DOCSLIB.ORG

Part Iii. Environmental Resources Impacts Question 12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Part Iii. Environmental Resources Impacts Question 12 PART III. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES IMPACTS QUESTION 12 - VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL( 9); POLICY ( 7) GOAL (10); POLICIES ( 1),( 3),( 4),( 6) GOAL (16); POLICY ( 2) A. Identify the dominant species and other unusual or unique features of the plant communities on Map F. Identify and describe the amount of all plant communities that will be preserved in a natural state following development as shown on Map H. The land use types and vegetative communities within the boundaries of the site were reviewed in the field and classified utilizing the FLUCCS, Level III (FDOT, January 1999) (Map F). The boundaries of all wetlands and surface waters on the site were delineated in accordance with SWFWMD Chapter 62-340, F.A.C., and the ACOE pursuant to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Manual) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plan Region (Version 2.0) (November 2010). The SWFWMD or ACOE have not reviewed the wetland delineations in the field. Map F2 depicts the approximate locations of all wetlands/surface waters and the vegetative cover and community types for all wetlands, surface waters and uplands within the project boundaries. The site currently supports seven different land use types/vegetative communities within its boundaries. There were no unusual or unique vegetative communities on the site. The following provides brief descriptions for each of the land use types/vegetative communities identified within the subject property boundaries: Uplands Cropland and Pastureland (210): The pastures were dominated by bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) with scattered occurrences of live oak (Quercus virginiana), American beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), grape vine (Vitis sp.), winged sumac 21 (Rhus copallinum), blackberry (Rubus sp.), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), cudweed (Pseudognaphalium sp.), Carolina cranesbill (Geranium carolinianum), yucca (Yucca sp.), pricklypear (Opuntia humifusa), and tropical soda apple (Solanum viarum). There was also evidence of remnant crops of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Hardwood-Coniferous Mixed (434): The canopy and subcanopy taxa consisted of live oak, laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), water oak (Quercus nigra), longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), slash pine (Pinus elliottii), sand live oak (Quercus geminata), cabbage palm, turkey oak (Quercus laevis), scrub oak (Quercus inopina), and common persimmon (Diospyros virginiana). Herbaceous and shrub taxa included saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), blueberry (Vaccinium sp.), greenbrier (Smilax sp.), grape vine, American beautyberry, pawpaw (Asimina sp.), blackberry, bahiagrass, cudweed, Canada toadflax (Linaria canadensis), tropical soda apple, pawpaw (Asimina sp.) bluestem (Andropogon sp.), gallberry (Ilex glabra), staggerbush (Lyonia sp.), tarflower (Bejaria racemosa), blackroot (Pterocaulon pycnostachyum), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), elephantsfoot (Elephantopus sp.), common persimmon, and cottonweed (Froelichia floridana). Utilities (830): Vegetation was similar to the cropland and pastureland (210) with evidence of prior peanut crops. Wetlands and Surface Waters Reservoirs less than 10 acres (4 hectares) which are dominant features (534): Both surface water features were heavily used by cattle and contained no vegetation within the interior of the ponds. Surface water 2 located in the northwest corner of the site exhibited bahiagrass around the perimeter of the pond. Freshwater Marsh (641): Most of these areas were utilized by cattle and vegetation was disturbed. Species included duckweed (Lemna sp.), manyflower marshpennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata), dotted smartweed (Polygonum punctatum), dock (Rumex sp.), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), common buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), southern watergrass (Luziola fluitans), spikerush (Eleocharis sp.), false reinorchid (Habenaria sp.), threadleaf arrowhead (Sagittaria filiformis), water spangles (Salvinia minima), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata), water-hyacinth (Eichhornia sp.), watershield (Brasenia schreberi), floating marshpennywort (Hydrocotyle ranunculoides), soft rush (Juncus effusus), and blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica var. sylvatica). Wet Prairie (643): Most of these areas were heavily utilized by cattle. Evidence of mowing in and around the systems was observed. Species included manyflower marshpennywort, dotted 22 smartweed, mild waterpepper (Polygonum hydropiperoides), mock bishopsweed (Ptilimnium capillaceum), southern watergrass, alligatorweed (Alternanthera philoxeroides), flatsedge (Cyperus sp.), creeping primrosewillow (Ludwigia repens), bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), tropical soda apple, Nuttall’s thistle (Cirsium nuttallii), dogfennel, and cudweed. The edges of some of the systems contained live oak, sweetgum, cabbage palm, crabgrass (Digitaria sp.), and dead oaks in the weatland interior. The majority of the site is in improved pasture or row crops with lesser components of upland forests. The site will be mass-graded. Therefore, none of the existing land uses or vegetative communities will remain except for approximately eight acres around the existing bald eagle nest and approximately seven acres of wetlands. B. Discuss what survey methods were used to determine the absence or presence of state or federally listed wildlife and plants. (Sampling methodology should be agreed to by the regional planning council and other reviewing agencies at pre- application conference stage.) State actual sampling times and dates and discuss any factors that may have influenced the results of the sampling effort. Show on Map G the location of all transects, trap grids, or other sampling stations used to determine the on-site status of state or federally listed wildlife and plant resources. Prior to on-site reconnaissance, a list of state and federally listed fish, wildlife, and plants reported to occur in Marion County, Florida, was prepared along with a brief description of the preferred habitat for these species. Identification of vegetative cover types and wildlife surveys on the site were conducted during April 2016 and June 2016 to determine the occurrence or likelihood of occurrence for listed (protected) species. Species listed for protection under provisions of the ESA of 1973, 16 United States Code 1531- 1544, December 28, 1973, as amended 1976-1982, 1984, and 1988 and Florida rule [68A-27.0001 – 27.007, F.A.C. and reported to occur within Marion County, Florida, are represented in Table 12.1 . (Note: The FWC adopted new rules for listing imperiled fish and wildlife species effective on November 15, 2010 and amended October 9, 2013. Species previously classified by FWC as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Species of Special Concern (SSC) were approved for reclassification as Federally Endangered (FE), Federally Threatened (FT), State-designated Threatened (ST), or as SSC, a temporary category of protection for those species that needed additional data in order for FWC to determine whether they should be listed as ST or removed from the Florida list. Based on the regulatory changes to Chapter 68A-27 in 2010, FWC officially adopted the imperiled species management system and initiated preparation of the Draft Imperiled Species Management Plan (ISMP). The Draft ISMP is a strategic, comprehensive plan designed to conserve 57 fish and wildlife species over the next 10 years. The Draft ISMP includes supporting Draft Species Action Plans (SAPs) addressing individual species needs and Integrated 23 Conservation Strategies for multiple species and their shared habitats. The final Draft ISMP and SAPs were adopted by the FWC on November 16, 2016. The final adopted ISMP and SAPs have been incorporated herein. The likelihood of occurrence, listed within this table, is based on a comparison of known general habitat requirements of these species with the habitats found on or near the site, the quantity, quality, and adjacency of these habitats, as well as any observations or sign of these species during the field review. The likelihood of occurrence for listed species was rated as high, moderate, low, unlikely, or not applicable based on knowledge of a species’ habitat preference and site conditions. A likelihood of occurrence given as “unlikely” indicates that no, or very limited, suitable habitat for this species exists on the site, but the site is within the documented range of the species; “not applicable” indicates that the habitat for this species does not exist on or adjacent to the site and/or the site is not within the documented range of the species. Scientists conducted a 15% vehicular and pedestrian survey within all the habitat types on the site (Map G). A total of 63 transects were conducted over a five-day period (April 6, 7, 12, 19, and June 30, 2016). All state or federally listed fish or wildlife species observed (including sign) were documented. In addition, based on prior observations by scientists of a Florida scrub-jay adjacent to the site, a formal Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) survey in accordance with the USFWS 2007 survey protocol was conducted on the site (see Map G2). C. List all state or federally listed wildlife and plant resources that were observed on the site and show location on Map G. Given the plant communities on-site, list any additional state or federally listed wildlife and plant resources expected to occur
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Approved Plant List 10/04/12
    FLORIDA The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time to plant a tree is today. City of Sunrise Approved Plant List 10/04/12 Appendix A 10/4/12 APPROVED PLANT LIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SG xx Slow Growing “xx” = minimum height in Small Mature tree height of less than 20 feet at time of planting feet OH Trees adjacent to overhead power lines Medium Mature tree height of between 21 – 40 feet U Trees within Utility Easements Large Mature tree height greater than 41 N Not acceptable for use as a replacement feet * Native Florida Species Varies Mature tree height depends on variety Mature size information based on Betrock’s Florida Landscape Plants Published 2001 GROUP “A” TREES Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Avocado Persea Americana L Bahama Strongbark Bourreria orata * U, SG 6 S Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum * L Black Olive Shady Bucida buceras ‘Shady Lady’ L Lady Black Olive Bucida buceras L Brazil Beautyleaf Calophyllum brasiliense L Blolly Guapira discolor* M Bridalveil Tree Caesalpinia granadillo M Bulnesia Bulnesia arboria M Cinnecord Acacia choriophylla * U, SG 6 S Group ‘A’ Plant List for Single Family Homes Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Citrus: Lemon, Citrus spp. OH S (except orange, Lime ect. Grapefruit) Citrus: Grapefruit Citrus paradisi M Trees Copperpod Peltophorum pterocarpum L Fiddlewood Citharexylum fruticosum * U, SG 8 S Floss Silk Tree Chorisia speciosa L Golden – Shower Cassia fistula L Green Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus * L Gumbo Limbo Bursera simaruba * L
    [Show full text]
  • Oaks (Quercus Spp.): a Brief History
    Publication WSFNR-20-25A April 2020 Oaks (Quercus spp.): A Brief History Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care / University Hill Fellow University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources Quercus (oak) is the largest tree genus in temperate and sub-tropical areas of the Northern Hemisphere with an extensive distribution. (Denk et.al. 2010) Oaks are the most dominant trees of North America both in species number and biomass. (Hipp et.al. 2018) The three North America oak groups (white, red / black, and golden-cup) represent roughly 60% (~255) of the ~435 species within the Quercus genus worldwide. (Hipp et.al. 2018; McVay et.al. 2017a) Oak group development over time helped determine current species, and can suggest relationships which foster hybridization. The red / black and white oaks developed during a warm phase in global climate at high latitudes in what today is the boreal forest zone. From this northern location, both oak groups spread together southward across the continent splitting into a large eastern United States pathway, and much smaller western and far western paths. Both species groups spread into the eastern United States, then southward, and continued into Mexico and Central America as far as Columbia. (Hipp et.al. 2018) Today, Mexico is considered the world center of oak diversity. (Hipp et.al. 2018) Figure 1 shows genus, sub-genus and sections of Quercus (oak). History of Oak Species Groups Oaks developed under much different climates and environments than today. By examining how oaks developed and diversified into small, closely related groups, the native set of Georgia oak species can be better appreciated and understood in how they are related, share gene sets, or hybridize.
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus Laevis Walt. Turkey Oak Fagaceae Beech Family Richard F
    Quercus laevis Walt. Turkey Oak Fagaceae Beech family Richard F. Harlow Turkey oak (Quercus Zaeuis), also called Catesby Habitat oak or scrub oak, is a small, moderately fast to fast- growing tree found on dry sandy soils of ridges, Native Range pinelands, and dunes, often in pure stands. This oak is not commercially important because of its size, but Turkey oak (figs. 1, 2) is limited to the dry the hard, close-grained wood is an excellent fuel. The pinelands and sandy ridges of the southeastern Coas- acorns are an important food to wildlife. Turkey oak tal Plain from southeast Virginia to central Florida is so named for its 3-lobed leaves which resemble a and west to southeast Louisiana (14). It reaches its turkey’s foot. maximum development in a subtropical climate. This Figure l-The native range of turkey oak. The author is Research Wildlife Biologist (retired), Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC. 672 Quercus laevis in organic matter, and are strongly acid. Depth to water table is more than 152 cm (60 in) (18,211. Associated Forest Cover Turkey oak is commonly associated with longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), bluejack oak (Quercus in- cana), and sand (dwarf) post oak (Q. stellata var. margaretta). Depending on location it can also be associated with sand pine (Pinus clausa), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), southern red oak (Q. falcata), live oak (Q. virginiana), blackjack oak (Q. marilan- dica), sand hickory (Carya pallida), mockernut hick- ory (C. tomentosa), and black cherry (Prunus serotina). Understory, depending on the part of the range con- sidered, can include sassafras (Sassafras albidum), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), pawpaw (Asimina spp.), dwarf huckleberry, deerberry, and tree sparkle- berry (Vaccinium spp.), New Jersey tea (Ceanothus americanus), gopher-apple (Geobalanus oblongifolius), blackberry (Rubus spp.), crooked wood (Lyonia spp.), scrub hickory (Carya fZoridana), myrtle oak (Quercus myrtifolia), Chapman oak (Q.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Oaks to Wildlife1
    Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. WEC248 The Value of Oaks to Wildlife1 Holly K. Ober2 Trees provide essential habitat features for birds, nothing but the leaves of oaks. Many predatory mammals, amphibians, reptiles, and insects. spiders take advantage of the diversity of insects Resources provided by trees include food, shelter attracted to oak leaves by residing in these trees and from the sun and rain, and places to hide, nest, and feeding on these other insects. Some birds use a roost. As a group, oak species are among the most similar tactic, visiting clumps of Spanish moss on the useful hardwood trees to many species of animals. branches of live oak trees to feed on the many insects that live in the clumps of moss. Other species of birds Oaks are relatively long-lived, slow-growing will search the surface of branches and leaf clusters trees. They vary widely in size and form, with some for insects. species never growing in stature beyond a short shrub and others developing into large trees with such Undoubtedly the most valuable resource oaks extensive crowns that they are wider than they are provide for vertebrate wildlife is acorns. Acorns are tall. Florida is home to 24 species of native oaks that one of the most important food items in the diets of a grow in a variety of conditions, from very dry sandy wide variety of animals (figure 1). More than 100 uplands to periodically flooded bottomland forests. species of vertebrate animals are known to consume acorns in the U.S., including mammals such as Oaks Provide Food for Wildlife white-tailed deer, gray squirrels, fox squirrels, flying squirrels, mice, voles, rabbits, raccoons, opossums, The leaves, twigs, and young shoots of oaks gray foxes, red foxes, and wild hogs.
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Ecoregion Terrestrial Habitats
    Piedmont Ecoregion Terrestrial Habitats Description and Location The Piedmont Ecoregion occupies an area between the Southern Blue Ridge Escarpment and the Sandhills Ecoregion. The northwestern boundary is generally considered to be the base of the Blue Ridge Escarpment; the division between the crystalline rocks of the piedmont and the sedimentary rocks of the sandhills represents the southeastern boundary of this ecoregion. The piedmont-sandhill contact zone is marked in many river channels by shoals and rock ledges that collectively form the fall line. Gently rolling hills with many stream-cut valleys characterize the region with only a few level floodplains. In the lower piedmont, there are relatively few sharp breaks in topography except along major river valleys. Habitats and Priority Species The rolling uplands of the piedmont landscape are predominantly a mosaic of agricultural land and managed woodland, with a history of clearing and economic use that dates back to the earliest times of European settlement. Hardwood-dominated forests occupy relatively narrow floodplains and scattered upland sites, while pine and pine-hardwood forests occupy the majority of forested upland sites. The resulting landscape does not constitute suitable habitat for many area-sensitive wildlife species or for species associated with either early-successional or late- successional conditions. Most of the priority species considered in the CWCS that occur in the piedmont fall into one or more of these categories. Oak-hickory Forest General Description and Location Occurring throughout the state but most characteristic of rolling uplands in the piedmont, oak- hickory forest is a widely distributed community that varies from site to site.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks
    Article An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks (Quercus Subgenus Quercus): Review of the Contribution of Phylogenomic Data to Biogeography and Species Diversity Paul S. Manos 1,* and Andrew L. Hipp 2 1 Department of Biology, Duke University, 330 Bio Sci Bldg, Durham, NC 27708, USA 2 The Morton Arboretum, Center for Tree Science, 4100 Illinois 53, Lisle, IL 60532, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The oak flora of North America north of Mexico is both phylogenetically diverse and species-rich, including 92 species placed in five sections of subgenus Quercus, the oak clade centered on the Americas. Despite phylogenetic and taxonomic progress on the genus over the past 45 years, classification of species at the subsectional level remains unchanged since the early treatments by WL Trelease, AA Camus, and CH Muller. In recent work, we used a RAD-seq based phylogeny including 250 species sampled from throughout the Americas and Eurasia to reconstruct the timing and biogeography of the North American oak radiation. This work demonstrates that the North American oak flora comprises mostly regional species radiations with limited phylogenetic affinities to Mexican clades, and two sister group connections to Eurasia. Using this framework, we describe the regional patterns of oak diversity within North America and formally classify 62 species into nine major North American subsections within sections Lobatae (the red oaks) and Quercus (the Citation: Manos, P.S.; Hipp, A.L. An Quercus Updated Infrageneric Classification white oaks), the two largest sections of subgenus . We also distill emerging evolutionary and of the North American Oaks (Quercus biogeographic patterns based on the impact of phylogenomic data on the systematics of multiple Subgenus Quercus): Review of the species complexes and instances of hybridization.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Woody Wetland Vegetation Communities Along Gum Slough
    VEGETATION APPENDIX Characterization of Woody Wetland Vegetation Communities along Gum Slough Submitted to: Southwest Florida Water Management District Submitted by: 4030 Boy Scout Boulevard Tampa, Florida 33607 August 2010 Executive Summary The purpose of this study was to characterize relationships among vegetation, soils, and elevations in wetlands along Gum Slough, in Sumter County, Florida, and assist the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) in establishing minimum flows and levels (MFLs) for the river. Vegetation classes, plant species importance, soil characteristics, and elevations were characterized along 8 transects within the upper reaches of Gum Slough. The study corridor extended 1.6 miles downstream from Transect PHABSIM1 and the slough flows 3.5 miles farther downstream to its confluence with the Withlacoochee River. Vegetation. The permanent ground water flows and clear water of the spring-fed Gum Slough differentiate it from streams and rivers dominated by surface water flows. Unlike many coastal springs rivers, such as the Homosassa and Crystal rivers, Gum Slough has a well-developed floodplain characterized by extensive seasonally and sometimes semipermanently inundated swamps. The floodplain vegetation associated with Gum Slough is similar to vegetation described for parts of the Withlacoochee River floodplain (SWFWMD 1997). Differences in vegetation classes along Gum Slough study corridor were measured using importance values (IVs) that were calculated using tree species density and basal area and subsequently provided a relative measure of species dominance (no units). Differences in species and species importance were significant between the 6 vegetation classes identified along Gum Slough (Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, p < 0.01). Six vegetation classes were characterized as wetland classes and a single upland class was identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Stem, Branch, and Root Wood Anatomy of Black Oak (Quercus Velutina Lam) Douglas D
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1986 Stem, branch, and root wood anatomy of black oak (Quercus velutina Lam) Douglas D. Stokke Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Wood Science and Pulp, Paper Technology Commons Recommended Citation Stokke, Douglas D., "Stem, branch, and root wood anatomy of black oak (Quercus velutina Lam) " (1986). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 8312. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8312 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. For example: • Manuscript pages may have indistinct print. In such cases, the best available copy has been filmed. • Manuscripts may not always be complete. In such cases, a note will indicate that it is not possible to obtain missing pages. • Copyrighted material may have been removed from the manuscript. In such cases, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant List
    BRIGHTLEAF AT THE PARK ASSOCIATION, INC. ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE PPM INC. 6739 FALLS OF NEUSE RD. RALEIGH, NC 27615 SUBJECT: LIST OF RECOMMENDED PLANT SPECIES Large Maturing Trees Botanical Name Common Name Acer rubrum Red Maple Acer saccharum Sugar Maple Betula nigra River Birch Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam Carya ovata Shagbark Hickory Fagus grandifolia American Beech Fraxinus americana White Ash Fraxinus pennsylvatica Green Ash Ginkgo biloba Ginkgo Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum Platanus acerifolia London Planetree Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Quercus alba White Oak Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak Quercus laurifolia Laurel Oak Quercus palustris Pin Oak Quercus phellos Willow Oak Quercus shumardi Shumard Oak Taxodium distichum Baldcypress Ulmus americana American Elm Ulmus parvifolia Lacebark Elm Zelkova serrata Japanese Zelkova Evergreen Trees Cedrus deodara Deodar Cedar Cupressocyparis leylandii Leyland Cypress Cryptomeria japonica Japanese Cryptomeria Ilex opaca American Holly IIex x attenuata Fosteri Foster’s Holly Ilex x attenuata Savannah Savannah Holly Ilex x NellieStevens Nellie Stevens Holly Junipers virginiana Eastern Redcedar Magnolia grandiflora Southern Magnolia Pinus nigra Austrian Pine Pinus sylvestris Scotch Pine Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Pinus thunbergi Japanese Black Pine Ornamental Trees Acer palmatum Japanese Maple Chionanthus virginicus White Fringetree Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood Cornus kousa Kousa Dogwood Cercis Canadensis Eastern Redbud BRIGHTLEAF AT THE PARK
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park: 2014 Data Summary
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park 2014 Data Summary Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2016/1016 ON THIS PAGE Tiny, bright yellow blossoms of Hypoxis hirsuta grace the forest floor at Congaree National Park. Photograph courtesy of Sarah C. Heath, Southeast Coast Network. ON THE COVER Spiraling compound leaf of green dragon (Arisaema dracontium) at Congaree National Park. Photograph courtesy of Sarah C. Heath, Southeast Coast Network Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park 2014 Data Summary Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2016/1016 Sarah Corbett Heath1 and Michael W. Byrne2 1National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, GA 31558 2National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Drive Athens, GA 30605 May 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 | 3 Collier County Native Plant List
    Collier County Native Plant List Plant Coastal Zone Mid Zone Inland Zone Trees- Large Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum) X X X Fiddlewood (Citharexylum fruiticosum) X X Gumbo Limbo (Bursera simaruba) X Sugarberry (Celtis laevigata) X X X Jamaican Dogwood (Piscidia piscipula) X Laurel Oak (Quercus laurifolia) X X X Live Oak (Quercus virginiana) X X X Mahogany (Swietenia mahogany) X X Mastic (Mastichdendron foetidissimum) X X Paradise Tree (Simarouba glauca) X Red Maple (Acer rubrum) X X X Royal Palm (Roystonea elata) X X Seagrape (Coccoloba uvifera) X X Slash Pine (Pinus elliottii) X X X Sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana) X X X Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) X X X Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) X X X West Indian Laurelcherry (Prunus myrtifolia) X Wild Tamarind (Lysiloma latisiliquum) X X Willow Bustic (Sideroxylon salicifolium) X X Wingleaf Soapberry (Sapindus saponaria) X X Trees- Medium to Small Black Ironwood (Krugiodendron ferreum) X X Blolly (Guapira discolor) X Cabbage Palm (Sabal palmetto)* X X X Dahoon Holly (Ilex cassine) X X X Florida Elm (Ulmus americana) X X X Green Buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus) X X Milkbark (Drypetes diversifolia) X Pigeon Plum (Coccoloba diversifolia) X Pitch Apple (Clusia rosea) X Satinleaf (Chrysophyllum oliviforme) X X Scrub Hickory (Carya floridana) X X X Scrub Live Oak (Quercus geminata) X X X Silver Buttonwood (Conocarpus erectus X ‘Sericeous’) Simpson Stopper (Myrcianthes fragrans) X X X Soldierwood (Colubrina elliptica) X Shrubs- Large (‘B’ Buffers) Bahama Strongbark (Bourreria succulenta) X Buttonwood
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Native Versus Old-Field Vegetation in Upland Pinelands Managed with Frequent Fire, South Georgia, Usa
    A COMPARISON OF NATIVE VERSUS OLD-FIELD VEGETATION IN UPLAND PINELANDS MANAGED WITH FREQUENT FIRE, SOUTH GEORGIA, USA Thomas E. Ostertag1 and Kevin M. Robertson2 Tall Timbers Research Station, 13093 Henry Beadel Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32312, USA ABSTRACT Fire-maintained, herb-dominated upland pinelands of the southeastern U.S. Coastal Plain may be broadly divided into those that have arisen through secondary succession following abandonment of agriculture (old-field pinelands) and those that have never been plowed (native pinelands). The ability to distinguish these habitat types is important for setting conservation priorities by identifying natural areas for conservation and appropriate management and for assessing the ecological value and restoration potential for old-field pine forests managed with frequent fire. However, differences in species composition have rarely been quantified. The goals of this study were to characterize the species composition of native and old-field pineland ground cover, test the ability to distinguish communities of previously unknown disturbance history, and suggest indicator species for native versus old-field pinelands. Plant composition was surveyed in areas known to be native ground cover, those known to be old fields, and those with an uncertain disturbance history. Twelve permanent plots were established in each cover type and sampled in spring (April–May) and fall (October–November) in 2004 and 2005. Of the 232 species identified in the plots, 56 species were present only in native ground-cover plots, of which 17 species occurred in a sufficient number of plots to have a statistically significant binomial probability of occurring in native ground cover and might be considered indicator species.
    [Show full text]