DOCSLIB.ORG

Communist Party of Chile Joint Declaration of the Latin American Conference in Chile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Communist Party of Chile Joint Declaration of the Latin American Conference in Chile Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line * Anti-Revisionism in Chile Communist Party of Chile Joint Declaration of the Latin American Conference in Chile Published: 2018 Transcription, Editing and Markup: Paul Saba and Sam Richards. Copyright: This work is in the Public Domain under the Creative Commons Common Deed. You can freely copy, distribute and display this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit the Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line as your source, include the url to this work, and note any of the transcribers, editors & proof readers above. Proletarians of All Countries, Unite! JOINT DECLARATION OF THE LATIN AMERICAN CONFERENCE IN CHILE, 1-2 DECEMBER 2018: LONG LIVE MAOISM, DOWN WITH REVISIONISM! LONG LIVE THE BIRTHDAY OF CHAIRMAN GONZALO AND THE DAY OF THE PEOPLE´S LIBERATION ARMY! On the 1st - 2nd of December 2018, the Latin American Conference in Chile, called by the Communist Party of Chile, was carried out successfully. The event has served to develop the debate concerning decisive points for the International Communist Movement, in the spirit of proletarian internationalism and of implacable struggle against revisionism of the old and the new type. We, the signatories of the present Declaration, extend our warm communist salutes to all the communists and revolutionaries of the World; to the heroic masses who give their lives in the people's wars and armed struggles as well as in all the heroic struggles of the proletariat and the oppressed peoples against imperialism, reaction and revisionism. As a product of this successful event we publish the present Joint Declaration, summarizing the addressed issues. The Communist Party of Chile, in the midst of difficulties and in spite of the complex situation it is going through, is advancing successfully in its reconstitution process, applying Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, principally Maoism, and the universal contributions of Chairman Gonzalo, to the specific conditions of the Chilean revolution. Today, the Communist Party of Chile, proceeding from the Marxist-Leninist ideas of its founder Luis Emilio Recabarren, is assuming these tasks applying the proletarian principles: that only by defeating and crushing opposing and revisionist lines, and only struggling shoulder to shoulder with the masses, principally proletarian and peasant, can the Party apply the universal ideology, prepare and initiate the people's war and in the midst of this struggle generate the guiding thought and the general political line necessary to guarantee the conquest of power in the whole country and the march until communism. Thus, during this process the PCC has waged and continues to wage hard struggles and rectification campaigns against the positions of new revisionism, which denies the reconstitution process, promotes conciliation instead of struggle, opposes bringing the ideological struggle to the masses and denies Chile's semifeudal character and the existence of bureaucrat capitalism in the country, under the pretext of “lack of understanding”. In Peru, the Communist Party of Peru and its Central Committee continue to all-embracingly lead the people's war, maintaining the course of the revolution in the midst of the complex situation of the bend in the road and the dark work of the opposing lines: the revisionist and capitulationist ROL and the LOL with its armed revisionism. Struggling shoulder to shoulder with the masses, leading them in their struggles and incorporating them into the people's war, the Party advances in retaking what has been lost to fulfill the plans established by our Great Leadership Chairman Gonzalo. At the same time, the Party continues to struggle as a red faction in the International Communist Movement and through its generated organ for the work abroad, the Peru People's Movement, unmasking and crushing revisionism, mainly new revisionism with a “maoist” label, and every convergence with it; a revisionism that promotes capitulation, conciliation and opportunism in the organizations of the proletariat and presents the main danger and obstacle to the reunification of the communists on world level and the advance of the people's wars. Concerning the international situation, we the signatories take firm positions on the following points: Imperialism today finds itself in its general and final crisis, and the world proletarian revolution is in its third and last moment, that of the strategic offensive of the world revolution. We reject and condemn every convergence with the revisionist thesis of the ROL in Peru, of the so-called “retreat of the world revolution”, a thesis that serves as a pretext for promoting capitulation, parliamentary cretinism, “peace accords” and the supposed “Tactical alliances” with one or another imperialist superpower or power, as we have seen in the case of Prachanda's revisionist treason in Nepal and the conciliation with it and with Avakian's revisionism that continues to express itself within the ICM. We reaffirm ourselves in that all the imperialists and reactionaries are paper tigers, and the duty of the communists in each country is to base themselves on the immense masses of our class and of the oppressed peoples, define and combat the main imperialist enemy and ward off the actions of the other superpowers and powers until the final sweeping away of imperialism, reaction and revisionism off the face of the Earth within the 50-100 years. The new imperialist redivision of the World is already under way. The three superpowers, Yankee imperialism, Chinese imperialism and Russian imperialism are fighting over the booty, which is the oppressed nations of the Third World, and for world hegemony. The other imperialist powers participate in the redivision to protect and expand their interests and in their eagerness to become superpowers. All the imperialists are preparing for a new, direct world war, which will start when the strategic superiority of one of the superpowers is defined. Facing this situation, the urgent task of the communists is to reconstitute or generate their Parties to prepare, initiate and develop the people's war in each country, aiming at the world people's war against the imperialist world war. We reject and condemn every convergence within our ranks with the reactionary thesis of the “multipolar world”, of a supposed “anti-imperialist front” with imperialist superpowers or powers, presenting one single superpower as the only enemy of the peoples of the world, which is the case with those who put forward the United States as the only enemy and say nothing about Russian or Chinese imperialism. The contradiction between imperialism and the oppressed nations continues to be the principal contradiction in the world today, and the Third World is the base of the world revolution. The heroic people's wars and armed struggles under the banner of Maoism, in Peru, in India, in Philippines and other places, are the highest expression of this truth, and therefore it is even more urgent to develop the struggle against revisionism, particularly in those Parties that lead people's wars. In the oppressed nations the communists have to unite all the classes of the people under the leadership of the proletariat to sweep away - with people's war - the three mountains, imperialism, bureaucrat capitalism and semifeudalism. In the democratic revolution, the United Front under certain conditions must include the middle or national bourgeoisie, but under no circumstances can the proletariat and the people form an alliance with the big bourgeoisie or the landlords and their states, which are enemies and targets of the revolution. We reject those positions which define some reactionary governments as “anti-imperialist regimes”, when in reality they are governments of the ruling classes that use the “anti-imperialist” or “revolutionary” demagogy in their attempts to restructure their states and save bureaucrat capitalism through corporatism and / or a “change of master”, as in the case of the fascist government of Venezuela. We communists support every national liberation movement against imperialism, but we reject and condemn every false national liberation movement that, under the pretext of "tactics" sell themselves to one or another superpower or power as a chess piece in the new redivision of the world. In the imperialist countries, the task of the communists is to unite the proletariat and the people, basing themselves on the deepest and most profound masses, against the bourgeoisie and its imperialist state, rejecting and condemning the social-chauvinist politics of uniting with one's “ own ”imperialist bourgeoisie against one or another superpower, a politics that serves to make the class and the people tail after the bourgeoisie, in the service of the new redivision and the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. The current heroic and just struggles of the masses in the imperialist countries, like we now see in France, are a powerful expression of the growing revolutionary situation in uneven development that exists in the world, and of the urgent need for proletarian leadership to crush the reaction's attempts to divert the struggles through fascism and revisionism. It is the duty of the communists in these countries to reconstitute or generate their Parties as militarized Marxist-Leninist-Maoist Parties to prepare, initiate and develop the people´s war and thus carry out the socialist revolution. As a part of this process, mobilize the masses against imperialism and in support of the people's wars and armed struggles of national liberation in the oppressed countries, keeping in mind that the main form of this support is to unfold the revolution in one's own country, in the belly of the beast. All the imperialists today apply more and more fascism to different degrees and in different forms, in combination with liberalism and social / chauvinist revisionism, to strengthen the rear serving the new redivision. They intensify the repression, racism and counterrevolutionary violence and mobilize sections of the people in corporate ways; all this as part of their politics to avoid that the intensified exploitation and the imperialist wars generate more resistance and more revolution.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Answer: Maoism Is a Form of Communism Developed by Mao Tse Tung
    Ques 1: What is Maoism? Answer: Maoism is a form of communism developed by Mao Tse Tung. It is a doctrine to capture State power through a combination of armed insurgency, mass mobilization and strategic alliances. The Maoists also use propaganda and disinformation against State institutions as other components of their insurgency doctrine. Mao called this process, the ‘Protracted Peoples War’, where the emphasis is on ‘military line’ to capture power. Ques 2: What is the central theme of Maoist ideology? Answer: The central theme of Maoist ideology is the use of violence and armed insurrection as a means to capture State power. ‘Bearing of arms is non-negotiable’ as per the Maoist insurgency doctrine. The maoist ideology glorifies violence and the ‘Peoples Liberation Guerrilla Army’ (PLGA) cadres are trained specifically in the worst forms of violence to evoke terror among the population under their domination. However, they also use the subterfuge of mobilizing people over issues of purported inadequacies of the existing system, so that they can be indoctrinated to take recourse to violence as the only means of redressal. Ques 3: Who are the Indian Maoists? Answer: The largest and the most violent Maoist formation in India is the Communist Party of India (Maoist). The CPI (Maoist) is an amalgamation of many splinter groups, which culminated in the merger of two largest Maoist groups in 2004; the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist), People War and the Maoist Communist Centre of India. The CPI (Maoist) and all its front organizations formations have been included in the list of banned terrorist organizations under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM MAOISM to TROTSKYISM -Reprinted from WORKERS VANGUARD, No.1, October 1971
    iii PREFACE The Communist Horking Collective originated tvhen a small group of Ivlaoists came together in Los Angeles to undertake an intensive investigation of the history of the communist movement in order to develop a strategy for the U.S. ,socialist revolution. Its study of the essentials of Stalinist and Maoist theory led the CWC to the inescapable conclusion that the theory of IISocialism in One Country" is in irreconcilable opposition to revolutionary internationalism. The consolidation of the CWC around Trotskyism and its systematic study of the various ostensible Trotskyist international tendencies was culminated in the fusion between the CWC and the Spartacist League in September 1971. The brief history of the Ct'lC which appeared originally in the first issue of Workers Vanguard (see page viii) alludes to the splits of the CWC's founding cadre from the Revolutionary Union (RU) and the California Communist League (CCL). To convey the genesis of this process, we have included a number of forerunner documents going back to the original split from the CPUSA on the 50th anniver­ sary of the October Revolution. The original resignation of comrade~ Treiger and Miller began the "floundering about for three years ••• seeking in Mao Tse Tung Thought a revolutionary al ternati ve to the revisionists." Treiger went on to help found the CWC; fUller con­ tinued to uphold the dogmatic tradition and declined to even answer the "Letter to a IvIao~_st" (see page 30). Why the Critique of "Tvw Stages"? The lynchpin on which all variants of the fJIaoist "t"t'lO stage" theory of revolution rest--whether applied to the advanced countries or to the colonial world--is collaboration with the ruling class or a section of it during the initial "stage." Early in its develop­ ment the CWC had rejected the conception as it was applied to the Un1 ted States, but believed it remained applicable to the col'onial revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Frantz Fanon and the Peasantry As the Centre of Revolution
    Chapter 8 Frantz Fanon and the Peasantry as the Centre of Revolution Timothy Kerswell Frantz Fanon is probably better known for his work on decolonization and race, but it would be remiss to ignore his contribution to the debate about social classes and their roles as revolutionary subjects. In this respect, Fanon argued for a position that was part of an influential thought current which saw the peasant at the center of world revolutionary struggles. In The Wretched of the Earth, Fanon argued that “It is clear that in the co- lonial countries the peasants alone are revolutionary, for they have nothing to lose and everything to gain. The starving peasant, outside the class system, is the first among the exploited to discover that only violence pays.”1 This statement suggests not only that the peasant would play an important part in liberation and revolutionary struggles, but that they would be the sole revolu- tionary subjects in forthcoming change. Fanon’s attempt to place the peasant at the center was part of a wider cur- rent of thought. This can be seen in the statement of Lin Biao, one of the fore- most thinkers of Maoism who argued, “It must be emphasized that Comrade Mao Tse-tung’s theory of the establishment of rural revolutionary base areas and the encirclement of the cities from the countryside is of outstanding and universal practical importance for the present revolutionary struggles of all the oppressed nations and peoples, and particularly for the revolutionary struggles of the oppressed nations and peoples in Asia, Africa and Latin America against imperialism and its lackeys.”2 It was this theorization that “turn[ed] the image of the peasantry upside down,”3 especially from Marx’s previous assessment that peasants constituted a “sack of potatoes”4 in terms of their revolutionary class-consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nepalese Maoist Movement in Comparative Perspective: Learning from the History of Naxalism in India
    HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies Volume 23 Number 1 Himalaya; The Journal of the Article 8 Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies 2003 The Nepalese Maoist Movement in Comparative Perspective: Learning from the History of Naxalism in India Richard Bownas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya Recommended Citation Bownas, Richard. 2003. The Nepalese Maoist Movement in Comparative Perspective: Learning from the History of Naxalism in India. HIMALAYA 23(1). Available at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol23/iss1/8 This Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by the DigitalCommons@Macalester College at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RICHARD BowNAS THE NEPALESE MAOIST MovEMENT IN CoMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: LEARNIN G FROM THE H ISTORY OF NAXALISM IN INDIA This paper compares the contemporary Maoist movement in Nepal with the Naxalite movemelll in India, from 1967 to the present. The paper touches on three main areas: the two movemems' ambiguous relationship to ethnicity, the hi stories of prior 'traditional' m obilization that bo th move­ ments drew on, and the relationship between vanguard and mass movement in both cases. The first aim of the paper is to show how the Naxalite movemem has transformed itself over the last 35 years and how its military tacti cs and organizational· form have changed . I then ask whether Nepal's lvla o­ ists more closely resemble the earli er phase of Naxali sm , in which the leadership had broad popular appeal and worked closely with its peasant base, o r its later phase, in which the leadership became dise ngaged fr om its base and adopted urban 'terror' tactics.
    [Show full text]
  • Critique of Maoist Reason
    Critique of Maoist Reason J. Moufawad-Paul Foreign Languages Press Foreign Languages Press Collection “New Roads” #5 A collection directed by Christophe Kistler Contact – [email protected] https://foreignlanguages.press Paris 2020 First Edition ISBN: 978-2-491182-11-3 This book is under license Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1 The Route Charted to Date 7 Chapter 2 Thinking Science 19 Chapter 3 The Maoist Point of Origin 35 Chapter 4 Against Communist Theology 51 Chapter 5 The Dogmato-eclecticism of “Maoist Third 69 Worldism” Chapter 6 Left and Right Opportunist Practice 87 Chapter 7 Making Revolution 95 Conclusion 104 Acknowledgements 109 Introduction Introduction In the face of critical passivity and dry formalism we must uphold our collective capacity to think thought. The multiple articulations of bourgeois reason demand that we accept the current state of affairs as natural, reducing critical thinking to that which functions within the boundaries drawn by its order. Even when we break from the diktat of this reason to pursue revolutionary projects, it is difficult to break from the way this ideological hegemony has trained us to think from the moment we were born. Since we are still more-or-less immersed in cap- italist culture––from our jobs to the media we consume––the training persists.1 Hence, while we might supersede the boundaries drawn by bourgeois reason, it remains a constant struggle to escape its imaginary. The simplicity encouraged by bourgeois reasoning––formulaic repeti- tion, a refusal to think beneath the appearance of things––thus finds its way into the reasoning of those who believe they have slipped its grasp.
    [Show full text]
  • Traveling Theory: Fredric Jameson's Interpretations of the Cultural Revolution and Maoism
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 20 (2018) Issue 3 Article 5 Traveling Theory: Fredric Jameson’s Interpretations of the Cultural Revolution and Maoism Xian Wang University of Notre Dame Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the American Studies Commons, Chinese Studies Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, and the European Languages and Societies Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities Index (Wilson), Humanities International Complete (EBSCO), the International Bibliography of the Modern Language Association of America, and Scopus (Elsevier). The journal is affiliated with the Purdue University Press monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies. Contact: <[email protected]> Recommended Citation Wang, Xian. "Traveling Theory: Fredric Jameson’s Interpretations of the Cultural Revolution and Maoism." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 20.3 (2018): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3271> This text has been double-blind peer reviewed by 2+1 experts in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • On Mao's Contradictions
    REVIEWS Rebecca E. Karl, Mao Zedong and China in the Twentieth-Century World Duke University Press: Durham, nc 2010, $21.95, paperback 216 pp, 978 0 8223 4795 8 Tariq Ali ON MAO’S CONTRADICTIONS The emergence of China as the world’s economic powerhouse has shifted the centre of the global market eastwards. The prc’s growth rates are the envy of elites everywhere, its commodities circulating even in the tiniest Andean street markets, its leaders courted by governments strong and weak. These developments have ignited endless discussion on the country and its future. The mainstream media are essentially concerned with the extent to which Beijing is catering to the economic needs of Washington, while think- tankers worry that China will sooner or later mount a systematic challenge to the political wisdom of the West. Academic debate, meanwhile, usually con- centrates on the exact nature and the mechanics of contemporary capitalism in China. The optimists of the intellect argue that its essence is determined by the ccp’s continued grip on power, seeing China’s pro-market turn as a version of the Bolsheviks’ New Economic Policy; in more delirious moments, they argue that China’s leaders will use their new economic strength to build a socialism purer than anything previously attempted, based on proper development of the productive forces and not the tin-pot communes of the past. Others, by contrast, hold that a more accurate name for the ruling party would not even require a change of initials—Communist is easily replaced with Capitalist. A third view insists that the Chinese future is simply not foreseeable; it is too soon to predict it with any certainty.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuing the Revolution Under the Dictatorship of the Proletariat," We Must Begin by Ex­ Ploring This Fundamental Concept of Conflict
    Chapter One ON CONFLICT Contradiction exists in the process of the devel­ opment of all things, and ... in the process of the development of each thing a movement of opposites exists from beginning to end.1 The central idea around which the political thought of Mao Zedong was constructed was that of conflict or contradiction and the change to which it gives rise. Each of the important political themes with which he dealt in his political writings was grounded in his view of conflict and change as aspects of the natural or given state of the political realm, as they are in the realm of na­ ture. Because his theory of knowledge was based on this central idea, he regarded his political ideas not only as an explication of, but also as an example of this view of conflict and change, and thus as subject to the same laws of development that govern natural and political phenomena. In order, therefore, to under­ stand the logic of Mao's theory of "continuing the revolution under the dictatorship of the proletariat," we must begin by ex­ ploring this fundamental concept of conflict. Mao's view of contradiction, conflict, and change can usefully be considered in terms of four aspects: first, as I have suggested, he took conflict to be a given, natural condition in society and nature alike; second, he regarded it as a ubiquitous condition; third, he viewed conflict as a beneficial characteristic of the world, in that the change it promotes is positive and progressive; and finally, he believed that conflict is a permanent condition of nature and society.
    [Show full text]
  • Mao's "On Contradiction," Mao-Hegel/Mao-Deleuze
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 20 (2018) Issue 3 Article 3 Mao's "On Contradiction," Mao-Hegel/Mao-Deleuze Kenneth Surin Duke University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the American Studies Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, Education Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other Film and Media Studies Commons, Reading and Language Commons, Rhetoric and Composition Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Television Commons, and the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities
    [Show full text]
  • Maoism in South America Pinkoski
    Maoism in South America: Comparing Peru’s Sendero Luminoso with Mexico’s PRP and PPUA Kevin Pinkoski Abstract This paper attempts to test to what level the distinction can be made between Maoism, Mao Tse-Sung’s theory of revolutionary communism, as it functioned in China during the People’s Revolution and in South America. This paper will compare the Maoist ideology of two Maoist leaders and their revolutionary movements: Mexico’s Florencio Medrano and Peru’s Abimael Guzman. Introduction Maoism, Mao Tse-Sung’s theory of revolutionary communism, offered an interpretation of Marxism inspired by the political reality of China. Like other leftist movements, Maoism managed to create both global influence and revolutionary movements. This “success” was based in both Maoism’s diagnosis of imperialism and in its interpretation of socialism.1 Mao criticized both the Cold War’s “First World” and “Second World” for their attempts to dominate the politics of the “Third World’s” development.2 True socialism can only be attainable in the “Third World,” where marginalized classes have not been brought up through imperialism.3 This phenomenon is only possible through a People’s War, which is to be understood as armed action taken by the masses in an attempt to remove both the bourgeois and their institutions.4 The final result was therefore an established society that uses anti-feudal economics based in agrarian socialism.5 This process, as outlined by Mao, departed from traditional Marxism, and Marxism’s emphasis on urbanized industry. Instead, Maoism emphasized an end to urban/rural division and other economic discrepancies created by imperialism and the bourgeois.
    [Show full text]
  • Utopia and Science Fiction in Raymondwilliams
    chapter 19 Utopia and Science Fiction in Raymond Williams* Raymond Williams was a significant figure in late twentieth-century intellec- tual life, a pioneer in the early history of what we now known as Cultural Studies and also a central inspiration for the early British New Left. He was variously – and inaccurately – likened to a British Lukács,1 a British Bloch2 and even, according to The Times, ‘the British Sartre’. Habermas’s initial the- orisation of the public sphere derived something from Williams’s Culture and Society;3 Stuart Hall, the Jamaican cultural theorist, cited Williams as ‘a major influence’ on his ‘intellectual and political formation’;4 Edward Said claimed to have ‘learned so much’ from Williams;5 Stephen Greenblatt, the guru of the New Historicism, recalled with enthusiasm the ‘critical subtlety and theoretical intelligence’ of Williams’s lectures at Cambridge;6 Cornel West, the most prom- inent contemporary exponent of Black Cultural Studies, described Williams as ‘the last of the great European male revolutionary socialist intellectuals’.7 There areWilliamsites in Italy,8 in Brazil,9 in Australia.10 None seem to have made any- thing of Williams’s enduring interest in science fiction, however, an oversight this essay will attempt to rectify. I have argued elsewhere that there are three main ‘phases’ in Williams’s thought, each explicable in terms of its own differentially negotiated settle- ment between the kind of literary humanism associated with the English lit- erary critic, F.R. Leavis, and some version or another of Marxism; and each characterisable in relation to a relatively distinct, consecutive moment in the history of the British New Left.11 The first and second sphases are associated * This chapter has been published previously in Science Fiction Studies, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Maoist Aesthetics in Western Left-Wing Thought
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 20 (2018) Issue 3 Article 4 Maoist Aesthetics in Western Left-wing Thought Jun Zeng Shanghai University Siying Duan Simon Fraser University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the Chinese Studies Commons, and the Comparative Literature Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities Index (Wilson), Humanities International Complete (EBSCO), the International Bibliography of the Modern Language Association of America, and Scopus (Elsevier). The journal is affiliated with the Purdue University Press monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies. Contact: <[email protected]> Recommended Citation Zeng, Jun; and Duan, Siying. "Maoist Aesthetics in Western Left-wing Thought." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 20.3 (2018): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3250> This text has been double-blind peer reviewed by 2+1 experts in the field.
    [Show full text]