita Flaiano, Brunello Rondi. / una produzione Cineriz ideato e dirètto da Federico Fellini prodotto da Angelo Rizzoli 8 1/2 soggètto, Federico Fellini, Ennio Flaiano scenegiatura, Federico Fellini, Tullio Pinelli, Ennio V-554 c1987. -
Downloaded on 2017-02-12T05:50:30Z !
Title Corporeal prisons: dynamics of body and mise-en-scène in three films by Paul Schrader Author(s) Murphy, Ian Publication date 2015 Original citation Murphy, I. 2015. Corporeal prisons: dynamics of body and mise-en- scène in three films by Paul Schrader. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Rights © 2015, Ian Murphy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Embargo information No embargo required Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2086 from Downloaded on 2017-02-12T05:50:30Z ! Corporeal Prisons: Dynamics of Body and Mise-en-Scène in Three Films by Paul Schrader ! ! ! ! Dissertation submitted in candidacy for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the School of English, College of Arts, Celtic Studies and Social Sciences, National University of Ireland, Cork By Ian Murphy Under the Supervision of Doctor Gwenda Young Head of School: Professor Claire Connolly January 2015 Table of Contents Declaration 3 Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 INTRODUCTION 6 CHAPTER ONE Man in a Room: Male Anxiety and Mise-en-Scène in American Gigolo (1980) 26 CHAPTER TWO Beauty in the Beast: The Monstrous-Feminine and Masculine Projection in Cat People (1982) 88 CHAPTER THREE The Closed Crystal: Autoerotic Desire and the Prison of Narcissism in Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters (1985) 145 CONCLUSION 209 WORKS CITED 217 ! 2! Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work and it has not been submitted for another degree, either at University College Cork or elsewhere. ___________________________________________ Ian Murphy ! 3! Abstract This thesis focuses on the complex relationship between representations of the human body and the formal processes of mise-en-scène in three consecutive films by the writer-director Paul Schrader: American Gigolo (1980), Cat People (1982) and Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters (1985). -
1 Authorship and the Films of David Lynch
1 Authorship and the Films of David Lynch: Aesthetic Receptions in Contemporary Hollywood. Antony Todd. London, New York: I.B. Tauris, 2012 (224 pages). ISBN: 9781848855809. A Review by Deborah Mellamphy, University College Cork The death of Andrew Sarris in 2012 resurrected debates surrounding the importance and role of authorship in contemporary film theory and, despite the growth of industry studies and the dominance of poststructuralism and postmodern theory in recent years, the popularity of auteur studies continues to grow. The inherent reductionism of the auteur approach has justifiably led to the rejection of the strictly romantic ideal of the author genius and a revision of the auteur’s image and role, yet the auteur continues to be relevant within contemporary film production and culture. Recent studies including Lucy Fischer’s Body Double: The Author Incarnate in the Cinema (2012), Arved Ashby’s Popular Music and the New Auteur: Visionary Filmmakers After MTV (2013), and Cecilia Sayad’s Performing Authorship: Self- Inscription and Corporeality in the Cinema (2013) illustrate the continuing scholarly significance of auteur debates within contemporary cinema and media. Discussions on David Lynch as auteur are not new. Since the release of Eraserhead (1976), scholars have considered his highly idiosyncratic cinema in terms of auteur theories. Erica Sheen and Annette Davison’s The Cinema of David Lynch: American Dreams, Nightmare Visions (2004), Todd McGowan’s The Impossible David Lynch (2007), and Justus Nieland’s David Lynch (2012) have all focused on the director’s personal vision. Antony Todd locates his study, Authorship and the Films of David Lynch: Aesthetic Receptions in Contemporary Hollywood, within a paradigm that acknowledges the limitations of the romanticised view both of the auteur, and of Lynch, whilst simultaneously acknowledging the importance of the figure. -
Comment Hollywood Figure L'intériorité Dans Les Films
Comment Hollywood figure l’intériorité dans les films “ hollywoodiens ” de David Lynch, Lost Highway (1997), Mulholland Drive (2001) et Inland Empire (2006) David Roche To cite this version: David Roche. Comment Hollywood figure l’intériorité dans les films “ hollywoodiens ” de David Lynch, Lost Highway (1997), Mulholland Drive (2001) et Inland Empire (2006). 2010. hal-00504083 HAL Id: hal-00504083 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00504083 Preprint submitted on 19 Jul 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Comment Hollywood figure l’intériorité dans les films « hollywoodiens » de David Lynch, Lost Highway (1997), Mulholland Drive (2001) et Inland Empire (2006)1 David Roche, Université de Bourgogne Si certains voient en Inland Empire un retour au cinéma expérimental de Eraserhead (1976) (Aubron : 12 ; Orr : 38), le dernier film de Lynch s’inscrit clairement, de l’aveu du cinéaste, dans la continuité de Mulholland Dr. (Aubron : 12). Les films de Lynch que l’on pourrait qualifier de hollywoodiens, à savoir les commandes produites par des maisons de production hollywoodiennes — Elephant Man (1980) par Brooks Films, Dune (1984) par De Laurentis —, ne traitent pas de Hollywood et ne se déroulent pas aux Etats-Unis, tandis que les films suivants — Blue Velvet (1986), Wild at Heart (1990) et Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (1992) — se concentrent sur le middle America. -
Easy Rider (Buscando Mi Destino) Dennis Hopper (1969)
GG GUÍAS PVY PARA VER Y A ANALIZAR Easy Rider (Buscando mi destino) Dennis Hopper (1969) * * * * * Sandra Martínez Antonio Sanjuán Colección “Guías para ver y analizar” nº 71 Directores: Javier Marzal Felici Catedrático de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Universitat Jaume I. Salvador Rubio Marco Profesor titular de Estética y Teoría de las Artes. Universidad de Murcia. Comité Científico: Josep Maria Català Domènech Catedrático de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. José Luis Castro de Paz Catedrático de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. José Manuel Palacio Arranz Catedrático de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Universidad Carlos III. Eduardo Rodríguez Merchán Catedrático de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. In memoriam Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Santos Zunzunegui Díez Catedrático de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Universidad del País Vasco. Coordinadora técnica: Concha Roncal Sánchez Editora de Nau Llibres Comité Editorial: Rafael Cherta Puig Profesor de Lengua y Literatura y Comunicación Audiovisual. IES Henri Matisse Paterna. Juan Miguel Company Ramón Catedrático de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Universitat de València. Shaila García Catalán Profesora Contratada Doctora de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Universitat Jaume I. Francisco Javier Gómez Tarín Profesor titular de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Universitat Jaume I Marta Martín Núñez Profesora Contratada Doctora de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Universitat Jaume I José María Monzó García Crítico y ensayista de cine. Aarón Rodríguez Serrano Profesor Ayudante Doctor de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Universitat Jaume I. Agustín Rubio Alcover Profesor Contratado Doctor de Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad. Universitat Jaume I. © Sandra Martínez y Antonio Sanjuán © De esta edición: Nau Llibres. Periodista Badía 10. -
Open Editfest Program
20:21 EDITING E M a tt Marjorie Bruce Fran Make a big production less of a production. “Productions is the fi nal puzzle piece for making Premiere Pro an undeniable choice for any scale movie. Th e ability to share projects and organize media across them, combined with Premiere’s existing dynamic workfl ows, lets our entire team work and collaborate incredibly fast.” —Ben Insler, First Assistant Editor, MANK © 2021 Adobe. All rights reserved. Adobe, the Adobe logo, and Adobe Premiere are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe in the United States and/or other countries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Creativity for all. TABLE CONTENTS E :05 Welcome :06 Itinerary :12 Sponsors :14 ACE President Kevin Tent, ACE :15 SATURDAY | PANEL 1 Editing for Musicals :23 SATURDAY | PANEL 2 Inside the Cutting Room with Bobbie O’Steen A Conversation with Tom Cross, ACE :27 Saturday Breakout Room Speakers :39 SUNDAY | PANEL 1 From Assistant to Editor Mentoring the Next Generation :51 SUNDAY | PANEL 2 International Partnership Program Launch Strengthening the Art of Editing in the Global Film Community :59 Sunday Breakout Room Speakers :71 Production Credits :72 ACE Member Roster :80 EditFestGlobal.com :03 WELCOME EDITFEST 2021 The American Cinema Editors is an honorary society founded in 1950 by editors who wanted to create a forum to honor their profession. There were 108 editors at that first meeting. Today we number over 1,000 members, from all over the world and, like those who came before us, we wish to educate others about our craft, and our dedication to advancing the art and dignity of the editing profession. -
Reappraising the Renaissance
Reappraising the Renaissance The New Hollywood in Industrial and Critical Context Nicholas Godfrey Bachelor of Arts (Honours) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2014 Department of Screen and Media School of Humanities and Creative Arts Flinders University South Australia i ii Contents Introduction… 1 The New Hollywood that Couldn’t… 1 Aims and Context: Which New Hollywood?... 8 Chapter One: Easy Rider… 22 Chapter Two: Variations on a Theme - Five Easy Riders… 54 Part I: Five Easy Pieces... 56 Part II: Two-Lane Blacktop… 79 Part III: Vanishing Point… 126 Part IV: Little Fauss and Big Halsy… 149 Part V: Adam at 6 A.M…. 162 Chapter Three: Politicising Genre… 175 Part I: Dirty Harry… 179 Part II: The French Connection… 202 Chapter Four: The Limits of Auteurism… 222 Part I: The Last Movie… 222 Part II: The Hired Hand… 254 Conclusion… 278 Bibliography and Filmography… 293 iii iv Thesis Abstract This thesis offers a reappraisal of the “New Hollywood” of the late 1960s and early 1970s that aims to move beyond the currently accepted reductive historical models. It challenges many of the assumptions underlying prevailing accounts of the period, including the makeup of the orthodox “canon” of New Hollywood movies, the time frame within which the movies were contained, and the role played by the critical establishment in determining the ways in which the movies of the period were understood. Bringing together industrial context, textual analysis and critical (re)interpretation, it examines the complex interplay of factors that allowed a movie such as Easy Rider to achieve commercial and canonical success, while so many of its contemporaries and imitators failed to make an impact, either at the box office or within the annals of film history.